emotional journeys
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
1/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
1
Emotional Journeys: Teacher Resilience Counts
Qing Gu and Christopher Day
Abstract
Drawing upon findings of a four-year national research project on variations in the work
and lives of teachers in England (AUTHORS, 2007), this paper will provide new empirical
evidence about the nature of resilience in teachers. Although resilience in children has
been well informed by research, among teachers, it remains an under researched area.
The paper thus seeks to contribute to understandings of the factors which influence
teacherscapacities to sustain their resilience in the often uncertain individual, relational
and organisational settings in which they engage their intellectual and emotional energy
with that of their students and colleagues.
Keywords: teacher resilience; teacher commitment; teacher effectiveness; self-efficacy
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
2/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
2
Emotional Journeys: Teacher Resilience Counts
Introduction
To teach, and to teach at ones best over time, had always required resilience. However,
it is now, more than ever before, a necessary part of every teachers capacity for
commitment and effectiveness. Indeed, as successive and persisting government policy
reforms have increased teachers external accountabilities, work complexity and
workload, teaching in the 21st century has become rated as one of the most stressful
professions (PWC, 2001; Nash, 2005).
In an earlier publication (AUTHORS, 2007) we made three research informed conclusions
about teacher resilience: i) it is unrealistic to expect pupils to be resilient if their
teachers, who constitute a primary source of their role models, do not demonstrate
resilient qualities (Henderson and Milstein, 2003); ii) the ability to exercise resilience,
defined as the capacity to continue to bounce back, to recover strengths or spirit
quickly and efficiently in the face of adversity, is closely allied to a strong sense of
vocation, self-efficacy and motivation to teach which are fundamental to sustaining a
commitment to promoting achievement in all aspects of students lives; and iii) a shift in
research focus from teacher stress and burnout to resilience provides a promising
perspective to understand the ways that many teachers manage the intellectual and
emotional demands in their workplace and sustain their motivation and commitment and
the effectiveness of their contributions to the quality of their students learning and
achievements over a career.
Research generally suggests that resilience itself is as an unstable construct (Rutter,
1990; Cicchetti, 1993; Masten et al., 1999) involving psychological, behavioural and
cognitive (academically or professionally) functioning as well as emotional regulation
(Greenberg, 2006; Luthar and Brown, 2007) within a range of personal, professional and
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
3/31
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
4/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
4
vulnerability (Kelchtermans, 1996). Research on these emotional arenas of teaching is,
therefore, important.
It is widely acknowledged that lack of job satisfaction, declining commitment and
burnout, all associated with diminished sense of resilience, negatively influence and
impact on turnover decisions among teachers (Dorman, 2003; Maslach, Schaufeli &
Leiter, 2001; Webb et al., 2004). Leithwood and Beatty (2008), among others, draw
upon a range of theoretical and empirical research which demonstrates how teachers
sense of emotional well being can affect their classroom performance. They highlight the
importance to success of schools which are managed by principals who lead with teacher
emotions in mind, emphasising the need to minimise stress, anxiety and burnout, and
maximise teachers job satisfaction, wellbeing, commitment and engagement. Research
has also identified important associations between teacher commitment and pupil
attainment (AUTHORS, 2007), and the importance of emotional understanding and care
to the wellbeing and capacities of teachers to teach well (Denzin, 1984; Goleman, 1996;
Noddings, 1992). As well as being concerned with recruitment and physical retention,
then, it is important that policy makers should focus upon retaining the commitment,
resilience and effectiveness of the existing majority of the more experienced teachers.
All students in all contexts, as Edwards (2007) argues, deserve to be taught by
enthusiastic, motivated individuals (2007: 11).
There is little in the educational literature which focuses upon associations between
teachers morale, motivation, self-efficacy and the factors which influence these, and
teacher resilience itself. Yet most teachers who survive the first four or five years in the
job remain for a further thirty; and during this period not only will they be subject, as all
are, to the vagaries of the aging process and unanticipated events which may affect the
course of their personal lives (marriage, divorce, illness, the loss of a close relative or
declining health), they will also need to adjust their professional lives as colleagues come
and go, motivations and the demands of students and the processes of working with
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
5/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
5
them become more complex, and conditions of service change.
The presence, forms and relative strength of resilience may vary from person to person
and fluctuate over time, according to the scenarios they meet and their capacities to
manage these successfully within present life and work contexts. Thus, understandings
of the central role of work conditions in supporting and enabling teachers to manage the
interactions between work and life over the course of a career and in different contexts
are likely to provide a better understanding of the factors that enable or do not enable
teachers to sustain their hope, optimism and sense of effectiveness in the profession;
and through these contribute to knowledge of reasons for variations in teacher quality,
retention and effectiveness.
There is, therefore, an urgent need for research which investigates whether external and
internal demands and challenges for teachers working in different contexts and in
different professional life phases have dimmed their sense of commitment, if so, how,
and, more importantly, the ways in which their resilience, and ultimately their long term
commitment and effectiveness, may be nurtured, developed and sustained over time
and in different contexts.
