economic development update - garrett county, md (09.24.2013)
TRANSCRIPT
Economic Update & Current Initiatives
Mike Koch, Director Garrett County Economic Development
Nestled in the mountains of Western Maryland, Garrett County features high elevations—and higher opportunities for prosperity. Lured by an abundance of resources and natural beauty, over 900 businesses elevate their workforce—and profit margins—in Garrett County. Boasting a solid workforce and affordable real estate, Garrett County blends modern conveniences with country living. Efficient
by design, our technology and transportation infrastructure redefine rural life, offering convenience and proximity to key markets.
In Garrett County, we’re reinventing rural. Mindful of our agrarian roots, we support the organic growth of innovation. Strata joins 33 specialty manufacturers making their mark globally, with cutting-edge safety, technology, construction and consumer products. Our manufacturers are inventive and are reinventing the rural
economy. Visit: www.reinventingrural.com to learn more.
Economic Update
3
Population
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Popu
la'on
(persons)
Popula'on 1969-‐2010 Garre6 County
Popula2on
County population has stagnated since 2000.
Population level has remained flat at 30,000
4 Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
Total Employment
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total Employment (Garre6 County)1969-‐2010
* Based on Seasonally Adjusted employment figures
While population has remained stagnant, Total Employment has risen from 17,470* in 2000 to 20,681* in 2010 – an increase of 17.5% in one
decade or 1.75% per year on average.
5 Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
Monthly Unemployment
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
1994-‐01-‐01
1994-‐09-‐01
1995-‐05-‐01
1996-‐01-‐01
1996-‐09-‐01
1997-‐05-‐01
1998-‐01-‐01
1998-‐09-‐01
1999-‐05-‐01
2000-‐01-‐01
2000-‐09-‐01
2001-‐05-‐01
2002-‐01-‐01
2002-‐09-‐01
2003-‐05-‐01
2004-‐01-‐01
2004-‐09-‐01
2005-‐05-‐01
2006-‐01-‐01
2006-‐09-‐01
2007-‐05-‐01
2008-‐01-‐01
2008-‐09-‐01
2009-‐05-‐01
2010-‐01-‐01
2010-‐09-‐01
2011-‐05-‐01
2012-‐01-‐01
2012-‐09-‐01
2013-‐05-‐01
2014-‐01-‐01
2014-‐09-‐01
2015-‐05-‐01
2016-‐01-‐01
2016-‐09-‐01
Une
mploymen
t Rate (%
)
Monthly Unemployment Rate Comparison (GC,MD,US) 1990-‐2012
Garre9 County
Maryland
United States
County unemployment rates show clear cyclicality with annual peaks from Sep - Jan. While indicative of dependence on seasonal
tourism, the amplitude of this cycle is diminishing.
Variance = 7.6%
Variance = 2.8%
6 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Sta9s9cs
Annual unemployment provides a less erratic view on median unemployment in Garrett County. Since the start of the “Great
Recession” in 2007, the county has clearly outperformed the nation, and over recent years has begun to close the gap with the State of Maryland.
Source: United States Bureau of Economic Analysis
Annual Unemployment
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Per Ca
pita In
come (in
dollars $)
Garre9 County
Maryland
United States
Per Capita Income (Garrett County) 1969-2010
In recent years, Garrett County incomes have gained considerable ground. In 2010, county per capital income was $36,725 – lagging the
national per capita income of $39,937 by only 8.7% Source: United States Bureau of Economic Analysis
Per Capita Income
Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
Entire County Housing
Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
Deep Creek Watershed Housing
Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
Entire County Housing �(excluding Watershed)
Pull Factors (Retail Sales)
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Income Adjusted
Pull Factors 1.244 1.339 1.302 1.359 1.348 1.394 1.429 1.476 1.564 1.555
Designed to measure the degree to which retail sales are captured inside of the county – or conversely “leak” to markets outside the county – pull factors are measured according to the following scale:
< 1 Indicates that county residents are spending a portion of their incomes outside of the county
= 1 Indicates equilibrium; county residents are spending their incomes in the county
> 1 Indicates the county is pulling 100% of the purchasing capacity from county residents as well as attracting purchases from outside the county.
Since 1969 Garrett County has never had its retail sales Pull Factors drop below 1. 12
Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
Shift Share Analysis
The Shift Share Analysis compares the actual performance of the county with the predicted performance based on national performance standards. Based
on this, the county added 2110 more jobs than “expected.” 13
Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
Recession Shift Share Analysis
This Shift Share Analysis shows the out-performance of Garrett County relative to the nation during the Great Recession (2007-2010) 14
Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
Coefficient of Specialization (COS)
16.59%
17.98%
17.27%
15.83%
14.50%
15.00%
15.50%
16.00%
16.50%
17.00%
17.50%
18.00%
18.50%
2001 2004 2007 2010
COS Numbers for Garre6 County
COS Numbers
COS is used to measure the degree of specialization vs. diversification of a region’s employment relative to the nation. Based on “portfolio theory” in finance, the more diversified – the greater the expected returns over time.
