eelleeccttrroonniicc ggrraanntt … egmps/nmdot eg… · electronic grant management and...
TRANSCRIPT
EELLEECCTTRROONNIICC GGRRAANNTT
MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT AANNDD
PPEERRFFOORRMMAANNCCEE SSYYSSTTEEMM ((EEGGMMPPSS))
PPRROOJJEECCTT MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT PPLLAANN
((PPMMPP))
EXECUTIVE SPONSOR – [FRANK SHARPLESS, TRANSIT AND RAIL DIVISION
DIRECTOR]
BUSINESS OWNER - [DAVE HARRIS, TRANSIT AND RAIL DIVISION, TRANSIT
MANAGER]
PROJECT MANAGER – [DELILAH GARCIA, TRANSIT AND RAIL DIVISION AND JO
GIRARD, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY]
ORIGINAL PLAN DATE: [JULY 6, 2016]
REVISION DATE: [N/A]
REVISION: [1.0]
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
REVISION: 1.0 DOIT-PMO-TEM-020 i OF vi
REVISION HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................ IV
PREPARING THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................................................... IV
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT ...................................................................................................................................... IV
PROJECT OVERSIGHT PROCESS MEMORANDUM – DOIT, JULY 2007 ...................................................................................... IV
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 FUNDING AND SOURCES ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 CONSTRAINTS .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 DEPENDENCIES ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 ASSUMPTIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 INITIAL PROJECT RISKS IDENTIFIED .............................................................................................................................. 3
2.0 PROJECT AUTHORITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE .............................................................................. 4
2.1 STAKEHOLDERS ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 PROJECT GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................. 4
2.2.1 Describe the organizational structure – Org Chart ..................................................................................... 4
............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2.2 Describe the role and members of the project steering committee ............................................................ 5 2.2.3 Organizational Boundaries, interfaces and responsibilities ........................................................................ 6 Panther International will configure and implement a Web-based Electronics Grants Management and Performance System (eGMPS) using its commercial off-the-shelf software (COTS) software, trademarked as
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
REVISION: 1.0 DOIT-PMO-TEM-020 ii OF vi
BlackCat Grant Management System. The eGMPS will allow the NMDOT staff to plan, evaluate, and administer up to 150 users which will include sub-grantees of the Federal Transit Administration grants and the NMDOT’s Transit and Rail Division staff. ....................................................................................................... 6
2.3 EXECUTIVE REPORTING .............................................................................................................................................. 6
3.0 SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.1.1 Business Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Technical Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2 PROJECT EXCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 7 3.3 CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS ....................................................................................................................................... 7
4.0 PROJECT DELIVERABLES AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 7
4.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE ............................................................................................................................ 8 4.1.1 Project Management Deliverables .............................................................................................................. 9 4.1.2 Deliverable Approval Authority Designations ........................................................................................... 13 4.1.3 Deliverable Acceptance Procedure ............................................................................................................ 14
4.2 PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE ......................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.1 Technical Strategy ..................................................................................................................................... 15 4.2.2 Product and Product Development Deliverables ....................................................................................... 16 4.2.3 Deliverable Approval Authority Designations ........................................................................................... 16 4.2.4 Deliverable Acceptance Procedure ............................................................................................................ 16
5.0 PROJECT WORK .............................................................................................................................................. 17
5.1 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (WBS) .................................................................................................................... 17 5.2 SCHEDULE ALLOCATION -PROJECT TIMELINE ................................................................................................................ 17 5.3 PROJECT BUDGET ................................................................................................................................................... 18 5.4 PROJECT TEAM ...................................................................................................................................................... 19
5.4.1 Project Team Organizational Structure ..................................................................................................... 19 5.4.2 Project Team Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................... 19
5.5 STAFF PLANNING AND RESOURCE ACQUISITION.................................................................................................. 20 5.5.1 Project Staff ............................................................................................................................................... 20
5.6 PROJECT LOGISTICS ........................................................................................................................................... 22 5.6.1 Project Team Training ............................................................................................................................... 22 5.6.1 Resource .................................................................................................................................................... 22
6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROLS ...................................................................................................... 22
6.1 RISK AND ISSUE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................................. 22 6.1.6 ISSUE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................................ 23
6.2 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION - IV&V ............................................................................................. 24 6.3 SCOPE MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................................................... 24
6.3.1 Change Control .......................................................................................................................................... 24 6.4 PROJECT BUDGET MANAGEMENT.............................................................................................................................. 25 6.5 COMMUNICATION PLAN .......................................................................................................................................... 25 6.7 QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND CONTROL ................................................................................................................ 26
6.7.2 Project and Product Review AND ASSESSMENTS ...................................................................................... 27 6.7.3 Agency/Customer Satisfaction .................................................................................................................. 27 6.7.4 PRODUCT DELIVERABLE ACCEPTANCE PROCESS ....................................................................................... 27
6.8 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 27 6.8.2 Project Repository (Project Library) ........................................................................................................... 27
6.9 PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN .............................................................................................................. 27
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
REVISION: 1.0 DOIT-PMO-TEM-020 iii OF vi
7. 0 PROJECT CLOSE ............................................................................................................................................. 28
7.1 ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE .......................................................................................................................................... 28 7.2 CONTRACT CLOSE ................................................................................................................................................... 28
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
REVISION: 1.0 DOIT-PMO-TEM-020 iv OF vi
RREEVVIISSIIOONN HHIISSTTOORRYY
RREEVVIISSIIOONN NNUUMMBBEERR DDAATTEE CCOOMMMMEENNTT
1.0 July 2016 Baseline
2.0
2.1
2.2
PPRREEPPAARRIINNGG TTHHEE PPRROOJJEECCTT MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT PPLLAANN
The workbook for preparation of the Project Management Plan is built around helping the project
manager and the project team to use the Project Management Plan in support of successful
projects. Please refer to it while developing this PMP for your project.
AABBOOUUTT TTHHIISS DDOOCCUUMMEENNTT
PPrroojjeecctt OOvveerrssiigghhtt PPrroocceessss MMeemmoorraanndduumm –– DDooIITT,, JJuullyy 22000077
“Project management plan” is a formal document approved by the executive sponsor and the
Department and developed in the plan phase used to manage project execution, control, and
project close.
The primary uses of the project plan are to document planning assumptions and decisions,
facilitate communication among stakeholders, and documents approved scope, cost and
schedule baselines.
