ForewordThe 8th edition of the Barometer of the association ofEuropean Metropolitan Transport Authorities (EMTA)lies before you, comprising data of 26 of Europe’smetropolitan regions and by Montreal (Canada).Barometer figures show the key characteristics of thetransport networks by delivering cross-over views,intertwining economic indicators from stakeholderswith mobility outcome, earning capacity (GDP) withcar ownership and ticket fares.

From this a perspective emerges on local strategiesfor mobility needs, supply and demand and thepotential for sustainable development for cycling,walking and public transport.

The Barometer reflects how organizing authoritiesperform and how their economic and socialdevelopment was affected by prices, running costsand investments in the transport system.

The Barometer also displays the extent up to whatlevel the public transport sector has been impactedby the economic recession. Indicators reflect urbantransport policies achievements and can be input forscenario thinking.

Without prejudice to the variety of specific contextsa comparison between urban areas facing similarchallenges provides a source of information fordecision makers to benchmark their strategies.

Metropolitan Transport authorities are usually wellequipped to find alternative ways for recovery, byinvesting in an integrated and innovative mobilityplanning. Gathering data on mobility patterns canprove instrumental to their knowledge and triggermore efficiency and sustainability of urban transportnetworks.

Improved data compilation requires orientation on tonew sources and a methodical review of collection.EMTA will therefore continue to collect Barometerdata albeit in a more concise scope. The aim is tobenefit from new digital sources to tap into urbanmobility data sources.

Opportunities for collaboration with peer stake -holders to expand the scope and quality of urbantransport data collection are welcomed, providedthey bring added value.

Changes over the previous edition (2011) show:> Populations tend to densify in the metropolitan

areas, at the same time several transport authoritiesenlarge their territorial scope (metropolitan areasof Hamburg, Helsinki, Prague and Seville);

> the modal share in favour of public transport is stillhigh in the main cities (30%), and soft modes suchas walking and cycling show a tendency toincrease (41%), shifting from private car (32%) andpublic transport;

> the demand for public transport is above one trip perinhabitant every working day, although in severalmetropolitan areas a decrease has been noticed dueto the economic crisis;

> Resources from fare revenues in 2012 amount onaverage to 48.2 % of the operational costs acrossthe metropolitan areas surveyed whereas the publicsubsidies amount to 45.6 %. This shows an increaseof fare revenues and other revenues (renting, adver -tising, etc.) compared to 2011.

The Barometer is produced by CRTM Madrid.

This EMTA Barometer 2012 leaflet has been published in December 2013. It is also downloadable available fromwww.emta.com in the publication section.

EMTA BAROMETER OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN THE EUROPEAN METROPOLITAN AREAS

data

20

12

20122012

Gathering performancedata on mobility andon passenger demand

will remaininstrumental to

transport authoritiescore businesses

> European metropolitan areas keep growing but have various demographic structuresMost urban areas surveyed have seen an increase of their population over the past ten years 2002-2012. Theaverage growth rate is around 8% for the cities that have provided data. Some metropolitan areas have seen itspopulation increase due to the extension of their PTA area (Hamburg, Helsinki, Prague and Seville). Others have anet increase in population over 13% like Madrid, Oslo and Stockholm. Only Vilnius has a decrease in population (-4.5%) over the last 10 year period, together with Berlin-Branderburg (-2.5%) and Budapest (-0.7%).

The weight of the main city within the whole metropolitan area is roughly a 43% of total population with largedifferences illustrating the diverse administrative frameworks and histories of the cities.

> Car ownership rates are twice as high in some cities as in others (750 cars per 1,000 inhabitants in Prague vs310 in Amsterdam and 326 in London and Copenhagen). Different groups can be observed and it seems thatseveral wealthy metropolitan areas have a relatively low car ownership ratio (under 450 cars/1,000 inhabitants),and lower use of private car. In other words, public transport authorities have growing responsibilities in themetropolitan areas to offer attractive public transport services to a less car dependant community.