Resilience: Advances in Understandings
Interest in resilience originated in the disciplines of psychiatry and developmental
psychology as a result of a burgeoning attention to personal characteristics or traits that
enabled some children, having been classified as being at risk of having negative life
outcomes, to adapt positively and thrive (Howard et al., 1999; Waller, 2001). Although
resilience among children has been well studied by researchers from multiple disciplines,
there remains little consensus about its definitions, particularly in terms of measurement
of its key constructs and its operationalization (Luthar et al., 2000). From a chronological
perspective, the decade of 1980s marked a paradigmatic change to the concept of
resilience, from one which focussed upon understanding the pain, struggle and suffering
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
6/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
6
involved in the adaptation process in the face of adversity, to one which focused more on
understanding positive qualities and strengths (Gore and Eckenrode, 1994, Henderson
and Milstein, 2003). In the first decade of this century, the focus of resilience research in
the disciplines of social and behavioural sciences has shifted from identifying personal
traits and protective factors to investigating how understanding such factors may
contribute to positive outcomes (Luthar et al., 2000). Since the turn of this century,
also, groundbreaking advances in biology research have provided powerful evidence of
the robust effects of early caregiving environments and thus promising and compelling
arguments for the kinds of interventions which are likely to make a difference (Luthar
and Brown, 2007; see also Curtis and Cicchetti, 2003; Cicchetti and Valentino, 2006).
Despite this diversity in approaches to researching resilience, a critical overview of
empirical findings from different disciplines over time suggests that there are indeed
shared core considerations in the way resilience is conceptualised. First and foremost,
resilience presupposes the presence of threat to the status quo. It is a positive response
to conditions of significant adversity (Masten and Garmezy, 1985; Masten et al., 1990;
Cicchetti & Garmezy, 1993; Luthar et al., 2000). Secondly, resilience is not a quality that
is innate or fixed. Rather, it can be learned and acquired (Higgins, 1994). Associated
with this is that third consideration that the personal characteristics, competences and
positive influences of the social environment in which the individual works and lives,
independently and together interact to contribute to the process of resilience building
(Gordon et al., 2000; Rutter, 2006; Zucker, 2006). Indeed, Luthar et al. (2000) assert
that the term resilienceshould always be used when referring to a dynamicprocess or
phenomenon of competence which encompassespositive adaptation within the context
of significant adversity (2000: 554). There is compelling research evidence, for
example, which suggests that children with positive adaptational profiles are able to
maintain long-term high functioning in life (Wener 1994; Egeland et al., 1993; Cowen et
al., 1997; Luthar et al., 2000). This process involves a developmental progression, such
that new vulnerabilities and/or strengths often emerge with changing life circumstances
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
7/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
7
(Luthar et al., 2000: 544).
Thus, resilience is now acknowledged to be a relative, multidimensional and
developmental construct (Rutter, 1990, Howard et al., 1999, Luthar et al., 2000). It is a
phenomenon which is influenced by individual circumstance, situation and environment
and which involves far more complex components than specific personal accounts of
internal traits or assets alone claim. It is not a static state because there is no question
that all individuals resilient or otherwise show fluctuations over time within particular
adjustment domains (Luthar et al., 2000: 551). The nature and extent of resilience is
best understood, then, as a dynamic within a social system of interrelationships (Benard,
1995; Luthar et al., 2000) and this is particularly relevant to understandings of resilience
among adults over their work and life span.
In their review of multi-disciplinary research on maximizing resilience, Luthar and Brown
(2007) critiqued the existing research on resilience in adults and identified five key
issues for consideration in future research:
Firstly, definitions of adultsresilience should be expanded to consider significantothers judgments of their competence and responsiveness in major life roles
(2007: 941). Whether the person is doing well should be defined and judged by
the individuals themselves as well as by others.
Secondly, in line with the developmental theories for childrens resilience, adultresilience should also be conceptualised as (a) sustained positive adjustment
following traumas and (b) recovery displayed after initial maladjustment following
negative life events(2007: 948).
Thirdly, it is inaccurate to imply that resilience resides largely within the personor personal attributes, as claimed in the adult literature. The impact of external
assets, such as supportive relationships, on the strength and sustainability of
resilience is too important to miss in conceptualising resilience in adults.
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
8/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
8
Fourthly, the adult literature on resilience needs to be more cautious aboutoffering claims about the prevalence or rates of resilience because this depends
on the criteria used to define resilience.
Finally, more attention should be paid to contextual influences in resilienceresearch among adults.
They further suggest that future research on resilience among both children and adults
must
move beyond just adding to an already long list of protective factors or
processes, including psychological attributes such as positive emotions,
optimism, cognitive flexibility, and locus of control and now biological
processes The need of the day is to focus, in a concerted way, on
pinpointing risk modifiers that could have the most far-reaching impact on
only on their own (i.e., with relatively substantial effect sizes), but also with
the potential to generate other protective process (as secure attachments
promote feelings of efficacy, internal locus of control, and even intellectual
and academic competence)
(2007: 947)
The research with teachers on which this paper is based takes account of these
considerations through adopting multi-perspective approaches.