A project plan includes at least other plans for issue escalation, change control,
communications, deliverable review and acceptance, staff acquisition, and risk management.
“Project manager” means a qualified person from the lead agency responsible for all aspects
of the project over the entire project management lifecycle (initiate, plan, execute, control,
close). The project manager must be familiar with project scope and objectives, as well as
effectively coordinate the activities of the team. In addition, the project manager is
responsible for developing the project plan and project schedule with the project team to
ensure timely completion of the project. The project manager interfaces with all areas
affected by the project including end users, distributors, and vendors. The project manager
ensures adherence to the best practices and standards of the Department.
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
REVISION: 1.0 DOIT-PMO-TEM-020 v OF vi
Project product” means the final project deliverables as defined in the project plan meeting all
agreed and approved acceptance criteria.
“Product development life cycle” is a series of sequential, non-overlapping phases comprised
of iterative disciplines such as requirements, analysis and design, implementation, test and
deployment implemented to build a product or develop a service.
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 1
11..00 PPRROOJJEECCTT OOVVEERRVVIIEEWW
A grants management system specifically designed for subrecipients of Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) grant programs will allow users to leverage current and historical data, as
well as improve processes related to grant making, project management, performance measures,
financial tracking, and data analysis.
The Transit and Rail Division currently utilizes a spreadsheet to collect critical data and invoice
all subrecipients in lieu of a grants management system since the deactivation of the prior web-
based system in June of 2012.
The Transit and Rail Division has reviewed their options of what a “grants management system”
should look like and is taking a pro-active approach to implement a system that is able to
accommodate NMDOT, federal and sub-grantee requirements, reduce the risk of errors and
increase the effectiveness of state and federal requirements.
Panther International, the selected vendor, has successfully implemented grant management
systems to 11 state transit offices across the country, which has allowed them to develop a
detailed understanding of the unique needs and challenges faced by state transit offices, as well
as both current and emerging FTA requirements.
11..11 EEXXEECCUUTTIIVVEE SSUUMMMMAARRYY-- RRAATTIIOONNAALLEE FFOORR TTHHEE PPRROOJJEECCTT
The New Mexico Department of Transportation’s (NMDOT) Transit and Rail Division
administers over $30 million annually in transit grants from the FTA throughout the State. The
NMDOT provides federal and state regulatory oversight and compliance of rural transit systems.
Federal transit grants are provided for capital, operations, and administration of rural transit
systems, and performance measures are monitored. Under Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century (MAP-21) and Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act the federal
transportation funding legislation, a federal requirement for receiving these funds is to collect
and analyze performance data as per the National Transit Database (NTD), as well as await
further federal guidance on additional reporting requirements related to safety and asset
management to ensure activities are data-driven and performance based.
The Electronic Grant Management and Performance System (eGMPS) will replace a prior, non-
active, on-line reporting and invoicing system, and shall include the applications and services
required to support the Transit and Rail Division’s statewide federal transit grant programs and
activities. eGMPS shall develop reports that are consistent with FTA reporting systems and
programs, and must have a capacity of 150 concurrent users including sub-grantees and the
NMDOT Transit and Rail Division’s staff. Information on the existing transit systems is
available at: http://dot.state.nm.us/content/dam/nmdot/Transit_Rail/TransitandRailDivisionLegPacket2016.pdf. eGMPS will
satisfy a new requirement for transit asset management by FTA, as well as a new reporting
requirement to promote accountability. FTA’s goal of improved transit asset management is to
implement a strategic approach for assessing needs and prioritizing investments for bringing the
nation’s public transit systems into a state of good repair under 49 U.S.C. Section 5326 / MAP-
21 Section 20019.
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 2
11..22 FFUUNNDDIINNGG AANNDD SSOOUURRCCEESS
SSoouurrccee FFYY1177 AAssssoocciiaatteedd
rreessttrriiccttiioonnss AApppprroovveerr FFYY1188 FFYY1199 FFYY2200 TToottaall
NMDOT/Federal
Transit
Administration
Section 5309 funds
$68,000 N/A Dave Harris $20,000 $20,000 $10,000 $118,000
NMDOT State Road
Fund $19,000 N/A Dave Harris $5,000 $5,000 $7,000 $36,000
NMDOT/Federal
Transit
Administration
Section 5311
$74,432.61 N/A Dave Harris $136,433 $136,433 $144,432 $491,731.61
NMDOT/Federal
Transit
Administration
Section 5311 (For
IV&V)
$19,244.39 N/A Dave Harris $19,244.39
NMDOT/Federal
Transit
Administration
Section 5309 (For
IV&V)
$10,000 $10,000
TOTAL $190,677 $161,433 $161,433 $161,432 $674,975
11..33 CCOONNSSTTRRAAIINNTTSS
NNUUMMBBEERR DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONN
1 Federal Transit Administration requirements
2 Adequate resources
3 State requirements for oversight and project delays
4 Timing to process contracts
11..44 DDEEPPEENNDDEENNCCIIEESS
Types include the following and should be associated with each dependency listed.
Mandatory dependencies are dependencies that are inherent to the work being done.
D- Discretionary dependencies are dependencies defined by the project management team. This may also
encompass particular approaches because a specific sequence of activities is preferred, but not mandatory
in the project life cycle.
E-External dependencies are dependencies that involve a relationship between project activities and non-
project activities such as purchasing/procurement
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 3
NNUUMMBBEERR DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONN TTYYPPEE MM,,DD,,EE
1. Vendor on-going software support M
2. NMDOT business process M
3. Project Certification Committee approval M
4. Contract approvals and purchases E
5. Data migration D
6. Design and infrastructure dependencies M
7. Application environment creation E
8. Software management E
11..55 AASSSSUUMMPPTTIIOONNSS
NNUUMMBBEERR DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONN
1. Vendor will honor contractual obligations
2. Adequate budget is available
3. Adequate staffing levels with proper skill sets necessary to ensure the system will
perform at level expected.
4. Staff is trained properly on the operation of the system to ensure continued
success of the program.
5. Vendor will continue to support software and release upgrades/patches on a
regular basis.
6. Business requirements will have minimal change over the life cycle of the
project.
