energy efficiency lecture business of energy seminar december 2014 department name here

41
Energy Efficiency Lecture Business of Energy Seminar December 2014 DEPARTMENT NAME HERE

Upload: terry-elderkin

Post on 16-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Energy Efficiency LectureBusiness of Energy Seminar

December 2014

DEPARTMENT NAME HERE

Today’s Agenda

• Energy Efficiency 101• Business Model 1: Ratepayer funded programs• Business Model 2: Rate design and On-Bill Financing• Business Model 3: ESCO model and Off-Bill Financing

Energy Efficiency 101

What is wrong with this house?

5

Electricity: Segments in Vertical Chain

• High voltage: 120kV+

• Long distance• Low energy loss

due to low resistance

• Nuclear (>1000MW)

• Hydroelectric (100 MW – 10,000 MW)

• Fossil-fuel (>1000 MW)

• Gas Turbine (<200 MW)

• Medium voltage: 2kV – 35 kV

• Medium to short distance

• Residential• Commercial• Industrial• Municipal

services

Regulated Electric Utility (franchise monopoly)

Retail

DistributionGeneration

Transmission

6

Why Electricity is Different

1. Electricity has the following unique challenges:1. High demand volatility

2. Negligible storage capacity requiring “just-in-time” delivery

3. No viable substitutes resulting in price inelastic demand curve

2. Deregulated power industry susceptible to significant market clearing price fluctuations due to supply or demand shocks without sufficient reserve capacity

1 Source: David Besanko, powerpoint presentation “The California Power Crisis: Day One” MECN430, Winter 2006

7

Electricity Demand VolatilityTotal California Load Profile for Hot Day, 19991

1 Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, taken from http://www.mpoweruk.com/electricity_demand.htm, 4.26.2014

Electricity demand trends:• Spikes during

working hours due to commercial consumption

• Peaks during hottest time of the day

• Residential consumption is dominant in evenings

• Industrial and agricultural consumption are flat

Defining Demand Management

Program Load Impact Graph

Energy Efficiency and Conservation

Shift down

Demand Response Shave down

Distributed generation Shift down or shave down (depends on intermittency of resource)

Energy Storage Smooth

Pricing Programs (Time-of-use, etc)

Smooth and/or shift down

Tools for Demand Management

Energy Efficiency Program Types

•Customer gets $ to install equipment that is more efficient than they would have otherwise purchased.

•Ex: CFL rebate Time of Sale•Developers get $ and support to install more efficient equipment and construction practices•Ex: Building shell and mechanicalNew Construction•Customers get financial incentive and support to upgrade existing equipment•Ex: Air sealing and insulationRetrofit•Customer gets $ to replace equipment early•Ex: RefrigeratorsEarly Replacement•Customers get free equipment and products installed at no cost•Ex: Apartment upgradesDirect Install

4 Decades of Energy Efficiency in CA

The Rosenfeld Curve

Energy Savings and State TRMsLow-flow showerhead, 25 therms

Furnace, 100 therms

Pasta cooker, 1300

therms

LED streetlight, 300 kWh

Business Model 1: Ratepayer funded programs

Utility Energy Efficiency Market Drivers & Barriers

14

PUC regulations Resource planning Customer satisfaction Corporate strategy Company KPIs Funding stability Political factors Codes & standards

Why would a utility willingly (or even unwillingly) want to sell less of their product?

The answer:

&

The process of an IOU petitioning

their regulators to charge their

customers is called a rate case.

The Regulatory Compact

• An investor owned utility (IOU) should provide returns to investors. It is also generally a natural monopoly.

• Because of this monopoly, the IOU is regulated by a state utility commission that authorizes rate increases and sets a fair return on investment to ensure ratepayers receive a fair price.

15

Policy Framework #2 –Required EE Goals

EE Programs can be funded through a rate case or through line

items on the customer’s bill called a

benefits charge, a tariff, or a surcharge

Policy Framework #3 – Decoupling

Decoupling gives IOUs revenues based factors such as capital expenditures and number of customers, not electric/gas sales.

Policy Framework #4 – EE Performance Incentives

Approaches include:• Earn % of program

costs for achieving goal

• Earn share of achieved savings

• Earn % of NPV of avoided costs

• Rate of return for achieving savings

Other Drivers – Electric prices

Can look at rate impacts and bill impacts.

Budget Scope – Midwest and California

21

© CLEAResult, 2014

CA IA IL IN KS KY MI MN MO ND NE OH SD WI $-

$200,000,000 $400,000,000 $600,000,000 $800,000,000

$1,000,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,400,000,000 $1,600,000,000

2013 Electric Efficiency Budgets

IOU Procurement• Who administers an EE program is always a big deal

– IOUs generally need to maintain close relationship with customers. JD Powers scores matter.

