dynamic model and mechanical properties of the two
TRANSCRIPT
Research ArticleDynamic Model and Mechanical Properties ofthe Two Parallel-Connected CRLD Bolts Verified withthe Impact Tensile Test
Liangjun Hao,1,2 Weili Gong ,1,2 Manchao He,1,2 Yanqi Song,1,2 and JiongWang1,2
1State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, Beijing 100083, China2School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Weili Gong; [email protected]
Received 1 June 2018; Accepted 3 September 2018; Published 4 October 2018
Academic Editor: Mijia Yang
Copyright Β© 2018 Liangjun Hao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Dynamic model was theoretically established for the two parallel-connected constant-resistance-large-deformation (CRLD) bolts,and the theoretical results were experimentally verifiedwith impact tensile tests on theCRLD bolts samples.The dynamic responsesof the double CRLD bolts were investigated under the impact loads with different intensities. The theoretical analyses showed that(1) under relatively small loading the CRLD bolts deform elastically and the deformation finally returns to zero and (2) under thehigh impact load, including the stable impact load and unstable impact load, the CRLD bolts export structural deformation afterthe initial elastic deformation. The deformation of the bolts eventually stabilizes at a certain amount of the elongation caused bythe relative sliding of the sleeves and rebars. The essential difference between the stable impact load and unstable impact load isthat, under the stable impact load, no structural deformation will occur after the impact load ends; under the unstable impact load,the structural deformation will still occur after the impact load ends. The obtained results are of theoretical implications for rocksupport design with CRLD bolts under the dynamical loading condition.
1. Introduction
With the increasing mining depths for both coal mines andmetal ore, tunnels being built in deep ground are oftensubjected to high stresses and complex geological conditions.Accordingly, surrounding rock masses in deep ground tendto experience various static and dynamic disasters such ascreep and rock bursts [1β4]. The constant-resistance-large-deformation bolt possesses more excellent performance thanthe traditional rebar in the areas of the control of roadwaywith slow and large deformation, the prevention of dynamicdisaster in deep mine, and the monitoring and early warningof landslide [5]. So far, there has been no a dynamic model forthe double CRLD bolts acting in parallel, which can be usedto explain the dynamic impact test results and recognize thedynamic response characteristics and furthermore providesguidance in the security and stability of the roadway support.
Over years, various ground support techniques and boltstructures have been developed for support and retention of
the newly exposed face surrounding the excavation in deepmines. Compared to the traditional strength bolt and yield-able bolt, the energy-absorbing bolt has both the strength ofthe former bolt and the deformation capacity of the latterone [6]. The energy-absorbing bolts that can meet the saidrequirement include the Garford Solid Dynamic Bolt [7, 8],Roffex [8], energy-absorbing rock bolt [9], cone bolt [10β12], MCB cone bolt (modified cone bolt with elongationas much as 180mm) [13, 14], and D bolt with large load-bearing and deformation (elongation as long as 400mm) [6].In order to adapt to the increasing demands for the supportsystem and bolt device in deep underground engineering, anovel bolt possessing ultrahigh energy-absorbing capacity bydeforming with an extraordinarily large elongation at highconstant resistance was developed by Manchao He, knownas the constant-resistance and large-deformation bolt (CRLDbolt in 2011) [15].
At present, the research progress on CRLD bolts mainlyfocuses on three aspects. (1) Theoretically, the constitutive
HindawiMathematical Problems in EngineeringVolume 2018, Article ID 1423613, 17 pageshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1423613
2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Anchored end Sleeve pipe Cone
Face pallet
Tightening nut
Shank rod
Constant-Resistance structureSeal grouting
Elongation
Figure 1: Schematic of the three-dimensional view for the CRLD bolt.
equation of the CRLD bolt under gradual loading is estab-lished, which proves the characteristics of constant resis-tance and large deformation of CRLD bolt [16]. (2) Interms of experimental studies, the CRLD bolt/cable statictensile tests verify the static constitutive equation [17] andin addition the CRLD bolt dynamic tensile tests embodythe energy-absorbing and anti-impacting performances andCRLD structural feature [18β21]. (3) In the project, the CRLDbolts are mainly used for the control of slow and largedeformation of deep soft rock roadway [5, 22, 23], roadwayeffective support under rock burst coal bump [2, 4β6, 9],and the monitoring and advance warning of the landslidein opencast mine [24, 25]. So far, there has been no atheoretically dynamic model of the double CRLDbolts actingin parallel for investigating the corresponding properties,except for experimental and engineering analysis [16].
In order to guide the support of the surrounding rockmass under the dynamic disasters in deep undergroundexcavation, the theoretical model for the double CRLD boltsacting in parallel under impact load is established accordingto the working principle and the impact tensile test of thedouble CRLD bolts support. After verifying the correctnessand stability of the theoretical model through experimentaldata, the dynamic response characteristics for the doubleCRLD bolts under the impact load with different intensitiesare further discussed.
2. Impact Tensile Test
2.1. Working Principle for Double CRLD Bolts Support.Figure 1 shows schematically the structure of the CRLDbolt which is actually a compound device consisting of thefollowing elements: a piston-like cone body installed on abolt shank (a rebar); a sleeve pipe with its inner diameterslightly smaller than the diameter of the large-end diameterof the cone; a face pallet and a tightening nut functioning asthe retention elements. The anchored end of the shank baris bonded by means of grout. When the axial external load(pull load) is applied on the far end (the face pallet end) of thebolt in the direction opposite to the anchored end, the sleevepipe will displace in the same direction relative to the conewhich is actually the elongation of theCRLDbolt.Themotionof the sleeve is equivalent to the displacement of the conerelative to the internal surface of the elastically deformablesleeve pipe. The small-end diameter of the cone is designedto be a little smaller than the internal diameter of the sleeve
in order to allow for the easy fitting of the cone body intothe pipe.The large-end diameter of the cone is slightly largerthan the inner diameter of the sleeve pipe in order to generatethe frictional resistance (i.e., the working resistance of theCRLD bolt) during the relative sliding between the cone andsleeve pipe.The elastic limit of the shank bar is more than thefrictional resistance. Thus the shank only deforms elasticallywhen the bolt is subjected to the external load.
Figure 2 demonstrates the working principle of the dou-ble CRLD bolts acting in parallel in stabilizing the surround-ing rockmass. It is considered that the double CRLDbolts areequivalent with the same geometric parameters and materialparameters and maintain simultaneous deformation duringthe support process. The anchored end is fixed inside thestable interior region by resin or cement grouts and the sleeveis located in the unstable surface region. The face pallet is inclose contact with the free surface of the surrounding rockmass and plays a supporting role on the roadway. During thedilation of the surrounding rock mass, the bolts system willrestrain the dilation so that a tensile load is induced at the facepallet end.
In the initial support process, the pull force exerted bythe pallet and nut on the sleeve pipe does not reach theconstant resistance force πππ which is the maximum staticfriction; when the cone slides inside the sleeve pipe, the sleevepipe, being relatively static with the cone in the directionopposite to anchored end of the bar, only exports elasticelongations of the shank rod as shown in Figure 2(a). If thepull force exerted by the pallet and nut on the sleeve pipeexceeds the constant resistance force πππ, the sleeve pipe willbe displaced in the direction opposite to anchored end ofthe bar, exporting elongations with structural deformation asshown in Figure 2(b).
2.2. Testing System andResults. Figure 3 illustrates the impacttensile test system of the double CRLD bolts acting inparallel (i.e., modified SHTB test system developed at StateKey Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep UndergroundEngineering in China University of Mining & TechnologyBeijing), which is specially used to explore the dynamiccharacteristics of the double bolts acting in parallel underimpact load. The double CRLD bolts impact tensile test sys-tem is mainly divided into three parts: Hopkinson dynamicloading system (Figure 3(a)(i)), double bolts impact ten-sile system (Figure 3(a)(ii)), and data acquisition system(Figure 3(a)(iii)).