11..66 IINNIITTIIAALL PPRROOJJEECCTT RRIISSKKSS IIDDEENNTTIIFFIIEEDD
Staff Turnover
Probability Very Low Impact LOW
Mitigation Strategy: Hire and train new NMDOT employees
Contingency Plan: Hire a third party contractor to complete the
work
Contractor declares Probability Low Impact HIGH
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 4
bankruptcy Mitigation Strategy: Software Source Code to be kept by an
escrow agent with NMDOT as the authorized recipient of this
Source Code
Contingency Plan: Monthly data transfer
Contractor Resources
Probability Low Impact MEDIUM
Mitigation Strategy: Contractor to add additional resources to
the project
Contingency Plan: Contractor to hire additional staff to
complete the project
22..00 PPRROOJJEECCTT AAUUTTHHOORRIITTYY AANNDD OORRGGAANNIIZZAATTIIOONNAALL
SSTTRRUUCCTTUURREE
22..11 SSTTAAKKEEHHOOLLDDEERRSS
NNAAMMEE SSTTAAKKEE IINN PPRROOJJEECCTT OORRGGAANNIIZZAATTIIOONN TTIITTLLEE
Frank Sharpless Project Sponsor NMDOT Division Director
Dave Harris Program
administrative
responsibility
NMDOT Transit and Rail Division,
Transit Manager
Delilah Garcia Project management NMDOT Transit and Rail Division,
Project Manager
Joann Girard IT project
management
NMDOT IT Project Manager
22..22 PPRROOJJEECCTT GGOOVVEERRNNAANNCCEE SSTTRRUUCCTTUURREE
22..22..11 DDEESSCCRRIIBBEE TTHHEE OORRGGAANNIIZZAATTIIOONNAALL SSTTRRUUCCTTUURREE –– OORRGG CCHHAARRTT
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 5
22..22..22 DDEESSCCRRIIBBEE TTHHEE RROOLLEE AANNDD MMEEMMBBEERRSS OOFF TTHHEE PPRROOJJEECCTT SSTTEEEERRIINNGG CCOOMMMMIITTTTEEEE
RROOLLEE RREESSPPOONNSSIIBBIILLIITTYY NNAAMMEE FFUUNNCCTTIIOONNAALL AARREEAA
Transit Manager Oversight of Project Dave Harris Transit and Rail Division
CIO Project Certification Eric Roybal Information Technology (IT)
Project Manager Oversight of Project
Deliverables
Delilah Garcia Transit and Rail Division
IT Project
Manager
Oversight of IT Project
Deliverables
Jo Girard Information Technology
User Testing Develop User
Acceptance Testing
T&R Staff and
Subgrantees
Transit and Rail Division
Project Director
Dave Harris
Project Team Members
5 program managers
and test subgrantees
Technical Review
DoIT / NMDOT Tech Staff
Project Managers
Delilah Garcia/Joann
Girard
Executive Steering
Committee
Frank Sharpless
Business Operations Review Team
Grantee’s agency coordinator Staff
TSD Program Management Staff
Planning and TSD Finance Staff
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 6
22..22..33 OORRGGAANNIIZZAATTIIOONNAALL BBOOUUNNDDAARRIIEESS,, IINNTTEERRFFAACCEESS AANNDD RREESSPPOONNSSIIBBIILLIITTIIEESS
Panther International will configure and implement a Web-based Electronics Grants
Management and Performance System (eGMPS) using its commercial off-the-shelf software
(COTS) software, trademarked as BlackCat Grant Management System. The eGMPS will allow
the NMDOT staff to plan, evaluate, and administer up to 150 users which will include sub-
grantees of the Federal Transit Administration grants and the NMDOT’s Transit and Rail
Division staff..
22..33 EEXXEECCUUTTIIVVEE RREEPPOORRTTIINNGG
Meetings will be conducted with NMDOT Management and Project Teams on a regularly
scheduled basis. Whiteboard sessions outlining project task and resource assignment schedules
and agendas are conducted throughout the process. Project Team meetings will be scheduled to
coincide with Panther’s Implementation/Design Team for on-site implementation sessions with
frequency and length of those meetings to be defined. Project status updates reports will be
verbally communicated to Executive Steering Committee, Project Director, and Project
Managers conducted at bi-weekly staff meetings. NMDOT management will be kept informed
on progress of the project periodically throughout the project life cycle. Special oral and written
Project Management and IV&V Reports will be given on project progress to all directors and
managers.
33..00 SSCCOOPPEE
33..11 PPRROOJJEECCTT OOBBJJEECCTTIIVVEESS
33..11..11 BBUUSSIINNEESSSS OOBBJJEECCTTIIVVEESS
NNUUMMBBEERR DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONN
Business Objective 1 Increased efficiency and productivity through a well-managed invoicing
and tracking system
Business Objective 2 Optimize business process, decreasing number of steps, saving time
Business Objective 3 Lower the cost of government by having a more efficient work activity
process tracking
Business Objective 4 Improve reporting capability to executive management and to FTA
Business Objective 5 Substantial NMDOT business process improvements are achievable
through a new grants management system that is available to
subrecipients of FTA grant funds
Business Objective 6 Provide a grants management system for tracking of asset condition to
ensure that current data is utilized in the decision-making process to
ensure a State of Good Repair.
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 7
33..11..22 TTEECCHHNNIICCAALL OOBBJJEECCTTIIVVEESS
NNUUMMBBEERR DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONN
Technical Objective 1 Provide an externally hosted, web-based application and database
which provides the capacity for 24/7 access for up to 150 concurrent
users
Technical Objective 2 Provide capability to meet business, functional and technical
requirements via configurability of the base product offering, and
minimize need for custom development to minimize implementation
and maintenance cost and risk.
Technical Objective 3 Provide capability for role-based secure access to application
workflows and data, and meet current NMDOT standards for password
security.
Technical Objective 4 Meet current NMDOT standards for data security, including access,
transfer, backup, and retention.
33..22 PPRROOJJEECCTT EEXXCCLLUUSSIIOONNSS
There are no project exclusions at this point.
33..33 CCRRIITTIICCAALL SSUUCCCCEESSSS FFAACCTTOORRSS
NNUUMMBBEERR DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONN
Quality Metrics 1 Project does not exceed budget
Quality Metrics 2 Project schedule, assigned tasks & milestones are met within project plan
Quality Metrics 3 System can provide reports
Quality Metrics 4 System is secure and stable and meets uptime requirements
Quality Metrics 5 Staff is trained to maintain and system is operable
Quality Metrics 6 Data integrity is maintained.
