dr pepper final presentation[1]

Upload: huzefa-sitabkhan

Post on 07-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    1/16

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    2/16

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    3/16

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    4/16

    PRODUCT- Wide range of carbonated/non-carbonated products like

    Canada Dry, A&W etc as per Indian demands.

    Indian market - they need to customize the taste as per

    the preferences of the local customer.

    For example the use of lime, gingerale, local herbs

    condiments.

    COMPETITORmS PRODUCT

    1) PEPSI- NIMBUZZ, COLA,

    2) PARLE-AGRO- LMN

    3) COKE- COLA, MINUTE MAID LIMBU

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    5/16

    PRICE-

    Follows a premium pricing strategy(through nSNAPPLESo)

    Targets itself for a select niche crowd.

    India Market - they need to revise their prices in order tocompete with the big players.

    COMPETITORmS POSITION

    1) COKE- 45% Competitive pricing policy

    2) PEPSICO- 35%

    3) OTHERS- 20%

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    6/16

    PLACE-

    Currently only some formats (SNAPPLES) are sold

    through Caf Coffee Day

    Distribution through retail chain of stores like Big Bazaar,

    Reliance Fresh, Naturems Basket, Barista, Costa etc and

    also through restaurants.

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    7/16

    PROMOTION- The company must use a combination of

    Pull/Push strategies in order to acquire a large and loyal

    customer base

    COMPETITORmS TECHNIQUECoke- Used chota coke, celebrations (jaashan)

    Pepsico- Uses Youngistaan, blue pepsi for world cup,

    Thumbs Up- win a nNinja Bikeo

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    8/16

    Strengths

    Strong position in each product niche: Overall DPS is the #1 company in the flavoured CSD

    market. Dr. Pepper is the #2 flavoured CSD and Snapple is the leading ready-to-drink tea. The

    current trend of flavoured CSDs gaining market share on colas will benefit the company top line.

    Integrated business model: The Companys combination of brand ownership, bottling and

    distribution gives it inherently more control over the value chain and thus a competitive advantage.

    Customer relationships: DPS has established long standing relationships with many of the

    Companys top customers including bottlers and distributors to national retailers, large foodserviceand convenience store customers.

    Experienced management: Many board members and executive management have experience

    in the food and beverage industry. Their collective experience totals over 200 years.

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    9/16

    Weaknesses

    Smaller compared to larger peers: The firm relies on some third-party bottlers including Coke

    and Pepsi affiliated bottlers for packaging and distribution. This could cause costs to rise in the

    future.

    Lack of exposure to some fast growing segments: DPS has very little or no foothold in some

    fast growing segments including energy drinks, sports drinks, and enhanced waters.

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    10/16

    Opportunities

    Expansion into international markets: Currently, DPS effectively draws no significant portion

    of revenue from outside North America. Comparing the Company to Coca-Cola which operates inover 200 countries and derives approximately 76% of revenues outside of North America, DPS could

    see a large increase in revenues if it decided to expand internationally.

    New product launches and line extensions: DPS sees the best opportunity for growth through

    line extensions, especially with opportunities in high growth and high margin categories, including

    ready to drink teas, energy drinks, and other functional beverages.

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    11/16

    Threats

    Loss of Coca-Cola or PepsiCo affiliated bottlers: If these companies acquire their affiliated

    bottlers and make them wholly owned subsidiaries, DPS could see increased costs. Currently 73% of

    Dr. Pepper volumes are distributed through the Coca-Cola and PepsiCo affiliated bottler systems.

    Furthermore, Coca-Cola and Pepsi affiliated systems each constituted approximately 15% of net

    sales of the Beverage Concentrates segment. Besides increased costs, this could lead to less

    favourable placement within retailers which may be the bigger problem.

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    12/16

    Total market strategy

    Premium market segment products

    Broader product line all drinks under one brand will makeseasier brand recall

    Economies of scale

    Strong revenue growth in other countries will help venture intoIndia

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    13/16

    Excellent stakeholder relations

    Integrated business model

    Variety for consumers as it has wide range of

    different flavors.

    Increasing Per capita income and population growth.

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    14/16

    Increase visibility

    Improve Distribution system

    More tie ups with restaurants, hotels and coffee shops.

    Fix price policy

    Introduce sports drinks or energy drinks to attract youthand tap the market.

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    15/16

    Laggard entry needs differentiation

    Competitive pricing by improving distribution, supply

    system

    Collecting bottle caps contest.

    Movie Product placement to attract mass

    Other aggressive marketing techni ues like college

    events.

  • 8/6/2019 Dr Pepper Final Presentation[1]

    16/16