english june 21st- 2020 › wp-content › uploads › 2020 › 06 › ...2020/06/21 · prepared...
TRANSCRIPT
Prepared by Economic Research Unit I ALSHALL Consulting Co. I Tel: + 965 22451535 I Fax: +965 22422619
Volume 30 – Issue 24 – 21st June 2020ALSHALL Weekly Economic Report
1 2 3Foreign DirectInvestment
The WeeklyPerformanceof Boursa Kuwait
Crisis of Tradingin Banks’ Shares
1Foreign DirectInvestment
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) issued its thirtieth annual report on direct invest-ment in the world for the year 2020 which predicts investment trends and expectations after the Corona pandemic and predicts a decrease in foreign direct investment because global foreign direct investment flows are expected to decrease by up to 40% in 2020 versus its 2019 value of US$ 1.54 trillion. This would make foreign direct investment less than one trillion dollars for the first time since 2005. FDI is expected to decrease by 5% to 10% in 2021 and that recovery will begin in 2022 with the return of FDI to the pre-pandemic state. The forecast depends on the long-term health crisis and on the efficacy of political interventions to mitigate its economic impacts. There is also uncertainty about the increase in geopo-litical and financial risks and the persistence of trade tensions. The pandemic represents a shock in the supply and demand policy concerning FDI as a result of the closure procedures of the existing investment projects.
The largest 5,000 companies worldwide, which account for most of the global FDI, have witnessed a drop in their profits byan average of about 40%. This drop-in profits will affect the reinvested profits which represent on average more than 50% of the FDI. Indicators confirm the fast impact as new invest-ment project announcements and mergers and acquisitions decreased by more than 50% in the early months of 2020 com-pared to last year. New deals in financing global projects have retreated by more than 40% though they are an important source of investment in infrastructure projects. Developing economies are expected to witness the biggest drop in foreign direct investment because they are more dependent on invest-ment in global industries as they are unable to provide the same economic support compared with the advanced economies.
Among developed countries, FDI inflows to Europe are expect-ed to drop by 30% to 45%, i.e. much more than North America and other advanced economies because the European Alliance has been affected more by the crisis due to their economies’ fragility. FDI inflows to Africa are expected to decrease by
25% to 40% in 2020. The negative trend will aggravate due to lower basic commodities’ prices. FDI inflows to Africa have indeed decreased by 10% and scored US$ 45 billion in 2019.
Inflows to developing Asia are expected to be severely affected due to its weakness in the supply chain. As such, FDI is expect-ed to drop by 30% to 45%. In 2019 FDI inflows to developing Asian countries decreased by 5% and scored US$ 474 billion despite gains achieved by emerging economies in Southeast Asia, China and India.
FDI is expected to decrease by about 50% in 2020 in Latin America and the Caribbean due to increased political distur-bances which negatively affect their economies. Besides, features of the FDI industry in the region also make it vulnera-ble to danger. Contrary to 2019 when foreign direct investment in Latin America and the Caribbean region grew by 10% and scored US$164 billion.
FDI inflows to the economies-in-transition are expected to decrease by 30% to 45% as the decline will largely nullify the FDI recovery noting that FDI grew by 59% in 2019 and scored US$55 billion after several years of low flows. Expectations for FDI in structurally weak and fragile economies is very nega-tive. Many of the least developed countries depend on FDI in the extractive industries; many states of the developing small island geography depend on investment in tourism. Land-locked developing countries are disproportionately affect-ed by the supply chain obstacles. In 2019, FDI inflows to the least developed countries decreased by 6% (US$ 21 billion). This represents 1.4% only of global FDI.
Despite the significant decline in global FDI inflows during the crisis, the international production system will continue to play an important role in economic growth and development. Global foreign direct investment inflows will remain positive and will continue to add to the existing FDI stock which scored US$ 36 trillion at the end of 2019.
