ecogi pre- f biom ass for anaerobic - danetv - the danish ... · f biom and separ or biogas 2013...

ECOPre-dige Mechaindust

Testr J.no.

VersionRevise

OGI -treatmestion anical pretry to obta

report

1004

n 1, Feb 12d version 5

ment o

treatment in a pulp f

2th 2013 5, may 6th

of biom

and separfor biogas

2013

mass f

ration of osification

for ana

organic wa

aerobi

aste from

ic

househollds and

Table Intr1.

1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4.

Tes2. 1.5.

1.51.51.5 1.6.

1.61.61.61.61.61.61.61.61.6

Tes3. 1.7. 1.8. 1.9. 1.10.

Ref4.AppeAppeAppe

of conteroduction ...

Name andName of tReferenceDeviation

st design ....Test site ..

.1. Type

.2. Addr

.3. DescrTests .......

6.1. Test m6.2. Test s6.3. Test s6.4. Test e6.5. Type6.6. Oper6.7. Oper6.8. Techn6.9. Healtst results ....

Test data Test PerfoTest quali

Ammenferences .....

endix 1 Tendix 2 Tendix 3

ents ..................

d contact of test centre/te to test planns to test pla....................................

es of test siteresses .........riptions ........................methods ....staff ...........schedule ....equipment .

e and numbeation conditation measunology maith, safety an..................summary ...

ormance obity assurancndments to ..................

Terms and dTest data repAmendmen

..................f proposer ...test responsin and specifan ...................................................es .............................................................................................................................................

er of sampletions ..........urements ....ntenance ....

nd wastes .......................................servation ...

ce summaryand deviatio..................

definitions .port ...........

nt and devia

...................

...................ible ............fic verificat.................................................................................................................................................................................................................es ....................................................................................................................................................

y incl. audit ons from te.........................................................ations repor

...................

...................

...................tion protoco.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................results .......st plan .................................................................t for test .....

...................

...................

...................ol ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

2

................ 3

................ 3

................ 3

................ 3

................ 3

................ 3

................ 4

................ 4

................ 4

................ 5

................ 5

................ 5

................ 7

................ 7

................ 7

................ 7

................ 8

................ 8

................ 8

................ 8

................ 9

................ 9

.............. 10

.............. 10

.............. 10

.............. 10

.............. 10

.............. 13

.............. 34

2

4 4 4

7 7 7 7

9 9 0 0 0 0 0

4

Intr1.This tesenvironguidelin

Na1.1. Propose KomtekContact

Na1.2.Danish DK-800Test resbmh@teInternallbfh@te

Re1.3.The testThe ver

De1.4. There wdescribe

Tes2.The testwaste in

• R• P• E• W

1 Organicapprox. 2mm are n

roductiost report is thnmental technes in EU ge

me and co

er

k Miljø af 20t: Bjarne La

ame of tesTechnologi

00, Aarhus, sponsible: Beknologisk.l reviewer: Leknologisk.d

ference tot plan is titlerification pr

viations towere minor ed in part 1.

st designt design is bn order to ev

Recovery oPurity of orEnergy conWater cons

c matter is def25-30 days of not included as

on he result of

hnology folleneral verif

ontact of p

012 A/S, Drarsen, phone

st centre/teical InstituteDenmark.

Bjørn Malmg.dk. Lotte Bjerrudk

o test planed: Ecogi, Totocol is tit

o test plandeviations .10.

n based on 3 rvaluate the

of organic mrganic mattensumption pumption pe

fined as materimesophilic ops they are not

f a test carrielowing the Efication prot

proposer

rivervej 8, De: +45 7020

est respone, Verificati

gren-Hanse

um Friis-Ho

n and specTestplan J.nled: Ecogi,

n of the meth

repeated tescustomer cl

matter for bioer for biogaer ton waste

er ton waste

ial which can peration and 1considered di

ed out for vETV methotocol versio

DK 6670 H0 54 89, e-m

nsible ion Centre,

en (BMH), p

olm (LBFH)

cific verifino.1004

Verification

hod in the te

t runs of thelaims conce

ogas producas productioe

be converted 18-21 days of igestible withi

verification ood. The formon 1.0 Decem

Holsted mail: Bjarne@

Life Scienc

phone: +45

), phone: +4

cation pro

n Protocol J

est plan for t

e ECOGI foerning the fo

ction1 in pun in pulp

into biogas wthermophilic in a normal op

of the perfomat used formber 15th 20

@komtek.d

ce Division,

72201810,

45 7220183

otocol

J.no.1004

the sorting p

or each of twollowing iss

lp

within a normaoperation . Wperation perio

ormance of r reporting f011.

dk

, Kongsvang

e-mail:

37, e-mail:

procedure a

wo differentsues:

al period of opWood pieces ofod in a biogas

3

an follows

g Allé 29,

as

t kinds of

peration f size >5*5*5 plant.

3

The two

1. O2. F

Every teone test

Figure 1 CalculaPurity oRecoveRecover

Tes1.5.The test

1.5.1. The siteusing th

1.5.2. Test sit

o types of wOrganic fracFood waste f

est run const run sample

: test runs an

ation of purof biopulp isry of biopury of biopul

st site t site is Kom

Types of tee is a plant phe develope

Addresseste

waste are: ction from hfrom superm

sists of 3 bae (Figure 1)

nd sampling f

rity: s calculatedulp: lp is calcula

mtek A/S, D

est sites performing d ECOGI p

s

household wmarket 25 %

atch runs. Th. Three tons

for the two wa

d as given in

ated as given

Drivervej 8,

compostingrocess.

waste Vejle %, 25% dair

he samples s waste is p

aste types

n appendix 3

n in append

DK 6670 H

g operation

Kommune ry waste and

taken underrocessed pe

3

dix 3.

Holsted

with a sepa

(waste sortid 50% of (1

r the 3 batcher batch.

arate treatme

ing system)1)

hes are com

ent of organ

4

.

mbined to

nic waste

4

Komtek

1.5.3. The ECbuildingseparate

Tes1.6.

