english version report on-tot-fs-bantenwds17jan 10 tot and... · 1 report on the implementation on...

1

REPORT on

The Implementation on Training of Trainers and

Evaluation of District/Municipality Field Staff Tr aining

on HPAI Prevention and Control

at Banten Province

(Indonesia- Netherlands Partnership Programme

on HPAI Prevention and Control)

Program : Training of Trainer on Prevention and Co ntrol of HPAI Dates : June 8 – 19, 2009 Location : Hotel Sari Kuning, Jl.Raya Cilegon - Ba nten

Program : Implementation of Districts and Municipa lities Field Staff Training on HPAI Prevention and Control at Banten Province

Dates : Serang, July 31 – August, 13 2009 Location : Hotel Wisata Baru, Jl. Maulana Yusuf No . 16, Serang–Banten and Hotel Mahadria, Jl. Ki Mas Jong, Serang – Bant en

October 2009

• AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK SERVICES AGENCY, BANTEN P ROVINCE

• WAGENINGEN INTERNATIONAL, GOVERNMENT OF NETHERLAND

• CENTER FOR HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AND APPLIE TECHNOLOGY

2

CONTENTS

Pages

Content ..... ............................................................................................................. ii

List of tables............................................................................................................ iii

List of appendixes..................................................................................................... iv

I Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background ................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Aims and Objectives 1.2.1.Aims and Objectives of Training of Trainers (ToT) ………………….. 1.2.2.Aims and Objectives of Field Staff Training …………………………..

3 3 4

1.3 Scope of Evaluation ................................................................................... 4

II. Methodology ....................................................................................................... 6

2.1 Time and Location ............................................................................... ..... 6

2.2 Data Sources and Instruments ............................................................. ..... 6

2.3 Data Collection …………...…………………………………………………….. 6

2.4 Data Analysis ……………...……………………………………………………. 7

III. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................

3.1. The Implementation of Training of Trainers on HPAI................................. 8

3.2. Evaluation of Field Staff Training Implementation ....................................... 16

3.3 The Refresher Course …………………………………………………………. 15

3.4 The visiting and monitoring activity by consultant ....................................... 16

3.5. Action Plan ..................................................................................................

IV. Conclusions and Recommendations ……………………………………………. 20

4.1. Conclusions ...............................................................................................

4.2. Recommendations ......................................................................................

21

22

V. Closing ………………………………………………………………………………. 21

3

LIST OF TABLES

No. Contents Pages

1 Distribution of training participants according to districts or municipalities.. 8

2 Distribution of participants according to age, sex and education ............... 9

3

4.

Name of Facilitators for Training for Trainers ........................................

Group and Topic in Training of Trainers on HPAI .....................…………

10

11

5 The Participant’s score of pre-test and post-test ...................................... 10

6 Appreciation of Topics by participants in Training of Trainers on HPAI..... 12

7 Distribution of training participants according to districts or municipalities 16

8 Distribution of Field Staff Training’s participants according to age ………. 17

9

10

Share of male/female participant in Field Staff Training ...........................

Distribution of field staff training participant according to formal education

16

11 Training Facilitatorsfor Field Staff Training ........................................... 17

12

13.

14.

15

16.

17

Group and Topic in Field Staff Training ………………………………………

Average score of pre-test and post-test in Group A-D ...............................

Programme of the refresher course for the facilitators at Banten Province

Problem Inventory and Solution on Field Staff Training

The schedule of visiting of evaluation and monitoring consultant of the

field staff training on HPAI prevention and control

Action plans of participants related to HPAI prevention and control activity

18

19

4

LIST OF APPENDIXES

No. Contents Pages

1 Terms of Reference for the Assignment of the Monitoring and Evaluation consultant for District/City Field Staff Training on HPAI Prevention and Control ………………………………………………………………

22

2 Name of Participants of Districts/Municipalities Field Staff Training on HPAI Prevention and Control ……………………………………………………………..

23

3 Questionnaire for Field Staff Training Participant ……………………………….. 31

4 Questionnaire (for Trainers) for monitoring and evaluation of preparation and implementation Field Staff Training on HPAI Prevention and Control ...............

32

5 Examples of action plans as prepared by individual participants

5

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background

A lot of attention was given by the government of Indonesia to HPAI or Avian Influenza.

Up to now Avian Influenza has caused death to ten million chickens, and based on data from

KOMNAS in 2005 until January 2009 totally AI cases in humans are 141 cases and caused 115

people deaths. More attention has been given to Avian Influenza than to any other contagious

disease because of the potential great losses as a result of Avian Influenza, such as: 1) Avian

Influenza causes human casualties; 2) Avian Influenza can cause an epidemic or a pandemic

(although so far infections from human to human have not happened); and 3) the danger for an

Avian Influenza pandemic causes countries to be highly alert for HPAI.

Based on ‘National Strategic Plan for Avian Influenza Prevention and Control and

Pandemic Influenza Preparedness’, the FBPI national committee have coordinated with all

stakeholders implementation of the following 6 basic strategies:

1. Socialization and communication to community about the dangers of Avian Influenza and

about prevention and control steps;

2. Detection and comprehensive surveillance programmes in poultry and humans;

3. Virus handling at its source (in poultry) including biosecurity measures, vaccination, and

controlled stamping-out;

4. Preparation of health facilities, public health centres and hospitals in order to be alert and

ready for treating Avian Influenza patients;

5. Conduct simulation and preparation for Avian Influenza pandemic;

6. Coordinate steps for restructuring of the poultry sector to control H5N1 virus and safeguard

farmers’ incomes and to provide safe and healthy chickens for consumers.

Banten Province is one of the provinces most affected by the highly pathogenic avian

influenza virus strain H5N1 since at the beginning 2004, besides the two other provinces,

namely DKI Jakarta and West Java. The poultry business and the livelihoods of millions of small

farmers are affected by continued outbreaks with high production losses and high mortality in

poultry. The virus can also infect humans and up June 2009 30 people have been infected in

Banten Province of whom 27 have died following the infection with HPAI virus. The virus has

spread to many areas in Indonesia, 31 out of the 33 provinces have now been infected. Over

150 people have been infected and 115 died from Avian Influenza infection since the beginning

of 2004. Ministry of Agricultural has officially declared that Indonesia is infected with highly

6

pathogenic avian influenza virus. Based on this declaration, Director General of Livestock

Services (DGLS) released the Decision Letter, number 17/Kpts/PD.640/F/02.04 about Guidance

to Prevention, Control and Eradication of contagious influenza in poultry (avian influenza). At

present the province of Banten as well as the districts in Banten have insufficient skilled field

technicians to carry out this work, and a structured training programme is required to improve

skills and knowledge for field staff of Dinas Pertanian and Peternakan (Agriculture and Livestock

Agency), of the Banten Province

To improve efforts for prevention and control for Avian Influenza in districts or

municipalities in Western Java trained field staff is needed who have knowledge, experience

and skills related to Avian Influenza. This is necessary in order that field staff engage on a

regular basis in activities for prevention and control. Within the framework of the cooperation

programme between the Indonesia-Netherlands HPAI Partnership for the Prevention and

Control of HPAI and Government of Indonesia especially with Agriculture and Livestock

Services agency Banten Province, a Training of Trainers – ToT has been conducted from June

8 to June 19, 2009 at Sari Kuring Hotel, Cilegon-Banten. In this ToT, 12 veterinarians were

trained to become trainers and facilitators in courses on HPAI prevention and control for field

staff. Seven veterinarians are from Agriculture and Livestock Services agency of districts or

municipalities in Banten Province and five veterinarians form the office of Agriculture and

Livestock Services agency of Banten Province

As follow-up of ToT activity, Agriculture and Livestock Services agency of Banten

Province will conduct training for 160 field staff of the Livestock Services during 2009 and 2010.

Four courses for the field staff were conducted in the period July and August, 2009. Four groups

of each three trainers conducted a course for 20 participants; total 80 field staff was trained in

the Banten Province.

This is the report of Dr. Widiyanto Dwi Surya who was assigned by the Indonesia-

Netherlands HPAI Partnership for the Prevention and Control of HPAI and by Agriculture and

Livestock services agency of Banten province as a trainer in the implementation of ToT and also

as a monitoring and evaluation consultant for the training courses for field staff on HPAI

prevention and control. The TOR for assignment of Widiyanto (see appendix 1).

This report on the implementation of ToT and the evaluation of the field staff training in

Banten province provides inputs for preparation and implementation of the next series of

courses in order to improve the quality of the next training.

7

1.2. Aims and Objectives

1.2.1. Aim and Objectives of the Training of Traine rs

The overall aim of the course is to provide the participants (the new trainers) with a clear

perspective, knowledge and skills for planning, organizing and conducting training courses for

field staff of Dinas Pertanian and Peternakan Province Banten on Prevention and Control of

HPAI.

