Visce

Cri

1Facude C

Pontif

OBJE[1]. Arisk tobetweparticuVAT afindinusing CircumRadiatrelatiorelatioMETHrange:anthrohistorybiocheBMI, (TF), AdditiMRI sincludshot tuout-ofimagesequenand SAbordersemi-apresenmorphWe pefat, AcorrelaRESUshowefeature(range2390cWe foCompARFI of adv0.94 bbetweDISCUindepepopulaVAT +Clinicsuperiliver samounCONCused tvolumREFE2011,

eral adipose ti

stóbal Martín Serr

lty of Medicine, PoChile, Santiago, Regificia Universidad

Metr

ECTIVE: ViscerAdditionally, it ha

o develop NALen different biomular, we studied and liver stiffnegs; measuremenMRI; anthrop

mference (WC)tion Force Impu

on between anthon between the aHODS: 19 pati: 61.5-97) with opometry, ARFIy, physical exaemical workup, WC, body fat bicipital fold

ionally, 10 TrE mscans were perfoding the followiurbo spin-echo, f-phase, T1 grade sequences. Wence, centered atAT volumes. Thr until below theautomatic softwnce of hepatichological criteriaerformed differeARFI and anthation statistic.

ULTS: Clinicaled that no subjes of liver cirrhe = 22.6-29), ancc ± 801cc, (rangound a poor correparing measurem

was 0.10 (p=0.6vanced liver fibrobetween (VAT+en (VAT+SAT) USSION: We cendent of the boation. However,+ SAT.

cal diagnosis indior to 1.6m/s thastiffness. This fint of VAT to conCLUSION. Becto study the clin

mes, since it has bERENCES. 1. v

5. Schwenzer et

issue volume m

rano García1,2, Fran

ontificia Universidgión MetropolitanCatólica de Chile,

ropolitana, Chile, 6

ral Adipose Tissas been reported

LFD [2]. In thismarkers and livethe association

ess. For this purpnts of VAT andometric indexe) and Transienulse) for measurihropometric ind

amount of VAT aents (mean ageDM2 were enroI, and MRI. C

am and laboratoHbA1c). Anthropercentage (BF(BF), supraili

measurements wormed on a Philing sequences: T2 with fat satudient echo, ande also included t fat, to assess he FOV includee kidneys. VAT

ware (Image J [3c disease waa over the MRI sent comparisonshropometry usin

l diagnosis anject had clinicahosis. The BM

nd the WC was ge = 1173-2252) elation comparin

ments of adipose 66) and betweenosis [4]), we fouSAT) with ARFand ARFI (p=0

confirmed previdy phenotype. M in those patient

dicated that noneat are at a greateinding suggests nfirm whether thcause of the impnical condition obeen demonstrat

van der Poorten et al Invest Radio

measurement

ncisco Barrera3, HPrieto2,6,

dad Católica de Chna, Chile, 3Gastroe, Santiago, Región6Electrical Engine

sue (VAT) has bd that type 2 diab work, we proper fibrosis/cirrhoof liver fibrosis/pose, we performd Subcutaneous es, like Body nt Elastographying liver stiffnesdexes and MRIand the stiffness : 62 years, rangolled. All patienClinical evaluatory data (hemoopometric data

F%), brachial ciriac fold (SpF)

were made in the llips Intera 1.5Thalf-Fourier sin

uration, in-phased diffusion weiga spectral excitaquantitatively V

ed the diaphragmwas measured u3]) (Figure 1). s evaluated u

scans. between abdomng the Pearson

nd MRI findinal or biochemicI was 29.3 ± 499.7cm ± 9.1 (rand SAT was 3

ng anthropometrtissue with ARF

n (VAT+SAT) wund that the correFI (p=0.001) (Fi.29). ous results [5],

Moreover, we didts with greater l

e of the DM2 paer risk of developerforming furt

here is a progresplications of devf the liver. For tted that anthropoet al Hepatology

ol 2010.

using MRI, andiab

Hugo Vidal4, CarloPablo Irarrázaval2

hile, Santiago, Regenterology, Pontifin Metropolitana, Ceering, Pontificia U

been associated wbetic patients (Dpose to evaluateosis in type 2 dia/cirrhosis with bmed a study that