1.6.1. Measurethe ECOtaken fr

Figure 2 • M1

• M2

• M3

• M4

Fee

Pure

Waste

M1

k Miljø af 20

DescriptioCOGI plant ig including ely from oth

sts

Test metho

ement of reOGI shown rom some of

Mass flows i

weight

weight (usi

weight (usi

weight will

eder

water

e

M2

012 A/S, Dr

ns is placed in necessary v

her facilities

ods

ecovery and in Figure 2f the mass f

in test

ing FT1 - flo

ing FT1 - flo

l decrease d

Pulper

FT1

2 for filling

rivervej 8, D

a separate cventilation is at Komtek

purity is ba and analys

flows.

ow transmit

ow transmit

during transp

Rejseparwas

M3 for

DK 6670 H

closed buildis run by elek.

ased on measis of a num

tter)

tter)

port for dra

ect-rator/hing

Collecti

r washing

FT

Holsted

ding at Komectrical pow

asuring all mmber of param

ainage

ion of washi

M4

V

T2

mtek. All equwer which ca

mass flows meters of re

Storage-tank

ing water M

Dewatering

quipment in an be logge

during operepresentativ

Soli

Pulp f

7

g

M5

M6

5

the ed

ration of ve samples

d fraction

for biogas

5

• M5 sam

• M6 cont

• M7 samrese

The elecis operahall. Basicallsection Biopulp This tessample sieve. T Organi This tesbeing w Automafollowinsubsampmatter. Organifrom coThis tesbalancebecausestep and The TS The test

weight wimpled repres

weight, retent in biopu

volume (bymples will beervoir after e

ctricity conating in, bef

ly three test0 for detaile

p purity tes

st determineby sieving t

The inorgani

ic content t

st determinewashed of th

atic washingng filtrationples will be

ic content inollection tast determine reasons on

e the washind thus the co

(Total Soli

t methods a

ll be recorentatively f

epresentativulp.

y height meae taken aftereach test run

sumption isfore and afte

ts are perfored descripti

st (samplin

es the puritythe biopulpic residue is

est in solid

es the loss ohe solid frac

g in a specian in order toe dried, man

n washing nk)

es the organnly and will ng water is rontent of or

ds) and VS

are described

rded after dfor organic c

e sampling

asurement ir each test rn.

s measured ber every test

rmed on theion of the te

g position V

y of the biop, flushing ws dried and w

fraction (s

of organic mtion in the E

ally designe determine

nually sorted

water (sam

nic residue innot be inclurecycled to rganic matte

(Volatile S

d in detail in

drainage, 60content test

g of each b

in tank) beforun while pu

by reading t run. The E

e samples taests and sam

V)

pulp by sortwith warm wweighed.

sampling p

matter in theECOGI pro

ed washer isrest organicd for organi

mpling posit

n the washiuded as lossthe pulper i

er is not lost

Solids) is an

n appendix

0 liter of tt

batch while

fore and afteumping the

the electriciECOGI is th

aken out durmpling:

ting the inorwater and ha

osition M 5

ECOGI process.

s performedc matter in tic/inorganic

tion V duri

ing water. Ts of organicin normal opt.

nalysed from

3 of the tes

the solid fr

e pumping

er a test run.washing wa

ity-meter ofhe only oper

ring test for

rganic residand sorting

5)

ocess, whic

d repeatedlythe solid frac matters an

ing recircu

This test is pmaterial in

peration for

m representa

t plan.

raction per

for test of

. Representater out of t

f the hall, thrating mach

r one waste

dues out of tof organic r

ch is the biop

y on the soliaction. The nd analysed

ulation of co

performed fon our calcular reuse in ne

ative sample

6

test run is

f anorganic

ative the

he ECOGI hine in this

type, see

the biopulp rests on the

pulp not

d fraction

for dry

ontent

or mass ations, ext pulping

es.

6

s

c

1.6.2. The testBjørn MSabine L

1.6.3. Task

Applicati

Verificati

Test

Analysis

Test repo

Verificati

Verificati

1.6.4. The testdifferensmall shplant. F

1.6.5. The typ sample

biosolid

Collec

In generwas use SamplinThe maiis stuckbucket i PreparaIn all sumaterial

Test staff t staff is

Malmgren-HLindholst (S

Test sched

ion definition

ion protocol w

phase

orting

ion

ion report

Test equipt equipment

nt mesh sizehovels, dryior further d

Type and npes and num

opulp fraction

ction tank

ral the folloed.

ng of mainin samples

k in the valvis used for s

ation of sububdividing ol may float

Hansen (BMSBL)

dule

document

with test plan

pment t includes bes, small whng ovens, c

details see A

number of mber of samp

Sampposit

VMV

owing practi

n sample froare taken frve. Before sampling th

bsamples of samples or sink.

MH) SS

Timing

August 201

November 2

December 2

December 2

January 201

January 201

April 2013

esides the Eheel loader, oncrete mix

Appendix 3 i

samples ples per typ

pling tion

V M5 V

ise for samp

om inlet anrom valves wobtaining te main sam

care was ta

Sampling, dSampling, a

12

2012

2012

2012-january 2

13

13

ECOGI sampitch-fork,

xer with attain the test p

pe of waste a

Numbebatch sam

9

pling, subsa

nd outlet with sufficithe sample

mples. For de

aken to prod

data analysisanalyses, da

2013

mpling contasorting tablached 40 m

plan.

are summar

r of mples

N

ampling and

ient dimensiat least 2 letails see Ap

duce represe

s and reportta analysis,

ainers, buckle with drainm sieve, we

rized in the

Number of samples

3 3

d sample han

ion (1”) to eitres are disppendix 3 in

entative sub

ting (TI) reporting (

kets, sieves wn for water eights, flow

following.

test s

Nusamw

ndling of su

ensure that scarded. A in Test plan

bsamples as

7

TI)

with collection,

wmeters in

umber of mples per aste type

3 3 3

uspensions

no material10-15 litre

.

some fibre

7

l e

e

Dependfollowin

1) Ht

2) Ip

Used MIn the temethod All othe HandlinAll fibrlater ana

Used prSolid frthere be

1.6.6. Before efrom theand outp

1.6.7. • T• W

1.6.8. The testin the te

1.6.9. While teof splascontaineperform

ding on typeng way: Homogenioto subsampInhomogenperformed f

Methods ests the biopwas also us

er sampled m

ng of sampre material walysis.

reservation action samp

efore VS an

Operation

each test rue previous oput waste w

Operation Total powerWater consu

Technologt is a short test.

