President Donald Trump Legal Team Press Conference Regarding Evidence of Election Fraud

Statements by Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Jenna

Ellis

November 19, 2020

1

RUDY GIULIANI: Good afternoon and thank you very much 1

for coming. This is representative of our legal team. 2

We're representing Trump and we're representing the 3

Trump campaign. When I finish, Sidney Powell and then 4

Jenna Ellis will follow me and we will present, in 5

brief, the evidence that we've collected over the 6

last -- I guess it is two weeks. Also, Joseph DiGenova 7

and Victoria Toensing are here with me. There are a lot 8

more lawyers working on this, but I guess we're the 9

senior lawyers, and Boris Epshteyn. 10

So, I guess the best way to describe this is when 11

we began our representation of the President, we 12

certainly were confirmed with a very anomalous set of 13

results with the President way ahead on election night, 14

700,000 or 800,000 in Pennsylvania. Somehow, we lost 15

Pennsylvania. We have statisticians willing to testify 16

that that's almost statistically impossible to have 17

happened in the period of time that it happened. But, 18

of course, that's just speculation. As we started 19

investigating, both our investigations and the very 20

patriotic and brave American citizens that have come 21

forward are extraordinary. An extraordinary number of 22

people -- extraordinary number of witnesses. And what 23

emerged very quickly is -- is it's not a singular voter 24

fraud in one state. This pattern repeats itself in a 25

2

number of states -- almost exactly the same pattern 1

which, to any experienced investigator or prosecutor 2

would suggest that there was a plan from a centralized 3

place to execute these various acts of the voter fraud, 4

specifically focused on big cities and specifically 5

focused on -- as you would imagine -- big cities 6

controlled by Democrats, and specifically focused on 7

big cities that have a long history of corruption. 8

The number of voter fraud causes in Philadelphia 9

could fill a library. Just a few weeks ago there was a 10

conviction for voter fraud and one two weeks before 11

that. And I've often said, I guess sarcastically, but 12

it's true -- the only surprise I would have found in 13

this was if Philadelphia hadn't cheated in this 14

election, because for the last 60 years, they've 15

cheated in just about every single election. 16

You could say the same thing about Detroit. Each 17

one of these cities are cities that are controlled by 18

Democrats. Which means that they can get away with 19

anything they want to do. It means they have a certain 20

degree of control over -- certainly control the 21

Election Board completely and they control law 22

enforcement. And unfortunately, they have some 23

friendly judges that will issue ridiculously irrational 24

opinions just to come out in their favor. 25

3

So, let's start with the specifics. Pennsylvania: 1

In Pennsylvania, the margin of victory now for Biden, 2

which is a -- not a victory -- it's fraud -- is 69,140 3

votes. The reality is that we are now at a count of 4

618,770 ballots, for which have we have affidavits that 5

there was no inspection of that ballot at the time that 6

it was entered in the vote. 7

If it was a mail ballot -- mail ballots are 8

particularly prone to fraud -- we were warned about 9

that by Jimmy Carter -- President Jimmy Carter and 10

Secretary Baker, in a report about a dozen years ago, 11

in which they said that mail balloting is particularly 12

susceptible of fraud, that we should very carefully 13

consider ever doing it, and that it can be taken 14

advantage of. Justice Souter warned us of the same 15

thing, in a comment in an election law case. And even 16

the New York Times wrote articles about how dangerous 17

mail-in voting was. And this is the first time we ever 18

did it en masse and I think we proved that all three 19

are prophets. 20

It's not only susceptible to fraud, it is easily 21

susceptible to fraud, particularly if you have a plan 22

or scheme which sounds eerily similar to what Joe Biden 23

told us before the election -- that he had the best 24

voter fraud team in the world. Well, they were good. 25

4

I don't know that they were that good because they made 1

significant mistakes, like all crooks do, and we caught 2

them. One of them was pushing out Republican 3

inspectors. 4

Every state -- almost every civilized 5

country -- even Tanzania and places where you wouldn't 6

think of, have rules about inspectors, particularly for 7

the mail-in ballots. And why particularly for mail-in 8

ballots? Because they can more easily be defrauded, 9

and you can't check on it. 10

People who have never done a mail-in ballot, I'm 11

going to show you why it’s so easy. Well, you fill out 12

an envelope like this. You put your -- usually in New 13

York it would be your assembly district and the 14

precinct in which you're voting. You fill out your 15

name and address and you sign it. You then use an 16

inner envelope and you put the ballot inside the inner 17

envelope. You seal it off and you send it in. When 18

it's being counted, almost invariably in the in United 19

States, up until the mass cheating that went on in this 20

election, a Republican and a Democrat inspector, as 21

well as others if there are other parties, is allowed 22

to watch the unsealing of this ballot. Used to go on 23

all over America when we conducted honest elections 24

because the only time you can ever find out if it's a 25

5

fraudulent ballot is when it is looked at. The minute 1

you approve this, you just throw it away -- gone for 2

eternity -- the only thing left is the vote. That 3

could have been Micky Mouse. That could have been a 4

dead person. That could have been not filled out 5

properly. That could have been the same person 30 6

times. All these things have happened, by the way. That 7

could have been nothing filled out. We'd never know. 8

So, for example, the recount being done in Georgia 9

will tell us nothing because these fraudulent ballots 10

will just be counted again, because they wouldn't 11

supply the signatures to match the ballots. So, it 12

means nothing to have counted these ballots because, 13

for example, in Pennsylvania, where we have probably 14

our most precise evidence, 682,770 of these ballots 15

were cast, put in and they weren't inspected, which 16

renders them marked. They weren’t inspected, which 17

renders them ballots that are null and void -- cannot 18

be counted, have to be removed from the vote. Why? For 19

several reasons, not the least of which is, that was 20