Objectives:

After the training the participants should be able to:

a. Plan, organize and implement courses for Dinas Pertanian and Peternakan field staff

on Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza;

b. To conduct training sessions in a participatory manner, inviting participants to bring

forward and share experiences and problems in their field of work;

c. Have presentations prepared and be able to conduct theoretical lectures, practical

demonstrations and hands-on training on:

• Pathogens Poultry Disease;

• Immunology and vaccination;

• Diagnosis and Control of Poultry Diseases

• Avian Influenza and Epidemiology

• New Castle (ND) and Epidemiology

• Autopsy, vaccination and sampling technique;

• Biosecurity and biosafety;

• Sampling, labelling and transport conditions of samples from poultry;

• Preparation of case reports of suspected bird flu cases and outbreaks;

• Communication and Teaching Technique

• Training and Use Aids for Field Conditions Lectures

• Preparation of socialization programmes on the prevention and control of avian

influenza in the Village;

• Conducting a socialization programmes and campaign in the village;

8

Further the participants should have obtained enough knowledge to explain and answer

questions from participants on the following topics:

• Implementation and preparation of HPAI prevention and control campaigns;

• The current government regulations and guidelines on HPAI prevention and control;

• The biosafety and biosecurity regulations for staff dealing with suspected poultry;

• Advising farmers on practical and effective bio security measures on their farms;

• The requirements for and implementation of surveillance programs;

• Organization and implementation of awareness programs in the rural areas on HPAI

• All necessary administrative procedures and reporting in relation to the implementation of

programs related to the prevention and control of HPAI;

1.2.2. Aim and Objectives of the Field Staff Train ing

The objectives of the evaluation of the training for field staff in Banten Province were:

a. To evaluate the effectiveness of Field Staff Training:

Training targets for the field staff were used to determine the effectiveness of training. The

training is effective if targets or results set for the training are reached.

b. Continuous improvement

The evaluation of Field staff training was a continuous process and used to evaluate the

strengths and the weaknesses in the implementation of the course. This evaluation can be

used as reference to improve quality of the next training.

1.3. The Scope of the evaluation

According to Jack J Phillips and Ron Drew Stone in Teguh Satriono and Andree (2002),

the evaluation of training activity could be conducted in 5 steps:

a. Phase 1: Reaction

Evaluation of training in this phase is intended to measure satisfaction of training participant

according to participant perception. Reaction was measured by parameters that relate to

quality of training, facilitator and training facility.

b. Phase 2: Learning

Evaluation of training in this phase is intended to evaluate about impact of training program

for participant. The impact could be measured in terms of improvement of knowledge, skills

9

and behaviour of participants. Evaluation was through comparing the results of pre-test and

post-test from each participant.

c. Phase 3 : Application/Behaviour

This phase considers the impact of the training programme on the work of the trainee; e.g.

how far how far knowledge, skills and behaviour are applied in the daily work;

d. Phase 4 : Result (Organization Impact/Result)

This phase considers the efficacy of training program according to perception of employer

or organization (livestock services agency in districts or municipalities). This evaluation

measures as impact of training the performance of the trainee in working environment. The

parameters to evaluate the efficacy of training program were quality, quantity, time, habit,

cost and satisfaction of the customer satisfaction of the farmer;

e. Phase 5 : ROTI (Return on Training Investment)

Evaluation of training in this phase is conducted to evaluate rate of return of investment in

the cost of the training, by formula:

ROTI = Total of advantage - total of cost x 100 %

Total Cost

The scope of evaluation for Training of Trainer (ToT) focussed mainly at level 1

(reaction), level 2 (learning) and level 3 (application/behaviour). Meanwhile, the evaluation

scope of field staff training (phase 1) focussed mainly at level 1 (reaction) and level 2 (learning).

The evaluation of both trainings was measured by collection of data and information from

facilitator and from participants. Data were collected through direct observation, questionnaires

and direct interviews.

10

CHAPTER II

METHOD OF EVALUATION

2.1. Time and Location

The Training for Trainers (ToT) has been conducted in Hotel Sari Kuring, Jl. Raya

Cilegon-Banten on 8 June up to 19 June 2009.

The Districts/Municipalities Field Staff Training at Banten Province has been conducted

for 4 groups of Field Staff in Wisata Baru Hotel and Mahadria Hotel in Serang, Banten. This

evaluation was conducted to evaluate phase 1 (2009) of field staff training implementation

during July, 31 up to August, 13 2009.

2.2. Data Sources and Instruments

Primary and secondary data were used in evaluation for ToT and of phase 1 of field staff

training:

1. Primary data were collected directly from facilitators and field staff through direct

observation, data verification, questionnaire survey and interview.

2. Secondary data were collected from reports and information from Livestock Services in the

province and districts /municipalities.

Questionnaires were used as instrument to collect data in this evaluation. The

questionnaire included open and closed questions.

2.3. Data Collection

Data collection methods used in this study were:

1. Observation

Observations were conducted through direct monitoring and supervision during the

Implementation of ToT and during the implementation of field staff training in both locations

2. Interview

Interviews were conducted through discussions with respondents (facilitator or field staff)

using the questionnaire.

11

2.4. Data Analysis

Collected data were analyzed and data presented in text and tables through e.g.;

average, percentage, frequency and distribution tables.

12

CHAPTER III

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

3.1. The Implementation of the Training for Trainer s (TOT) on HPAI

3.1.1. Time and Location

The Training for Trainers (ToT) has been conducted in Hotel Sari Kuring, Jl. Raya

Cilegon-Banten on 8 June up to 19 June 2009.

3.1.2. Participant of The Training for Trainers (TO T)

All participants of Training for Trainers were veterinarian (12 participants) came from 7

districts/cities in Banten Province. Details of the data can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1. Distribution of Participants according to districts or cities.

No. Name District/City Email- Address

1 Drh. Wina Listiana Tangerang City [email protected]

2 Drh. Dina Safitri Cilegon City [email protected]

3 Drh. Ratna Suryaningrum Serang City [email protected]

4 Drh. Achmad Bahtiar Pandegelang District [email protected]

5 Drh. Rina Fismanillah U Serang District [email protected]

6 Drh. Meliyana Tangerang District [email protected]

7 Drh. Hanik Malichatin Lebak District [email protected]

8 Drh. Rina Herviana Banten Province [email protected]

9 Drh. Novia Herwandi Banten Province [email protected]

10 Drh. Indardi Banten Province [email protected]

11 Drh. Intan Sulistyowati Banten Province [email protected]

12 Drh. Endang Setyowati Banten Province [email protected]

13

The age of the ToT participants varied from 26 – 39 years old and 9 were females

(75%). Only three participants (25%) are males. All of them (100%) have graduated from the

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine as veterinarians. Distribution of age, sex and education is shown

in Table 2.

Based on the data, there are 3 participants who had just graduated as a Veterinarian

three years ago (in 2006) and only 2 participants graduated as a Veterinarian more than 10

years ago, Drh. Meliyana (graduated in 1999) and Drh. Dina Safitri (graduated in 1994). Length

of service with Dinas varied at time of the training from 4 (four) months to 9 (nine) years.

Table 2. Distribution of Participants according to age, sex and education

No. Facilitator’s Name Sex Age (years old)

Education and Year’s graduated

1 Drh. Wina Listiana Female 26 DVM, 2007

2 Drh. Dina Safitri Female 39 DVM, 1994

3 Drh. Ratna Suryaningrum Female 31 DVM, 2002

4 Drh. Achmad Bahtiar Male 29 DVM, 2005

5 Drh. Rina Fismanillah Usman Female 33 DVM, 2002

6 Drh. Meliyana Female 34 DVM, 1999

7 Drh. Hanik Malichatin Female 28 DVM, 2006

8 Drh. Rina Herviana Female 28 DVM, 2005

9 Drh. Novia Herwandi Male 30 DVM, 2006

10 Drh. Indardi Male 27 DVM, 2006

11 Drh. Intan Sulistyowati Female 27 DVM, 2005

12 Drh. Endang Setyowati Female 28 DVM, 2005

3.1.3 Training Facilitators

Training Facilitators were 3 (three) experts, namely Teun Pabri, DVM, Herman Patrick,

DVM and DR. Drh. Widiyanto Dwi Surya, MSc. Besides these three experts, also several

trainers invited to present and discuss several topics, namely Drh. Sri Mudjiharti, Ir. H. Agus M,

Drh. Eddy WA, Drh. Ronny Mudigdo, and Drh. Sanusi. Details can be seen in Table 3.

14

Table 3. Name and address of the training facilitator

No. Facilitator’s Name Institution

1 Teun Pabri, DVM (Main Facilitator)

GD-Animal Health Service Deventer, the Netherlands

2 Herman Patrick, DVM (Main Facilitator)

Wageningen UR, Central Institute of Animal Disease Control Houtribweg 39 – 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands

3 DR. Widiyanto D Surya, MSc (Main Facilitator)

Center for Human Resource Development and Applied Technology – CREATE, Jl.Pandawa Raya No.7, Indraprasta Bogor Indonesia. Phone:62-251 8361767

4 Drh. Sri Mudjiharti Balai Penyidikan Penyakit Hewan dan Kesmavet JL Tangkuban Perahu Km 22 CIKOLE, LEMBANG Bandung– West Java Phone/Fax : +6222 2785715 HP : 08121416288/08164871914 Email: [email protected]

5 Drh Ronny Mudigdo Directorate Animal Health-DGLS Departemen Pertanian-Jakarta

6 Ir. H. Agus Tauchid M Dinas Pertanian & Peternakan Prov.Banten Jl.Syeh Nawawi Al Bantani Palima-Serang Telp: 0254-267033;

7 Drh. Eddy Dinas Pertanian & Peternakan Prov.Banten Jl.Syeh Nawawi Al Bantani Palima-Serang Telp: 0254-267033;

8 Drh.H.Sanusi Balai Pengembangan Peternakan dan Pelayanan Keswan-Dinas Pertanian dan Peternakan Prov. Banten, Jl. Raya Cilegon KM 4 Drangon, Serang Telp: 0254-8241730;

9 Arend Jan Nell WUR-Wageningen International Indonesia-Netherlands Partnership on HPAI

3.1.4 Training Topics

The topics included in the ToT programme originate from the programme developed

during the Training of Trainers course in West Java Province on April, 2008. Some improvement

and adjustment of the topics and sub-topics or contents was discussed during the Refresher

course conducted for West Java in Bandung (April 2009). Topics were divided in 5 groups (see

Table 4). Theory and practice material provided can be grouped into 5 (five) groups of topics,

i.e. the technical of poultry diseases topic, communication topic, the practice topic, field and

perspective topic.