Health, saf

esting, the pshes and if ner. Based on

med without

e of the hom

ous pulps: ale

nious pulpsfollowed by

pulp was vesed for wash

material wa

ples was refriger

and storagples were tralysis.

conditions

n of waste, operation co

was emptied

measuremr consumptioumption dur

gy maintenterm perform

fety and wa

personal wenecessary brn low tempebreathing p

mogeneity o

a subsample

s with floatiy proportion

ery homogenhing water i

as solid.

rated if test

ge of sampleansported to

s

the whole sould be obse

d. Each batch

ments on during trring treatme

ance mance test o

astes

ears a protecreathing proeratures durprotection.

of the bioma

e was made

ing layers onal weigh of

nious and cin the sortin

ts were perf

es: o Danish Te

system waserved any loh test uses 3

reatment waent was reco

of 2-3 days.

ctive suit anotection. Thring test (0-

ass pulp the

e by stirring

or fast sinkf solid and l

ould be subng step.

formed with

echnologica

flushed witonger. Furth30 minutes

as recordedorded

. Maintenan

nd gloves, sahe waste can5ºC) it was

e subsample

main samp

king layers: liquid fracti

bsampled us

hin 2-3 day

al Institute d

th clean wather all convpulping.

nce requirem

afety glassen be deposit

decided tha

es were obta

ple well dur

Sieving ofions into sub

sing method

ys or freeze

directly and

ter until no veyers for so

ments are no

es in case thted in a genat sorting co

8

ained in the

ing transfer

f fibres wasbsamples.

d 1). This

ed down for

d dried

visible rest olid input

ot covered

here is risk eral waste ould be

8

e

r

s

r

Tes3.The testDANET

Tes1.7.Target a For the A: OrgaB: Food Parame OveralCapacityChemicPure Wa

Energy Electrici

TreatmPurity oparticles2-6 mm)15% Recover

st resultst report willTV Centre Q

st data suand measure

following tanic fractiond waste from

eters l performancy cals ater

ity consumpti

ment effects f pulps (nonds plastic, glas,) % in a pulp w

ry % VS

s l be includeQuality Man

ummary ed values of

types of wasn from housm supermark

Tce

on

egradable metal of with DM

9

9

d as an appnual.

f tested para

ste the perfosehold wastket 25 %, 2

Target Mea 5-6 Nonapprwas

20-3

95 % Test

pulpTestpulp

90 % TeststanTeststan

endix in the

ameters.

ormance pare Vejle Kom5% dairy w

asured value

ton organic wne rox. 1 ton wat

ste

30 kwh/ton wa

t with A >99.p with 15% TSt with B >99.p with 15% TSt with A: 94.8

ndard deviationt with B: 95.9

ndard deviation

e verificatio

rameters in mmune was

waste and 50

waste /h

ter/ton wet

aste

.86 % in S .96 % in S

8 % with n of 0.7 %

9 % with n 0.6 %

on report acc

the table beste sorting s0% of (A)

Method/com Based on tes Based on tes

based on contests

cording to t

elow were osystem.

mment

st.

st.

nsumption in

9

the

obtained:

the

9

It is con• t

e• t

t

Tes1.8. The testconditiocycles uoperatio The plan

Tes1.9.For eachmeasurevalidate

1.10.The test The foll The handrying) the orga The orgnot enoumaterial

Ref4.

Appen Terms a Table 4.1

ncluded for the purity oetc. >2 mmthe recoverythe two test

st Perform

t was designons and withused in the tons of the eq

nt operated

st quality h batch run ements. Fure the accura

Ammendt plan was f

lowing devi

nd sorting oas this was

anic materia

ganic fractiough material was crush

ferences

dix 1 Term

and definitio

1 Terms and

ECOGI sysof pulp is hig

m) y is high (apts)

mance obs

ned to test th two differtest, the dataquipment.

well with n

assurancmass balan

rther mass bcy of the m

dments to followed exc

iations were

f the solid r judged a m

als (etc. veg

ons from 2 -al for the ched in a mor

s

ms and def

ons used in

definitions u

stem: gh (>99.8 w

pproximate

servation

he ECOGI rent sorts ofa observed c

no accidenti

e summarnces were cabalances weethod.

and deviacept from m

e made from

reject fractiomore securegetables like

- 40 mm wehain cruchertar for subs

finitions

the protoco

sed by the DA

weight %) w

ly 95% of t

equipmentf waste. By can be judg

ial operation

ry incl. aualculated to ere made for

ations fromminor adjust

m the test pl

ons was persorting met

e carrots wh

ere not crushr to work. Insampling.

ol are explai

ANETV test

when measur

the organic w

performancchoosing th

ged as being

n stops duri

udit resultsvalidate the

r the sorting

m test plantments in th

lan:

rformed direthod becaus

hich loose co

hed in the chnstead parts

ined in Tabl

centres.

ring the con

waste is rec

ce under reahe amount og representat

ing the 2 day

s e measured g and washin

n he sorting pr

ectly after wse it was moolor and for

hain crucheof the sorte

le 4.1.

ntent of plas

covered in th

alistic operaof replicate ative for mo

ay test

d mass and fng procedu

rocedure

washing (wiore easy to rrm when dry

er, because ted out organ

10

stic, glass

he pulp in

ating operating st

flow re to

ithout recognize ying).