basically only one of two places in the state where it 21

was done. So, in the other parts of the state there 22

was a legitimate inspection of the ballots. So, if you 23

have two different standards in different parts of the 24

state -- one favoring one part of the state, the other 25

6

disfavoring the other part of the state, that's classic 1

violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United 2

States Constitution, Bush v. Gore being the most recent 3

case that teaches that. 4

That's not the only fraud that went on in 5

Pennsylvania. All of the other frauds carried out in 6

the other states by the Democrat bosses happened there 7

as well. For example, if you made a mistake in that 8

ballot and you lived in Philadelphia or in Pittsburgh, 9

you were allowed to fix the mistake. But if you lived 10

in the -- what would be considered more 11

Republican -- more Trump part of the state -- you were 12

given no such right. 13

One of our plaintiffs, Mr. Henry, cast an absentee 14

ballot and he failed to put it in the secure envelope 15

inside -- just put it in open, naked. That ballot was 16

cast aside because it was invalid, because that breaks 17

the privacy of the vote. In Pittsburgh and in 18

Philadelphia, if they noticed that there wasn't an 19

inner envelope, they'd contact the voter and allow them 20

to vote again or if he didn't fill it out completely, 21

or if he made a mistake and didn't sign his full name, 22

he was allowed to cure it. There is no such provision 23

under the law in Pennsylvania the Democrat Secretary of 24

State made that up in order to maximize the votes in 25

7

Philadelphia and Pittsburgh and to minimize the votes 1

in the other parts of the state. Clearly illegal, 2

clearly voter fraud, easily provable, hundreds of 3

witnesses, maybe thousands. 4

We have -- to give you another example -- we have 5

17,000 provisional ballots cast in Pittsburgh. Do you 6

know what a provisional ballot is? A provisional 7

ballot usually happens this way -- about 15,000 of the 8

17,000 happened this way. You walk in and say, "I'm 9

here to vote today." 10

11

"Oh, Mr. Giuliani, you already voted." 12

13

"I did? I don't remember voting." 14

15

"Oh yes, yes. You cast an absentee ballot." 16

17

"No, I didn't?" 18

19

"Yes, you did." 20

21

Why does that happen 17,000 times in Pittsburgh? 22

People walked in thinking -- actually 15,000 to be 23

precise -- why did it happen 15,000 times that people 24

in Pittsburgh walked in to vote and they had already 25

8

voted according to the Democrat election machine? Did 1

they forget -- that many people with bad memories in 2

Pittsburgh? Or is the following correct, that as 3

witnesses will testify, they were instructed by the 4

Democrat bosses, when they had a ballot in which there 5

was no one registered, just assign it to somebody. 6

Just assign it to Rudy Giuliani, so when Rudy 7

Giuliani -- maybe Rudy Giuliani won't show up to vote. 8

And if he does show up to vote, we'll give him a 9

provisional ballot. 10

That is what we call circumstantial evidence of 11

the fraud. The direct evidence of the fraud are people 12

who testified that, in fact, that's what happened to 13

them, as well as 50 to 60 witnesses we have for the way 14

they were treated and not allowed to inspect the 15

ballots. They aren't just not allowed to do it, they 16

were pushed. In a few cases they were assaulted. In 17

all cases they were put in a corral, so far away, 18

probably the closest they got is from here to the back 19

of that room. We could do like a -- did you all watch 20

My Cousin Vinny? It's one of my favorite law movies, 21

because he comes from Brooklyn. And when the nice lady 22

said she saw, and then he says to her, "How many 23

fingers have I got up?" And she says, "Three." Well, 24

she was too far away to see it was only two. These 25

9

people were further away than My Cousin Vinny was from 1

the witness. They couldn't see a thing. 2

Now, I don't know, are you going to tell me that 3

sixty people are lying? They didn't just tell me this. 4

They swore under penalty of perjury, which is something 5

no Democrat's ever done. You don't even ask Biden 6

about this. You don't put him under penalty of 7

perjury. He doesn't even get asked questions about it 8

He doesn't get asked questions about all the evidence 9

of the crimes that he committed. These people are 10

under penalty of perjury. Their names are on an 11

affidavit. They swear that they weren't allowed to 12

carry out their function as expected. 13

And it's not just a technical thing -- there's a 14

reason they did it. Why would you not allow people to 15

carry out the function they've been allowed to do for 16

50 years, 60 years? Why wouldn't you allow inspections 17

of those ballots? Because you knew you were going to 18

use those ballots to catch Biden up, and you had a big 19

road ahead of you. You had to catch him up for 700,000 20

to 800,000 votes that he was behind, and the only way 21

you were going to do it is with the mail-in ballots. 22

You couldn't have a Democrat and Republican inspector 23

around. They don't even have Democrats watching them, 24

10

because they'd be afraid that they'd be honest 1

Democrats who would say "You're cheating." 2

So that takes us to Michigan, where there was an 3

honest Democrat who said they were cheating. Let me 4

show you her affidavit, because I know you keep 5

reporting falsely that we have no evidence, that we 6

have no specific acts of fraud. That's because the 7

coverage of this has been almost as dishonest as the 8

scheme itself. The people are entitled to know this. 9

You don't have the right to keep it from them. You 10

don't have a right to lie to about it. They are. You 11

don't report to them that a citizen of this country, 12

very fine woman, who is willing to allow me to give you 13

her name -- I can't give you all these affidavits 14

because if I do these people will be harassed, they'll 15

be threatened, they may lose their job, they will lose 16

their friends. We've lost lawyers in this case because 17

they've been threatened. We've had lawyers that need 18

protection. What's going in this country is horrible, 19

and the censorship that you're imposing is making it 20

worse. 21

But Jessie Jacob is an adult citizen of the state 22

of Michigan. She's been an employee of the city of 23

Detroit for Decades. I know her age, but she can tell 24

you her age. She was assigned to voting duties in 25

11

September, and she was trained by the city of Detroit 1

in the State of Michigan. She was basically trained to 2

