EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CLOZAPINE ON BASAL AND STIMULATED MEDIAL PREFRONTAL GABA RELEASE IN TWO

RAT MODELS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA

Ocular Implants – Vision For The Future A view on why implants are currently the most effective treatment for chronic

diseases of the eyeAdedoyin Awodele, Faye Carrington, Alanna Cavanagh, Constance Gaya Cremers, Sarah Killeen, Melissa

MacPherson.Pharmacology, UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Why Implants?

What are they?•.Usually made of polymers that release a drug over a prolonged period of time. There are two types:

• Provide sustained drug delivery to the posterior or anterior segment of the eye.

• Localised drug delivery, therefore reduced dose.

• Can be applied to various ocular layers depending on disease: subconjuctival/intravitreal/intrasceral.

• Implants reduce frequency of administration and the risk of side effects.

• Minimise the importance of patient compliance.

Above: Insertion of RetisertRef: http://medgadget.com/2009/02/eye_implant_prevents_lost_vision.html

Ocular drug barriers:

FDA approved 1996, Vitrasert was first non-biodegradable, intravitreal

implant. Used for the delivery of the anti-viral

drug, ganciclovir to treat AIDs-related Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis.

Ganciclovir is a synthetic analogue of the nucleoside 2-deoxyguanosine, which causes chain termination,

preventing replication. Implant holds 4.5-5 mg of the prodrug

which is released at a rate of approx. 1-1.5 µg/hr over 5-8 months.

The 4 mm device consists of a compressed drug pellet core which is completely covered, except at its top

surface, with the impermeable polymer; EVA. This entire assembly is

then coated by the permeable polymer; (PVA).

Surgical Implantation The implant is inserted by making a 5-6mm scleral incision into the pars plana.

It is then fixed into place using sutures. The wound is closed and a saline solution is injected to restore normal ocular pressure.

Most patients experience blurred vision which usually clears between 2-4 weeks

Retisert• For treatment of chronic, non-infectious uveitis (inflammation) including

sympathetic ophthalmia. • 3mm x 2mm x 5mm in size• Reservoir of fluocinolone acetonide (corticosteroid thought to act by

inducing phospholipase A2 inhib. proteins). 600ng a day decreasing to 300-400ng over the first month.

• Inserted through the pars plana into the vitreous humour• Active for 2 and a half years• Removal can cause problems• SEs = Cataracts (observed in 90% of patients after 3 years), increased I.O

pressure, eye pain, headache, nasopharyngitis and joint pain.

Top View

Side View

Silicone cup containing

drug Release orifice

PVA structure

tab

5mm

2mm

3mm

• 0.59mg tablet is held in a silicone elastomer

cup.

• The release orifice is separated from the

drugby a PVA membrane.

• The structure is held together with silicone

glue

Ozurdex

Ozurdex is a biodegradable intravitreal implant that delivers a sustained release of demaxaethasone (700ml) to the retina and vitreous humour. Ozurdex can improve visual acuity and macular thickness. It is used to treat macular edema, Retinal vein occlusion and non-infectious uveitis (posterior).

Iluvien

• Recently approved as a treatment for DME (Diabetic Macular Edema)

• It weighs 0.18mg and dispenses 0.2µg of the drug daily• It is the only drug therapy for DME treatment• In phase II trials for the treatment of wet and dry AMD and

RVO• Active ingredient is fluocinolone acetonide

DELIVERY• injected intra-vitreally using a 25 gauge needle.• minimally invasive procedure, no need for suture• Non-erodible insert• Designed to deliver drug for up to 3 years• Easier to deliver then retisert because of its smaller size

Diseases of the Eye• Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

:• Diabetic

Retinopathy:

• Glaucoma:

• CMV Retinitis:

• Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME):

• Uveitis:

Retinal Detachmenthttp://www.beltina.org/health-dictionary/retinal-detachment-symptoms-treatment-surgery-recovery.html

Vitreous Haemorrhagehttp://medweb.bham.ac.uk/easdec/vitreous_hemorrhage.html

Cystoid Macular Oedemahttp://www.mvretina.com/education/12.html

Endophthalimitishttp://www.primehealthchannel.com/endophthalmitis.html

Implant Type: Biodegradable Non-Biodegradable

Pros: Will be cleared from body naturally, no need for surgical removal.

Drug release can be controlled more precisely.

Cons: Controlof drug release from degradable systems is more difficult.

Must be surgically removed.

Non

-Bio

deg

rad

able

Im

pla

nts

Bio

deg

rad

able

Im

pla

nt

Vitrasert

Structure

Dynamic: Static:

•Tear Dilution- max. only 30µl tear volume comfortably accommodated. In eye when the average eye drop is 50 µl in volume – inevitable spillage!•Naso-lacrimal duct- when tears exceed normal tear volume of 7-10 µl•Systemic Removal – the conjunctiva is highly vascularised and any drug permeating it is rapidly removed by the systemic circulation and eventually transported to the GIT.