44..00 PPRROOJJEECCTT DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEESS AANNDD MMEETTHHOODDOOLLOOGGYY
NMDOT will use Panther’s BlackCat Grant Management System as the industry standard in
implementing similar projects within other state DOT’s. The NMDOT will develop a schedule
of deliverables with the vendor in order to determine milestone dates on completion of the
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 8
customization of the electronic grants management and performance system. The project will be
subdivided in smaller, manageable phases with completion of one phase before commencing the
next phase.
44..11 PPRROOJJEECCTT MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT LLIIFFEE CCYYCCLLEE
PPHHAASSEE SSUUMMMMAARRYY OOFF PPHHAASSEE KKEEYY DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEESS
Initiate During the Initiation Phase,
the project manager of the
delivery team will kick-off the
project, validate the scope,
facilitate the logistics and
initiate the project plan.
Project Kickoff Discussion
Communication Plan
Project Schedule
Product Demonstration
Plan In the Planning Phase, the
delivery team will conduct the
analysis of DOT’s
requirements and define the
architecture and design of the
solution. The requirements
include business requirements,
functional requirements and
technical requirements.
Ensure objectives of the
Project are successfully
accomplished within scope
schedule, and budget
Development of the
Project Management Plan
Develop
In the Development Phase, the
delivery team will actually
configure the proposed
system. It includes the
installation, development and
configuration and testing of
components and sub-systems
comprising the proposed
solution.
Joint Application Design
(JAD) Session
System Requirement
Specification (SRS)
Document
System Design Document,
as identified in the SRS
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 9
and JAD
Configure in accordance
with the SRS and System
Design
Configure specific reports
for grant tracking
Storage and retrieval of
specified document
Deploy & Test In this phase, the delivery
team ports the system from a
Test environment to
Production environment and
conduct the system roll out for
successfully “Go-Live”
Data Migration
System Go-Live
System Testing
User Beta Testing
User Acceptance Test
Train In this phase, the delivery
team will train the subject
matter experts of each group
for the end user training. The
delivery team will also train
admin staff to prepare them
for the system maintenance
and the application support
Training Plan and
Documentation
Training – on-site and
remotely
Close In this phase, the delivery
team ensures that every detail
of the project has been
addressed and proper closure
is attained.
Project Closure
Project Review Meeting
44..11..11 PPRROOJJEECCTT MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEESS
4.1.1.1 Communication Plan
Description Defines the messages, communication
channels, frequency and target audience of
project communications
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Agreed Communication Plan in the meeting
Standards for Content & Format NMDOT Communication Plan Template or
Meeting Minutes
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 10
Quality Review Reviewed in meeting between Panther and
NMDOT project management
4.1.1.2 Escalation Plan
Description Method, procedure and process to follow
should issues arise that requires escalation
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Agreed Escalation Plan in the meeting will be
documented
Standards for Content and Format Meeting Minutes
Quality Review Reviewed in meeting between Panther and
NMDOT project management
4.1.1.3 Timeline Schedule and Project Management Plan
Description A timeline schedule with specific dates for
each deliverable within a NMDOT provided
template or as agreed upon between the
Panther and NMDOT project managers.
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Agreed timeline schedule in the meeting will
be distributed
Standards for Content and Format Panther’s Project Plan template
Quality Review NMDOT staff will review the draft deliverable
and provide comments, suggestions, and
revisions on the timeline. NMDOT comments
will be created and compiled into one
document and will be distributed to Panther.
Panther will update the document and provide
the updated draft.
4.1.1.4 JAD & System Requirement Specification (SRS) Document
Description A business, functional, and technical session to
define the functional requirements as collected
from business users within the scope of the
project will be used for the customization
required of the electronic grants management
and performance system (eGMPS)
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Signed off document
Standards for Content and Format NMDOT Approved SRS Template
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 11
Quality Review NMDOT staff will review the draft deliverable
and provide comments, suggestions, and
revisions on the timeline. NMDOT comments
will be created and compiled into one
document and will be distributed to Panther.
Panther will update the document and provide
the updated draft.
4.1.1.5 Technical Architecture Definition (TAD)
Description Technical Architecture Document (TAD)
describes the specification and configuration of
the system on infrastructure level for the NM
DoIT Technical Architecture Review
Committee (TARC)
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Signed off document
Standards for Content and Format NMDOT Approved TAD Template
Quality Review NMDOT staff will review the draft deliverable
and provide comments, suggestions, and
revisions on the timeline. NMDOT comments
will be created and compiled into one
document and will be distributed to Panther.
Panther will update the document and provide
the updated draft.
4.1.1.6 Off-The-Shelf Software (COTS) Installed
Description Install an off-the-shelf software for an
electronic grants management and performance
system
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Ensure all the installed services and software
are running
Standards for Content and Format Installations as per Panther’s best practices
Quality Review NMDOT Staff verifying the installed
components
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 12
4.1.1.7 Configured Electronic Grants Management and Performance System (eGMPS)
Description Configure and customize the electronic grants
management and performance system to reflect
NMDOT work activities and reporting
requirements
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Unit Tested Components, reported in Status
Report
Standards for Content and Format Per approved SRS, Design and Test
documentation
Quality Review NMDOT staff will conduct the soundness
check
User Acceptance Testing will be performed
during Testing Phase
4.1.1.8 Data Migration
Description Panther will construct a process to migrate the
existing NMDOT’s data into the new system
and, upon NMDOT’s review and approval,
deploy the approved data and system
customizations to the Production environment.
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria NMDOT Staff to perform quality check of data
migrated
Standards for Content and Format Per migration report
Quality Review Migration report will be reviewed
Verification check by NMDOT IT Staff
User Acceptance Testing will be performed in
Testing Phase
4.1.1.9 Define User Acceptance Testing (UAT)
Description Maintains a list of the issues and changes
identified during the Testing
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Reported in Status Report
Standards for Content and Format Panther’s tracking system
Quality Review Reviewed in meeting between Panther and
NMDOT Project managers
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 13
4.1.1.11 Completed Training
Description Provide the end-user training that will include
the basic operational procedures for:
Navigating within the grants management
system
Search for data
Develop reports
Provide the training for system
administration (IT and Application
administrators) personnel on the
maintenance, operations, and
troubleshooting aspects of the new solution
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria Completed training of end users and IT,
reported in Status Report.
