economic bulletin (vol. 32, no.1)

Upload: republic-of-korea-koreanet

Post on 30-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    1/67

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    2/67

    The Green Book: Current Economic TrendsOverview 3

    1. Global economy 4

    2. Private consumption 8

    3. Facility investment 12

    4. Construction investment 14

    5. Exports and imports 16

    6. Mining and manufacturing production 18

    7. Service sector activity 20

    8. Employment 22

    9. Financial markets 24

    9.1 Stock market9.2 Exchange rate9.3 Bond market9.4 Money supply & money market

    10. Balance of payments 28

    11. Prices and international commodity prices 30

    11.1 Prices11.2 International oil and commodity prices

    12. Real estate market 34

    12.1 Housing market12.2 Land market

    13. Composite indices of business cycle indicators 38

    Policy IssuesLabor union law revised 40

    Economic News Briefing 43

    Statistical Appendices 49

    Republic of Korea

    Economic Bulletin

    Vol. 32 | No. 1

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    3/67

    Economic Bulletin 3

    The Korean economy continued an upward trend as real economic indicators such asproduction, investment and exports stayed in a recovery phase, while financial marketsremained stable.

    Mining and manufacturing production in November rose 1.4 percent month-on-month and17.8 percent year-on-year. Service output fell 1.2 percent month-on-month, affected by theH1N1 flu pandemic. On a year-on-year basis, however, the index rose 3.3 percent.

    Consumer goods sales slightly declined month-on-month by 0.9 percent in November due todrops in semi-durable and non-durable goods sales, while the indicator accelerated a year-on-year rise from 9.8 to 10.0 percent, backed by a low base effect and growing durable goodssales.

    Facilities investment increased in November by 7.0 percent month-on-month and 10.3percent year-on-year, helped by recovering machinery investment. Construction completed,thanks to the private sector posting a year-on-year rise in nine months, grew both month-on-month and year-on-year by 1.2 percent and 4.2 percent, respectively.

    Exports in December jumped 33.7 percent year-on-year, positively affected by a rise in majorexports including liquid crystal devices and a low base effect. Imports soared 24.0 percentyear-on-year, as imports of raw materials and capital goods rose and the low base lifted theindex.

    The total number of workers hired shed 10,000 year-on-year in November, as hiring in theagriculture, forestry & fishery significantly dropped. The unemployment rate slightlyincreased month-on-month from 3.2 to 3.3 percent.

    Consumer prices in December remained in the 2 percent range, despite rising prices ofagriculture, livestock & fishery products, of which the shipments declined due to a cold wave.

    In December, financial markets continued to be stable, as worries over Dubai Worldspossible default eased, a Koreas consortium won a contract to export nuclear facilities to theUnited Arab Emirate (UAE), and the stock market rallied reflecting expectations over aneconomic recovery, while the interest rate reversed to a slight increase.

    To sum up, although the Korean economy passed the critical stage and has continued toimprove, the recovery does not seem to be firmly entrenched, as the private sector is notstrong enough to drive consumption, investment and employment, and externaluncertainties including oil prices are still lingering.

    The Korean government, to secure economic recovery, will keep pursuing expansionary fiscal

    policies and spend budgets as planned, and at the same time it will continue to create jobsand support the working class. On the other hand, the government will step up its efforts toreform the economy through corporate restructuring and nurture growth potential, in orderto found a basis for a future economic take-off.

    The Green BookCurrent Economic Trends

    Overview

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    4/67

    4 January 2010

    1. Global economy

    The global economy is showing a gradual recovery as production and exports improved in

    advanced countries. However, potential threats to global economic stability including

    sluggish employment still remain.

    Also, concerns grew over sovereign debt risks as Standard & Poors revised its credit outlook

    for Spain to negative from stable on December 9, 2009 and Fitch cut Greece's credit rating to

    BBB+ from A- on December 8.

    The US revised down annualized quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth in the third quarter

    from 2.8 to 2.2 percent, as the level of inventory declined and investment in non-housing

    construction decelerated.

    In November, production and consumption continued upward trends, as industrialproduction increased 0.8 percent month-on-month, and retail sales 1.3 percent.

    Sales of existing homes in November jumped 7.4 percent from the previous month, backed

    by the tax credit, while new home sales fell 11.3 percent.

    In November, non-farm payrolls declined at a slightly slower pace, while the unemployment

    rate hovered over the 10-percent range, showing the sluggish labor market.

    The Federal Reserve announced in the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) on

    December 17, 2009 that it would maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0.0 to

    0.25 percent, along with the plan to complete the purchase of US$1.25 trillion of agencymortgage-backed securities and about US $175 billion of agency debt by the first quarter of

    2010.

    US

    (Percentage change from previous period)

    Annual Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Nov

    Real GDP1

    - Personal consumption expenditure

    - Corporate fixed investment

    - Construction investment for housing

    Industrial productionRetail sales

    New home sales

    New non-farm payroll employment(q-o-q, thousand)2

    Consumer prices (y-o-y, %)

    2008 2009

    1. Annualized rate (%)

    2. Monthly average

    Source: US Department of Commerce

    0.4

    -0.2

    1.6

    -22.9

    -1.8-0.7

    -37.4

    -257

    3.9

    -0.7

    -0.6

    1.9

    -28.2

    0.1-0.5

    -14.8

    -113

    4.2

    1.5

    0.1

    1.4

    -15.8

    -1.20.4

    -9.6

    -153

    4.3

    -2.7

    -3.5

    -6.1

    -15.9

    -2.3-1.5

    -9.8

    -208

    5.2

    -5.4

    -3.1

    -19.5

    -23.2

    -3.4-6.7

    -15.0

    -553

    1.5

    -6.4

    0.6

    -39.2

    -38.2

    -5.2-1.2

    -13.5

    -691

    -0.2

    -0.7

    -0.9

    -9.6

    -23.3

    -2.7-0.3

    9.9

    -428

    -0.9

    2.2

    2.8

    -5.9

    18.9

    1.51.6

    9.4

    -199

    -1.6

    -

    -

    -

    -

    0.81.3

    -11.3

    -11

    1.8

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    5/67

    Economic Bulletin 5

    US federal funds rate and consumer prices

    Source: US Federal Reserve Board & Department of Labor

    US non-farm payroll employment (m-o-m change)

    Source: US Department of Labor

    US GDP (q-o-q, annualized rate)

    Source: US Department of Commerce1-1

    1-2

    1-3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    6/67

    6 January 2010

    Investment and consumption in China continued to improve in November, with industrialproduction surging and exports declining at a much slower pace. The consumer price indexturned positive and home prices had accelerated a rise since June 2009, fanning concernsover a potential asset bubble.

    Japan revised down annualized quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth in the third quarter to0.3 percent, but automobile sales rose in overseas markets, helping exports and industrialproduction continue an upward march.

    The Cabinet Office unveiled on December 9, 2009 its new economic stimulus package of 7.2trillion yen (US$81 billion), which included employment promotion, while deflation took itscourse as consumer prices declined for the eighth straight month.

    Eurozones exports declined at a slower pace, whereas the unemployment rate in Octoberhit 9.8 percent, the highest since 1980, showing the depressed employment market. The EU,at the summit meeting on December 14, announced that the eurozone would maintaineconomic stimulus policies until a durable economic recovery takes hold, as uncertaintiesand vulnerabilities still lingered in the economy.

    China

    Japan

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Real GDP

    Fixed asset investment (accumulated)

    Retail sales

    Industrial production

    Exports

    Consumer prices

    Producer prices

    2008 2009

    Annual

    9.0

    26.1

    21.6

    12.9

    17.2

    5.9

    6.9

    Q1

    10.6

    25.9

    20.6

    16.4

    21.4

    8.0

    6.9

    Q2

    10.1

    26.8

    22.2

    15.9

    22.4

    7.8

    8.4

    Q3

    9.0

    27.6

    23.2

    13.0

    22.9

    5.3

    9.7

    Q4

    6.8

    26.1

    20.6

    6.4

    4.1

    2.5

    2.5

    Q1

    6.1

    28.6

    15.0

    5.1

    -19.7

    -0.6

    -4.6

    Q2

    7.9

    33.6

    15.0

    9.1

    -23.5

    -1.5

    -7.2

    Q3

    8.9

    33.3

    15.4

    12.4

    -20.7

    -1.3

    -7.7

    Oct

    -

    33.1

    16.2

    16.1

    -13.8

    -0.5

    -5.8

    Nov

    -

    32.1

    15.8

    19.2

    -1.2

    0.6

    -2.1

    Source: China National Bureau of Statistics

    Real GDP

    Industrial and mining production

    Retail sales (y-o-y, %)

    Exports (y-o-y, %)

    Consumer prices (y-o-y, %)

    2008 2009(Percentage change from previous period)

    Annual

    -0.7

    -3.4

    0.3

    -3.5

    1.4

    Q1

    1.4

    0.3

    1.8

    5.9

    1.0

    Q2

    -2.1

    -1.5

    0.2

    1.8

    1.4

    Q3

    -1.0

    -3.3

    0.8

    3.2

    2.2

    Q4

    -2.7

    -17.7

    -1.5

    -23.1

    1.0

    Q1

    -3.1

    -17.2

    -3.9

    -46.9

    -0.1

    Q2

    0.7

    14.6

    -0.9

    -38.5

    -1.0

    Q3

    0.3

    5.9

    -3.4

    -34.4

    -2.2

    Oct

    -

    0.5

    -1.0

    -23.2

    -2.5

    Nov

    -

    2.6

    -1.0

    -6.3

    -1.9

    Source: Japan's Statistics Bureau and Statistics Centre

    Home prices (y-o-y, %)-1.1 (Apr 2009) -0.6 (May) 0.2 (Jun) 1.0 (Jul) 2.0 (Aug) 2.8 (Sep) 3.9 (Oct) 5.7 (Nov)

    Eurozone

    Source: Eurostat

    Real GDP

    Industrial production

    Retail sales

    Exports (y-o-y, %)

    Consumer prices (y-o-y, %)

    2008 2009

    (Percentage change from previous period)

    Annual

    0.8

    -1.7

    -0.7

    3.6

    3.3

    Q1

    0.8

    0.9

    0.3

    6.5

    3.3

    Q2

    -0.3

    -1.1

    -0.6

    8.0

    3.6

    Q3

    -0.4

    -1.8

    -0.5

    5.3

    3.8

    Q4

    -1.9

    -7.6

    -0.9

    -5.0

    2.3

    Q1

    -2.4

    -8.7

    -0.8

    -20.9

    1.0

    Q2

    -0.2

    -1.2

    -0.3

    -23.2

    0.2

    Q3

    0.4

    2.1

    -0.3

    -19.3

    -0.4

    Oct

    -

    -0.6

    0.1

    -16.8

    -0.1

    Nov

    -

    -

    -

    -

    0.5

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    7/67

    Economic Bulletin 7

    Eurozone GDP growth and industrial production

    Source: Eurostat

    Japans GDP growth

    Source: Cabinet Office & Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan

    Chinas GDP and fixed asset investment

    Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China1-4

    1-5

    1-6

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    8/67

    8 January 2010

    2. Private consumption

    Private consumption (preliminary GDP) in the third quarter increased 1.5 percent quarter-on-

    quarter, or 0.8 percent year-on-year.