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3
Stableinterior region
Unstablesurface region
Structural deformationwith cone sliding inside sleeve
Grout
Fixed end(a)
(b)
m
m
M
T
T
P(t)
Shank bar Cone
Sleeve pipe Face pallet
m
m
MP(t)
T
T
Elastic deformation with shank elongating
Figure 2: Working principle of the double CRLD bolts acting in parallel in stabilizing the surrounding rock mass: (a) initial support withelastic deformation of the double bolts and (b) late support with structural deformation of the double bolts.
Table 1: Material parameters of the CRLD bolt samples for experiment.
Rod and cone Sleeve PalletMaterial #45 steel #20 Ti steel SteelMass (Kg) 3.26 1.24 33.2Elastic modulus (GPa) 210 206 210Poissonβs ratio 0.269 0.3 0.3
Specifically the Hopkinson dynamic loading systemcontains the following sections: a loading system beingable to provide pressure range between 0 and 25MPa(Figure 3(b)(i)), a guidance system with length 3950mm(Figure 3(b)(ii)), and a bullet made of #35 CrMn steel (lengthπΏ is 800mm, diameter is 75mm, and quality is 27.6Kg)as shown in Figure 3(b)(iii). In detail double bolts impacttensile system consists of the following elements: an impactrod whose diameter is equal to that of the bullet (lengthis 1500mm, quality is 51.7Kg, density is 7800Kg/m3, andelastic stress wave velocity is 5190 m/s), two guide frameswiththe goal of supporting the impact rod coaxial with theloading system, and a fixed bearing functioning to fix theanchored ends of the double CRLD bolts (the guide framesand fixed bearing are all made of high-strength cast steel),two equivalent CRLD bolts samples with the same geometricparameters and material parameters (the parameters arepresented in Figure 4 and Table 1), the face pallet being ableto slide freely in the horizontal direction and involving threeforce sensors to measure impact load when impact rod ishit, and the tightening nut fixing the face pallet over thesleeve. Figure 3(b)(iv, viii) shows the double CRLD boltsimpact tensile system from different perspectives. The data
acquisition system includes speed monitor measuring thevelocity of the bullet rushing out of the bore (Figure 3(b)(v)),load monitor real-time displaying impact load exerted bythe impact rod on the face pallet (Figure 3(b)(vi)), anddisplacement monitor capturing the elongation of sleeve tailend in time (Figure 3(b)(vii)).
Figure 3(c) demonstrates the schematic view of theimpact tensile test of the double CRLD bolts acting in parallelin the vertical direction which is more convenient to under-stand the experimental process. After the erection of all theexperimental apparatus is completed, loading controller setsthe barometric pressure, and simultaneously the speed, load,and displacement monitor are ready to start sampling. Thepressure released by air cylinder pushes forward the bullet todo accelerated movement in the bore. The high-speed bulletthat rushes out of the bore strikes the impact rod whoseopposite end intimately contacts the face pallet, so the doubleCRLDboltswhose sleeve pipes are bonded to the face pallet inparallel by their nuts produce the corresponding mechanicalbehavior. During this process speed monitor records thevelocity at which the bullet hits the impact rod, load monitorreal-time records and images the load on the face palletthrough the force sensors, and simultaneously displacement
4 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Schematic view in the horizontal direction
i. Dynamic loading system ii. Double bolts impact tensile system
Fixed rodCRLD
bolt
Guide frame
Measuring velocity
Measuring load
Measuring elongation
iii. Data acquisition system
BoreAir cylinder
Bullet
Fixed bearing
Impact rod
Joint pipe
Force sensors
Protecting mask
(a)
i. Air cylinder ii. Bore iii. Bullet iv. Impact system
v. Speed monitor vi. Load monitor vii. Displacement monitor
viii. Impact system
Experimental instruments
(b)
Schematic view in the vertical direction
Face pallet
First CRLD bolt
Second CRLD bolt
Fixed bearing
Impact rodAir cylinder
Bullet
Fixed rod
(c)
Figure 3: Experimental setup for the impact tensile test of the double CRLD bolts: (a) schematic view in the horizontal direction; (b)experimental instruments; and (c) schematic view in the vertical direction.
Φ 22mm Φ 33mmΦ 25mm
Ξ¦ 24mm
Ξ¦ 165mm 270 mm
430mm
394mm
500mm 70mm
Ξ¦ 22mm
Figure 4: Geometric parameters of the double CRLD bolts samples for experiment.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 5
(0.30, 271.06)
Stable value0 KN
(1.97, 140.81)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110Time (ms)
β50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Load
(KN
)
Figure 5: Impact load-time curve for double CRLD bolts samplesacting in parallel. (The gas pressure is 1.0MPa and the speed of thebullet is 6.14m/s.)
monitor remembers and displays the elongation of the doublebolts tails.
Figure 5 shows the experimental impact load-time curvefor the double CRLD bolts samples in parallel. Intensity ofair source is applied at 1.0MPa and the strike speed of thebullet is measured as 6.14m/s. It can be seen that the loaddrastically attains the maximum value 271.06KNat amoment0.30ms in the time axis and sharply drops to the stable valueimmediately. Interestingly, the load reaches a second peakvalue 140.81KN when at 1.97ms.
3. Dynamic Model for Double CRLD BoltsActing in Parallel
The impact load is simulated by a trigonometric function forits mechanical properties of rapid rise and fall in a very shortperiod of time, and it can be expressed by
π (π‘) = ππ [1 + sin (ππ‘ β π2 )] (1)
where ππ and π determine the intensity and duration ofimpact load, respectively. Specifically, the intensity of impactload (denoted by ππππ₯) is ππππ₯ = 2ππ, and the duration ofimpact load (denoted by Ξπ‘) is Ξπ‘ = 2π/π. It can be seen thatthe impact load achieves the maximum value at the time ofπ/π from the curve of impact load as shown in Figure 6.
When the intensity of impact load varies, the forcecondition and motion situation of the CRLD bolts havegreat difference. Hence, the impact load is divided into threetypes in accordance with the different intensities. (i) For theelastic impact load, the CRLD bolts only deform elasticallyduring the entire process. (ii) For the stable impact load, thestructural deformation of the CRLD bolts is generated; thatis, the sleeve slides relatively to the cone. Notably, the relativeslippage has stopped when the impact load ends. (iii) Forunstable impact load, the CRLD bolts also produce structuraldeformation, but the relative sliding will continue after theimpact load is over. The force and deformation of the CRLD
P
Pmax
oΞt
2
Ξt t
P = Pm[1 + οΌοΌ£οΌ¨(tβ
2)]
Pmax = 2Pm
Ξt =2
Figure 6: The curve of impact load over time (ππππ₯ and Ξπ‘ are theintensity and duration of impact load, respectively).
bolts under the three kinds of impact load are discussed, andthe mechanical properties are further studied.
Figure 7 clearly explains the mechanical model of thedouble CRLD bolts acting in parallel under the elastic impactload. The sleeve and the shank rod always have no relativesliding, and only the shank rod is elastically elongated andcompressed. The motion of the double CRLD bolts consistsof two processes: the combined action of the impact loadand the internal force of the shank (see Figure 7(a)); then theinternal force of the shank alone (see Figure 7(b)). The boltsare in a state of rest at the initial moment, and the impactload begins to act on the face pallet, as shown in Figure 7(a).Under the impact load and the internal force of the shank, thedouble bolts elastically deform, as shown in Figure 7(b). Afterthe impact load is complete, the bolts oscillate elastically onlyunder the shank force, as shown in Figure 7(c).
The impact load π(π‘) is exerted on the face pallet alongthe direction of movement (i.e., t β€ Ξt), and the internalforces 2ππ₯ (π is the stiffness of the single shank) of the doubleshank rods are applied in the opposite direction of motion, asshown in Figure 7(b). The displacement of the double bolts,starting with the initial rest position, is represented by π₯. Aforce balance on the double bolts gives
(π + 2π) οΏ½οΏ½ = π (π‘) β 2ππ₯ (2)
where π is the mass of the shank and cone for the singleCRLD bolt and π is the mass of the face pallet and doublesleeves. The overdot denotes differentiation with respect tothe time, π‘.