Mapping the Territory: Building Resilience in Three Interrelated Settings
Teacherswork takes place in individual, relational and organisational settings. The
nature of these and the ways in which they interact, together with those of the wider
social and cultural structures in which these settings are located, influence who teachers
are (i.e. their identities) and the ways in which they work. Resilience in teachers is at
least in part influenced positively and negatively by organisational culture and, within
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
9/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
9
this, the quality of relationships in classrooms and staffrooms. We have written about
this in more detail elsewhere (AUTHORS, 2007). Thus, a change in the nature of the
work context (e.g. a change of principal, colleagues or class member(s)) may have
profound positive or negative effects on the characteristics of the work environments
which either promote or impair teachers professional competence to maintain
effectiveness in the classroom and the school. For example, persisting challenges in
meeting externally imposed standards of attainment for students will require greater
capacity to maintain resilience than where these challenges are temporary (e.g. perhaps
because of the difference in ability between one group or another). Teachers working in
schools in socio-economically disadvantaged communities may be at higher risk of
suffering from stress and vulnerability than their peers in less challenging circumstances.
It is clear, then, that teachers resilience, commitment and wellbeing must be examined
and understood in terms of particular school and classroom contexts and cultures.
Provision of professional and personal support from school leaders and collegial
relationships among the staff are shown to play a critical role in fostering their sense of
vocation, commitment and competence and enabling them to continue to do the best
they can for their students (AUTHORS, 2007). It is, therefore, important to examine the
nature and expression of teacher resilience within these settings and through these,
explore associations between their capacity to be resilient and their perceived
effectiveness in the profession.
The study
The empirical data which provide illustrations of the three interactional aspects of
resilience individual, relational and organisational are drawn from a four-year large
scale mixed methods research project involving 300 teachers in 100 primary and
secondary schools in England (AUTHORS, 2006). The key aim of the project was to
investigate variations in teachers work, lives and effectiveness and identify factors that
contribute to the variations. The research recognised that effectiveness involves both
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
10/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
10
teachers perceptions of their own effectiveness and their impact on students progress
and attainments.
The main data concerning perceived effectiveness were collected through twice yearly
semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with all the teachers. These were supplemented
at various stages of the research by document analysis and interviews with school
leaders and groups of students. Measures of teachers relative effectiveness as
expressed through improvements in students progress and attainment were collected
through matching baseline test results at the beginning of the year with students
national curriculum results at the end. This enabled differences in the relative value
added to be analysed, using multi-level statistical techniques that included adjustment
for individual background factors as well as prior attainment. Detailed holistic portraits of
teachers work and lives over time were constructed to see whether patterns emerged
over a 3-year period in terms of perceived and relative effectiveness vary and, if so,
why.
In this work teachers were found to have common characteristics and concerns
according to six phases of their professional lives 0-3, 4-7, 8-15, 16-23, 24-30 and
31+ years of teaching. Within each of these groupings there were those whose perceived
commitment was being sustained and others whose commitment was declining. Self-
efficacy and a sense of agency were found to be fundamental to motivation and
commitment. The research suggested that these can be adversely affected not only by
external change demands but also personal and school-specific factors. Both in teachers
minds, and in the measured progress and attainment of their pupils, commitment was
shown to be closely associated with teachers resilience, wellbeing and effectiveness
(AUTHORS, 2006 and 2007).
Of the 300 teachers in the study, 218 (73%) were able to sustain relatively positive
identities across all professional life phases over the three-year period of the fieldwork.
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
11/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
11
However, in each phase there were a number who did not. Comments relating to their
professional, situated and personal scenarios suggest that many teachers were working
under considerable persistent and negative pressures and that, depending upon
professional life phase and school context, these were largely connected to relationships
with school leadership and colleagues, deteriorating pupil behaviour and attitudes, lack
of parental support, the effects of government policies and unanticipated life events.
For those who managed to sustain their positive professional identities and commitment,
staff collegiality was reported as the most important contributing factor. Around 75% or
more of highly committed teachers in each of the six professional life phases rated
supportive relationships with their colleagues as a positive critical influence on their
capacity to maintain positive emotions and a sense of vocation (AUTHORS, 2010).
Additionally, leadership recognition and support was also shown as a key influence.
Between 58% and 93% of highly committed teachers across the six professional life
phases emphasised the important contribution of professional and personal leadership
support to their positive wellbeing and effectiveness (AUTHORS, 2010).
What follows is an illustration of the ways through which one mid career teacher
managed to maintain her ability to sustain her self-efficacy, commitment and sense of
effectiveness in the face of setbacks and challenges. Whilst the experiences of this
teacher are not representative of the whole sample, her profile is typical of the teachers
within her professional life phase, of the key individual, relational and organisational
factors that impacted on their work and lives, and of the ways they managed these in
order to sustain their motivation and commitment in the face of adversity.
Portrait of a Resilient Teacher: Sustaining resilience, commitment and
effectiveness against the odds
Katherine, 37 years old, was Head of English in an 11-16 medium size comprehensive
school. Her school was situated in an urban community of socio-economic disadvantage
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
12/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
12
which had a well above average proportion (23%) of pupils on the special educational
needs register. She had been teaching in this school for three years, having previously
worked in two others. She was eight months pregnant when she had begun the job, and
inherited a Department that had been without a leader for two years.
Individual resilience
Katherine came from a teaching family. She entered teaching because she found it
stimulating. She had a deep interest in her subject and also loved the opportunity to be
able to help children learn. Having been in teaching for 14 years, she felt that such
passion for teaching still applied.