15

The topic was given in the form of theory, practice and assignment to the participants.

Assignments for the participants were given in the form of presentation in the classroom and

socialization in the villages. Each group of 2 participants were assigned to simplify (repackage)

each theory that has been submitted to the teaching materials for field staff and deliver it in

classrooms and discussed with participants.

Table 4. Group and Topic in Training of Trainers on HPAI

No. Group Topic Trainer 1 Course

Objectives Course objectives, outline of the course and expectation (hope and fears),

Teun Pabri/ Widiyanto D S

2 Technical Topics 1. Pathogens of Poultry Disease 2. Immunology and vaccination

3. Avian Influenza and epidemiology 4. H5N1 and risk for human Health 5. New castle (ND) Disease

6. Biosecurity and biosafety 7. Biosecurity and biosafety in sector 3/4 8. Sanitation and Disinfection

9. Sampling Technique and transportation

Teun Pabri Patrick Hermans Teun Pabri Teun Pabri Teun Pabri Patrick Hermans Teun Pabri Teun Pabri Sr Mudjiharti

3. Didactic and Communication Topics

1. Principle of Communication 2. Teaching Technique and Extension 3. Teaching in Field Condition and Use Aid for Field Training Condition 4. Socialization and Campaign for HPAI 5. Evaluation of Field Staff Training 6. Action Plan for Trainers and Field Staff

Widiyanto DS Widiyanto DS Widiyanto DS Widiyanto DS Widiyanto DS Widiyanto DS Widiyanto/Teun

4. Field Topic Field Socialization in the village Participants

5. Practical Topics 1.Theori on Vaccination, swabbing and autopsy

2. Practice on sampling technique 3. Practice on vaccination 4. Practice on Autopsy

Teun Fabri Teun/Patrick Teun/Patrick Teun/Patrick

6. Perspective Topics

1. Banten Livestock Policy on HPAI 2. Animal Health Control in Banten Prov. 3. HPAI Prevention and Control Policy in

Indonesia 4. Case Reporting

Ir.H.Agus MT Drh. Eddy WA Drh. Ronny M Drh.H.Sanusi

7. Development field staff course

1. Content, preparation and organizatio Teun/Patrick/Widi /Arend

16

3.1.5. Learning Level

The effect of the training on the knowledge level of the participants during the Training of

Trainers was measured in terms of knowledge improvement, changes in behaviour and skills

learned. Information and data were obtained through conducting a written test at the beginning

of the course and repeating the test at the end. By comparing the test results, changes of the

knowledge improvement from participants before and after the training was used as an

indication for knowledge and understanding gained. Average of pre-test and post-test result of

the training of trainers is shown in Table 5. The average score showed an increase of 58 %.

Table 5. The Participant’s score of pre-test and post-test

No. Name of Participant Pre-Test Post-Test

1 Drh. Wina Listiana 49 81

2 Drh. Dina Safitri 53 81

3 Drh. Ratna Suryaningrum 47 79

4 Drh. Achmad Bahtiar 52 86

5 Drh. Rina Fismanillah Usman 53 83

6 Drh. Meliyana 50 82

7 Drh. Hanik Malichatin 50 79

8 Drh. Rina Herviana 46 81

9 Drh. Novia Herwandi 53 79

10 Drh. Indardi 51 85

11 Drh. Intan Sulistyowati 55 77

12 Drh. Endang Setyowati 61 87

Average score 51.7 81.7

3.1.6. Appreciation for the training

The level of appreciation of the participants for the training of trainers at Banten Province

was evaluated. Appreciation for the training relates to the topics, the facilitators and the

facilities. Data were collected through direct observations and questionnaires.

3.1.6.1. Training Topics

Based on the evaluation result from participants to topics TOT provided by the Facilitators,

the results of the assessment participants were grouped into 3 (three) categories:

17

1. topics which considered the best of the course

2. topics which were considered eye openers (new, giving a new vision) for the

participants

3. topics for which content and presentation could be improved

For results see Table 6.

Table 6. Appreciation of Topics by participants in Training of Trainers on HPAI

(% is percentage of the participants voting for that particular topic).

No. Topic Very good

Open eyes

to be Improved

1 Course objectives, outline of the course and expectation (hope and fears),

2 Technical Topics

1. Pathogens of Poultry Disease 2. Immunology and vaccination

3. Avian Influenza and epidemiology 4. H5N1 and risk for human Health 5. New castle (ND) Disease

6. Biosecurity and biosafety 7. Biosecurity and biosafety in sector 3/4 8. Sanitation and Disinfection

9. Sampling Technique and transportation

77% 29% 95% 60%

- 72% 88% 100% 60%

- -

5% 10%

- 14%

- - -

23% 71%

- 30%

- 14% 12%

- 40%

3 Didactic and Communication Topics

4 1. Principle of Communication 2. Teaching Technique and Extension 3. Teaching in Field Condition and Use Aid for Field Training Condition 4. Socialization and Campaign for HPAI 5. Evaluation of Field Staff Training 6. Action Plan for Trainers and Field Staff

75% 80% 80%

20% 50% 50%

25% 20%

- -

30% -

- -

20%

80% 20% 50%

5 Field Topic: Field Socialization in the village

-

-

100%

6 Practical Topics

1.Theori on Vaccination, swabbing and autopsy 2. Practice on sampling technique 3. Practice on vaccination 4. Practice on Autopsy

100%

80% 60% 90%

-

10% 20% 5%

-

10% 20% 5%

18

No. Topic Very good

Open eyes

to be Improved

7 Perspective Topics

1. Banten Livestock Policy on HPAI

2. Animal Health Control in Banten Prov.

3. HPAI Prevention and Control Policy in Indonesia

4. Case Reporting

-

-

-

-

-

-

90%

-

100%

100%

10%

100%

In general, based on the participants appreciation that facilitators explained the topics

properly, although based on observations and evaluation several issues should be given

attention:

a. Content of the lectures should be simplified (re-packaged more to the level of understanding

and experience of the participants) especially for topic that need in-depth comprehension

like topic of immunology and vaccination; it is suggested to include more discussion in the

training sessions.

b. Facilitators should improve the lectures on: Immunology and vaccination; HPAI diagnosis

and Epidemiology; and Surveillance;

c. Adjustment of the time schedule is necessary to ensure that the preparation of socialization

is put forward in the programme. This enables participants to practice the socialization

presentation in the classroom before conducting it in the field.

3.1.6.2. Training Facilities

In general the training facilities for TOT were of good standard. The implementation of

ToT was conducted in good quality hotel. All of the participants mentioned that the facilities,

including bedroom, classroom, meals, and snacks were of good standard.

3.1.7. Socialization activity

During the training of trainers (ToT) course the participants prepare, practice and

conduct a socialization programme on Avian Influenza in the Village, especially the topic about

how to control and prevent infections of HPAI from birds to birds, and the topic of how to prevent

the HPAI infection from birds to human. The socialization practice was conducted in the village

and implemented in 2 (two) location, namely Village Hall, Rawa Godang Kampong, Citangkil

Village, Serang City (Group A) dan Sambi Manis Kampong, Citangkil Village (Group B). The

background of the target audience was very varied for age, status and occupation. Age of

19

socialization participants range from 25-60 years old and consist of the vaccinator cadre,

housewifes and village officers (pamong desa). In the Rawa Godang kampong, the socialization

was conducted at at Village Hall, and in Sambi Manis Kampong, the socialization was

conducted at the residence of a villager.

A committee of 2 persons was assigned to prepare with the village leaders the

socialization and explain the objectives. This worked well but there were shortcomings in

announcing to the public the socialization sessions through RWs, posters and public

announcements. Based on the observations of the socialization programme the following 2

suggestions are made: (1) participants should practice in the classroom before conducting the

session in the village, this is needed because not all participants have practical experience of

direct socialization in the field; and (2) prepare the topics necessary for the socialization based

on the level of knowledge of the target audience;

Preparations which are essential before conducting socialization programmes:

• Choice of area within the village, which RW;

• Ensure commitment of RW and RTs of the area, and who will be present during socialization

campaign and distribution of the task between facilitator must be clear,

• Select location of the socialization which sitting capacity, easily accessible for community,

lay-out room for good presentation, e.g. extra facilities needed

• Select most suitable time for socialization, beginning and end to ensure that socialization will

be attended by maximum attendance

• Make an estimate of the number of people that are expected to attend the socialization

• Determine steps on how the socialization and the vaccination are announced (e.g. posters

at RW and RT, but also at the shops; repeated announcements from the mosque; spread

the news a few days before actual socialization and vaccination campaign, separate

approach to people owning many poultry), during socialization and vaccination repeated

calls from the mosques

3.2. The Implementation and Evaluation of Field Sta ff Training

3.2.1. Preparation of the training for Field Staff

After completing the Training of Trainers for 12 Veterinarians preparation started

immediately for the implementation of Field Training for the field officers. Participants of ToT

who later served as Trainers / Facilitator served as a committee to make various preparations

for the field training together with Dinas of Provincial level and District/City level.

