early intervention, the family nurse partnership programme, and father involvement
DESCRIPTION
Early intervention, the Family Nurse Partnership programme, and father involvement. Professor Jacqueline Barnes Birkbeck, University of London. What will be covered. Why early intervention/prevention Some examples Brief description of FNP FNP engaging with fathers. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Early intervention, the Family Nurse Partnership programme, and father involvement
Professor Jacqueline BarnesBirkbeck, University of London
2
What will be covered
Why early intervention/prevention Some examples Brief description of FNP FNP engaging with fathers
3
Wealth of data from life course studies linking adversity in early life to:
o poor literacy
o anti-social and criminal behaviour
o substance abuse
o poor mental and physical health
o adult mortality
Risk factors and poor outcomes
4
Need to intervene
Have been reductions in child poverty, unemployment and crime, but there are still families caught in a cycle of disadvantage and exclusion.
To divert trajectories related to disadvantage there is a need for: Earlier and better identification of at risk families Earlier and more effective intervention and
prevention
5
Emerging knowledge on neurological development
Brain development depends on both genes and experiences
Rapid brain development takes place in the first year of life
Early interactions directly affect the way the brain is wired
Early relationships set the thermostat for later control of stress response
(Shore R, Rethinking the Brain, 1997)
6
Experience affects Brain Development
o Conditions in early life affect the differentiation and function of billions of neurons and trillions of synapses in the brain
o Early experience sets up neurological and biological pathways in the brain that affect well being throughout life affecting health, learning and behaviour
o The more positive stimuli a baby is given, the more brain cells and synapses it will be able to develop.
7
But - Brain vulnerability
The disadvantage of the human brain’s plasticity is that it renders it vulnerable to trauma.
The brain of an abused or neglected child is significantly smaller than the norm.
The limbic system (which governs emotions) is 20-30 per cent smaller with fewer synapses.
The hippocampus (responsible for memory) is also smaller.
8
Differences in brain development following
severe sensory neglect
9
Prevent before problems emerge
If people keep falling off a cliff, don’t worry about where you put the ambulance at the bottom. Build a fence at the top and stop them falling off in the first place.
Source: Allen & Duncan-Smith, 2010
10
Small change early leads to large impact later
11
Rates of return to human capital investment (Heckman 2000)
0
Preschool School Post-school
Rate of return to investment in human capital
Preschool programs
Schooling
Job training
Age
12
Brain Development – Opportunity and Brain Development – Opportunity and Investment Investment
Spending on Health, Education, Income Support, Social Services and Crime
Brain Malleability
Conception
Pub
lic E
xpen
ditu
re
Inte
nsity
of B
rain
's D
evel
opm
ent
BirthAge
1 3 10 60 80
13
Early years interventions for disadvantaged populations
Examples, USA•Nurse Family Partnership – home-visiting – pregnancy to 2 years
•Abecedarian Project – childcare/preschool 0-6
•Early Head Start – childcare/ home visit 0-3
•Perry Preschool Project – preschool 3+years
14
Abecedarian Project (Ramey et al., 2000)Abecedarian Project (Ramey et al., 2000)
111 African-American disadvantaged children randomly assigned at age 3 months to:
• High quality centre-based provision
(day-care and preschool)
• Control group:
- Both groups followed into adulthood
15
Abecedarian Project (Ramey et al., 2000)Abecedarian Project (Ramey et al., 2000)
Results up to age 21 years
- Intervention group showed
• Higher cognitive development from 18 months upward
• Greater social competence in preschool
• Better school achievement
• More college attendance
• Delayed child bearing
• Better employment
• Less smoking and drug use
16
Early Head Start ------ 0-3year olds (Love et al, 2003, 2005)
3000 disadvantaged families studied from birth – randomly assigned: Home-based programme, Centre-based programme, Centre and home visits, Control group
At age 3 intervention improved Cognitive and Language Development, more sustained attention and reduced aggression
Improved parent-child interaction , Improved home environment (more reading – less spanking)• Centre and home > centre > > home-based• Better implementation overall better effects
17
UK, Sure Start Local Programmes
Most disadvantaged neighbourhoods From birth to fourth birthday All families living in the area so non-
targeted Locally driven agenda allowing for
diversity Enhancement of existing services
18
Some positive impacts
At 3 years children in Sure Start areas had better social development with: more positive social behaviour, more independence, better self regulation. They received more immunisations and fewer accidental injuries.
