epistemic uncertainty in california-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity

55
pistemic uncertainty in California-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity Fred Pollitz, USGS Menlo Park Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward

Upload: kenny

Post on 07-Feb-2016

17 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity. Fred Pollitz, USGS Menlo Park. Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward. Ward (2000). Rundle et al. (2008). Capabilities of this simulator. Inherently discrete fault zone (Ben-Zion and Rice model) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity

Fred Pollitz, USGS Menlo Park

Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve WardAcknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward

Page 2: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 3: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Ward (2000)Ward (2000)

Page 4: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Rundle et al. (2008)Rundle et al. (2008)

Page 5: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Capabilities ofCapabilities ofthis simulatorthis simulator

Page 6: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

• Inherently discrete fault zoneInherently discrete fault zone

(Ben-Zion and Rice model)(Ben-Zion and Rice model)

• Homogeneous, planar faultsHomogeneous, planar faults

• Viscoelasticity of lower crust/upper mantleViscoelasticity of lower crust/upper mantle

--> loading through backslip in the--> loading through backslip in the

fully relaxed limitfully relaxed limit

Page 7: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

• Fault network and slip rates courtesy of Steve Ward (June, 2009)

• Original set of ~4 x 3 km2

patches are re-grouped and subdivided into set of smoothly-connected, non-overlapping ~1 x 1 km2 patches

• 101208 fault patches

Page 8: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 9: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 10: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 11: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 12: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 13: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 14: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 15: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 16: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Stress history on a single fault patch

Static frictional stress

Dynamic frictional stress

Arrest stress

Dynamic overshoot parameter:

Stress reduction parameter: = s - a

D = s - a)/(s - d)

Page 17: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 18: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 19: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Simulator parameters

Dynamic overshoot parameter:

Stress reduction parameter: = s - a

D = s - a)/(s - d)

Shape of slip-weakening curve

Mantle viscosity m

Page 20: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Twenty consecutive M>6.7 ruptures

M6.9M6.9

Page 21: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.2M7.2

Page 22: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.0M7.0

Page 23: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.6M7.6

Page 24: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M6.7M6.7

Page 25: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.5M7.5

Page 26: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.6M7.6

Page 27: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.2M7.2

Page 28: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M6.7M6.7

Page 29: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M6.7M6.7

Page 30: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.7M7.7

Page 31: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.3M7.3

Page 32: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.5M7.5

Page 33: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.3M7.3

Page 34: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.3M7.3

Page 35: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.2M7.2

Page 36: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M6.7M6.7

Page 37: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.2M7.2

Page 38: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.3M7.3

Page 39: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

M7.5M7.5

Page 40: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

• mean recurrence interval (for given magnitude threshold)

• magnitude-frequency statistics, e.g. b-value

• coefficient of variation

• conditional rupture probability

Simulator results

Page 41: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Hanks and Bakun (2007Hanks and Bakun (2007))

Page 42: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 43: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 44: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Magnitude-frequency statistics

Page 45: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

magnitude

log10

[earthquakeproduction rate (yr-1)]

With slip weakeningD=1.25m= 1.2 x 1019 Pa s

Page 46: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

With slip weakeningD=1.25m= 1.2 x 1019 Pa s

Page 47: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 48: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

Low Mantle Viscosity

Page 49: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

High Mantle Viscosity

Page 50: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 51: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 52: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

magnitude

log10

[earthquakeproduction rate (yr-1)]

Page 53: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 54: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity
Page 55: Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide     simulations of synthetic seismicity

• Fault system behavior is sensitive to simple parameters

• Simulations capture Gutenberg-Richter and characteristic-earthquake behavior

• Comparison of slip maps for the southern SAF suggests that the ‘slip barrier’ nature of a segment boundary depends substantially on mantle viscosity

• Characteristic magnitude and mean recurrence interval may exhibit a systematic dependence on mantle viscosity

Conclusions