dual polarization radars. long-standing problems distinguishing, ice and liquid phases of...
TRANSCRIPT
Long-standing Problems
Distinguishing, ice and liquid phases of precipitation using
radar
Identifying specific hydrometeor populations, such as hail or
supercooled water
Quantifying, rain, snow and hailfall rates using radar.
Multi-Parameter Measurements
Standard Doppler radar (ZHH, Vr, )
Polarization radar (signals of two different polarizations are
processed): Many parameters can be derived
(Measurements of two or more parameters of the radar signal)
* Note notation: ZHH
Transmitted at horizontal polarization
Received at horizontal polarization
LiteratureZrnic, D. S., and A. Ryzhkov: Polarimetry for Weather Service Radars. BAMS, 1999, 389-406
Doviak and Zrnić, 1993: Doppler Radar and Weather Observations. Academic Press.
Bringi and Chandrasekar, 2001: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar. Cambridge University Press.
Vivekanandan, Zrnić, Ellis, Oye, Ryzhkov, Straka, 1999: Cloud microphysical retrieval using S-band dual-polarization radar measurements. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 381-388.
Straka, Zrnić, Ryzhkov, 2000: Bulk hydrometeor classification and quantification using polarimetric radar data: Synthesis and Relations. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 1341-1372.
http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/~schuur/radar.html
Outline
- Polarization of electromagnetic waves
- Linear polarimetric observables (ZDR, LDR, ΦDP (KDP), ρHV,)
- Types of dual-polarization radars today
Research and Applications:- Hydrometeor classification - Rainfall estimates
Linear Polarization
(Doviak and Zrnić, 1993)
http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/~schuur/radar.html
E
E
Electromagnetic Waves
Circular Polarization
Practical use of circular polarization: Tracking aircraft in precipitation.
Light to moderate rain: removal of a large portion (e.g. 99%) of the precipitation echo (transmitted right-hand circular polarized waves become, when scattered from small spherical drops, left-hand polarized).
E
Scattering may be Rayleigh or Mie
Scattering cross section for spherical drops assuming Rayleigh scattering
(spherical drops with D small compared to λ)
- Theoretical and experimental work has been done relating particles scattering cross section to other shapes, sizes and mixture of phases.
62
4
5
DK
Terminology
Copolar power: Power received at the same polarization as the transmitted power
(e.g. transmit horizontal, receive horizontal,
transmit vertical, receive vertical)
Cross-polar power: Power received at the opposite polarization as the transmitted power
(e.g. transmit horizontal, receive vertical,
transmit vertical, receive horizontal)
Two ways in which hydrometeors affect polarization measurements:
Backscatter effects by particles located within the radar resolution volume
Propagation effects by particles located between the radar resolution volume and the radar
Backscatter effects by particles located within the radar resolution volume
Six basic backscatter variables:
1. Reflectivity factor for horizontal polarization ZHH
2. The ratio of the reflected power (or reflectivity factor) at horizontal/vertical polarization (PHH/PVV or ZHH/ZVV) called the Differential Reflectivity (ZDR).
3. The ratio of cross-polar power to copolar power (PVH/PHH) called the Linear Depolarization Ratio (LDR)
Backscatter effects by particles located within the radar resolution volume
Six basic backscatter variables:
4. The correlation coefficient between copolar horizontally and vertically polarized echo signals
iHV e
5. The complex correlation coefficient between copolar horizontal and cross-polar (horizontal transmission) echo E(VHH*VHV)
6. The complex correlation coefficient between copolar vertical and cross-polar (vertical transmission) echo E(VHH*VHV)
Phase difference in H and V caused by
backscattering
Propagation effects by particles located between the radar resolution volume and the radar
1. Attenuation of the horizontal component
2. Attenuation of the vertical component
3. Depolarization
4. Differential phase shift (phase difference in returned signal for the two polarizations) DP
(Pruppacher and Klett, 1997)
4 mm 3.7 mm 2.9 mm
2.7 mm 1.8 mm 1.4 mm
Differential Reflectivity ZDR
ZDR [dB] = 10 log( )– Depends on axis ratio
oblate: ZDR > 0
prolate: ZDR < 0
– For drops: ZDR ~ drop size (0 - 4 dB)
zHH
zVV
ZDR (cont.)
ZDR = 10 log( )
(Pruppacher and Klett, 1997)
zHH
zVV
– For ice crystals: • columns (1 – 4 dB)
• plates, dendrites (2 – 6 dB)
ZDR (cont.)
ZDR = 10 log ( )
(Pruppacher and Klett, 1997)
zHH
zVV
(Hobbs, 1974)
– For hail: (-1 – 0.5 dB)
– For graupel: (-0.5 – 1 dB)
– For snow: (0 – 1 dB)
ZDR (cont.)
• Independent of calibration
• Independent of concentration (but can depend on how the concentration is distributed among various sizes
• Is affected by propagation effects (e.g. attenuation)
LDR [dB] = 10 log( )
Linear Depolarization Ratio LDR
(Pruppacher and Klett 1997)
4 mm 3.7 mm 2.9 mm
zHV
zHH
• Spheroidal hydrometeors with their major/minor axis aligned or orthogonal to the electric field of the wave: LDR - dB
• Detects tumbling, wobbling, canting angles, phase and irregular shaped hydrometeors:
• large rain drops (> -25 dB)• Hail, hail and rain mixtures (-20 - -10 dB)• wet snow (-13 - -18 dB)
8
LDR (cont.)
• Susceptible to noise (cross-polar signal is 2-3 orders of magnitude smaller than copolar signal)
• Independent of radar calibration
• Independent of number concentration
• Lowest observable values : -30 dB (S-Pol), -34 dB (Chill)
Differential Propagation Phase ΦDP
ΦDP [deg.]= ΦHH – ΦVV
ΦHH, ΦVV: cumulative differential phase shift for the total round trip between radar and resolution volume).
