emily k. smith, paula misiewicz, keith chaney, david white, dick...

36
Emily K. Smith, Paula Misiewicz, Keith Chaney, David White, Dick Godwin Precision Farming Challenges in the 21 st Century 4 July 2013

Upload: others

Post on 16-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Emily K. Smith, Paula Misiewicz, Keith Chaney, David White, Dick Godwin

    Precision Farming Challenges in the 21st Century

    4 July 2013

  • Deep Tillage Minimum Tillage

    Source: Kroulik et al., 2011

  • Source: Raghavan et al., 1978

  • Source: Chyba, 2012

  • Source: Chyba, 2012

  • Improved operational flexibility

    Simple concept to adopt

    Minimise compaction

    X Still applies pressure to the soil

  • 0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    Pre

    ssu

    re (

    bar

    )

    MachXbib Low

    MachXbib High

    Axiobib Low

    Axiobib High

    Axiobib 1/1.6

    Challenger

    Source: Authors own

    Direction of travel

  • Source: CTF Europe

    Chemical applications – integer multiple of base module

    Base module Track width

  • Benefits Simple concept*

    Soil structure

    Infiltration

    Crop yields “CTF (+LGP) = 10-15% yield improvement”

    Fuel, time and machinery cost savings

    “70% reduction between trafficked & untrafficked”

    GPS guidance and steering

  • X Standardised wheel centres

    X Matching implement widths

    X Maintaining wheel-ways

    X Industry & manufacturing

    limitations

    X GPS investment & reliability

    Limitations

  • To assess alternative traffic & tillage systems in terms of improving and maintaining:

    1) soil structure;

    2) crop growth and yield;

    3) systems performance and economics

  • Long term trials at Harper Adams University

    • Year One: Site assessment and normalisation

    • Year Two (+ Three): Plot Trials

  • 2.1 m wheel centres

    http://www.ellismachinery.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/5346-3.jpg

  • 4 m CTF system

  • TRAFFIC Random Traffic

    Low Ground Pressure

    Controlled Traffic Farming

    TIL

    LAG

    E Deep Deep Deep

    Shallow Shallow Shallow

    Direct Drill Direct Drill Direct Drill

  • 40m

  • TRAFFIC Random Traffic

    Low Ground Pressure

    Controlled Traffic Farming

    TIL

    LAG

    E Deep Deep Deep

    Shallow Shallow Shallow

    Direct Drill Direct Drill Direct Drill

  • 4 metres

    2.1 m

  • 1 2 2 3 3

  • 2 3 1 2 0 3 0

  • 1 2 2 0 1 0

    Shallow Tillage Direct Drilling

    1 0 2 2 0 0

  • • Same total run-over area (%) as RTF

    • BUT….

    TREATMENT

    Random Traffic Farming

    Low Ground Pressure

    TY

    RE

    INFL

    AT

    ION

    R

    PE

    SS

    UR

    E (

    BA

    R)

    Front

    1.2

    0.7

    Rear

    1.5

    0.7

  • 0 0 0 T T

  • TRAFFIC Random Traffic

    Low Ground Pressure

    Controlled Traffic Farming

    TIL

    LAG

    E Deep Deep Deep

    Shallow Shallow Shallow

    Direct Drill Direct Drill Direct Drill

  • Väderstad TopDown Väderstad Rapid

    Deep and Shallow Tillage plots • Deep: 250mm • Shallow: 100mm

    All plots

  • RTF Zero

    RTF Deep RTF Shallow

  • Crop • Growth (NDVI) • Yield • Rooting characteristics • Lodging Soil • Penetrometer resistance • Bulk density • Soil water

    • Neutron probe • Infiltration

    Energy • Fuel usage • Draught force

  • • Soil degradation in agricultural production

    • Traffic management solutions, aided by PA

    tools

    • Robust scientific investigation

    • Watch this space……

  • Paula Misiewicz, Dick Godwin, David White, Keith Chaney and

    all visiting researchers

    The Douglas Bomford Trust, Harper Adams University, Precision Decisions, RDS, SOYL, AS Communications,

    Väderstad, Challenger

    Contact:

    Emily K. Smith

    Crop and Environment Sciences, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8NB

    Email: [email protected]

    Twitter: @emilykate1smith

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]