engagement results of the anewspring minimooc on online ...€¦ · 10 tips for designing e˝ective...

anewspring.com Engagement results of the aNewSpring MiniMOOC on Online Social Learning participants signed up in total, randomly divided over five groups. different countries were represented with most participants coming from The Netherlands, followed by the United Kingdom, the United States, Belgium, South Africa and Australia. 19 15 20 18 81 102 87 91 99 13 group 1 180 participants group 2 179 participants group 3 179 participants group 4 179 participants group 5 179 participants 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Participants that signed up, started and finished per group finished started signed up No. of participants: 48.5% of all sign-ups did not participate 51.5% of all sign-ups actively participated 9.5% 100% completion 1.9% < 100% 5.6% < 75% 13.2% < 50% 21.3% < 25% Of all sign-ups the completion rate was 9,5% (7,2% to 11,6%). 51.5% ranging from 45,0% to 57,0% per group. of sign-ups actively took part of the MiniMOOC, 18.5% of all active participants fully completed the MiniMOOC, ranging from 16,0% to 22.0% per group. 2401 COMMENTS In total 2401 comments ranging from 344 to 559 per group. AVERAGE DISCUSSION LENGTH In total the average was 2.2 ranging from 1.8 to 2.6 per group. 1096 DISCUSSIONS In total 1096 discussions ranging from 189 to 243 per group. AVERAGE REACTIONS PER ACTIVE PARTICIPANT In total the average was 5.2 ranging from 3.8 to 6.6 per group. LONGEST DISCUSSION In total 15 reactions back and forth. NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTIONS PER (%) ACTIVE PARTICIPANT 20 or more 4.1% 11 to 20 7.0% 3 to 5 11.7% 0 41.7% 6 to 10 8.7% 1 or 2 26.7% A total of 2401 comments were made in 1096 discussions, with the longest discussion consisting of 15 comments. 58.3% of all participants commented, with 51 of them (11.1%) making more than 10 comments and an average number of contributions per active participant of 5.2. The size of circle = average number of reactions per active participant 350 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 400 450 500 550 COMPLETION RATE TOTAL NUMBER OF REACTIONS GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 GROUP 4 GROUP 5 The group with the fewest total number of reactions and the lowest average number of reactions per active participant had the highest completion rate. Reactions VS. Completion rate A higher number of total reactions in a group did not result in a higher completion rate. Can you design social learning (by Ben Betts) 256 87 10 Tips For Designing Effective Social Learning 202 92 Bandura's Social Learning Theory And Beyond 199 75 Social constructivism (by Steve Wheeler) 148 62 The role of the moderator 111 48 REACTIONS DISCUSSIONS Top 5 most discussed content pieces

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Report

Download

Embed Size (px):

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Engagement results of the aNewSpring MiniMOOC on Online ...€¦ · 10 Tips For Designing E˝ective Social Learning 202 92 Bandura's Social Learning Theory And Beyond 199 75 Social

anewspring.com

Engagement results of the aNewSpring MiniMOOC on Online Social Learning

participants signed up in total, randomly divided over five groups.

different countries were representedwith most participants coming from The Netherlands, followed by the United Kingdom, the United States, Belgium, South Africa and Australia.

102

13group 1180 participants

group 2179 participants

group 3179 participants

group 4179 participants

group 5179 participants

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20

Participants thatsigned up, started

and �nishedper group

finished

started

signed up

No. of participants:

48.5% of all sign-upsdid not participate

51.5% of all sign-upsactively participated

9.5%100% completion1.9%

< 100%

5.6%< 75%

13.2%< 50%

21.3%< 25%

Of all sign-ups the completion rate was 9,5% (7,2% to 11,6%).

51.5%ranging from 45,0% to 57,0% per group.

of sign-ups actively took part of the MiniMOOC,

18.5%of all active participants fully completed the MiniMOOC, ranging from 16,0% to 22.0% per group.

2401 COMMENTS

In total 2401 comments ranging from 344 to 559 per group.

AVERAGE DISCUSSIONLENGTH

In total the average was 2.2 ranging from 1.8 to 2.6 per group.

1096DISCUSSIONS

In total 1096 discussions ranging from 189 to 243 per group.

AVERAGE REACTIONS PER ACTIVE PARTICIPANT

In total the average was 5.2 ranging from 3.8 to 6.6 per group.

LONGEST DISCUSSION

In total 15 reactions back and forth.

NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTIONS PER (%) ACTIVE PARTICIPANT

20 or more

4.1%

11 to 207.0%

3 to 511.7%

041.7%

6 to 108.7%

1 or 226.7%

A total of 2401 comments were made in 1096 discussions, with the longest discussion consisting of 15 comments.

58.3% of all participants commented, with 51 of them (11.1%) making more than 10 comments and an average number of

contributions per active participant of 5.2.

The size of circle = average number of reactions per active participant

350

25%

20%

15%

10%

0%400 450 500 550

COM

PLET

ION

RAT

TOTAL NUMBER OF REACTIONS GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 GROUP 4 GROUP 5

The group with the fewest total number of reactions and the lowest average number of reactions per active participant had the highest completion rate.

Reactions VS. Completion rate

A higher number of total reactions in a group did not result in a higher completion rate.

Can you design social learning (by Ben Betts) 256 87

10 Tips For Designing E�ective Social Learning 202 92

Bandura's Social Learning Theory And Beyond 199 75

Social constructivism (by Steve Wheeler) 148 62

The role of the moderator 111 48

REACTIONS DISCUSSIONSTop 5 most discussed content pieces

Learning is Social: Connected Learning

TheoriesofLearning. Behaviorism Cognitivism Social Learning Theory Social Learning Theory

Social Emotional Learning and Social Justice Learning at ......Researchers also evaluated how social emotional learning and social justice education were conceptualized at each school

albert bandura's theory