eff: breadymotion
TRANSCRIPT
8/14/2019 EFF: breadymotion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-breadymotion 1/4
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
l l
t2
13
t4
15
T6t7
18
l9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
GRTFFINWHITAKERLLPJOSHUAGRAEME WHITAKER(Appearing ursuanto MDL Rule1.4 U.S.Dist. Ct. for
the Dist. of Md. BarNo. 164571)j oshuawhitaker@griffiwhitaker. om
EDWARD NELSONGRIFFIN(Appearing ursuanto MDL Rule 1.4 U.S.Dist. Ct. for
theDist.of Md. BarNo. 164351)edwardgriffin@griffi nwhitaker. om
8730GeorgiaAvenueSuiteLL100SilverSpring,MD 20910Telephone: (301)587-3345Facsimile: (888)367-0383Attorneysor PlaintiffsChristopherBready,t al.
T]NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
26
27
28
NATIONAL SECURITYAGENCYTELECOMMLTNICATIONSECORDSLITIGATION
This DocumentRelates o:
Bready,et al. v. VerizonMaryland, nc.UnitedStatesDistrict Court or theDistrict of MarylandCase o. 1:06-2185
MDL DocketNo. 06-1791 RW
Relateso CaseNo. 3:06-3596andRelateso CaseNo. 3:06-3574
BREADYPLAINTIFFS'MOTION FORADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
Courtroom ,l7h FloorJudge:Hon. VaughnR. Walker
[Civ.L.R.7-11]
BREADYPLAINTIFFS' MOTION FORADMINISTRATWE RELIEF
MDL DocketNo. 06-01791-VRW
Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW Document 94 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 4
8/14/2019 EFF: breadymotion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-breadymotion 2/4
I
2
J
4
)
6
7
8
9
10
11
l2
t3
l4
l5
t6
t7
18
l9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuanto Civil L.R. 7-11,PlaintiffsCHRISTOPHER BREADY, er a/.
(hereinafter Plaintiffs"), do herebymove his Court o grant hemadministrative elief,
respectfully equesting hat this Court ssueanorder o showcauseas o why theCourt's
resolution f theremandmotionsof Campbell, t al. v. AT&T Communicationsf
Califurnia,nc.,CaseNo. 3:06-3596N.D.Cal.) hereinafter'Campbelf'),andRiordan,
etal. v. VerizonCommunications,nc., et al., CaseNo. 3:06-3574N.D.Cal.)
(hereinaftetRiordan"),scheduledor hearing nDecember l'1,2006,shouldnot be
appliedo the remandmotionpendingn Bready,etal. v. VerizonMaryland, nc.,Case
No. 1 06-2185D.Md.)(hereinafterBreadlf') BreadyDkt. I5).
I. ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF REQUESTED
Plaintiffs requesthat he Court ssuean order o showcause s o why the
Court'sOrder egardinghe remandmotionsof CampbellandRiordanshouldnotapply
to the Bready emandmotion.
II. REASONSADMINISTRATIVB RELIEF IS SOUGHT
Plaintiffs espectflrlly tate hat he administrativeelief sought ereinwill help
avoidprejudiceo their action,andwill firrtherudicialefficiency. TheBreadyaction s
oneof only fotr actions,ncludingCampbell,Riordan,andChuslky, tal. v. Cellco
Portnership,No. 06-cv-2530D.N.J.),hathavebeen ransferredo this Courtandhave
remandmotionspendingesponse ndor udicial resolution. n early2007, his Court's
Civil MinuteOrder,asamendednNovember17,2006, equireshat masteromplaints
be filed and servedby theplaintifls; importantly, his Court will also determinewhether
theUnited StatesGovemment's equest or astay n theMDL action shouldbegranted.