there was nic

0

Word

Analyticalaboratory

Applicati

DANETV

(DANETcentre

Effect

(Environmproduct

Environmtechnolog

Evaluatio

Experts

Matrix

Method

DA

al y

Induse

ion Theresplim

V Danenv

TV) test Preverwitbod

The

mental) Reaprobastech

mental gy

Theknoare

on Evatechand

Indtech

Thepro

Genrule

ANETV

dependent analed to analyse t

e use of a prodpect to matrix

mitations

nish centre fovironmental te

eliminary namrification bodith a verificatiody

e way the targ

ady to market oduct, process,sed upon an enhnology

e practical appowledge in thea

aluation of teshnology produd data quality

dependent pershnology in ve

e type of mateoduct is intend

neric documenes, guidelines

lytical laborattest samples

duct specifiedx, target, effect

r verification echnologies

me for the es in DANET

on and a test su

get is affected

or prototype , system or sernvironmental

plication of e environment

st data for a uct for perform

sons qualifiederification

erial that the ded for

nt that provideor characteris

ComDAN

tory The analysubc

d with t and

The withuser judgcompcond

of

TV sub-

Namfinalhas b

The reduperio

stage ervice

The and svend

tal The variesyste

mance Non

d on a ThesexpeETVexpe

Matrwate

des stics

An inin th

mments on NETV app

test centre maytical laborato

contractor

application mh a precision th

of a product ve whether his parable to the

ditions

me will be chanl nomenclaturebeen set.

effect could buction, decreasod, pH increas

product is thesold and thus

dor submit for

term technoloety of productems and servic

e

se experts mayerts, QA experV systems or reerts

rices could beer, ground wat

n-house methhe absence of a

the proach

ay use an ory as

must be definedhat allows the verification toneeds are verification

nged, when the in the EU ET

be concentratiose in treatmentse etc

e item producethe item that averification

ogy is coverings, processes, ces.

y be technical rts for other egulatory

soil, drinkingter etc.

od may be usea standard, if

d

o

he TV

on t

ed a

g a

l

g

ed

11

Word

Performaclaim

Performaparamete

Procedure

Producer

Proposer

Standard

Target

Test centsub-body

Test centrverificatiobody

Test/testin

DA

for

ance Theon inte

ance rs

Parquaprothe env

e Detstanbod

The

Anyoutpreenvverpro

Genconrecthatcha

Thepro

tre, test y

Subplan

re, on sub-

Subplan

ng Detof a

ANETV

tests or analy

e effects foresthe target (s) iended use

rameters that cantitatively in ovide the relev

performance vironmental te

tailed descriptndard or a medy

e party produc

y legal entity tside the Europesenting an innvironmental terification undeogramme

neric documennsensus and apognized standt provides rule

aracteristics fo

e property thaoduct

b-body of the ns and perform

b-body of the ns and perform

termination ofa product for p

ysis

seen by the vein the matrix o

can be documtests and that

vant informatioof an

echnology pro

tion of the usethod within on

cing the produ

established inpean Union novative echnology for er the EU ETV

nt establishedpproved by a dardization boes, guidelines

or tests or anal

at is affected b

test centre thams test

test centre thams the verific

f the performaparameters de

ComDAN

prepformstand

endor of

Non

mented t on on

oduct

The be esapplirequ(reguand v

e of a ne

The implmethequip

uct Non

n or

V pilot

Non

d by

dy or lysis

Non

by the Targconc

at Non

at ation

Non

ance efined

Non

mments on NETV app

ared in complmat and contendards.

e

performance pstablished conication(s) of th

uirements of soulations), custvendor claims

procedure spelementing a sthod in terms opment used

e

e

e

gets could be ecentration

e

e

e

the proach

liance with thents required fo

parameters munsidering the he product, thociety tomers (needs)s

ecifies andard or a

of e.g.:

e.g.. contamin

e or

must

he

)

nant

12

2

Word

Vendor

Verificati

AppenTest The test(see 3.4 Before tcalibrati Calibra All weig4.46 kg) Table 2 TWeight small w20 kg w30 kg w All weig The inpweighin CalibratThe are

DA

for

Thethe

ion Evaparappconassu

dix 2

t was perfor4).

the actual teing the equi

ation

ghts used w) which wer

Test results

weight (g) weight (kg) weight (kg)

ghts measur

put amount ong cells on K

tion of flowa of the bas

ANETV

the applicatio

e party delivercustomer

aluation of prorameters for a plication undenditions and adurance

Te

rmed as des

est, a prerunipment.

were calibratre weighed

red within t

of added waKomteks wh

w transmittersin was mea

on

ring the produ

oduct performspecified r defined dequate qualit

st data re

scribed in th

n was perfor

ted using prusing DTIs

reference129.08 4.46 4.46

the accuracy

aste and theheel loader.

rs was perfoasured to 1.4

ComDAN

uct to Can

mance

ty

Non

port

he test plan

rmed on 10

reweighed cs calibrated

e

y of reading

e output amo.

ormed by us4*11.7 = 16

mments on NETV app

be the produc

e

except mino

.dec 2012 f

calibration blaboratory w

g.

ount of reje

sing the bas6.38 m2.

the proach

cer

or deviation

for testing th

bottles with weights.

measured129 4.45 4.4

ct was weig

sin M7 for m

n in sorting

he method a

h water (129

d

ghed using c

measuring th

13

method

and

9.08 g and

calibrated

he amount.

3

Table 3 Ttest 1 2 The resuarea me SortingBased oenough Based othe solidsorting m Tests peTests won 12.de The test

• R• Sa

• Sa

Docume Samplin3 subsammixing

Test of flow tadded FT6.1 2.4

ult is accepteasurement

g test on the preru

material fo

on drying trid reject fracmethod as m

erformed were perform

ecember us

t included thecording alampling of

o analo anal

metampling of

o subso waso sort

degro dryio Ana

entation pho

ng of produmples wereand subsam

ransmitter FT1 (m3)

table within(1 cm heigh

un it was decr the chain

ials and inspctions directmaterials w

med 11.deceing 50 % w

he followinl input and produced pulysis of VS lysis of purial, plastic) breject sampling ofhing of subing reject inradable mating subsampalysis of Vo

otos from se

uced pulp e taken durinmpling while

T1 by addingmeasured (39 14.8

n the uncertaht correspon

cided to runcrucher to w

pection of thtly after wasere more ea

ember usingwaste from V

g steps accooutput weigulp and TS of pity of pulp (by washing

f reject for tsample in s

n non-degratter and weiples of sortelatile solids

elected indi

ng pumpinge stirring.

