efd stories 2015-2016
DESCRIPTION
EfD support poverty alleviation and sustainable development through the increased use of environmental economics in the policy making process.TRANSCRIPT
Environment for Development Initiative Stories of economic research applied
around the world.
STORIES2015/2016
1
Africa
EthIopIA Sustainable energy transitions to support the Climate-Resilient Green Economy Strategy. page 4
KEnyA Climate change is affecting food security. page 6
South AfRICA
taking ecosystem services to the policy table. page 8
tAnzAnIAStriking a balance between revenue generation and conservation in national parks. page 10
Asia
ChInABioenergy from crop residue can reduce coal consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. page 12
Latin America
CoStA RICA Conservation policies are effective in reducing deforestation and poverty. page 14 ChILE Bringing climate change to policy makers and communities. page 16
produced by the EfD Initiative
project management: Karin Jonson
texts: Dawit Woubishet (Ethiopia), Richard Mulwa
(Kenya), Leonie Joubert (South Africa), Salvatory
Macha (Tanzania), Yibo Wang (China), Eugenia León
(Central America), Felipe Vasquez Lavín (Chile)
Editing: Cyndi Berck, IAES
proofreading: Po-Ts’an Goh
Graphic Design: Anders Wennerström, Spiro
Kommunikation AB
Cover photo: NASA and European Space Agency
(ESA) nighttime photograph showing what man-made
light looks like from the International Space Station.
photo credits: Dawit Woubishet: page 5. Daniela
Linares and Alessandra Baltodano: pages 7, 11,
19. Karin Jonson: page 9 (top images). Ecoprint,
Shutterstock: page 9 (bottom). Edwin Muchapondwa:
page 10 (top). Cesar Ogasawara: page 13 (top). Istock:
page 13 (bottom). Daniela Linares: page 14. Laura
Villalobos: page 15 (bottom). Felipe Vásquez: page 17.
EfD Secretariat:
Department of Economics
School of Business, Economics and Law
University of Gothenburg
www.efdinitiative.org
facebook.com/EfDinitiative@EfD_initiative flickr: EfD Initiative
2
the Environment for Development Initiative (EfD) focuses on the decisions that people make about climate change and natural resources. We believe that natural resources and the environment are the basis for sustainable global development.
to achieve this, resources need to be managed in an efficient and equitable way with the support of high-quality research.
EfD is our network for cross-country research collaborations, research-policy interaction and academic training. We apply evidence-based analytical tools to design policies that effectively manage scarce resources. the gap between research and policy is bridged through maintaining a dialogue with local communities and policy makers. We want our research findings to have a real impact on poverty reduction by supporting truly sustainable development.
In September 2015, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), officially known as ‘transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’, were adopted at the un Sustainable Development Summit. these 17 goals are an intergovernmental set of aspirational goals with 169 targets. When presenting our stories, we relate all of them to one or more of the SDGs. We hope you enjoy our stories from EfD centers across the developing world.
united nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), officially known as transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
3
EfD IN EthIopIa
Sustainable energy transitions to support Ethiopia’s Climate-Resilient Green Economy Strategy
Ethiopia aims to build a green economy and to follow a growth path that fosters sustainable development. through the development of its Climate-Resilient Green Economy (CRGE) strategy, which is based on carbon-neutral growth, it envisions attaining middle-income status by 2025. Improving the productivity of the agricultural sector, protecting forests, expanding the coverage of electric power from renewable sources of energy and transitioning into modern and energy-efficient technologies are the main pillars of Ethiopia’s CRGE strategy.
Supporting the CRGE strategy through four programs
The Environment and Climate Research Center (ECRC),
hosted by the Ethiopian Development Research Insti-
tute, in partnership with EfD and the Global Green
Growth Institute, is one of the partners
supporting Ethiopia’s CRGE strategy
through research and devel-
opment. The center
aims to launch
four long-
term
programs: (i) Policy Research and Impact Evaluation (PRIE), (ii)
Policy interaction and communication, (iii) Data management and
knowledge repository, and (iv) Capacity building. The PRIE program,
around which the other three programs will be built, focuses on the
thematic areas of energy, industry, agriculture, forestry, water and
urbanization.
Focus on sustainable energy transition
The energy sector is central to the CRGE strategy. Low-carbon
energy can support green growth locally and has the potential to
develop alternative energy sources regionally, with the goals of
securing sources of income, contributing to development, and ulti-
mately decoupling the country’s economy from the fluctuating prices
and unsustainable nature of an oil-based economy. Ethiopia aspires
to become a renewable energy hub in East Africa by ensuring ac-
cess to affordable, clean and modern energy for all citizens by 2025.
Furthermore, the two phases of the Growth and Transformation Plan
have emphasized the energy sector, in an effort to meet energy de-
mand in the country by providing sufficient and reliable power, with
the further aims of exporting power to neighboring countries and
developing alternative sources of renewable energy.
At present, 85% of Ethiopian households are rural. Almost all of
these rural households use biomass fuel for cooking and only 5%
have access to electricity. This puts
the country at the bottom of the “en-
ergy ladder.” The “energy transition”
to clean fuels is at its early stage,
and the traditional fuel sources are
very carbon intensive. To address
Addis Ababa Light Rail opened in 2015. Photo: Francisco Anzola
4
these challenges, the two pillars of the CRGE strategy – expand-
ing electricity generation and increasing the use of energy-efficient
technologies – focus on energy transition and aim for massive
electrification in an effort to expand coverage to all regions by 2020.