COS = 0 = Complete Diversification COS = 100 = Complete Specialization
15 Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
Comparative COS
Frederick Kent Bal2more Howard Allegany Garre9 Anne Arundle
2001 12.64 15.06 12.5 16.85 17 16.59 17.31
2004 12.65 14.98 12.86 16.89 16.55 17.98 17.06
2007 13.82 13.34 12.83 16.78 16.22 17.27 17.08
2010 13.36 13.05 13.05 17.99 17.07 15.83 16.62
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
COS Num
ber %
County COS Number Comparison
Although the Garrett County COS is higher than some other MD counties, COS values are trending downward and reflect an increasingly diversified
economy and workforce and a more stable investment environment. 16 Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
Location Multipliers
Location multipliers – calculated using various methodologies – are used to estimate the actual economic impact of job creation in specific locations. The multiplier value – for example 2.44 – means that for every 1 export-devoted job created in the county, 1 x 2.44 = 2.44 jobs will be created. Manufacturing sector jobs, a strong and healthy sector in Garrett County, best exemplify the importance of this multiplier given that majority of county-based manufacturing is intended for consumption outside of the county.
Economists routinely underestimate, so the lowest multiplier calculated is used for estimations.
17 Source: Garre< County Department of Economic Development
New and Expanding Businesses (Garre9 County) September 2012 -‐ Present
Business AR&E
17 New Businesses
7 Expanding Business
Business and Industrial Parks Occupancy
Keyser's Ridge Business Park - no occupancy�
McHenry Business Park - no occupancy�
Central Garrett Industrial Park:�--Garrett Container Systems, Inc. - 136 employees�--Phenix Technologies, Inc. - 100 employees�--Quality Machining, Inc. - 14 employees�
Northern Garrett Industrial Park:�--Pillar Innovations, LLC - 96 employees�--ClosetMaid Corporation - 157 employees�--New England Truss & Joist - 4 employees�--Robosson Supply West, LLC - 3 employees�--Total Biz Fulfillment, Inc. - 46 employees
Southern Garrett Industrial Park:�--C. Palmer Die Casting, Inc. - 37 employees�--Garrett Industrial Supply - included w/Pioneer Conveyor�--Morningstar, Inc. - 72 employees�--Mt. Top Granite & Marble, LLC - 5 employees�--NuWay Interiors, LLC - 20 employees�--Simon Pearce of MD, Inc. - 42 employees�
Southern Garrett Business & Technology Park:�--GCC Technologies, LLC - 62 employees�--Deep Creek Ready-Mix - 5 employees�--Pioneer Conveyor - 135 employees�--Greater MD Tool & Manufacturing Corp - 10 employees�--Total Biz Fulfillment, Inc. - 12 employees
Business AR&E
Current Initiatives
20
Economic Development
• Existing Business Developments – Beitzel/Pillar – AssetBook – GCC Technologies – Adventure Sports Center International (ASCI) & Deep Creek 2014 ICF
World Championships – The WISP Resort
• New Businesses Developments – Tractor Supply – Strata Safety Products – Cher-Kana, LLC
• In the Exploratory Pipeline – Noble Energy (Vertical Wind Ventures) – Value-Added Agri-business – Artist-in-Residence
21
Infrastructure Initiatives
• Re-opening of I-68 Welcome Center • Grant-funded projects
– County-wide Broadband Initiative – Penny Lane – Business Park Drive – Thayersville Road Realignment – ASCI development – Garrett Trails – hiking & biking
• Keyser’s Ridge Business Park infrastructure • Western Conveyance • Municipality outreach & collaborative planning • DCL Watershed Management
22
Developing Energy Assets • Re-formation of “Commissioners’ Marcellus Shale
Advisory Committee” • Pending Formation: “Mountain Maryland Energy
Advisory Committee” – More broadly chartered to include all relevant energy sectors – Staffed by energy sector experts, academics, and cross-jurisdictional
representatives – Led by professional consultant – Tasked with specific deliverables
• Participation and support for State-led Economic Impact Study of Shale Gas Development – Stakeholder engagement – Parallel completion of Economic Impact Study: Tourism and Deep
Creek Lake
23
“Telling Our Story”
• County Public Relations & Media Outreach – Relocation Guide – Reinventing Rural Campaign Development – Editorial planning
• County Branding Study – Collaboration between Board of Commissioners, Chamber of
Commerce, and Economic Development – Carefully planned roll-out in progress to maximize support and
collaborative adoption • Co-branding guidelines • Style and use guidelines
24