Substituting (1) into (2) then can be rewritten into astandard form of second-order ordinary nonhomogeneousdifferential equation.
(π + 2π) οΏ½οΏ½ + 2ππ₯ = ππ sin (ππ‘ β π2 ) + ππ (3)
6 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
m
m
M
Original state
k
k
T=0
T=0
P(t)(a)
Shank bar Cone
Sleeve pipeFace pallet
m
m
M
k
k
T=kx
T=kx
P(t)(b)
ox
m
m
M
k
k
T=kx
T=kx
P(t)=0(c)
ox
Nomenclaturem - mass of single bolt shank and coneM - mass of double sleeve pipe and face palletT - elastic force of the shank barP - impact load
t - duration of the impact loadk - stiffness of the shank barx - elongation with the elastic deformation
Combined action of the impact load and the elastic force of the shank rod
Impact load turning into zero and only the elastic force of the shank rod
Pmax - intensity of the impact load
ending at =
β€
>
= =
P
Pmax
o Ξt
2
Ξt t
Figure 7: Mechanical model of double CRLD bolts under the elastic impact load: (a) original state of the double bolts; (b) combined actionof the impact load and the elastic force of the shank bar; and (c) only the elastic force of the shank bar.
The solution to (3), with the introduction of two freevariables πΆ1 and πΆ2, is
π₯ = πΆ1 sin (οΏ½οΏ½π‘) + πΆ2 cos (οΏ½οΏ½π‘)+ ππ2π β (π + 2π) π2 sin (ππ‘ β π2 ) + ππ2π
(4)
οΏ½οΏ½ = πΆ1οΏ½οΏ½ cos (οΏ½οΏ½π‘) β πΆ2οΏ½οΏ½ sin (οΏ½οΏ½π‘)+ πππ2π β (π + 2π) π2 cos (ππ‘ β π2 ) (5)
where
οΏ½οΏ½ = β 2ππ + 2π. (6)
For the initial conditions π₯ = οΏ½οΏ½ = 0 when π‘ = 0, the twofree variables can be given by the following.
πΆ1 = 0πΆ2 = ππ2π β (π + 2π)π2 β ππ2π
(7)
At the time of impact load ending, that is, t = Ξt, thedisplacement and velocity of the bolts, respectively, becomeπ₯Ξπ‘ = π₯(Ξπ‘) and οΏ½οΏ½Ξπ‘ = οΏ½οΏ½(Ξπ‘).
After the impact load is completed (i.e., t > Ξt), the boltscontinue to elastically deform under the internal forces of the
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7
shanks as shown in Figure 7(c). Another force balance givesthe following.
(π + 2π) οΏ½οΏ½ = β2ππ₯ (8)
The solution to (8), with the two free variables πΆ3 and πΆ4,is as follows.
π₯ = πΆ3 sin [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β Ξπ‘)] + πΆ4 cos [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β Ξπ‘)] (9)
οΏ½οΏ½ = πΆ3οΏ½οΏ½ cos [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β Ξπ‘)] β πΆ4οΏ½οΏ½ sin [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β Ξπ‘)] (10)
Substituting the continuity conditions π₯ = π₯Ξπ‘ and οΏ½οΏ½ =οΏ½οΏ½Ξπ‘ when π‘ = Ξπ‘ into (9) and (10), then the two free variablescan be given by the following.
πΆ3 = οΏ½οΏ½Ξπ‘οΏ½οΏ½πΆ4 = π₯Ξπ‘
(11)
Figure 8 clearly explains the mechanical model of thedouble CRLD bolts acting in parallel under the stable impactload. The double CRLD bolts not only generate elasticdeformation but also cause structural deformation.The sleevepipes slide with respect to the cones, and the relative slidinghas stopped when the impact load ends. The situationof force and motion for the double CRLD bolts can bedivided into four processes under the stable impact load: theelastic deformation (Figure 8(b)); the structural deformation(Figure 8(c)); the elastic recovery under the impact load andshank force (Figure 8(d)); and the elastic recovery under onlythe shank force (Figure 8(e)).
At the initial moment, the double bolts are at a state of restand the impact load begins to act on the face pallet, as shownin Figure 8(a). The double bolts deform elastically underthe impact load and shank force, as shown in Figure 8(b).Once the amount of the deformation exceeds the maximumelastic deformation of the CRLD bolt, implying that theinternal force of the shank exceeds the constant resistance ofthe CRLD bolt, the double bolts start to undergo structuraldeformation. The sleeves and the cones slide relative to eachother.The sleeves continue tomove forward under the impactload and sliding friction, while the cones oscillate back andforth under the shank force and sliding friction, as shown inFigure 8(c).The speed of the sleeves gradually decreases sincethe impact load on the sleeves gradually decreases at a laterstage and the sliding friction remains unchanged. When thespeed of the sleeve pipes is reduced to zero, the relative slidingis completed. At this moment, the impact load continues towork.The double CRLD bolts produce elastic elongation andcompression under the impact load and shank force until theend of the impact load, as shown in Figure 8(d). After theimpact load is over, the bolts continue to deform elasticallyunder the internal force of the shank along, as shown inFigure 8(e).
In the initially elastic deformation stage (i.e., π₯ β€ π₯ππ,and π₯ππ is the amount of maximum elastic deformation ofthe CRLD bolt corresponding to the constant resistance),as shown in Figure 8(b), the double bolts elastically deformunder the impact load and the shank force. Therefore,
the force balance equation is equivalent to (2), and thedisplacement-time relationship and velocity-time relation-ship of the bolts in initially elastic stage under stable impactload are (4) and (5), respectively.
Under the elastic impact load, the bolts do not reachthe maximum elastic deformation during the whole impactprocess. Different from the elastic impact load, the bolts reachthe amount π₯ππ of maximum elastic deformation at the end ofthe initial phase under the stable impact load. It can be seenthat the end time of the initial phase (denoted by π‘1) satisfiesπ₯(π‘1) = π₯1 = π₯ππ. The maximum elastic deformation is givenby (for details see [16])
π₯ππ = ππππ (12)
πππ = 2ππΌπ πΌππ (13)
where πππ is the constant resistance of the CRLD bolt, πΌπ isthe sleeve elastic constant, πΌπ is the cone geometrical constant,and π is the coefficient of the static friction.
After the initial phase is completed, the speed of sleeveand shank becomes as follows.