    Consumer goods sales in November edged down 0.9 percent month-on-month, but rose 10.0

    percent year-on-year, posting an increase for the seventh consecutive month.

    On a month-on-month basis, durable goods sales was up 4.4 percent for the third straight

    month, whereas semi-durable and non-durable goods sales fell 1.9 percent and 3.3 percent,

    respectively. On a year-on-year basis, durable goods sales jumped 39.5 percent, thanks to

    solid automobiles sales backed by tax incentives, while sales of semi-durable and non-

    durable goods rose 1.3 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively.

    Sales at department stores rose 5.5 percent, continuing an upward track for nine months in

    a row, while sales at specialized retailers posted double-digit growth for the second straight

    month.

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Consumer goods sales

    (Seasonally adjusted)2

    - Durable goods3

    Automobiles

    - Semi-durable goods4

    - Non-durable goods5

    1. Preliminary

    2. Percentage change from previous period

    3. Durable goods: Automobiles, electronic appliances, furniture, telecommunications devices, etc.

    4. Semi-durable goods: Clothing, footwear, etc.

    5. Non-durable goods: Food, medicine, cosmetics, fuel, tobaccos, etc.

    Source: Statistics Korea

    2008 2009

    Annual

    1.0

    -

    1.9

    -2.0

    -2.4

    0.7

    Q2

    2.9

    -1.3

    8.7

    7.1

    -2.1

    0.3

    Q3

    1.4

    -0.1

    0.0

    -4.9

    0.6

    1.2

    Q4

    -4.2

    -3.5

    -9.9

    -19.5

    -9.9

    -0.4

    Q1

    -4.9

    0.4

    -13.6

    -21.3

    -0.9

    -1.4

    Q2

    1.6

    5.0

    4.0

    18.4

    0.3

    1.0

    Q3

    3.4

    1.5

    9.9

    29.7

    0.2

    2.0

    Sep

    6.6

    1.7

    26.1

    65.7

    2.6

    0.3

    Oct1

    9.8

    2.9

    15.6

    36.1

    3.6

    10.0

    Nov1

    10.0

    -0.9

    39.5

    108.4

    1.3

    2.1

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Annual Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Sep Oct1 Nov1

    - Department stores

    - Large discounters

    - Specialized retailers2

    2008 2009

    1. Preliminary

    2. Specialized retailers are defined as stores carrying a few (1 to 3) specialized items.

    Source: Statistics Korea

    0.5

    2.2

    -1.7

    3.7

    3.1

    0.7

    0.2

    -0.2

    -1.0

    -5.0

    -1.2

    -8.1

    1.4

    -5.0

    -6.9

    2.8

    -2.9

    2.6

    6.5

    -3.2

    4.5

    8.8

    -2.0

    8.6

    12.0

    5.5

    10.7

    5.5

    -1.1

    12.5

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Private consumption2

    (Seasonally adjusted)3

    2007 20081 20091

    1. Preliminary 2. National accounts 3. Percentage change from previous period

    Source: The Bank of Korea

    Annual

    5.1

    -

    Annual

    0.9

    -

    Q1

    4.0

    1.1

    Q2

    2.3

    -0.2

    Q3

    1.4

    0.0

    Q4

    -3.7

    -4.6

    Q1

    -4.4

    0.4

    Q2

    -0.8

    3.6

    Q3

    0.8

    1.5

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    9/67

    Economic Bulletin 9

    Consumer goods sales by type

    Source: Statistics Korea (industrial activity trend)

    Consumer goods sales

    Source: Statistics Korea (industrial activity trend)

    Private consumption

    Source: The Bank of Korea (national accounts)2-1

    2-2

    2-3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    10/67

    10 January 2010

    In December, consumer goods sales is likely to turn positive month-on-month, and continue

    to rise year-on-year, given improving advanced estimates and consumer sentiment, and a

    low base effect from the same period in the previous year.

    Domestic credit card spending increased year-on-year from the previous months 18.3

    percent to 20.0 percent, posting double-digit growth for the second consecutive month.

    Sales at department stores grew 12.4 percent year-on-year, up 6.0 percentage points from

    the previous month, continuing an upward trend. Sales at large discounters grew 3.9

    percent year-on-year from the previous months decline of 2.8 percent.

    Domestic sales of Korean cars soared 79.9 percent year-on-year, affected by the release of

    new cars, demand surge before expiration of the tax break for new car purchases, and a low

    base effect from the previous year. However, gasoline sales slightly declined.

    Stabilizing financial markets and improving consumer sentiment are also expected to

    positively affect consumption.

    Value of credit card use (y-o-y, %)

    7.3 (Jul 2009) 10.9 (Aug) 14.7 (Sep) 9.4 (Oct) 18.3 (Nov) 20.0 (Dec)

    Department store sales (y-o-y, %)

    4.0 (Jul 2009) 7.6 (Aug) 8.6 (Sep) 11.4 (Oct) 6.4 (Nov) 12.4 (Dec)

    Discount store sales (y-o-y, %)

    -6.0 (Jul 2009) -1.5 (Aug) -6.0 (Sep) 4.5 (Oct) -2.8 (Nov) 3.9 (Dec)

    Domestic sales of Korean automobiles (y-o-y, %)

    10.8 (Jul 2009) 13.0 (Aug) 76.0 (Sep) 23.8 (Oct) 83.6 (Nov) 79.9 (Dec)

    Domestic sales of gasoline (y-o-y, %)

    15.8 (Jul 2009) 4.0 (Aug) -0.3 (Sep) 20.7 (Oct) -3.0 (Nov) -4.4 (Dec)

    Source: Ministry of Knowledge EconomyThe Credit Finance Association

    Korea Automobile Manufacturers Association

    Korea National Oil Corporation

    Ministry of Strategy and Finance (for December data)

    Consumer prices (y-o-y, %)

    1.6 (Jul 2009) 2.2 (Aug) 2.2 (Sep) 2.0 (Oct) 2.4 (Nov) 2.8 (Dec)

    The won/dollar exchange rate (monthly average)1,264 (Jul 2009) 1,238 (Aug) 1,219 (Sep) 1,175 (Oct) 1,164 (Nov) 1,166 (Dec)

    KOSPI (monthly average)

    1,460 (Jul 2009) 1,579 (Aug) 1,659 (Sep) 1,631 (Oct) 1,583 (Nov) 1,647 (Dec)

    Consumer Sentiment Index (CSI)

    109 (Jul 2009) 114 (Aug) 114 (Sep) 117 (Oct) 113 (Nov) 113 (Dec)

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    11/67

    Economic Bulletin 11

    Domestic automobile sales

    Source: Korea Automobile Manufacturers Association (monthly automobile industry trend)

    Department store and discount store sales (current value)

    Source: Ministry of Knowledge Economy (monthly retail sales)2-4

    2-5

    2-6 Consumer sentiment index

    Source: The Bank of Korea

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    12/67

    12 January 2010

    3. Facility investment

    Facility investment (preliminary GDP ) in the third quarter posted a quarter-on-quarter

    increase of 10.4 percent, and a year-on-year loss of 7.4 percent.

    Facility investment in November rose 10.3 percent year-on-year, as machinery investment, in

    particular that in semi-conductor equipment, rapidly improved, and transportationequipment investment, in particular automobile investment, continued to increase.

    Machinery investment increased 7.4 percent year-on-year, the second fastest increase since

    November 2007 when it rose 7.9 percent, approaching the pre-crisis level.

    Facility investment in December is projected to stay on an upward track, given growing

    corporate investment confidence and improving leading indicators such as rising domestic

    machinery orders and increasing facility investment adjustment pressure.

    Machinery investment index

    109.7 (Sep 2008) 99.2 (Oct) 83.1 (Jan 2009) 90.1 (Aug) 107.8 (Nov)

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Facility investment2

    (Seasonally adjusted)3

    - Machinery

    - Transportation equipment

    1. Preliminary 2. National accounts 3. Percentage change from previous period

    Source: The Bank of Korea

    2007 20081 20091

    Annual

    9.3

    -

    9.2

    9.6

    Annual

    -2.0

    -

    -2.7

    0.4

    Q1

    1.5

    -0.4

    -1.2

    12.2

    Q2

    1.1

    0.4

    -0.1

    5.1

    Q3

    4.3

    0.2

    6.5

    -3.6

    Q4

    -14.0

    -14.2

    -15.3

    -9.9

    Q1

    -23.5

    -11.2

    -24.0

    -21.8

    Q2

    -15.9

    10.1

    -19.6

    -3.2

    Q3

    -7.4

    10.4

    -15.1

    21.8

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Facility investment

    (Seasonally adjusted)2

    - Machinery

    - Transportation equipment

    Domestic machinery orders

    - Public

    - Private

    Facility investmentadjustment pressure3

    1. Preliminary

    2. Percentage change from previous period3. Production growth rate minus production capacity growth rate in the manufacturing sector (%p)

    Sources: Statistics Korea

    2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    8.2

    -

    7.5

    11.3

    20.6

    -11.4

    24.5

    1.7

    Annual

    -4.3

    -

    -5.7

    1.5

    -5.5

    4.9

    -6.2

    -2.2

    Q4

    -13.4

    -9.3

    -14.5

    -9.0

    -47.3

    -3.5

    -53.9

    -15.6

    Q1

    -17.7

    -11.6

    -21.9

    0.4

    -33.8

    150.5

    -42.9

    -18.9

    Q2

    -13.4

    6.6

    -19.5

    11.3

    -14.1

    30.9

    -18.5

    -8.5

    Q3

    -10.1

    4.2

    -17.2

    19.6

    6.5

    281.3

    -12.4

    1.6

    Sep

    5.0

    17.9

    -6.0

    54.4

    31.9

    129.5

    25.5

    8.3

    Oct1

    0.5

    -5.6

    0.6

    0.0

    3.0

    -75.7

    26.9

    -3.0

    Nov1

    10.3

    7.0

    7.4

    21.1

    56.6

    108.8

    46.4

    15.1

    Source: The Bank of Korea

    Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan

    Business survey indices (base=100) for

    95 100 96 98 103manufacturing facility investment projections

    2009 2010

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    13/67

    Economic Bulletin 13

    Machinery orders and estimated facility investment (3-month average)

    Source: Statistics Korea (industrial activity trend)

    Machinery imports

    Source: Korea International Trade Association (KITA)

    Facility investment by type

    Source: The Bank of Korea (national accounts)3-1

    3-2

    3-3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    14/67

    14 January 2010

    4. Construction investment

    Construction investment (preliminary GDP ) in the third quarter rose 2.7 percent year-on-

    year, and declined 2.0 percent quarter-on-quarter.