The energy transition program has electric and non-electric energy
components, with the electric energy component further classified
as on-grid electric and off-grid energy programs. The non-electric
programs mainly focus on energy for cooking and aim at promoting
clean, energy-efficient cook stoves and expansion of biogas produc-
tion for households.
Workshop to identify knowledge gaps
In June 2015, ECRC organized a three-day international workshop
on a Sustainable Energy Transitions Initiative (SETI) to identify key
knowledge gaps and fundamental research questions on tradeoffs,
drivers and impacts of energy transitions. A series of discussions
have been held with relevant stakeholders (practitioners and re-
searchers) in the energy sector. On top of this, the PRIE team for en-
ergy is busy reviewing the economic literature and policy documents
to identify what is needed to implement sustainable energy transition
in Ethiopia. Demand for electrification and its impact, demand and
impact related to improved cook stoves, energy transition and ef-
fects of biofuel use are research themes identified under the PRIE
program that are crucial for the energy sector.
The energy team at ECRC informs policy makers in two ways. The
first approach is to generate evidence on the impacts of interventions
in electric energy and non-electric energy programs. The second line
is to study different ways of providing electricity and energy-efficient
technologies and to identify the most cost-effective approaches.
Four energy sub themes
The research theme related to demand for electrification and its
impact focuses on the adoption of electricity in grid-covered areas,
estimating demand and incentives to create a sustainable market for
solar technologies, as well as the socioeconomic impacts of different
electrification technologies (grid extension vs. solar home systems)
and economy-wide impacts of electrification programs on growth
and greenhouse gas emissions. The second theme emphasizes the
demand for improved cook stoves and the impact of this technol-
ogy. Specifically, ECRC addresses how social networks among rural
people affect technology adoption, how technologies spread to new
users, and the role of local forest institutions in the adoption of im-
proved biomass stoves and alternative fuel sources. The third theme
focuses on energy transition. It emphasizes households’ transition
from traditional fuel sources to modern and energy-efficient sources.
Specifically, we address the role of incentives in electric cook stove
adoption and biomass fuel consumption, the effects of sudden or
extreme energy price changes on energy demand, and households’
responsiveness to energy price inflation. The effects of biofuel use,
such as the impacts of biodiesel production on food security land
use, are addressed in the last theme. The ultimate objective of the
energy program at ECRC is to develop a research and strategic plan
for the next five years on sustainable energy transition in Ethiopia in
line with other cross-cutting issues of the PRIE program to support
the country’s CRGE strategy.
Researchers involved
Alemu Mekonnen, Sied Hassen, Abebe Damte, Amare Fentie, Yonas Alem, Gunnar
Köhlin, Subhrendu Pattanayak, Tensay Hadush and Zenebe Gebreegziabher.
References
“ECRC presented five-year research plan in high-level workshop.” http://www.
efdinitiative.org/ethiopia/news/l/ecrc-presented-five-year-research-plan-high-level-
workshop/4514
Sustainable Develpment Goals in focus
Images taken during a Controlled Cooking Test (CCT) at Awi Zone, Ethiopia. Left: An open fire stove. Middle: A baking stove. Right: An improved “injera” baking stove. (Injera is a yeast-risen flatbread made from teff flour).
5
EfD IN KENya
Climate change is affecting food security
A woman hoeing a vegetable garden in rural Kenya near Nairobi.
A recent study in Kenya shows that climate change and variability will increase food insecurity and that different food crops will respond differently to climate change variables. the study also highlights the different factors influencing food insecurity in a changing climate. this is important information for farmers as well as the government.
Climate change and climate variability affect weather patterns and
cause changes in historical patterns of seasonal temperature and
rain, on which farmers have long relied in making crop-planting
decisions. This is exerting pressures on agricultural systems and
threatening to significantly increase the number of people at risk
of food insecurity. This is especially true in regions where there
is over-reliance on rain-fed agriculture, high levels of poverty, low
levels of education, inadequate access to financial capital and poor
infrastructure.
More information about climate change impact is needed
In Kenya, the problem is further exacerbated by the fact that 80%
of total land cover is arid and semi-arid. Climate change is causing
harvest failure, deteriorating pasture conditions, decreased water
availability and livestock losses in both farming and pastoral com-
munities, especially in these regions. Therefore, information on how
different stakeholders can help manage the adverse impacts of cli-
mate change and reduce the threat of food insecurity is important in
tackling the climate change challenge. It is against this background
Woman farmer at the Nyando Climate Smart Villages, Kisumu, Nyanza, Kenya. Photo: K. Trautmann
6
that a research team led by the EfD Kenya Director, Prof Jane
Kabubo-Mariara, sought to address the link between climate change
and food insecurity in Kenya. This research was carried out on farm-
level data from the same households over a decade on yields of four
major crops (maize, beans, sorghum and millet), climate variables
(precipitation, temperature, runoff, and total cloud cover), population,
soil and agro-ecological zones data.
Food security and the climate change debate
This is not the first study to address climate change in Kenya,
but previous studies have concentrated on the impact of climate
change on crop and livestock productivity, and on adaptation to
climate change. However, the link between climate change and food
security in Kenya had not been explored. What Kabubo-Mariara and
her co-author did was to introduce an important dimension of food
security in the climate change and variability debate.