-5.0% -3.0% -1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 7.0% 9.0% 11.0% 13.0% 15.0% 17.0% 19.0% 21.0% 23.0% 25.0%

Stadsregio Amsterdam Barcelona Metropolitan Region

Berlin-Brandenburg Bilbao

West Midlands (Birmingham) Brussels Metropolitan

Central Hungarian Region (Budapest)(8) Cadiz Bay

Greater Copenhagen Frankfurt Rhein-Main

Hamburg (9) Helsinki(9)

Greater London Lyon Urban Community

Madrid Community Greater Montreal

Oslo Region Paris Ile-de-France

Middle Bohemia Region (Prague)(9) Metropolitan Region RDH

Metropolitan Area of Seville(9) South Yorkshire (Sheffield)

County of Stockholm Stuttgart Region

Turin Metropolitan Area VOR Region (Vienna)

Vilnius Warsaw

9.4% 12.7%

-2.5% 2.7%

7.2% 8.8%

-0.7% 8.1%

5.3%

5.3% 4.0%

-2.1% 1.5%

4.6% 5.1%

1.8% 2.4%

5.7% 18.0%

10.9%

11.1% 8.7%

13.6% 10.6%

16.9%

3.5% 5.3%

2.0% 6.4%

5.5% 7.6%

3.6% 6.3%

8.4% 6.5%

13.8% 2.0%

6.5% 14.9%

3.3% 2.6%

12.5%

-4.5%

24.3%

2.7% 7.2%

4.8% 17.4%

4.0% 9.1%

1.8% -2.0%

6.3% 2.6%

9.6%

data

2012

2002 - 2012 evolution

2007 - 2012 evolution

8th edition presentation> 28 areas are listed in this leaflet, which means a record in participation since the first issue of this publication (25 cities in 2011),

Description of the PTA(1) areas surveyed Authority Population PTA PTA area Urbanised Density Annual GDP Population main city responsible 2012 (inhabitants) surface (km2) surface (km2) (inhabitants/km2) per capita (€) 2012 (inhabitants)Stadsregio Amsterdam Stadsregio 1,437,720 1,003 517 1,433 31,360 790,044Barcelona Metropolitan Region ATM 5,052,000 3,239 597 1,560 26,460 1,621,000Berlin-Brandenburg VBB 5,824,733 30,376 3,343 192 27,705 3,375,222Bilbao CTB 1,153,351 2,217 241 520 28,859 350,558West Midlands (Birmingham) Centro 2,762,700 899 634 3,073 29,279(3) 1,085,400Brussels Metropolitan MRBC 3,270,178 4,300 1,200 761 41,000(4) 1,138,854Central Hungarian Region (Budapest)(2) BKK 1,727,495 525 358 3,290 21,821 1,727,495Cadiz Bay CMTBC 783,847 3,072 80 255 na 123,948Greater Copenhagen Movia 2,507,620 9,176 1,979 273 45,479 661,469Frankfurt Rhein-Main RMV 5,000,000 14,000 na 357 34,291(5) 687,775Hamburg HVV 3,426,000 8,616 747 398 50,300 1,813,000Helsinki HSL 1,165,811 1,507 na 774 54,966 603,968Greater London TfL 8,200,000 1,572 1,042 5,216 43,949 8,200,000Lyon Urban Community SYTRAL 1,300,000 613 360 2,121 42,830 490,000Madrid Community CRTM 6,498,560 8,026 1,037 810 30,345 3,233,527Greater Montreal AMT 3,918,340 3,980 na 985 34,760 1,981,672Oslo Region Ruter 1,169,539 5,005 417 234 69,512 623,966Paris Ile-de-France STIF 11,914,812 12,012 2,534 992 51,118 2,256,239Middle Bohemia Region (Prague) ROPID 1,891,698 5,880 296 322 24,809 1,268,796