She described herself as a career-driven person. Her motivation was very high when
she first joined her current school. She enjoyed her responsibilities as Head of English,
her new baby and new house, and appreciated the support of her partner who gave her
space to do work at home. However, there was times when her workload volume and
complexity became too intense: as when her school was undergoing a national
inspection. An external inspection of the school worked against her effectiveness and
confidence as a teacher. She was exhausted and overloaded and experienced a crisis of
confidence. She felt a loss of control and as a result she lamented that she did not really
feel that good as a teacher.
My motivation has never wavered, but my effectiveness has. Despite being
totally overworked, I am now feeling positive about September. My confidence
as a classroom teacher, however, is low at the moment. . I need time to
consolidate and need a personal confidence boost from somewhere.
Katherine suffered from serious tensions at home such that she even considered moving
to part-time work. She realised that with two children and a full-time job, her social life
had gone completely out the window. Working all weekend and during holiday times
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
13/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
13
was, for her, a reality. Nonetheless, her commitment to teaching had remained high.
Over time she learned to use a variety of strategies to manage, cope and maintain her
sense of effectiveness at work.
Relational resilience
Katherine described pupils in her current school as a breath of fresh air. She established
good relationships and felt that her positive attitude towards them helped her teaching.
However, she lamented that the parents did not have high enough expectations oftheir
children.
When she first took over the role as Head of Department, Katherine felt that there was
not a team. This was because prior to her arrival, there had been an acting Head of
Department and over this time there had also been curriculum changes. She was
ambitious to foster team spirit through modelling and sharing good practice but wished
that she had more time to pull everyone together. Nevertheless, she enjoyed good
relationships with her colleagues which were particularly important to her during the
school inspection. Support from her colleagues also helped her to restore her self
confidence.
Organisational resilience: sustaining commitment and effectiveness in her current school
When Katherine first joined her current school, she was full of enthusiasm and felt that
her effectiveness rose rapidly. Her job satisfaction fluctuated over the year but she
concluded that that was mainly because she was still a newcomer to the school.
Katherine felt that the structure and the senior leadership of the school made an
important contribution in helping her survive and succeed, particularly during her early
period in the school. If something is passed on through the system, it will be dealt with
very quickly. So you know youve got back up. She greatly appreciated the professional
and personal support she received from the principal which helped her survive through
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
14/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
14
and achieve a good result from the school inspection. She had been expecting her
second child during that period and commented that I think if it hadnt been for the
intervention of the head and his support, I think I probably would have had a nervous
breakdown. The person-centred school culture also helped in that it brought the whole
staff together as a team.
The inspection which had caused so much concern to Katherine had resulted in highly
positive results in the end and this had boosted her confidence, pride and added
motivation. Katherine felt that that she had been recovering since then and had
successfully rebuilt her confidence and reinforced her positive relationships with
colleagues. After having recovered from a dip in her sense of effectiveness during those
difficult times, then, she was now considering taking on management training to prepare
herself for further promotion.
Discussion
Individual resilience: teachers vocational selves
Palmer (1998) proposed three important interwoven paths in the inner landscape of the
teaching self: intellectual, emotional and spiritual. He explained that the teachers inner
quest to help pupils learn, their feelings and emotions which promote or hinder the
relationships between them and their pupils and their hearts longing to be connected
with the work of teaching form the essence of their inner terrain. In developing his view,
we argue that a key notion that connects the three paths of the teachers inner world is
that of vocation or calling. The testimony of the four teachers in Hansens classic study
(1995) suggests that teaching as a vocation presupposes many of the meanings
characteristically associated with helping others learn and improve themselves
intellectually and morally (1995: 15).
Like Katherine, many VITAE teachers had a strong calling to teach and continued to
enjoy working with children and watching them grow. In her study of American high
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
15/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
15
school teachers, Nieto (2003) found that to be able to learn and develop in a learning
community serves as an important incentive that keeps teachers going in the
contemporary contexts of teaching. Margolis (2008) also concluded in a study which
sought to make sense of the complexities of teachers careers in light of changes in
social and economic forces, that opportunities which promote teachers learning and
enable them to share their gifts with others in the profession keep good teachers
teaching (2008: 160-161). Teachers inner vocational drive, as Hansen (1995) observes,
turns the focus of perception in such a way that the challenges and the complexities in
teaching become sources of interestin the work, rather than barriers or frustrating
obstacles to be overcome (1995: 144).
Katherines story illustrates that to maintain their individual resilience, teachers
need an enduring optimistic sense of personal efficacy (Bandura, 1989: 1176).
Rutter (1990) describes self-efficacy as one of the very robust predictors of
resilience. Hoy and Spero (2005) locate teachers sense of efficacy in their
confidence about their abilities to promote students learning (2005: 343). These
self-judgements and beliefs affect the effort teachers invest in teaching, their level
of aspiration, the goals they set (Hoy and Spero, 2005: 345). Bandura (1997) also
argues thatpeople must have a robust sense of personal efficacy to sustain the
perseverant effort needed to succeed (1989: 1176).
When faced with obstacles, setbacks, and failures, those who doubt their
capabilities slacken their efforts, give up, or settle for mediocre solutions.
Those who have a strong belief in their capabilities redouble their effort to
master the challenges.