Their results have implications for all stakeholders, from farming
households to the government. First, they are important in informing
farming households, either directly or through their representatives –
community-based or non-governmental organizations, etc. – about
different technologies they can adopt in order to adapt to a changing
climate. These potentially include drought-resistant crops and live-
stock. At the government level, the results can be used to determine
the exact variables to be included in government strategies and
action plans to combat climate change and variability. These include
government-supported adaptation technologies, continuous climate
change monitoring, intensified early warning systems and dissemi-
nation of relevant information to farmers in order to ensure that they
adopt the appropriate adaption strategies.
Policy impact and the UN Sustainable Development Goals
The impact on policy from this research will be felt in both the short
and long run. This is because the research can assist policy makers
in drawing up and strengthening policies on adaptation to climate
change. This research can also help shape decisions that benefit
environmental development through interaction between academia
and policy makers. This study further enhances knowledge on ways
to improve food security, which is one of the main strategies for
poverty alleviation and sustainable development.
Further, the outcomes of this research support the second and
thirteenth UN Sustainable Development Goals, whose aims include
ending hunger and achieving food security and improved nutrition,
while promoting sustainable development and taking urgent action
to combat climate change and its impact.
Researchers involved
Jane Kabubo-Mariara, Millicent Kabara
References
Kabubo-Mariara, J. and M. Kabara. 2015. “Climate Change and Food Security in
Kenya.” EfD Discussion Paper 15-05.
Sustainable Develpment Goals in focus
Jane Kabubo-Mariara, Director, EfD Kenya.
7
EfD IN South afrIca
taking ecosystem services research to the policy table
It’s late on a hot December afternoon, and the discussion turns to whether or not game farmers in South Africa should be considered part of the conservation sector, or treated as farmers engaged in just another agricultural practice.
This conversation takes place among a group of about 12 people,
in a meeting room at the South African National Biodiversity Institute
(SANBI) offices in Cape Town, and the question matters for two
reasons.
The first is because the answer to that question determines what
national departments, and the associated regulations, will oversee
these ranchers’ practices. The second is because of the people in
the room who are asking the question.
Environmental Economics Policy Research Unit (EPRU) Direc-
tor, Dr Jane Turpie and EfD Senior Research Fellow Prof Edwin
Muchapondwa are leading the discussion with hand-picked rep-
resentatives from the national Department of Environmental Affairs
(DEA) and SANBI, the state-appointed body managing the country’s
biodiversity.
EPRU’s mandate is to do research relating to the economics of
environmental and natural resource management, which can inform
policy making in this country and across the region. The research-
ers, based at the University of Cape Town’s School of Economics,
face the twin challenges of marrying their research with the needs of
policy makers and getting evidence-based findings to them once the
research is done.
This workshop is the kind of face-to-face event that Turpie and the
EPRU team hope will stimulate a rolling conversation between this
EfD South Africa center and these two government agencies, which
are tasked with deciding how to manage the country’s environmen-
tal and natural resources.
Several key areas emerge during the day’s discussions: important
questions about the government’s ongoing efforts to understand the
impact of alien invasive species, and attempts to clear them; how to
handle the growing demand for medicinal plants harvested from the
wild by traditional healers; whether there’s a gap between govern-
ment environmental policies and their implementation; and more.
Ecosystem services: a key EPRU focus
EPRU’s work is geared toward influencing South African policy in
three key areas: climate change; the value of nature conservation
parks, biodiversity and ecosystem services; and marine fisheries.
This year saw the team strengthen its research in the area of ecosys-
tem services in several ways: by launching related research projects,
writing up the findings in various papers and formats, and presenting
their results at conferences and in workshops.
Turpie says their job is to produce policy-relevant research that is
Kogelberg Mountains and South Atlantic Ocean. Photo: Christopher Griner
8
geared toward solving problems faced on the ground, rather than
just offering theory. In terms of the focus on ecosystem services, the
team still has plenty of work ahead of it, but they have made impor-
tant strides this year, in terms of gauging the demand for research
linked to the economics of ecosystem services, and where they can
use this to advise key decision makers.
Research geared toward assisting policy makers across southern
Africa includes Dr Susan Snyman’s study of the economic benefits
of ecotourism for rural communities, which looks at high-end lodges
across six southern African countries. Meanwhile, Prof Muchapond-
wa’s analysis of the cost of entering national parks in South Africa,
Botswana and Tanzania can inform environmental departments in
all of those countries to structure their park entry fees appropriately
for local and international tourists. SANBI’s Director of Biodiversity
Policy, Ms Mandy Driver, is working with the United Nations through
EPRU to help draw up a standardized approach to environmental
accounting for the region. This work is toward Ms Driver’s doctoral
research.
Their work also zooms down to the city scale, and can be useful
for municipal managers. For instance, two studies have looked at
the value of urban green spaces in Durban, on the South African
east coast, and in Kampala, the capital of Uganda.
The economic benefits of preserving the region’s
biodiversity
EPRU researchers have shown that parks and other green belts in
Durban push up the value of surrounding properties, and that this
can be a boon for municipalities, which can then ask for higher rates
on those homes. Meanwhile, another study has shown that, if de-
graded wetlands are restored in Kampala – a city which has very few
natural recreational spaces – it could have significant economic and
recreational benefits for the people of the city. Residents currently
have to drive several hours from the capital in order to find natural
recreational spaces.
