e valuation p erspectives : l ogic m odels, i mpacts and b udgeting 2011 s ystems s cience g...

27
EVALUATION PERSPECTIVES: LOGIC MODELS, IMPACTS AND BUDGETING 2011 SYSTEMS SCIENCE GRANTSMANSHIP WORKSHOP USDA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE AUGUST 9, 2011 Dr. Gary J. Skolits Tiffany L. Smith Institute for Assessment and Evaluation 865-974-2777 [email protected]

Upload: conrad-todd

Post on 26-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

EVALUATION PERSPECTIVES:LOGIC MODELS, IMPACTS AND

BUDGETING

2 0 1 1 S Y S T E M S S C I E N C EG R A N T S M A N S H I P W O R K S H O P

U S D A N AT I O N A L I N S T I T U T E O F F O O DA N D A G R I C U LT U R E

AU G U S T 9 , 2 0 1 1Dr. Gary J. SkolitsTiffany L. Smith

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation

865-974-2777

[email protected]

Page 2: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 2

Evaluation Presentation Topics

1. Logic model basics

2. Documenting project impacts

3. Evaluation do’s and don’ts

4. Evaluation budgeting perspectives

Page 3: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 3

1. Logic Model Basics

Page 4: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 4

1. Logic Model Basics

A logic model is a visual depiction of

how a project intervention is

expected to produce a desired

outcome

Page 5: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 5

General Logic of a Project

Social Need (Problem)

Project Intervention (Action)

Results (Change)

Page 6: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 6

Logic Model Drivers

Needs Project Interventions Results

Needs Purpose Inputs

Outputs Outcomes

Page 7: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 7

Logic Model Elements

A. Needs

B. Purpose

C. Inputs

D. Outputs

E. Outcomes

Page 8: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 8

A. Needs

What problems deserve attention?

oAlways competing needsoSelect critical need to addressoDefine the need

Page 9: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 9

B. Purpose

What do you seek to accomplish towards addressing this problem?

oSelect aspects of the problem to addressoDefine the specific purpose of your project

Page 10: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 10

C. Inputs

What resources will you invest?

oMoney

oPeople

oMaterials

oEquipment

oPartners

Page 11: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 11

D. Outputs

What will you do?

oServices

oTraining

oProducts

Whom will you reach?

oClients (must define this group)

oTypically multiple stakeholders

Page 12: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 12

E. Outcomes

What results will you achieve?

Short-term (initial impact on participants)

Medium-term (ongoing impact on participants)

Long-term (impact on the problem)

Page 13: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 13

2. Documenting Project Impacts

Page 14: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 14

Outcomes – Short-Term

Feedback

Awareness

Commitment

Page 15: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 15

Outcomes – Medium-Term

Knowledge/Skills

Disposition

Behavior

Page 16: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 16

Outcomes - Long-Term

Achievement of project purpose

Favorable change in the initial need of concern

Page 17: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 17

Impact: A Theory of Change

Short -term: If participant reaction is positive, then you theorize that participants are likely to learn desired knowledge, skills, and attitudes.

Medium-term: If participant learning/growth occurs (i.e., knowledge, skills, and dispositions), then you theorize that participants will change their behavior.

Long-term: If behavior changes, then you theorize that there will be a positive change in terms of the initial need.

Page 18: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 18

Logic Model Template University of Wisconsin-Madison Extension

Page 19: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 19

EVALUATION: check and verify

What do you want to know?

How will you know it?

PLANNING: start with the end in mind

Page 20: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 20

3. Evaluation Do’s and Don’ts

Page 21: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 21

A Few Evaluation Do’s

Talk with colleagues sponsoring similar projects for leads on good evaluators

Engage an evaluator with a good reputation and experience with your type of evaluation need

Engage an evaluator early in project planning

Understand the role of formative and summative project evaluation

Recognize the importance of efficient, reliable data collection

Build evaluation data collection into project operations (when possible)

Page 22: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 22

A Few Evaluation Dont’s

Be intimidated by evaluation – it is meant to enhance your project

Fail to communicate with your evaluator on a regularly scheduled basis

Forget to address IRB concerns – protect yourself and your clients/stakeholders

Miss the opportunity to use project and evaluation data to add to the literature in your field

Page 23: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 23

4 . Evaluation Budgeting Perspectives

Page 24: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 24

4. Budgeting for Evaluation

Some factors to consider

Evaluation costs depend on the required effort of the evaluator

A general rule: 5% to 8% of project budget

Be prepared to negotiate with your evaluator to minimize evaluation costs

Page 25: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 25

Budgeting for Evaluation

The more data project staff collect, the lower the evaluation costs. (However, some data should be collected by the evaluator.)

Link any proposed evaluation budget to specific evaluation plan and tasks.

Stay on top of the deliverables promised by your evaluator.

Page 26: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 26

Two Key Resources

University of Wisconsin-Madison (Extension)http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html

Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Guide http://www.wkkf.org/knowledge-center/resources/2006/02/WK-Kellogg-Foundation-Logic-Model-Development-Guide.aspx

Page 27: E VALUATION P ERSPECTIVES : L OGIC M ODELS, I MPACTS AND B UDGETING 2011 S YSTEMS S CIENCE G RANTSMANSHIP W ORKSHOP USDA N ATIONAL I NSTITUTE OF F OOD

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 27

Gary Skolits [email protected]

865-974-2777

Institute for Assessment and EvaluationUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville

1122 Volunteer Boulevard; A503 Bailey Education ComplexKnoxville, TN 37996

http://web.utk.edu/~iae/