e ngineering d esign l ab ii engr-102 w inter 2015 w eek 4 l ecture – b ridge m odule pramod...
TRANSCRIPT
1
ENGINEERING DESIGN LAB IIENGR-102 WINTER 2015WEEK 4 LECTURE – BRIDGE MODULE
Pramod Abichandani, Ph.D.
Richard Primerano, Ph.D.
LAB WEEK 4 – CAD AND SIMULATION TOOLSUSING DATA FROM SOFTWARE TOOLS
2
TEAMWORK EVALUATIONS
Due this week This is meant mainly to help us identify
potential teamwork issues and is not the only factor in deriving teamwork scores
If you are having any issues with team members, please let us know ASAP (don’t wait for evaluations).
3
DUE NEXT WEEK
Design Proposal See proposal template
Signoff sheets Lab notebook pages from weeks 1-4
See journal guidelines
4
BRIDGE DESIGN MODULE WEEK 4ITERATIVE K’NEX TRUSS BRIDGE DESIGN
Often, engineers rely on a combination of (pen and paper) calculation, simulation, and testing to arrive at final designs.
In this lab, we will simulate then build and test several K’NEX structures to compare simulation and experimental results.
5
BRIDGE DESIGN WORKFLOW
CAD Design
Simulation
Build and Test
6
INTERPRETING SOFTWARE TOOL OUTPUT
Software tools often handle the computations that would be tedious (or impossible) for us to do by hand.
They should never be relied upon without understanding the underlying theory or without qualitatively understanding the results. It is easy to set up a simulation problem
incorrectly Simulation models always contain a certain
amount of uncertainty Simulation tools never capture everything
Approximations are made to simplify analysis
7
INTERPRETING SOFTWARE TOOL OUTPUT Within Visual Analysis you must specify the
constraints and applied load It will calculate the relevant equations and
determine the tension/compression in each member Blue = tension, Red = compression
8
SCALING OF FORCES WITHIN A STRUCTURE
Under the assumption that the structure is operating in its linear elastic range, changes in applied load lead to proportional changes in internal and reaction forces.
100 lb
28.9 lb (t)
57.7 lb (c)57.7 lb (c)
50 lb50 lb
200 lb
57.8 lb (t)
115 lb (c)115 lb (c)
100 lb100 lb
9
DETERMINE WHERE THE BRIDGE WILL FAIL
Different joint types fail at different loads Joints are stronger in compression than
tension
weak in tension
strongerin tension
strongestin tension
10
LOAD AMPLIFICATION
Be aware that certain geometries can lead to amplification of internal loads
100 lb
28.9 lb (t)
57.7 lb (c)
50 lb50 lb
60˚
100 lb
86.6 lb
100 lb
50 lb50 lb
30˚
100 lb
186 lb
193 lb
50 lb50 lb
15˚
11
ORIENTATION OF CROSS BRACING
The orientation of cross bracing will effect whether it is in tension or compression.
k’NEX joints are generally stronger in compression
tension
Applied load
com
pres
sion
Applied load
12
DETERMINING WHEN THE BRIDGE WILL FAIL
If we assume the bridge is linear elastic, it is simple to determine approximately when it will fail.
The analysis is complicated by the fact that different joint types fail at different strengths
13
DETERMINING WHEN THE BRIDGE WILL FAIL
The bridge does not necessarily fail at its weakest joint. e.g. a very weak joint that has zero
tension/compression The bridge does not necessarily fail at in the
member with the largest scaling factor e.g. the member’s joints could be much stronger
than all other joints
14
DESIGN PROPOSAL
Should contain the following Summary of the design constraints under which
you must design your bridge Detailed description of your intended bridge
design Truss type, experimental and simulation results
Include any sketches, pictures, calculations relevant to your design
15
DUE NEXT WEEK!
Preliminary Design Proposal
First notebook check You should have a minimum of 15 pages by the
end of the quarter Document all experimental data, mechanism
sketches, pseudo code, etc…