Metropolitan Area Rotterdam-Den Haag MRDH (Rotterdam) 2,200,000 990 440 2,222 36,500 616,528 MRDH (Den Haag) 502,802Metropolitan Area of Seville CTAS 1,468,009 4,221 337 348 17,587(6) 703,021South Yorkshire (Sheffield) SYPTE 1,352,144 1,552 326 871 20,953(7) 557,382County of Stockholm SL 2,127,006 6,526 na 326 56,615 881,235Stuttgart Region VRS 2,455,759 3,012 718 815 39,721 618,431Turin Metropolitan Area AMMT 1,515,786 837 246 1,811 21,056(6) 872,091VOR Region (Vienna) VOR 2,533,889 6,457 415 392 44,300(5) 1,757,353Vilnius MESP 806,111 9,731 449 83 10,884 533,279Warsaw ZTM 2,466,202 2,510 na 983 25,000 1,715,517

(1) PTA: Public Transport Authority. (2) PTA area is main city. (3) GDP for whole UK. (4) GDP estimation. (5) GDP for main city.(6) GDP province data. (7) GVA instead GDP.

Evolution of Population: decade 2002-2012 compared to 5 years span 2007-2012

(8) PTA area has decreased in surface, thus in population. (9) Extension of PTA area.

0

10,0

00

20,0

00

30,0

00

40,0

00

50,0

00

60,0

00

70,0

00

Helsinki

County of Stockholm

Paris Ile-de-France

Oslo Region

Madrid Community

Greater Montreal

Middle Bohemian Region (Prague)(10)

Metropolitan Area of Seville

Stuttgart Region

Turin Metropolitan Area

Vilnius

Warsaw

Budapest

South Yorkshire (Sheffield)

Hamburg(11)

Brussels

Berlin-Brandenburg

Barcelona

VOR(11) Region (Vienna)

Frankfurt Rhein-Main(10)

Metropolitan Region RDH

West Midlands (Birmingham)

Bilbao Lyon Urban Community

Stadsregio Amsterdam

Greater Copenhagen

Greater London

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

Vilnius

aArea of SeMetropolit pA f S

800

750

700

650

600

550

500

450

400

h

GreaterG

Community syon Urbany

C iLBilbao

(Birmingham) est MidlandsW

DRegion RDHMetropolitani

(10)RRhein-MainrankfurtFF

(Vienna)

a

Regiong(Vi

(11)RVO

Barcelona

-BrandenburgeBerlin

sBrussels

Hambu

horkshireYh

YoSouth

arsaw

p

W

Vilnius

Metropolitan Areaurin

o

Tu

Stuttgart Region

eville

P

itan ill

(10)Region (Prague)Middle Bohemian

Greater Montreal e

Madrid Communityu

aris Ile-de-FP

(11)

F

urgHelsinki

Oslo Region

rance Ile-de-F

Countyy

Hg

k

10,0

00 0

350

300

London

50,0

00

40,0

00

30,0

00

20,0

00

nGreatere

Copenhagennp gGAmsterdamt

Stadsregiod gA d

Brandenburge(Sheffield) fiorkshirehY

s

Yo

Budapest

of Stockholm

70,0

00

60,0

00

cCounty yyy

f S k

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

West Midlands (Birmingham)

Greater Montreal South Yorkshire (Sheffield)

VOR Region (Vienna)

Turin Metropolitan Area Brussels

Cadiz Bay Lyon Urban Community

Madrid Community

Oslo Region

Frankfurt Rhein-Main(10-12)

Metropolitan Area of Seville

Prague (10-11)

Hamburg

County of Stockholm

Stuttgart Region

Vilnius(11) Warsaw Stadsregio Amsterdam

Barcelona

Berlin-Brandenburg

Budapest

Greater Conpenhagen

Helsinki

Greater London Bilbao

Metropolitan Region RDH(11)

Paris Ile-de-France

70%

Greater Lon

(Birmi

e

60%

50%

40%

ConpenhagenpGreatert

Budapest d

Berlin-Brandenburg

Stadsregio Amst

orkshirhSouth YYo

(Birmiest Midlands W

rance Helsinki

e

1)