•Cornea-Hydrophobic and hydrophilic layers connected by tight junctions and containing efflux pumps inducing multidrug resistance. (p-glycoprotein and MRP)•Sclera-Opaque matrix of proteoglycans and collagen that acts as a filter with preferred permeability for small, hydrophilic and positively charged molecules due to it’s structure.•Blood-Ocular Barriers –the blood-retinal barrier arises from the retinal pigment epithelium prevents transfer of molecules between itself and choroidal blood with tight junctions and according to some studies show P-gp efflux pumps present also.

Introduction

Implants: The Way Forward?

Side Effects and Complications of

Implants

Pros Cons

Self-administration Patient compliance poor

Easy accessibility Limited Bioavailability due to barriers

Limited adverse systemic effects Does not reach the posterior of the eye

Pros Cons

Does not need to be administered daily. Administration is an invasive procedure

Some can deliver drug for up to 3 years Surgically implanted.

Some don’t need surgical extraction Some need surgical procedure to extract

Localised dispersion of the drug Most are specific to the drugs they carry.

Pros Cons

Non-invasive method of drug delivery Poor bioavailability to eye.

Treats the posterior segment of the eye Difficulty crossing the blood-retinal barrier.

Easy for drugs to penetrate the choroid. Higher risk of adverse effect

Topical administration

Implant Administration

Systemic administration

Implants Vs. Other Deliveries

Pros Cons

Longer duration than drops Must be given several times a month

More drug availability to eye than systemic drugs

Must be administered by a physician

Limited adverse systemic effects Not as long lasting as implants

Intraocular Injections

Conclusion

Ref: http://computerkiddoswiki.pbworks.com/w/page/16304712/Five%20Senses

Ref: http://www.engagesite.com/healthwork.

html

References: http://www.oculist.net/downaton502/prof/ebook/duanes/pages/v3/v3c028a.html, http://www.carolinaretinacenter.com/PE_article5.html, http://www.bausch.co.nz/en_US/ecp/pharma/product/vitrasert.aspx, "Ocular Drug Delivery" Authors : Ripal Gaudana, Hari Krishna Ananthula, Ashwin Parenky, and Ashim K. Mitra (http://www.helsinki.fi/farmasia/biofarmasia/opiskelu/provopinnot/bjktentti/ocular+PK.pdf) "THE CHALLENGES OF OPHTHALMIC DRUG DELIVERY: A REVIEW” AUTHORS: SINGH, AHMAD, HEMING (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895432/), Critical appraisal of the clinical utility of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) for the treatment of macular edema related to branch retinal vein occlusion or central retinal vein occlusion Annie Chan, Loh-Shan Leung, and Mark S Blumenkranz (Published online 2011 July 26), Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis Rebecca S Hunter and Ann-Marie Lobo (published online 2011 November 11), http://www.bauschvrx.com/, http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Application_withdrawal_assessment_report/2010/01/WC500068245.pdf , Shalin, S et al. (2010). Drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye for pharmacologic therapy. Expert Rev Ophthalmol.. 1 (5(1)), 75–93, Kompella, Uday B et al. (2010). Recent advances in ophthalmic drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 1 (3), 435-456, Short, Brian G. (2008). Safety Evaluation of Ocular Drug Delivery Formulations: Techniques and Practical Considerations. Toxicologic Pathology. 36 (49), 49-64.

 .http://www.psivida.com/products-iluvien.html

1.Iluvien ™ : a new sustained delivery technology for posterior eye disease Frances E Kane † , Judith Burdan , Antonio Cutino & Kenneth E.Green

†Alimera Sciences, Inc.

Above : Implant on day 3 (A) and day 180 (B)

Ozurdex is made using a solid biodegradable polymer. This polymer is composed of an apolylactic acid-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) matrix. This dissolves completely in vivo. The products of this are lactic acid and glycolic acid, which are converted into Carbon dioxide and Water

http://tpx.sagepub.com/content/36/1/49.full

http://depts.washington.edu/hivaids/oit/case7/fig7d.html

Pros: Slows down the median time to disease progression in comparison to I.V. Con: Increased risk of developing contralateral eye retinitis and systemic CMV.

IOVS- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (An ARVO Journal)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macular_degeneration

http://diabetestesting-578.com/warning-diabetic-peripheral-neuropathy

http://od.pcli.com/articles/a-new-doctor/diabetes-and-cataract-surgery

http://www.otm1.com/page/services_otm

http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=121809

http://www.eyesite.ca/7modules/Module7/html/Mod7Case7Ref.html

Due to the physiology of the eye, ocular drug delivery poses a challenge. For this reason, routes which are favoured by patients for ease of administration are

not the most effective forms of treatment. The bioavailability of drugs administered topically and systemically reaches a level which is far inferior to implant bioavailability. Intraocular injections also fall short of implants as they must be given every few weeks by a physician which is time consuming and unpleasant for patients. Until these issues are addressed or new less invasive techniques are developed, ocular implants appear to be the most favourable choice for chronic diseases of the eye. They are long lasting and eliminate patient compliance issues while bypassing many of the barriers which limit

bioavailability of other administration routes.