cheat. She says, I was instructed by my supervisor to 3

adjust the mailing date of these absentee ballot 4

packages to be dated earlier than when they were 5

actually sent in. The supervisor made that 6

announcement for all workers to engage in that 7

fraudulent practice. 8

That's not me saying that, that's this American 9

citizen saying that, under oath. I don't know, maybe 10

you could say she's lying, but you can't say there's no 11

evidence. This is what we call evidence. This is 12

direct evidence, not circumstantial. I've tried many, 13

many cases as have my colleagues here. You put a 14

witness on a witness stand, the witness is testifying 15

to their own knowledge. This witness goes on the 16

witness stand and she will say, "I was told to adjust 17

the date on the absentee ballots. I witnessed election 18

workers and employees going over to the voting booths 19

with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them 20

for whom to vote." Completely. She will testify to 21

that. I don't know. Biden's people can cross-examine 22

her, but you can't just throw it away. "Gee, there's 23

no evidence." Next time you say that you'll be lying 24

because there is evidence. 25

12

By the way, this is public. You can all get it. 1

Its attached to the complaint in Constantino v. The 2

City of Detroit. Then, she was instructed by a 3

supervisor not to ask for a driver's license or any 4

photo ID when a person was trying to vote. Don't ask 5

for an identification. Why would you not ask for 6

identification? Because you knew that a lot of people 7

not entitled to vote are going to come in and early 8

vote -- because you knew that illegal immigrants were 9

going to be allowed to vote. You knew if you lived in 10

Philadelphia, unless you're stunad, that's an Italian 11

expression for stupid, unless you were stupid, you knew 12

that a lot of people were coming over from Camden to 13

vote. They do every year -- happens all the time in 14

Philly. It's about as frequent as getting beaten up at 15

a Philadelphia Eagle football game. Happens all the 16

time -- all the time. And it is allowed to happen 17

because it is a Democrat, corrupt city and has been for 18

years, many, many years. 19

And they are carried it out in places they could 20

get away with it. They didn't carry it out in neutral 21

places. They didn't carry it out in Republican places. 22

They didn't carry it out where the law is respected. 23

They carried it out in a corrupt city where the 24

13

District Attorney releases criminals en masse, which is 1

why it has so much crime. 2

She also said, "I observed a large number of 3

people who came to the satellite location to vote in 4

person, but they had already applied for and submitted 5

an absentee ballot." So, she observed a lot people 6

voting twice. Again, this is Jessie Jacob, not me. I 7

was instructed not to invalidate any ballots and not to 8

look for any deficiency in the ballots. Why would you 9

do that? Because you're cheating -- on 10

purpose -- cheating. Intentionally cheating. You're 11

cheating as an institution. This is an instruction 12

from the Election Commission, or the employer to the 13

worker. Don't look for any deficiencies in the 14

ballots. "I was instructed not to look at any of the 15

of the signatures on the absentee ballots." If she was 16

instructed not to look for any of the signatures on the 17

absentee ballots, why the heck do you sign it in the 18

first place? In order to identify it. She was 19

instructed not to do that because many of the absentee 20

ballots were fraudulent and they knew that. And they 21

didn't want to have a count of that. 22

"On November 4, 2020, I was instructed to 23

improperly pre-date the absentee ballots when the 24

receipt date was actually was after November 3rd, 25

14

2020." Now this is really significant because Justice 1

Alito of the Supreme Court instructed Pennsylvania that 2

any ballot that comes in after 8:00 o'clock on 3

November 3rd 2020, had to be put aside and not only 4

because it's a question as to its legality and its 5

constitutionality. What she's telling you is that they 6

blatantly disregarded that order, that they took 7

ballots that were marked the 4th and the 5th and the 8

6th, and they marked it down for the 3rd in blatant 9

disregard of the order of the United States Supreme 10

Court. 11

This is -- I don't know if she's a Democrat or a 12

Republicans, I assume if she's working for the City of 13

Detroit that she's a Democrat. I assume, but I may be 14

wrong. She's a citizen. I have never met her -- never 15

coached her. And I'd like you to know that it's signed 16

under penalty of perjury. We have a hundred more of 17

these. I can't show them to you because those people 18

don't want to be harassed. They don't want to have 19

their lives torn apart by the goons on the other side. 20

We don't do that to them. They've done that to a lot 21

of our people. They've done it for four years. And 22

it's outrageous that it's tolerated. And it's 23

tolerated because you condone it in the press. You 24

don't cover it. You don't condemn it. And it 25

15

shouldn't happen to a Republican, or a Democrat. A 1

lawyer shouldn't have to withdraw from a case because 2

he's representing the President of the United States. 3

There are many more affidavits here. I'd like to 4

read them all to you, but I don't have the time. You 5

should have had the time and energy to go look for 6

them. That's your job like it's my job to defend the 7

President. And I represent the President. It’s your 8

job to the read these things and not falsely report 9

that there's no evidence. Do you know how many 10

affidavits we have in the Michigan case -- 220 11

affidavits. They're not all public, but eight of them 12

are. Four affiants here -- those are people who give 13

affidavits -- who report an incident that under any 14

other circumstances would have been on the front page 15

of all of your newspapers if it didn't involve the 16

hatred that you have -- the irrational, pathological 17

hatred that you have for the President. 18

What they swear to is that at 4:30 in the morning 19

a truck pulled up to the Detroit center where they were 20

counting ballots. People thought it was food, so they 21

all ran to the truck. It wasn't food. It was 22

thousands and thousands of ballots. And the ballots 23

were in garbage cans. They were in paper bags. They 24

were in cardboard boxes, and they were taken into the 25

16

center. They put out a number of tables. At that 1

time, they thought all the Republican inspectors had 2

left. All but two had. And an employee of Dominion, 3