Calculating the “amenity” value of nature – in these two cities, as
well as in other areas like the Kogelberg coastline near Cape Town –
suggests that municipalities, conservationists and development plan-
ners should consider the potential of the beauty of nature as a money-
spinner because of their local tourism and recreational potential.
These are just some of the examples of how this team of environ-
mental economists is trying to highlight the economic benefits of
preserving the region’s biodiversity and healthy, functioning environ-
mental systems.
Dr Turpie concluded the December workshop addressing these
key SANBI and DEA representatives by reflecting on the importance
of EPRU informing these institutions about precisely what it is that en-
vironmental economists do, and what their methods are, in order for
them to appreciate the value of the research findings EPRU offers.
Researchers involved
Edwin Muchapondwa, Susan Snyman, Jane Turpie, Johane Dikgang, Herbert Ntuli
References
Ntuli, H. and E. Muchapondwa. 2015. “A Bioeconomic Analysis of Community
Wildlife Conservation in Zimbabwe.” EfD Discussion Paper Series 15-28.
Snyman, S. 2014. “Partnership between a private sector ecotourism operator and
a local community in the Okavango Delta, Botswana: the case of the Okavango
Community Trust and Wilderness Safaris.” Journal of Ecotourism 13(2-3): 110-127.
Turpie, J. and J. de Wet. “Economic Value of the Kogelberg Coast, Western Cape,
South Africa.” 2015. EfD Discussion Paper 15-30.
Sustainable Develpment Goals in focus
Should farming with wildlife, like these wildebeest, be governed by South Africa’s conservation policies or agriculture?
Mandy Driver, Director of Biodiversity Policy, SANBI and Jane Turpie, Director EPRU, at UCT. Edwin Muchapondwa, EfD Senior Research Fellow, UCT.
9
EfD IN taNzaNIa
Striking a balance between revenue generation and environmental conservation
in national parks
national parks have long been the most common approach to biodiversity conservation. however, there are often tradeoffs between support for biodiversity and other social goals that rely on government revenue for primary funding and subsidies. As a result, governments in poor countries cannot afford to fully finance conservation due to budgetary limitations. this imposes pressure on park managers to find alternative financing mechanisms.
“As much as we need the revenue to finance parks main-
tenance and other government activities,
still we have the mandate to ensure that the
environment is conserved,” said Mr Gerald
Kibira, EfD Tanzania Junior Research Fellow,
during his presentation of the research findings
on an optimal park pricing study involving national
parks in Kenya (Maasai Mara), Tanzania (Serengeti)
and South Africa (Kruger). He was speaking at a
park pricing final paper workshop organized at
Kruger National Park (KNP). The workshop
involved EfD researchers from South Africa, Tanzania and Kenya.
Others were researchers, ecologists, park wardens and the man-
agement team from KNP.
Increased competition for government spending – a threat
to national parks
National parks in Africa mostly rely on fiscal transfers from the state
to fund their conservation activities. Increased demand for govern-
ment spending on other sectors has increased the competition for
funds for national parks conservation and threatens the existence of
national parks and other protected areas.
Preliminary findings in the Serengeti National Park show
that the maximum entrance fee that visitors
are willing to pay stands at USD 125, while
the current entrance fee is USD 50. Around
175,000 tourists visited Serengeti National
Park in 2012/13. Entrance fees can be used for
improving conservation and infrastructure at the
park, as well as for other public services. However,
only some visitors are willing and able to pay USD 125,
meaning the park would lose too many visitors, and revenue
would end up decreasing. According to the study, the fee
Photo taken during park pricing workshop in Kruger National Park.
10
increase that is acceptable to a large enough number of visitors is
around USD 7 and thus the park authorities could raise the entry fee
to USD 57.
“Serengeti National Park is facing the challenge of limited revenue
generation for operational costs and park maintenance,” said Mr
Godlisten Kimaro, Tourism Warden at Serengeti National Park. In
addition, there are limits to both domestic tourism and sustainable
foreign tourism due to global security concerns and financial crises.
Adjacent villages assist in protection of the wildlife
Poaching is another major challenge facing the Serengeti. With
limited resources, effective and continuous surveillance has been
difficult to implement. “The park welcomes the Wildlife Management
Areas (WMAs) arrangement with great enthusiasm,” said Mr Kimaro.
This is an arrangement in which villages own, maintain and protect
portions of the park that are adjacent to their villages. As a result,
they assist in protection of the wildlife and other biodiversity.
Timely research findings to influence park pricing in
Tanzania
Environment for Development Tanzania (EfDT) has shared their
preliminary findings with Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA) as part
of the center’s policy interaction with stakeholders and policy mak-
ers. “These are really timely research findings, given that TANAPA is
strategizing to adjust its entrance fees,” said Mr Kimaro. He added
“the main challenge is striking the balance between the objective of
income generation for park maintenance and government financing
of social services and environmental protection.”
In view of this, EfDT organized a workshop in February 2016,
in which the research findings for the optimal park pricing were
presented and discussed with the key stakeholders. “In the 2015/16
EfDT work plan, it is envisaged to conduct a key stakeholder work-
shop to disseminate research findings,” said Dr Razack Lokina, EfDT
Center Director. He added “one of the workshops is on park pricing,
in which the research findings for Maasai Mara, Kruger and Seren-
geti will be disseminated.”