g of water pe(cm) Calc

6.392.42

ainty of heinds to a volu

n without thwork.

he waste it shing withoasily recogn

g organic waVejle and 50

ording to teghts as well

pulp (amount of

g, sorting an

testing contspecial machadable matteighing (wet)ed reject ands content (or

ividual step

g to storage

rformed dec.culated addi9 2 ight measurume change

e chain crus

was decideout drying anized.

aste collecte0% waste fr

st plan: l as power c

non-degradnd weighing

ent of organhinery er (plastic, m) d weighingrganic matt

s in the test

tank and tra

.10th 2013 ition (m3)

ement of the of 0.164 m

sher, becaus

d to performs this was ju

ed from hourom industry

consumption

dable matter

nic waste

metal, glass

for dry mater)

are shown

ansferred to

Differen-4.5 -0.8

he basin (1 cm3).

se there was

m the hand sudged a mo

useholds in y.

n for each te

r > 2 mm –

s/stones) and

tter analysis

below.

o a large buc

14

nce %

cm) and

s not

sorting of ore secure

Vejle and

est run

glass,

d

s

cket for

4

Figure 3 AnalysiA 1 litreparticles

Figure 4

Sampling of

is of purity e subsamples for drying

Washing of p

f pulp

of pulp e of the pulpg and weigh

pulp to estim

p was washhing.

mate purity

hed on a 2 mmm sieve as shown belo

ow before c

15

ollection of

5

f

SamplinThe rejeone batc

Figure 5 The 3 bweighin

Figure 6

ng of rejectect was collch was trans

Collection of

atches in a ng cells of th

Mixing of 3 b

t lected in a csferred to a

f reject from

test run werhe wheel lo

batches to on

container wiclean stora

one batch in

re mixed usader

ne sample rep

ith drainageage facility f

container

sing a large

presenting a t

e of water tofor mixing a

wheel load

test run and w

o floor tank.and weighin

er and weig

weighing with

. The containg.

ghed using t

h wheel loade

16

iner with

the

er

6

From thand filli The squ The contogetherwash. T The use1: washcollectin2: washcollectin3: washinto a co4: remo

4am(F4b4c

5: The <amount 6: remo

6ahala6b6c

7: Fromthoroug 8: SampA repre

he mixed 3 bing a 60 litr

uare bucket

ntent was wr with wash

The amount

ed sorting prhing with 48ng bucket w

hing with 20ng bucket w

hing with 20ollecting bu

oval of >40 ma: The rejec

metal, glass, Figure 10) b: The matec: The non-o< 10 mm frawas small a

oval of 2 - 40a: Sorting a and in non-darger than 5*b: The matec: The non-o

m the organicgh mixing fo

pling of wassentative sa

batches a ree square bu

was now so

eighed and hing water (F

was washed

rocedure (ap8 litre cold wwith a 10 mm0 litre cold wwith a 10 mm0 litre hot wucket with amm reject f

ct fraction >bones and s

erial was weorganic mataction incluand it was s0 mm rejectrepresentat

degradable *5*5 mm anerial was weorganic mat

c fraction >or analysis o

shing water ample was t

epresentativucket.

orted accord

transferred Figure 7). Td in three st

ppendix 3, twater for apm screen water for apm screen ater (30-40º

a 10 mm scrfor sorting 40 mm wassticks with d

eighed (wet)terial was d

uding washinsorted togetht for sortingtive sample material (plnd organic meighed terial was d

> 40 mm andof TS and V

aken from w

ve sample w

ding to the p

d to a cemenThe averageteps while r

test plan) ispprox. 10 mi

pprox. 10 mi

ºC) for apprreen (Figure

s hand sortedimensions

) dried and weng water waher with the

g of approx.

lastics, metmaterial (Fi

dried and we

d 2 - 40 mmVS.

washing wa

was taken by

procedure in

nt mixer wite weight warotating.

s summarizeinutes, deca

inutes, deca

rox. 10 mine 8)

ed in non-de larger than

eighed as filtered oe 10-40 mm

20% of the al, glass, boigure 11)

eighed

m proportion

ater to furthe

y using a gra

n appendix

h a 40 mm s approxima

ed below anting of wa

anting of wa

utes, decant

egradable mn 5*5*5 mm

on a 2 mm sm fraction.

reject fractones and stic

nal subsamp

er analysis o

ab randomly

3 of the test

screen in frmately 15 kg

ater by tiltin

ater by tiltin

nting of wate

material (plam and organi

screen (Figu

tion 2 - 40 mcks with dim

ples were pr

of TS and V

17

y picking

t plan.

ront for each

ng into a

ng into a

er by tilting

stics, ic material

ure 9). The

mm by mensions

repared by

VS

7

g

Figure 7

Figure 8

Washing in c

Collection of

cement mixer

f 10 - 40 mm

r with 40 mm

reject from w

m screen

washing

18

8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Collection of

0 Sorting of >

f 2 - 10 mm r

> 40 mm was

eject from w

hed reject fra

ashing

action

19

9

Figure 11 Total SoTS and possible The dryweight aused, as

1 Hand sortin

olids and VVS was ana

e by using a

ying methodafter 2 and s the drying

ng of 2-40 mm

Volatile solidalyzed on oa mortar.

d for organic3 days. Thewould have

m fraction on

ds analysisrganic samp

c fraction use low tempee been too t

n sorting tabl

ples that we

sed was 103erature optiotime consum

le

ere manually

3 °C for 4 don in test plming.

y homogeni

days, as theran appendix

ized as thor

re still was lx 3 (50 °C)

20

roughly as

loss of was not

0

Test resDuring Table 9

• InTd

• A

T

• ToTt

• PuT

• W

Tw

• RTd

• PoTk

sults and Mall tests the.

