elaine murakami [email protected] fhwa office of planning may 2007
DESCRIPTION
LEHD Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics http://lehd.dsd.census.gov/led/ U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Dept of Labor/ETA program. Elaine Murakami [email protected] FHWA Office of Planning May 2007. Outline. Importance of employment data and home-to-work flow Early findings - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
LEHDLongitudinal Employer Household
Dynamics http://lehd.dsd.census.gov/led/
U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Dept of Labor/ETA program
Elaine [email protected]
FHWA Office of PlanningMay 2007
Outline
• Importance of employment data and home-to-work flow
• Early findings
• Describe LEHD Process
• Caveat Emptor! Review and Evaluation of the Data BEFORE using it for transportation purposes.
Data Sources for Transportation Planning
Source Number of MPOs % of MPOs responding
Decennial Census 138 91%
CTPP 112 74%
CPS 46 30%
Travel Surveys 21 14%
ACS 18 12%
State employment data 17 11%
MPO employment data 13 9%
Commercial Employment Data
4 3%23%
Different universes between Decennial Census/ACS and LEHD
Private for-profit 68%
Private not-for-profit 7% Government
15%
Self-employed10%
Different timeframes between Decennial Census/ACS and LEHD
Decennial Census + ACS
LEHD
Point in time, from sample survey
Survey form allows only one answer.
Accumulation of quarterly records in a calendar year
Individuals can have many different employers.
Currently using Census 2000 for small area home-to-work flows
New addition of 2004 data. Test of 2002/2003 data.
Common sources of error that affect all home-to-work results
• Incomplete address information results in inability to geocode work location
• Incomplete geographic reference files (especially new commercial areas) also results in inability to geocode work locations.
• Interpretation of WHERE is work? – Respondents in surveys, e.g. construction– Payroll offices, headquarters, school district hdqtrs
LEHD Chart
First release of “On the Map” (2002/2003 data)
• School districts often linked to district headquarters office, rather than a specific school. The district headquarters’ address is incorrect. (Colorado)
• State employees most often linked to an office in the State Capitol. (Illinois)
• Too many “out of state” commutes– 40% of workers from “out of state” in the “On the Map” data,
compared to 2% from “out of state” using the CTPP2000. (Illinois)
• Average distance of home-to-work exceeding 25 miles where CTPP2000 found about 12 miles – CTPP more consistent with regional survey and model results.
(California)
Workers who work in Skokie, IL
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
Lessthan 3.0
3.0-5.9 6.0 - 8.9 9.0 -11.9
12.0 -14.9
15.0 -19.9
20.0 -24.9
25.0 +
Distance to Skokie (Miles)
CTPPLEHD
Workers who live in Skokie
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
Lessthan 3.0
3.0 to5.9
6.0 to8.9
9.0 to11.9
12.0 to14.9
15.0 to19.9
20.0 to24.9
Over25.0
Distance from Skokie (Miles)
CTPP
LEHD
Downtown Chicago
Journey to Work Distance
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 10 20 30 40
One way "crow flies" commute distance (miles)
Cu
mu
lati
ve
Fre
qu
en
cy
Dis
trib
uti
on
HBP SSF SRPBish Emery stancup walnut
shore is like SRP
SJC is like SSF
SF Bay : Hacienda Business Park Compare LEHD to CTPP
CTPP LEHD
Within 5 miles 25% 10%
Within 10 miles 40% 21%
Within 20 miles 65% 38%
Source: Steve Raney, Cities 21
Are these isolated cases?
• We do not believe that these problems are isolated incidents, but instead may reflect systematic problems that have not yet been identified and resolved.
• Recommend thorough review of the data and processes before use by Transportation Planners.
StARS
QCEW (Covered Employment)
MN Model
Where are the Workplace Locations from?
• Step 1. Establish a list of potential workplace locations. – QCEW provides the workplace addresses. Some
addresses are payroll processing offices.
• Step 2. Assign workers to a specific worksite using a model based on MN data.
• Step 3. Add noise to protect confidentiality of firms
Issues with QCEW• Variability among states in level of effort used to get
Multiple Worksite Reports for large employers. – Variability in reporting from large employers for multiple worksite
reports.• Professional Employment Offices (PEOs) provide staffing
services to businesses to handle payroll, timecards, benefits. – This is a known problem in Florida, but may be increasing in other
states. A few states now require PEOs to report individual addresses.
• State and Local Government workers are OFTEN assigned to one location only (similar to business establishments)– The USDOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) sponsored
research in IL and FL found that in IL, state government workers were nearly always assigned to Springfield IL.
• School employees are often assigned to a School District office, rather than to individual schools.
Model based on Minnesota data. • The MWR does not link individual
employees by SSN to a specific worksite. – Only in Minnesota (MN) does the
Unemployment Insurance (UI) file with SSN provide a link to a specific worksite.
– Therefore, to assign individual workers to a specific worksite in all other states, a model was built using data from MN.
• Step 3 (Disclosure proofing) only adds noise to the data.
Residence Data: Statistical Administrative Research Systems:
Issues• College/university students are most likely to
report a parent’s address for their W-2, • Temporary employment may also create
problems where a permanent address is used rather than an actual residence.
• Potential problems with incorrect SSN linkages due to undocumented workers using “borrowed” SSNs.
• Moving residences within a year. – Most residence information is taken from IRS 1040’s
(April 1), but primary job is selected by highest earnings.
Caveat Emptor !
• The On the Map project has promise in the long run, but for now,
• Transportation Planners should not use the LEHD On the Map data without thorough review and evaluation as the first step.
• Problems should be conveyed to the LEHD project team, so that research on the causes can be conducted.