    Construction completed (current value ) in November rose 4.2 percent year-on-year, as

    construction completed in the private sector improved along with the public sector, for the

    first time in nine months since February 2009, landing at a 3.4 percent increase year-on-year.

    Both building construction and civil engineering works climbed by 0.5 percent and 9.8

    percent, respectively.

    Construction investment is projected to slightly improve in December, given a rise in leading

    indicators such as construction orders and building permit area. Construction orders in the

    private sector, for the first time since December 2007, advanced for three consecutive

    months from a year earlier.

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Construction investment2

    (Seasonally adjusted)3

    - Building construction

    - Civil engineering works

    1. Preliminary

    2. National accounts

    3. Percentage change from previous period

    Source: The Bank of Korea

    2007 20081 20091

    Annual

    1.4

    -

    -0.0

    3.8

    Annual

    -2.1

    -

    -4.3

    1.3

    Q1

    -1.9

    -2.5

    -1.2

    -3.2

    Q2

    -0.3

    -0.3

    -0.1

    -0.7

    Q3

    0.2

    0.1

    -0.1

    0.7

    Q4

    -5.6

    -3.0

    -14.3

    5.7

    Q1

    1.6

    5.2

    -11.1

    24.9

    Q2

    3.7

    1.7

    -3.5

    14.3

    Q3

    2.7

    -2.0

    -0.4

    7.7

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Construction completed

    (Seasonally adjusted)2

    - Public

    - Private

    Construction orders

    - Public

    - Private

    Building permit area

    1. Preliminary

    2. Percentage change from previous period

    Source: Statistics Korea & The Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs

    2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    6.6

    -

    8.4

    4.6

    23.6

    40.3

    16.5

    13.3

    Annual

    4.7

    -

    6.5

    1.7

    -9.0

    9.1

    -15.8

    -20.1

    Q4

    -2.2

    -6.2

    8.7

    -9.1

    -6.5

    5.0

    -15.3

    -41.9

    Q1

    4.5

    7.7

    24.4

    -5.0

    -16.5

    22.0

    -38.4

    -31.6

    Q2

    7.0

    2.2

    32.1

    -5.2

    -2.0

    186.5

    -62.4

    -32.7

    Q3

    -0.6

    -6.6

    21.7

    -11.3

    9.1

    75.6

    -10.7

    -4.6

    Sep

    7.7

    10.1

    32.2

    -4.3

    58.4

    101.1

    61.8

    31.4

    Oct1

    -5.2

    -2.9

    4.9

    -9.6

    27.2

    89.7

    16.3

    -29.5

    Nov1

    4.2

    1.2

    8.1

    3.4

    77.0

    64.6

    85.6

    14.1

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    15/67

    Economic Bulletin 15

    Leading indicators of construction investment

    Source: Statistics Korea (construction orders)

    Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (building construction permit area)

    Construction completed and housing construction

    Source: Statistics Korea (construction completed)

    Kookmin Bank (housing construction)

    Construction investment

    Source: The Bank of Korea (national accounts)4-1

    4-2

    4-3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    16/67

    16 January 2010

    5. Exports and imports

    Exports in December soared 33.7 percent year-on-year to US$36.24 billion.

    The large increase in exports is mainly attributed to a low base effect from the previous year

    and the global economy recently recovering. Daily average exports in working-day-adjusted-

    terms also rose from the previous month.

    By export category, liquid crystal devices (up 177.7% ) and semiconductors (up 125.5%)

    surged, and by regional category, exports to China (up 94.0%) and the EU (up 41.7%) greatly

    improved.

    Imports in December jumped 24.0 percent year-on-year to US$32.94 billion due to a low

    base effect and improving domestic demand. Average daily imports in working-day-

    adjusted-terms also increased from the previous month. Imports of capital goods further

    expanded, while raw material imports switched to an increase, affected by rising oil prices.

    The trade balance in December posted a surplus of US$3.30 billion, staying in the black foreleven straight months since February 2009. The annual trade balance of 2009 recorded a

    surplus of US$40.98 billion, the largest surplus ever.

    Raw materials (y-o-y, %)

    -34.7 (Q1 2009) -43.0 (Q2) -39.3 (Q3); -7.0 (Nov) 24.8 (Dec)

    Capital goods (y-o-y, %)

    -29.1 (Q1 2009) -23.6 (Q2) -13.7 (Q3); 17.8 (Nov) 29.1 (Dec)

    Consumer goods (y-o-y, %)

    -29.5 (Q1 2009) -24.4 (Q2) -20.9 (Q3); 15.3 (Nov) 7.4 (Dec)

    (US$ billion)

    Exports

    (y-o-y, %)

    Average daily exports

    Imports

    (y-o-y, %)

    Average daily imports

    2008 2009

    Annual

    422.0113.6

    1.53

    435.27

    22.0

    1.58

    Dec

    27.12-17.9

    1.13

    26.58

    -21.6

    1.11

    Q1

    74.41-25.2

    1.10

    71.45

    -32.6

    1.06

    Q2

    90.32-21.1

    1.30

    73.82

    -35.7

    1.06

    Q3

    94.77-17.6

    1.32

    84.79

    -31.0

    1.18

    Oct

    33.96-8.5

    1.48

    30.34

    -16.0

    1.32

    Nov

    34.0818.1

    1.48

    29.46

    2.1

    1.28

    Dec

    36.2433.7

    1.51

    32.94

    24.0

    1.37

    Jan-Dec

    363.77-13.8

    1.30

    322.79

    -25.8

    1.16

    Source: Korea Customs Service

    (US$ billion)

    Trade Balance

    2008 2009

    Annual

    -13.27

    Dec

    0.32

    Q1

    2.99

    Q2

    16.50

    Q3

    9.98

    Oct

    3.62

    Nov

    4.62

    Dec

    3.30

    Jan-Dec

    40.98

    Source: Korea Customs Service

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    17/67

    Economic Bulletin 17

    Imports (customs clearance basis)

    Source: Korea Customs Service & Ministry of Knowledge Economy (export and import trend)

    Trade balance

    Source: Korea Customs Service & Ministry of Knowledge Economy (export and import trend)

    Exports (customs clearance basis)

    Source: Korea Customs Service & Ministry of Knowledge Economy (export and import trend)

    5-1

    5-2

    5-3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    18/67

    18 January 2010

    6. Mining and manufacturing production

    Mining and manufacturing production rose 1.4 percent month-on-month in November,

    thanks to an export increase and a low base effect from the previous month due to Chuseok

    holidays, while year-on-year it surged 17.8 percent

    By business category, semiconductors and parts (up 56.3%), chemical products (up 28.0%),

    and automobiles (up 14.9% ) posted an increase year-on-year, whereas beverages (down

    9.6%) and metalworks (down 2.5%) decreased.

    Shipments soared 2.0 percent month-on-month, or 15.3 percent year-on-year, thanks to

    brisk shipments of semiconductors and parts, while the level of inventory decelerated a drop

    from the previous months 16.2 percent to 14.5 percent.

    By business category, the shipments of semiconductors and parts (up 47.1%) and

    automobiles (up 18.6%) rose year-on-year, while those of refined petroleum products (down

    2.4%) and transportation equipment (down 2.9% ) declined. The inventories of automobiles

    (down 30.9% ), primary metals (down 21.4% ), and chemical products (down 21.1% ) went

    down.

    The average operation ratio of the manufacturing sector registered 77.3 percent, staying at

    the same level as the previous month.

    Mining and manufacturing production in December is projected to continue an upward track,

    as advanced estimates, in particular electricity sales and exports, showed an improvement.

    Production (q-o-q, m-o-m)

    (y-o-y)

    - Manufacturing

    Heavy chemical industry

    Light industry

    Shipment

    - Domestic demand

    - Exports

    Inventory3

    Average operation ratio (%)

    Production capacity

    1. Preliminary 2. Including mining, manufacturing, electricity and gas industry 3. End-period

    Source: Statistics Korea

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Mining andmanufacturingactivity2

    Manufacturingactivity

    20092008

    Annual

    -

    3.0

    3.0

    4.1

    -2.2

    2.4

    -0.7

    7.1

    7.3

    77.2

    5.2

    Q3

    -1.9

    5.6

    5.6

    6.8

    0.0

    5.3

    1.7

    10.3

    17.3

    78.3

    5.3

    Nov

    -10.1

    -13.8

    -14.5

    -15.0

    -12.2

    -13.2

    -14.0

    -11.9

    16.1

    68.4

    3.4

    Q2

    11.4

    -6.2

    -6.6

    -6.2

    -8.8

    -5.8

    -6.6

    -4.7

    -16.7

    73.7

    1.9

    Q3

    7.2

    4.2

    4.4

    5.6

    -1.8

    2.1

    3.1

    0.8

    -13.9

    78.9

    2.8

    Sep

    5.7

    11.0

    11.5

    12.4

    6.5

    8.9

    12.4

    4.3

    -13.9

    80.2

    3.2

    Oct1

    -3.8

    0.2

    0.4

    1.9

    -7.1

    -0.6

    -1.0

    -0.1

    -16.2

    77.3

    3.4

    Nov1

    1.4

    17.8

    18.6

    21.5

    4.4

    15.3

    13.5

    17.7

    -14.5

    77.3

    3.5

    Industrial electricity sales (thousand GWh)

    18.3 (Sep 2009) 17.7 (Oct) 18.1 (Nov) 19.0 (Dec)1

    Exports (US$ billion)

    32.0 (Jul 2009) 28.9 (Aug) 34.1 (Sep) 34.0 (Oct) 34.1 (Nov) 36.2 (Dec)

    1. Estimate

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    19/67

    Economic Bulletin 19

    Inventory

    Source: Statistics Korea (industrial activity trend)

    Average manufacturing operation ratio

    Source: Statistics Korea (industrial activity trend)

    Industrial production

    Source: Statistics Korea (industrial activity trend)6-1

    6-2

    6-3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    20/67

    20 January 2010

    7. Service sector activity

    Service activity in November 2009 decreased 1.2 percent from the previous month partly due

    to the H1N1 flu pandemic. From a year earlier, however, service output expanded 3.3

    percent.

