elmeco4_325-331

Upload: luis900000

Post on 03-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 elmeco4_325-331

    1/7

    -325-

    Lub

    linU

    niversityofTechnolo

    gy

    I E E E

    4th International Conference ELMECO

    Naczw, PolandSeptember 2003

    COMPUTATIONAL SOLUTIONS OF STEADY AND

    TRANSIENT STATES IN TRANSFORMERS USING FEM

    Dariusz CZERWISKI, Ryszard GOLEMAN, Leszek JAROSZYSKI

    Institute of Electrical Engineering and Electrotechnologies,Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38A, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

    e-mail: [email protected]

    Abstract

    Electromagnetic Field Theory is often perceived as one of the most difficult

    subjects of electrical engineering. Difficulties arise from a very complex mathematical

    background. Necessity of some simplifications and idealisations of analysed objects

    takes place. The investigation of real live electromagnetic systems, where

    phenomenological interpretation of obtained results is the most important, requires

    some modern numerical methods placed in user-friendly operational environment. The

    Finite Element Method (FEM) gives very versatile and powerful solution of that

    problem. However, despite its advantages, its usage is relatively expensive and difficult

    especially for slightly experienced users. Progress in the software development enabled

    a significant simplification of the user interface in packages and made FEM veryattractive for every PC user.

    Keywords: electromagnetic field, transformers.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Electromagnetic Field Theory is often perceived as one of the most difficult subjects

    of electrical engineering. Difficulties arise from a very complex mathematical background.

    Necessity of some simplifications and idealisations of analysed objects takes place. The

    investigation of real live electromagnetic systems, where phenomenological interpretation

    of obtained results is the most important, requires some modern numerical methods placed

    in user-friendly operational environment. The Finite Element Method (FEM) gives very

    versatile and powerful solution of that problem. However, despite its advantages, its usageis relatively expensive and difficult especially for slightly experienced users [1, 2]. Progress

    in the software development enabled a significant simplification of the user interface in

    packages and made FEM very attractive for every PC user.

  • 7/29/2019 elmeco4_325-331

    2/7

    -326-

    2. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

    Problems of the single phase transformer with ferromagnetic core, set of parallel

    current conducting strips and three phase transformer with five legs ferromagnetic core

    were solved as a samples of FEM computer aided solutions. Numerical models of these

    problems have been built. Firs and second one were solved using QuickField software [3]

    and the last one using FLUX2D package [4].

    3. MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD ANALYSIS

    The problem of a single-phase transformer has been the example of computer aided

    computations of magnetic field (Fig. 1). The transformer consists of low voltage and high

    voltage windings wounded on a ferromagnetic core. The core is made of a transformer plate

    (ET-6). Computations assume the plane geometry and a simplified mathematical model thatassumes the isotropy of the core, the uniform distribution of current density in a cross-

    section of each winding. Moreover, power losses in the core and insulation are neglected.

    Fig. 1. Right upper corner of a single-phase transformer.

    Current densities in the low voltage winding and in the high voltage winding are

    Jn = 1.5106 A/m2 and Jw = 0.99810

    6 A/m2, respectively. The magnetic field generated in

    the transformer can be expressed by means of the non-linear Poissons equation in a currentarea

    zzz Jy

    A

    yx

    A

    x )

    1()

    1(

    (1)

    and the Laplaces equation in a non-current area

    0)1

    ()1

    ( y

    A

    yx

    A

    x

    zz

    (2)

  • 7/29/2019 elmeco4_325-331

    3/7

    -327-

    where: Az - a vector magnetic potential component normal to the model cross-section,

    Jz - current density, - medium magnetic permeability.

    The mathematical model assumes Neumanns boundary conditions along the axes OXand OY because of the symmetry

    0n

    Az

    (3)

    and the Dirichlets condition Az = 0 on the other edges where magnetic fields areneglectable.

    Fig. 2. Magnetic flux distribution and field

    lines in a single phase transformer.

    Fig. 3. Magnetic density distribution and

    field lines in a single phase transformer.

    This vector magnetic potential distribution enables computations of magnetic field

    intensity (Fig. 2) and magnetic density (Fig. 3) in the whole area. Magnetic density values

    reach 1.63 T in straight line segments but in the corner is much smaller because of the

    bigger cross-section of a magnetic core.

    The influence of a transformer tank on the field distribution in the transformer has

    been analyzed. The results indicate that if the transformer is placed in the ferromagnetic

    tank the outflow of the magnetic leakage is different. Some part of this flux is closed with

    the tank wall, which reflects in the comparison between the distributions of Hx component.

    4. THREE PHASE TRANSFORMER WITH FIVE LIMB CORE

    The numerical model of the power transformer of 250 MVA was assumed. This model

    is based on real transformer build for industrial purposes. Calculations were made for

    unsteady and steady states with fixed time step equal 0.001 s. Transient magnetic problem

    was coupled with circuit analysis. High and low voltage windings of the transformer areconnected in star and stabilizing winding is connected in delta Fig. 4.

  • 7/29/2019 elmeco4_325-331

    4/7

    -328-

    Fig. 4. Connection diagram of the windings of the transformer.