Adipose TissueMass Index (B

y (TrE) using ss. Furthermore, measurement of the liver.

ge: 55-75, meannts underwent cltion included cglobin, platelet assessed includercumference (B) and subscapuright lobe of the

T MR ngle-e and ghted ation VAT matic using

The using

minal n’s

ngs cal 4.7 range =85-120).143cc ± 1298ccric indexes with FI we found that

with ARFI was 0.elation was 0.63igure 2, right). I

indicating that d not find a relatliver stiffness w

atients had diagnoping liver fibrosher studies of lision of liver fibrveloping hepaticthis, MR imagesometric measurey 2008, 2. Luxm

Figure 2. adipose tiadipose ti

nd its relationbetic patients.

s Riquelme4, Pilar,6, Cristián Tejos2,6

gión Metropolitanficia Universidad CChile, 5Nutrition &Universidad Catól

with liver fibrosi

DM2) are at highe the relationshabetic patients. Ioth the amount ot included clinice (SAT) volumeBMI) and WaiARFI (Acoust

we evaluated thof VAT and th

n weight: 77.2klinical evaluatiocomplete medic

count, compleed weight, heighC), tricipital foular fold (SbFe liver.

. The TrE was . measurements o: the correlation .08 (p=0.72). By

3 between VAT aIn the group wi

BMI and WC ation between thee found a good

nosis of liver fibsis or cirrhosis. iver fibrosis (e.grosis and begin Nc disorders due s do not only plments are bad pr

mi et al. JLUMH

(left) Dispersion gssue volume. (righssue volume. In bl

n with liver ela

r Labbé3, Jessica L6, and Sergio Urib

na, Chile, 2BiomedCatólica de Chile,

& Diabetes, Pontifilica de Chile, Sant

is on patients wiher hip In of

cal es ist tic he he

kg, on, cal ete ht,

old F).

1.65 ± 0.8 m/s,

of VAT (Figurebetween ARFI

y analyzing the gand ARFI (p=0.ith ARFI inferio

are bad predictoe stiffness of thecorrelation betw

brosis/cirrhosis. WOn this group, h

g. liver biopsy) oNASH medical tto metabolic dis

lay a role in liveredictors of this

HS 2008 3. http://

Figure 1. adipose tis

graph showing theht) Dispersion graplue squares data w

astography an

Liberona5, Marco Abe2,4 dical Imaging Cent

Santiago, Región icia Universidad Ctiago, Región Metr

ith Non-alcoholi

(range 0.8-3.4

e 2, left) (r=0.13 and VAT was -0group with ARF12), 0.66 betwee

or to 1.6 m/s the

ors of VAT volue liver and the adween ARFI valu

We identified a higher VAT volon those patienttherapy. seases, different

er fibrosis diagnfat depot.

//rsbweb.nih.gov

MRI image (a), assue (c), and subcu

e relation between ph showing the rel

with direct correlati

nd anthropom

Arrese3, Francisco

ter, Pontificia UniMetropolitana, Ch

Católica de Chile, ropolitana, Chile

ic Fatty Liver D

m/s). The amou

for BMI), and (0.01 (p=0.94), be

FI superior to 1.6en SAT and ARe largest correlat

ume in type 2 ddipose tissue depues and the amo

subgroup of patlume was associts with largest A

t imaging biomaosis, but can als

v/ij/ 4. Nguyen e

and binary image (utaneous adipose ti

waist circumferenlation between ARion.

etry, in type 2

Cruz4, Claudia

versidad Católica hile, 4Radiology, Santiago, Región

isease (NAFLD)

unt of VAT was

(r=0.56 for WC)etween SAT and

6 m/s (suggestiveRFI (p=0.10), and

tion was r=0.33

diabetic patientspots in the entire

ount of VAT and

tients with ARFIiated with higherARFI and larges

arkers should beso measure VAT

et al Hepatology

(b) visceral issue

nce and visceral RFI and visceral

2

)

s

. d e d ,

, e d

I r t

e T

y

4097Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 20 (2012)