ei assessment
TRANSCRIPT
Emotional intelligence; is that all there is? New proposals for the EI assessment
Edgar Bresó Esteve Ph.D.
Associate Professor Emotionally Intelligent Organization Research Group
LOGO Model/Hypothesis
LOGO Emotional Intelligence (Mayer & Salovey, 1997)
E I 2
3 4
1 PERCEIVING ABILITIES USING
UNDERSTANDING MANAGING
LOGO EI Assessment
Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i) Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) Genos Emotional Intelligence Inventory Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-24)
Emotion Recognition Emotional Skills and Competence Questionnaire (ESCQ)
LOGO EI Assessment
LOGO Which one seems to be better…
LOGO Output…
LOGO Assesment #1 (n=152) Correlations
Note: All α ≥ .70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Emotional Intelligence
-
2. VIGOR -.06 -
3. DEDICATION .10 .58** -
4. EXHAUSTION -.28** .31** -.20** -
5. DEPERSON. -.10 -.56** -.38** .21** -
6. PER. ACOMP. -.14 .63** .51** -.23** -.51** -
7. PERFORMANCE .18 .38** .19** -.31** -.19** .31** -
LOGO Assesment #2 (n=116) Correlations
Note: All α ≥ .70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Emotional Intelligence
-
2. VIGOR .13 -
3. DEDICATION .09 .58** -
4. EXHAUSTION -.12** .31** -.20** -
5. DEPERSON. -.10 -.56** -.38** .21** -
6. PER. ACOMP. .12 .63** .51** -.23** -.51** -
7. PERFORMANCE .10 .38** .19** -.31** -.19** .31** -
LOGO 4th. Branch (n=116)
Correlations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. EI (4th.) -
2. VIGOR .21* -
3. DEDICATION .15** .58** -
4. EXHAUSTION -.27** .31** -.20** -
5. DEPERSON. -.19** -.56** -.38** .21** -
6. PERSONAL AC. .14 .63** .51** -.23** -.51** -
7. PERFORMANCE .16* .38** .19** -.31** -.19** .31**
-
LOGO 1st. vs 4th. Branch (n=116)
Correlations
1 2 3
1. EI (1st.) -
2. EI (4th.) .39* -
*Empathy Quotient (Baron & Wheelwright, 2003)
3. Empathy* 21+ 57** -
LOGO EI Assessment (Other surveys)
v POFA (Pictures of Facial Affect) Ekman & Fresen, 1976. v JACBART (Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition
Test) Matsumoto et. al, 2000.
v METT (Micro-expressions Training Tool) Ekman, 2004. Roberts, 2006: Do not correlate* with the 1st scale of MSCEIT
… The MSCEIT method of rating the extend of emotions in a still photo of a face seems to capture a different skill from multiple-choice assessment of facial expression presented for only a fraction of second (as in the JACBART)…
*Correlation ≅ .07
LOGO
LOGO Interviews… (n=97)
v This is the “best” assessment method I have ever used.
v Is not very boring, not long, useful, etc.
BUT… (Respondents told me…) 1.- Pictures were not enough to make me feel… 2.- I was not very “involved” in the task (less than into the other three) 3.- Probably in the next time I would answer differently 4.- Honestly, I do not believe on its reliability
LOGO Time Flows… Very quick!
LOGO Speculations…
v Faces are NOT SPANISH… so the Spanish population do not understand their emotions
1.- This survey has been already tested by
Extremera & Berrocal, 2009. 2.- Facial expression of emotions is
universal (Ekman, 1970). 3.- The real problem was not about faces…
LOGO Speculations…
v In the 21st. Century, pictures are not enough. People don’t feel anything by pictures. We are used to other technologies… it seems artificial…
- But, in other contexts pictures work… Or
not? - Have you had similar problems?
LOGO Speculations…
v An Emotionally Intelligent person is not (only) a person who is able to give the “right” answer…
- He/She must be able to find the answer at
the first attempt, and quickly.
LOGO Conclusions…
v On the other hand, if the ‘perception’ is actually an important branch, and it needs to be assessed, maybe I could design a new assessment method for this branch.
LOGO Conclusions… v If I want to develop and implement an
intervention based on the four branches model, I need to be sure that each branch is assessed properly.
v An alternative could be forgetting the four branches and focus just on the management of emotions (the fourth branch).
v Thus, we should speak about the Management of Emotions instead of the Emotional Intelligence and the intervention should be developed for increasing just this competence.
LOGO Proposals…
v The importance of TIME Control.
v Possibility for correcting/changing answers
v Less “artificial”, more
“dynamic”.
jjjjjj
jjjjj
jjjjj
jjjjjj
jjjjj
jjjjj
jjjjjj
jjjjj
jjjjj
jjjjjj
jjjjj
jjj
Edgar Breso [email protected]