A

aris Ile-de-FPP

(11)nMetropolitan

1

Region RDH(1p

ndon o

Helsinki

andenburgConpenhagen

(11)

Brandenburg

terdam e arsawaW1(11)Vilnius

St tt tR

Area of

RegionStuttgart S

County of Stockholm

( 0 )

County of Stockholm

Hamburg r

Area of SevilleoMetropolitanoA

pA f S ill

(10-12)a

y

Rhein-MainRhein-Mainrankfurt

C it

F

ROslo Region

Community mMadridd

CommunityCommunityon Urban

ngham)

nyC iLLLy

Cadiz BayCBrussels e AreaA

Metropolitan Metropoliturin TT

OR Region (Vienna)R Region (VVd(Sheffield) ree

Greater Montreal Greater Mo

ngham)gMidlands

(10-11)uPrague

350

Barcelona

300

30%

650

Bilbao

600

550

500

450

400

onan

800

750

700

Other factors like urban density, family size, existence of efficient public transport sys-tems, or the cost of using and parking of cars can lead to lower car ownership rates.

> Public transport accounts for more than 28% of all trips (46% considering onlymotorised trips) in the densest parts of most European metropolitan areas (in the maincities), illustrating its fundamental economic, social and environmental role in large urban territories. Soft modes(walking and cycling) account for 41% and the motorised modes (mainly private car) for 32%. Compared to 2011,figures show that a light shift from private car and public transport has occurred in favour of soft modes.

Most of the main cities achieve more than 60% of modal share for what we can consider as “sustainable mobility”(as sum of public transport and soft modes). Amsterdam, Barcelona, Bilbao, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris, Stockholm,Vienna and Warsaw stand out with a rate over 70%, illustrating the very dense public transport systems irrigating theheart of those capital cities, and the deep-rooted habit of walking and/or biking in the European cities.

The metropolitan areas of these cities mentioned above together with Budapest, Greater London, Berlin-Brandenburg, Lyon, Oslo and Helsinki have a clear predominance of sustainable modes over the private car.Greater London and Budapest are the metropolitan areas among those surveyed, where public transport accountsfor the highest modal shares of all trips (between 40% and 50%).

There is a gap between modal share in the main city and modal share in the whole metropolitan area wherepublic transport accounts, in average, for 20% of all trips. This figure rather stable as monitored over the pastyears, embodies one of the main challenges facing public transport authorities and operating companies in thecoming years: developing public transport in the suburbs and the less dense parts of the metropolitan areas.

Modal share of tripsIn whole PTA area In main city

Soft modes (cycling, walking) Public transport Rest of motorised modes

66.0% 57.4%

39.0% 62.3%

40.0%

52.7% 42.0% 43.0%

40.0% 35.6%

43.0% 33.6%

18.0% 33.0%

55.4% 24.0%

53.0% 47.0%

40.8%

44.8% 31.7% 33.4% 34.0% 36.1%

21.9%

11.0% 29.3%

21.0% 26.8%

59.9% 26.5%

30.0% 23.0%

18.0% 33.8%

21.0% 40.1%

26.5% 30.0%

31.8% 43.0%

12.6% 13.0%

19.3%

30.3% 24.2%

25.1% 39.0%

24.6% 54.6%

23.0% 13.3%

40.0% 10.9%

40.1% 33.5%

28.0% 34.0%

42.0% 30.6%

36.0% 26.3%

55.6% 37.0%

12.8% 33.0% 33.6%

40.0% 39.9%

24.8% 44.1% 41.6%

27.0% 39.3%

23.5% 32.5% 30.2% 37.3%

48.5%

35.7% 22.3%

29.3% 30.4%

27.6% 26.0%

7.0%

10.4% 9.0%

22.5% 12.5%

19.2% 9.0%

44.5%

53.9% 68.7%

48.2% 57.1% 53.2%

65.0%

12.6% 27.0%

40.3%

17.0% 23.0%

20.2%

70.4% 50.0%

39.5%

34.0% 34.0% 33.8%

22.6% 35.0%

31.2%

20.0%

12.0% 26.1%

43.3% 16.0%

31.6%

54.0% 40.1%

34.1% 49.0%

37.2%

36.6% 31.0%

9.0%

50.7% 9.8%

8.0%

53.6% 49.0%

58.0%

56.0% 50.5%

39.0% 48.3%

30.5% 10.3%

18.6% 16.0%

20.2% 36.2%

15.0%

35.0% 30.9%

45.0% 31.5%

63.8% 54.5%

39.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

West Midlands (Birmingham)