Parents showed less negative (harsh) parenting with more stimulating home environments.
More use of child and family services.
19
Pregnancy- A ‘magic moment’ of opportunity?
“Like it or not, the most important mental and behavioural patterns, once established, are difficult to change once children enter school”
Nobel Laureate James Heckman (2005)
• Pregnancy and the first 3 years are vital to child development, life chances and future achievement
• Pregnancy and birth of a child is a ‘magic moment’ of opportunity when parents are uniquely receptive to support
• Universal midwifery and health visiting services are ideally placed to identify children and families at risk
• Embedding the principle of ‘progressive universalism’ into maternal services should be a priority to ensure that additional support is provided to those children and families at greatest risk
20
The potential of the Family Nurse Partnership programme
To transform the life chances of the most disadvantaged children and families
A new professional role for nurses Transformation of universal services in
pregnancy and the first years of life Impact on ‘community parenting’ Strengthen the health contribution to child and
family services
21
FNP approach
Builds on the strengths of existing universal health visiting and midwifery services
Builds on policy for children and families (Every Child Matters and the National Service Framework for maternity and children)
Multi-faceted risks need multi-faceted but integrated responses
22
FNP
Nurses visit first time parents from pregnancy until child age two
Solid clinical & theoretical underpinnings
Has been rigorously tested over 30 years of development and 3 large scale randomised trials
23
FNP GOALS
Connecting with families to:
1. Improve pregnancy outcomes
2. Improve child health and development and future school readiness and achievement
3. Improve parents’ economic self-sufficiency
24
Visiting Schedule
1/week first month Every other week through pregnancy 1/week first 6 weeks after delivery Every other week until 21 months Once a month until age 2
Each visit covers 5 domains and uses materials and activities to build self-efficacy, change behaviour, promote attachment
25
Programme domains
Personal health Environmental health Life Course Development Maternal role Family and Friends
26
THREE RANDOMISED TRIALS OF PROGRAMME
• Low-income whites
• Semi-rural
• Low-income blacks
• Urban
• Large portion of Hispanics
• Nurse versus paraprofessional visitors
Elmira, NY1977
N = 400
Memphis, TN1987
N = 1,138
Denver, CO1994
N = 735
27
Findings across at least two trials Improvements in women’s prenatal health
Reductions in children’s injuries
Fewer subsequent pregnancies Greater intervals between births
Increases in fathers’ involvement
Increases in employment Reductions in welfare and food stamps
Improvements in school readiness
28
Cumulative Cost Savings: Elmira High-Risk Families
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
0 2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Cumulative dollars
perchild
Age of child (years)
Cumulative Costs
Cumulative savings
SOCIAL
RETURN
29
FNP at the heart of current government policy
Health Inequalities – progress and next steps
The Children’s Plan Healthy Child Programme Think Family Excellence and Fairness: achieving world
class services Youth Crime Action Plan Child Health Strategy
30
Testing the NFP in England 10 PCT/LA sites Somerset, Manchester, Slough, Tower
Hamlets, Derby City, Walsall, Southwark, County Durham/Darlington, SE Essex, Barnsley
Teams drawn from health visiting and midwifery
100-150 clients per site Approximately half have reached 2
years
31
Aims of the implementation research To examine the feasibility of implementing the
Nurse-Family Partnership model in England To determine the most effective method of
presenting the model to prospective clients To estimate the cost To illuminate the experience of practitioners,
the wider service community, and children and families
To determine short-term impacts on practitioners, the wider service community, children and families
32
FNP Identified vulnerable population
80% without 5 or more A*-C GCSEs 78% not employed 67% not living with partner 75% below poverty line 24% report physical abuse in past 12 months,
11% during pregnancy 50% BMI < or >recommended range
Indicates simple selection system, under 20 and first time mother will identify appropriate group cf. those in USA trials
33
Father involvement high
Young fathers show great interest in FNP, and many want to be present for visits or complete the activities
Pregnancy, 51% father present for at least one visit, on average 24% of all visits (2220/9270)
Infancy, 57% father present for at least one visit, on average 24% of all visits (2213/9236)
34
Fathers rated well in understanding, slightly lower in involvement
Mean understanding during visit Mothers 4.5, 4,.6 Fathers 4.1, 4.1
Mean involvement during visit Mothers 4.7, 4.7 Fathers 3.9, 3.8
35
Fathers do not expect to be involved
“I liked that she [FN] wasn’t just involving [client], she was involving me as well.”