who we will address a little bit later -- Dominion. 4

And here's what they jointly swear to: That every 5

ballot that they could see everything they could 6

hear -- these were ballots for Biden. When they saw a 7

ballot, these were ballots only for Biden, meaning 8

there was no down ticket, just Biden. Many of them 9

didn't have anything on the outer envelope because 10

these ballots were produced very quickly, very swiftly, 11

and they're estimated to be minimum of 60,000 maximum 12

of 100,000. Many of them were triple-counted which 13

means they were put into the counting machine this way 14

– once, twice, three, times. 15

I didn't see that. I don't know that but for the 16

fact that three American citizens are willing to swear 17

to it. And we're not going to let them go to court and 18

do that? We're going to let this election go by, and 19

when there are, in this case, 60 witnesses that can 20

prove what I'm saying to you and other acts of fraud in 21

Michigan? And what's happened to this country if we're 22

going to let that happen? What's happened to this 23

country if we're going to cover that up? We let Al 24

17

Gore carry on an election dispute longer than this one 1

has been going on for one state and for chads. 2

This happened in Pennsylvania, it happened in 3

Michigan. Michigan, probably right now if I count up 4

the affidavits, just one case alone, Trump v. Benson, a 5

case that we dismissed today because that case was 6

attempting to get the Wayne County Board of Supervisors 7

to certify. Well, they didn't; they decertified. That 8

case has 100 affidavits and the hundred affidavits show 9

essentially what I've talked to you about -- counting 10

ballots improperly, counting them three or four times, 11

having people vote three or four times, changing and 12

backdating ballots to the point of at least 300,000 13

illegitimate ballots that we can specifically identify. 14

The margin in Michigan was is 146,121, and these 15

ballots were all cast basically in Detroit that Biden 16

won 80/20. So, you see it changes the result of the 17

election in Michigan if you take out Wayne County, so 18

it's a very significant case. That is being raised in 19

the case of Constantino v. The City of Detroit, not by 20

us, by an individual plaintiff. We are helping and 21

assisting in that case, however. And you can find all 22

the affidavits that you want filed in that case. You 23

can find out not just allegations; they're allegations 24

supported by sworn testimony, which is a lot better 25

18

than Joe Biden has ever done on anything. He doesn't 1

answer questions, must mush lest give sworn affidavits. 2

Wisconsin: Wisconsin had a very small 3

margin -- 20,544 last time I looked. And Wisconsin, 4

without going into great detail -- very similar plan 5

with the Republicans shut out in the city of Milwaukee 6

and also in Madison -- Republicans almost universally 7

shut out from the absentee process, not allowed to 8

inspect, not allowed to look at the ballots. 9

We have in Milwaukee and in the state of 10

Wisconsin a much stricter law. Wisconsin doesn't allow 11

mail-in ballots. They didn't buy into the big mail-in 12

ballot situation. Wisconsin, when you look at their 13

constitution, it almost seems to not like absentee 14

ballots. They state it's not a right, it’s a 15

privilege. And they have very, very strict procedures. 16

And the strict procedure says that you can't be given 17

an absentee ballot, you have to personally apply for 18

one. It's illegal, basically, to solicit a vote. And 19

they have actually, many reasons for it. It probably 20

goes back to their progressive days. When I say 21

progressive, I mean late nineteenth century, early 22

twentieth century progressive, when that really meant 23

progressive, not retrogressive. 24

19

So, there were 60,000 ballots in Milwaukee County, 1

and 40,000 ballots in Madison that, as far as we can 2

tell, and this is why we've ordered, because we have 3

very good information that numbers are going to come 4

out about here, that don't have applications. Under 5

the law of the State of Wisconsin, which has already 6

decided if there's no application for an absentee 7

ballot, the absentee ballot is thrown away. This all 8

happened in two places in Wisconsin. It didn't happen 9

in northern Wisconsin. It didn't happen in Republican 10

Wisconsin. It didn't happen in neutral Wisconsin where 11

there's an equal number of Republicans and Democrats. 12

It happened in a place where the vote was 75-80% for 13

the Democrat. You take away any number of those and 14

that 20,000 lead disappears. In other words, if you 15

count the lawful votes, Trump won Wisconsin by a good 16

margin. Indeed, if you count the lawful votes in 17

Pennsylvania, he won by about 300,000 votes. 18

Also, in the lawsuit filed Wisconsin which is 19

really a petition because of their procedures, there 20

were no inspectors provided for the counting of illegal 21

ballots. There were numerous backdated ballots. We're 22

just counting them now, run over into the thousands. 23

And there were many precincts in which there was an 24

overvote. And let me explain to you what an overvote 25

20

is, which is something you should have explained to the 1

American people because it's about the clearest 2

circumstantial evidence of massive fraud can you have. 3

An overvote is if 200% of the people who are registered 4

in the district vote. Think about that: 200% of the 5

registered voters in the district vote. What does that 6

mean? That means somebody voted twice. That means 7

somebody who's not entitled to vote, voted -- an 8

illegal, a person from another city or state, a person 9

who's not registered. But what it means is that those 10

were illegitimate votes. You don't have an overvote of 11

200 percent or 300 percent. You don't have an overvote 12

of 100%. Most precincts don't have a 100% turnout. In 13

fact, classically it's considered to be an overvote if 14

you go over 80%. Well, in Michigan and Wisconsin we 15

have overvotes in numerous precincts of a 150% or 200% 16

and 300%. One of the reasons why the two Republicans 17

didn’t certify, in Wayne, Michigan -- Wayne County, 18

Michigan -- is because the overvote was so high, 19

monstrously high, in about two-thirds of the precincts 20

in the City of Detroit, which means, magically, 21

two-and-three times the number of registered voters 22

turned out to vote. In fact, we have precincts in 23

which two times of the number of people who live there, 24

including children, voted. It's absurd. 25

21

The frustration of this is, what I'm describing to 1