Greater Copenhagen

Stadsregio Amsterdam

Barcelona Metropolitan Region

Berlin-Brandenburg

Bilbao

Brussels Metropolitan

Central Hungarian Region (Budapest)

Cadiz Bay

Frankfurt Rhein-Main

Hamburg

Helsinki

Greater London

Lyon Urban Community

Madrid Community

Greater Montreal

Oslo Region

Paris Ile-de-France

Middle Bohemia Region (Prague)

Metropolitan Region RDH

RotterdamDen Haag

Metropolitan Area of Seville

South Yorkshire (Sheffield)

County of Stockholm

Stuttgart Region

Turin Metropolitan Area

VOR Region (Vienna)

Vilnius

Warsaw

Car ownership rate versus annual GDP per capita

Modal share of private car versus car ownership rate

Annual GDP per inhabitant in PTA area (€/year) Car ownership in PTA area (cars/1,000 inhabitants)

Car

owne

rshi

p ra

te in

PTA

are

a(c

ars/

1,00

0 in

habi

tant

s)

Mod

al s

hare

of p

rivat

e ca

r in

PTA

are

a (%

)

data

2012

(10) Car ownership figure for main city (11) GDP and modal share figures for main city (12) Figures for modal share correspond to whole Germany

> Regarding the public transport demand, each inhabitant does more than 246 jour-neys (vs 244 in 2011) per year on public transport, more than one trip every workingday. In some cases the total demand is over 400 journeys as in Budapest, GreaterLondon and Warsaw. In half of the metropolitan areas, the share of the bus mode isstill dominant.

Over the years the increase in public transport demand reflects the effort being made by authorities andoperators to offer a high quality public transport system, with accessible vehicles and stations, using ITS(Intelligent Transport System) technologies to guarantee reliability and safety in the operation, and real timeinformation and contactless tickets to the user to promote the public transport use and make it more competitivecompared to the private vehicle.

Public transport demand per inhabitant (Journeys in PT per mode and inhabitant in 2012)

> Fare policies and fare levels differ a lot between the different metropolitan areas. The price of a single ticket validfor the main city varies from €0.64 up to €4.19. The monthly pass varies from €22.06 to €138.12. However,these figures make no difference with the size and economic features of the metropolitan areas.

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham Brussels

Budapest Cadiz

Copenhagen Frankfurt Hamburg Helsinki

Greater London Lyon

Madrid Montreal

Oslo Paris

Prague RotterdamDen Haag

Seville Sheffield

Stockholm Stuttgart

Turin Vienna Vilnius

Warsaw

1.74 2.00

2.40 1.20

2.47 2.00

1.20 1.15

3.22 2.60

1.40 2.70

2.47 1.60

1.50 2.28

4.09 1.70

0.96 1.93

2.00 1.25 1.23

4.19 2.10

1.50 2.10

0.64 0.88

44.70 50.95

77.00 32.90

104.82 52.00

36.06

45.02 81.00

44.00 58.90

138.12

55.00 52.20

57.45 84.50

56.50 25.11

76.20

85.41 92.03

56.90 38.00

47.00 28.96

22.06

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00

data

2012

Stadsregio Amsterdam Barcelona Metropolitan Region

Berlin-Brandenburg Bilbao

West Midlands (Birmingham) Brussels Metropolitan

Central Hungarian Region (Budapest) (14) Cadiz Bay (15)