(Bandura, 2000: 120)
Relational resilience: drawing strength from each other
In positive psychology, particular attention has been given to the importance of
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
16/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
16
relationship-based assets and their contribution to resilience (Masten, 2001; Gorman,
2005; Luthans et al., 2007). Luthar (2006) posits that Resilience rests, fundamentally,
on relationships (2006: 780).
Relationships lie at the roots of resilience: when everyday relationships
reflect ongoing abuse, rancor, and insecurity, this profoundly threatens
resilience as well as the personal attributes that might otherwise have
fostered it. Conversely, the present of support, love, and security fosters
resilience in part, by reinforcing peoples innate strengths (such as self-
efficacy, positive emotions and emotion regulation) with these personally
attributes measured biologically and/or behaviourally.
(Luthar and Brown, 2007: 947)
Neuroscientists discovery of the social brain reveals that we are wired to connect
(Goleman, 2007: 4). This revelation provides a biological basis for understanding the
nature and confirming the importance of good quality relationships in maintaining a
sense of positive identity, well being and effectiveness in our daily work and lives:
Surely much of what makes life worth living comes down to our feelings of
well-being our happiness and sense of fulfilment. And good quality
relationships are one of the strongest sources of such feelings. In a
sense, resonant relationships are like emotional vitamins, sustaining us
through tough times and nourishing us daily.
(Goleman, 2007: 312)
We use the term relational resilience in order to acknowledge and emphasise that
teachers capacity to perform effectively in the face of adversity can be sustained and
supported through individual professional relationships, groups and networks in their
workplaces. Relational resilience resonates with the central thesis of social capital, that,
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
17/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
17
relationships matter (Field, 2008: 1). Goodwin (2005), from a psychological
perspective, also, maintains that close relationships act as important social glue,
helping people deal with the uncertainties of their changing world (2005: 615, cited in
Edwards, 2007: 8). Trusting and open networks may function as a valuable asset, or
capital, which enable them to build a sense of belonging in the school community, but
also provide intellectual, spiritual and emotional resources for teachers professional
development.
Moreover, Bryk and Schneider (2002) argue that teachers interpersonal worlds are
organised around distinct sets of role relationships: teachers with students, teachers
with other teachers, teachers with parents and with their school principal (2002: 20). A
trusting relationship between teachers in particular, was found to be of vital importance
in building teachers collective sense of resilience and contribute to strong associations
between positive relationships, trust and pupil attainment in elementary schools.
Schaufeli and Bakker (2004), also, found the obverse, that a lack of social support from
colleagues could lead to teachers emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation. For
Katherine, team spirit which encouraged peer support and sharing of good practice was
an important contributing influence on her positive professional outlook, particularly
when pressures at work combined with personal circumstances began to pose a serious
threat to her capacity to maintain her effectiveness in the classroom and her
department.
In contrast to teachers individual resilient qualities, relational resilience is developed
through the many and varied interactions which characterise their work. The presence,
quality and range of opportunities which promote relationships of trust and shared
values and visions amongst the staff can foster the strength of a collective capacity for
joint work. The importance of building collective strength and confidence in communities
of teachers in the reality of teaching is that they are able to interact knowledgeably and
assertively with the bearers of innovation and reform (Hargreaves, 1994: 195). For
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
18/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
18
teachers working in schools in socio-economically challenging circumstances in
particular, staff collegiality and mutual trust and support are of profound importance in
sustaining their morale, sense of efficacy, well-being and effectiveness (AUTHORS, 2007;
also Peterson, et al., 2008). As Katherines case shows, positive relational bonds in such
circumstances help create an optimal condition for building collective efficacy beliefs
amongst teachers. Goddard et al. (2004) argue that such robust sense of group
capabilityestablishes expectations (cultural norms) for success which encourage
organisational members to work resiliently toward desired ends (2004: 8). In
education, these desired ends have to be related to students progress and achievement.
Organisational resilience: leadership matters
In contrast to the nature of individual and relational resilience, organisational resilience
places an importance on the effectiveness of the organisational context, structure and
system, on how the system functions as a whole to create a supportive environment for
individuals professional learning and development; build a trusting relationship amongst
its staff; foster a collective sense of efficacy and resilience and, through this, manage to
sustain its continuous improvement. The concept of organisational resilience has been
developed largely outside education. Hamel and Vlikangas (2003), writing in the
context of business, define organisational resilience as the ability to reinvent strategies
dynamically in response to changes in circumstances. They describe a truly resilient
organisation as a workplace that is filled with excitement and argue that strategic
renewal, i.e. creative reconstruction, must be the natural consequence of an
organisations innate resilience (2003: 2-3).
Horne and Orr (1998) proposed seven Cs to describe key features of resilient
organisations: community, competence, connections, commitment, communication,
coordination and consideration. These characteristics are also used in the educational
research literature to portray schools which are learning communities in which both
pupils and teachers are likely to experience enriched relationships with others, enhanced
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
19/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
19
efficacy and commitment and increased job fulfilment (Stoll and Louis, 2007). At a time
when the contemporary landscape of teaching is littered with successive and persisting
government policy reforms that have increased teachers external accountabilities, work
complexity and emotional workload, as the portrait of Katherine shows, such learning
communities are those which implicitly illustrate organisational resilience a necessary
condition for schools and their teachers to sustain their identities and continue to work
for improvement. In the case of Katherine, the organisational structure in her school
which clearly defined patterns of roles and responsibilities and which encouraged flows of
information and communication played a critical part in helping her survive and succeed
in her school and in the profession. In addition, strong leadership support provided her
with strength, confidence and a sense of belonging which enabled her to recover from
short-term setbacks and continue to make a difference to the learning and achievement
of the pupils.