    By business category, real estate & renting services (up 15.9%), healthcare & social welfare

    services (up 11.6%) and wholesale & retail sales (up 5.4%) led the year-on-year increase in

    the service sector.

    Meanwhile, entertainment, cultural & sports services (down 6.9% ) and professional,

    scientific & technical activities (down 3.9%) declined from a year earlier.

    Amid robust advanced indicators including credit card spending, service activity in

    December 2009 is expected to reverse its course to post a month-on-month increase, mainly

    affected by the subdued H1N1 flu pandemic and rising stock prices.

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year)

    Annual Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Sep Oct1 Nov1

    Service activity index

    - Wholesale & retail

    - Transportation services

    - Hotels & restaurants

    - Information & communication services

    - Financial & insurance services

    - Real estate & renting

    - Professional, scientific & technical services

    - Business services

    - Educational services

    - Healthcare & social welfare services

    - Entertainment, cultural & sports services

    - Membership organizations

    - Sewerage & waste management

    Weight2008 2009

    100

    22.0

    9.0

    7.8

    8.4

    15.3

    6.3

    4.8

    2.9

    10.8

    6.0

    2.9

    3.8

    0.4

    3.4

    1.4

    4.3

    0.7

    3.5

    9.7

    -2.1

    2.0

    4.6

    1.8

    6.3

    2.2

    0.1

    5.8

    3.2

    3.6

    4.3

    1.7

    3.4

    9.6

    -8.4

    1.8

    3.2

    -0.5

    6.1

    1.7

    -1.4

    3.9

    -0.4

    -4.6

    -3.2

    -3.0

    -0.2

    4.5

    -7.5

    0.9

    0.1

    2.3

    6.5

    4.3

    -1.0

    4.0

    -0.4

    -4.0

    -10.8

    -2.4

    -1.9

    6.6

    -3.1

    -1.9

    -4.8

    3.7

    8.6

    1.5

    -3.4

    0.5

    1.6

    -2.2

    -9.5

    -0.3

    0.9

    9.8

    1.5

    3.2

    -6.6

    6.9

    8.1

    0.9

    -5.0

    8.8

    2.2

    0.3

    -4.1

    -2.2

    1.5

    8.7

    9.3

    0.1

    -1.1

    -2.6

    9.8

    0.1

    -1.7

    5.5

    4.4

    3.3

    0.4

    0.0

    3.2

    9.4

    9.7

    3.0

    -1.2

    -0.3

    11.4

    4.7

    1.9

    9.6

    3.3

    5.4

    2.6

    -2.0

    1.4

    4.5

    15.9

    -3.9

    -2.4

    0.2

    11.6

    -6.9

    -3.5

    0.3

    1.3

    1.9

    -2.5

    -2.7

    1.5

    4.0

    14.3

    -2.9

    -0.5

    -7.0

    11.4

    -6.6

    -0.8

    -3.5

    1. Preliminary

    Source: Statistics Korea

    Value of credit card use (y-o-y, %)

    10.9 (Aug 2009) 14.7 (Sep) 9.4 (Oct) 18.3 (Nov) 20 (Dec)1

    KOSPI (monthly average)

    1,630 (Oct 2009) 1,583 (Nov) 1,647 (Dec)

    1. Estimate

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    21/67

    Economic Bulletin 21

    November 2009 service industry by business

    Source: Statistics Korea (service industry activity trend)

    Wholesale and retail sales

    Source: Statistics Korea (service industry activity trend)

    Service industry

    Source: Statistics Korea (service industry activity trend)7-1

    7-2

    7-3

    Totalin

    dex

    Who

    lesal

    e&retail

    Tran

    sportatio

    n

    Hotels

    &re

    staurants

    Informa

    tion&

    comm

    unica

    tions

    Real

    estate

    &renting

    Professional,s

    cientifi

    c&

    technic

    alservice

    s

    Busin

    essfacilit

    ymanag

    ement&

    busin

    esssupport

    servi

    ces

    Education

    alservi

    ces

    Healthc

    are&

    socialw

    elfa

    re

    servi

    ces

    Ente

    rtainm

    ent,

    cultu

    ral&

    sports

    servi

    ces

    Membe

    rship

    organiz

    atio

    ns,repair

    &

    othe

    rpersonals

    ervic

    es

    Sewe

    rage

    ,waste

    mana

    geme

    nt,m

    aterials

    recovery&

    remedia

    tiona

    ctivities

    Finan

    cial&

    insuran

    ceservi

    ces

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    22/67

    22 January 2010

    8. Employment

    The number of workers on payroll in November 2009 declined by 10,000 from a year earlier

    as hiring in the agriculture, forestry & fishery dropped significantly.

    Employment in the manufacturing sector continued to decrease mainly due to sluggishexports. The pace of decline in the sector, however, decelerated to 43,000. Hiring in the

    construction sector stayed on a downward track with a 115,000 decrease as employment in

    the private sector remained weak. Employment in the service sector soared by 294,000

    driven by the governments job creation policies. Meanwhile, the number of employed in the

    agriculture, forestry & fishery plunged 151,000 as fall cultivation declined while the

    temperature dropped.

    By status of workers, non-wage workers including self-employed workers plummeted by

    424,000 from a year earlier. In the mean time, wage workers rose by 413,000 led by an

    increase of 492,000 in regular workers and 186,000 in temporary workers, although the

    number of daily workers shrank by 264,000.

    The employment rate stood at 59.1 percent, down 0.8 percentage points compared to the

    same month of the previous year. The unemployment rate rose 0.2 percentage points year-

    on-year to 3.3 percent, while that of youths aged 15 to 29 was up 1.5 percentage points from

    a year earlier to 7.6 percent.

    Unemployment rate (%)

    Employment rate (%)

    (Change from same period in previous year, thousand)

    20092008

    Annual

    3.2

    59.5

    Nov

    3.1

    59.9

    Q1

    3.4

    58.5

    Q2

    3.1

    60.3

    Q3

    3.1

    59.9

    Q4

    3.1

    59.4

    Q1

    3.8

    57.4

    Q2

    3.8

    59.3

    Q3

    3.6

    59.1

    Oct

    3.2

    59.3

    Nov

    3.3

    59.1

    Source: Statistics Korea

    Employment growth

    - Manufacturing

    - Construction

    - Services

    - Agriculture, forestry & fishery

    - Wage workers

    Regular workers

    Temporary workers

    Daily workers

    - Non-wage workers

    Self-employed workers

    (Change from same period in previous year, thousand)

    20092008

    Annual

    145

    -52

    -37

    263

    -37

    236

    386

    -93

    -57

    -92

    -79

    Nov

    78

    -86

    -32

    150

    42

    159

    318

    -103

    -56

    -81

    -83

    Q1

    209

    -18

    -22

    307

    -63

    312

    435

    -98

    -25

    -102

    -79

    Q2

    173

    -34

    -46

    300

    -54

    289

    448

    -96

    -63

    -115

    -67

    Q3

    141

    -52

    -40

    262

    -38

    208

    347

    -83

    -56

    -66

    -76

    Q4

    54

    -103

    -41

    187

    8

    137

    316

    -94

    -85

    -83

    -95

    Q1

    -146

    -163

    -43

    47

    14

    73

    318

    -136

    -108

    -220

    -197

    Q2

    -134

    -151

    -113

    155

    -25

    175

    313

    -5

    -133

    -309

    -286

    Q3

    -1

    -143

    -103

    269

    -25

    356

    386

    125

    -155

    -357

    -276

    Oct

    10

    -87

    -147

    269

    -29

    376

    490

    136

    -250

    -367

    -266

    Nov

    -10

    -43

    -115

    294

    -151

    413

    492

    186

    -264

    -424

    -307

    Source: Statistics Korea

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    23/67

    Economic Bulletin 23

    Share of employed by industry

    Source: Statistics Korea (service industry activity trend)

    Number of employed and employment growth

    Source: Statistics Korea (service industry activity trend)8-1

    8-2

    8-3 Unemployment rate and number of unemployed

    Source: Statistics Korea (service industry activity trend)

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    24/67

    24 January 2010

    9. Financial market

    9.1 Stock market

    The Korean stock market in December 2009 was up amid global market rallies andexpectations over an economic recovery.

    Investor sentiment in the market was boosted as Koreas GDP in the third quarter expanded

    3.2 percent from the previous quarter posting the highest quarter-on-quarter growth in 90

    months while the IMF upgraded its forecasts for Koreas economic growth for 2009 and 2010

    to 0.25 percent and 4.5 percent, respectively, from initial estimates of minus 1 percent and

    3.6 percent.

    Despite liquidity problems of Kumho Asiana Group, the Korean stock market rallies

    continued until the end of the year, mainly affected by a Korean consortiums gaining of the

    nuclear-plant contract with the United Arab Emirate (UAE).

    Foreign investors led domestic stock market rallies by continuing their net-buying of Korean

    shares since July, although the market was in a wait-and-see mode toward the end of the

    year.

    9.2 Exchange rate

    The won/dollar exchange rate in December rose 1.7 won from 1,162.9 won at the end of

    November to wrap up the month at 1,164.5 won.

