Dream high and remain committed,

then the dream will come true

Maha Sinnathamby

ENGIE goes beyond energyIntegrated sustainability approach

The Alliance

Greater Springfield – Greater Possibilities

3

Presentation content

Roadmap objectives

Process reminder

Report content

Key findings & solutions

User Manual to go ahead

30-40 min

Additional part: Zoom to Energy City

4

Zero Net

Ambition

3 scenarios

WHAT?

WHEN?

WHERE?

HOW MUCH?

Busines as Usual

Zero Net Electricity

Zero Net Carbon

Better CityCollaborative

Transformative

Resilient

Inclusive

Laboratory

Roadmap

Roadmap objectives

5

Roadmap methodology

Data collection & Assumptions

INTEGRATED

ROADMAP

PROSPECTIVE DIAGNOSIS

ACTIONS & INVESTMENTS

VISION AND AMBITION DEFINITION

Process reminder

6

Integrated approach

WP2 Mobility

WP3 Urban WP4 Buildings

Key principles:

Integrated approach

Hand in hand with the client

Iterative process

WP0 INTEGRATION

Mobility

Urban planning

Buildings

Energy

Public lighting

optimization

WP1 Energy

Digital

7

Roadmap table of content

1. INTRODUCTION

2. GENERAL DATA

3. AMBITIONS FOR

GREATER SPRINGFIELD

ALLIANCE

4. URBAN

5. MOBILITY

6. BUILDINGS

7. ENERGY

8. ROADMAP

9. ENERGY CITY

FRAMEWORK

10. CONCLUSIONS

UrbanKey Findings

Conclusion:

City is developing according to initial masterplan, but in opportunistic way.

Vacant lots making the perception if vacant city.

Connection between precincts is only by roads.

There is no clear identity of the city and its precincts.

To guide the future developments of Greater Springfield, a comprehensive

Urban Framework is needed.

Defining a clear urban vision for the development of Greater Springfield.

Composed by two complementary planning documents; Urban Structure

and Urban Strategies.

UrbanUrban Framework – soft structure

The soft “grid”

The valley structure is

reinforced and assumed as

prominent soft structure for

the development of Greater

Springfield.

The infrastructure as

ecological continuities

The main infrastructural spines of Greater

Springfield have the potential to provide

ecological continuities and are an important

resource for soft and innovative mobility.

The iconic voids

A combination of prominent

central green spaces are

proposed: the existing “piece

unique” Robelle Domain and

5 other public parks

The high park

A green line connecting all

the neighbourhood parks,

functioning as a soft structure

connecting the suburbs and

forming one continuous park.

UrbanUrban Framework – hard structure

The urban

promenade and the

valley platforms

This urban piece combines

mobility, public space and

dynamic city activities

The suburban

clusters

Currently completely

developed, these places have

the potential and qualities to

be redeveloped with

interventions of densification

and intensification.

The urban

platforms

The urban platforms are

singularities in the urban

tissue of Greater Springfield

with a potential regional role

given by their extraordinary

accessibility.

The parkway

Augusta Parkway is

considered a crucial axis for

the city development, it is a

green infrastructure with

space for alternative mobility.

UrbanUrban Framework - strategies

Quick wins

Design guidelines

Small scale

Design guidelines

Large scale

Make space

for wild nature

Punctual

greening

Create green

routes

Facilitate temporal

use

Activate

playful strips

Activate

passages

Create soft

mobility

shortcuts

Innovative

mobility

experimentation

Make the

landscape work

Integrate

water

Make space for

urban agriculture

Plan for

flexibility

Activate

streets

Combine and

mix

Cluster around

armature

Diversify and

mix

Introduce

attractions at

strategic places

Test “the missing

middle”

House everyone

Key Findings & ambitionMobility

Modal share

More than 80% of travel are

made by cars in 2018

The ambition for 2038 is to

create a modal shift for

sustainable modes

Infrastructure & connectivity

Infrastructures are there and oversized

Missing links and connections

Crossing not friendly for pedestrians and cyclists

Ambition to better use the assets with the

population growth to avoid congestion in 2038.