1
2
2Crisis of Trading inBanks’ Shares
The Chairman of the Banks’ Union issued a statement during the working hours of the Stock exchange on June 10th 2020, warning that the banks will be unable to distrib-ute cash dividends for the year 2020. This statement caused a sharp and general drop in prices especially in banks’ prices knowing that banks usually contribute by more than 61.8% to the market value of all listed compa-nies as of the closing of June 9th 2020. The drop (in prices) created a crisis and all relevant involved parties were blamed. There were controversial views concerning the error cause. In our opinion, the error was not in the substance of justice in non-distribution but in the state-ment’s text, timing, and subsequent procedures.
The substance was in the inability of beneficiary banks from the subsidy/support whether by reducing their capital strength requirements’ fenders, or by the need for deposits with easy terms by distributing profits that violate fair com-petition rules with banks that do not benefit from the support (subsidy). Besides, the achieved revenues are supposed to be used to restore the banks’ fenders’ sound-ness and as the future is full of unprecedented risks that call upon affected banks to build new fenders. Non-benefi-ciary banks control their decision. All the foregoing remains logical and within justice and hedging principles. What the banks achieve will reinforce their capital posi-tion and non-distribution will increase the shareholders’ rights. In other words, it is a postponed benefit for share-holders.
In our opinion, the error lies in the direction process. The statement was not sufficient enough to distinguish between the beneficiary and non-beneficiary banks. It seemed as if it deprived general assemblies of their deci-sion. It was supposed to be phrased in a better and more professional manner. We believe that it was supposed to be phrased during the Central Bank’s leadership meeting with the banks’ CEOs on June 8th 2020, and it was supposed to be announced immediately after that day’s meeting to avoid its leakage. We also believe that the statement timing was supposed to be announced after the end and not during the Boursa trading. We also believe that coordina-tion about the content and the timing was supposed to be after consultation with the CMA. Even with the error in issuing the statement, CMA was not supposed to remedy it by canceling all of Wednesday’s June 15th 2020 trading while it could have stopped trading simultaneously with the statement’s issuance and could have punished all trad-ers who benefited from leaked information. The cancella-tion was unprecedented with an unjustifiable cost.
Certainly, the error occurred with substantial costs. Howev-er, there is some exaggeration in assessing the costs and their impact on the prospects of upgrading the Boursa and the foreign turn out of investing therein. Most of the nega-tive impact, if achieved, pertains to the major global crisis and its local repercussions. It also relates to the probable financial performance of listed companies and not to a one-day event. Having said that, we believe that we should benefit from the errors especially those of phrasing and timing which should not reoccur. Coordination between CBK and CMA should be permanent as their functions are closely interrelated.
The following tables summarize last week’s performance of Boursa Kuwait
Working days 5 4
AlShall index (33 Companies) 442.4 446.0 -0.8%
Boursa All Share Market Index 4,186.1 4,242.1 -1.3%
Value Trade (KD) 155,728,551 183,454,965
Daily average (KD) 31,145,710 45,863,741 -32.1%
Volume Trade (Shares) 757,779,983 945,745,606
Daily average (Shares) 151,555,997 236,436,402 -35.9%
Transactions 37,028 39,056
Daily average (Transactions) 7,406 9,764 -24.2%
DescriptionWeek 24
18/06/2020Week 23
11/06/2020Diff%
3The Weekly Performance of Boursa Kuwait
The performance of Boursa Kuwait for last week was less active, where the traded value, traded volume, number of transactions and the general index decreased (AlShall index). AlShall Index (value weighted) closed at 442.4
points as of last Thursday, showing a decrease by 3.6 points or by 0.8% compared with its level last week. It remained lower by 110.8 points or by 20% compared with the end of 2019.