nput of wastThe amoundistributed

Amount of wThe amoun

otal water fThe total amtransmitters

ulp to storagThe amoun

Washing watThe washinwater follow

eject The amoundistributed

ower consumThe power kWh counte

Mass Balance following p

te (waste in t was only wevenly betw

water to pulpt is added u

for Reject semount for res. This amou

ge tank t is measure

ter ng steps is dwed by 2.3

t was only wevenly betw

mption consumptioer before an

ces parameters

ton) weighed forween the 3 b

per using FT1

eparation eject separaunt is transf

ed using FT

divided in 2 m3 fresh wa

weighed forween the 3 b

on of the pland after the

were record

r the sum ofbatch tests

ation was meferred to the

T2

steps with aater

r the sum ofbatch tests

ant includincombined 3

ded as show

f 3 batch tes

easured by e pulp in the

approx. 1.5

f 3 batch tes

ng ventilatio3 batch tests

wn in Table

sts and there

reading amoe rejection s

m3 in first s

sts and there

on was recors in each tes

4 to

efore has be

mounts addedstep.

step using t

efore has be

rded by reast run

21

een

d by flow

technical

een

ding the

Table 4 T11.dec.1Waste inAmount Water leReject seTotal sepPulp to sWashingother waPure watReject oReject oMass baInput waOutput perror in kWh befkWh aftePower co

Exampl Input wOutput p

Test A test ru13 A‐T1 nput ton of water add

evel after wateeparation paration watestorage tank mg ater washing (ter for washinut ut ton alance aste + water pulp + reject mass balancefore er onsumption k

le calculatio

waste and wapulp and rej

un T1

ed to pulper (er addition (c

er added to pum3 FT2

(estimated) * ng m3

%

kWh

on of mass b

ater = 2.23 +ject = 9.3 +

b

(m3) FT1 m)

ulp

balance A-T

+ 2 + 6.5 =+ 0.48 = 9.78

batch 1 batc2.233

286

6.59.3

1.52.3

0.48

10.739.788.85

253515

T1, batch 1:

10.73 ton 8 ton

ch 2 b2.233

2104

6.79.2

1.52.3

0.48

10.939.68

11.43

batch 3 Sum2.233

2130

6.59.5

1.52.5

0.48

10.739.986.99

253709

194

m or average 6.76

19.728

4.57.1

1.45

32.4029.45 9.1

22

7 6

7 8

5 1

5

0 5 1

2




evel after wateeparation paration watestorage tank mg ater washing ter for washinut ut ton alance aste + water pulp + reject mass balancefore er onsumption k



un T2



ng m3

%

kWh

un T3



ng m3

%

kWh

bat

(m3) FT1 m)

ulp

2

bat

(m3) FT1 m)

ulp

2

tch 1 batch2.333 2.3

2104

7

9.3

1.32.3

0.52 0

11.33 109.82 9

13.38 1153752

tch 1 batch2.167 2.

2

6.89.5

1.42.3

0.49 0

10.97 109.99 98.94 5

53922

h 2 batch 3333 2.3332 2

6.1 6.558.7 8.4

2 1.652.3 2.3

0.52 0.52

0.43 10.889.22 8.921.66 18.07

253922

170

h 2 batch 3167 2.1672 2

6.4 6.69.5 9.4

1.5 1.32.3 2.3

0.49 0.49

0.57 10.779.99 9.895.49 8.17

254086

164

Sum or ave32

54 53

2

827

2 0

Sum or ave72

64

33

9

797

6 4

erage 76

19.6526.4

4.956.9

1.55

32.6527.95 14.4

erage 6.56

19.828.4

4.26.9

1.46

32.329.86 7.55

23

3


* for this Table 8 T12.dec.1Waste inAmount Water leReject seTotal sepPulp to sWashingother waPure watReject oReject oMass baInput waOutput perror in kWh befkWh aftePower co

Test B test ru13 B‐T1 nput ton of water add

evel after wateeparation paration watestorage tank mg ater washing ter for washinut ut ton alance aste + water pulp + reject mass balancefore er onsumption ktest the powe



un T1



ng m3

%

kWh er consumptionun T2



ng m3

%

kWh

bat

(m3) FT1 m)

ulp

n for the test

bat

(m3) FT1 m)

ulp

2


2104.5

6.910.9

1.22.3

0.53 0

11.17 911.43 8‐2.39 9

0 2543

run was calcu


2

710

1.32.3

0.50 0

11.78 1110.50 1010.89 1154538

h 2 batch 3267 2.2672 2

5.6 7.48.4 10

2.8 1.12.3 2.3

0.53 0.53

9.87 11.678.93 10.539.46 9.71399

254493141*

ulated from tw

h 2 batch 3783 2.7832 2

7 7.19.9 10.6

1.3 1.22.3 2.3

0.50 0.50

1.78 11.880.40 11.101.74 6.59

254693

155

Sum or ave72

40

13

3

731

3 *

wo batch runs

Sum or ave32

16

23

0

809

3 5

erage 6.86

19.929.3

5.16.9

1.6

32.730.9 5.5

erage 8.35

6

21.130.5

3.86.9

1.5

35.4532

9.73

24

4

Table 9 T12.dec.1Waste inAmount Water leReject seTotal sepTo storaWashingother waPure watReject oReject oMass baInput waOutput perror in kWh befkWh aftePower co

The calcThe erroreading on the p Table 1 Table 10

Test teA A A B B B

The wattechnicaproduceoptimisebatch w


evel after wateeparation paration watege tank m3 FTg ater washing ter for washinut ut ton alance aste + water pulp + reject mass balancefore er onsumption k

culated masor may be derrors in FT

pulp.

0 shows wa

0 Waste amou

est run Inputon

1 2 3 1 2 3

ter consumpal water (reced by dewated. Based o

which is appr

un T3


er added to puT2

ng m3

%

kWh

ss balances due to an errT1 and 2. It

aste in- and

unts and powut waste (wet)

Oto

6.70 7.00 6.50 6.80 8.35 7.90

ption of purcycled fromtering of theon the test 2roximately

bat

(m3) FT1 m)

ulp

2

for the 3 tesror in readint was not pr

-outputs an

er consumptiOutput Pulp on(wet)

2826.428.429.330.529.6

re water is am earlier pule pulp by a d.3 ton of puthe same as


2

710

1.32.3

0.54 0

11.63 1110.54 109.40 11

54706

sts have aveng of FT2 oractically po

nd power co

ion Output reton (wet)

844356

at present unlpings) is usdewatering

ure water was the added

h 2 batch 3633 2.6332 2

7 79.8 9.8

1.3 1.32.3 2.3

0.54 0.54

1.63 11.630.34 10.341.12 11.12

254877

171

erage errorsof approximossible to ca

onsumption

eject kWh u

1.451.551.461.61.5

1.62

nder improvsed for new technology

as needed foamount of w

Sum or ave32

78

33

4

342

7 1

s between 5 ately -10 %

alibrate the f

for each tes

used kWh/194170164141155171

vement. In npulpings. T

y which is pror washing wet waste.

erage 7.96

2129.6

3.96.9

1.62

34.931.22 10.5

and 14 wei% or a combi

flow transm

st run.