you is massive fraud. It isn't a little teeny one. 2

It's isn't, you know, a hundred votes switched here or 3

there. Georgia -- we're about to file a major lawsuit 4

in Georgia. That will be filed, probably tomorrow. I 5

don't need to go through it -- virtually the same 6

things I told you before. In the City of Atlanta, the 7

Republicans were not allowed to watch the absentee 8

mail-in ballot process. Inspections were completely 9

cast aside. And we have numerous double-voters. We 10

have numerous out-of-state voters. And we have 11

specific evidence of intimidation and changes of vote. 12

That will all be in the lawsuit that comes out 13

tomorrow. 14

Arizona is a state that we're looking at very, 15

very carefully. I would say we're probably going to 16

bring a lawsuit in Arizona -- more than probably. I 17

think we are going to bring a lawsuit in Arizona; we're 18

still collecting that evidence. And the state that 19

we're looking at that would surprise you is, we have 20

very, very significant amount of fraud allegations in 21

the state of New Mexico, which -- and we have a 22

significant number of allegations in the state of 23

Virginia. We don't know yet whether the number in 24

22

Virginia will reach a number that can turn the 1

election. 2

The states that we have indicated in -- Georgia 3

Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Arizona, 4

we have more than double the number of votes needed to 5

overturn the election, in terms of provable illegal 6

ballots. All you got to do to find out if I'm 7

misleading you at all is to look at the lawsuits. Look 8

at what's alleged. Look at the affidavits. Maybe we 9

can supply more affidavits. In order to do it I need 10

to get permission from the people, but in the materials 11

I have here there are at least ten that come from 12

citizens. We have a thousand, at least. And we're 13

getting more every day, and there are other aspects of 14

this fraud that at this point I really can't reveal. 15

This is really enough. It's enough to overturn any 16

election. It's disgrace what happened. 17

And I'll conclude by asking you to just think 18

about this for a minute: What happened on the morning 19

of November 3rd when they were going to count this new 20

kind of ballot -- this mail-in ballot? Did every 21

Democrat leader in Pennsylvania and in Michigan and in 22

Wisconsin and in Georgia and in Nevada and in 23

Arizona -- did they all wake up and all separately have 24

the same idea? Did they all separately have the idea 25

23

that we are going to put Republican inspectors in 1

pens -- we're not going to let them look at mail-in or 2

absentee ballots? Did they all independently come up 3

with that, just by coincidence? Hey, we're going to 4

put the Republicans in pens and corrals -- we're going 5

to do it in Pittsburgh; we're going to do it in 6

Philadelphia; we're going to do it in Detroit; we're 7

going to do it in Milwaukee; we're going to do it in 8

Las Vegas; we're going to do it in Phoenix; we're going 9

to do it in Atlanta -- or, is it the logical conclusion 10

that I think any jury would accept as they heard this 11

evidence that somebody had this plan? Maybe that was 12

always the plan -- to do this very, very questionable 13

form of voting which has been criticized by President 14

Carter, by Secretary Baker, by most experts on election 15

reform. I think the logical conclusion is this is a 16

common plan and a common scheme that comes right 17

directly from the Democrat Party and it comes from the 18

candidate. Clearly. That's the reason why Hillary 19

Clinton said, "Don't concede if even if you're losing." 20

That's the reason we had a Freudian slip by the 21

candidate when he said he had the best voter fraud team 22

in the country. That's the reason why he probably 23

didn't have to go out and campaign. He had to have 24

known what they were going to do. This had a to be 25

24

planned in advance. I'm kind of checking, did they go, 1

you know, to the same contractor to get the corrals to 2

put the republicans in. 3

This is a disgraceful thing that was done in this 4

country, probably not much more disgraceful than the 5

things these people did in office, which you didn't and 6

don't bother to cover and you conceal from the American 7

people. But we let this happen. You know, we use 8

largely the Venezuelan voting machine, in essence, to 9

count our vote. We let this happen, we're going to be 10

become Venezuela. We cannot let this happen to us. We 11

cannot allow these crooks, because that's what they 12

are, to steal an election from the American people. 13

They elected Donald Trump. They didn't elect Joe 14

Biden. Joe Biden is in the lead because of the 15

fraudulent ballots, the illegal ballots, that were 16

produced and that were allowed to be used after the 17

election was over. Give us an opportunity to prove it 18

in court and we will. 19

Now I'm going to ask. Sidney Powell to describe 20

to you what we can describe about another totally 21

outrageous situation. I don't think most Americans 22

know that our ballots get calculated -- many of 23

them -- outside of the United States and are completely 24

open to hacking -- completely open to change -- and 25

25

it's being done by a company that specializes in voter 1

fraud. I'll let Sidney describe that to you. 2

3

SIDNEY POWELL: Thank you, Rudy. What we are really 4

dealing with here and uncovering more by the day is the 5

massive influence of communist money through Venezuela, 6

Cuba, and likely China in the interference with our 7

elections here in the United States. The Dominion 8

voting systems, the Smartmatic technology software and 9

the software that goes in other computerized voting 10

systems here as well, not just Dominion, were created 11

in Venezuela, at the direction of Hugo Chavez, to make 12

sure he never lost an election after one constitutional 13

referendum came out the way he did not want to come 14

out. 15

We have one very strong witness who has explained 16

how it all works. His affidavit is attached to the 17

pleadings of Lin Wood in the lawsuit he filed in 18

Georgia. It is a stunning, detailed affidavit because 19

he was with Hugo Chavez while he was being briefed on 20

how it works. He was with Hugo Chavez when he saw it 21

operate to make sure the election came out his way, 22

that was the express purpose for creating this 23

software. He has seen it operate, and as soon as he 24

saw the multiple states shut down the voting at on the 25

26

night of the election, he knew the same thing was 1

happening here, that was what had gone on. 2

