education and neuroscience spring 2011 tutor training presented by tem fuller

31
Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Upload: walter-grant

Post on 21-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Education and Neuroscience

Spring 2011Tutor Training

Presented by Tem Fuller

Page 2: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller
Page 3: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

How does the brain works

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQEiux-AOzs

Page 4: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Reading the Brain

• Mind Reading• 60 minutes

Page 5: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Why the science of our neurons is important for tutors?

• If we do not keep up with the newest discoveries, we may continue with misconceptions about human learning.

Page 6: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Cargo Cult Science

• The American Nobel Laureate, Richard Feynman, in one of his famous graduation addresses at Caltech, warned his audience of young science graduates about 'cargo cult science' (Feynman, 1974).

• His point was that, while it might accord with 'human nature' to engage in wishful thinking, good scientists have to learn not to fool themselves.

Page 7: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Brain-based mythologies in education

• According to modern Neuroscience:

• We use most of our brains most of the time, not some restricted 10% brain usage.

• This is because our brains are densely interconnected, and we exploit this interconnectivity to enable our primitively evolved primate brains to live in our complex modern human world.

• Author: John Geake a • Affiliation: • a Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK• DOI: 10.1080/00131880802082518 • Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year • Published in: Educational Research, Volume 50, Issue 2 June 2008 , pages 123 - 133

Page 8: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Brain-based mythologies in education (continue)

• Although brain imaging delineates areas of higher (and lower) activation in response to particular tasks, thinking involves coordinated interconnectivity from both sides of the brain, not separate left- and right-brained thinking.

• High intelligence requires higher levels of inter-hemispheric and other connected activity. The brain's interconnectivity includes the senses, especially vision and hearing.

•Author: John Geake a •Affiliation:   •a Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK•DOI: 10.1080/00131880802082518 •Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year •Published in: Educational Research, Volume 50, Issue 2 June 2008 , pages 123 - 133

Page 9: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Neuromythologies in education• We do not learn by one sense alone, hence VAK learning styles do

not reflect how our brains actually learn, nor the individual differences we observe in classrooms.

• Neuroimaging studies do not support multiple intelligences; in fact, the opposite is true. Through the activity of its frontal cortices, among other areas, the human brain seems to operate with general intelligence, applied to multiple areas of endeavour.

• Studies of educational effectiveness of applying any of these ideas in the classroom have failed to find any educational benefits.

• Author: John Geake a • Affiliation: • a Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK• DOI: 10.1080/00131880802082518 • Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year • Published in: Educational Research, Volume 50, Issue 2 June 2008 , pages 123 - 133

Page 10: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Neuromythologies in education• Conclusions: The main conclusions arising from

the argument are that teachers should seek independent scientific validation before adopting brain-based products in their classrooms.

• A more skeptical approach to educational panaceas could contribute to an enhanced professionalism of the field.

• Author: John Geake a • Affiliation: • a Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK• DOI: 10.1080/00131880802082518 • Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year • Published in: Educational Research, Volume 50, Issue 2 June 2008 , pages 123 - 133

Page 11: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Neuroscience and Education

• There is a glimmer of truth embedded within various neuromyths.

• Usually their origins do lie in valid scientific research; it is just that the extrapolations go well beyond the data, especially in transfer out of the laboratory and into the classroom (Howard-Jones, 2007).

Page 12: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Brian-based Myths

10%Learning stylesThe brain is a fast computer

There is some truth in every myth …

Page 13: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Judy Willis MDNeurologist/Teacher/Grad School

Ed faculty/Author

How to Rewire Your Burned-Out Brain: Tips from a Neurologist

MAY 22, 2012

Page 14: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

If You're Burned Out, Your Brain Has Rewired to Survival Mode

Neuro-imaging studies reveal the metabolic changes in regions of the brain where activity increases or decreases in response to emotional or sensory input.

In the high-stress state, subject's scans reveal less activity in the higher, reflective brain and more activity in the lower, reactive brain that directs involuntary behaviors and emotional responses.

Page 15: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Judy Willis MD

Prolonged stress correlates with structural increases in the density and speed of the neuron-to-neuron connections in the emotion-driven reactive networks of the lower brain, and corresponding decreased connections in prefrontal cortex conscious control centers.

Page 16: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Why?

The explanation of these changes is generally attributed to the brain's neuro-plasticity of "neurons that fire together, wire together."

The brain literally rewires to be more efficient in conducting information through the circuits that are most frequently activated.