Greater Copenhagen Frankfurt Rhein-Main

Hamburg Helsinki

Greater London Lyon Urban Community

Madrid Community Greater Montreal

Oslo Region Paris Ile-de-France

Middle Bohemia Region (Prague) Metropolitan Region RDH

Metropolitan Area of Seville South Yorkshire (Sheffield)

County of Stockholm Stuttgart Region (14)

Turin Metropolitan Area VOR Region (Vienna) (15)

Vilnius (13) Warsaw

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550

61 64

48 100

69

6 83

63 124

152 285

122 97

62 114 109

81 78

58 79

140

102 21

39 230

70

5 40 91

2

2 38

17

49 16

50 2

41 10 68

42

3 11

21

34

23 108

42 82

104 76

40

96 53

150 154

93 64

70 129

125 37 25

10

151

26 300

80

72 28

94 14

17 21

4 38

100

40 121

28 4

28 100

10

5 7

36

9 33

22

178

145 119

169

7 87

118 320

295

326 220

130 257

348 285

18280

97 348

338 170

354 62

440

245

330

572

453

Bus journeys per inhabitant (urban and suburban bus)

Tram/light rail journeys per inhabitant Metro journeys per inhabitant Suburban railway journeys per inhabitant

Total journeys per inhabitant and year 000

(13) Green figure refers only to urban bus, and yellow figure to trolleybuses(14) Figure includes all modes(15) Green figure refers to regional buses, and blue figure includes all urban modes (bus, tram and metro)

Single ticket price for the main city (€) Monthly pass price for main city (€)

The monthly pass fare in main city compared to GDP per capita (annual GDP in citydivided by 12) gives a ratio of 1.9 %. The cheapest monthly passes are in Helsinki,Copenhagen, Paris, Prague and Warsaw (1%) while the highest prices are in Sheffield(4.3 %), Birmingham (4.3%) and London (3.8%), all situated in the United Kingdom.

If we compare the single ticket with the petrol litre price (unleaded 95) we observe that lower ratio (0.4-0.9)should contribute to the use of public transport, while on the other hand higher ratios (over 1.5) indicate highlevel of welfare (Copenhagen, Frankfurt, Helsinki, Montreal, Oslo, Stockholm) or costly public transport systems.

Main city fare ratiosMonthly pass fare in main city / Single ticket fare in main city (€) /

Monthly GDP per capita in main city (%) petrol litre price (unleaded 95 in 2011, €)

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham (16) Brussels Budapest

Cadiz Copenhagen

Frankfurt Hamburg Helsinki

Greater London (16) Lyon Madrid

Montreal Oslo Paris

Prague RotterdamDen Haag

(16) Seville Sheffield

(16) Stockholm Stuttgart

(16) Turin Vienna

(16) Vilnius Warsaw

1.0 1.3

1.5 0.9

1.5 1.2

0.9 0.8

1.8 1.6

0.9 1.6

1.5 1.0 1.1

2.2 2.3

1.1 0.7

1.1 1.1

0.9 0.8

2.4 1.3

0.8 1.5

0.5 0.7

1.9% 1.9%

3.0% 1.3%

4.3% 1.5%

2.0%

0.9% 1.3%

1.4% 1.0%

3.8% 1.5%

1.6% 1.5%

0.9% 1.0%

1.1%

2.1%

4.3% 2.0%

1.1% 2.2%

1.3% 3.2%

1.0%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

51.1% 54.3%

46.4% 58.5% 23.3%

6.6% 2.8%

3.1% 51.9% 46.6% 29.1% 50.6% 32.2% 23.8% 56.0% 39.7% 47.1% 20.2% 74.4% 46.0% 54.4%

40.3% 36.3% 64.0%

1.0% 6.2%

19.1%

21.6%

9.7%

9.9%

43.3% 54.8%

59.5% 9.5%

56.7% 45.2%

48.9% 45.7%

46.9% 38.2%

73.3% 48.1%

53.4% 70.9%

49.4% 55.9%

32.3% 44.0%

47.4% 50.4%

39.6% 25.6%

52.0% 39.3%

41.0% 63.7%

36.0%

43.9% 31.0%

43.9%

40.4%

34.5%

% Public subsidies % Other revenues 10

.0%

0.0%

20.0

%

30.0

%

40.0

%

50.0

%

60.0

%

70.0

%

80.0

%

90.0

%

100.

