emergency contraception: an important part of primary care julie fagan, m.d. 23 february 2005
TRANSCRIPT
Learning Objectives
• Understand why emergency contraception is important in primary care
• List the types of and effectiveness rate for various types of EC
• Be able to prescribe EC and counsel women about risks, benefits, alternatives
• Discuss with patients and prescribe EC in advance, to enhance effectiveness
Emergency contraception
• ½ of all pregnancies in the US are unintended About 3.2 million/year~25,000 of which result from sexual assault
• ½ of those end in abortion~ 1.5 million
• Conservatively, EC could prevent ½ of unintended pregnancies
~ 1.5 million
• Over 700,000 abortions could be avoided per year
What is emergency contraception?
• Emergency contraception is NOT medical abortion: it does not cause abortion/miscarriage
• Involves using a contraceptive after unprotected intercourse to PREVENT a pregnancy, in the same way oral contraceptives and breastfeeding do (by blocking fertilization or implantation)
• Poses no significant health risk to an existing pregnancy or pregnant woman
• Hormonal and intrusion methods available
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin Foundation Provider EC Education Project (PEEP)
• Educate primary care providers about EC
• Encourage advance prescription of EC by PCPs to minimize use of the ER
• Address perceived barriers to using EC among providers
• Increase EC access to reduce unintended pregnancy
Types of EC commonly used
• Combination estrogen and progestin (Yuzpe method)
• Progestin only
• IUD
Yuzpe method
• Can use regular OCPs or prepackaged Preven (now off the market).
• Most effective within 72 hours after unprotected intercourse
• Two doses of pills, 12 hours apart• Most common side effects are nausea (30-
50%) and vomiting (15-20%)• Should also prescribe an antiemetic
Antiemetic regimens commonly used
• Meclizine– 25-50 mg 1 hour before 1st dose
• Promethazine – 25 mg po or pr 30-60 minutes before each dose
and prn q6-8h
• Trimethobenzamide – 250 mg 1 hour before each dose
Progestin-only
• Usually equals a dose of 0.75mg of Levonorgestrel
• Packaged as “Plan B”• Can also use Ovrette ocps
– Take 20 pills at once
• As effective as Yuzpe method but much lower risk of nausea and vomiting – 23% and 5% respectively
“Plan B”
• Originally prescribed as two doses, 12 hours apart
• 2002 study found that a single dose of 1.5 mg of Levonorgestrel (twice the original dose) is as effective as dividing the dose
• New recommendation: take 2 pills at once
• Lancet 2002;360:1803-10
Side Effects: ECPs
WHO Task Force. Lancet 1998;352:428
Nausea Vomiting
Progestin Only 23% 6%
Combination (Yuzpe) 50% 19%
RR .46 .28
ARHP
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Nausea Vomiting Dizziness Fatigue
Levonorgestrel vs. Yuzpe: Side Effects
LevonorgestrelYuzpe
* Significant at p<0.01
23%
Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Lancet. 1998;352:428-433.
51%*
6%
19%*
11%
17%*
29%*
17%
Contraception online
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Nausea Vomiting Diarrhea Fatigue BreastTenderness
Bleeding MensesDelay >7
Days
Single- vs. Two-Dose Levonorgestrel: Side Effects
Single-Dose Levonorgestrel
Two-Dose Levonorgestrel
14%
von Hertzen H, et al. Lancet. 2002;360:1803-1810.
15%
1% 1%4% 3%
14%
18%
8% 8%
31% 31%
5%
0%
Contraception online
Effectiveness
• Decreases pregnancy rate by 75% if taken within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse– If 100 women have unprotected intercourse
during the middle of their cycles, you expect 8 to get pregnant. If all of the women use EC, only 2 will get pregnant.
– New study shows that may be effective for up to 5 days
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Levonorgestrel Yuzpe
Proportion of Pregnancies Prevented by Levonorgestrel vs. Yuzpe Regimen*
Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Lancet. 1998;352:428-433.
85%85%
71%71%
57%57%
39%39%
93%93%
74%74%
* 95% CI
Contraception online
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
<24 25-48 49-62
Proportion of Pregnancies Prevented by Levonorgestrel vs. Yuzpe, by Timing of Treatment
Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Lancet. 1998;352:428-433.
Levonorgestrel Yuzpe
Timing of Treatment (hours)
58%
31%36%
85%95%
77%
Contraception online
Effectiveness
• Levonorgestrel alone was slightly more effective than estrogen/progestin method
• Single dose Plan B is now the first line method of EC to be used
– Cheng L, et al. Interventions for emergency contraception (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2 2003. Oxford: Update Software.
Emergency Contraceptive Effectiveness
# of Pregnancies % Reduction
No treatment 80
Combined ECPs 20 75%
Progestin-Only ECPs 10 88%
IUD Insertion 1 99%
If 1000 women have unprotected sex once in the second or third week of their cycle
ARHP data
Contraindications
• Pre-existing pregnancy is the only contraindication, due to the ineffectiveness of the method
• May not be appropriate in a woman with an active migraine with neurologic symptoms
Conflicting Contraindications: Combined ECPs
• World Health Organization– Confirmed pregnancy
• Faculty of FP and RH Care (United Kingdom)– Confirmed pregnancy– Migraine at presentation (if Hx of focal migraine)– Past Hx of thromboembolism (relative contraindication)
• Planned Parenthood Federation of America– Suspicion or evidence of established pregnancy
WHO Emergency Contraception: A Guide for Service Delivery 1998Kubba. Emergency Contraception Guidelines for Doctors 1995
PPFA Manual of Medical Standards and Guidelines 1998ARHP data
How do the pills work?