“I did not expect to be involved I thought it would be more for my girlfriend’s benefit but when I turned up she said she would help me as well. I have learned about being a parent and that has helped a lot. I don’t mind doing the worksheets; I find them really useful.”
36
Proud to be a Dad?
FN was first one who asked this young father “Am I proud that I’m going to be a Dad, am I getting ready for everything” and he concluded his interview by saying
“I would say, ‘Come to the visits it is a good thing to do’.”
37
Strength based, not intrusive
“When I first heard about it I thought it would have been all about [client] being a teenage mother, not giving information but trying to check up, prying into our pregnancy, but it hasn’t been like that.”
38
Unsure at first, broad coverage attracts
“It’s been better than what I thought it might be. I wasn’t very sure at first….”
“I was a bit wary at the beginning, and when she went through one or two things I thought ‘well, its not for me really, its just for [client]’ but then after a couple of sessions I started to get a bit more involved. When she started saying stuff like about the finance and what the baby needs, how to look after the baby properly, I thought ‘right, I haven’t really got much of a clue so maybe I’ll stick it out.’”
39
Getting involved in the activities
[Father who has children from previous relationship] “Sometimes we all get carried away and we’re chatting for ages. [FN] gets loads of questionnaires each time. Like try to remember how you feel, or something like, she’ll give one to her [client] and one to me and see if we get the same sort of answers. Last time it was how many babies would you like to have.”
40
Learning, for both new and experienced fathers
“The Family Nurse brought a little baby to show us how the baby is actually born. I’ve never seen a birth before and it was quite interesting.”
“First off I thought ‘this is going to be boring’ and I did think I knew everything [had child already with another mother] but when she [FN] did come there is so much more that I have found out and so much more that I can still find out from her.”
41
Helping behaviour change for fathers
[Father with three teenage children from a previous relationship]
“The FN has updated me on certain information and refreshed me on others, and she is going to be helping me with stopping smoking”
thought he went on to say that he usually stayed in a separate room during the visits.
42
Keeping a bit distant is OK
“When she visits I am not always in the same room. Because I feel like if I am needed to be spoken to obviously my girlfriend will come and get me. Sometimes I am in there sometimes I am out of the way. [In the future] I’ll probably just go along with everything. Like when I go and leave my girlfriend and the nurse to it. If I am needed I will be there.”
43
FNP and parental relationship
“We used to do nothing but argue but we have both calmed down, we don’t argue because we know the baby can hear everything.” (mother)
“It’s like she cares about my situation [partner in prison]; she’s doing her job but she actually goes a step further.”
44
Conclusions
FNP initiated during pregnancy, to have maximum potential impact for mother, father and child
Received well by families Father involvement is good and
sustains beyond the pregnancy phase Potential to reduce inequality for
children born in disadvantaged circumstances, and enhance the life course of parents.