The collaborative research on optimal park pricing involved data
collection by interviewing foreign tourists in the Serengeti, Maasai
Mara and Kruger National Parks. “The concern about instituting
optimal park pricing was noted and positively welcomed by all the
tourists who were interviewed,” said Dr Stephen Kirama, EfDT Re-
search Fellow and the coordinator of the field work for the Serengeti
National Park. “Our expectation is that you don’t lower the fees to
overpopulate the parks, but also you don’t inflate them so high that
you depopulate it,” noted a German visitor to the Serengeti.
EfDT is considering the findings from the park pricing research as a
major breakthrough to ensure sustainable income generation for the
Serengeti as well as for the maintenance of the Serengeti ecosystem.
Another milestone of interaction between researchers
and policy makers
“For EfDT, the optimal park pricing study is another achievement that
promotes interaction between the center and the key policy makers
in Tanzania” said Prof. Lokina, adding that, at the moment when the
5th Phase Government is strategizing on increasing government
revenue, the research findings offer a key avenue to open up yet
another source of income through tourism.
“The remaining challenge is still to boost the dwindling domestic
tourism,” said Dr Kirama, adding that it is very important for the
Ministry of Tourism and Natural Resources to widen awareness
campaigns and promote park visits in order to boost domestic
tourism. The best way is to start with special awareness campaigns
for schools, colleges and other institutions, as well as promotional
subsidized park tours during the low seasons in order to curb the
revenue gap resulting from low levels of foreign tourism during those
seasons.
While EfDT is proud of the preliminary research findings on
optimal park pricing, there is still much more to be done on related
areas, such as alternative park financing, improvement of park infra-
structure, poaching of endangered species and involvement of the
neighboring communities in protection of the natural wealth for both
income generation and intergenerational heritage.
Gerald Kibira, EfD Tanzania Junior Research Fellow.
Researchers involved
Gerald Kibira, Stephen Kirama
References
“The structure and level of entrance fees in Serengeti National Park in Tanzania” by
Gerald Kibira (paper under review)
Sustainable Develpment Goals in focus
11
EfD IN chINa
Bioenergy from crop residue can reduce coal consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
China’s booming economy needs energy. fortunately, agricultural waste offers the potential for relatively clean energy. that’s the conclusion of EfD China’s study on the potential to turn corn, wheat and rice crop residue into bioenergy.
“China’s demand for energy has increased more than four-fold dur-
ing the past 30 years, with coal being the primary energy source,”
explained researcher Dr Xiaoguang Chen. “Over-reliance on coal has
led to China becoming the world’s largest emitter of sulfur dioxide and
greenhouse gases, with serious effects on health as well as climate.
These problems motivated my study of the potential of bioenergy.”
While biomass will not entirely replace coal in the foreseeable fu-
ture, it can significantly reduce the use of coal, Dr Chen explained. It
is possible to add biomass into the fuel mix at power plants that are
currently coal-fired, a process known as “co-firing.” This approach
could improve urban air quality while reducing carbon emissions that
affect climate change.
Rice, wheat and corn can reduce coal consumption
“If crop residues can be effectively utilized, China can significantly
reduce coal consumption and improve air quality,” continued Dr
Chen. His study looked at crop waste in some detail, at the county
level, to evaluate how much renewable energy can be produced
from cellulosic biomass. Cellulosic biomass can be derived from ag-
A cyclist wears a mask to reduce inhaling polluted urban air in Beijing. Photo: Shutterstock
12
Researchers involved
Xiaoguang Chen
References
Chen, Xiaoguang. 2015. “Assessment of the Potential Biomass Supply from Crop
Residues in China.” EfD Discussion Paper Series 15-06
Chen, Xiaoguang. In press. “Economic Potential of Biomass Supply from Crop
Residues in China.” Applied Energy.
Jiang, D., Zhuang, D., Fu, J., Huang, Y., and Wen, K. 2012. “Bioenergy Potential
from Crop Residues in China: Availability and Distribution.” Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Review 16: 1377-82.
Sustainable Develpment Goals in focus
ricultural sources, such as crop residues and perennial grasses, as
well as forest sources, such as forest residues and woody biomass.
Crop residues mainly include corn stover (waste), wheat straw, and
rice straw. As compared to the fossil fuels that they can displace,
cellulosic biomass can offer greater potential for various environ-
mental benefits.
Farmers need incentives to collect crop residues for
bioenergy purposes
However, farmers need incentives to harvest this residue for pur-
poses of bioenergy. “Our analysis shows that China could produce
up to 250 million metric tons of crop residues annually if a biomass
price of USD 100 per metric ton made this profitable,” explained
Dr Chen. Rice straw is likely to be the main biomass type in China,
representing about 47% of total residue production, while corn sto-
ver can potentially contribute 28% and wheat straw can potentially
contribute 25%, according to his research.
A longer-term goal is to maximize bioenergy production. To create
the incentives for Chinese farmers to begin collecting crop residues
for bioenergy purposes, biomass prices of USD 40-70 per metric ton
would be required, depending on production costs of crop residues
and residue collection technology.
To encourage farmers to harvest crop residues for bioenergy
production, the Chinese government should target areas with high
yields and low costs for producing corn, wheat and rice, concluded
Dr Chen. With the estimated large amount of crop residues, China
has great potential to reduce reliance on coal and improve urban air
quality by co-firing agricultural biomass with coal at coal-fired power
plants.
