ecal review 5 th ild workshop @ lal orsay 23-25 may 2011 k. kawagoe kobe-u kyushu-u in april 2011
TRANSCRIPT
ECAL review5th ILD workshop @ LAL Orsay
23-25 May 2011K. Kawagoe
Kobe-U Kyushu-Uin April 2011
The ILD ECAL• Finely granular PFA calorimeter with tungsten absorber• Cell-size in baseline design ~ 5 x 5 mm2, num. of cells ~100M in total• Necessary to achieve less dead space, low production cost
Candidate technologies :• Silicon-tungsten• Scintillator-tungsten• MAPS/DECAL
Jet Energy Resolutionby M. Thomson
Barrel: 5 octogonal wheelsRmin = 1808 mm; Rmax = 2220 mmWidth = 940 mmEnd-caps: 4 quarters∅min = 800 mm
S. Uozumi@ILDWS2010
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 2
R&D studies of ILD ECAL are carried out inside CALICE Collaboration
For details of recent works, see slides at CALICE Collaboration Meeting last week at CERN.
Silicon tungsten ECAL status – progress towards DBD
“Physics prototype” 10k channel physics prototype
6 years of successful operation at DESY, CERN, FNAL
Validated principle and performance
Very few signs of agingCalibrations stable with timeNo problems with e.g. conductive glue dotsConnectors can get flaky with repeated re-connections
D. Jeans
Integration of ECAL into ILD-like detector
addressed within Technological Prototype development
Mechanical
~2/3 ILD barrel moduleunder construction
mould 1 alveolus
mould 3 alveoli
Core
2.5m long alveolae (endcap)
Fastening system
D. Jeans
Silicon sensors
Starting discussions directly with Hamamatsu engineers
investigate sensor improvements (laser cutting -> reduced edge areas)cost control
widen technical requirements(manufacturer chooses thickness...)
relax quality requirements(allow few dead pixels, higher leakage current...)
Batch of test sensors expected in a couple of months
D. Jeans
Front-end electronics
SKIROC2 ASIC produceddesigned for ECAL Si PIN diode readoutLow power, power-pulse capability
being tested
Front end PCB
Supports Si sensors and ASICs,Routes data to and from ASICs to outside world
Strict requirements on thicknessnow met by manufacturersSome improvements required
(planarity)
D. Jeans
Assembly of sensitive detectorsSensor -> PCB
gluing
ASIC -> PCBWire bonding
HV connectionKapton cables
Industrial techniquese.g. Anisotropic Conductive Films
Powering, cooling, DAQ
Compact, scalable systems under development
D. Jeans
Mokka ECAL simulation
Good level of realism
- dead area at sensor edge
- mechanical tolerance between sensors
- structural supports within modules
- support structure between ECAL and HCAL
- ECAL cables and cooling pipes
D. Jeans
SummarySilicon tungsten ECAL
Established designwell developed ideas about detector integration
No technical show-stoppers to current design- of course some challenges
As always, sensor cost is main concernstudies to better understand are continuing
in close contact with industry
D. Jeans
Scintillator-tungsten ECAL• Cost-effective scintillator strip calorimeter
aiming to have virtual cells by x-y strips crossing.
• Beam tests of the physics prototype have been performed to prove feasibility.– DESY 2007 (small prototype)– FNAL 2008, 2009 (test with AHCAL)
• ILD structure – Scintillator strips with 5 mm width 2 mm thick without WLS fiber– 3 mm tungsten, ~21 X0 in total
• Study of “strip-clustering” underway with realistic simulation• Remaining Hardware R&D issues :
– Study of 5 mm width scintillator-strip without WLS fiber– Dynamic range of photo-sensor– Establish design of the photo-sensor gain
calibration system
Scintillator strip (4.5 x 1 x 0.3 cm)
MPPCWLSfiber
18 c
m
18 cm
72 strips
x 30 layers
S. Uozumi@ILDWS2010
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 10
Strip-splitting method developed by Katsu has shown good performance.
Two scintillator layers are being constructed to be tested in the same mechanical structure as the SiECAL Technological prototype.
MPPC with more pixels (smaller pixel size) are being developed.
Strip-splitting method• An algorithm developed by
Katsu to split energy deposit in a strip to virtual square cells using information of adjacent orthogonal layers.
• After Mark’s tuning of PandraPFA for ScECAL, good jet energy resolution was achieved, although still a little worse than SiECAL.
• The origin of the difference between SiECAL and ScECAL to be further investigated.
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 11
w/o strip-splitting
with strip-splitting
SiECAL Mokka (5mmx5mm)
ILD with PandraPFAStrip width: 5mm
ScECAL to the technological prototypeIntegration of electronics
• Original idea for ILD– Two scintillator layers of orthogonal
directions in a drawer• The technological prototype
– The mechanical structure is designed for Si-pad layers: required thickness is different
– A few scintillator layers are being constructed, but only one layer in each drawer
– How to fix the strips in the structure ? Some ideas exist, to be further investigated.
• Test beam in 2012
electronics
stripscintillator
1211/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 12
Flexible Printed Cable• MPPC has to stand up on the EBU• need a thin flexible connection : FPC
FPC+MPPC
EBU withSPIROC(DESY)
Surface-mount MPPC FPC
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 13
R&D of 5mm width scintillator strips• Direct readout of 5mm width scintillator strips to realize an
effective cell size of 5mmx5mm• Number of P.E. is roughly 14, good enough.• Aiming at good uniformity with small dead region
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 14
scintillator strip scintillator strip
acrylic spacer 3mmMPPC 25m pitch (1600 pixels)
14
5mm strip • improve homogeneity around the MPPC
hole hole filled with grease
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 15
LED-like package for MPPC ?