Yes, supportive organisational communities do not happy by chance. They require good
leadership. Knoop (2007) argues that Considering the present pace of sociocultural
change, it is difficult to imagine a time in history when good leadership was more
important than it is today, and when the lack of it was more dangerous (2007: 223).
Thus:
Leaders are the stewards of organisational energy [Resilience]they
inspire or demoralise others, first by how effectively they manage their
own energy and next by how well they manage, focus, invest and renew
the collective energy [Resilience] of those they lead.
(Loehr and Schwartz, 2003: 5)
Similarly, Henry and Milstein (2006) found that,
Teachers, students, parents, support personnel are the fabric of the school.
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
20/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
20
Leaders are weavers of the fabric of resiliency initiatives.
(Henry and Milstein, 2006: 8)
Examples of such leadership may be found reported in international longitudinal, multi-
perspective research on successful school principals and their staff (Day and Leithwood,
2007). In North America, Corrie Giles (2006) reports on research on the resilience of two
urban secondary schools in New York State and Ontario, Canada, which had
experienced, successive waves of increasingly standardised reform, yet which were
characterised, like the English school, by an enduring internal architecture of personal,
group and organisational characteristics as well as external contextual conditions that
provide long term nurturing and support (Giles, April 2007, unpublished: 29). In these
North American schools, the internal conditions and the ability of the principals to buffer
the effects of external changes had created conditions for self-renewal. Committed and
trustworthy leaders at all levels are at the heart of organisational resilience.
The qualities of school principals and the contextually sensitive strategies which they
enact over time (Leithwood and Day, 2007) are key to building and retaining the
commitment, engagement and collective loyalty of teachers. Examples of such
contextually sensitive leadership may also be found in a mixed-methods national study
of the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes which is, to date, the largest and
most extensive study of contemporary school leadership to be conducted in England
(Authors et al., 2009). Principals professional values and leadership practices were
shown to have had a profound influence upon the development of individual, relational
and organisational capacity and trust in a group of effective and improved primary and
secondary schools, which led to the growth of confidence and self-efficacy in the staff
and achievement of the students (Authors et al., 2009). Interactions, structures and
strategies which secured consistency with values and vision in the school were identified
as fundamental to establishing and sustaining relationships within the school community
a key contributory factor in teachers sense of individual, relational and organisational
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
21/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
21
resilience.
Conclusions: Sustaining Resilience, Commitment and Effectiveness in Times of
Change
It is clear, then, that resilience is a multi-faceted and dynamic construct (see also
Oswald et al., 2003). It encompasses the competence to function well generally over
time despite the experience of initial, brief spikes and to recover effectively from severe
disruptions in functioning (Luthar and Brown, 2007: 941). It is not a static state and is
closely related to the quality of relationships in the environments in which individuals
work and live. The nature and sustainability of resilience in teachers over the course of
their professional lives will be determined by their management of the interaction
between the strength of their vocational selves, those whom they meet as part of their
daily work and the collective sense of resilience within the organisational system.
Teachers capacities to manage unanticipated as well as anticipated events effectively
will be mediated by these. It is essential, then, to the health of the organisation and all
those within it that its importance to quality (of teaching, for example) is acknowledged
and nurtured.
Our portrait of Katherine suggests that for teachers, resilience is necessary on a daily
basis to: i) meet the often unpredictable challenges posed by students who may not
always be highly motivated to learn, and whose problems outside the school are likely to
form part of their behaviour in school; ii) manage the tensions inherent in meeting
externally identified narrowly defined sets of academic standards whilst simultaneously
caring for the personal and citizenship needs of students; iii) respond to changes in the
curriculum; iv) maintain the physical, psychological and emotional energy needed to
engage others in learning for sustained periods of time; and v) collaborate with
colleagues in planning and evaluating in order to improve. In the case of Katherine and
many teachers in the VITAE project, leadership of her school principal, supportive school
culture, staff collegiality and positive teacher-pupil relationships were found to be
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
22/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
22
contributing influences on their ability to gather intellectual and emotional strengths in
the face of setbacks and challenges (e.g. work life tensions and external school
inspection), and through these, sustain their sense of efficacy, commitment and
perceived effectiveness in the profession and continue to fulfil their passion for teaching.
People need one another and, above all, they need encouragement, but
that encouragement is best when it is personal, taking account of their
unique history and hopes, coming from somebody who inspires trust.
(Zeldin, 2004: 36-38 op cit)
It is the complexities and subtleties of the emotions that many teachers endure in their
every ordinary school day including, in schools in England, teaching increasing
numbers of those who have behavioural problems, those who find it difficult to engage in
learning and those who are emotionally anxious and troubled because of unhappy family
relationships at home that makes what they do unique. It is the ongoing demands on
their intellectual energy, competence and capacity to connect self and subject and
students in the fabric of life (Palmer, 1998: 11) that distinguishes their teaching selves
from the selves of other professionals. At a time when organisational and professional
change is inevitable in order to meet new local and national social and economic
challenges, it is those who manage to connect their educational values, beliefs and
deepest callings with those of their colleagues and organisations who are most likely to
overcome setbacks in different work settings and enjoy the happiness, joy and fulfilment
derived from the differences that they make to the lives of their pupils and through
them, the wellbeing of tomorrows society. Thus, the central task for all concerned with
enhancing quality and standards in schools is not only to have a better understanding of
what influences teachersmotivation, commitment and their capacity to teach well over
the course of a career, but also the means by which the resilience necessary for these to
be sustained may be nurtured and developed.