    The exchange rate dropped to 1,153 won, the lowest this year, on December 4 as did on

    November 18, as fear eased over Dubais debt default crisis. It, thereafter, turned to anincrease as investors appetite for safe assets grew as downgrades of Greeces sovereign

    credit rating fueled concerns over credit risks in the eurozone.

    The won/yen exchange rate fell to the 1,200 won range with worries about deflation in

    Japan.

    1. Appreciation from the end of the previous year (%); the exchange rate is based on the closing price at 3:00 p.m., local time.

    (End-period)

    Dec Dec Dec Nov Dec Change1

    Won/Dollar 929.8 936.1 1,259.5 1,162.8 1,164.5 8.2

    Won/100Yen 783.4 828.6 1,396.8 1,348.8 1,264.5 10.5

    Nov 2009 Dec 2009 Change1 Nov 2009 Dec 2009 Change1

    Stock price index

    Market capitalization

    Average daily trade valueForeign stock ownership

    1. Change from the previous month

    2006 2007 2008 2009

    KOSPI KOSDAQ

    (End-period, point, trillion won)

    1,555.6

    818.5

    4.032.7

    1,682.8

    887.3

    4.532.7

    127.2 (8.2%)

    68.8 (8.4%)

    0.5 (12.5%)0.0 (0.0%)

    464.3

    75.4

    1.67.3

    513.1

    85.2

    2.07.4

    48.8 (10.5%)

    9.8 (13.0%)

    0.4 (25.0%)0.1 (5.8%)

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    25/67

    Economic Bulletin 25

    Foreign exchange rate (month-end)

    Stock prices9-1

    9-2

    9-3 Recent foreign exchange rate

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    26/67

    26 January 2010

    9.3 Bond market

    Treasury bond yields were up in December due to less demand for safe assets with global

    stock market rallies and expectations over an economic rebound.

    Despite the Bank of Koreas decision to keep its policy rate unchanged, the yieldsaccelerated the growth pace, as foreign investors made a net selling of KTB futures amid an

    improvement of economic indicators such as industrial activities.

    9.4 Money supply & money market

    The M2 (monthly average) in October expanded 9.9 percent from a year earlier excluding

    cash management accounts (CMAs), which were included in M2 since July 2009. The year-

    on-year M2 growth was higher than the previous months 9.5 percent, as financial

    institutions are likely to have hiked their deposit rates to attract matured deposits.

    Bank deposits in November increased driven by time deposits which expanded at a faster

    pace with the inflow of massive corporate funds fueled by deposit rate hikes.

    Asset management company (AMC) deposits shifted to an increase as financial institutions

    short-term idle money flowed into the deposits while money withdrawals from equity funds

    declined.

    Dec Dec Dec Dec Oct Nov Dec Change1

    Call rate (1 day) 3.76 4.60 5.02 3.02 2.01 2.01 2.01 0

    CD (91 days) 4.09 4.86 5.82 3.93 2.79 2.79 2.88 9

    Treasury bonds (3 yrs) 5.08 4.92 5.74 3.41 4.44 4.10 4.44 34

    Corporate bonds (3 yrs) 5.52 5.29 6.77 7.72 5.58 5.21 5.56 35

    Treasury bonds (5 yrs) 5.36 5.00 5.78 3.77 4.94 4.61 4.98 37

    (End-period)

    1. Basis point changes in December 2009 from the previous month

    20092008200720062005

    Bank deposits

    AMC deposits

    (Monthly change, end-period, trillion won)

    1. Balance at end November 2009, trillion won

    2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    59.6

    61.8

    Nov

    11.2

    14.3

    Annual

    104.3

    63.0

    Nov

    9.4

    2.8

    Sep

    16.5

    -18.3

    Oct

    -6.8

    -7.3

    Nov

    1.5

    4.4

    Nov1

    1,015.8

    342.9

    M1+2

    M2

    Lf3

    (Percentage change from same period in previous year, average)

    1. Balance at end October 2009, trillion won

    2. M1 excluding corporate MMFs and individual MMFs while including CMAs

    3. Liquidity aggregates of financial institutions (mostly identical with M3)

    4. Balance at end September 2009, trillion won

    2009

    Annual

    -5.2

    11.2

    10.2

    2007 2008

    Annual

    -1.8

    14.3

    11.9

    Q1

    -12.4

    13.3

    11.6

    Q4

    5.0

    13.8

    11.2

    Q2

    -0.1

    15.3

    12.8

    Q3

    2.1

    14.7

    12.1

    Oct

    4.2

    14.2

    11.9

    Q1

    10.8

    11.5

    8.8

    Q2

    17.6

    10.1

    7.3

    Aug

    18.5

    9.5

    7.6

    Oct

    19.6

    9.9

    Lower7

    Oct1

    371.5

    1,543.4

    1,965.34

    Sep

    19.5

    9.5

    7.3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    27/67

    Economic Bulletin 27

    Total money supply

    Source: The Bank of Korea

    Interest rates

    Source: The Bank of Korea9-4

    9-5

    9-6 Share of deposits by financial sector (M3 as of year-end)

    Source: The Bank of Korea

    * Retail finance: Mutual savings banks & National Credit Union Federation of Korea, Others: Investment banks, post office savings, etc.

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    28/67

    28 January 2010

    10. Balance of payments

    Koreas current account recorded a US$4.28 billion surplus in November.

    The goods account surplus exceeded US$5 billion for three consecutive months since

    September 2009 as the trade balance continued to post a surplus.

    The surplus expanded to US$5.84 billion from US$5.68 billion a month earlier. The service

    account deficit increased to US$1.66 billion from the previous months US$1.31 billion, as

    deficits swelled in the travel balance and fee payments such as payments for patent rights.

    The income account surplus reduced to US$390 million from US$560 million of the previous

    month as dividend and interest payments increased.

    The current transfer account deficit was up to US$290 million from the previous months

    US$160 million with increased outward remittance.

    The capital and financial account in November posted a net inflow of US$1.54 billion.

    The direct investment account expanded the net outflow to register US$2.84 billion from the

    previous months deficit of US$510 million as outbound foreign direct investment (FDI) by

    locals increased while inward FDI by foreigners decreased.

    The portfolio investment account decreased the net inflow to record US$3.39 billion fromUS$6.13 billion a month earlier as foreign investment in the Korean bond market declined.

    The financial derivatives account turned to a net inflow of US$850 million from a net outflow

    of US$570 million in the previous month as payments related to overseas financial

    derivative transactions decreased.

    The other investment account reversed its course to post a surplus of US$190 million after

    recording a deficit of US$3.48 billion a month earlier as financial institutions collected short-

    term foreign currency-denominated lending from overseas.

    The current account is likely to record a surplus of around US$2 billion in December as the

    trade balance posted a surplus of US$3.30 billion.

    Current account

    - Goods balance

    - Service balance

    - Income balance

    - Current transfers

    (US$ billion)

    20092008

    Capital & financial account balance (US$ billion)

    -1.44 (Q1 2009) 8.68 (Q2) 14.40 (Q3); 1.58 (Oct) 1.54 (Nov)

    Annual

    -5.78

    5.67

    -16.67

    5.90

    -0.67

    Q1

    -4.87

    -1.38

    -4.94

    1.98

    -0.53

    Q2

    -0.41

    5.53

    -4.46

    -0.52

    -0.96

    Q3

    -8.33

    -3.23

    -5.84

    1.50

    -0.76

    Q4

    7.83

    4.75

    -1.44

    2.94

    1.58

    Q1

    8.62

    8.31

    -1.93

    0.92

    1.31

    Q2

    13.10

    17.58

    -4.17

    0.29

    -0.60

    Q3

    10.40

    14.70

    -5.33

    1.69

    -0.66

    Oct

    4.76

    5.68

    -1.31

    0.56

    -0.16

    Nov

    4.28

    5.84

    -1.66

    0.39

    -0.29

    Jan-Nov

    41.15

    52.11

    -14.40

    3.86

    -0.41

    Source: The Bank of Korea

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    29/67

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    30/67

    11. Prices and international commodity prices

    11.1 Prices

    Consumer prices in December 2009 increased 0.4 percent month-on-month while rising 2.8percent year-on-year.

    The overall price index was up 0.4 percent month-on-month as prices for agricultural,livestock and fishery products gained strength and a price adjustment increased personalservice charges in the year-end. Prices of agricultural, livestock and fishery products rose 2.8percent from the previous month due to decreased supply affected by cold wave and higherstorage cost.

    Prices of agricultural, livestock & fishery products in December 2009 (m-o-m, %)Rice (-1.9), radish (0.7), Chinese cabbage (-6.4), cucumber (50.3), lettuce (36.3), mandarin orange (-11.1),

    Korean beef (1.5), pork (3.1), mackerel (5.6), scabbard fish (4.1), Alaska pollack (3.1)

    Despite stabilized international oil prices, prices of oil products increased 0.2 percent from a monthearlier affected by LPG price increases in December.

    Prices of oil products in December 2009 (m-o-m, %)Gasoline (-0.5), diesel (-0.7), kerosene (-0.3), LPG for automobiles (5.4), LPG for kitchen use (4.4)

    Public utility charges remained at a similar level to the previous month as an increase in local publicutility charges was offset by falling medical service fees followed by expanded medical insurancecoverage.

    Due to higher expenses for dining-out affected by beef price increases and strong demand for year-end parties on top of a peak price tariff introduced in the tourism and lodging industry during thehigh season, personal service charges rose 0.3 percent month-on-month.

    Core consumer prices, which exclude the prices of oil and agricultural products, rose by 2.2 percentyear-on-year. Consumer prices for basic necessities, a barometer of perceived consumer prices, wereup 3.3 percent compared to the same month of the previous year.