Page 17: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

According to Judy Willis:• As you internalize your thwarted efforts to achieve

your goals and interpret them as personal failure, your self-doubt and stress activate and strengthen your brain's involuntary, reactive neural networks.

• As these circuits become the automatic go-to networks, the brain is less successful in problem-solving and emotional control.

• When problems arise that previously would have been evaluated by the higher brain's reasoning, the dominant networks in the lower brain usurp control.

Page 18: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

The solution according to Judy Willis MD

• Reset Your Brain's Default Neural Network from Retreat to IGNITE!

• The good news is that you can apply what you now understand about your brain's survival mode to take back voluntary control of your choices.

Page 19: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

The Solution

• You can activate the same neuroplasticity that gave dominance to the lower brain networks in the burnout state to construct a new, stronger default response.

Page 20: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Solution

• With more successful experiences, you can reset the circuits that will direct your brain to access its highest cognitive resources for creative problem-solving.

• You can build up new, improved circuitry, switching your responses from retreat to IGNITE!

Willis, J. (2007). Research-based strategies to ignite student learning: Insights from a neurologist and classroom

teacher. ISBN-10: 1416603700 | ISBN-13: 978-1416603702.

Page 21: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

John R. Anderson

Kevin A. Gluck

What role do cognitive architectures play in

intelligent tutoring systems?Anderson, J. R., & Gluck, K. A. (2000, March). Retrieved from What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems?

http://mplab.ucsd.edu/wp-content/uploads/andersongluck2001.pdf

Page 22: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

What you need to do is to attack yourself with small successes for a long tome

Complex cognition can be decomposed into units of cognition of a few hundred milliseconds.

The cognitive tutoring work has progressed at a much higher level, analyzing cognition into unit tasks of often more than 10 seconds.

Page 23: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

The bridge to successful cognitive focus?

Three bridges • The first would get from the brain to models of

the simple steps of cognition. • The second would go from these components to

performance or unit tasks (Indicators of Success). • The third would compose these unit tasks into

educational competences of true significance.

Page 24: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Tutors Help Tutees to Develop Brain Function

“Arguably, you might say teachers [& tutors] are the only professionals charged with the daily development of brain function, and one scientist (Koizumi 2004) has even suggested that education might be defined as a 'nurturing of the brain’.”

Koizumi, H. (2004). The concept of “Developing the Brain”: A new natural science for learning and education. Brain and Development 26(7_, pp. 434-441. In Geake , J. (2008, June). Retrieved from Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research 50(2): doi: 10.1080/00131880802082518

• Author: Paul A. Howard-Jones a • Affiliation: Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, UK• DOI: 10.1080/00131880802082492 • Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year • Published in: Educational Research, Volume 50, Issue 2 June 2008 , pages 119 - 122

Page 25: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Learning requires neurons to change

Page 26: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

WE HAVE NO INTRINSIC MOTIVATION

TO LEARN ACADEMIC MATERIAL

Body rewards: food, water, sex, drugs of abuse

Social rewards:Feel pleasant touch (Rolls et al. 2003)See attractive faces (Aharon et al. 2001)Hear positive words (Hamann & Mao 2002)Interact with others (Rilling et al. 2002)Gain social status (Tooby & Cosmides, 2002)

Page 27: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Reward System:

trigger amygdala activity trigger dopamine release trigger frontal lobe activity

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE

FOR LEARNING TRANSFER

Page 28: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

There is evidence for specific innate cognition modules

(Gallistel, 2003)

1 Fast-mapping of word to object2 Person recognition of face, voice,

clothes3 Obligation computation of what

we owe others and what they owe us4 Imitation of all aspects of the

behavior of others

Page 29: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

Executive Functions The process of learning is a constant analysis and

synthesis of new information + our memory. Our brain works as a creator of theory about

how the world works – the theory is changing every day.

Long-term memory is a constant consolidation of our experiences.

Most likely the consolidation of our new experiences into the refined understanding is happening during sleep

Page 30: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

The brain creates ideas and tests their validity on a daily basis

• The creativity and analysis are working together to improve our life day after day.

• Learning is changing the brain; however, our learning is limited by the architecture of the brain.

• Inductive and deductive reasoning are not invention – they imitate the functions of our brain.

Page 31: Education and Neuroscience Spring 2011 Tutor Training Presented by Tem Fuller

More information

• www.g2conline.org• http://www.g2conline.org/839