20

In general, field staff trainings in Banten Province were prepared properly, although

some facilitators mentioned that preparation was not yet optimal; especially in cases where

facilitators/trainers also had other jobs and furthermore have responsibilities in their own office.

All facilitators (100 %) indicated that coordination and communication were conducted properly.

In preparing the implementation of Field Officer Training at least 4 preparation meetings

were held between facilitators and with the Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Agency of Banten

Province, namely:

a. Coordination meeting, discussing the division of tasks for each facilitator to simplify training

materials for field staff,

b. Coordination meetings with the Committee of Province-level to discuss the preparation of

the implementation of the field staff training including logistics, accommodation and

participants for the field staff training

c. Meeting related to the practical lessons on necropcy , blood sampling and swab,

vaccination; to discuss the presentation and the suggestions of the trainers

d. Coordination Meeting to discuss socialization practice to determine location in the village

for the field staff training participants, along with Dinas Kabupaten, Sub district officers and

the relevant government officials from district and village.

Related to the preparation of Field Staff Training, the facilitators mentioned that coordination

and communication was usually done through the regular meetings, by SMS or telephone.

Besides communication and coordination other issues affecting the preparation included;

a. Not everything what was planned could be implemented;

b. Other duties affected the time available for preparation;

c. Trainers were not only in charge of preparing the content of the training programme but also

responsible for the logistical preparations;

To improve preparations for the next courses the following is recommended:

a. Have a coordinating meeting organized by the provincial Dinas Peternakan, facilitators and

the consultant on monitoring and evaluation. This preliminary meeting is needed to

evaluate preparation of training schedule and training materials and make the necessary

adjustments based on the results of the meeting.

b. Training courses should not be conducted simultaneously in all 4 groups at the same time

to enable the consultant to monitor more effectively.

21

3.2.2. Evaluation of Field Staff Training Implement ation

Evaluation of field staff training was implemented through: 1) direct observation by

monitoring consultant and 2) collection of data by facilitators and monitoring consultant using

questionnaire. Evaluation of training was conducted to decide on adjustments in the training

programme, to estimate the effect of the study process (learning level) and the appreciation of

the participants for the course (reaction level).

3.2.2.1. Time and Location

District or City Field Staff Training on HPAI Prevention and Control were conducted on

August, 1 -5, 2009 and August, 6 – 10, 2009 in 2 different Hotels for 4 group of trainers so two

group of trainers conduct the Field Staff Training at the same time:

Date : Agust,1th - 5th ,2008 (Saturday to Wednesday)

Time : 08.00 WIB-17.00 WIB

Place : Group B: Wisata Baru Hotel, Jl. Maulana Yusuf No. 16, SERANG – Banten

Group C: Mahadria Hotel, Jl. Ki Mas Jong No. 12 (Alun-alun Serang) SERANG – Banten

Date : Agust,6th - 10th ,2008 (Thursday to Monday)

Time : 08.00 WIB-17.00 WIB

Group A: Mahadria Hotel, Jl. Ki Mas Jong No. 12 (Alun-alun Serang) SERANG – Banten

Group D: Wisata Baru Hotel, Jl. Maulana Yusuf No. 16, SERANG – Banten

The trainings were held in hotels. In general the selected locations were of good

standard. The hotels have a good classroom. Practical lessons were given inside the hotel near

the classroom.

3.2.2. Training Participants and Facilitator

Eighty (81) field staff from districts and municipalities of West Java participated in the

training, 20 for each course (Table 7). Detailed data of training participants are shown in

Appendix 2.

22

Table 7. Distribution of training participants according to districts or municipalities

No Group District/City Number of participants

1. Group A 1. Pandegelang District 2. Serang District 3. Lebak District 4. Tangerang District 5. Tangerang Selatan City 6. Tangerang City 7. Serang City 8. Cilegon City 9. Dinas Province

4 4 3 3 1 1 1 1 2

2. Group B 1. Pandegelang District 2. Serang District 3. Lebak District 4. Tangerang District 5. Tangerang Selatan City 6. Tangerang City 7. Serang City 8. Cilegon City 9. Dinas Province

6 3 4 3 1 1 1 1 -

3. Group C 1. Pandegelang District 2. Serang District 3. Lebak District 4. Tangerang District 5. Tangerang Selatan City 6. Tangerang City 7. Serang City 8. Cilegon City 9. Dinas Province

5 4 3 3 1 2 1 - 1

4. Group D 1. Pandegelang District 2. Serang District 3. Lebak District 4. Tangerang District 5. Tangerang Selatan City 6. Tangerang City 7. Serang City 8. Cilegon City 9. Dinas Province

3 3 4 3 1 2 1 2 2

Total 81 Participants

The participants from South Tangerang City originally planned to join the training in 2010

but fortunately they could already participate this year. Distribution of training participants in

each district/cities was not entirely according to the original plan.

23

3.2.2.1 Training Participant Age

Training participant age were various from 20 - 58 years old. Distribution of training

participant according to age was shown at Table 8.

Table 8. Distribution of Field Staff Training’s participants according to age

Group A Group B Group C Group D Total Age rate

(years old)

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

21 – 25 2 10 0 0 2 10 2 9.52 6 7.41

26 – 30 2 10 2 10 4 20 3 14.29 11 13.58

31 – 35 4 20 2 10 2 10 7 33.33 15 18.52

36 – 40 1 5 5 25 2 10 1 4.76 9 11.11

41 – 45 5 25 3 15 5 25 6 28.57 19 23.46

46 – 50 4 20 4 20 3 15 1 4.76 12 14.81

>50 2 10 4 20 2 10 1 4.76 9 11.11

Total 20 100 20 100 20 100 21 100 81 100

Range 20-56 27-56 23-52 23-53 20-58

3.2.2.2 Training Participant Education

The training for field staff was attended by 81 participants consisting of 67 males (83 %)

and 14 females (17 %). Formal education of participants included Junior High School, Senior

High School, Diploma degree and Bachelor degree, Veterinarian and Master degree. In general

the formal education of participants was good: 2 participants (2.47 %) have master degree

education, 1 participant (1.23 %) have veterinarian education, 34 participants (41,98 %) have

bachelor degree education; 18 participants (22.22%) diploma degree education; 23 participants

(28.40%) Senior High school education and 3 participants (3.70 %) have Junior High school

education. Distribution of training participant according to share of male/female and formal

education is shown in Table 9 and Table 10.

24

Table 9. Share of male/female participant in Field Staff Training

Sex Total No

Group Male % Female % No %

1 A 16 80 4 20 20 100

2 B 17 85 3 15 20 100

3 C 17 85 3 15 20 100

4 D 17 81 4 19 21 100

Total 67 83 14 17 81 100

Table 10. Distribution of field staff training participant according to formal education

Group A Group B Group C Group D Total Formal education

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

Junior High school/SLTP 2 10 1 5 0 0 0 0.00 3 3.70 Senior High school/ SLTA 8 40 7 35 4 20 4 19.05 23 28.40 Diploma degree 6 30 3 15 6 30 3 14.29 18 22.22 Bachelor degree 4 20 9 45 9 45 12 57.14 34 41.98 Veterinarian

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4.76 1 1.23 Master Degree 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 4.76 2 2.47

Total 20 100 20 100 20 100 21 100 81 100

Of the 18 participants who have bachelor degree education, 4 (22.22 %) have a diploma

in Animal Husbandry, 3 (16.67%) have a diploma in Extension, 4 (22.22 %) have a diploma in

Agriculture, 1 (5.56 %), 1 (5.56 %) have a diploma in Poultry Production, 1 (5.56 %) have a

diploma in Food Hygiene, and 2 (11.12 %) have a diploma in Medis Veterinary.

3.2.2.3 Training Facilitator for Field taff Trainin g

Trainers were 12 veterinarians who followed the Training of Trainers course on HPAI

Prevention and Control. Trainers / facilitators come from 4 districts ( Pandeglang district, Lebak

25

district, Serang district, and Tangerang district), 3 city (Tangerang city, Cilegon city and Serang

city) and Livestock Services of Banten province (See Table 11).

Table 11. Training Facilitatorsfor Field Staff Training

Training Group Facilitator Origin of area

1. Drh. Indardi Banten Province

2. Drh. Meliyana Tangerang District

Group A

3. Drh. Wina Listiana Tangerang City

1. Drh. Endang Setyowati Banten Province

2. Drh. Achmad Bachtiar Rivai Pandegelang Districts

Group B

3. Drh. Hanik Malichatin Lebak District

1. Drh. Ratna Suryaningrum Serang City

2. Drh. Rina Firmanillah Usman Serang District

Group C

3. Drh. Intan Sulistyowati Banten Province

1. Drh. Novia Herwandi Banten Province

2. Drh. Hanik Malichatin Lebak District

Group D

3. Drh. Dina Safitri TCilegon City

Total 12 facilitators

During the implementation of field staff training, one of facilitators (Drh. Rina Herviana)

was not able perform her duty because she got sick. She was replaced in the training course by

Drh. Hanik Malichatin.

3.2.3. Appreciation for the Training,

This part of the evaluation intends to measure the level of appreciation of the participants

for the training. Appreciation for the training relates to the topics, and the facilities. Data were

collected through direct observations and questionnaires.

3.2.3.1 Training Topics

The topics included in the programme originate from the programme developed during the

Training of Trainers course. Topics were divided in 5 groups (see Table 12).