Standards for Content and Format Training will be held in Classroom and/or
online.
Quality Review The training material will be provided to assist
the trainees in retaining the information.
Standards for Content and Format Panther Reference Guide Template
Quality Review Reviewed in meeting between Panther and
NMDOT project management
44..11..22 DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE AAPPPPRROOVVAALL AAUUTTHHOORRIITTYY DDEESSIIGGNNAATTIIOONNSS
DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE
NNUUMMBBEERR DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE AAPPPPRROOVVEERRSS ((WWHHOO
CCAANN AAPPPPRROOVVEE)) DDAATTEE
AAPPPPRROOVVEEDD
PRJ-DEL-001 Initial Business Analysis Dave Harris
PRJ-DEL-002 Project Management Plan (PMP) Dave Harris
PRJ-DEL-003 System Requirement and Design
Documentation
Dave Harris
PRJ-DEL-004 Technical Architecture Document
(TAD)
Dave Harris
PRJ-DEL-005 System Development Configuration Dave Harris
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 14
DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE
NNUUMMBBEERR DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE AAPPPPRROOVVEERRSS ((WWHHOO
CCAANN AAPPPPRROOVVEE)) DDAATTEE
AAPPPPRROOVVEEDD
PRJ-DEL-006 System Deployment Dave Harris
PRJ-DEL-007 System Testing and Acceptance Dave Harris
PRJ-DEL-008 Training Dave Harris
PRJ-DEL-009 Maintenance and Technical Support Dave Harris
PRJ-DEL-010 Ongoing Maintenance and Technical
Support
Dave Harris
44..11..33 DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE AACCCCEEPPTTAANNCCEE PPRROOCCEEDDUURREE
The NMDOT will use a project milestone document and the deliverables described in the
executed contract. The NMDOT Project Managers will sign off on all completed deliverables in
the contract.
44..22 PPRROODDUUCCTT LLIIFFEE CCYYCCLLEE
PPHHAASSEE SSUUMMMMAARRYY OOFF PPHHAASSEE KKEEYY DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEESS
1- Initiation Project team formation and
project kickoff
Initial Business Analysis
Kick-off meeting
2- Planning Detailed planning of project
activities
Project Management
Activities:
Project and Resource
Plan
4 - Implementation Detailed requirement & design
development, and
configuration/testing of the
application. Final training of
users.
Scoping and Design
System Requirements
and Design
Documentation
Activities:
Joint Application
Design (JAD) session
System Requirements
Documentation
System Design
Document
Technical Architecture
Design (TAD)
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 15
System Development and
Configuration:
Security
Grant Pre-Award,
Application and Award
Functions
Track Annual Awards
Store and Retrieve
Documents
System Deployment:
Licensing
Data Migration
System Testing and
Acceptance:
System Testing
User Beta Testing
User Acceptance Test
(UAT)
Training:
Training Plan and
Documentation
Training
4 - Closure Project Closure
44..22..11 TTEECCHHNNIICCAALL SSTTRRAATTEEGGYY
This project will be subdivided into small, more manageable phases, at the end of which Panther
International, Inc. and NMDOT will review the deliverables from one phase before commencing
the next. This allows the Project Team to closely monitor the progress of a project and to ensure
the needs and expectations of our customers are met.
More specifically, during the technical implementation of the project, it will be identified in the
phases of Analysis, Configure, and Test.
The Analyze phase will help ensure that the design put in place for NMDOT that will scale
appropriately to meet their long term maintenance management needs. A thorough analysis of
infrastructure, business requirements, and functional requirements is done. Based on the analysis,
Panther defines the Technical Architecture Specifications and Solution Design Specifications of
the system.
The Configure phase constitutes the installation of software and the development and
configuration of the components. The build starts with an off-the shelf product called BlackCat
Grant Management System and not from scratch. The emphasis is to achieve maximum results
with configuration. This procedure provides greater scalability, reduced time of development,
easy maintenance, and reduced cost. During build, every component is unit tested and iterative
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 16
prototyping checkpoints are scheduled with the customer to ensure that requirements are
correctly translated into the design.
Testing phase is also divided into different areas that include component testing, integration
testing, and user acceptance testing. Component testing validates each component of the system
is functioning. Integration testing validates that various subsystems and external systems
interface with the electronics grants management system software as defined in the requirements.
The User Acceptance Testing validates all the use cases and business functional and technical
requirements of the system.
44..22..22 PPRROODDUUCCTT AANNDD PPRROODDUUCCTT DDEEVVEELLOOPPMMEENNTT DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEESS
4.2.2.1 BlackCat Grant Management System
Description –
The product deliverable will be
an electronic grants
management and performance
system
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria – Successful UAT will
determine acceptance criteria
Standards for Content and Format – The electronic
grants management and performance system.
Quality Review – NMDOT will develop a random
sampling plan and implement the plan to verify
accuracy of data migration. A comprehensive test of
all forms, workflows, fields and reports will be
conducted to verify accuracy of implementation to
approved requirements and design.
4.2.2.2 Performance Reports
Description –grants
management system’s will
contain a set of reports on
performance indicators
Deliverable Acceptance Criteria – Report updates
correctly for the time period specified
Standards for Content and Format – NMDOT will
determine parameters for report
Quality Review – Audits will be conducted of data from
reports.
44..22..33 DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE AAPPPPRROOVVAALL AAUUTTHHOORRIITTYY DDEESSIIGGNNAATTIIOONNSS
As described in Section 4.1.2.
44..22..44 DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE AACCCCEEPPTTAANNCCEE PPRROOCCEEDDUURREE
The NMDOT Transit and Rail Division will be provided with a UAT protocol to test the system.
UAT will identify issues with using the system and will be utilized to address issues with the
BlackCat Grant Management System. When the UAT is completed, the NMDOT Transit and
Rail Division will make a recommendation to the Executive Steering Committee for acceptance.
A formal acceptance letter will be signed with Panther after each successful deliverable.
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 17
55..00 PPRROOJJEECCTT WWOORRKK
55..11 WWOORRKK BBRREEAAKKDDOOWWNN SSTTRRUUCCTTUURREE ((WWBBSS))
As described in Section 5.2.