    Vector potential in our model is given by equation (4)

    zzzz A

    dt

    dJ

    y

    A

    yx

    A

    x

    )

    1()

    1( (4)

    which is coupled with equations of an electrical transformer circuit.

    0

    CBA

    CHVBHVCCBBCB

    CHVAHVCCAACA

    iii

    dt

    d

    dt

    diRiRee

    dt

    d

    dt

    diRiRee

    (5)

    0

    )()(

    )()(

    1111

    1111

    cba

    cc

    bbcccLVbbbLV

    cLVbLV

    cc

    aacccLVaaaLV

    cLVaLV

    iii

    dt

    diL

    dt

    diLiRRiRR

    dt

    d

    dt

    d

    dt

    diL

    dt

    diLiRRiRR

    dt

    d

    dt

    d

    (6)

  • 7/29/2019 elmeco4_325-331

    5/7

    -329-

    022222

    2222

    222

    2222

    2222

    2222

    dt

    diLiR

    dt

    diLiR

    dt

    diLiR

    iRiRiRdt

    d

    dt

    d

    dt

    d

    dt

    diLiRiR

    dt

    d

    dt

    diLiRiR

    dt

    d

    dt

    diLiRiR

    dt

    d

    cccc

    bbbb

    aaaa

    cCWcCWbCWbCWaCWaCWcCWbCWaCW

    cccccCWcCW

    cCW

    bbbbbCWbCW

    bCW

    aaaaaCWaCW

    aCW

    (7)

    where: - magnetic flux linkage with winding dependent on subscript, a, b, c - low

    and middle voltage phases, A, B, C - high voltage phases, LV - low voltage windings,

    HV - high voltage windings, CW - stabilizing windings, R - resistance of windings,

    L - inductance of windings, Ra1, Rb1, Rc1, Ra2, Rb2, Rc2 - loads resistance of the LV windings

    and CW windings, La1, Lb1, Lc1, La2, Lb2, Lc2 - loads inductance of the LV windings and CW

    windings.

    Magnetic core of the transformer is made of ET6 laminations. Ratio of the yoke to

    main limb surfaces in our model is equal 0.58. Surfaces of the extreme yokes and limbs are

    reduced to 0.43 of the corresponding main limb.

    Rated power of the transformer is 250 MVA and for stabilizing winding is 50 MVA.

    Delta voltage of the high and low voltage windings is equal 400 kV and respectively

    123 kV. Phase to phase voltage of the stabilizing winding is equal 31.5 kV.

    Fig. 5. Currents in the transformer

    primary windings.

    Fig. 6. Time characteristic of the flux density in

    the middle limb of the transformer.

  • 7/29/2019 elmeco4_325-331

    6/7

    -330-

    a)

    b)

    Fig. 7. Comparison of the flux density distribution in the core of the transformer at different

    time steps: a) t=0.1925s, b) t=0.1955s.

    Obtained results enable us to tell, that unsteady state lasts until time is equal 0.3 s.

    Supplying voltage of the transformer is sinusoidal with constant amplitude. Currents in theprimary windings of the transformer are also sinusoidal however after the switching in

    current waveforms appear the transient terms (Fig. 5). Waveforms and distribution of the

    magnetic flux density in the middle limb and transformer are shown at the Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.

    From Fig. 8 and Fig. 9, we can see that waveforms of the flux density in the external limbs

    and voltage on the inductance of the low voltage load are distorted and they consist the

    transient terms.

  • 7/29/2019 elmeco4_325-331

    7/7

    -331-

    Fig. 8. Flux density in the external limb

    of the transformer.

    Fig. 9. Voltage on the inductance

    of the low voltage load.

    5. CONCLUSION

    The new generation of FEM software with an integrated, user-friendly programming

    environment greatly facilities Finite Element Analysis of electromagnetic systems for

    tutorial and professional applications. We have to care about the geometry and shapes of

    finite elements because of accuracy of the FEM.

    Computational model of the transformer can be used in solution of additional winding

    losses.

    Model of parallel strips with ferromagnetic plate enables to obtain distribution of the

    magnetic field and value of the eddy current losses.

    The presented numerical model of the five limb transformer permits to determine

    multidimensional calculations at the both transient and steady state. It is possible to change

    the dimensions of our model e.g.: limbs, yokes and windings during calculations.

    Required values of the flux density in the limbs and yokes can be obtained due tomodification of the ratio of the limbs to yokes cross-sections.

    Stabilizing winding connected in delta provides to the transformer odd harmonics of

    the order of 3n and permits pure waveform of the magnetic flux density in the main yokes.

    Waveforms of the flux density in the external limbs and yokes are distorted.

    REFERENCES

    [1] S. Bolkowski, M. Stabrowski, J. Skoczylas, J. Sroka, J. Sikora, S. Wincenciak,

    Komputerowe metody analizy pola elektromagnetycznego, Warszawa, WNT,1993.

    [2] D. S. Burnett, Finite Element Analysis, From Concepts to Applications, Addison-

    Wesley Publishing Company, 1988.

    [3] Students' QuickField - Finite Element Analysis System, V. 3.4 - User's Guide, Tera

    Analysis, 1995.

    [4] FLUX2D V. 7.20, Users Guide, CEDRAT, August 1996.