environmental impacts of nuclear technologies bill menke, october 19, 2005

54
Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Post on 19-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Summary

1 radioactivity measurment

2 Neutron chain reactions

3 Environmental Issues

production

storage

use

disposal

Page 3: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

measurement

Page 4: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Radiation: energy-carrying particles (including light) spontaneously emitted by a radioactive atom

Page 5: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Measuring Radiation

• Assessing the radioactivity of a chunk of material. Activity: Count the number of disintegrations per second.

– Becquerel (Bq): Activity expressed in disintegrations per second. – Curie (Ci): (An old unit) Activity expressed in equivalent grams of Radium. 1 Becquerel =

2.7 x 10-11 Curies. • Assessing the amount of energy absorbed by a chunk of material.

– will depend upon both the number of particles and the energy carried by the particles emitted by the disintegrating atoms.

– Grays (Gy), Absorption of 1 joule (J) of radiation by 1 kg of material (for example, a human body).

– Rad (an old unit) 1 Gy = 100 rads • Assessing the ability of radiation to damage living tissue. Must account for the fact

that not all types of radiation are equally damaging. – X-rays and beta particles more penetrating and more damaging than alphas or neutrons. – Sievert (Sv) = Grays of X-rays and beta rays + 0.10 Grays of neutrons + 0.05 Grays of

alpha partcles. – Rem: (an old unit), 1 Sv = 100 rems.

Page 6: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

System International (SI) Units for Radiation

QuantityUnit Name(Symbol) Definition

FormerUnit

Conversion Factor

Activity Becqueral (Bq)Disintegrations/sec

Curie (Ci)1 Bq = 2.7 x 10-11 Ci

Absorbed Dose Gray (Gy) Joule/kilogram rad1 Gy = 100 rads

Dose Equivalent Sievert (Sv) Joule/kilogram rem1 Sv = 100 rems

Page 7: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Radioactivity of some natural and other materials

1 adult human (100 Bq/kg) 7000 Bq

1 kg of coffee 1000 Bq

1 kg superphosphate fertiliser 5000 Bq

The air in a 100 sq metre Australian home (radon) 3000 Bq

The air in many 100 sq metre European homes (radon) 30 000 Bq

1 household smoke detector (with americium) 30 000 Bq

Radioisotope for medical diagnosis 70 million Bq

Radioisotope source for medical therapy 100 000 000 million Bq

1 kg 50-year old vitrified high-level nuclear waste 10 000 000 million Bq

1 luminous Exit sign (1970s) 1 000 000 million Bq

1 kg uranium 25 million Bq

1 kg uranium ore (Canadian, 15%) 25 million Bq

1 kg uranium ore (Australian, 0.3%) 500 000 Bq

1 kg low level radioactive waste 1 million Bq

1 kg of coal ash 2000 Bq

1 kg of granite 1000 Bq

Page 8: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 9: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

10,000 mSv (10 sieverts) as a short-term and whole-body dose would cause immediate illness, such as nausea and decreased white blood cell count, and subsequent death within a few weeks.Between 2 and 10 sieverts in a short-term dose would cause severe radiation sickness with increasing likelihood that this would be fatal.

1,000 mSv (1 sievert) in a short term dose is about the threshold for causing immediate radiation sickness in a person of average physical attributes, but would be unlikely to cause death. Above 1000 mSv, severity of illness increases with dose.If doses greater than 1000 mSv occur over a long period they are less likely to have early health effects but they create a definite risk that cancer will develop many years later.

Above about 100 mSv, the probability of cancer (rather than the severity of illness) increases with dose. The estimated risk of fatal cancer is 5 of every 100 persons exposed to a dose of 1000 mSv (ie. if the normal incidence of fatal cancer were 25%, this dose would increase it to 30%).

50 mSv is, conservatively, the lowest dose at which there is any evidence of cancer being caused in adults. It is also the highest dose which is allowed by regulation in any one year of occupational exposure. Dose rates greater than 50 mSv/yr arise from natural background levels in several parts of the world but do not cause any discernible harm to local populations.

Page 10: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

20 mSv/yr averaged over 5 years is the limit for radiological personnel such as employees in the nuclear industry, uranium or mineral sands miners and hospital workers (who are all closely monitored).

10 mSv/yr is the maximum actual dose rate received by any Australian uranium miner.

3-5 mSv/yr is the typical dose rate (above background) received by uranium miners in Australia and Canada.

3 mSv/yr (approx) is the typical background radiation from natural sources in North America, including an average of almost 2 mSv/yr from radon in air.

2 mSv/yr (approx) is the typical background radiation from natural sources, including an average of 0.7 mSv/yr from radon in air. This is close to the minimum dose received by all humans anywhere on Earth.

0.3-0.6 mSv/yr is a typical range of dose rates from artificial sources of radiation, mostly medical.

0.05 mSv/yr, a very small fraction of natural background radiation, is the design target for maximum radiation at the perimeter fence of a nuclear electricity generating station. In practice the actual dose is less.

Page 11: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Neutron chain reactions

Page 12: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

fission of atomic nucleusby neutron bombardment

Page 13: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

one neutron in, three neutrons out

potential for using

those neutrons

to induce more fissions

Page 14: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Leo Szilard, 1898-1964

1934: patents ideaof neutron chainreaction

(British patent 440,023)

And nuclear reactor

(patent 630726)

Page 15: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

More and more neutronscause more and more fissions

Page 16: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 17: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 18: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 19: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 20: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 21: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 22: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 23: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

I generated these images withthe applet

lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/applist/chain/chain.htm

try it out!

