estimating the benefit of drought tolerant transgenic crops for ghana ashwin mysore gerald j....
TRANSCRIPT
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Estimating the Benefit of Drought Tolerant Transgenic Crops for Ghana
Ashwin Mysore
Gerald J. Friedman Fellow in Nutrition and
Citizenship
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Transgenic crops, agricultural development & developing countries
Relevance and potential of transgenic crops in developing countries…
The debate continues…ISAAA, 2007.
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
"Will it take a miracle to solve the worlds hunger problems?"
Campbell, 1998; FAO, 2007; Sprague, undated; South Dakota Dept of Agriculture, undated.
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
“ Golden Rice can reduce Vitamin A Deficiency burden in India by 8-59 %”
Golden Rice Humanitarian Board; UN, 1998; Stein, Sachdev and Qaim, 2008.
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
How Much Hope and How Much Hype?Estimating the Benefit of Drought Tolerant Transgenic Crops for Ghana
FAO, 2001; www.luventicus.org
Ashwin Mysore & Kathleen Merrigan, AFE Program, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy
Under Review, World Development
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Drought tolerant transgenic crops in pipeline- Corn, Soy, Cotton, Canola, Tomato
Corn: 2010-2015
MX variety : 10 % higher yield under drought conditionsMY variety : 40 % higher yield
Tomato: Advanced stage of development
TX variety : 20 % higher yield TY variety : 38% higher yield
Africa News Network; AVRDC, 2006; Various media reports and project documents of Monsanto, Evogene
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Why Ghana?
High food insecurity among food crop growing farmers
Low access to irrigation•Total cultivated area (2002-05) : 5.2 mha•Total irrigation potential :1.9 mha•Irrigated area (2000) : 0.31mha
Drought episodes, erratic rainfall compounded by declining soil fertility
Corn and tomato are important crops
Aggrey Fynn et al., 2006; FAOSTAT; FAO, 2005a,b; Horna et al., 2006; IWMI.
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Estimating potential benefits
•Average yield and producer prices (1991-2005)
•Reduction in yield and gross returns due to varying intensity of drought
•Gains in yield due to technology adoption
•Technology Fee
Study variables:
All calculations for Ghana and the US
Outcome indicator of interest: gross returns ($ / ha) with technology adoption
Sprague, undated; USDA, undated.
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Low Medium Severe
Ghana 15 34 50
USA 10 35 50
Based on existing trends – cost difference between traits & countries
Campos et al., 2004; Farm Service Agency, 2007; FAO, 2005a; Heisey and Edmeades, 1998; IITA, undated; USDA Risk Management Agency, 2007.
Technology fees
US: $127/ha; Ghana: $ 71/ha.
Yield loss (%) due to drought incidence
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Returns ($) per $ investment on technology
Technology adoption
Drought intensity
Normal agricultural season
Low drought incidence
Medium drought incidence
Severe drought incidence
Adoption of MX Corn
Ghana - 0.6 -0.66 - 0.74 - 0.8
US - 0.4 -0.46 - 0.61 - 0.7
Adoption of MY Corn
Ghana 0.59 0.35 0.05 - 0.21
US 1.38 1.1 0.55 0.19
Adoption of TX Tomato
Ghana 7.1 5.87 4.33 3.04
US 14.0 12.52 8.76 6.51
Adoption of TY Tomato
Ghana 14.36 12.05 9.13 6.68
US 27.54 24.69 17.5 13.27
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Sensitivity analysis for maize by considering 3 levels of technology fees
Contribution of drought tolerant corn towards household food security
T1: $53.3; T2: $71.0; T3: $88.8
Household (4 members) cost of meeting minimum food and nutrition requirements- $305.2
% household food and nutrition requirements met by adopting MY variety Various levels of
Technology Fee($ /ha) Drought intensity
Normal agricultural season
Low drought incidence
Medium drought incidence
Severe drought incidence
T1 (53.3) 23.4 16.7 8.3 1.2
T2 (71.0) 16.4 9.7 1.3 -
T3 (88.8) 9.4 2.7 - -
Nutrition is our Agendanutrition.tufts.edu
Study implications
Potential for water conservation and management in tomato production
First generation corn varieties unlikely to benefit farmers
Gains to US farmers greatest
Technology fee – key issue which will determine technology adoption and benefits