In general, facilitators explained the topics properly, although based on observations and

evaluation several issues should be given attention:

26

a. Content of the lectures should be simplified (re-packaged more to the level of understanding

and experience of the participants); it is suggested to include more discussion in the training

sessions.

b. Facilitators should improve the lectures on: Immunology and vaccination; HPAI diagnosis

and Epidemiology; and Surveillance;

c. Adjustment of the time schedule is necessary to ensure that the preparation of socialization

is put forward in the programme. This enables participants to practice the socialization

presentation in the classroom before conducting it in the field.

Table 12. Group and Topic in Field Staff Training

No. Group Topic Trainer

1 Policy on HPAI 1. Policy on prevention and control of HPAI Livestock Services Agency Banten Province

2 Avian Influenza 1. Introduction of poultry diseases 2. AI and epidemiology 3. Biosecurity and biosafety 4. Immunology and vaccination 5. Surveillance and report system 6. Handling, labelling and sample

transportation

Facilitator

3. Communication 1. Communication and socialization 2. Communication media

Facilitator

4. Practices for

Socialization

1. Develop media for socialization 2. Socialization in the community 3. Vaccination technique 4. Necropsy, swab cloaca and trachea

Facilitator

5. Vaccination Vaccination in the community Facilitator

3.2.3.2 Training Facilities

In general the training facilities were of good standard. The Dinas Peternakan dan

Perikanan Province only decided to use 2 (two) hotels for the implementation of 4 training

courses. The hotels selected for these training have good facilities, in terms of bed rooms, class

room and meals.

3.2.4. Learning Level

This part of the evaluation discusses the effect of the training on the knowledge level of

the participants. The effect is measured in terms of knowledge improvement, changes in

27

behaviour and skills learned. Information and data were obtained through conducting a written

test at the beginning of the course and repeating the test at the end. By comparing the test

results we get an indication of the knowledge improvement from participants before and after

the training. Average of pre-test and post-test result of the training in each Group is shown in

Table 13. Based on table 13, the average of pre-test for 4 courses was 65,77 and the average

of post-test was 85,95. Group D scores very high in the pre-test (76,5) and group A scores very

high in the post-test (89,25).

Table 13. Average score of pre-test and post-test in Group A-D

No. Group Pre-Test Post-Test

1. Group A 65,5 89,25

2. Group B 65,7 82,5

3. Group C 55,4 80,05

4. Group D 76,5 92,0

Average 65,77 85,95

3.2.5. Socialization activity

During the training course the participants prepare, practice and conduct a socialization

programme on Avian Influenza, Biosecurity and Vaccination. The socialization practice was

conducted in the village and implemented in 2 (two) location, at Serang District and Serang City.

For the periode of August 1 to August 5, 2009, the socialization practice conducted in Dalung

Village, Serang City (Group B) and in Padasuka Village, Baros Sub-District, Serang District

(Group C). In one group, the facilitators devided the participants into 3 sub group and each sub-

group doing the socialization in different location. Because one sub group consist only 6 or 7

participants so more participants have change to practice the socialization activities in the

village. For the period of August 6 to August 10, 2009 the socialization practice conducted in

Cipete Village, Serang City (Group A) and in Sukacai Village, Baros Sub-District, Serang District

(Group D.

The background of the target audience is very divers on age, occupation and status. Age

of socialization participants range from 19-65 years old and consist of the vaccinator cadre,

housewives and villages officers.

28

Based on the observations of the socialization programme the following 2 suggestions

are made: (1) participants should practice in the classroom before conducting the session in the

village, this is needed because of the varied background of the participants in education and

knowledge of animal health.; and (2) adjust the training schedule and put the topics necessary

for the socialization (communication, socialization, Avian Influenza, biosecurity and vaccination)

earlier in the programme to allow for more practice time in the classroom;

Preparations which are essential for the before conducting a socialization programme:

• Choice of area within the village, which RW;

• Ensure commitment of RW and RTs of the area, and who will be present during socialization

campaign

• Select location of the socialization which sitting capacity, easily accessible for community,

lay-out room for good presentation, e.g. extra facilities needed

• Select most suitable time for socialization, beginning and end to ensure that socialization will

be attended by maximum attendance

• Make an estimate of the number of people that are expected to attend the socialization

• Determine steps on how the socialization and the vaccination are announced (e.g. posters

at RW and RT, but also at the shops; repeated announcements from the mosque; spread

the news a few days before actual socialization and vaccination campaign, separate

approach to people owning many poultry), during socialization and vaccination repeated

calls from the mosques

3.3. The Refresher Course

The training courses for field staff (Phase 1) at Banten Province was followed by a 2 day

refresher course for the facilitators to share experiences and update the programme for the next

series of training courses for the field staff. The program of refresher course for facilitators has

been conducted in Hotel Sari Kuring, Jl. Raya Cilegon-Banten on 13 and 14 October 2009.

The implementation of the refresher course for the facilitators followed by 12 Veterinarians

who joined the Training of Trainers course on HPAI Prevention and Control. Training

Facilitators were 3 (three) experts, namely Teun Pabri, DVM, Herman Patrick, DVM and DR.

Widiyanto Dwi Surya, MSc. Besides these three experts, also several trainers invited to present

and discuss several topics, namely Drh. Sri Mudjiharti, Ir. H. Agus M, and Drh. Sanusi. Details

programme for the refresher course can be seen in Table 14.

29

Table 14. Programme of the refresher course for the facilitators at Banten Province

No Programs Facilitator Tuesday, 13 October 2009 (First day)

1. Field Staff Training Program Evaluation by Facilitator : Report and Discussion-Group A and B

Facilitator team

2. Field Staff Training Program Evaluation by Facilitator : Report and Discussion-Group C and D

Facilitator team

3. Program Evaluation by Expert Dr. Widiyanto D. Surya, MSc 4. Avian Influenza Up date Teun Fabri 5 Banten Policy Update Ir. Agus Tauchid 6. Presentation: Immunology and Vaccination Group A-Facilitators 7. Refresher: Immunology and Vaccination Teun Fabri 8. Presentation: Immunology and Vaccination Patrick Herman 9. Presentation: Communication and Learning

Process in the Field Condition Group B - Facilitators

10. Field Staff Program Evaluation and ActionPlan

Dr. Widiyanto D. Surya, MSc

Wednesday, 14 October 2009 (Second day)

11. Presentation: Beosecurity Group C - Facilitators 12. Presentation: Sampling Technique and

Transport Group D - Facilitators

13. Refresher and Discussion: Biosecurity Sector 3 and 4

Teun Fabri/ Patrick H

14. Presentation Mycoplasma gallisepticum for poultry

Patrick Herman

15. Re-package Course on Mycoplasma gallisepticum

Teun Fabri/Patrick/Widi and participants

16. Finalisation of Action Plan for Facilitator and Field Staff

Arend Jan Nell/ / Dr. Widiyanto DS

Refresher Course started with reports from each group of facilitators and continued with

discussions and sharing experience. This was followed by the evaluation report from the

monitoring and evaluation consultant. During the refresher course some new topics were

introduced and knowledge on selected other topics updated. Adjustments of the training

programme were also discussed during the refresher course.

30

3.4. The visiting and monitoring activity by consul tant

During the field staff training courses the monitoring consultant discussed with the

participants how they expected to use knowledge and skills they had learned.

Some expectations of participants were:

1. Participants have the knowledge of HPAI Prevention and control;

2. Participants have knowledge about the transmission of HPAI from animals to humans

3. Participants have knowledge about the risks of HPAI for humans and animals

4. Participants can implement HPAI Prevention and control programmes in the community

5. Participants can share experiences with other participants

During the visits of the consultant some problems in training were grouped and

discussed. The evaluation is used to solve these problems and to improve the quality of next

training. The problem identified during the training and the solutions recommended are listed in

table 15.

Table 15. Problem Inventory and Solution on Field Staff Training

No Problem Answer to solve Action

1. Selection of the participants by livestock services agency Background of participants

Clear information from DINAS province. Requirements, criteria for selection in a letter. Timing of the letter (> 2 weeks) Biodata, incl. job description and education level, available; to be sent to Facilitator

DINAS province and follow up by DINAS district and trainer Facilitators

2. Knowledge level

Minimum education level SMP (junior high school).

3. Difference in knowledge level

• Use entry test to form groups. • Introduction discussion to share

knowledge level and expectation. • Questioning • Ask questions and share experience

Preparation of facilitators and action during the programme.

4. Adapt the content of the presentation to participants level

• Use the repackage information from TOT.

• Exchange and rehearse presentations

• Adapt after every course

Facilitators and time reservation

5. Location • Minimum requirements are known. Inventory if no suitable location can be found contact DINAS

31

No Problem Answer to solve Action

6. Organisation committee (number of people, tasks, responsibility)

1 officer present every day (solve with DINAS if you need more)

7. Quality socialisation material

Not enough demonstration models Material from CBAIC, contact KOMNAS, CMU own material (TOT),

The visiting schedule of the evaluation and monitoring expert of field staff training in

Banten Province is shown in table 16.

Table 16: The schedule of visiting of evaluation and monitoring consultant of the field staff training on HPAI prevention and control

No.