Page 24: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 1

What isotopes of what elements exhibit induced fission and releasemore neutrons? Only a few:

U235 + n = Ba129 + Kr93 + 3n + Note = gamma rays

As well as Pu239, U233 and Th232

but only U235 and Pu239 commonly used

Page 25: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 2

Where do you get U235 and Pu239?

U235 occurs naturally, and is concentrated into ores by geological processes. But it must be separated from the much more abundant U238

by a process called gaseous diffusion separation).

Pu239 does not occur naturally, but can beManufactured by bombarding U238 with neutrons in a breeder reactor.

Page 26: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 3

Where do you get that first neutron?

Two sources:

natural, spontaneous decay releases it(bad in a bomb!)

you make it in yet another nuclear reaction(eg Po210 emits which bombards Be to release n)

Page 27: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 4

Are the output neutron going the right speed to interact with more nuclei?

Perhaps not. You might have to slow them down by having them interact with a moderator. Deuterium, hydrogen, boron and graphite are all good moderators.

Page 28: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 5

What if too many neutrons escape from the surface of the fissionable material?

The chain-reaction ceases. This always happens if the piece of material is too small, below its critical mass. To prevent this, you can:

Surround the material with a reflector (e.g. Be)Compress the material, to make it very dense.

Page 29: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 6

What if you want to control the rate of fission (e.g. reactor, not a bomb)?

You must absorb just enough neutrons so that the rate of fission is constant. These are the control rods in a reactor.

Page 30: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 7

What are the properties of the fission product, e.g. the Ba and Kr in

U235 + n = Ba129 + Kr93 + 3n +

These are very radioactive, and their safe disposal presents a serious problem

Page 31: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 8

How do you get energy – kinetic energy and - out of the chain reaction.

You let them interact with things and generate heat. Bomb: Heat builds up and everything vaporizes in an explosion. Reactor: remove heat steadily using cooling system.

Page 32: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Technical Issue 9

What happens when the neutrons interact with non-fissionable materials.

They can be absorbed, causing these materials to transmute into other isotopes, some of which are radioactive. E.g. cobalt, a trace element in steel:

Co59 + n = Co60

Co60 = Ni60 + + (half life of CO60 is 5.27 years)

Page 33: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Environmental Issues Associated with Nuclear Fission

Production

Storage

Use

Disposal

Page 34: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Production of fissile materials

Production of fissile materials

Mining Uranium and Concentrating the Ore

Concentrating U235

Breeding Pu239

Page 35: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Mining uranium

Key Lake mine, Saskatchewan, Canada

Page 36: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Mining uranium

global distribution of uranium deposits

Page 37: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005
Page 38: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

What’s in the Ore ?

Ore can be up to 25% uranium oxide. The other 75%, in the form of ground up rock (tailings), needs to be disposed of.

Uranium is only mildly radioactive. But the ore contains significant Radon (a gas) and radium (a solid) that are more radioactive.

Page 39: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Among uranium miners hired after 1950, whose all-cause Standardized mortality ratios was 1.5, 28 percent would experience premature death from lung diseases or injury in a lifetime of uranium mining. On average, each miner lost 1.5 yr of potential life due to mining-related lung cancer, or almost 3 months of life for each year employed in uranium mining.

Page 40: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

This wall of uranium tailings, visible behind the trees, is radioactive waste from the Stanrock mill near Elliot Lake, Ontario.

Page 41: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

In 1975, St. Mary's School in Port Hope, Ontario, Canada was evacuated because of high radon levels in the cafeteria. It was soon learned that large volumes of radioactive wastes from uranium refining operations had been used as construction material in the school and all over town. Hundreds of buildings were found to be contaminated

Page 42: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Enriching uranium(separating the U235 from the U238)

Page 43: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Process: UF6 gas passed througha cascade of centrifuges

Page 44: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Creating Pu: requires reactor

French Super Phenix Breeder Reactor

Page 45: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

then chemical separation of Pu from reactor fuel

Sellafield Plant (UK)

Page 46: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Legacy problems – lots of leftoversfrom Manhattan Project and other

military weapons projects

Page 47: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Problems

• Safely shipping of highly-radioactive spent reactor fuel to reprocessing plant

• Accidental release of radioactive materials during chemical processing

• Disposal of unwanted, but very radioactive by-products

Page 48: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Storage

• Here we focus mainly

– Storage of weapons

– Storage of spent nuclear fuel rods

Page 49: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Storage1997 Global Fissile Material Inventories (tonnes)

 HEU (weapon-grade uranium equivalent) **

 Plutonium

Military 1,700    250

Civil     20 1,100

Total  1,720 1,350

 

HEU = highly enriched uranium

Page 50: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Military stockpiles of Pu by country(tonnes)

Page 51: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

A 1 GW commercial reactor contains 75 tonnes of low-enriched uranium.

About 1/3 of the fuel is replaced every 18 months.

Indian Point, about 35 miles north of Manhattan

Page 52: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Current Storage at Indian Point1500 tons spent fuel, stored immersed in “swimming

pools” of water, where

Shrot-lived radionucleides decay away

Storage pool at a Canadian reactor

Page 53: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Some fuel moved to casts

Page 54: Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies Bill Menke, October 19, 2005

Commericial Reactor Usage

About 20% of USelectricity generatedBy nuclear plants