οΏ½οΏ½1 = π₯ (π‘1)= [ππ2π β ππ2π β (π + 2π) π2 ] οΏ½οΏ½ sin (οΏ½οΏ½π‘1)
+ πππ2π β (π + 2π) π2 cos(ππ‘1 β π2 )(14)
Once the bolts deform beyond the maximum elasticdeformation, implying that the internal force in the shank rodexceeds the constant resistance, the bolts begin to producestructural deformation by the relative sliding of the sleeveand shank, as shown in Figure 8(c). The force condition andmovement situation become different as the sleeve and shankare no longer relatively stationary. For the sleeves and facepallet, the impact load is exerted in the direction ofmovementand the sliding friction is applied in the opposite direction,satisfying the equation
ποΏ½οΏ½ = π (π‘) β 2πΉπ (15)
where πΉπ is the sliding friction force between the shankand sleeve and given by (for details see [16])
πΉπ = 2ππΌπ πΌπππ (16)
where ππ is the coefficient of dynamic friction betweenthem. Solving (15), we can get the displacement-time relation-ship and speed-time relationship of the bolts in the structuraldeformation stage under stable impact load:
π₯ = β ππππ2 sin (ππ‘ β π2 ) + ππ β 2πΉπ2π π‘2 + πΆ5π‘ + πΆ6 (17)
οΏ½οΏ½ = β ππππ cos(ππ‘ β π2 ) + ππ β 2πΉππ π‘ + πΆ5 (18)
where πΆ5 and πΆ6 are two free variables. Substituting thecontinuity conditions π₯ = π₯1 and π₯ = π₯1 when π‘ = π‘1 into
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
m
m
MOriginal state
k
k
T=0
T=0
(a)
Shank bar Cone
Sleeve pipe Face pallet
m
m
Mk
k
T=kx
T=kx
(b)
o
m
m
Mk
k(c)
o
Elongation with only elastic deformation of the shank bar
Elongation with structural deformation (i.e. relative sliding of the cone and
o
m
m
Mk
kP(t)
P(t)
P(t)
(d)
o x
x
x
xm
o
Joint action of the impact load and the elastic force of the shank rod
m
m
Mk
kP(t)=0
P(t)=0
(e)
o x
o
Impact load turning into zero and only the elastic force of the shank rod
Nomenclaturem - mass of single bolt shank and coneM - mass of double sleeve pipe and face palletT - elastic force of the shank barP - impact load
k - stiffness of the shank barx - elongation with the elastic deformation
- duration of the impact load
β maximum elastic deformation of the bolt
Pmax- intensity of the impact load = =
>
β€
ending at =
β€
>
=sleeve pipe) ending at = and
P
Pmax
o tΞt
2
Ξt
=(--+)
=(--+)
=(--+)
=(--+)
=(-)
=(-)
+
+
Figure 8: Mechanical model of double CRLD bolts under the stable impact load: (a) original state of the double bolts; (b) initially elasticdeformation stage; (c) structural deformation stage; (d) late elastic oscillation stage under the combined action of the impact load and theelastic force of the shank bar; and (e) late elastic oscillation stage only under the elastic force of the shank bar.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 9
(17) and (18), then the two free variables can be obtained asfollows.
πΆ5 = οΏ½οΏ½1 + ππππ cos (ππ‘1 β π2 ) β ππ β 2πΉππ π‘1πΆ6 = π₯1 + ππππ2 sin (ππ‘1 β π2 ) β ππ β 2πΉπ2π π‘2
1β πΆ5π‘1
(19)
When the velocity of the sleeves is reduced to zero, thesleeves and the shanks stop sliding relative to each other,and the bolts no longer produce structural deformation. Itcan be seen that the end time of the structural deformationphase, denoted by π‘2, satisfies οΏ½οΏ½(π‘2) = 0. At this time, thedisplacement of the sleeves and face pallet, denoted by π₯2,becomes π₯2 = π₯(π‘2).
On the other hand, the shanks and cones oscillate backand forth under the shank forces and sliding friction duringthe structural deformation phase. The force balance on thecones gives
ποΏ½οΏ½π = π (π₯1 β π₯π) β πΉπ (20)
where π₯π is the displacement of the cones during thestructural deformation stage starting from the end of theinitial elastic phase. Substituting (12), (13), and (16) into (20),then we can have the following.
ποΏ½οΏ½π + ππ₯π = 2ππΌπ πΌπ (π β ππ) (21)
It is convenient to use the elapsed time π since theinitial movement of the cones and shanks as the independentvariable; that is, π = π‘ β π‘1, so the solution to (21) is
π₯π = πΆ7 sin (ππ) + πΆ8 cos (ππ) + 2ππΌπ πΌπ (π β ππ)π (22)
οΏ½οΏ½π = πΆ7π cos (ππ) β πΆ8π sin (ππ) (23)
where πΆ7 and πΆ8 are two free variables and π = βπ/π.Substituting the initial conditions π₯π = 0 and οΏ½οΏ½π = π₯1 whenπ = 0 into (22) and (23), then the two free variables can begiven by the following.
πΆ7 = π₯1ππΆ8 = β2ππΌπ πΌπ (π β ππ)π
(24)
Substitute π = π‘βπ‘1 into (22) and (23); then the expressionof the displacement of the cone with respect to the variable π‘will be
π₯π = οΏ½οΏ½1π sin [π (π‘ β π‘1)]β 2ππΌπ πΌπ (π β ππ)π cos [π (π‘ β π‘1)]+ 2ππΌπ πΌπ (π β ππ)π
(25)
and the relationship between the velocity of the cone andthe time π‘ will be as follows.
οΏ½οΏ½π = οΏ½οΏ½1 cos [π (π‘ β π‘1)]+ 2πππΌπ πΌπ (π β ππ)π sin [π (π‘ β π‘1)] (26)
At the end time of the structural deformation, thedisplacement of the cone (denoted by π₯π) becomes
π₯π = π₯π (π‘2) (27)
and the speed of the cone (denoted by Vπ) changes intothe following.
Vπ = οΏ½οΏ½π (π‘2) (28)
When the speed of the sleeves is reduced to zero, thesleeves and shanks stop sliding relative to each other andbegin tomove together. According to the law of conservationof momentum, the common velocity (denoted by Vπ+π) ofthem satisfies the following.
2πVπ = (π + 2π) Vπ+π (29)
The solution to (29) is as follows.
Vπ+π = 2ππ + 2πVπ (30)
Under the stable impact load, the impact load still existsat the end of the structural deformation of the bolts; that is,π‘2 β€ Ξπ‘. The double CRLD bolts oscillate elastically underthe impact load and shank force, as shown in Figure 8(d). Letπ₯π+π denote the common displacement of the sleeves andshanks during the elastic oscillation starting from the end ofthe structural deformation. The force balance gives
(π + 2π) οΏ½οΏ½π+π = 2π (π₯1 β π₯π β π₯π+π) β π (π‘) (31)
Substituting (1) into (31), it can be rewritten into astandard form of second-order ordinary nonhomogeneousdifferential equation.
(π + 2π) οΏ½οΏ½π+π + 2ππ₯π+π= 2π (π₯1 β π₯π) β ππ [1 + sin (ππ‘ β π2 )] (32)
Solving (32), we can obtain the displacement-time rela-tionship and speed-time relationship of the bolts during theelastic oscillation under the impact load and shank force
π₯π+π = πΆ9 sin [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β π‘2)] + πΆ10 cos [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β π‘2)]+ ππ(π + 2π) π2 β 2π sin (ππ‘ β π2 )+ 2π (π₯1 β π₯π) β ππ2π
(33)
οΏ½οΏ½π+π = πΆ9οΏ½οΏ½ cos [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β π‘2)] β πΆ10οΏ½οΏ½ sin [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β π‘2)]+ πππ(π + 2π) π2 β 2π cos (ππ‘ β π2 ) (34)
10 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
where πΆ9 and πΆ10 are two free variables. Substituting thecontinuity conditions π₯π+π = 0 and οΏ½οΏ½π+π = Vπ+π whenπ‘ = π‘2 into (33) and (34), then the two free variables can beobtained by the following.
πΆ9 = 1π [Vπ+π β πππ(π + 2π)π2 β 2π cos (ππ‘2 β π2 )]πΆ10
= β ππ(π + 2π) π2 β 2π sin (ππ‘2 β π2 )β 2π (π₯1 β π₯π) β ππ2π
(35)
When the impact load is over (π‘ = Ξπ‘), the commondisplacement of the sleeves and the shanks becomes
π₯π+πΞπ‘
= π₯π+π (Ξπ‘) (36)
and their common velocity turns into the following.
π₯π+πΞπ‘
= οΏ½οΏ½π+π (Ξπ‘) (37)
At the subsequent times (i.e., π‘ > Ξπ‘), the sleeves andshanks continue to oscillate elastically only under the internalforces of the shanks, satisfying the following equation.
(π + 2π) οΏ½οΏ½π+π = 2π (π₯1 β π₯π β π₯π+π) (38)
The solution to (38), with two free variables πΆ11 and πΆ12,is as follows.