• If taken before ovulation, may disrupt follicular development and maturation, causing either delayed ovulation or anovulation and/or an impaired luteal phase.
• May also decrease endometrial receptivity to implantation and impair corpus luteum function
Other possible mechanisms of action (cont.)
• Cause thick cervical mucus
• Alter tubal transport
• Inhibit fertilization
IUD as EC
• IUD insertion within 5 days of unprotected intercourse is almost 100% effective in preventing a pregnancy.
• Probably interferes with implantation
• May need to use prophylactic antibiotics because same women may be at high risk for sexually transmitted infections
Access to EC in WI—why advance prescription is important
• Only 50% of Wisconsin ERs prescribe EC
• Only 43% of hospitals dispense EC
• 28% of WI hospitals will not prescribe EC to victims of sexual assault
• In hospitals that do not prescribe EC, only 47% will provide a referral
• NARAL, 2002 Wisconsin Reproductive Access Project findings
Advance Prescription: issues
• Does it promote sexual risk taking behavior?
• Does it encourage women to use reliable contraception less?
• Do women use EC as a birth control method?
Results in ScotlandWomen who received ECPs in advance
• Were more likely to use ECPs: – 47% vs. 27% of women who received only counseling
(p<.001)
• Were not more likely to use ECPs repeatedly
• Used other methods of contraception equally well
• Had fewer unintended pregnancies– 3.3% vs 4.8 % for women who received only counseling
(p=0.14)
Glasier and Baird, N Engl J Med 1998;339:1ARHP
Results in San Francisco: Women who received ECPs in advance
• Were more likely to use ECPs– 22% vs 7% of women who received only counseling (p=.006)
• Were not more likely to have unprotected sex
• Were not less likely to use condoms consistently
• Were less likely to use oral contraceptives consistently– 32% vs. 58% of women who received only counseling (p=.03)
Raine et al. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:1ARHP
Randomized trial of advance supply of EC
• Women with advance Rx were 4 times as likely to use EC in the following year (17% vs. 4%)
• No difference in use of effective birth control or consistency of use
• Same incidence of unprotected intercourse: women with Rx were 6 times as likely to use EC
Jackson, et al. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;102:8-16.
Advance Provision of EC: Teens* Prospective randomized trial at urban, hospital-based adolescent clinic
• 301 minority, low-income women age 15-20 years
• Advance provision/Rx vs. instructions on how to get EC
• At 1 month, advance Rx group reported nearly twice as much use as control group
– 15% vs. 8%, p=0.05
• Advance EC group began EC significantly sooner
– 11.4 h vs. 21.8 h, p=0.005
• No detrimental effects on condom or hormonal contraceptive use
• No increase in unprotected intercourseGold MA, et al. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004;17:87-96. Contraception online
Advance Rx vs. Patient request
Women do not know to ask for Advance Rx:
– While 76% of women have heard of ECPs or morning-after pills
– Only 16% of women know 72-hour time frame– Only 2% of women have ever used ECPs
ARHP data
Emergency Contraception OTC• ECPs are available directly from pharmacists
without a prescription in:
–California–Washington State–Hawaii–Maine–New Mexico–Legislation pending in 8 other states
–British Columbia
–France
–United Kingdom
–South Africa
–Portugal
–Belgium
–Albania
–Denmark
–SwedenARHP data
Response to Pharmacy Availability: Washington State
• 10,000 patient visits per year
• 42% of visits were during evenings, weekends, or holidays
• 95% of women had sufficient opportunity to ask questions
• 85% of women were satisfied with the on-going contraceptive counseling provided by pharmacists
• Medicaid projects savings of up to $10 million/year
ARHP data
Emergency Contraception: Rx by Telephone
• 3 questions to ask:
– Have you had unprotected sex or a problem with your birth control (such as condom breakage) during the last 3 days (rule out sexual assault)?
– Did your last menstrual period begin less than 4 weeks ago?
– Was the timing and duration of your last menstrual period normal?
• If the patient responds “yes” to all 3 questions, a clinician may prescribe emergency contraception over the telephone
Adapted from ACOG, Emergency Contraception: A Resource Manual for Providers, 1998. Contraception online
Patient Counseling for EC• Use of antiemetic (Rx or OTC) 1 hour prior to first dose of Yuzpe
• Expected side effects (nausea/vomiting/cramping)
• When to expect menses (up to 98% bleed within 21 days of EC)
• If no menses after 3 weeks, rule out pregnancy
• May discuss future contraceptive needs, STD risk
• How to take medication (give written instructions when possible)
• Assess for sexual assault
LaValleur J. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2000;27(4): 817-839.ACOG Practice Bulletin. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;78:191-198.
Contraception online
Strategies to compensate for conflicting views among partners
• One back up partner on call for EC requests
• Provide advance prescriptions to minimize use of on-call system
• Open communication among call group
Resources: Emergency Contraception
• Hotlines– 1-888-NOT-2-Late or 800-584-9911
• Web Sites– http://www.NOT-2-Late.org
http://www.ec.princeton.edu/– http://www.PREVEN.com– http://kaisernetwork.org– http://cecinfo/html/updates.htm (emergency contraception
newsletters)– http://www.acog.org– http://www.go2ec.org/– http://www.prch.org
Contraception online
Summary:
• EC is a safe, easy-to-use method of preventing pregnancy after unprotected intercourse or sexual assault
• Advance Rx of EC should be a regular part of primary care for women
• Increased advance Rx will significantly reduce unintended pregnancies and abortion
• Advance Rx of EC does not negatively impact use of other birth control or increase unprotected intercourse
• PCPs should lead in making EC more accessible to women through regular and routine advance Rx