• Who implements an EE program is usually less of an issue– California has a requirement that 20%+ of portfolio budgets

are bid to non-IOU companies– Illinois and other Midwest states tend to bid out much larger

portions of their portfolio – e.g., Nicor programs are 99% implementer run

• IOUs issue RFP, Implementers submit bids, bids are scored and info requested, and implementers are called for in-person oral presentations.

22

Competitive Landscape

• Utility companies (ComEd, Nicor Gas, etc)• CLEAResult• Nexant• ICF• Conservation Services Group (CSG) • MEEA and other NGOs• Others• Business opportunities from creating better technologies, better

marketing or customer experience, new (riskier) contract models

Business Model 2: Rate design and On-bill Financing

Unregulated Lemonade

Revenue $500

Costs $300

Taxes $0

Profits $200

$0.50/ cup of lemonade and 1,000 cups sold this year.

Regulated Lemonade

How does the management of this lemonade stand arrive at a rate of $0.12 per cup?Expenses $100

Allowed Returns $15 to spend anywhere

Taxes $0

Revenue Requirement

$115

Sales this year 1000 cups sold

$/cup of lemonade $0.12/cup

Revenue requirement calculation

Rate case price calculation

27

What happens if there are less sales than estimated?Decoupling attempts to fix this issue.

Some Observations

Plain Lemonade

• Ways company can grow:1. Sell more cups of lemonade

with lower prices by keeping production and service costs low

2. Sell more expensive lemonade by providing customers with better customer service

Regulated Lemonade

• Ways company can grow:1. Sell more cups of lemonade with lower

prices by keeping production and service costs low

2. Sell more expensive lemonade by providing customers with better customer service

3. Convince regulator of the need for more major expenses, e.g., poles, smart grid.

4. Convince regulator of a higher return required given associated investor risk

© CLEAResult, 2014

How Rate Regulation Works: A Real Example

How does the management of a utility company arrive at the electric rate you pay each month?

Expenses $100M

Allowed Returns $10M to investors

Taxes $5M

Revenue Requirement

$115M

Sales this year 1B kWh sold

$/kWh price $0.115/kWh

Revenue requirement calculation

Rate case price calculation

Rates & Charges

29

Alternative Rate Structures – Consumption & Demand

Name Description

Seasonally Differentiated

Rates constant for months of similar costs

Time-of-Use Rates vary by time of day. Usually commercial customers.

Block Charges Rates increase/decrease in stairstep fashion.

Critical Peak Pricing Rates are set until a high temperature (or other) event meets set criteria for higher Peak Price rate.

Real-time Pricing Rates change from hour-to-hour according to market prices.

Standby rates for Distributed Gen (incl Net Metering)

Rates designed specifically for customers with rooftop solar or other distributed generation capacity. Covers cost of the utility distribution system, utility generation, and compensates customer for own generation.

30

Customer Charge $15.06

First 500 kWh $0.08

Additional kWh $0.15

Customer Charge $15.06

Off-Peak $0.08

On-Peak $0.15

TOU

Block Charge

On-bill Financing

Competitive Landscape

• Utility companies (ComEd, Nicor Gas, etc)• Retail providers in deregulated markets (Constellation, Integrys,

etc)• Business opportunities from understanding rates and on-bill

financing options and creating programs and products to support

Business Model 3: ESCOs and Off-bill Financing

A Perspective from the Chinese Market

US ESCO Market in International Context

Energy Performance Contracting• There are three common models

used by ESCOs in China: – shared savings (50%) – guaranteed savings (35%)– the energy management

outsourcing model or chauffer model. (15%)

IndustryBuildingTransportation

Energy Performance Contract Projects in Different Sectors

Energy Performance Contracting -History• 1992-1994. Global Environmental Funding and World Bank did a study for “Carbon Dioxide

Emission Control Issue in China”. They also discussed the potential of Energy Performance Contract in Chinese market.

• Dec. 1998. Phase one began. Three pilot ESCOs are founded. To the end of Phase one in Jun.2006, they completed 475 projects for 405 customers. Saving 1,510,000 ton standard coal per year, 5,320,000 ton CO2 per year.

• 2003. Phase two began. (1) EMCA was founded, which is an energy efficiency commission that works on supporting customers and ESCOs. (2) Using $22,000,000 funding provided by WB, China government increases ESCOs’ credit level and give them financing support.

• Jun. 2010. Phase two completed. Which means that Energy Efficiency Program has completed its trial period in China.

Financing Options

Competitive Landscape

• Internationally:– Johnson Controls– Schneider Electric

• Locally:– Effortless Energy– Same international ESCOs operate in IL

In Conclusion….

Big Picture Issues• Who administers an EE program• How Utilities make money (ratemaking) and how they make money

on EE (decoupling, incentive mechanisms)• New contract structures for EE • Who owns EE program data (Smart meters)• Who owns EE savings (Industrial opt-out, carbon markets)• Simplifications on how EE is verified (Smart meters)• Paradigm shifts in how EE is funded (Carbon markets)• Paradigm shifts in how EE is justified (EE as

a supply-side resource) • How codes impact savings (federal/state)

41