    Consumer price inflation in major sectors

    Publicutility

    Industrialproducts

    Oilproducts

    TotalAgricultural,

    livestock & fisheryproducts

    Housingrents

    Personalservices

    Month-on-Month (%)

    Contribution (%p)

    Year-on-Year (%)

    Contribution (%p)

    0.4

    0.35

    2.8

    2.80

    2.8

    0.23

    3.4

    0.28

    0.1

    0.03

    4.6

    1.42

    0.2

    0.01

    11.9

    0.63

    0.2

    0.02

    1.2

    0.11

    0.0

    0.00

    1.8

    0.29

    0.3

    0.09

    2.0

    0.71

    30 January 2010

    Source: Statistics Korea

    Consumer price inflation

    Source: Statistics Korea

    2008 2009

    Month-on-Month (%)

    Year-on-Year (%)

    Core consumer prices (y-o-y)

    (m-o-m)

    Consumer prices for basicnecessities (y-o-y)

    Dec

    0.0

    4.1

    5.6

    0.5

    3.0

    Jan

    0.1

    3.7

    5.2

    0.2

    2.8

    Feb

    0.7

    4.1

    5.2

    0.4

    3.3

    Mar

    0.7

    3.9

    4.5

    0.4

    3.1

    Apr

    0.3

    3.6

    4.2

    0.2

    3.0

    May

    0.0

    2.7

    3.9

    0.2

    1.8

    Jun

    -0.1

    2.0

    3.5

    0.1

    0.5

    Jul

    0.4

    1.6

    3.2

    0.2

    0.4

    Aug

    0.4

    2.2

    3.1

    0.1

    1.3

    Sep

    0.1

    2.2

    2.7

    0.1

    1.7

    Oct

    -0.3

    2.0

    2.6

    0.1

    1.5

    Nov

    0.2

    2.4

    2.5

    0.2

    2.3

    Dec

    0.4

    2.8

    2.2

    0.1

    3.3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    31/67

    Economic Bulletin 31

    Contribution to consumer price inflation

    Source: Statistics Korea (consumer price trend)

    Prices

    Source: Statistics Korea (consumer prices, core inflation) & The Bank of Korea (producer prices)

    11-1

    11-2

    11-3

    Consumer price inflation

    Source: Statistics Korea (consumer price trend)

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    32/67

    32 January 2010

    11.2. International oil and commodity prices

    Before rising to the high-US$70s affected by strong demand for heating oil in the month-end,

    international oil prices in December tumbled to remain around US$70 a barrel as the US

    dollar gained strength. The monthly average oil prices turned to a fall for the first time in three

    months.

    Despite the wons deppreciation, domestic prices of oil products inched down month-on-

    month as weak international oil product prices by mid-December were reflected with the

    time lag.

    Prices of non-ferrous metals in December continued to rise while international prices of grain

    rose due to Chinas increased demand.

    Prices of non-ferrous metals increased with expectations of economic recovery in 2010

    rather than fundamental factors including demand and supply conditions. Aluminum prices

    grew at double digit with the spreading recognition that it remained relatively undervalued

    compared to other non-ferrous metals.

    Corn and soybean prices rose due to deteriorating weather conditions and increasing

    demand from China while the wheat price increase is limited by favorable supply and

    demand dynamics.

    Prices of non-ferrous metals and grain in December 2009 (m-o-m, %)

    Corn (3.0), wheat (0.2), soybean (2.4), bronze (4.8), aluminum (11.7), nickel (0.6), zinc (8.6), lead (1.2), tin (4.9)

    (Won/liter, period average)

    Annual Annual Annual Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Gasoline prices 1,526 1,692 1,601 1,607 1,639 1,670 1,681 1,627 1,655 1,646

    Diesel prices 1,273 1,614 1,397 1,389 1,428 1,447 1,453 1,409 1,452 1,441

    2007 2008 2009

    Source: Korea National Oil Corporation

    Record high oil prices (spot prices, US$/barrel)

    Dubai crude: 141 (Jul 4, 2008), Brent crude: 145 (Jul 3), WTI crude: 146 (Jul 14)

    (US$/barrel, period average)

    Dubai crude

    Brent crude

    WTI crude

    2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    68.4

    72.8

    72.3

    Annual

    94.3

    97.5

    99.9

    Annual

    61.9

    61.7

    61.9

    Jun

    69.4

    68.6

    69.7

    Jul

    65.0

    64.6

    64.2

    Aug

    71.4

    72.9

    71.1

    Sep

    67.7

    67.5

    69.4

    Oct

    73.2

    72.8

    75.8

    Nov

    77.7

    76.7

    78.1

    Dec

    75.5

    74.5

    74.5

    Source: KOREAPDS

    (Period average)Reuters index*

    Annual Annual Annual Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    2,400 2,536 2,079 2,117 2,082 2,159 2,147 2,197 2,243 2,294

    200920082007

    * A weighted average index of 17 major commodities Source: KOREAPDS

    Reuters index*

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    33/67

    Economic Bulletin 33

    International oil prices (Dubai crude) and import prices

    Source: Korea National Oil Corporation & Korea Customs Service

    International oil prices

    Source: Korea National Oil Corporation11-4

    11-5

    11-6 International commodity prices

    Source: Bloomberg (CRB) & The Bank of Korea (Reuters index)

    * CRB demonstrates futures price index of 21 commodities listed on the US Commodity Transaction Market, including beans and other crops, crude oil and jewelry.

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    34/67

    34 January 2010

    12. Real estate market

    12.1 Housing market

    In December 2009, nationwide apartment sales prices were up 0.2 percent month-on-month,

    decelerating the pace of increase for three straight months. Compared with the end of 2008,apartment prices rose 1.6 percent. Apartment sales prices in the Seoul metropolitan areawere down for the first time since March 2009 as property transactions in major areas suchas Gangnam (down 0.1%), Seocho (down 0.1%), and Gwacheon (down 0.7%) continued tocontract. On the other hand, apartment sales prices in other cities, especially Busan (up0.8%) and Daejeon (up 0.7%), increased relatively significantly.

    The rental prices have slowed down the growth pace for the third month in a row with thebeginning of the winter low season, by rising 0.3 percent from the previous month. From theend of 2008, rental prices were up 4.5 percent. The rental prices in Gangnam (up 0.8%),Seocho (up 1.2%), and Songpa (up 0.7%) remained strong.

    Apartment sales transactions in November decreased 6.6 percent from 87,329 a monthearlier to post 81,589. The transactions were up 52.1 percent from a year earlier and down8.3 percent compared with the monthly average recorded in the same month for the past 3years.

    Source: Korea Land Corporation

    (Monthly average, thousand)Apartment sales transactions

    Nationwide

    2006 2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    94

    Nov

    152

    Annual

    84

    Nov

    80

    Annual

    74

    Nov

    54

    Dec

    57

    Jan

    49

    Feb

    60

    Mar

    79

    Apr

    76

    May

    72

    Jun

    81

    Jul

    91

    Aug

    81

    Sep

    90

    Oct

    87

    Nov

    82

    (Percentage change from previous period)Nationwide apartment sales prices

    Nationwide

    SeoulGangnam2

    Gangbuk3

    Seoul metropolitan area

    5 metropolitan cities

    Other cities

    1. Weekly trends 2. Upscale area of southern Seoul 3. Northern Seoul Source: Kookmin Bank

    2006 2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    13.8

    24.127.6

    19.0

    24.6

    2.1

    3.0

    Annual

    2.1

    3.60.5

    8.3

    4.0

    -0.6

    0.3

    Annual

    2.3

    3.2-1.9

    9.4

    2.9

    1.0

    2.3

    Dec

    -0.5

    -1.6-2.0

    -1.3

    -1.4

    -0.3

    -0.3

    Annual

    1.6

    2.63.9

    0.9

    0.7

    2.8

    2.2

    Q1

    -1.2

    -1.3-1.1

    -1.7

    -1.8

    -0.7

    -0.3

    Q2

    0.4

    1.01.7

    0.2

    0.5

    0.3

    0.3

    Q3

    1.5

    2.63.1

    2.0

    1.8

    1.3

    0.8

    Q4

    0.9

    0.30.2

    0.4

    0.2

    1.9

    1.5

    Oct

    0.4

    0.30.3

    0.4

    0.3

    0.6

    0.5

    Nov

    0.3

    0.00.0

    0.1

    0.0

    0.8

    0.6

    Dec

    0.2

    0.00.0

    0.0

    -0.1

    0.5

    0.4

    Dec211

    0.03

    0.000.00

    0.00

    -0.02

    0.09

    0.08

    Dec71

    0.05

    -0.01-0.01

    -0.01

    -0.03

    0.19

    0.08

    Dec141

    0.03

    -0.01-0.01

    0.00

    -0.03

    0.08

    0.12

    Dec281

    0.03

    0.010.04

    -0.02

    -0.01

    0.10

    0.05

    (Percentage change from previous period)Nationwide apartment rental prices

    Nationwide

    Seoul

    Gangnam2

    Gangbuk3

    Seoul metropolitan area

    5 metropolitan cities

    Other cities

    1. Weekly trends 2. Upscale area of southern Seoul 3. Northern Seoul Source: Kookmin Bank

    2006 2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    7.6

    11.5

    11.3

    11.8

    11.7

    3.0

    4.1

    Annual

    1.9

    2.2

    0.5

    4.6

    2.1

    1.1

    2.2

    Annual

    0.8

    -1.8

    -3.6

    0.5

    -0.4

    1.6

    2.6

    Dec

    -1.4

    -2.7

    -0.9

    -2.4

    -2.2

    -0.4

    -0.5

    Annual

    4.5

    8.1

    10.4

    5.4

    5.6

    3.9

    2.9

    Q1

    -1.3

    -0.8

    -0.1

    -1.6

    -1.8

    -0.9

    -0.4

    Q2

    0.9

    1.8

    2.4

    1.0

    1.4

    0.4

    0.5

    Q3

    2.8

    4.7

    5.1

    4.2

    4.1

    1.9

    1.0

    Q4

    2.0

    2.3

    2.7

    1.9

    1.8

    2.6

    1.8

    Oct

    0.9

    1.1

    1.1

    1.1

    1.0

    0.8

    0.5

    Nov

    0.8

    0.8

    1.0

    0.6

    0.7

    1.1

    0.7

    Dec

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.2

    0.1

    0.7

    0.5

    Dec211

    0.08

    0.12

    0.18

    0.04

    0.04

    0.15

    0.11

    Dec71

    0.09

    0.14

    0.25

    0.00

    0.02

    0.21

    0.13

    Dec141

    0.09

    0.08

    0.10

    0.07

    0.04

    0.14

    0.17

    Dec281

    0.08

    0.01

    0.20

    -0.01

    0.06

    0.13

    0.09

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    35/67

    Economic Bulletin 35

    Apartment prices by region

    Source: Kookmin Bank (national housing price trend)

    Weekly apartment sales prices and monthly transaction volume

    Source: Kookmin Bank (weekly APT price trend) & Korea Land Corporation (monthly land trade trend)

    Real estate prices

    Source: Kookmin Bank (national housing price trend)12-1

    12-2

    12-3

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    36/67

    36 January 2010

    12.2 Land market

    Nationwide land prices in November rose 0.30 percent, the same level as the previous

    month, continuing the moderate recovery pace since April 2009. The accumulated increase

    rate from January to November was 0.61 percent, with land prices standing below the record

    high in October 2008 by 3.5 percent.