55..22 SSCCHHEEDDUULLEE AALLLLOOCCAATTIIOONN --PPRROOJJEECCTT TTIIMMEELLIINNEE
Project Phase Due Date Milestone/Deliverable
Initiation 8/1/2016 Initial Business Analysis
• Kick-off meeting
Planning 9/1/2016 Project Management Activities:
• Project and Resource Plan Update
Implementation 10/1/2016 System Requirements and Design Documentation Activities:
• Joint Application Design (JAD) session
• System Requirements Documentation
• System Design Document
• Technical Architecture Design (TAD)
Implementation 11/1/2016 System Development and Configuration:
• Security
• Grant Pre-Award, Application and Award Functions
• Track Annual Awards
• Store and Retrieve Documents
Implementation 12/1/2016 System Deployment:
• Licensing
• Data Migration
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 18
Implementation 1/2/2017 System Testing and Acceptance:
• System Testing
• User Beta Testing
• User Acceptance Test (UAT)
Implementation 1/29/2017 Training:
• Training Plan and Documentation
• Training
Closeout 1/29/2017 Customer Acceptance, transition to operations
55..33 PPRROOJJEECCTT BBUUDDGGEETT
Phase / Activity Associated Deliverables Estimated
Budget/Cost
FY 17
FY 18 FY 19-20
Initiation Initial Business Analysis
Kick-off meeting
$5,572
Planning Project Management Activities:
Project and Resource Plan
$5,572
Implementation System Requirements and Design
Documentation Activities:
Joint Application Design
(JAD) session
System Requirements
Documentation
System Design Document
Technical Architecture
Design (TAD)
$22,286
Implementation System Development and
Configuration:
Security
Grant Pre-Award, Application
and Award Functions
Track Annual Awards
Store and Retrieve
Documents
$13,929
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 19
Phase / Activity Associated Deliverables Estimated
Budget/Cost
FY 17
FY 18 FY 19-20
Implementation System Deployment:
Licensing
Data Migration
$2,786
Implementation System Testing and Acceptance:
System Testing
User Beta Testing
User Acceptance Test (UAT)
$2,786
Implementation Training:
Training Plan and
Documentation
Training
$2,786
Closeout Customer Acceptance, transition to
operations
$0
IV&V Independent Verification and
Validation
$29,244.39
Contingency $50,000 $50,000 $100,000
Maintenance and
Technical
Support
$55,716 $111,433 $222,865
TOTALS* *Includes GRT $190,677 $161,433 $322,865
55..44 PPRROOJJEECCTT TTEEAAMM
55..44..11 PPRROOJJEECCTT TTEEAAMM OORRGGAANNIIZZAATTIIOONNAALL SSTTRRUUCCTTUURREE
See Section 2.2.1
55..44..22 PPRROOJJEECCTT TTEEAAMM RROOLLEESS AANNDD RREESSPPOONNSSIIBBIILLIITTIIEESS
ROLE RESPONSIBILITY NAME FUNCTIONAL AREA
Program Manager Oversight of Project Delilah Garcia Transit and Rail Division
Team Member Work with vendor Marcy Eppler Transit and Rail Division
Team Member Work with vendor Deborah Bach Transit and Rail Division
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 20
ROLE RESPONSIBILITY NAME FUNCTIONAL AREA
Team Member Work with vendor Selected
Subgrantees
Transit Agency End
Users
IT Project
Manager
IT Project Process Jo Girard IT PMO
IT Technical
Team
SMEs As required IT Apps and DBAs
Vendor Project
Manager
Oversight of Vendor
Project Deliverables
and Budget
TBD Application Development
Vendor Technical
Team
Application
configuration
TBD Application Development
IV&V Independent
validation
TBD IV&V (Burger, Carroll &
Associates, Inc)
55..55 SSTTAAFFFF PPLLAANNNNIINNGG AANNDD RREESSOOUURRCCEE AACCQQUUIISSIITTIIOONN
55..55..11 PPRROOJJEECCTT SSTTAAFFFF
ROLE RESPONSIBILITIES
Executive Steering
Committee (ESC)
Meet at least once monthly
Provide strategic direction and promote the vision for Enterprise
Content Management
Advise project on policy issues
Review, evaluate, and provide direction to the Project Director
and Project Team Members on implementation and deployment
strategies
Monitor the project progress
Provide recommendations on issues escalated to the committee
Assist in mitigating strategic project risks
Represent the point of view of key stakeholders including
technology-enabled customers and state government executives
NM DOIT Provide project implementation oversight
Ensure proper project management and cost reporting
Certify and approve funding prior to each phase of the project
Project Sponsor Provide strategic direction
Advise project on policy issues
Review, evaluate, and provide direction to the Project Director
and Project Team Members on implementation and deployment
strategies
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 21
ROLE RESPONSIBILITIES
Monitor the project progress
Assist in mitigating strategic project risks
Program Director Report to ESC on project status, issues, budget, and activities
Prepare Steering Committee meeting agenda and meeting
materials
Review and approve expenditures of funds
Approve business process reengineering
Monitor and report the activities of the NMDOT Project Team,
assuring adherence to the project plan, budget and schedule.
Project Managers
(Business, IT and
Vendor)
Ensure involvement of participants in order to meet deadlines
Ensure mitigation of project issues and risks
Maintain a current copy of the project budget
Prepare the contract for professional services from Vendor
Procure software for NMDOT
Comply with approved IT Infrastructure policies & procedures
Lead Business Process Reengineering efforts
Facilitate defining document metadata and setting up document
taxonomy
Plan system interfaces and document migration processes
Manage testing and validating NMDOT electronics grants
management and performance system (eGMPS)
Provide contract and Vendor oversight
Ensure Vendor deliverables meet the business & system
requirements
Monitor the project and contract to ensure delivery of complete,
accepted deliverables on schedule
Serve as a contact for the Vendor Team Manager, review and
accept weekly status reports, project milestones, deliverables, and
issues logs
Establish and maintain a coordinated project manual that includes
all IT and non-IT tasks and activities necessary to fully execute
the project and to achieve project goals
Address, review, and submit deliverables to vendor from the
NMDOT Project Team members
Monitor the project activities, assuring adherence to the project
plan
Advise the Vendor Team(s) on issues and risks
IT Specialists
(Programmers,
NMDOT System
Experts and
Provide IT subject matter expertise
Work with Project Manager to determine hardware, software,
network and technical requirements.