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
23/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
23
References
Bandura, A. (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44,
1175-1184.
Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2000) Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organisational effectiveness.
In Locke, E. A. (Ed.) Handbook of Principles of Organisation Behaviour. Oxford:
Blackwell.
Benard, B. (1995) Fostering Resilience in Children. ERIC/EECE Digest, EDO-PS-99.
Bryk, A. S. and Schneider, B. L. (2002) Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for
Improvement.
Cicchetti, D. (1993). Developmental psychopathology: Reactions, reflections,
projections. Developmental Review, 13, 471502.
Cicchetti, D. and Garmezy, N. (Eds.). (1993). Milestones in the development of resilience
[Special issue] Development and Psychopathology, 5 (4), 497774.
Cicchetti, D., & Valentino, K. (2006). An ecologicaltransactional perspective on child
maltreatment: Failure of the average expectable environment and its influence on child
development. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol.
3. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (2nd ed., pp. 129201). New York: Wiley.
Cowen, E. L., Work, W. C., & Wyman, P. A. (1997). In S. S. Luthar, J. A. Burack, D.
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
24/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
24
Cicchetti, & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on
adjustment, risk, and disorder(pp. 527547). New York: Cambridge.
Curtis, W. J., & Cicchetti, D. (2003). Moving research on resilience into the 21st century:
Theoretical and methodological considerations in examining the biological contributors to
resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 773810.
AUTHORS (2006)
AUTHORS (2007)
AUTHORS et al. (2009)
AUTHORS (2010)
Day, C. and Kington, A. (2008) Identity, well-being and effectiveness: the emotional
contexts of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, Vol. 16, No. 1: 7:23.
Day C. and Leithwood K. (Eds)(2007) Successful Principal Leadership in Times of
Change: an international perspective.Dordrecht: Springer
Denzin, N. (1984) On Understanding Emotion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dinham, S. and Scott, C. (2000) Moving into the third, outer domain of teacher
satisfaction.Journal of Educational Administration, 38 (4): 379-396.
Dorman, J. P. (2003) Relationship between school and classroom environment and
teacher burnout: A LISREL analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 6: 107-127.
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
25/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
25
Edwards, A. (2007) Relational agency in professional practice: A CHAT analysis.Actio:
An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1: 1-17.
Egeland, B., Carlson, E., & Sroufe, L. A. (1993). Resilience as process. Development and
Psychopathology, 5, 517528.
Field, J. (2008) Social Capital. London and New York: Routledge.
Giles, C. (2006) Sustaining Secondary School Visions Over Time: Resistance, Resilience
and Educational Reform.Journal of Educational Change (2006), 7: 179-208.
Goddard, R., Hoy, W. and Hoy A. (2004) Collective efficacy beliefs: theoretical
developments, empirical evidence, and future direction. Educational Researcher, 33 (3):
3-13.
Goleman, D. (1996) Emotional Intelligence. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Goleman, D. (2007) Social Intelligence. New York: Arrow Books.
Goodwin, R. (2005) Why I Study Relationships and Culture. The Psychologist, 18 (10):
614-615.
Gordon, K. A., Longo, M. and Trickett, M. (2000) Fostering resilience in children. The
Ohio State University Bulletin 875-99:http://ohioline.osu.edu/b875.
Gore, S. and Eckenrode, J. (1994) Context and process in research on risk and
resilience. In Haggerty, R., Sherrod, L. R., Garmezy, N, and Rutter, M. (Eds.) Stress,
Risk and Resilience in Children and Adolescents: Process, Mechanisms and Interventions,
pp.19-63. New York: Cambridge University Press.
http://ohioline.osu.edu/b875http://ohioline.osu.edu/b875http://ohioline.osu.edu/b875http://ohioline.osu.edu/b875 -
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
26/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
26
Gorman, C. (2005, January 17) The importance of resilience. Time, 165 (3): A52-A55.
Greenberg, M. (2006). Promoting resilience in children and youth: Preventive
interventions and their interface with neuroscience.Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences, 1094, 139150.
Guardian (2003) Workload Hits Teacher Morale. (Report on General Teaching
Council/Guardian/Mori Teacher Survey). 7th January 2008.
AUTHORS (2007)
Hamel, G. and Vlikangas, L. (2003) The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review,
September: 1-13.
Hansen, D. T. (1995) The Call to Teach. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, A. (1994) Changing Teachers, Changing Times. London: Cassell. New York:
Teachers College Press.
Henderson, N., & Milstein, M. (2003) Resiliency in schools: Making it happen for students
and educators. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Henry, D. A. & Milstein, M. (2006) Building leadership capacity through resiliency. Paper
presented at the Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration and
Management, Lefcosia, Cyprus.