Rice straw. Photo: Cesar Ogasawara
A coal-fired power plant. Photo: Istock
13
Conservation policies are effective in reducing deforestation and poverty
Costa Rica originally had a territory almost entirely covered by natural forests. By 1960, forest coverage was reduced to 60%. the high rate of deforestation in the following decades accelerated this process. In the 1980s, forest coverage was only 41%. however, in recent decades, this trend has changed. A restoration process started, with the goal of a forest cover equivalent to 52.4% of the country.
A System of Protected Areas (SPAs) started in the 1970s with the
establishment of national parks, biological reserves and other cat-
egories of protection. Now, protected areas cover about 44% of the
forest area, while the remaining 56% is private property which is also
regulated under the Forestry Act of 1996. Economists call the SPAs
a policy of “command and control,” where the government sets rules
instead of providing incentives. By contrast, Payments for Environ-
mental Services (PES) is a market instrument, and is the leading
conservation policy for private property in Costa Rica. PES started
in 1997. By 2014, 46,400 hectares, equivalent to 1% of the country,
were added to the program.
EfD researchers called upon to document impact of PES
for State of Nation program
Researchers Dr Juan Robalino and Ms Laura Villalobos of EfD
Central America (EfD-CA) were called upon as part of Costa Rica’s
State of the Nation Program to document evidence of the impact of
protected areas and payments for environmental services on forest
conservation. The State of the Nation Program is an annual report
intended to improve citizen access to information about public af-
fairs. Its slogan is “Know the Costa Rica we have and think about
the Costa Rica we want,” and it reports on national performance
and trends in sustainable human development. Its main audience
consists of policy makers, researchers and academia, but it’s also a
public access document for any interested parties.
EfD IN cENtral amErIca
Juan Robalino, EfD Central America Senior Research Fellow. Laura Villalobos, EfD Central America Research Fellow and PhD Student.
14
Which policies are more effective?
The work done this year by Dr Robalino and Ms Villalo-
bos helped identify which policies are more effective in reducing
deforestation, and under what conditions. Their research also
permits refining or modifying the design of policies to generate
greater impacts or to generate the desired impacts with lower
costs, as has been done in previous years when EfD-CA
researchers worked with the Forestry Financing Fund of
Costa Rica (FONAFIFO) on the design and improvement
of PES.
This work fits into Costa Rica’s development
model. Since 1990, conservation policies have been
founded on a system of national parks, which have
allowed Costa Rica to set up a tourism model based
on conserving the natural environment. Reducing
deforestation is part of this model. The study concluded that
the policy of conservation through protected areas was effective in
reducing deforestation on land within these areas. However, while
deforestation in adjacent private areas is also reduced by the SPAs,
this effect is very small.
Does conservation of protected areas have social costs?
The researchers also asked, “Does conservation through the
implementation of protected areas have a social cost?” These results
suggest that the effect of the expansion or creation of new protected
areas depends on the ability of communities to find alternative
sources of income. They also emphasize that the design of protected
areas can make a difference in the socioeconomic impacts. Policies
that promote tourism in protected areas will enhance the positive
effects of conservation around these areas.
“If protected areas encourage the development of complementary
tourism activities and/or increase the level of environmental aware-
ness among the nearby residents, the protective effect could spread
to surrounding areas,” Robalino and Villalobos stated.
One of the highlighted results of this study is that “there is no evidence
that poverty has increased, on average, in areas surrounding pro-
tected areas. Rather, there is an effect of
reducing poverty and increasing wages
of those who are located near access to
national parks,” stated Robalino and Villalobos
in the State of the Nation Program presentation.
The evidence so far leads to the following conclu-
sions published by Dr Robalino and Ms Villalobos in
the State of the Nation 2015 Report:
• The protected areas have managed to avoid
deforestation within their boundaries.
• Significant reductions in deforestation in areas
adjacent to national parks are observed.
• The additional conservation generated by protected areas
does not imply a social cost. There is no evidence that poverty
has increased on average in areas surrounding protected areas.
• The complementarity between tourism and national parks
generates positive socioeconomic outcomes for com-
munities. It could encourage tourism in the areas sur-
rounding the parks that are less visited.
• The protected area program design has
managed to curb deforestation.
In the early years of implementation, the PSA program had a limited
role in reducing deforestation nationwide. However, for the period
2000-2005, reductions in deforestation due to the program doubled.
In general, Robalino and Villalobos concluded that conservation
policies have helped maintain and restore forest cover and this has
not meant an increase in the poverty of local communities. However,
there is room to increase the positive impacts of these policies.
Researchers involved
Juan Robalino and Laura Villalobos
References
State of the Nation Report, Costa Rica, 2015
Sustainable Develpment Goals in focus
Carrillo National Park in Costa Rica.
15
Bringing climate change to policy makers and communities
the economy of the Vergara River Basin in Chile is highly vulnerable to changes in water availability. the most vulnerable groups are poor indigenous populations and small farmers. Substantial reallocation of water between farmers and households is needed, and is made possible with the Vergara hydroeconomic Model. this project has created a bridge between scientific research and policy makers who need this information to design and evaluate adaptation strategies.
Some of the most relevant impacts of climate change in Chile are
associated with changes in water availability for agriculture, house-
holds’ consumption (both urban and rural), and industry. Climate
change scenarios suggest that water resources will diminish in most
agricultural zones within the country, imposing significant social
costs that will be unevenly distributed among the population.