(MDL l79l Dkt.78). ThePlaintiffs,asMarylandstate esidentseeking tatelaw
BREADYPLAINTIFFS'MOTION FORADMINISTRATIVERELIEF
MDL DocketNo. 06-01791-VRW
Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW Document 94 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 2 of 4
8/14/2019 EFF: breadymotion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-breadymotion 3/4
I
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
I
9
l0
l l
t2
13
I4
15
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2l
) )
23
24
25
26
27
28
remedies gainst Marylandcorporation, ish o have heir urisdictionalssues esolved
prior to thoseevents,n order o avoidprejudicialdelay o theprosecution f theiraction,
aswell asurmecessaryostsof participation n federal itigation.
Furthermore,he administrative elief soughtherein urthersudicial efficiency.
Becausemanyof the samessuesaised n the Bready emandmotioncouldbe
effectively esolved y this Courtonor immediatelyollowing he hearingon the 2l't of
December, nly limitedsupplemental riefing wouldberequired o addresshe ssuesof
Maryland aw,which distinguish heBreadyaction fromCampbellandRiordan,prior to
a hearingonthis matter.
III. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing easons, laintiffs respectfully equesthatthe administrative
relief soughthereinbegranted,and hat this Court ssuean Order o ShowCause n
writing as o why the CampbellandRiordanremandOrdershouldnotapply to Bready.
DATED: December 9.2006
/SIGNED/JOSHUAnnrrrlPWrurarpn(U.S.Dist.Ct. for theDist.of Md. BarNo. 16457)j oshuawhitaker@riffi nwhitaker. omEDWARDNELSONGRIFFIN(U.S.Dist.Ct. orthe Dist.of Md.BarNo.l6435)edward riffin@gri fi nwhitaker. om8730GeorgiaAvenueSuiteLL100SilverSpring,MD 20910Telephone: (301)587-3345Facsimile: (888)367-0383Attorneys or Plaintiffs ChristopherBready,et al.
J
MDL Docket o.06-01791-VRw BREADIPLAINTIFFS'oTIoN FoRADMINISTRATWE ELIEF
Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW Document 94 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 3 of 4
8/14/2019 EFF: breadymotion
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eff-breadymotion 4/4
1
2
-)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
t2
l3
l4
15
t6
l7
18
l9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DocketNumber 6-1 91VRW
CERTIFICATEOF COMPLAINCEWITH CIV. L.R. 7-I2
I, JoshuaGraemeWhitaker, heundersigred,do herebydeclareand stateas
follows:
l. I am over18andnot aparty o thiscase. amapartnerat the irm of
Griffin Whitaker LLP.
2. My businessddresss 8730Georgia venue,SuiteLLl00, SilverSpring,
Maryland,20910.
3. On hemomingof December9th, 006, t 10:20 .M. local ime,
attemptedo contactMr. SamirJain,counselor VerizonMaryland, nc.,via telephone,
in order o obtainconsento the Plaintiffs'MOTION FORADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF. At that time, I left a detailedvoicemail or Mr. Jain regardinghe matters
assertedherein.At approximately:30P.M. ocal ime, againattemptedo contactMr.
Jain egardinghismattervia electronicmail,and eceived responseromhis associate,
Mr. Brian Boynton.Thematterwasdiscussedn two telephoneonversations,t the
conclusion f which Mr. Boynton,on behalfof Defendant, idnot consento the relief
soughtn the oregoingmotion.
I declareunder hepenaltyof perjurythatthe foregoing s true.
DATED: December9.2006
*
(U.S.Dist.Ct. for the Dist.of Md. BarNo. 16457)j oshuawhitaker@ri fi nwhitaker. om8730GeorgiaAvenueSuiteLL100SilverSpring,MD 20910Telephone: (301)587-3345Facsimile: (888)367-0383Attorney or PlaintiffsChristopherBready,t al.
4MDL DocketNo. 06-01791-VRw BREADIPLAINTIFFS'MoTIoN FoR
ADMINISTRATIVERELIEF
Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW Document 94 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 4 of 4