Date of Training (2009)

Group

Location of training

Schedule of Visited

1 01 August up to 5 August B Wisata Baru Hotel, Serang 2 and 3 August

2 01 August up to 5 August C Mahadria Hotel, Serang 2 and 3 August

3 06 August up to 10 August A Mahadria Hotel, Serang 8 August

4 06 August up to 10 August, D Wisata Baru Hotel, Serang 8 August

3.5. Action Plan

During the training the participants were requested to make an action plan related to

HPAI prevention and control. The activities must be presented in the action made by each

participant as shown in Table 17. And the examples of action plan made by the participants are

shown in Appendix 5.

Table 17 Action plans of participants related to HPAI prevention and control activity

No Plan Time Action Purpose

1. Coordination with local livestock services agency

Max. 1 week after training

Make a report of Field Staff Training to local livestock services agency

Socialization the result of training

2. Socialization the result of training to other field staff

2nd week

Socialization through routine training activity is conducted by local livestock agency

To improve knowledge, skill and behaviour of field staff of local livestock services

3. Coordinate with related agency/office

3rd week

Coordinate with local health agency

such as: socialization AI to society.

32

No Plan Time Action Purpose

4. Coordinate with sub district and village officers

3rd week

Coordination will be conducted in meeting coordination in sub district and village

Socialization the result of training and arrange the schedule of HPAI Prevention and control activity,

5. Socialization the result of training to community villages

4th week

Socialization to group discussion or small group in sub-district or villages

Spreading the information to other communities in sub district or village

• Arrange the routine schedule for socialization

of AI (every 2 months)

to prevent and control of AI in sub district or villages

6. Routine Implementation of socialization and vaccination of AI

5th week

• Approach to subdistrict chief, head of RTs, head of RWs and people owning many poultry.

• Announce the news a few days before actual socialization, through posters at RWs and RTs, at the shops; the mosque

In order that society who following socialization activity reach goals that have been expected

7. Routine evaluation of socialization AI

• Conduct coordination meeting with subdistrict chief, head of RTs, head of RWs and personage of community in sub district and village

Evaluate the impact of socialization AI related with HPAI prevention and control program

33

CHAPTER IV

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1. Conclusion

In general, the courses for field staff have been conducted properly and the goals of

training have been achieved. Criteria in the evaluation were the improvements in knowledge

and skills related to HPAI prevention and control. After having followed the training, participants

are able to plan and to conduct socialization programmes and AI vaccination although there are

still some weaknesses which require attention and need to be corrected.

4.2. Recommendations

1. It is important to improve coordination and communication between facilitators and

participants after the training in one district or city to ensure proper implementation.

2. It is important to strengthen the role of local livestock services committee for preparing the

logistics of the field staff training to allow the facilitators to concentrate on preparation of

training materials.

3. Good coordination and good communication with the village officer (Pamong desa) and

Head of RTs/RWs is important before socialization is conducted.

4. It is important to announce the schedule of socialization to community a few days prior to

socialization and vaccination is conducted.

Other recommendations arising from this report:

Preparation and conduction of socialization practice in the training:

1. Participants should practice in the classroom before conducting the session in the

village, this is needed because of the varied background of the participants in

education and knowledge of animal health;

2. Adjust the training schedule and put the topics necessary for the socialization

(communication, socialization, Avian Influenza, biosecurity and vaccination) earlier

in the programme to allow for more practice time in the classroom;

34

Suitability of the lectures for use in the fieldstaff training:

a. Content of the lectures should be simplified (re-packaged more to the level of

understanding and experience of the participants) especially for topic that need in-depth

comprehension like topic of immunology and vaccination; it is suggested to include more

discussion in the training sessions.

b. Facilitators should improve the lectures on: Immunology and vaccination; HPAI

diagnosis and Epidemiology; and Surveillance;

c. Adjustment of the time schedule is necessary to ensure that the preparation of

socialization is put forward in the programme. This enables participants to practice the

socialization presentation in the classroom before conducting it in the field.

Preparation of the training courses for field staff:

a. Have a coordinating meeting organized by the provincial Dinas Peternakan,

facilitators and the consultant on monitoring and evaluation. This preliminary

meeting is needed to evaluate preparation of training schedule and training

materials and make the necessary adjustments based on the results of the

meeting.

b. Training courses should not be conducted simultaneously in all 4 groups at the

same time to enable the consultant to monitor more effectively.

35

CHAPTER V

CLOSING

This report is made to be used as reference to improve the next training activities of

District or City Field Staff Training on HPAI Prevention and Control. This report also can be

used by Livestock Services Agency of Banten Province and Wageningen International to make

adjustment for correction in the next training.

36

Appendix 1. Terms of Reference for the Monitorin g and Evaluation Assignment for the District/City Field Staff Trainin g on HPAI Prevention and Control

27 May 2008

For Drh Widiyanto Surya for a monitoring and evaluation assignment during the

implementation of the ‘Training for district and City field technicians on HPAI control and

prevention’. The training courses are being implemented by Livestock services agency West

Java with support from Indonesia – Netherlands Partnership Project on HPAI Prevention and

Control. Proposal for the training is attached together with the proposed programme.

The Terms of Reference is for the first four courses which are to be implemented in June

2008 prior to the refresher course on 2 and 3 July. A new ToR will be prepared for the six

courses which will be implemented in August – October 2008.

Drh Widiyanto will join each of the courses for at least one day for a monitoring and evaluation

visit to:

- Identify the successes and constraints in the implementation of the courses (what is going

well and what is difficult);

- Comment on the realization of the training compared to the targets and the programme set in

the proposal;

- Discuss with the trainers and the participants the usefulness of the training programme and

how the trainees could become actively involved in HPAI control and surveillance

programmes;

- Comment on the programme as it is implemented at present;

- Make recommendations for issues which will need special attention during the refresher

course (e.g.: adjustments in the programme; extra training required for the trainers; etc)

- Make recommendations for a follow-up programme (in relation to HPAI) for the work of the

field staff;

- Design an evaluation form for the training courses for the field staff, giving special attention to

the effectiveness of the training programme;

- Prepare a report for Livestock services agency West Java and Wageningen International and

give a short presentation of your findings at the start of the refresher course;

37

Appendix 2. Detail data of the Field Staff Training Participant

Appendix 2-1. Detail data of the Field Staff Traini ng Participant in Group B

Group B (Tangerang district, Serang district, Pandegelang district, Lebak District, Tagerang City, Tangerang Selatan City, Serang City and Cilegon City)

1st course – 1 up to 5 August, 2009

No Name Place and date of birth

Origin Instance Position

Last Education

1. Muhaeminah, AMd

Pandegalang,15 April 1984 (25 years old) – F

Livestock & Animal Health services, Kab.Pandegelang

Contract staff, Dept.of Agric

Diploma on Animal Husbandry

2. M. Bahron Pandegalang,1 January 1962 (47 years old) – M


Field Staff/ Paramedis

Senior high School

3. Sunar Jaya Pandegalang, 3 June 1958 (31 years old) – M


Field Staff/ Paramedis

Junior high School

4. Endang Sutisna

Sumedang, 18 January 1963 (46 years old) - M


Field Staff Senior high school

5. Yayat Sumirat, AMd

Lebak, 20 May 1966 (43 years old) – M

Agriculture Services, Kab. Serang

Field Staff / Extension Worker

Duploma on Extension

6. R o u p Serang, 16 November 1989 (20 years old) - M



7. Suherman,AMd Ciamis, 12 September 1961 (48years old) – M


Field Staff/ Extension Worker

Bachelor on Extension

8. Aca Juarsa, AMd

Lebak, 9 June 1964 (45 years old) – M


Field Staff Diploma on Agriculture

9. Yeni Marlina, Amd

Ciamis, 16 March 1978 (31 years old) – F

Livestock services, Kab. Lebak

Field staff, UPTD Kec.Sajira

Diploma on Poultry Prod.

10. Yani Sri Wahyuni,

Ciamis, 20 September 1972 (37 years old) – F


Field staff, of Dinas

Senior high school

11 Yanto Susanto Ciamis, 8 August 1955 (54 years old) –M



12 S u h a i d i Tangerang, 14 March 1964 (45 years old) - M

Agriculture & Livestock Service, Kab.Tangerang

Technical staff, of Dinas

Senior high school

13 A. Jamaludin Bogor, 28 September 1966 (43 years old) - M


Field staff, UPTD Kec.Tiga Raksa

Junior High school

14. Isep Najudin Bandung, 6 July 1967 (42years old) – M


Field staff, UPTD Kec.Kelapa Dua

Bachelor on An.Husbandry (Open.Univ)

15. Sudirman Garut, 12 February 1953 (56 years old) - M

Agric.& Fishery Serv. Kota Tang- Selatan


Senior high school

38



Last Education

16 M. Tohirudin Tangerang, 17 June 1973 (31 years old) - M

Livestock Service, Kota Tangerang


Senior High school

17 D a t a m, SPKP

Brebes, 12 November 1962 (47 years old) - M

Agriculture Service Kota Serang

Field staff of Kec.Kasemen


18 Kokom Ko-malasari,STp

Pandegelang, 4 Nov 1962 (27 years old) – F

Agric.& Fishery Serv., Kota Cilegon


Bachelor on Agric.Tech.