In this context, members of EfD Chile, together with almost 20
researchers from Universidad del Desarrollo and Universidad de
Concepción, developed a three-year project supported by the
International Development Research Centre (IDRC, Canada), entitled
“Welfare and Economic Evaluation of Climatic Change Impacts on
Water Resources at River Basin Scale.” The project was led by EfD
researcher Dr Felipe Vásquez Lavín and was implemented in three
Latin American basins: Vergara River (Chile), Chinchiná River (Co-
lombia), and Piraí River (Bolivia).
Interdisciplinary approach
Using an interdisciplinary perspective, the researchers
analyzed the changes in water availability due to climate
change and its associated impacts on both the
economy and the population. They com-
bined a hydrological model, water demand
models for different users, and a geographic
information system in order to estimate the
economic and social impact of changes in water
availability. The study aimed to quantify the relation-
ship among the expected climate change impacts, population
growth, changes in land use, carbon sequestration, and the quality
of life of the basins’ inhabitants. Finally, the study identified the most
efficient adaptation options and the associated institutional changes
needed to cope with the expected impacts of climate change.
Reallocation of water use
The major conclusion of this study is that the Vergara River Basin
economy is highly vulnerable to changes in water availability. The
project identified substantial reallocation of water between farmers
and households and showed that the most vulnerable groups are
poor indigenous populations and small farmers. For example, the
researchers found that, at the basin level, water is being reallocated
from agriculture to household uses, and, within the agricultural
sector, the water is being reallocated from fruits to cereals. This
reallocation is driven by differences in the value of water in one use
relative to another.
The Vergena Hydroeconomic model
The main output of the project is the Vergara Hydroeconomic
Model (VHM). This is a computer model that can be used for policy
assessment because it allows for a rigorous economic analysis of
climate change impacts on water availability and shows where these
impacts are located. We have developed the VHM with separate
modules for each part of the analysis (hydrological, economic, and
social) so that this tool can be easily replicated in other basins.
Results are reaching society
We have participated in several meetings with private
and public institutions, in Chile and abroad, that have
been interested in our results. Some of these institu-
tions have requested our expertise for their ongoing
projects, including the Ministry of Environment,
Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Finance, Re-
gional Ministry of Environment, National Corpora-
tion of Forest (CONAF), mining companies
and water utility companies.
At the local level, our research team
EfD IN chIlE
16
was invited by the Presidential Water Delegate to the Regional Government of
the Araucanía Region to contribute scientific support for a broad initiative to
set up a “water dialogue roundtable” within the basin. We used our results to
motivate stakeholders to participate in this initiative, and we will use the VHM
model to evaluate different public policies and adaptation strategies that can
arise from this dialogue. Furthermore, we received funding from the Ministry
of Economy to increase climate change awareness within local communities,
with a special focus on secondary schools. Together with local authorities, we
implemented an information campaign about the expected impacts of climate
change. This project included workshops with communities, including govern-
ment, indigenous groups, and farmers, and it aimed to inform them not only
about the results of the project, but also about the institutional framework that
governs water resources in Chile.
Workshops with secondary schools
Other workshops were targeted at secondary schools. Students were invited
to discuss their ideas about issues such as the river basin, water resources
as a key element for life (and also for the economy), climate change, and their
expectations about the vulnerability of their communities. Additionally, a multi-
disciplinary team helped them build a representation of the Vergara River Basin
using cardboard boxes, in which they were able to actually see how the water
flows within the basin, the relationships across water users, and the external
effects of water consumption.
At the national level, we were invited by the Ministry of Environment to esti-
mate the economic value of water, aimed at the inclusion of water resources
within the national accounting system (“green accounting”). We provided
figures for the economic value of water for different economic sectors, includ-
ing residential, agricultural, industrial, and recreational. Finally, we are provid-
ing research support to evaluate the use of economic instruments for water
resources management in the Villarrica Lake, located in the project region.
Secondary school students building a model of the Vergara River Basin using cardboard boxes.
Researchers involved
Felipe Vásquez Lavín, Roberto Ponce Oliva, Sergio Orrego Suaza, Alejandra Sthern, Diego
Rivera, Francisco Fernandez, Alfredo Saldaña, Eduardo Letelier, Alejandra Chovar, Leonardo
Vargas, Dario Felipe Jimenez
References
Fernandez, F., R. Ponce, M. Blanco, D. Rivera, and F. Vásquez-Lavín. 2016. “Water Scarcity and
the Economic Impacts on Small-Scale Farmers at Basin Level: A Risk-Based Hydroeconomic
Modelling Approach.” Water Resources Management http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/
s11269-016-1227-8
Ponce, R., F. Vásquez, and S. Orrego. 2015. Gestión y Valoración de Riesgos Climáticos a
Escala de Cuenca: Propuestas desde la Cuenca del Río Vergara. Chile. Edited by ECLAC, Chile.
Sustainable Develpment Goals in focus
Close-up of the students’ models of the river basin.
17
the EfD impact model
Create platforms fo
r interactio
n
Tailor research
results
for t
arge
t group
s
Co-production of
knowle
dge
EfD research fund
Collaborative researc
h
Infrastructure and staff investments
Mutual learning within the network
PhD and Msc program support to centersPhD Program in Climate Econom
icsat University of Gothenburg
PhD specialization co
urses
Capacity gap
There are too few environmental economists in developing countries
to carry out the necessary analysis of causes of and solutions to
environmental problems.