Work with Project Director to define technical system interface
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 22
ROLE RESPONSIBILITIES
Developers) requirements.
Provide IT perspective and guidance for technology issues
Contractor Ensure compliance with the Contract and the approved work plan.
Develop and submit all deliverables as required by the Contract.
Meet the Project schedule and milestones as defined in the Work
Plan and the Contract.
55..66 PPRROOJJEECCTT LLOOGGIISSTTIICCSS
55..66..11 PPRROOJJEECCTT TTEEAAMM TTRRAAIINNIINNGG
See Training Deliverables in Section 5.2.
55..66..11 RREESSOOUURRCCEE
Resource Cost Estimate
Estimated Hours Availability Skill Set
Panther Per Contract n/a Upon request Technical experts
66..00 PPRROOJJEECCTT MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT AANNDD CCOONNTTRROOLLSS
66..11 RRIISSKK AANNDD IISSSSUUEE MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT
66..11..11 RRIISSKK MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT SSTTRRAATTEEGGYY
Risks will be identified, monitored and tracked on an ongoing basis for the project. Risks will be
logged and scored based on the probability of occurrence and impact (severity) on the project if
the risk occurs.
66..11..22 PPRROOJJEECCTT RRIISSKK IIDDEENNTTIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN
A risk evaluation tool has been built within an Excel spreadsheet. This is the primary tool to be
used to list and categorize project risks. The sequence of activity is as follows; Risk
Identification – The process of identifying potential risks and commenting the specific
characteristics of each.
66..11..33 PPRROOJJEECCTT RRIISSKK MMIITTIIGGAATTIIOONN AAPPPPRROOAACCHH
All identified risks will have appropriate mitigation strategies/plans. For those risks that are
highly probable and have significant impact to the project will develop contingency plans.
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 23
66..11..44 RRIISSKK RREEPPOORRTTIINNGG AANNDD EESSCCAALLAATTIIOONN SSTTRRAATTEEGGYY
Risk monitoring and control will be part of every project status meeting. Risk identification will
be the responsibility of all members of the project team. The Project Director and Project
Managers will be responsible for tracking risks and for developing mitigation strategies and
contingency plans that address the risks identified by the team.
This project will follow a continuous risk management strategy. Risk will be assessed routinely
to ensure that identified risks are being dealt with appropriately and that new risks are identified
and dealt with as early as possible.
66..11..55 PPRROOJJEECCTT RRIISSKK TTRRAACCKKIINNGG AAPPPPRROOAACCHH
RISK LEVEL MITIGATION COMMENT
Insufficient
funding
Low Prioritize each agency’s
funding request and
develop contingency
plans to allocate funds
Insufficient funding allocation means that
either some agencies requesting funds will
receive $0 or agencies will not have enough
to purchase software, hardware and
implementation services.
Agency
Resource
availability
High Ensure stakeholders are
involved and support the
project team members
Lack of resources to complete project
activities can lead to delays in project
schedule.
Extended
timeline
caused by
state
approval
process
High Plan for State requirements for oversight as well as
the procurement process provide numerous
opportunities for project delays.
66..11..66 IISSSSUUEE MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT
66..11..66..11 IINNTTEERRNNAALL IISSSSUUEE EESSCCAALLAATTIIOONN AANNDD RREESSOOLLUUTTIIOONN PPRROOCCEESSSS
NMDOT Project team will work together to address and provide a resolution to any issues that
may come up during the project.
66..11..66..22 EEXXTTEERRNNAALL IISSSSUUEE EESSCCAALLAATTIIOONN AANNDD RREESSOOLLUUTTIIOONN PPRROOCCEESSSS
NMDOT Project team will work with vendor to address and provide a resolution to any issues
that may come up during the project. With any project, no matter how comprehensive the
planning process, issues arise that need to be addressed.
When the project team identifies an issue, it will be added to the project issues tracking tool. An
issue can also be identified by anyone affiliated with the project, although the project team will
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 24
be primarily responsible for tracking issues through to resolution. The project team will review
the issues weekly, or more frequently during critical project timelines such as pre-deployment.
Issues, which could negatively affect the project, will be brought to the project ESC attention
according to the change control process in section
The process of tracking an issue is outlined here:
1. An issue is identified.
2. It is added to the issue tracking system, assigned an issue number with a brief explanation
of the issue and date entered.
3. The issue is assigned to someone and potential action to be taken.
4. As action is taken, it is noted with the issue.
5. If possible, an estimated completion date is entered.
6. Upon completion of an issue, the actual completion date is noted with the resolution.
Listed below are examples of how an issue can be resolved:
An issue can become a task added to the project plan with proper approval, if new, or
within scope of the project.
It could be resolved by an action taken.
A document can be created which addresses the issue.
A resolution could create new issues that need to be addressed.
A new policy could be created which addresses the issue.
The project team is primarily responsible to resolve issues or follow-up to be sure action is being
taken to resolve an issue.
66..22 IINNDDEEPPEENNDDEENNTT VVEERRIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN AANNDD VVAALLIIDDAATTIIOONN -- IIVV&&VV
The IV&V vendor was selected from the statewide price agreement (40-000-14-00106 AN). The
IV&V vendor will develop a complete IV&V plan in conjunction with the project team.
66..33 SSCCOOPPEE MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT PPLLAANN
The scope of the project as negotiated with Panther International and included in the professional
services contract will be the responsibility of the Project Manager to ensure that all deliverables
are being completed. The Project Manager and Project Director will meet weekly to discuss
project scope and determine if any changes will be necessary and require an amendment to the
contract. Any change to the approved project scope will follow change control process describe
below. This will also address managing stakeholder expectations.
66..33..11 CCHHAANNGGEE CCOONNTTRROOLL
66..33..11..11 CCHHAANNGGEE CCOONNTTRROOLL PPRROOCCEESSSS
The scope of the project as negotiated with Panther International, Inc. included in the
professional services contract will be the responsibility of the Project Manager to ensure that all
deliverables are being completed. The Project Manager and Project Sponsor will meet weekly to
discuss project scope and determine if any changes will be necessary and require an amendment
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 25
to the contract. Any change to the approved project scope will follow change control process
describe below. This will also address managing stakeholder expectations.
66..33..11..22 CCHHAANNGGEE CCOONNTTRROOLL BBOOAARRDD ((CCCCBB))
The CCB for this project will be the Project Director who is responsible for project delivery
within budget and is authorized to approve changes to the project plan.