19 Rohmatullah Fatwa,Amd

Serang, 27 September 1976 (33 years old) - M

Balai P3KH, Dinas Prov.Banten

Technical Staff Diploma on An.Husbandry

20 Chandra Yudha,AMd

Lampung, 15 April 1981 (28 years old) - M

Dinas Livestock & Fishery Service, Prov.Banten

Staff Diploma on An.Health

39

Appendix 2-2. Detail data of the Field Staff Traini ng Participant in Group C

Group C (Tangerang district, Serang district, Pandegelang district, Lebak District, Tagerang City, Tangerang Selatan City, Serang City and Cilegon City)

1st course – 1 up to 5 August, 2009 No Name Place and date of birth Origin Instance Position

Last

Education 1. Koesnarya Bandung,17 March

1957 (52 years old) – M Livestock & Animal Health services, Kab.Pandegelang

Field staff, UPTD Wil IV

Senior high School

2. Budy Heryana,SE

Pandegalang,8 June 1978 (31 years old) – M


Staff Dinas

Bachelor on Economics

3. Priatna Lebak, 14 June 1955 (54 years old) – M


Technical Staff For Poskeswan

Junior high School

4. A. Mulyana Pandegelang, 25 May 1958 (51 years old) – M


Technical Staff for Keswan

Senior high school

5. Luton Mustofa

Banten, 10 December 1959 (50 years old) – M


Technical Staff for Dinas

Diploma on Extension

6. O n a h, STp Majalengka, 12 February 1969 (40 years old) – F


Field Staff, UPTD/Kec

Bachelor on Agriculture

7. H.Sadjum R Karsono,SP

Ciamis, 2 June 1953 (46years old) – M

UPT BPP Pulo Ampel, Kab. Serang


Bachelor on Agronomy

8. Herlan, SPKP

Ciamis, 27 December 1959 (40 years old) – M


Field Staff , Head of PTD

Bachelor on Agric.Extension

9. Panji, SP Baros, 13 May 1972 (37 years old) – M


Field staff, Extension Worker

Bachelor on Agribusiness.

10. Rukman, AMd

Lebak, 3 April 1965 (44 years old) – M


Field staff, of UPTD Kec.

Diploma on Extension

11 Kasbi Edi Suryadi

Ciamis, 5 September 1953 (56 years old) –M


Field Staff of UPTD Kec.

Senior high school

12 Sumarno Lebak, 16 August 1982 (27 years old) – M


Field Stafff, of Dinas

Senior high school

13 Jamaluddin ZA, SPt

Aemual, 4 April 1976 (33 years old) – M


Field staff, UPTD Wil III

Bachelor on An.Husbandryl

14. Ateng Suwadi

Tangrang, 5 June 1963 (46 years old) – M

Agric. & Livestock Serv, Kab.Tangerang

Field staff, UPTD

Senior high school

15. Jaah Sajaah Garut, 15 December 1969 (40 years old) – F


Field Staff/ UPTD Sepatan

Senior high school

16 Pitri Yono, SE

Tangerang, 16 December 1969 (40 years old) – M


Field Staff, of Dinas

Bachelor on Management

17 Ahmad Daropi

Tangerang, 12 January 1966 (43 years old) – M


Field staff of Dinas

Senior high school

40

No Name Place and date of birth Origin Instance Position

Last Education

18 Moh.Noor HN,SSos

Tangerang, 4 October 1966 (43 years old) – M


Field Staff of AI Satgas FB

Bachelor on Admin.

19 Mulyana, AMd

Majalengka, 19 July 1960 (49 years old) – M


Head of Admin Sec. of Dinas


20 Mutia Agustina, AMd

Rangkasbitung, 24 August 1981 (28 years old) – F



Diploma on Food Higiene

41

Appendix 2-3. Detail data of the Field Staff Traini ng Participant in Group D

Group D (Tangerang district, Serang district, Pandegelang district, Lebak District, Tagerang City, Tangerang Selatan City, Serang City and Cilegon City)

1st course – 6 up to 10 August, 2009 No Name Place and date of

birth Origin Instance Position

Last

Education 1. Aep Saefu-

rochman,AMd Pandegalang, 2 April1981 (28 years old) – M


Technical Staff of Dinas

Diploma on Animal Husbandry

2. TB.Aakhmad Juwaeni,S,Sos

Pandegalang,1 June 1969 (40 years old) – M


Admini. Staff of Dinas

Bachelor on Admin.

3. Irvan Ginanjar Natakusumah,S.Kom

Cimahi, 24 September 1984 (25 years old) - M



Bachelor on Information System

4. Hanifah C Tataningrum, SPt

Klaten, 12 May 80 (29 years old) – F



Bachelor on An. Husbandry

5. Iin Agus-tinawati, SSos

Pandegelang 16 August 1966 (43 years old) – F


Staff of Dinas Bachelon on Administration

6. Bambang Her-manto,SPKP

Majalengka,20 January 1958 (51 years old) – M


Head of UPTD Kec.Kibin


7. Baedowi, SP Serang, 27 April 1961 (48years old) – M


Head of UPTD Kec.Tanara


8. Dodi Rocha-yadi, SPKP

Sumedang, 10 February 1957 (52 years old) - M


Head of UPTD Kec.Cirande


9. Edi Sadiana, AMd.PP

Tasik, 8 December 1959 (50 years old) – M


Ext.Worker of Forestry

Diploma on Agriculture

10. Usep Deni Iskandar Garut, 04 January 1976 (33 years old) – M


Field staff, of Dinas

Senior High school

11 Iwan Herma wansah, SE

Lebak, 1 September 1980 (29 years old) –M


Field Staff Bachelor on Economics

12 Achmad Sulaeman,S.St

Purwakarta,19 Feb 1963 (46 years old) – M


Head of UPTD Wil. I (5 Kec.)


13 D u l h a k Tangerang, 12 October 1970 (39 years old) – M

Agric.& Livestock Serv, Kab.Tangerang

Field staff,

Senior High school

14. S u h a r i Tangerang, 7 July 1965 (44 years old) – M


Field staff UPTD Sukamulya

Senior High school

15. Suherman Garut, 18 July 1965 (44 years old) - M


Field Staff UPTD Kec. Balaraja

Senior high school

16 Suherman Ciamis, 5 September 1954 (45 years old) - M




42



Last Education

17 Arief Rukmana,AMd Bogor, 24 October 1986 (23 years old) – M


Field staff UPTD Kec.Pinang

Diploma on Medis.Vet.

18 Rangga Wirianto,AMd

Bogor, 17 September 1983 (27 years old) – M


Field staff,

Diploma on Medis.Vet.

19 Jaelani M Hidayat,SP,MM

Cianjur, 3 December 1962 (47 years old) – M


Head of UPTD Kec. Serang

Magister Management

20 Shri Laksmi W, AMd Tangerang, 7 October 1975 (34 years old) – F


Staff Diploma on An.Husbandry

43

Appendix 2-4. Detail data of the Field Staff Traini ng Participant in Group A

Group A (Tangerang district, Serang district, Pandegelang district, Lebak District, Tagerang City, Tangerang Selatan City, Serang City and Cilegon City)

1st course – 6 up to 10 August, 2009 No Name Place and date of

birth Origin Instance Position

Last

Education 1. Arie Patrian-

syah,SPt.,MSi Pandegelang, 24 January 1979 (31years old)-M


Technical staff, For Ruminansia

Magister of Science

2. Aan Kusnandar, SSos

Pandegalang, 9 June 1978 (31years old)-M


Staff of General & HRD Section

Bachelor on Administration

3. Wadi Hatono Pandegalang, 3 January 1967 (42 years old) – M



Senior high School

4. Santio Tangerang, 8 May 1965 (44 years old) – M


Head of UPTD Kec. Cinangka


5. Wawan Fauzan,SP

Serang, 21 March 1966 (43 years old) – M


Field Staff Bachelor on Agriculture

6. Syobani, SP Serang, 15 October 1963 (46 years old) – M


Field Staff (Ext.Worker)


7. Yayan Hardian-syah,SH

Garut, 16 October 1976 (34 years old) – M


Staff for Admin. UPTD Wil. VI

Bachelor on An. Husbandry

8. Nurhaedin Lebak, 10 March 1979 (30 years old) – M


Field Staff Senior High school

9. Iqin Zaeny Mansyur, SPt

Lebak, 14 April 1978 (31 years old) – M


Field staff, UPTD Kec.Bayah

Bachelor on Animal Prod.

10. Satria Erpan, SPt

Muara Keling, 3 Nopem ber 77 (32 years old)-M


Field staff UPTD Kec. Cilograng

Bachelor on Animal Prod

11 Dedi Supriadi,S.PKP

Tangerang, 8 May 1966 (44 years old) –M

Agric. & Livestock Serv. Kab.Tangerang

Field Staff Bachelor on Animal Prod

12 Odih Nurhadi Tangerang, 9 March 1967 (42 years old) – M



Senior high school

13 Supriatno Tangerang, 12 April 1968 (43 years old) – M


Field staff,

Senior High school

44



Last Education

14. Jeje Junaedi, AMd

MajaLengka, 14 Septeb 1956 (53years old) – M


Field staff (Ext.Worker)

Bachelor on An.Husbandry

15. Santy Sari Targana,STP

Tasik, 11 September 1980 (29 years old) – F


Field Staff UPTD Kec.Periuk

Bachelor on Agric.Tech.

16 Latipah, AMd Cirebon, 19 August 1984 (25 years old) – F


Field staff UPTD Kec.Cipondoh

Diploma on Fishery

17 Nani Suryani, SP

Karawang, 15 February 1969 (40 years old) – F


Head of Admin, UPTD Kec.Tatak


18 Muhamad Hamdi

Cilegon, 14 October 1976 (33 years old) – M




19 Drh.Nurhidayah Tangerang, 8 March 1981 (28 years old)- F



Veterinarian (DVM)

20 Anto Setiawan,AMd

Lampung, 12 April 1986 (23 years old) – M


Technical Staff

Diploma on Medis Vet.