Analytical gap
Too little analysis is carried out on environmental management for
sustainable inclusive growth.
Communications and policy interaction gap
Even the knowledge that is created seldom makes it to the relevant
policy processes.
Institutional gap
There is often no platform where researchers can be matched with
resources to meet policy challenges. Similarly, academic institutions
in developing countries lack the resources and infrastructure needed
to support knowledge based policies.
Gaps and solutions
EfD program design builds on the premise that there are four important gaps that prevent research
from permeating into policy processes in the developing world. Our program responds to these
gaps with mutually reinforcing program components for policy impact.
18
Climate change and scarcity of natural resources affect all aspects
of society, from the local to the global level. When facing the biggest
challenges of our time, the role of research is to provide reliable,
evidence-based knowledge for wise decisions.
Our response as environmental economists is to analyze and design
policies to manage climate change and to use natural resources in
an efficient and sustainable way for the benefit of people today and
future generations. For more than 25 years, we have built environ-
mental economics capacity globally, through the Environmental Eco-
nomics Program, managed by the Environmental Economics Unit at
the Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg.
The establishment of the EfD Centers over the past decade has
been a collaboration among alumni, colleagues and partners in Cen-
tral America, Chile, China, Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, Sweden,
Tanzania and the USA. Three more EfD centers are in the process of
setting up during 2016, in India, Vietnam and Colombia.
We are proud that the EfD Initiative is run jointly with high-quality
universities and research institutes in low and middle income coun-
tries, as well as with Resources for the Future in the US, the world’s
leading academic think-tank in environmental and natural resource
economics.
Sida, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency,
provides core funding for the EfD Initiative.
Find out more
www.efdinitiative.org
Follow us on
Twitter: @EfD_initiative
Facebook.com/EfDinitiative
Flickr: EfD Initiative
Co-production of
knowle
dge
EfD research fund
Collaborative researc
h
19
EfD in Sweden
Environmental Economics Unit (EEU), Department of
Economics, University of Gothenburg
Vasagatan 1, Bldg E, PO Box 640
SE 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
Leader: Prof. Thomas Sterner
Tel: +46 31 786 4177
EfD in Tanzania
Department of Economics, University of Dar es Salaam
College of Social Sciences (CoSS) Tower Block, 3rd Floor
PO Box 35045, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Tel: +255 22 241 0162 or +255 22 241 0252
Director: Prof. Razack Lokina
www.efdinitiative.org/tanzania
EfD in the United States
Resources for the Future (RFF)
1616 P St. NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA
Director, RFF’s EfD Center: Dr. Allen Blackman
Tel: +1 202 328 5073
www.efdinitiative.org/rff
www.rff.org
EfD in Ethiopia
Environment and Climate Research Center (ECRC)
Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI)
Rm 401, 402, 408 and 409 Road and Transport Authority,
Blue Building, near National Stadium PO Box 2479,
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Director: Dr. Haileselassie Medhin
Tel: +251 11 550 6066/+251 11 553 8632
www.efdinitiative.org/ethiopia
EfD in Kenya
School of Economics, University of Nairobi
Harry Thuku Road, PO Box 30197-00100
Nairobi, Kenya
Director: Prof. Jane Kabubo-Mariara
Tel: +254 20 318 262, +254 20 226 451 ext. 28122
www.efdinitiative.org/kenya
EfD in South Africa
Environmental-Economics Policy Research Unit (EPRU)
University of Cape Town, School of Economics
Private Bag 7701, Rondebosch, South Africa
Director: Dr. Jane Turpie
Tel: +21 21 701 3420
www.efdinitiative.org/south-africa
EfDEnvironment for Development
Ethiopian Development Research Institute
EfD in Central America
Research Program in Economics and Environment for
Development (EEfD/IDEA), Tropical Agricultural Research
and Higher Education Center (CATIE)
CATIE 7170, Turrialba 30501, Cartago, Costa Rica
Director: Dr. Francisco Alpízar
Tel: +506 2558 2624
www.efdinitiative.org/central-america
EfD in Chile
Research Nucleus on Environmental and Natural Resource
Economics (NENRE)
Department of Economics, Universidad de Concepción
Victoria 471, Barrio Universitario 4070374 Concepción, CH
Director: Prof. Carlos Chávez
Tel: + 56 41 220 4503
www.efdinitiative.org/chile
EfD in China
Environmental Economics Program in China (EEPC)
National School of Development, Peking University
Beijing 100871, China
Director: Prof. Jintao Xu
Tel: +86 10 62767657
www.efdinitiative.org/china
EfD in India
Centre for Research on the Economics of Climate, Food,
Energy and Environment (CECFEE),
Indian Statistical Institute (ISI)
7 S.J.S. Sansanwal Marg, New Delhi 110 016, India
Director: Dr. Mudit Kapoor
EfD in Vietnam
School of Economics, University of Economics Ho Chi
Minh City, 1A Hoang Dieu Street, Phu Nhuan District, Ho
Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Director: Dr. Pham Khánh Nam
EfD in Colombia
The Research Group on Environment, Natural Resources
and Applied Economics Studies (REES)
Universidad de los Andes
Director: Dr. Jorge Bonilla
MAIN DONOR Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
MAIN PARTNER