Now the software itself was created with so many 3

variables and so many back doors that can be hooked up 4

to the internet, or thumb drive stuck in it, or 5

whatever, but one of its most characteristic features 6

is its ability to flip votes. It can set and run an 7

algorithm that probably ran all over the country to 8

take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump 9

and flip them to President Biden, which we might never 10

have uncovered had the votes for President Trump have 11

been so overwhelming in so many of these states, that 12

it broke the algorithm that had been plugged into the 13

system, and that's what caused them to have to shut 14

down in the states they shut down in. That's when they 15

came in the back door with all the mail-in ballots, 16

many of which they'd actually fabricated. Some were on 17

pristine paper with identically matching, perfect 18

circle dots for Mr. Biden. Others were shoved in in 19

batches -- they're always put in in a certain number of 20

batches, and people would rerun the same batch. This 21

corresponds to our statistical evidence that shows 22

incredible spikes in the vote counts at particular 23

times and that corresponds to eyewitness testimony of 24

27

numerous people who have come forward and said they saw 1

the ballots come in the back door at that time. 2

Notably, the Dominion executives are nowhere to be 3

found, now. They're moving their offices overnight to 4

different places. Their office in Toronto was shared 5

with one of the Soros Entities. One of the leaders of 6

the Dominion project overall is Gordon Malloch-Brown, 7

Mr. Soros' number-two person in the UK and part of his 8

organization. There are ties of the Dominion 9

Leadership to the Clinton Foundation and to other known 10

politicians in this country. Just to give you a brief 11

description of how this worked, I'm going to quote from 12

a letter that was written, and I will read that to make 13

sure I get the quotes right. This person was objecting 14

to the United States acquisition of is he Sequoia 15

Voting Systems by Smartmatic, a foreign owned company: 16

17

"I believe this transaction raises exactly the 18

sort of foreign ownership issues that Cepheus is 19

best positioned to examine for national security 20

purposes. It's undisputed that Smartmatic is 21

foreign-owned and that it has acquired Sequoia." 22

23

They keep changing the names as they go along. 24

Different times, when a problem comes up you can just 25

28

create a different corporation and call it a different 1

name, but it was a voting machine company doing busines 2

in the United States. 3

“Sequoia voting machines were used to record over 4

125,000,000 votes during the 2004 Presidential 5

election in the United States. Smartmatic, now 6

acknowledges that Antonio Mugica, a Venezuelan 7

businessman, has controlling interest in 8

Smartmatic, but the company has not revealed who 9

all the Smartmatic owners are. According to the 10

press, Smartmatic's owners are hidden through a 11

web of offshore private entities, and that is, in 12

fact true. Smartmatic has been associated with 13

the Venezuelan government led by Hugo Chavez, 14

which is openly hostile to the United States.” 15

and of course as we all know communistic and really 16

brutalizing its own people. 17

“The system has been continued there by 18

Mr. Maduro; it insured his election. Smartmatic's 19

possible connection to the Venezuelan government 20

posits a potential national security concern in 21

the context of its acquisition of Sequoia because 22

electronic voting machines are susceptible to 23

tampering and insiders are in the best position to 24

29

engage in such tampering. This letter expresses 1

the concern of the Chicago 2006 primary election. 2

And it ends by saying, 3

“The products and services that are of Venezuelan 4

origin and evaluates Smartmatic's ownership to 5

determine who could have influence and control 6

over these and other Sequoia products and services 7

are important to the national security of the 8

United States.” 9

This letter was written to Hank Paulson on 10

October 6, 2006 by Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney. 11

Senators Klobuchar and Warren have raised these 12

concerns as recently as December 2019. Why our 13

government has not taken them seriously is beyond my 14

comprehension unless some of the three-letter agencies 15

have used them themselves in other parts of the world. 16

We know that the technology was exported to affect an 17

election in Argentina. That's admitted by our friend 18

who wrote the affidavit about Hugo Chavez and his 19

interest in Smartmatic. Again, in 2006, Carolyn 20

Maloney wrote the Honorable John Snow, the Secretary of 21

the Treasury about the issues. 22

Speaking of Smartmatic's leadership, one of 23

Smartmatic's patent holders -- Eric Coomer, I believe 24

his name is -- is on the web as being recorded in a 25

30

conversation with Antifa members saying that he had the 1

election rigged for Mr. Biden, nothing to worry about 2

here. And he was going to -- they were going to 3

"F- Trump." His social media is filled with hatred for 4

the President and For the United States of America as a 5

whole, as are the social media accounts of many other 6

Smartmatic people. 7

There has been widespread use of this. Dominion 8

itself is utilized in 2,000 jurisdictions in 30 states. 9

It has been uncertifiable in multiple states who 10

realized all of the problems that it has including 11

Texas. Experts have described it across the board from 12

a Princeton group of three professors to experts that 13

we've talked to about its end user vulnerabilities. 14

People can admittedly go in and change whatever they 15

want. They can set the ratio of votes from one thing 16

to another. They can say that a Biden vote counts as 17

1.25 and a Trump vote counts .75, and those may be the 18

numbers that were actually used here. 19

It's not just the swing states that were affected. 20

The algorithm was likely run across the country to 21

affect the entire election. Like I said, we only 22

discovered it this year because of the overwhelming 23

number of votes for President Trump in the swing states 24

that caused machines to have to shut down for them to 25

31

backfill for adding votes. We have evidence of 1

different numbers of votes being injected into the 2

system, the same, identical, unique six-digit number 3

multiple times in at least two states that we've 4

analyzed so far, and I'm talking about 341,542 votes 5

for Biden and 100,012 for Trump. There's no 6

explanation, no logical explanation for the same 7