π₯π+π = πΆ11 sin [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β Ξπ‘)] + πΆ12 cos [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β Ξπ‘)]+ (π₯1 β π₯π) (39)
οΏ½οΏ½π+π = πΆ11οΏ½οΏ½ cos [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β Ξπ‘)] β πΆ12οΏ½οΏ½ sin [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β Ξπ‘)] (40)
Substituting the continuity conditions π₯π+π = π₯π+πΞπ‘
andοΏ½οΏ½π+π = οΏ½οΏ½π+πΞπ‘
when π‘ = Ξπ‘ into (39) and (40), then the twofree variables can be obtained as follows.
πΆ11 = οΏ½οΏ½π+πΞπ‘οΏ½οΏ½
πΆ12 = π₯π+πΞπ‘
β (π₯1 β π₯π)(41)
As a further result, the displacement π₯ of the bolts duringthe elastic oscillation relative to the initial position of thewhole process can be given by the following.
π₯ = π₯2 β π₯π+π (42)
Figure 9 clearly explains the mechanical model of thedouble CRLD bolts acting in parallel under the unstableimpact load. The double bolts also produce structural defor-mation, and the sleeves and shanks slide relative to each other.However, unlike under the stable impact load, the structuraldeformation caused by relative sliding continues to occurafter the impact load is completed. The situation of force andmotion for the double CRLD bolts can also be divided intofour processes under the unstable impact load: the elastic
deformation (Figure 9(b)); the structural deformation underthe impact load and shank forces (Figure 9(c)); the structuraldeformation under the shank forces alone (Figure 9(d)); andthe elastic recovery (Figure 9(e)).
At the initial moment, the double bolts are at a state of restand the impact load begins to act on the face pallet, as shownin Figure 9(a). The double bolts deform elastically underthe impact load and shank forces, as shown in Figure 9(b).Once the amount of the deformation exceeds the maximumelastic deformation of the CRLD bolt, implying that theinternal force in the shank exceeds the constant resistance ofthe CRLD bolt, the double bolts start to undergo structuraldeformation. The sleeves and the cones slid relative to eachother.The sleeves continue tomove forward under the impactload and the sliding friction, while the cones oscillate backand forth under the shank forces and the sliding friction,as shown in Figure 9(c). When the impact load is over, therelative movement of the sleeves and cones does not stop,and the structural deformation continues to occur underonly the shank forces. The sleeves still move forward underthe sliding friction, while the cones still oscillate back andforth, as shown in Figure 9(d). The speed of the sleeve pipesgradually decreases due to the sliding friction. When thespeed is reduced to zero, the structural deformation caused bythe relative sliding no longer occurs. The sleeves and shanksbegin to recover elastically under the internal forces of theshanks, as shown in Figure 9(e).
In the initially elastic deformation stage (i.e., π₯ β€ π₯ππ),as shown in Figure 9(b), the double bolts elastically deformunder the unstable impact load and the shank forces. It iscompletely equivalent to the initial stage under the stableimpact load.
Once the bolts deform beyond the maximum elasticdeformation π₯ππ, meaning that the internal force in the shankrod exceeds the constant resistance πππ, the bolts begin toproduce structural deformation by the relative sliding of thesleeve and shank (Figure 9(c)). The situation of the force andmotion becomes different as the sleeve and shank are nolonger relatively stationary. For the sleeves and face pallet,the impact load is exerted in the direction of movementand the sliding friction is applied in the opposite direction.Therefore, the force balance equation is equivalent to (15),and the displacement-time relationship and velocity-timerelationship of the bolts in the structural deformation stageunder the unstable impact load and shank forces are (17) and(18), respectively.
Under the stable impact load, the structural deformationis completed before the end of the impact load. Differently,under the unstable impact load, the structural deformationcontinues to occur after the impact load is over. At the timeof the impact load ending, i.e., π‘ = Ξπ‘, the displacement of thesleeves and pallet changes intoπ₯Ξπ‘ = π₯ (Ξπ‘)
= ππππ2 + ππ β 2πΉπ2π (2ππ )2 + πΆ5 2ππ + πΆ6 (43)
and the velocity of them turns into the following.
οΏ½οΏ½Ξπ‘ = οΏ½οΏ½ (Ξπ‘) = ππ β 2πΉππ 2ππ + πΆ5 (44)
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 11
m
m
M
Original state
k
k
T=0
T=0
(a)
Shank bar Cone
Sleeve pipe Face pallet
m
m
Mk
k
T=kx
T=kx
(b)
o
m
m
Mk
k(c)
o
Elongation with only elastic deformation of the shank bar
Elongation with structural deformation under only the elastic force of the shank
o
(d)
o
k
k(e)
o
o
Elastic oscillation of the fact pallet and the cone together
o
m
m
Mk
k
Elongation with structural deformation under the impact load and the elastic
m
m
M
Nomenclaturem - mass of single bolt shank and coneM - mass of double sleeve pipe and face palletT - elastic force of the shank barP - impact load
k - stiffness of the shank barx - elongation with the elastic deformation
- duration of the impact load
β maximum elastic deformation of the bolt
Pmax- intensity of the impact load()=
()=
()=
()
()
=(-)
=(-)
=(-)
=(-)
+
x
xm
xm
x
x
bar ending at = and =
>
force of the shank bar ending at =
> and β€
ending at =
β€
= =
P
Pmax
otΞt
2
Ξt
=(--+)
=(--+)
Figure 9: Mechanical model of double CRLD bolts under the unstable impact load: (a) original state of the double bolts; (b) initially elasticdeformation stage; (c) structural deformation stage under the combined action of the impact load and the elastic force of the shank rod; (d)structural deformation stage only under the elastic force of the shank bar; and (e) late elastic oscillation stage.
12 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
After the impact load is over, i.e., π‘ > Ξπ‘, the sleeves con-tinue to slide forward with respect to the shanks resulting inthe structural deformation (Figure 9(d)). At the subsequenttimes, the sleeves and pallet under only the sliding frictionsatisfy the following equation.
ποΏ½οΏ½ = β2πΉπ (45)
Solving (45), we can obtain the displacement-time rela-tionship and speed-time relationship of the sleeves after theimpact load ending:
π₯ = βπΉπππ‘2 + πΆ13π‘ + πΆ14 (46)
οΏ½οΏ½ = β2πΉππ π‘ + πΆ13 (47)
where πΆ13 and πΆ14 are two free variables. Substituting thecontinuity conditions π₯ = π₯Ξπ‘ and οΏ½οΏ½ = οΏ½οΏ½Ξπ‘ when π‘ = Ξπ‘into (46) and (47), then the two variables can be given by thefollowing.
πΆ13 = οΏ½οΏ½Ξπ‘ + 2πΉππ Ξπ‘πΆ14 = π₯Ξπ‘ + πΉππΞπ‘2 β πΆ13Ξπ‘
(48)
The velocity of the sleeves gradually decreases due to thesliding friction in the opposite direction of the movement.When the speed is reduced to zero, the sleeves and shanksstop sliding relative to each other, and the bolts no longerproduce structural deformation. It can be seen that the endtime of the structural deformation, denoted by π‘2, satisfiesοΏ½οΏ½(π‘2) = 0. At this time, the displacement of the sleeves,denoted by π₯2, becomes π₯2 = π₯(π‘2).
During the entire process of the structural deformation,including the deformation under the impact load and shankforces (Figure 9(c)) as well as the deformation under onlythe shank forces (Figure 9(d)), the shanks and cones alwaysoscillate back and forth under the internal forces of theshanks and sliding frictions. It is equivalent to the structuraldeformation phase under the stable impact load. Similarly,π₯πis used to represent the displacement of the cones during thewhole process of structural deformation starting from the endof the initial elastic phase, and π = π‘ β π‘1. It can be seen thatthe displacement of the cones satisfies (20).The displacementπ₯π and the velocity οΏ½οΏ½π of the cones with respect to the timevariable π‘ are, respectively, (25) and (26).