    In the Seoul metropolitan area, Seoul continued to slow the upward pace while Incheon and

    Gyeonggi province continued to post high price increases rising by 0.55 percent and 0.47

    percent, respectively.

    In addition, price increases in other cities, especially Daegu (up 0.35%) and North

    Gyeongsang province (up 0.33%), accelerated the growth pace.

    Nationwide land transactions in November expanded 39.0 percent or 58,000 land lots from a

    year earlier to 207,000 land lots. In terms of gross area, land transactions were up 39.9

    percent.

    Nationwide land transactions excluding Daegu (down 26.1%) increased year-on-year.

    Particularly, land transactions in Daejeon (up 98.0%), Gangwon province (up 74.2% ), andBusan (up 69.4%) soared.

    (Monthly average, land lot, thousand)Land sales transactions

    Nationwide

    Seoul

    Gyeonggi

    Incheon

    2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    208

    33

    49

    13

    Annual

    208

    26

    45

    13

    Sep

    173

    20

    37

    11

    Oct

    191

    23

    36

    10

    Nov

    148

    14

    28

    8

    Dec

    162

    13

    31

    8

    Jan

    134

    13

    26

    7

    Feb

    164

    15

    34

    7

    Mar

    207

    20

    41

    9

    Apr

    207

    24

    48

    10

    May

    192

    22

    45

    9

    Jun

    215

    27

    49

    10

    Jul

    222

    26

    50

    11

    Aug

    206

    25

    48

    10

    Nov

    207

    19

    48

    11

    Sep

    226

    28

    56

    13

    Oct

    212

    25

    52

    14

    Source: Korea Land Corporation

    Land price increases in Seoul metropolitan (m-o-m, %)

    0.41 (Sep 2009) 0.37 (Oct) 0.36 (Nov)

    Land price increases in other cities (m-o-m, %)

    0.09 (Aug 2009) 0.12 (Sep) 0.16 (Oct) 0.21 (Nov)

    (Percentage change from previous period)Land prices by region

    Nationwide

    SeoulGyeonggi

    Incheon

    2007 2008 2009

    Annual

    3.88

    5.884.22

    4.86

    Q1

    0.96

    1.381.07

    1.24

    Q2

    0.79

    1.070.89

    1.28

    Q3

    0.91

    1.401.05

    1.12

    Q4

    1.15

    1.901.14

    1.13

    Annual

    -0.31

    -1.00-0.26

    1.37

    Q1

    1.23

    1.831.28

    1.36

    Q2

    1.46

    2.171.57

    1.67

    Q3

    1.18

    1.591.28

    2.01

    Q4

    -4.08

    -6.34-4.28

    -3.57

    Q1

    -1.20

    -1.38-1.62

    -1.39

    Q2

    0.35

    0.680.37

    0.53

    Q3

    0.88

    1.301.13

    1.16

    Oct

    0.30

    0.300.42

    0.51

    Nov

    0.30

    0.240.47

    0.55

    Source: Korea Land Corporation

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    37/67

    Economic Bulletin 37

    Land trade volume

    Source: Korea Land Corporation (land trade trend)

    12-4

    12-5

    12-6

    Land and consumer prices since 1970s

    Source: Korea Land Corporation (land prices) & Statistics Korea (consumer prices)

    Land prices by region

    Source: Korea Land Corporation (land price trend)

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    38/67

    38 January 2010

    13. Composite indices of business cycle indicators

    The coincident composite index was up 0.3 percent in November from the previous month

    while the cyclical indicator of coincident composite index remained unchanged.

    Three out of all components of the index including the volume of imports decreased. The

    value of construction completed, the mining & manufacturing production index, the

    domestic shipment index, and the number of non-farm payroll employment were up.

    The year-on-year leading composite index, which foresees the future economic conditions,

    went up 1.3 percentage points month-on-month in November. The 12-month smoothed

    change in leading composite index increased 1.2 percentage points month-on-month,

    running on an upward track since January.

    The value of received construction orders, the value of machinery orders received, the

    indicator of inventory cycle, the ratio of job openings to job seekers, the volume of capital

    goods imports, and the composite stock price index were up.

    Components of coincident composite index in November 2009 (m-o-m)

    Value of construction completed (2.5%), mining & manufacturing production index (1.0%), domestic shipment

    index (0.7%), number of non-farm payroll employment (0.1%), service activity index (0.0%), manufacturing

    operation ratio index (-0.1%), wholesale & retail sales index (-0.7%), volume of imports (-0.9%)

    Components of the leading composite index in November 2009 (m-o-m)

    Value of received construction orders (27.4%), value of machinery orders received (12.7%), indicator of

    inventory cycle (5.7%p), ratio of job openings to job seekers (3.4%p), volume of capital goods imports (0.5%),

    composite stock price index (0.3%), liquidity in the financial institutions (0.3%), net terms of trade index

    (0.1%), spreads between long & short term interest rates (0.0%p), consumer expectations index (-1.0%p)

    Coincident composite index (m-o-m, %)

    Cyclical indicator of coincident composite index

    (m-o-m, p)

    Leading composite index (m-o-m, %)

    12 month smoothed changein leading composite index (%)

    (m-o-m, %p)

    1. Preliminary

    2009

    1. Preliminary

    Jan

    -1.9

    92.4

    -2.2

    0.3

    -4.0

    0.1

    Feb

    0.0

    92.0

    -0.4

    1.1

    -2.9

    1.1

    Aug

    0.9

    96.7

    0.5

    1.0

    9.1

    1.3

    Sep

    0.6

    96.9

    0.2

    0.7

    10.1

    1.0

    Oct1

    0.4

    96.8

    -0.1

    1.1

    11.3

    1.2

    Nov1

    0.3

    96.8

    0.0

    1.3

    12.5

    1.2

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    39/67

    Economic Bulletin 39

    Coincident and leading composite indices

    Source: Statistics Korea

    13-1

    13-2

    13-3

    Cyclical indicator of coincident composite index

    Source: Statistics Korea

    Leading composite index

    Source: Statistics Korea

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    40/67

    The proposed revision of the labor union law was passed by the National Assembly, which

    limits wage payment for full time unionists and allows multiple unions at one workplace.

    Background

    Banning corporations from paying wages to full time union members and allowing multiple

    unions at one workplace have been controversial for 13 years, although both of them need

    to be adopted to help improve Koreas labor-management relations. The revised labor union

    law regulates details concerning ban on paying full time union members and multiple unions

    at one workplace, which aim to guarantee as much freedom as possible to companies and

    unions, while at the same time be in line with the principles of labor-management relations.

    Main contents of the revision

    1. Banning corporations from paying full time union members

    Although full time union members are allowed when employers agree or collective

    agreements approve, they are required to be paid not by companies but by unions.Corporations paying full time labor union members will be punished for not complying with

    the law. However, the revised labor union law provides some flexibility to the wage payment

    system for labor unionists.

    The revision allows unionists to be paid by corporations through the time-off system, in

    which employees receive time off payment when they are engaged in union activities

    considered relevant to the common interests of the union and management, such as

    collective bargaining and job site safety, or when the activities are considered essential for

    operating the union. The ceiling of time off for union activities is set by the deliberation

    committee, based on the number of union members in a worksite.

    40 January 2010

    Labor Union Law Revised

    Policy Issues

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    41/67

    The deliberation committee is composed of 10 members, five appointed by the business

    circle and labor community, and five by the government. The existing time off ceilings are

    examined every three years to decide whether to keep the current limits or revise them. The

    deliberation committee is required to decide on the first time off ceiling by April 30, 2010,

    otherwise the five members appointed by the government will set the ceiling.

    10 million won or less penalty will be imposed on strikes which demand wage payment to

    full time unionists beyond the time off ceiling, even if wage demand is not a major issue of a

    strike, but one of the agenda of a strike. Existing agreements will be in force until they

    expire, although the revised law has taken effect since January 1, 2010.

    2. Multiple unions in one workplace

    Multiple unions will be allowed in one workplace from July 1, 2010, but they are required to

    use a single negotiation channel when they bargain with employers. The revised law

    regulates ways and procedures to set up a single body representing multiple unions, as the

    representative body, if set up in a fair and reasonable way, will increase negotiation

    efficiency and minimize chances of strife between employers and employees.

    The procedure to set up a representative body starts when one of the multiple unions calls

    for a negotiation with the employer. Each union is entitled to call for a negotiation before the

    existing collective agreement expires, and employers are required to announce the call to

    give all unions in the company an equal opportunity to be a representative body. The

    negotiation union is chosen by unions in the company, or if the unions fail to select their

    representative body, the union with more than half of the total corporate union members

    represents the other unions. In the process, the unions are allowed to unite to be a majority

    union, or become part of a larger union.

    If the unions fail to have a representative body with more than half of the total corporate

    union members, they need to create a new negotiation body. The unions of which the

    number of members exceeds 10 percent of the participants in the negotiation union

    selecting process can qualify for being a part of the new representative body. If this fails

    again, the Labor Relations Commission will set up a negotiation body, reflecting the numberof members in each union.

    The negotiation body represents all union members in a company or workplace, without

    being affected by industrial unions or craft unions. However, the revised law allows separate

    negotiation bodies when there are major differences in working conditions, employment

    types, and negotiation styles. The Labor Relations Commission decides on whether separate

    negotiation bodies are necessary, and separate bodies are set up with the same procedures

    as those for setting up general negotiation bodies. Employers as well as unions are allowed

    to request a separate negotiation body.

    Economic Bulletin 41

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    42/67

    The negotiation union is responsible for fairly representing the other unions: It is required to

    listen to minority unions before or during a negotiation. Employers are also responsible for

    taking part in a negotiation without any bias. If the negotiation union fails to be a fair

    representative body, the union claiming to be treated unfairly reports the case to the Labor

    Relations Commission within three months from the incident. The commission then ordersremoval of unfairness if any unequal treatment is detected.