0%

0.0%

10.0

%

20.0

%

30.0

%

40.0

%

50.0

%

60.0

%

70.0

%

80.0

%

90.0

%

100.

0%

Stadsregio Amsterdam Barcelona Metropolitan Region

Berlin-Brandenburg Bilbao

West Midlands (Birmingham) Brussels Metropolitan

Central Hungarian Region (Budapest) Cadiz Bay

Greater Copenhagen Frankfurt Rhein-Main

Hamburg Helsinki

Greater London (17) Lyon Urban Community

Madrid Community Greater Montreal

Oslo Region (17) Paris Ile-de-France

Middle Bohemia Region (Prague) Metropolitan Region RDH

Metropolitan Area of Seville South Yorkshire (Sheffield)

County of Stockholm Stuttgart Region

Turin Metropolitan Area VOR Region (Vienna)

Vilnius Warsaw

> The rates of coverage of operational cost by fare revenues are also varying greatly, some cities covermore than 50 % of operational cost with fare revenues but others are far from it. In average among thosemetropolitan areas surveyed, the operational costs of public transport in 2012 are covered 48.2 % by farerevenues and 45.6 % by subsidies, which shows an increase of fare revenues and other revenues comparedto last edition (2011).

(16) GDP figure corresponds to PTA area value

(17) In French metropolitan areas (Lyon Urban Community and Paris Ile-de-France) the percentage of "Other revenues" refer to the transport tax(Versement Transport), covering 43.9 % and 40.4 % of operational costs respectively.

Coverage of operational costsBy fare revenues By public subsidies and other revenues

data

2012

PTA City Web Site

41, rue de Châteaudun • F-75009 Paris Tél. + 33 (0) 1 53 59 21 00 • Fax + 33 (0) 1 53 59 21 33

contact@emta.com • www.emta.com

PTA City Web Site STADSREGIO AMSTERDAM www.stadsregioamsterdam.nlATM BARCELONA MoB* www.atm.catVBB BERLIN-BRANDENBURG www.vbb.deCTB BILBAO www.cotrabi.comCENTRO BIRMINGHAM President www.centro.org.ukMRBC BRUSSELS-CAPITALE REGION www.bruxellesmobilite.irisnet.beBKK BUDAPEST MoB* www.bkk.huCMTBC CADIZ BAY www.cmtbc.esMOVIA COPENHAGUE www.movia.dkRMV FRANKFURT www.rmv.deHVV HAMBURG www.hvv.deHSL HELSINKI MoB* www.hsl.fiTfL LONDON www.tfl.gov.ukSYTRAL LYON www.sytral.frCRTM MADRID Vice President www.crtm.esAMT MONTREAL www.amt.qc.caRUTER OSLO www.ruter.noSTIF PARIS ILE-DE-FRANCE Vice President www.stif.infoROPID PRAGUE www.ropid.czMRDH ROTERDAM - DEN HAAG www.mrdh.nl / www.haaglanden.nlCTAS SEVILLA www.consorciotransportes-sevilla.comSYPTE SHEFFIELD (resigned from membership on March 2013) www.sypte.co.ukSL STOCKHOLM Treasurer www.sl.seVRS STUTTGART www.region-stuttgart.orgAMMT TORINO www.mtm.torino.itVOR VIENNA MoB* www.vor.atMESP VILNIUS www.vilniustransport.ltZTM WARSAW www.ztm.waw.pl

MoB* : Member of the Board

Sour

ces

: Glo

bal D

igita

l Ele

vatio

n M

odel

(SRT

M),

GTOP

O30

MEMBERS AS OF 1ST JANUARY 2014