Promote multimodality

Network for active modes (with a focus around

school)

Motorization rate

High # of vehicles per households

with a faster growth than the area

The final goal is to divide by 4 the

# of vehicles per households

Green mobility

Low penetration of EV (<2%)

Diesel buses

Individual mobility

100% decarbonized mobility in

2038 (mix EV & H2)

Digital as a booster of green

mobility (facilitate sharing…)

SolutionsMobility

Mutualization

Innovative parkings

EV, e-bikes sharing

Education & behaviors

Challenges

Mobility education center

Spatial planning & infrastructures

Mobility hubs

School streets

Missing links

Crossing priority for pedestrians & cyclists

Mobility Ecosystem

Digitalization, MaaS

Smart parking

Smart charging

Innovative way of working

Modal shift

Develop performant public transport

Autonomous & on demand modes

Cable car, mobjects

Green & alternative fuels

Slow & fast charging infra

H2 refueling stations for logistic &

buses

Methodology

BuildingsDifferentiations considered:

6 building types:

• Type 1: Individual residential building (i.e. houses)

• Type 2: Mutual residential building (i.e. apartments)

• Type 3: Office, administration and schools

• Type 4: Shops and leisure

• Type 5: Health services

• Type 6: Data center (Polaris)

Calculations based on 3D energy models:

Key Findings

• Individual houses stand for 99%

of residential

• Verticality is rarely used

• Low level of thermal insulation,

but adapted to the local climate

• Insufficient consideration of

bioclimatic aspects (32% gap in

cooling demand for same houses

with different orientations)

• Low share of LED, for interior light

as well as for street lighting

• Strong improvement potential on

behavior and operation

Ambition

Buildings

• Comfort-based energy consumption can

strongly be reduced, respectively -45%

and -36% for houses and offices.

• Ambition of energy consumption

defined per building type for existing

buildings as well as for new buildings

• In average 25% reduction in 2038 vs

2018

Decision matrix:

StrategyBuildings

-Insufficient impact.

Stick to the legal requirements.

+Proven energy savings, profitability not obvious.

To be studied on a case-by-case basis.

++Significant energy savings

Wait for end of lifetime of existing equipment to implement the solution.

Must be implemented in new buildings.

+++Significant energy savings, profitable investment.

Must be implemented.

Solutions

The attention should immediately be focused on

every new building project

Key Findings

ZERO NET ENERGY: 100% zero

net electricity consumption by

2038, up from 25% in 2025 and

50% in 2030. Grid electricity

consumption needs to be offset

through green Power Purchase

Agreements (solar PV and/or wind).

ZERO NET CARBON: 100% zero

net energy consumption by 2038,

up from 50% in 2025 and 75% in

2030. Additionally, a real-time

energy self-sufficiency of 80% by

2038, up from 20% in 2025 and

40% in 2030. The energy

consumption contains electricity,

heating, cooling, and mobility.

ROOFTOP SOLAR: currently,

already a substantial share

(33%) of the individual houses

are equipped with a rooftop

solar PV installation, as this

makes financial sense.

ENERGY DEPENDENCE:

overall, there is a big

dependence on grid-supplied

electricity, grid-supplied

natural gas, and fossil fuels

for mobility.

Ambition

Energy

ZERO NET ENERGY:

• Rooftop and parking PV

• Off-site green power

• Residential reversible heat

pumps

• C&I district cooling network

.

SolutionsEnergy

ZERO NET CARBON:

• Rooftop and parking PV

• Off-site green power

• Residential reversible heat

pumps

• C&I district cooling network

• Battery energy storage

• Hydrogen refuelling stations

.

19

The Journey – Roadmap implementation

Roadmap elements - Users Manual

28 projects defined

incl. Short Term Actions

& Implementation Scheme

Designed to measure progress

in implementation of the

Alliance ambition

Quantitative & Qualitative

Scenarios: BAU,Zero Net

Electricity, Zero Net Carbon

To be followed in each development.

User, Building, City scale

PROJECT CARDS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

TARGETS SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

How do we make the fish swim?

ENERGY CITY

Demonstration

Living Lab

Actions &

Investments

on city scale

20

Projects definition

Selection principles

Springfield City Group

Interest

ENGIE

Interest

HIGH value for ENGIELOW value for SCG

2

LOW valuefor ENGIE & SCG

4

HIGH value for SCGLOW value for ENGIE

3

HIGH value for ENGIE & SCG

1

Energy as a service

District Energy

Green Mobility

Better Cities

Education

Health

Jobs

Livability

Business opportunity Land value increase

Interest for the Alliance:

High Medium NoLow

21

Projects

Projects list Project Card

18 high interest

3 medium interest

7 low interest

28 integrated projects definedShort Description

Key Success Factors

Phase/ Timeline

Short term actions

Incl. link to Digital Roadmap

Investment Potential

Scale

Discipline

Values

Location

22

Solar panels

EV charging stations

ENGIE Research Center

Innovative Data Center

Iconic Buildings –energy positive

Alternative housing

pilot project

Temporary use of vacant lots

Street lighting – LED

Mutualized parking

Car-sharing EV fleet

Mobility as service

DCS for the Strip

Bike-sharing EV fleet

*including real estate, roads, parks…

Total * AUD

~745M

23

Set of actions is at your disposal to take The Journey towards

exemplary city

We remain committed to support the implementation

Zoom to Energy City

24

Greenfield

±40 haIn Node 1, within Knowledge precinct

+ 342,200 GFAPlanned by 2038

3300Residents targeted

Demonstration of integrated solutions

INT

ER

NA

L

Energy City FrameworkLocation in Greater Springfield & within the proposed Urban Framework

25

Urban Landscape Framework

Soft structure

Dynamic Urban places Framework

Hard structure

Position of Energy City

Train station

Orion

Center

Energy City

Valley Sport

park

Education

City

Health

City

INT

ER

NA

L

I - The stripII - The central garden

III - The valley edge

The two iconic buildings

Energy City FrameworkThree complementary places

26

+-

III

III

Program mixity

the strip

commercial

residential

accommodations

cultural

entertainmentthe central garden

residential

education

entertainment

culturalthe valley edge

residential

cultural

commercial (local)

Degree of urban density (GFA/Land)

0.30

0.90

2.90

References images of

the complementary

‘atmosphere’ of the

three places within

the Energy City

INT

ER

NA

L

Energy City FrameworkThree complementary places

27

Building typologiesOffering multiple ways of living, working and

recreation

Open space typologiesDiverse atmospheres to boost social interactions

INT

ER

NA

L

28

III. A FLEXIBLE STRUCTURE

THAT PERMITS THE CAR

an infrastructural frame as

guidance for the

development of the

complementary places

II. A CLIMATE ROBUST

ENVIRONMENT

enabling nature and water

dynamics to ‘contaminate’

the urban tissue

I. A LIVABLE AND VIBRANT

NEIGHBORHOOD

hosting different public spaces

and atmospheres

Energy City FrameworkSuperimposed systems

INT

ER

NA

L

29

VI. A RESOURCEFUL

DISTRICT

being exemplary for others by

providing for itself

IV. A HEALTHY AND

WALKABLE DISTRICT

enabling people to walk and

cycle in a safe and healthy

environment

V. AN INNOVATIVE

PUBLIC MOBILITY

ECOSYSTEM

enabling people to move

through public and shared

transport

Energy City FrameworkSuperimposed systems

INT

ER

NA

L

30

Energy City FrameworkThe superposition of the three complementary places

The strip

The central garden

The valley edge

Sketch of the central spine of the strip

connecting the two iconic building

INT

ER

NA

L

31

Energy City FrameworkStrategic Phasing

FIRST PHASE:

• Construction of two urban

magents at both sides of the

strip.

• Implementation of district

cooling network infrastructure

to the strip.

• Development of east side of

the strip to esure critical mass.

• Completion of sport fields

park (iconic void).

• Implementation of future main

network of pedestrian and

bike lanes of the entire Energy

City.

• Make undeveloped land

available for community

supported temporal uses.

SECOND PHASE:

• Development growing around

the iconic buildings.

• Simultaneous

implementation of selected

parts of the strip, the central

garden and the valley edge.

• Generating a diversified real

estate offering consisting of a

diverse set of building

typologies and

complementary urban

fabrics.

• New development is

accompanied by the design

and construction of a

qualitative open space

structure (urban parks, natural

areas, squares, streetscape,

etc.).

INT

ER

NA

L

32

Energy City FrameworkStrategic Phasing

THIRD PHASE:

• Development steered by the

inner mobility loop.

• Clusters of simultaneous

development of parts of the

strip, the central garden and

the valley edge.

• In this phase a consistent

review of the qualitative and

quantitative results from the

previously developed urban

plots should be implemented.

33

We are proud to contribute to

The Greater Springfield Journeyand looking forward to the next steps

in the city development

The Dream Team

Niels LEEMPUT, PhD

WP1 Energy

Leader

Philippine DE RADIGUÈS

Louise DE VOS

WP2 Mobility

Thibaud HILMARCHERLeader

Charlotte ENGELEN

WP3 Urban

Leader

Brian VAN ACKER

Griet VANHAVERBEKE

Giacomo BONATO

Bart VAN GASSEN

Henno DURNEZ

Thomas HERBER

WP4 Buildings

Leader

Maria PRIETO ROCA

Jolanta ZARZYCKA, PhD

Integration & Coordination

Dries BOURGEOIS

We are committed to support your dream,

which became our dream, too.

It is up to you if you will let us…