    Terms regulating walkouts and time off union activities are added to the revision: Staging a

    strike requires consent from more than half of the total union members, but individual

    unions are not entitled to deciding on a strike. Only a representative union decides on

    strikes. Union activities taken as time off work are set through a negotiation between a

    representative union and an employer, or by the Labor Relations Commission.

    42 January 2010

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    43/67

    Government to frontload 70% of 2010 estimated expenditure

    Korea will spend some 70 percent of the 2010 estimated expenditure during the first half of

    the year in an effort to accelerate the economic recovery, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance

    said on January 4, 2010. The spending plan covering both the general and special accounts is

    as follows:

    Some 178.4 trillion won of the governments planned annual expenditure of 255.3 trillion won

    will be spent during the period, from which a total of 164 trillion won will be spent to create

    jobs, stabilize low-income households, and support on-going SOC projects.

    The spending plan was released along with the budget spending guidelines, the purposes of

    which are: (i) to facilitate early spending; (ii) to help reduce energy consumption in public

    institutions by 10 percent; and (iii) to enhance transparency and efficiency in budget

    spending.

    Economic Bulletin 43

    EconomicNews Briefing

    (Trillion won, %)

    Annual Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

    Budget 255.3 109.8 68.6 44.8 32.1

    Spending rate (accumulated) 43.0 69.8 87.4 100.0

    2010 budget plan

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    44/67

    44 January 2010

    Asia to launch Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM) in March

    Korea, China, Japan, and 10 member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations

    (ASEAN+3) completed the signing of the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralizaton (CMIM)Agreement on December 24, 2009 to launch the pact on March 24, 2010.

    The CMIM will strengthen the regions capacity to safeguard against increased risks and

    challenges in the global economy. The core objectives of the CMIM are (i) to address

    balance-of-payments and short-term liquidity difficulties in the region and (ii) to supplement

    the existing international financial arrangements.

    The initial amount of the multilateral currency swap fund will be US$120 billion. The CMIM

    will provide financial support through currency swap transactions to the CMIM participants

    facing balance-of-payments and short-term liquidity difficulties. Participating countries are

    entitled to swap its own currency into US dollars in accordance to their contributions.

    Korea to further develop Knowledge Sharing Program (KSP)

    The Knowledge Sharing Program (KSP), a comprehensive policy consultation program

    launched by the Ministry of Strategy and Finance to share Koreas development experience

    with other countries, will be further advanced in 2010 to provide more systematic assistanceto developing countries.

    With Koreas accession to the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) last

    November ahead of chairing the G20 Summit this year, Korea plans to improve its official

    development assistance (ODA) system and establish an original Korean assistance model as

    a part of its contribution to the international society. In this regard, the Korean government

    will upgrade KSP in a more systematized way in 2010 while expanding aid volume to

    developing countries.

    (End-period, %)

    US$ (billion) (%) US$ (billion)

    China1 38.40 32 19.20

    Japan 38.40 32 19.20

    Korea 19.20 16 19.20

    ASEAN 24.00 20 63.10

    Financial contribution Maximum amount of available funds

    1. Hong Kong is included

    CMIM contributions and maximum amount of available funds

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    45/67

    Economic Bulletin 45

    The 2010 KSP will be directed in ways as follows: (i) 20 cases of Koreas economic

    development experience to be selected and developed into programs; (ii) consultants and

    consulting firms specializing in KSP to be introduced; (iii) the link between KSP and

    untied/tied aid to be strengthened to fully support developing countries; (iv) joint

    consultation with international organizations to be accompanied by Koreas official financialaid; and (v) comprehensive consultation to be provided to 4 countries in 2010 from only one

    country in 2009.

    Microcredit program starts from December 2009

    The Miso Credit Foundation, a microcredit lending program in Korea to support low

    income households, opened its first branch on December 15, 2009 as Samsung has set up

    the first office of Microcredit foundation in Suwon. Other non-financial companies including

    Hyundai-Kia Automotive, SK, LG, POSCO and Lotte have also launched their microcredit

    foundations in December 2009. In the banking sector, Kookmin, Woori, Shinhan, Hana and

    Industrial Bank of Korea (IBK) have embarked their foundations.

    The Miso Credit Foundation plans to open some 50 branches by May 2010 and gradually

    expand branches up to 300 through 2010. In addition, 11 regional units of Miso Credit

    Foundation are to kick off by February 2010.

    Names of foundation Dates of establishment

    Samsung Miso Credit Foundation December 15, 2009

    Kookmin Miso Credit Foundation

    December 17, 2009Woori Miso Credit Foundation

    Shinhan Miso Credit Foundation

    Hyundai-Kia Automotive Miso Credit Foundation December 18, 2009

    LG Miso Credit FoundationDecember 21, 2009

    Hana Miso Credit Foundation

    SK Miso Credit Foundation December 23, 2009

    Posco Miso Credit Foundation December 24, 2009

    Lotte Miso Credit Foundation December 28, 2009

    IBK Miso Credit Foundation December 30, 2009

    Current situation of Miso Credit Foundation

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    46/67

    46 January 2010

    Korean group wins landmark UAE nuclear power deal

    A Korean consortium, on December 27, 2009, won a landmark deal valued at about US$20.4

    billion to build four nuclear reactors for the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in a high-profilecontest with a French consortium led by Areva, an industry leader, and a US-Japanese

    consortium including General Electric and Hitachi. The victory for the Korea Electric Power

    (Kepco) led consortium marks the first international deal for Korea, which built its first

    commercial nuclear plant in 1987, making the nation the worlds sixth exporter of the nuclear

    reactors after the US, France, Canada, Russia and Japan. The deal is expected to secure

    stepping stone for the countrys advance into the fast-growing international market for

    nuclear power plants.

    The Kepco led group also includes Hyundai Engineering and Construction, Samsung C&T,

    Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction as well as Westinghouse, a US-based unit of

    Japans Toshiba. According to the deal, the Korean consortium will build four 1,400-

    megawatt nuclear power units in the UAE that will be completed from 2017 to 2020. The

    Korean group expects to earn another US$20 billion by jointly operating the reactors for 60

    years, and hopes to build more plants in the UAE beyond 2020 to meet future demand.

    The Ministry of Knowledge Economy attributed the Korean consortiums winning of the UAE

    deal to its cost-effectiveness, high safety standards, technological know-how and relatively

    short period of construction. President Lee Myung-baks aggressive diplomacy also

    contributed to the success of Koreas nuclear power plant export, which was highlighted in

    his surprise trip to Abu Dhabi on December 26 to support the Korean firms.

    At a summit with President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahayan in Abu Dhabi on December

    27, 2009, President Lee said the contract will deepen relations between Korea and the UAE

    in the economic, cultural, security and diplomatic sectors. The two leaders also agreed to

    continue developing the relationship between the countries into a strategic partnership to

    help ensure their joint development in the future.

    Koreas trade surplus hits all-time high in 2009

    Koreas trade balance posted a record high US$40.98 billion surplus in 2009 as exports fell

    13.8 percent year-on-year to US$363.77 billion while imports declined 25.8 percent from a

    year earlier to US$322.79 billion. Amid the substantial decrease in global trade volume,

    Koreas exports performed relatively well, making the nation the ninth largest exporter in

    2009. Year-on-year export growth in December, in particular, jumped 33.7 percent from the

    previous months 18.1 percent, confirming the upward trend in exports.

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    47/67

    By export item, ships and LCD devices led the healthy export performance by increasing 4.4

    percent and 28.5 percent, respectively. By export destination, exports to emerging markets

    such as China (down 7.5%) and the Middle East (down 11.7%) declined at a smaller pace

    compared with those to developed countries including the US (down 18.9%) and Japan(down 23.7%).

    The Korean government forecasts that exports this year will increase around 9 percent from

    the previous year to post US$410 billion while imports will climb about 21 percent to register

    US$390 billion, resulting in the trade surplus of around US$20 billion.

    Economic Bulletin 47

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    48/67

    48 December 2009

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    49/67

    Economic Bulletin 49

    Tables & Figures

    1. National accounts

    2. Production, shipment and inventory

    3. Production capacity and operation ratio

    4. Consumer goods sales index

    5. Consumer goods shipment index and consumer sentiment index

    6. Machinery orders received, domestic machinery shipment,and estimated facility investment index

    7. Value of construction completed and domestic construction orders received

    8. Composite indices of business cycle indicators and BSI

    9. Balance of payments (I)

    10. Balance of payments (II)

    11. Prices

    12. Employment

    13. Financial indicators

    14. Monetary indicators

    15. Exchange rates

    StatisticalAppendices

  • 8/14/2019 Economic Bulletin (Vol. 32, No.1)

    50/67

    50 January 2010

    (year-on-year change, %, chained 2005 year prices)

    Period

    2002 7.2 -2.2 8.7 8.1 7.1 6.2 7.3

    2003 2.8 -5.4 5.4 0.5 4.4 8.5 -1.5

    2004 4.6 9.1 10.0 1.0 2.1 1.3 3.8

    2005 4.0 1.3 6.2 4.6 1.9 -0.4 5.3

    2006 5.2 1.5 8.1 5.1 3.4 0.5 8.2

    2007 5.1 4.0 7.2 5.1 4.2 1.4 9.3

    2008P 2.2 5.5 3.1 1.6 -1.7 -2.1 -2

    2002 I 6.6 2.3 5.1 10.3 7.5 11.4 2.6

    II 7.0 -2.4 7.2 9.1 7.9 7.2 7.7

    III 6.8 -1.1 9.3 7.7 3.2 -1.5 9.8

    IV 8.1 -5.5 13.1 5.7 9.6 9.4 9.1

    2003 I 3.5 0.7 5.4 2.0 5.1 8.2 2.9

    II 1.8 -1.6 3.1 0.3 4.7 8.4 -0.7

    III 2.0 -9.6 4.3 0.0 2.8 8.3 -5.8

    IV 3.9 -8.0 8.5 -0.4 5.0 9.0 -2.2

    2004 I 5.2 8.2 10.9 -0.1 2.3 5.3 -0.6

    II 5.9 7.6 12.9 1.3 4.9 4.2 6.4

    III 4.8 8.3 10.4 1.0 3.1 1.2 7.7

    IV 2.