ΦHH, ΦVV = differential phase shift upon backscatter
+ differential phase shift along the propagation path
ΦDP (cont.)
ΦDP = ΦHH – ΦVV
• Statistically isotropic particles produce similar phase shifts for horizontally and vertically polarized waves.
• Statistically anisotropic particles produce different phase shifts for horizontally and vertically polarized waves.
• A volume with oblate hydrometeors (large rain, ice crystals): horizontal polarized wave propagates more slowly than vertically polarized wave => larger phase shifts (ΦHH) per unit length => ΦDP increases.
Specific Differential Propagation Phase KDP
KDP [deg/km] =ΦDP(r2) - ΦDP(r1)
2(r2 – r1)
• Independent of receiver/transmitter calibration
• Independent of attenuation
• Less sensitive to variations of size distributions (compared to Z)
• Immune to particle beam blocking
Correlation Coefficient ρHV
Correlation between horizontally and vertically polarized weather signals
Physical occurrence of decorrelation: Horizontal and vertical backscatter fields, caused by each particle in the resolution volume, do not vary simultaneously.
ρHV (cont.)• Influenced by particle mixture (e.g. rain/hail mixture)
• Influenced by the differential phase shifts ΦHH, ΦVV (e.g. oscillation of large drops)
• Influenced by the distributions of eccentricities (e.g. oscillation of large drops)
• Influenced by canting angles (large drops)
• Influenced by irregular particle shapes (e.g. hail, graupel)
ρHV (cont.)
• Independent of radar calibration
• Independent of hydrometeor concentration
• Immune to propagation effects
(Photos: Scott Ellis)
• NSF funded
• S-band dual polarization Doppler radar
• Highly mobile (fits in 6 sea containers)
• Antenna diameter 8.5 m
• Beam width 0.91 deg
• Range resolution 150 m
S-Pol (NCAR)
Chill (CSU)• NSF funded
• S-band dual polarization Doppler radar
• Antenna diameter 8.5 m
• Beam width (3 dB) 1.1 deg
• Range resolution 50, 75, 150 m
Dual-polarized Radar Systems(Polarization-agile/dual-receiver systems)
S-Pol
Chill
(Bringi and Chandrasekar, 2001)
Koun WSR-88D Radar(NSSL Norman, OK)
• Polarimetric upgrade of NEXRAD radar, completed in March 2002
• Simultaneous/hybrid transmission scheme
Wyoming King Air Cloud Radar (UW)
• K-band
• Dual/single polarization Doppler radar
• Beam width 0.4 – 0.8 deg (depending on antenna type)
• Antenna configurations down, side, up
NOAA Developments
• Millimeter-wave cloud radar (MMCR) to study the effects of clouds on climate and climate change
• Ground-based cloud radar for remote icing detection (GRIDS) to provide automated warnings of icing conditions
• Mobile X-band dual-polarization Doppler radar (Hydro-Radar) to study storm dynamics, boundary layer turbulence and ocean-surface characteristics
DLR
• C-band
• First meteorological radar system designed to measure time-series of “instantaneous” scattering matrices
Polarization variables from Cimmaron radar, which is located north of the squall line
Attenuation
radar
Note KDP vs Z estimate of rain
Hydrometeor classificationVivekanandan, Zrnić, Ellis, Oye, Ryzhkov, Straka, 1999: Cloud microphysical retrieval using S-band dual-polarization radar measurements. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 381-388.
• Algorithm runs in real time
• Based on a fuzzy logic method
Overall Design
5 observed and computed polarimetric variables
Temperature profile
Real time application
Hydrometeor type
Fuzzy logic technique
Result: For each volume element one particle type
Fuzzification
35 45 55 650
1
Reflectivity
-1 0 1 20
1
ZDR
-30 -25 -20 -150
1
LDR
rain
hailM
embe
rshi
p fu
ncti
ons
Z = 47 dBZ
ZDR = 1.2 dB
LDR = -24
Rain Hail
P= 0.8 0.2
P= 1 0
P= 0.5 0.1
Sum= 2.3 0.3
Other Algorithms
Precursor: Hard boundaries
Successor: neuro-fuzzy system (combination of neural network and fuzzy logic)
The performance of a fuzzy logic classifier depends critically on the membership functions. A neuro-fuzzy system learns from data and can adjust the membership functions.
Rainfall EstimationAttempt to solve the inverse electromagnetic problem of obtaining – resolution volume averaged – rainrates from backscatterer measurements such as Z, ZDR and KDP together with an underlying rain model.
One Z-R relationship used by WSR-88D radars:
R(Z) = 0.017 Z
• Requires accurate knowledge of the radar constant
• Prone to errors in absolute calibration
0.714
R(Z, ZDR) Algorithm
R = c1 Zh 10 [mm/h]a1 0.1 b1 ZDR
• ZDR can be measured accurately without being affected by absolute calibration errors
Table from Bringi and Chandrasekar, 2001
R(KDP) AlgorithmR = 40.5 (KDP) [mm/h]
0.85
• Valid for 10 cm wavelength and the Pruppacher and Beard model for the raindrop shape
•Unaffected by absolute calibration errors and attenuation
• Unbiased if rain is mixed with spherical hail
• KDP is relative noisy at low rainrates
• Estimated over finite path (trade off between accuracy and range resolution)
R(KDP, ZDR) Algorithm
R = c3 KDP 10 [mm/h]a3 0.1 b3 ZDR
• ZDR can be measured accurately without being affected by absolute calibration errors
Table from Bringi and Chandrasekar, 2001