Higgins, G. O. (1994) Resilient Adults: Overcoming a Cruel Past. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
27/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
27
Horne, J. and Orr, J.E. (1998) Assessing behaviors that create resilient organizations.
Employment Relations Today, 24 (4) 29-39.
Howard, S., Dryden, J. and Johnson, B. (1999) Childhood resilience: review and
critique of literature. Oxford Review of Education, 25 (3): 307-323.
Hoy, A. W. and Spero, R. B. (2005) Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years
of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21: 343-
356.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003) Who Controls Teachers Work?Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Teacher vulnerability: understanding its moral and political
roots. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26 (3): 307-323.
Knoop, H. H. (2007) Control and responsibility. In H. Gardener (ed.) Responsibility at
Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Leithwood, K. and Beatty (2008) Leading with Teacher Emotions in Mind. Corwin Press
Leithwood, K. & Day, C. (2007) What we learned: A broad view, in K. Leithwood & C.
Day (Eds) Successful School Leadership in Times of Change (Toronto: Springer), pp.
189-203.
Loehr, J. and Schwartz, T. (2003) The Power of Full Engagement. New York: Free Press.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B., & Norman, S.M. (2007) Positive psychological
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
28/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
28
capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel
Psychology, 60: 541-572.
Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five
decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk,
disorder, and adaptation (2nd ed., pp. 739795). New York: Wiley.
Luthar, S. and Brown, P. (2007) Maximizing resilience throughdiverse levels of inquiry:
Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future. Development and
Psychopathology, 19: 931-955.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical
evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543562.
Mackenzie, N.M. (2004) Teaching excellence awards: An apple for the teacher? A thesis
submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education,
LaTrobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mackenzie, N. M. (2007) Teacher morale: more complex than we think? The Australian
Educational Researcher, 34 (1): 89-104.
Margolis, J. (2008) What will keep todays teachers teaching? Looking for a hook as a
new career cycle emerges. Teachers College Record, 110 (1): 160-194.
Maslach, C., Shaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001) Job burnout.Annual Review of
Psychology, 52, 397-422.
Masten, A. S. (2001) Ordinary magic: resilience process in development.American
Psychologist, 56: 227-239.
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
29/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
29
Masten, A. S., Hubbard, J. J., Gest, S. D., Tellegen, A., Garmezy, N., & Ramirez, M.
(1999). Adaptation in the context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and maladaptation
from childhood to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 143169.
Masten, A., & Garmezy, N. (1985) Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in
developmental psychopathology. In B. Lahey & A. Kazdin (Eds.),Advances in clinical
child psychology(Vol. 8, pp. 152). New York: Plenum Press.
Nash, P. (2005) Speech to Worklife Support Conference. London Well Being
Conference, London, 21st April 2005.
National Union of Teachers (2007) Crazy about Work. Retrieved on 19th February 2007
fromhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/eastmidlands/series11/docs/work.pdf
Nieto, S. (2003) What Keeps Teachers Going? New York: Teachers College Press.
Noddings, N. (1992) The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to
Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Oswald, M., Johnson, B. and Howard, S. (2003) Quantifying and evaluating resilience-
promoting factors teachers beliefs and perceived roles. Research in Education, 70:
50-64.
Palmer, P. J. (1998) The Courage to Teach: Exploring the Inner Landscape of A
Teachers Life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peterson, C., Park, N. and Sweeney, P. (2008) Group well-being: morale from a positive
http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/eastmidlands/series11/docs/work.pdfhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/eastmidlands/series11/docs/work.pdfhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/eastmidlands/series11/docs/work.pdfhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/eastmidlands/series11/docs/work.pdf -
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
30/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
30
psychology perspective.Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57: 19-36.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2001) Teacher Workload Study. London: DfES
Rutter, M. (1990). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In J. Rolf, A. S.
Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. H. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective
factors in the development of psychopathology(pp. 181214). New York: Cambridge.
Rutter, M. (2006) Genes and behavior: Naturenurture interplay explained. Malden, MA:
Blackwell.
Schaufeli, W. B. and Bakker, A. D. B. (2004) Job demands, job resources, and their
relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study.Journal of
Organisational Behaviour, 25: 293-315.
Stoll L. and Louis K. S. (Eds) (2007) Professional Learning Communities: Divergence,
Depths and Dilemmas. Maidenhead: Open university Press
Waller, M. (2001) Resilience in ecosystemic context: Evolution of the concept.American
Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 7(3): 290-297.
Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Hmlinen, S., Sarja, A., Kimonen, E. and Nevalainen, R.
(2004) Pressures, rewards and teacher retention: a comparative study of primary
teaching in England and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48 (2):
169-188.
Werner, E. E. (1984). Resilient children. Young Children, 1, 6872.
Zeldin, T. (2004) Richer not happier: a 21stcentury search for the good life. In Grayling,
-
8/6/2019 Emotional Journeys
31/31
Paper submitted to Teaching and Teacher Education. Please do NOT quote without the authors
permission.
A. C., Mulgan, G., Zeldin, T. and Reeves, R. London: RSA Journal, July 2004: 36-39.
Zucker, R. A. (2006a). Alcohol use and the alcohol use disorders: A developmental
biopsychosocial systems 954 S. S. Luthar and P. J. Brown formulation covering the life
course. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology:
Vol. 3. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (2nd ed., pp. 620656). New York: Wiley.