At the end time of the structural deformation caused bythe relative sliding of the sleeves and cones, the displacementand velocity of the cones are, respectively, (27) and (28). Itneeds special attention that π‘2 > Ξπ‘ under unstable impactload and π‘2 β€ Ξπ‘ under the stable impact load. This isthe essential difference between the unstable impact loadand stable impact load: under the unstable impact load, thestructural deformation will still occur after the impact loadends; under the stable impact load, no structural deformationwill occur after the impact load ends.
After the structural deformation of the bolts is completed,the bolts oscillate elastically under only the internal forces
of the shank rods (Figure 9(e)). Similarly, let π₯π+π denotethe common displacement of the sleeves and shanks duringthe elastic oscillation starting from the end of the structuraldeformation. The force balance of the bolts gives the follow-ing.
(π + 2π) π₯π+π = 2π (π₯1 β π₯π β π₯π+π) (49)
Solving (49), we can obtain the displacement-time rela-tionship and speed-time relationship of the bolts during theelastic oscillation under the unstable impact load and shanksforces
π₯π+π = πΆ15 sin [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β π‘2)] + πΆ16 cos [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β π‘2)]+ (π₯1 β π₯π) (50)
οΏ½οΏ½π+π = πΆ15οΏ½οΏ½ cos [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β π‘2)] β πΆ16οΏ½οΏ½ sin [οΏ½οΏ½ (π‘ β π‘2)] (51)
where πΆ15 and πΆ16 are two free variables. Substituting thecontinuity conditions π₯π+π = 0 and οΏ½οΏ½π+π = Vπ+π when π‘ =π‘2 into (50) and (51), then the two variables can be obtainedby the following.
πΆ15 = Vπ+ποΏ½οΏ½πΆ16 = β (π₯1 β π₯π)
(52)
As a further result, the displacement π₯ of the bolts duringthe elastic oscillation relative to the initial position of thewhole process can be given by the following.
π₯ = π₯2 β π₯π+π (53)
In particular, the second peak in the load-time curve isdue to the face pallet hitting the impact rod during the elasticrecovery. In the impact tensile test for the double CRLD boltsacting in parallel, the bullet hits the impact rod and the firstpeak is formed on the face pallet that is in close contact withthe impact rod. Subsequently, the CRLD bolts start to moveand the impact rod remains approximately stationary. Afterthe deformation of the bolts reaches the maximum value, thebolts recover elastically in the opposite direction. The secondpeak is generated when pallet hits the impact rod locatedin initial position again. The intensity of the second pulseis determined by the internal forces of the shanks when thedeformation of the bolts reaches the maximum.
Under the elastic impact load, the bolts only deformelastically and the sleeves and shanks are always relativelystationary. When the deformation of the bolts is maximum,the internal forces in the shanks of the double bolts, that is,the intensity of the second pulse, can be given by
ππππ₯2 = 2π β max (π₯) (54)
where ππππ₯2 is the intensity of the second pulse loadand max(π₯) denotes the maximum deformation of the boltsduring the whole process.
When the pallet recovers and reaches the initial position,the speed of the bolts attains a minimum value which is
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 13
Table 2: Experimental and calculated data under three gas pressures to determine the transmission coefficients.
Gas pressure (MPa) Bullet velocity (m/s) Shock wave in impact rod Shock wave in face pallet RatiosDuration (ms) Intensity (KN) Duration (ms) Intensity (KN) K1 K2
1.5 10.97 0.31 980.96 0.45 505.58 1.45 0.521.8 12.60 0.31 1126.70 0.45 610.89 1.45 0.542.0 14.48 0.31 1294.80 0.45 740.69 1.45 0.57
a negative value indicating the maximum speed in reverse.Therefore, the starting time π of the second pulse satisfies
π₯ (π) = min (οΏ½οΏ½) (55)
where π is starting time of the second pulse load andmin(οΏ½οΏ½) denotes the minimum speed of the bolts during thewhole process.
Under the stable impact load and unstable impact load,the bolts produce structural deformation, and the sleevesslide relative to the shanks.When the deformation of the boltsis maximum, the deformation of the shank is π₯ππ β π₯π; hencethe intensity of the second pulse load is as follows.
ππππ₯2 = 2π (π₯ππ β π₯π) (56)
Different from being under the elastic impact load, whenthe speed of the bolts reaches aminimumvalue, the bolts onlycomplete the recovery of elastic deformation and the boltsdo not return to the initial position due to the presence ofstructural deformation. At the subsequent times, the palletcontinues to move in the maximum speed in reverse untilit collides with the impact rod resulting in the second pulseload. The starting time π of the second pulse is
π = π1 + π2 (57)
where π1 is the time when the speed of the bolts reachesthe minimum value, and satisfies π₯(π1) = min(οΏ½οΏ½). π2 is thetime from the bolts speed reaching the minimum value to thepallet hitting the impact rod and satisfies π2 = β[max(π₯) βπ₯(π1)]/min(οΏ½οΏ½).4. Verification of the Theoretical Results withImpact Tensile Test
In the impact tensile test for the double CRLD bolts actingin parallel, the bullet hits the impact rod and the shock waveis generated in the impact rod. According to the traditionalSHPB experimental theory [26, 27], the duration Ξπ‘β of theshock wave in the impact rod can be calculated by
Ξπ‘β = 2ππ (58)
where π is the length of the bullet equal to 800mm and c isthe speed of the elastic stress wave in the impact rod equal to5190m/s. The intensity πβ
πππ₯of the shock wave in the impact
rod can be given by
πβπππ₯
= 12ππVs (59)
where V is the striking velocity of the bullet equal to17.94m/s, π is the density of the impact rod equal to7800 kg/π3, and s is their contact area (i.e., the same cross-sectional area of the bullet and the impact rod) and can beobtained by the following.
s = π(0.0752 )2 β 0.00441786 (π3) (60)
When the shock wave in the impact rod propagates to thecontact surface with the face pallet, a portion of the energy isprojected into the face pallet, so that the double CRLD boltsacting in parallel produce corresponding responses. Let πΎ1represent the ratio of the duration Ξπ‘ of the shock wave inface pallet relative to Ξπ‘β, and let πΎ2 denote the ratio of theintensity ππππ₯ of the shock wave in the face pallet relative toπβπππ₯
; then we can have the following.
Ξπ‘ = πΎ1 β Ξπ‘β (61)
ππππ₯ = πΎ2 β πβπππ₯ (62)
In order to determine the ratios πΎ1 and πΎ2, the impacttensile tests for the double CRLD bolts acting in parallelat the gas pressures of 1.5MPa, 1.8MPa, and 2.0MPa wereperformed. Monitoring the striking velocities of the bulletat the three different gas pressures, then the durations andthe intensities of the shock waves in the impact rod canbe calculated by (58) and (59), respectively. Based on themeasured durations and intensities of the shock waves in theface pallet, the correspondingπΎ1 andπΎ2 can be obtained (thespecific data is shown in Table 2).
Taking the average values of πΎ1 and πΎ2 as their referencevalues, and thenπΎ1 = 1.45 andπΎ2 = 0.54. From (58) and (61),the duration of the shock wave in face pallet at the 1.0MPa gaspressure can be obtained by the following.
Ξπ‘ = 1.45 Γ 2 β 0.85190 β 0.45 Γ 10β3 (s) = 0.45 (ms) (63)
The intensity of the shock wave in the pallet, from (59)and (62), can be obtained by the following.
ππππ₯ = 0.54 Γ 12 Γ 7800 Γ 5190 Γ 6.14 Γ 0.0044β 2.9649 Γ 105 (N) = 296.49 (KN)
(64)
Combined with the other physical parameters of thespecimens for CRLD bolts (see Table 3), the theoretical load-time curve for the double CRLDbolts acting in parallel underimpact load can be obtained, as shown in Figure 10. The
14 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Table 3: Parameters used in drawing the analytical curve.