21 Joni Fahamsyah,SP

Yogyakarta, 6 June 1978 (31 years old) – M


Technical Staff


45

Appendix 3: Identity of HPAI participant training f or Evaluation and Monitoring Lembar Monitoring Pelaksanaan Pelatihan Petugas Lapang Tahun 2009

Diisi oleh Peserta Pelatihan Petugas Lapang Group :

A. DATA DIRI-Personal Data

Nama Lengkap : ………………………………………………………….......... (Full Name with title)

Tempat dan Tgl Lahir : …………………………………………………………......... (Place and date of birth)

Jenis Kelamin/Sex : � Laki-laki/Male � Perempuan/Female

Alamat Rumah/ Home Address : ........................................................................................ ........................................................................................

No.Telephon : ................................ HP : . ........................................

Office/Institution : ......................................................................................

………………………………………………………………

Office Address : ……………………………………………………………..

......................................................................................

Phone .Office : .............................. Email:………....................................

B. DATA PENDIDIKAN DAN PEKERJAAN :

1. Formal Education : □ Junior High Schoolt □ Senior High School

□ Academy/Diploma □ University/S1 □ Master

If you are graduted fromthe University, please indicate:

Study Programm : ………...................................................................................

Faculty : .............................................................................................

2. What is your primary job and your present position ? : ...……………………………………….

.................................................................................................................................

When you are in this position? : ……………………………………

46

Jelaskan tugas Saudara secara singkat (pada posisi tersebut) :

……......................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................

……………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………..

C. DATA TERKAIT DENGAN PELATIHAN

1. Sebutkan Pelatihan yang pernah saudara ikuti sebeluumnya dan kapan?:

1. ...........................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................

2. ......................................................................................................................................

………………………………………………………………………………………………….

3. ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

…………………………………………………………………………………………………..

2. Berapa lama pengalaman Saudara sebagai petugas lapang : …………………………........

3. Apakah Saudara pernah mengikuti pelatihan terkait Avian Influenza? ……………………..

Kalau pernah, jelaskan : ………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

4. Apakah alasan Saudara mengikuti Pelatihan ini? ..............................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

47

5. Apakah harapan atau rencana Saudara setelah selesai mengikuti Pelatihan ini ?

............................................................................................................................................

…………...............................................................................................................................

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Tanggal : .........................................

Terima Kasih atas Kerjasamanya – Tim Monitoring : Dr.Drh.H.Widiyanto Dwi Surya, MSc

48

Appendix 4. Questionnaire for Trainers of Monitorin g and evaluation Related to the Preparation and implementation of Field Staff Train ing for HPAI Prevention and Control in Banten Province

Group : Group A – B – C - D

Name of Facilitator : 1.

2

3.

Date of Training :

Venue of Training

Address :

Number of Participants : ______ Male ______ Female

District/city origin : _______ person from District :

_______ person from District:

_______ person from District :



_______ person from City:

_______ person from City :

Signature of Facilitator : _____________________________________________

Full Name : _____________________________________________

Date of Monev : _____________________________________________

49

A. Preparation of Field Staff Training, 2009

1. Jelaskan Persiapan apa saja yang dilakukan sebelum pelaksanaan Pelatihan Petugas

Lapang kali ini ?

Jelaskan :

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

..………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

..………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

2. Apakah hambatan yang masih dijumpai dalam persiapan dan pelaksanaan Pelatihan

Petugas Lapang kali ini ? (Please tell the obstacles which related with preparation and

implementation, for example: time, topics, coordination, facilitators, etc)

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

..………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

.………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

50

3. Apakah saran-saran anda untuk meningkatkan kualitas Pelatihan Petugas lapang

berikutnya?

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

..………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

..………………………………………………………………………………....................................

B. Implementation of Field Staff Training

1. How about cooperation of facilitator or trainer team in your Group?

1. Good

2. Enough

3. Bad

Please explain the reason

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

..………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

3. On which training topics did you feel confident enough to conduct: ( Topik apa saja yang

anda merasa sangat yakin/percaya diri untuk menyamnpaikan dan mendiskusikannya?)

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

.………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

51

4. On which training topics did you not feel confident enough to conduct: ( Topik apa saja

yang anda masih merasa TIDAK yakin/tidak percaya diri untuk menyamnpaikan dan

mendiskusikannya?)

………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

..………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

…………………………………………………………………………………....................................

……………………………………………………………………………...........................................

................................…..……………………………………………………………………………….

5. Are you sure that this training will benefit for field staff in their work on HPAI prevention and

control?

1. Sure 2. Not sure 3. Don’t know

Please tell the reason:

....................................................................................................................................................

....................................................................................................................................................

6. Modifikasi atau penyesuaian apa yang perlu dilakukan apabila dianggap perlu untuk

meningkatkan keberhasilan dan efek dari pelaksanaan Pelatihan Petugas Lapang

berikutnya? (please list the adjustments and explain your reason)

……………………………………………………………………………….............................................

.........................................................................................................................................................

.........................................................................................................................................................

...................... …………………………………………………………………………………..

.........................................................................................................................................................

.................................................................................................................................................

7. Topics apa saja yang masih anda butuhkan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan anda

sebagai fasilitator (dan atau sebagai Dokter Hewan? Sebutkan

52

Topik-topik yang terkait dengan Penyakit AI:

1.……………………………………………………………….........................................................

..

2.................................................................................................................................................

..

3................................................................................................................................................

4.…………………………………………………………………………………..

Topik terkait dengan penyakit Unggas yang lain (boleh tidak terkait dengan materi yg anda

berikan selama pelatihan):

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

Topik Lainnya (Komunikasi/Evaluasi/Kebijakan, dll)

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

8. Berikan komentar saudara tentang kegiatan Pelatihan ini ?

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................

Thank you for your cooperation

53

Appendix 5. Examples of action plans as prepared by individual participant

Name: Drh. Nur Hidayah District/Municipality: Cilegon City, Banten Province

No and Date

Action Plan Target Persons in charge and involved

Constraint in action that might be faced

1 11-08-09

Reporting of training activity result to Head of Dinas, and Head of Sub.Div.(Dinas Pertanian dan Perikanan, Kota Cilegon)

Report to Dinas the result and next program after joint the field staff training

Field Staff, Head of Dinas, Head of Division

-

2

12-08-09

Coordinate with others Field staff and Head of UPTD: ▪ Decided the 6 locations for socialization ▪ Decided the target audience (Group of farmer, PKK/mothers’s group amd group of Religion) ▪ Decided the date for socialization

There are agreement about the location, target and time for the socialization → Schedule approved

Field staff, Head of UPTD, Head of the Village, Chairman of Mother’s group, Farmer,s group and Religious group

-

3 13-08-09

Report to Camat (Head of Sub district) about the program and schedule

Ask the support and the local authority will give a good support

Head of Village, Dinas or UPTD, Field Staff

- Less response from community in urban area

5

19 to 24-08-09

Prepare the message (materi) and media will use during the socialization

Field Staff with the supervising by Facilitator

Field Staff, PDSR, Head of UPTD and Facilitator

- Operational - Equipment

25 to 30 August

09

The Implementation for the First Socialization activity

Group of Farmer (Native Chicken

- - Operational - Equipment etc)

October 09

The Implementation for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Socialization activities

Group of Farmer (Native Chicken Farmers; mother’s group, religious group)


Nopem-ber 09

The Implementation for the 5th and 6 Socialization activities

Group of Farmer (Native Chicken Farmers; mother’s group; religious group)


54

Name: Jamaluddin. ZA, Spt District: Lebak No Action Plan Action Time Target Constraint that

might be faced 1 Report to Dinas and

Coordinating with local UPTD, about HPAI training result

11 August 09 (The 2nd week of August 2009)

There will be coordination between Dinas and local UPTD, Livestock services

-

2 Prepare the assignment letter fot Field staff

11 up to 14 August 2009

More support for coordination and implementation of the activities

-

3 Coordinate with others Field staff, PDSR and Head of UPTD: ▪ Discuss the 6 locations for socialization ▪ Decided the detail target audience (Poultry farmer, PKK/mothers’s group and group of Religion) ▪ Decided the date for socialization

24 up to 30 August 2009 (the 4th week of August 2009)

To get the support and collaboration during preparation and implementation of the socialization

-

4 Survey location for the socialization

24 up to 30 August 2009 (the 4th week of August 2009

To know better information about the location and to collect information about the participants

- Time - Transportation

5

Prepare the message (materi) and media that will use during the socialization

2 up to 4 September (the 1st week of September 2009)

Before the preparation is needed to discuss with facilitator

- Operational - Equipment - Budget

6

Socialization about Prevention and Control of HPAI (farmer’s group)

The 1st week of September 2009

Community have

knowledge about HPAI

- Time - Budget - Equipment - Transportation

7

The Implementation for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Socialization activities

October 09 and Nopember 09

Group of Farmer (Native Chicken Farmers; mother’s group, religious group)


etc)

8 The Implementation for the 5th and 6 Socialization activities

December 09 Group of Farmer (Native Chicken Farmers; mother’s group; religious group)


etc)

9 Reporting of socialization result

The 4th week, of December 2009

Activity and target can be reached during the socialization

- Less equipment in UPTD (i.e. : computer, etc)

english version report on-tot-fs-bantenwds17jan 10 tot and... · 1 report on the implementation on...

Documents