MPPC evolution
• Smaller pixel size (more pixels/mm2)– for better dynamic range and linearity– trade off geometrical acceptance for
photons
• 1600 pixel/mm2 : 25m pitch– ~36%eff, ~14 p.e. for MIP
• 2500 pixel/mm2 : 20m pitch– ~25% g.e., ~10 p.e. for MIP ?
• 4400 pixel/mm2 : 15m pitch– 35% g.e., ~14% for MIP ?
16
25m pitch
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 16
20m pitch
15m pitch
MPPC bench test• compare response curves by a LED
PMT
MPPCLED(pulse width ~ 5ns)
PMT responseADC
MPPC res.(p.e.)
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 17
Possible Idea for baseline design of the ILD ECAL• A lot of discussion has been done to form the “Unified ILD ECAL” in this month.
• One possible idea is a “hybrid-type ECAL” with silicon pads and Scintillator-strips.
– The silicon pads in pre-shower and shower-max region– The scintillator layers cover after the shower maximum– Another idea : Si layers interleaved in scintillator layers– Cost-effective– No two-fold ambiguity for the strip clustering with silicon sensors– Can use established the silicon and Scintillator ECAL technologies.– Need extensive simulation study to determine configuration of Silicon / Scintillator layers– Specific cell & strip combined clustering must be developed.
• Mokka simulation of the hybrid-type ECAL is under preparation.
Two-fold ambiguitywith strip clustering
Si pads(5x5 mm2)
Scint strips(5-10 x 45 mm2)
S. Uozumi@ILDWS2010
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 18
Simulation studies are about to start for optimization.
Hybrid ECAL• ScECAL with strip-splitting method has shown good performance
(stochastic term < 30% at Z pole), close to the SiECAL performance.• There should be optimum combination of SiECAL and ScECAL for
ILD Hybrid ECAL with good performance and reasonable cost.
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 19
Sc/(Si+Sc)
Performance Cost
Low
high
high
low
Hybrid ECAL (cont’d)• Hardware R&D:
– ECAL technological prototype will have both Si-pad and scintillator-strip layers: good experience to operate two different technologies simultaneously in a same mechanical structure.
• Simulation studies for optimization– Hybrid ECAL geometry has been already implemented in Mokka.– Strip-splitting method to be implemented in MarlinReco soon.– Tamaki (Kyushu) and new Posdoc@LLR will work on this study.– Various combinations to be studied, for example:
• SiSiSi…SiSiSiScScSc…ScScSc• SiSiScScSiSiScSc…SiSiScScSiSiScSc• ScSc…ScScSiSi…SiSiScSc…ScSc
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 20
MAPS (DECAL) option• Potential large cost reductions
– Standard CMOS sensor– No proprietary processes– Electronics all on sensor, reduced
fabrication/assembly costs• Ultimate spatial resolution
– 50x50 μm2 pixels– “TERA Pixel” detector
• TPAC readout chip v1.0-v1.2 = 168 x 168 pixels; 79.4 mm2
Expected resolution (pixel counting) 13%/√E(GeV) 1%⊕• Status:
– successful CERN TB of 6 sensors summer 2009
– New SPiDeR collaboration – Physics prototype planned for 2012
• Critical points– integration, Power consumption,
services– Funding issue for further R&D
S. Uozumi@ILDWS2010
11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 21
Because of funding problems in UK, currently no plan for physics prototype DECAL. Apart from sensor R&D being continued, only simulation studies have been carried out recently.
DECAL Status Recent resolution studies using HZ/ZZ 4-jet events and qq pairs
ILCSoft v01-10, Mokka 07-06, QGSP_BERT. Use old ILD_00 model, direct comparison of
DECAL and SiW (trivially adapted SECal03 driver for DECAL). MarlinReco v00-19, IldCaloDigi, PandoraPFANew v00-04.
Jet energy resolution extracted with full PFA, 2 very different environments ZZ/HZ case: bin hadronic jets according to their energy, (all at s = 500
GeV) pairs, 10 energies, s = 50-500 GeV
Energy resolutions obtained in our studies (4-jet topology) DECAL (25.5±0.6)%/√E
(analogue) SiW (22.3±0.5)%/√E
pairs, DECAL (4.9±0.2)%/√E
(analogue) SiW (4.8±0.2)%/√E
DECAL performance comparable with baseline ECAL options
More straightforward qq (uds) jet resolution, no ISR, etc. to be done 11/05/23ECAL review K. Kawagoe
Reco’d PFOs
Sim
N. Watson
SummaryECAL group is working toward DBD with a strong international collaboration.•SiECAL
– Physics prototype: successful operation of 6 years at TB – Technological prototype being constructed
• to establish necessary technology for ILD: sensors, ASIC, PCB, Integration, DAQ, Mechanical structure, and cooling.
• First (small) test will start in this year.•ScECAL
– A few layers to be integrated into the technological prototype– Progress in Strip-clustering, 5mm strips, new MPPC.
•Hybrid ECAL (SiECAL+ScECAL)– is considered seriously, and intensive studies are starting for
optimization.•MAPS DECAL, currently having financial problems for its R&D, may be considered as an option beyond DBD. 11/05/23 ECAL review K. Kawagoe 23