numbers being injected 20 minutes apart into the 8

machine. 9

The software manual itself, you can download it 10

from the internet, and I would encourage you all to 11

read it because it specifically advertises some of 12

these things as features of system. Why it was ever 13

allowed into this country is beyond my comprehension 14

and why nobody has dealt with it as absolutely 15

appalling. The machines were easily accessible to 16

hackers. There's video on the net that will explain to 17

you how a kid with a cell phone can hack one of these 18

voting machines. 19

There's been no oversight of Dominion or its 20

software. Workers in each county were trained by 21

Dominion, but there's no evidence of any monitoring 22

otherwise. We have testimony of different workers 23

admitting that they were trained how to dispose of 24

Trump votes and add Biden votes. The software has a 25

32

feature pursuant to which you can drag and drop any 1

number of batches of votes to the candidate of your 2

choice or simply throw them away, so we have 3

mathematical evidence in a number of states of massive 4

quantities of Trump votes being trashed -- just simply 5

put in the trash like you would in your computer with 6

any file, and Biden votes being injected. That's in 7

addition to the flipping. 8

I mean, it really happens in two ways. There's an 9

algorithm that runs that automatically flips all of the 10

votes and then each operator has the ability to go in, 11

override settings, they can ignore signature, they can 12

ignore the top line of the ballot, they can go down 13

ballot and select who they want to change the results 14

for, The gentleman who founded Smartmatic, there's 15

video of him on the internet explaining that, yes, on 16

at least one occasion he admits they changed a million 17

votes with no problem. 18

Many of the jurisdictions that have had this 19

problem might not have known of the issues, but many 20

did. And I think a full-scale criminal investigation 21

needs to be undertaken immediately by the Department of 22

Justice and by every State's equivalent Attorney 23

General's office or state investigatory unit because 24

there's evidence of different benefits being provided 25

33

to the people who spent $100,000,000 of money at the 1

last minute for their state to get the Dominion voting 2

systems put in in time for election in different ways. 3

There's one person that a lawyer told me got election 4

insurance, meaning that he would be able to make sure 5

he was elected. I'm sure they explained that feature 6

in detail to many people who expressed interest in 7

putting this voting system in. 8

Texas denied certification of the Dominion system 9

in 2019, but there are, no doubt, issues with the 10

software that Texas did use unbeknownst to Texas, I 11

would imagine, since they went to great trouble to 12

examine the Dominion systems and reject them, but other 13

software in the source code that does the alterations 14

is embedded, we've been told, in the source code all 15

across the country in all the voting machines. There's 16

no doubt it has been used to alter elections in other 17

countries. We know specifically that Venezuela 18

exported it for that purpose to Argentina and other 19

Latin American countries to make sure that the corrupt 20

rulers who were willing to pay the highest price for 21

being in office were allowed to rig their elections. 22

This is stunning, heart-breaking, infuriating, and 23

the most unpatriotic acts I can even imagine for people 24

in this country to have participated in, in any way, 25

34

shape, or form, and I want the American public to know 1

right now that we will not be intimidated. American 2

patriots are fed up with the corruption from the local 3

level to the highest level of our government, and we 4

are going to take this country back. We're not going 5

to be intimidated. We're not going to back down. We 6

are going to clean this mess up now. President Trump 7

won by a landslide. We're going to prove it, and we're 8

going to reclaim the United States of America for the 9

people who vote for freedom. 10

11

JENNA ELLIS: My name is Jenna Ellis and I'm a senior 12

legal advisor to the Trump campaign and I'd like to 13

just explain now where we've been and where we're at, 14

and what you can expect from this process. 15

So, what you have heard, I'm sure, in the fake 16

newspapers tomorrow will be one of two things, either 17

there was not sufficient evidence that we've presented, 18

or we spoke too long. Okay, so what you've heard now is 19

basically an opening statement. This is what you can 20

expect to see when we get to court to actually have a 21

full trial on the merits, to actually show this 22

evidence in court and prove our case. This is not a 23

Law and Order episode where everything is neatly 24

wrapped up in 60 minutes. 25

35

For those of you who are here in this room or have 1

maybe tuned out in other networks, clearly, you've 2

never been court reporters. Trials take time. Putting 3

on evidence takes time. This is basically an opening 4

statement so the American people can understand what 5

the networks have been hiding and what they refuse to 6

cover, because all of your fake news headlines are 7

dancing around the merits of this case and are trying 8

to delegitimize what we're doing here. 9

Let me be very clear that our objective is to make 10

sure to preserve and protect election integrity. 11

President Trump has been saying from day one that this 12

is about maintaining free and fair elections in this 13

country. It is not about overturning an outcome. It 14

is about making sure that election integrity is 15

preserved, and every American should want that. If 16

every American is not onboard with that you have to ask 17

yourself why. And if your fake news network is not 18

covering this, or allowing you cover it fairly and 19

accurately, you should ask yourself why. It is 20

absolutely a legitimate legal basis. 21

We have been asked to provide an entire case that 22

generally would take years in civil litigation. I've 23

been a prosecutor. I have tried cases with far simpler 24

36

facts. One thing happened in a matter of minutes and 1

it still takes days. And we go through a jury process. 2

This is the court of public opinion right now. We 3

are not trying our case in the court of public opinion, 4

because if we were, we would get unbiased jurors. I 5

would strike 99% of you from the jury and I would be 6

allowed to because of the fake news coverage you 7

provide. You're not unbiased jurors and until you step 8

out of your role as a journalist and actually go into a 9