66..44 PPRROOJJEECCTT BBUUDDGGEETT MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT
66..44..11 BBUUDDGGEETT TTRRAACCKKIINNGG
The budget will be tracked by the Project Manager and updates provide to the Project Sponsor
utilizing excel spreadsheets and all drawdowns will be tracked in SHARE financial system.
66..55 CCOOMMMMUUNNIICCAATTIIOONN PPLLAANN
The Executive Steering Committee will meet at a minimum on a monthly basis in order to
review project progress, deliverables/milestones, provide direction to the Project Director, and
team.
Specific requests for expenditure authorization should be forwarded to the ESC representatives.
If funding approval is an agenda item on the regular ESC meeting, the request and associated
justification for spending should be circulated to committee members at least seven (7) days in
advance of the ESC meeting. If funding approval is required in a timeframe that does not
coincide with the ESC meeting schedule, it is the responsibility of the Project Director to send a
request and justification directly to the ESC members. Summary of all action shall be
documented in team status reports and reported to the ESC at the next meeting.
66..66 PPEERRFFOORRMMAANNCCEE MMEEAASSUURREEMMEENNTT ((PPRROOJJEECCTT MMEETTRRIICCSS))
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
Quality Metrics 1 Project does not exceed budget
Quality Metrics 2 The project schedule, assigned tasks and milestones are met within
project plan
Quality Metrics 3 System can provide reports
Quality Metrics 4 All NMDOT data is successfully migrated into Panther’s electronic
grants management system’s platform
Quality Metrics 5 System is secure and stable
Quality Metrics 6 Staff is trained to maintain and system is operable
Quality Metrics 7 Data integrity is maintained.
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 26
66..77 QQUUAALLIITTYY OOBBJJEECCTTIIVVEESS AANNDD CCOONNTTRROOLL
Quality Management is an important aspect of any project to ensure that the product delivered is
accepted and works as designed. Each functional organization is responsible for the quality of its
contribution to the project and will apply its internal quality standards to project products and
services. The project team will assess the projects products and services based on the standards
established by the functional organizations represented on the project.
There are number of ways that quality has been built into this project. The first is IV&V, which
will make sure the project meets its expected requirements through a third party evaluation of the
project. The second is the integrated project control process and change control process, which
assure that any changes that are made to the project are executed in a structured manner. The
most important of these is the change control process to minimize the change of scope to the
project and if scope does change, it is done knowing the impact to the project. The third process
for quality management is the risk management plan, which measures, mitigates and includes
contingency plans for each risk.
The project team will also create lessons learned at the end of the project and among phases as
needed. In-phase lessons learned will be incorporated into the next phase of the project, where
applicable, and be part of the project library that will be available for future projects to use. All
of these processes combined will create a product that has quality that is built in, not tested in
after the fact. This will provide an environment that maximizes opportunities to control quality.
NO. QUALITY STANDARD TRACKING TOOL OR
MEASURE
1 Project phase is completed by the established finish date. Project Schedule Project Status
2 Project is completed within budget. Project Charter Project Status
3 Monthly project reviews show contractors deliver requirements specified in the contract by due dates or pay penalties.
Vendor Contract Final Customer Acceptance
4 Project issues are resolved and documented within 10 calendar days of identification or extensions are justified.
Issues Tracking
5 Project will be completed based on the original project scope and approved scope changes.
Project Charter Project Plan Control Change Request
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 27
66..77..22 PPRROOJJEECCTT AANNDD PPRROODDUUCCTT RREEVVIIEEWW AANNDD AASSSSEESSSSMMEENNTTSS
REVIEW TYPE QUALITY STANDARD TOOLS REVIEWER REPORTS
Requirements Project is completed within budget.
Contract deliverables
Project Manager
Produced by vendor
Plans All plans must meet contract deliverables
Scope of work by vendor
Project Manager
Produced by vendor
Milestones Project phase is completed by the established finish date.
Contract Deliverables
Project Manager
Updates to Project Plan
Testing Execution of User Acceptance Testing (UAT).
System Test Scripts procedure. for User Acceptance Testing (UAT).
Project Manager
Produced by Vendor
66..77..33 AAGGEENNCCYY//CCUUSSTTOOMMEERR SSAATTIISSFFAACCTTIIOONN
AREAS OF FEEDBACK WHEN HOW OFTEN
Agency awareness Business Owner Meetings Monthly
Quality of communications ESC Steering committee meetings Monthly
Manages project tasks ESC Steering committee meetings Monthly
66..77..44 PPRROODDUUCCTT DDEELLIIVVEERRAABBLLEE AACCCCEEPPTTAANNCCEE PPRROOCCEESSSS
The NMDOT Chief Information Officer will take delivery of media; manuals; contracts;
licenses; services agreements; configuration settings; status of patches to COTS products; in-
house or vendor developed code; test cases, routines, and scripts; and other items required for the
project. The NMDOT CIO will take delivery of such products only after the product
deliverables have been accepted by the Project Director (or designee).
66..88 CCOONNFFIIGGUURRAATTIIOONN MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT
66..88..22 PPRROOJJEECCTT RREEPPOOSSIITTOORRYY ((PPRROOJJEECCTT LLIIBBRRAARRYY))
A project repository, consisting of a shared server with multiple folders will be developed by
NMDOT staff members as a means to provide a central repository for all project documentation
and deliverables.
66..99 PPRROOCCUURREEMMEENNTT MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT PPLLAANN
All procurement for project goods and services must be performed under the guidance and
direction of New Mexico State Procurement Statues.
ELECTRONIC GRANT MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (EGMPS)
PAGE | 28
77.. 00 PPRROOJJEECCTT CCLLOOSSEE
77..11 AADDMMIINNIISSTTRRAATTIIVVEE CCLLOOSSEE
Administrative Close occurs at both the end of each phase and at the end of project. This
closeout activity consists of verification that deliverables were met. Acceptance is formalized
and phase activities are administratively closed out. The identification of closeout activities for
the eGMPS Project will be the final deployment and the transition to production. The final
closeout will include the completion of eGMPS documentation, the DoIT closeout report and a
presentation to the DoIT Project Certification Committee for approval to formally close the
project.
77..22 CCOONNTTRRAACCTT CCLLOOSSEE
Contract close is similar to administrative close in that it involves product and process
verification for contract close.