/ton input w222212

normal operThe technicaresently beithe reject o

25

ight %. ination of

mitter FT2

et 29.024.325.220.718.621.6

ration al water is ing

of each

5

Analy Purity In Figur

Figure 12 The tabTS as th Test te

r

A 1A 2A 3B 1B 2B 3

The imp

ysis resu

re 12 the co

2 Inorganic

le below shhis is the typ

est un

biopuweigh(g)

1 1000.2 1000.3 1000.1 1000.2 1000.3 1000.purities >2 m

ults

ontent of res

dried residue

hows the anapical produc

lp hed

TS pul

00 4.99 00 5.88 00 6.13 00 6.41 00 6.93 00 6.8 mm amount

sidue (2-6 m

e (2 - 6 mm) o

alysis data fct quality af

lp % TSco‐ 60.0.0.0.0.0.

ts to

mm) in 1 lit

of 1 liter pulp

for calculatifter dewater

S inorganic omponents 6 mm (g) .4555 .7909 .3125 .1623 .1969 .1958

ter pulp from

p from test ru

ing purity. Tring using a

2 % inorganin pulp

0.05 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02

m the purity

uns

The purity ia screw pres

nic % inorpulp wDM 0.14 0.20 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.04

y analysis i

is recalculatss.

rganic in with 15%

26

s shown.

ted to 15 %

6

A averaB avera The par The purA > 99.B > 99.9in a pulp Recover The tabaccordinfrom 2 -biogasifwashing In the so Non deg

• M• Pl• ot• w

Fraction

• or

age: 0.14 % age: 0.04 %

rticles have

rity (amount86 % 96 % p with a cal

ry

le below shng to the pr- 40 mm. Thfication andg water cont

orting proce

grable fractMetal

lastic, rubbether inorgan

wood pieces,

ns degradabrganic waste

standard destandard de

to pass a 6

t of non-deg

lculated TS

hows resultsrocedure usihe hand sor

d organic fratained parti

edure the m

ions in biog

er and textilnic material, sticks and

ble in biogase from hous

eviation 0.0eviation 0.0

mm sieve in

gradable ma

of 15 wt %

from weighing washingrting producactions whiccles and sol

material is di

gasification

les s like stonebones with

sification inseholds and

06 % 02 % when

n the rejecti

aterial like p

%

hing of the g and hand sced a numbech are degralubilized or

ivided into :

including:

s ,ceramics dimensions

ncluding: d industry

n recalculate

ion separato

plastics, gla

reject sampsorting of frer of fractioadable in birganics < 2 m

:

and glass s >5*5*5 m

ed to 15 % T

or and there

ass and meta

ples. The samractions largons which arogasificatiomm.

mm

TS.

efore cannot

al) are

mples wereger than 40 re nondegraon. Further t

27

t be larger.

e treated mm and

adable in the

7

Table 11

Test

teru

A 1A 2A 3B 1B 2B 3

The wei There is The madeviatio Figure 13testrun A A A B B B

The watin the so An exam In Figur

Weighing of

est un

Sample input (kg wet)

1 15.1

2 14.1

3 14.1

1 10.95

2 13.95

3 13.1

ights for 2 -

s a minor lo

ss balance oons.

3 Mass balanbatch

123123

ter loss of 0orting proce

mple of the

re 15 the no

reject

wash water

input (kg)

Da

79 76 75 75 75 79.5

- 40 mm are

oss of water

of input (be

nce before andinput

1 94.10 2 90.10 3 89.10 1 85.95 2 88.95 3 92.60

0.6 -6 % is aedure.

sorted fract

on plastic an

Drained reject after washing

(kg wet)

17.42 17.49 17.10 12.70 15.20 16.52

e based on s

during drai

fore washin

d after washioutput d

89.9788.3788.6981.9486.2486.78

acceptable w

tion > 40 m

nd textile co

Non‐degrabiogasifica

wet

> 40 mm

9.27 6.82 4.76 5.24 6.18 5.02

sorting and w

inage and so

ng) and outp

ing deviation %

‐4.4‐1.9‐0.5‐4.7‐3.1‐6.3

when taking

mm, textile a

ontent in a >

adable in tion (kg t)

Dbio

2 ‐ 40 mm

>m

3.01 04.54 04.60 03.03 03.16 04.30 0

weighing o

orting.

put (after w

g into accou

and plastics

>40 mm sor

Degradable inogasification (

wet)

> 40 mm

2 ‐ 40mm

0.52 4.570.26 4.650.29 5.740.29 2.790.48 3.120.38 4.56

f 20 % of th

ashing) sho

unt the large

s is shown in

ting fraction

n (kg

0 m

wash watdrained o

(kg) 7 72.60 5 72.10 4 73.30 9 70.60 2 73.30 6 72.53

he wet samp

ows the follo

e number of

n Figure 14

n is shown.

28

ter off organic

wet (%)29.3 30.2 39.2 27.1 27.8 34.6

ple.

owing

f operations

4.