Parameter valueConstant resistance πππ (KN) 184.17Corresponding displacement on constantresistance π₯ππ (mm) 2.3
Coefficient on intensity of impact load ππ (KN) 148.245Coefficient on duration of impact load π (1/ms) 13.96Mass of single bolt shank and coneπ (Kg) 3.26Mass of double sleeve and pallet π (Kg) 35.68Stiffness of the shank π (KN/mm) 79.8Sleeve elastic constant πΌ
π (N/m3) 1.003 Γ 1011
Cone geometrical constant πΌπ (m3) 2.902 Γ 10β6
Static frictional coefficientπ 0.1007Dynamic frictional coefficientππ 0.0879
(0.30, 271.06)
(0.225, 296.49)
Experimental dataAnalytical data
(1.97, 140.81)
(2.07, 114.63)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110Time (ms)
β50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Load
(KN
)
Figure 10: Comparison of experimental data and analytical dataabout the load of the double CRLDbolts. (The gas pressure is 1.0MPaand the speed of the bullet is 6.14m/s.)
load reaches the maximum value 296.49KN at 0.225ms andattains the second peak value 114.63KN at 2.07ms. From thecomparison of the experimental data and the analytical dataabout the load of the double CRLD bolts, it can be seen thattheir change trends and the two peak values are basicallyconsistent, which indicate the correctness and reliability ofthe theoretically dynamic model.
5. Discussion about the Dynamic Responses ofthe Double CRLD Bolts
In order to investigate the mechanical responses of thedouble CRLD bolts acting in parallel under impact loadswith different intensities and an identical duration (Ξt =2ms), it is quite necessary to determine the correspondingranges of the intensities of the three different types of impactload (the specific values as shown in Table 4). Specificallywe, respectively, choose one from each of the three types of
impact load for comparison and analysis, which possesses theintensities of 100KN, 250KN, and 800KN (see Figures 11, 12,and 13, respectively).
In particular, it has been known that the second pulsein the load-time curve of the CRLD bolts is caused bythe experimental equipment. It does not belong to themechanical properties of the CRLD bolts. Therefore, it is notconsidered for the second pulse in the following analysis.
Figure 11(a) shows the displacement-time curve and theload-time curve of the CRLD bolts under the impact loadwith the intensity 100KN and the duration 2ms. The max-imum displacement 1.06mm of the bolts does not reachthe maximum elastic displacement 2.3mm, so there is norelative sliding of the sleeves and the shanks, only the elastictension and compression of the shanks themselves during theentire impact process. Both the load and the displacementof the bolts eventually become zero when the bolts tendto be stable. Figure 11(b) indicates the load-displacementcurve of the CRLD bolts under the elastic impact load. Theload firstly rises and then decreases with the increase ofthe displacement. However after the displacement reachesthe maximum value, the load begins to reduce with thedecrease of the displacement. Furthermore, the time of thedisplacement reaching its peak significantly lags behind thetime of the load achieving its maximum.
Figure 12(a) illustrates the displacement-time curve andthe load-time curve of the CRLD bolts under the impactload with the intensity 250KN and the duration 2ms. Themaximum displacement 2.74mm of the CRLD bolts exceedsthe maximum elastic displacement 2.3mm, so the boltsproduce structural deformation caused by the relative slidingof the sleeves and shanks. Specifically the sleeves and shanksbegin to slide relative to each other at 1.31mswhen the internalforce of the shank reaches the constant resistance 184.17KNas well as with the corresponding displacement 2.3mm. Therelative sliding ends at 1.61ms, at which the bolts achievethe maximum displacement. The impact load still continuesuntil it becomes zero at 2ms. The relative sliding has stoppedbefore the end of the impact load, which indicates the impactbeing the stable impact load. In addition the displacementfinally stabilized at 1.06mm after the oscillation.
Figure 12(b) indicates the load-displacement curve of theCRLDbolts under the stable impact load.The load firstly risesand then decreases with the increase of the displacement.However after the displacement reaches the maximum value,the load begins to reduce with the decrease of the displace-ment. Furthermore, the time of the displacement reaching itspeak significantly lags behind the time of the load achievingits maximum.
Figure 13(a) shows the displacement-time curve and theload-time curve of the CRLD bolts under the impact loadwith the intensity 800KN and the duration 2ms. The max-imum displacement 31.67mm of the CRLD bolt exceeds themaximum elastic displacement 2.3mm, so the bolts alsoproduce structural deformation caused by the relative slidingof the sleeves and shanks. Specifically the sleeves and shanksstart to slide relative to each other at 0.82ms when theinternal force of the shank reaches the constant resistance184.17KN as well as with the corresponding displacement
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 15
Table 4: Critical ranges for three different types of impact load.
Type Load intensities (KN) CharacteristicElastic impact load ππππ₯ β€ 218.74 Only elastic deformations without structural deformationsStable impact load 218.75 β€ ππππ₯ β€ 412.18 End of structural deformations earlier than end of impactUnstable impact load ππππ₯ β₯ 412.19 End of structural deformations later than end of impact
Displacement-time curveLoad-time curve
Elastic impact load(1.54, 1.06)
Ending of impact load
0 mm
β1.0β0.5
0.00.51.0
Disp
lace
men
t (m
m)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 220Time (ms)
β200β150β100β50050100150200250
Load
(KN
)Pmax β€ 218.74 KN
(a)
Maximum displacement
Ending of impact load
Maximum load
Load-displacement curve
020406080
100
Load
(KN
)
0.750.500.250.00 1.00 1.25β0.50β0.75 β0.25β1.00Displacement (mm)
(b)
Figure 11: Curves for double CRLD bolts acting in parallel under impact load with intensity 100KN and duration 2ms: (a) displacement-timecurve and Load-time curve and (b) load-displacement curve.
Displacement-time curveLoad-time curve
Stable impact load
(1.61, 2.74)Ending of impact load
Starting of relative slidingEnding of relative sliding
1.06 mm
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 180 2220Time (ms)
β0.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.0
Disp
lace
men
t (m
m)
β1000100200300400
Load
(KN
)218.75 KN β€ Pmax β€ 412.18 KN
(a)
Load-displacement curve
Ending of relative sliding with maximum
displacement
Ending of impact load
Starting of relative sliding
Maximum load
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0β0.5Displacement (mm)
050
100150200250
Load
(KN
)
(b)
Figure 12: Curves for double CRLD bolts acting in parallel under impact load with intensity 250KN and duration 2ms: (a) displacement-timecurve and Load-time curve and (b) load-displacement curve.
2.3mm. Although the impact load is completed at 2ms, therelative sliding of the sleeves and shanks does not stop. Therelative slippage still continues until 3.06ms, at which thebolts reach themaximumdisplacement 31.67mm.The relativesliding still takes place after the end of the impact load, whichdemonstrates the impact being the unstable impact load. Inaddition the displacement finally stabilized at 28.87mm afterthe oscillation.
Figure 13(b) indicates the load-displacement curve of theCRLD bolts under the unstable impact load. The load firstrapidly rises and then slowly decreases with the increase ofthe displacement. Interestingly, the displacement continuesto increase after the ending of the impact load. Furthermore,the time of the displacement reaching its peak signifi-cantly lags behind the time of the load achieving its maxi-mum.
16 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Load
(KN
)
Displacement-time curveLoad-time curve
Unstable impact load
(3.06, 31.67)
Ending of impact load
Starting of relative sliding
Ending of relative sliding28.87 mm
05
101520253035
Disp
lace
men
t (m
m)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 220Time (ms)
0150300450600750900
Pmax β₯ 412.19 KN
(a)
0150300450600750900
Load
(KN
)
Load-displacement curve
Ending of relative sliding with maximum displacement Ending of impact load
Maximum load
Starting of relative sliding
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 340Displacement (mm)
(b)
Figure 13: Curves for double CRLD bolts acting in parallel under impact load with intensity 800KN and duration 2ms: (a) displacement-timecurve and Load-time curve; and (b) load-displacement curve.