courtroom and you are a judge on a bench that has sworn 10

an oath to be unbiased in our separation of powers, 11

then your opinion does not matter. The facts matter; 12

the truth matters, and if you are fair reporters, you 13

will cover that fairly and appropriately and you will 14

allow coverage of our media team and our legal team. 15

That is absolutely shocking that all you cover are 16

around the margins. And I've seen all of you taking 17

pictures right now, and I anticipate what your 18

headlines are going to be. If you are not willing to 19

talk about the evidence that has been presented, then 20

that is absolutely unacceptable for journalistic 21

standards. This is an opening statement. This is 22

something where we have told you what the evidence will 23

show. And we have given you a brief description. That 24

happens in a courtroom all the time where that's not 25

37

the fact-finding process, that is just an overview. 1

That is what we have given you today because the 2

American people deserve to know what we have uncovered 3

in the last couple of weeks. 4

Remember, this is such a short time frame, and 5

this is an elite strike force team that is working on 6

behalf of the President and the campaign to make sure 7

that our constitution is protected. We are a nation of 8

rules, not a nation of rulers. There is not someone 9

that just gets to pick who the next President is 10

outside of the will of the American people. 11

And that is our task, because when we talk about 12

voter fraud, it's actually election official fraud. 13

That cannot stand. The constitution requires that the 14

state legislatures are the ones that make election law. 15

It still has to go by the US Constitution, but what has 16

happened in this case is that state and local level 17

officials and all the way up, have changed the rules. 18

That's what the Democrats do if they don't like the 19

rules -- they change them, and they change them at the 20

last minute. They manipulate them, they want to tear 21

down our American system. 22

Our founders were so brilliant that they 23

anticipated this, that there would be corruption, there 24

would be foreign influence, there would be attempts to 25

38

manipulate the outcome of the election, especially with 1

who they called our Chief Magistrate. I would encourage 2

you to go home and actually read Alexander Hamilton 3

Federalist 68 and see what he described as an advocacy 4

position to adopt and ratify the electoral college and 5

the process by which we select our President. We 6

select our President through the electoral college not 7

because it disenfranchises voters but because it is a 8

security mechanism for exactly the type of corruption 9

that we're uncovering. And every American should be 10

grateful and thankful that our founders had the 11

foresight to put in those protections and provisions to 12

make sure that your legitimate, legal vote is not 13

disenfranchised. That is what we're advocating for. 14

We want to make sure to protect election integrity 15

and your president -- President Trump -- we are so 16

proud that he is in this fight, because he understands 17

that when he swore his oath of office, he swore an oath 18

to uphold and defend the United States Constitution. 19

That is what he is doing and that is what we are doing. 20

We're confident that through this multiple pathways to 21

victory, we will get to the actual outcome that the 22

evidence shows. But this is not about overturning an 23

election on our part, it's about making sure that we 24

39

protect and preserve free and fair elections for all 1

future American elections. 2

If the United States caves to corruption or this 3

type of election integrity disaster, then no election 4

will be secure from here on out, and we all need to be 5

keenly aware of that. We are the representatives here 6

that are standing in this gap and defending President 7

Trump and defending you, the American people at the end 8

of the day. This is ultimately about the United States 9

of America and we want to make sure to protect and 10

defend that, and as my colleagues have said, we will 11

not back down. We won't be intimidated. President Trump 12

will not be intimidated. You, the American people 13

should not be intimidated. 14

You, the press, should cover this fairly and 15

should know that this matters to election integrity and 16

it matters to the future of our nation. So, we've 17

given you an overview, but recognize this is not a 18

court of law. We will get there, and we have time, and 19

we have constitutional provisions that will step in 20

when we show the corruption and the irredeemably 21

challenged and overturned votes that are absolutely 22

corrupt in all of these counties. It is irredeemably 23

compromised. We will show that, but you have to give 24

us that opportunity. This has been just our opening 25

40

statement, and we have an opportunity to get there, and 1

we have time, and we will do that. This is the United 2

States of America and we stand proudly for President 3

Donald J. Trump. Thank you. 4

5

SIDNEY POWELL: The world is watching this. I have 6

gotten multiple emails from people in other countries 7

who watched the same pattern happen there. We have 8

witness testimony that the same things were done in 9

those countries as this was exported from Venezuela and 10

by Maduro and by Mr. Chavez and by Cuba, and of course 11

we know China also has a substantial presence in 12

Venezuela and substantial interest in making sure that 13

President Trump does not continue in office. 14

This is the consummate foreign interference in our 15

election, in the most criminal way you possibly 16

imagine. It must be shut down. We know, for example, 17

that one of the Dominion's highest level employees, or 18

officers, went to Detroit himself to man the Detroit 19

operation center where he could watch the votes coming 20

in real time and decide what file folder in the system 21

to put those votes into. That's why you see massive 22

spikes after hours when people were told that all the 23

votes were in and all the votes were counted. 24

41

Many Dominion employees have already reached out 1

to us to tell us the truth. They are Americans who 2

want to ensure election integrity like we do. I would 3

encourage every Dominion or Smartmatic employee who is 4

fed up with the corruption in this country to come 5

forward as soon as possible because these are serious 6

federal offenses that I'm confident the Department of 7

Justice will be in pursuit of in very short order if 8

they are not already. 9