8

Figure 14

Figure 15 An exam

4 Sorted frac

5 Sorted frac

mple of the

ction >40 mm

ction >40 mm

sorted fract

m textile and p

m metal, organ

tion 2 - 40 m

plastics

nic residue an

mm is show

nd non bioga

wn in Figure

s degradable

e 16 to Figur

e woodsticks a

re 18

29

and bones

9

Figure 16

Figure 17

6 Sorted frac

7 Sorted frac

ction 2-40 mm

ction 2-40 mm

m organic fra

m plastic frac

action

ction

30

0

Figure 18 The conconsidedevelop The conthe total In Tableare show

8 Sorted frac

ntent of stickred to be de

ped or instal

ntent was bel amount of

e 12 Total Swn.

ction 2-40 mm

ks, bones wegradable inlled at full s

etween 6-12f sorted was

Solids and V

m textile, met

with dimensin biogasificascale biogas

2% of the orste (Wet wei

Volatile soli

als, bones an

ions >5*5*5ation withou

s plants.

rganic food ight).

ids of the so

nd sticks

5 mm was mut severe pr

waste (wet

orted organi

measured inretreatment

t weight) or

ic fractions

n test B. Thewhich is ye

between 2-

and the was

31

ese are not et not

-3.3 % of

shing water

r

Table 12

BiopulpA A A B B B Reject 2mm A A A B B B Washinwater A A A B B B

Table 1

TS and VS o

p test

2‐40

g

3 and Table

of organic con

t run TS % 1 42 3 1 2 3

1 142 13 11 142 13 1

1 2 3 1 2 3

e 14 show c

ntent in fractStandadev. %

4.99 05.88 06.13 06.41 06.93 06.80 0

4.49 15.63 05.38 04.71 05.10 05.36 0

0.16 00.17 00.22 00.18 00.14 00.15 0

alculations

tions ard % VS % .52 88.4.44 88.4.06 88.3.09 90.3.11 90.4.11 90.2

.12 81.3

.16 83.3

.62 90.6

.09 87.0

.51 92.2

.45 87.8

.00 69.6

.01 74.8

.01 73.8

.01 74.2

.00 73.6

.00 76.6

of recovery

Standarddev. %

43 0.1748 0.0936 0.9233 0.6642 0.6127 0.46

37 4.1537 4.6160 3.0905 0.2426 1.8984 5.05

63 0.5386 2.1684 1.9625 2.7266 2.6760 2.06

y.

d

792616

519495

366276

32

2

Table 13Test runBiopulpTS % VS % BiopulpReject tOrganicOrganicOrganicOrganicOrganicOrganic% recov

% recov Exampl Biopulp OrganicOrganicton WashinInput = washing OrganicOrganic Thus fowater or As the b0.057)/1

Results for tn p tons Input

p VS ton Inputons c % (wet) c ton (wet) c DM % c VS % c VS ton excluc VS ton incluvery

very for test

le calculatio

p in VS = 28

c reject wet c reject excl

ng water add17.42 kg or

g water = 72

c content (exc content wa

or T1 we havr in total 0.0

biopulp con1.23*100 =

test A

ut

uding washinuding washin

t A: 94.8 %

on T1:

8 * 4.99 * 8

= 1.45 * 29luding wash

dition T1 rganic wet c

2.6 kg with

xcl. washinashing wate

ve additiona057 ton VS

ntains 1.23 t95.4%.

1

ng water ng water

with standa

88.43/100/10

9.3/100 = 0.hing water V

content 0.52

TS = 0.16%

g water) in er in VS = 7

al 50 *0.081in the rejec

on VS the r

1 228

4.9988.431.231.45

29.300.42

14.4981.370.0500.05795.41

ard deviatio

00 = 1.23 to

.42 ton VS ton = 1.4

2 + 4.57 = 5

% VS = 69.6

VS = (0.5272.6*0.16*6

1/0.6 = 6.75ct

recovery for

3 26.45.88

88.481.371.55

30.180.47

15.6383.370.0610.07094.93

on = 0.68 %

on

45*29.3/100

5.09 kg with

63%

+4.57)*14.469.63/100/10

5 kg VS to t

r batch 1 ca

28.46.13

88.361.541.46

39.160.57

15.3890.600.0800.09194.07

0*14.49*81

h DM 14.49

49*81.37/100 = 0.081

the 50 kg ex

n be calcula

1.37/100/10

9% VS = 81

00/100 = 0.kg

xcluding wa

ated to (1.23

33

0=0.050

1.37%

.60 kg

ashing

3-

3

Table 14 Test runBiopulpTS % VS % BiopulpReject tOrganicOrganicOrganicOrganicOrganicOrganic% recov

% recov Discuss The resu

• a l

• a The recoallowpapeproc Somremdepe

AppenNo ame

4 Results for t

n p tons Input

p VS ton Inputons c % (wet) c ton (wet) c TS % c VS % c VS ton excluc VS ton incluvery

very for test

sion and co

ults show high purity larger than recovery >9

organic maovery it is exw most of ter like dryincess and no

me sticks anmoved with t

end on the c

dix 3 Ameendments an

test B

ut

uding washinuding washin

t B: 95.9 %

nclusion

of the prod2 mm. 94.8% of or

aterial will bxpected thathe material ng paper foridentifiable

d bones andthe reject. Tcomposition

endment and deviation

1

ng water ng water

with standa

duced pulp w

rganic mater

be in the fort the organito pass the

r kitchen use larger part

d wood piecThe amount n of collecte

and deviatns are descri

1 229.36.41

90.331.701.6

27.130.43

14.7187.050.060.07

95.96

ard deviatio

with less tha

rial

rm of food wic material i 6 mm scree

se is also exts of paper w

ces are too sof these pared waste.

tions repoibed here (d

3 30.56.93

90.421.911.5

27.800.42

15.1092.260.060.07

96.49

on = 0.6 %

an 0.14% pa

waste from is partly dowen holes in pected be dwas found i

solid to be drts was limi

ort for testdeviations to

29.66.80

90.271.821.62

34.620.56

15.3687.840.080.09

95.31

articles of p

householdswnsized in tthe sorting

disintegratedn sorted fra

down sized ited in the te

t o test plan a

plastic, glass

s. Based on the pulping unit. Loose

d by the pulactions.

in the proceests but will

are given in

34

s, metal

the high process to

ely bound lping

ess and are l of course

n part 3.4)

4

ecogi pre- f biom ass for anaerobic - danetv - the danish ... · f biom and separ or biogas 2013...

Documents