6. Conclusion
Under the impact loads with different intensities, the situa-tions of force and motion for the double CRLD bolts actingin parallel have great difference, which results in the differentmechanical responses. (i) Under relatively small loading, theCRLD bolts deform elastically and the deformation finallyreturns to zero. (ii) Under the high impact load, including thestable impact load and unstable impact load, the CRLDbolts undergo structural deformation after the initial elasticdeformation. The deformation of the CRLD bolts eventuallystabilizes at a certain amount caused by the relative sliding ofthe sleeves and shanks. The essential difference between thestable impact load and unstable impact load is that, under thestable impact load, no structural deformation will occur afterthe impact load ends; under the unstable impact load, thestructural deformation will still occur after the impact loadends.
In addition, under the three different impact loads, thetime of the displacement reaching its peak significantly lagsbehind the time of the load achieving its maximum. Underthe elastic impact load and stable impact load, there is acontraction of displacement before the end of the load.However, under the unstable impact load, the displacementcontinues to increase during the entire loading process.
Based on the above discussion about the mechanicalresponse properties of theCRLDbolts under the impact loadswith different intensities, some guidance can be provided forthe safe and stable support of the roadway with differentburied depth and lithology.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
Theresearch work is supported by the Special Funds from theNationalNatural Science Foundation of China [grant number
51574248]; the National Key Research and DevelopmentProgram [grant number 2016YFC0600901]; and the OpenFoundation of the State Key Laboratory for Geomechanicsand Deep Underground Engineering, Beijing [grant numberSKLGDUEK1728].
References
[1] W. D. Ortlepp and T. R. Stacey, βPerformance of tunnel supportunder large deformation static and dynamic loading,β Tun-nelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15β21, 1998.
[2] PK. Kaiser, M. Diederichs, and S. Yazici, βCable bolt perfor-mance during mining induced stress change-three case exam-ple,β in Proceedings of the international symposium on rocksupport, pp. 331β384, Sudbury, Canada, 1992.
[3] C. Windsor and A. Thompson, βReinforcement systems me-chanics, design, installation, testing, monitoring & modelling,βInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,vol. 35, no. 4-5, p. 453, 1998.
[4] M. Cai, βPrinciples of rock support in burst-prone ground,βTunnelling andUnderground Space Technology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp.46β56, 2013.
[5] M. He, C. Li, W. Gong, J.Wang, and Z. Tao, βSupport principlesof NPR bolts/cables and control techniques of large deforma-tion,βYanshilixueYuGongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of RockMechanics and Engineering, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1513β1529, 2016.
[6] C. C. Li, βA new energy-absorbing bolt for rock support in highstress rockmasses,β International Journal of RockMechanics andMining Sciences, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 396β404, 2010.
[7] R. Varden, R. Lachenicht, A. G. P. Thompson Jr, and E.Villaescusa, βDevelopment and implementation of the GarfordDynamic bolt at the Kanowna Belle mine,β in Proceedings of the10th Underground operators conference, pp. 95β104, Launceston,AsuIMM,Melborune, Australia, 2008.
[8] F. Charette andM. Plouffe, βA new rock bolt concept for under-ground excavations under high stress conditions,β in Proceed-ings of the Sixth international symposium on ground support inmining and civil engineering construction, pp. 225-40, SAIMM,Johannesburg, South Africa, 2008.
[9] A. Ansell, βDynamic testing of steel for a new type of energyabsorbing rock bolt,β Journal of Constructional Steel Research,vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 501β512, 2006.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 17
[10] A. F. Jager, βTwo new support units for the control of rockburstdamage,β International Journal of Rock Mechanics and MiningSciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 31, no. 2, p. A97, 1994.
[11] L. St-Pierre, F. P. Hassani, P. H. Radziszewski, and J. Ouellet,βDevelopment of a dynamic model for a cone bolt,β Interna-tional Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 46,no. 1, pp. 107β114, 2009.
[12] M. H. Turner and J. R. Player, βSeismicity at big bell mine,βin Proceedings of the Proceedings Massmin, pp. 791β797, Mel-bourne, Australia, 2000.
[13] D. Gaudreau, A. Gendron, and J. P. Basque, Apparatus andMethod for A Yieldable Tendon Mine Support US Patent, vol. 6,2002.
[14] B. Simser, W. C. Joughin, andW. D. Ortlepp, βThe performanceof Brunswick mines rockburst support system during a severeseismic episode,β Journal of the Southern African Institute ofMining and Metallurgy (JSAIMM), pp. 217β233, 2002.
[15] M. C. He, βConstant-resistance and large-deformation bolt,βChinese patent, 2011, Patent 2011: No. ZL 2010 1 0196197.2,Certificate No. 852069.
[16] M. C. He, W. L. Gong, J. Wang et al., βDevelopment of a novelenergy-absorbing bolt with extraordinarily large elongation andconstant resistance,β International Journal of Rock Mechanics &Mining Sciences, vol. 67, pp. 29β42, 2014.
[17] M.-C. He, J. Wang, X.-M. Sun, and X.-J. Yang, βMechanicscharacteristics and applications of prevention and control rockbursts of the negative poissonβs ratio effect anchor,β Journal ofCoal Science & Engineering (China), vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 214β221,2014.
[18] M. He, C. Li, and W. Gong, βElongation and impacting experi-mental system for boltswith constant resistance and large defor-mation and finite element analysis,β Yanshilixue Yu GongchengXuebao/Chinese Journal of RockMechanics and Engineering, vol.34, no. 11, pp. 2179β2187, 2015.
[19] L. Chen,H.Manchao, andG.Weili, βAnalysis on kinetic featuresof constant resistance high deformed bolt under differentimpact velocity,β Coal Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp.53β58, 2015.
[20] C. Li, M.-C. He, andW.-L. Gong, βAnalysis on impact dynamicsof negative Poissonβs ratio effect of anchor bolt with constantresistance and large deformation,βMeitan Xuebao/Journal of theChina Coal Society, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1393β1399, 2016.
[21] M. C. He, C. Li, W. L. Gong, L. R. Sousa, and S. L. Li, βDynamictests for a Constant-Resistance-Large-Deformation bolt usinga modified SHTB system,β Tunnelling and Underground SpaceTechnology, vol. 64, pp. 103β116, 2017.
[22] M. He and Z. Guo, βMechanical property and engineeringapplication of anchor bolt with constant resistance and largedeformation,β Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Jour-nal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1297β1308, 2014.
[23] X.-J. Yang, J.-W. Pang, B.-T. Zhang et al., βDeformation andfailure mechanism and support measures of the soft rockroadway in the air return laneway,β Meitan Xuebao/Journal ofthe China Coal Society, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1000β1008, 2014.
[24] M. C. He, Z. G. Tao, and W. L. Gong, βGeo-disaster predictionwith double-block mechanics based on Newton force measure-ment,β Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 107β119, 2017.
[25] Z.-G. Tao, H.-P. Li, G.-L. Sun, L.-J. Yin, and X.-L. Zhang,βDevelopment of monitoring and early warning system for
landslides based on constant resistance and large deformationanchor cable and its application,β Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol.36, no. 10, pp. 3032β3040, 2015.
[26] J. S. Rinehart, Stress Transients in Solids, Santa Fe, NewMexico,Mexico, 1975.
[27] W. K. Nowacki, Stress waves in non-elastic solids, PergamonPress, Oxford-New York-Toronto, Ont., 1978.
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Probability and StatisticsHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Journal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Engineering Mathematics
International Journal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Function SpacesAbstract and Applied AnalysisHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013Hindawiwww.hindawi.com
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2018
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018Volume 2018
Numerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisAdvances inAdvances in Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and SocietyHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com
DiοΏ½erential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2018
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
AnalysisInternational Journal of
Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Submit your manuscripts atwww.hindawi.com