3
Most Active Sectors & Companies
ALSHALL INDEX Week 2418/06/2020
Week 23 11/06/2020
Description
Sectors
Value Traded
KD
% of Total
Market
Kuwait Finance House
National Bank of Kuwait
Ahli United Bank Kuwait (B.S.C)
Agility Public Warehousing Company
Gulf Bank
Total
Description
Sectors
Banks Sector
Industrials Sector
Financial Services Sector
Telecommunications Sector
Real Estate Sector
33,017,757
25,834,559
14,369,162
9,361,201
9,167,307
91,749,985
Value Traded
KD
102,535,438
20,388,438
11,008,707
8,949,545
7,930,385
21.2%
16.6%
9.2%
6.0%
5.9%
58.9%
% of Total
Market
65.8%
13.1%
7.1%
5.7%
5.1%
Increased Value (# of Companies)
Decreased Value (# of Companies)
Unchanged Value (# of Companies)
Total Companies
10
15
8
33
16
10
7
33
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
National Bank Of Kuwait
Gulf Bank
Commercial Bank Of Kuwait
Al-Ahli Bank Of Kuwait
Kuwait International Bank
Ahli United Bank
Burgan Bank
Kuwait Finance Bank
Banking Sector
Commercial Facilities Company
International Financial Advisors
National Investments Company
Kuwait Projects Company (Holding)
Coast Investment & Development Company
Investment Sector
Kuwait Insurance Company
Gulf Insurance Company
Al-Ahleia Insurance Company
Warba Insurance Company
Company Name Thu Thu Diff Close
18/06/2020 11/06/2020 % 2019
Diff
%
542.8
171.5
516.0
113.9
200.3
278.5
209.0
1,989.5
518.4
148.0
92.5
125.7
448.1
43.7
180.9
72.5
358.1
159.6
68.0
549.1
172.3
490.2
115.9
203.7
286.2
209.0
2,039.6
524.4
153.0
92.5
124.6
440.3
45.1
181.3
69.5
358.1
150.2
69.4
(1.1)
(0.5)
5.3
(1.7)
(1.7)
(2.7)
0.0
(2.5)
(1.1)
(3.3)
0.0
0.9
1.8
(3.1)
(0.2)
4.3
0.0
6.3
(2.0)
706.9
246.2
545.9
167.6
297.0
358.5
328.1
2,492.0
668.5
156.6
160.3
173.7
566.1
54.7
222.9
72.8
376.4
160.7
50.8
(23.2)
(30.3)
(5.5)
(32.0)
(32.6)
(22.3)
(36.3)
(20.2)
(22.5)
(5.5)
(42.3)
(27.6)
(20.8)
(20.1)
(18.8)
(0.4)
(4.9)
(0.7)
33.9
5
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Insurance Sector
Kuwait Real Estate Company
United Realty Company
National Real Estate Company
Salhiaha Real Estate Company
Real Estate Sector
The National Industries
Refrigeration Industries Co
Gulf Cable & Electrical Industries
Industrial Sector
Kuwait National Cinemas
The Public Warehousing Co
Mobile Telecommunications Co (ZAIN)
Safat Energy Co
Services Sector
Livestock Transport & Trading Co
Danah Alsafat Foodstuff Company
Food Sector
Sharjah Cement Co
Gulf Cement Co
Umm Al-Qaiwain Cement Industries
Non Kuwaiti Companies
General Index
Company Name Thu Thu Diff Close
14/05/2020 07/05/2020 % 2019
Diff
%
138.7
145.0
112.2
193.1
1,433.4
180.9
151.0
275.9
200.6
151.2
471.4
3,510.6
1,018.8
18.0
1,256.1
152.5
10.9
451.8
175.8
152.8
490.8
169.7
446.0
2.7
3.7
0.0
1.9
(2.8)
0.1
(2.4)
8.2
4.0
2.0
0.0
(0.6)
(1.2)
(8.3)
(0.9)
2.8
(1.8)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
(0.8)
144.7
189.1
125.0
253.6
1,683.8
221.8
215.3
370.8
195.0
190.3
657.8
4,198.3
1,134.3
21.3
1,460.6
145.8
14.5
450.6
175.8
221.4
490.8
181.7
553.2
(1.5)
(20.5)
(10.2)
(22.4)
(17.3)
(18.3)
(31.5)
(19.5)
7.0
(19.0)
(28.3)
(16.9)
(11.3)
(22.5)
(14.7)
7.5
(26.2)
0.5
0.0
(31.0)
0.0
(6.6)
(20.0)
142.5
150.4
112.2
196.7
1,393.1
181.1
147.4
298.5
208.6
154.2
471.4
3,490.1
1,006.3
16.5
1,245.4
156.7
10.7
452.8
175.8
152.8
490.8
169.7
442.4
6
Home of trustalshall.com