evaluating an etwinning project: the ql criteria, irene pateraki, gr nss
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quality Label Criteria: How to assess an eTwinning Project
Irene PaterakiGR NSS
![Page 2: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
A European Award?
![Page 3: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Creativity in the class
![Page 4: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Start a journey with others
![Page 5: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
And the journey starts…
![Page 6: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Step 1:Minimum requirement for QL• The project must have common goals and a shared
plan. • It must be finished or in its last stages. • The applying teacher must have done significant
contributions to the project. • A certain degree of collaboration must appear. The
minimum to be considered is using and reacting to partners’ materials.
• Project results must be visible.
![Page 7: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
6 Common indicators for NQL criteria
1. Pedagogical innovation 2. Curricular integration in one or many subjects3. Communication and exchange between
partner schools4. Collaboration between partner schools5. Use of Technology 6. Results, impact and documentation
![Page 8: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
NQL and EQLFrom October 2012 the EQL is awarded by the Central Support Service to schools in a project who: • Have been proposed for the European Quality Label
by at least one National Support Service after a screening process.
• And at least two partners have already received the National Quality Label for the project. The European Quality Label is awarded only once a year and is featured on the eTwinning Portal.
![Page 9: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
QL1: Pedagogical innovationhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJ6dWQaMchg
![Page 10: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
QL1: Pedagogical innovation• it has originality in theme• it uses a variety of pedagogical methods• pupils are the ones who take the lead• pupils interact with their partners and
work collaboratively using different methods like information gathering, problem solving, research, comparative work
• pupils take different roles: artists, journalists, technicians, scientists, actors etc .
![Page 11: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
QL2: Curricular Integrationhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_yYc1cnFCE
![Page 12: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
QL2: Curricular Integration• the project is based on the school curriculum and
sullabi• the main part of the project work is done during
the school hours• the curricular integration in the project is clear• project work allows students develop their skills
and competences• the project-based pedagogical framework has been
explained and documented by the teacher.
![Page 13: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
QL3: Communication and exchange between partner schoolshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSQ_vqTn3rY
![Page 14: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
QL3: Communication and exchange between partner schools• the information sharing has identifiable goals• the communication between pupils is a clear goal
for the teachers• students can share the work, deal with the same
topic, interact and come up with a final outcome• communication activities are designed to
encourage students to read, listen and view the work of their partners
![Page 15: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
QL4: Collaboration between partner schoolshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_ww4NMsFDg
![Page 16: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
QL4: Collaboration between partner schools• collaborative activities go beyond communication:
the partners are not just recipients of information; they are team-- -members, co-- -authors and co-- -creators.
• Collaboration means that both classes need the contribution of their partner class to complete the activity.
• Mixed-- -nationality teams are a very effective best practice for collaborative work. (small group from one class + small group from another class = mixed-- -nationality team)
![Page 17: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
QL5: Use of Technologyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZalOkeV9fk
![Page 18: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
QL5: Use of Technology• good adaptation of tools used by the teachers and
pupils to conduct collaborative activities and sharing information so that real communication and interactions take place between them.
• The tools are used in such way that they ensure the success of the pedagogical objectives of the project
• Full awareness of eSafety issues (pupils are not identifiable, copyright issues on images, music etc. are taken into account)
![Page 19: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
QL6: Results, Impact and Documentation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcb0td_xtXc
![Page 20: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
QL6: Results, Impact and Documentation (1)• Visible
-project results and/or how they are presented online-activity/involvement of pupils (in TwinSpace)-project documentation (planning, evaluation & reflection, feedback possibilities etc.)
• Invisible • impact of the project • -on teachers' skills • -on pupils' skills and knowledge • -social, personal (teachers and pupils) • -on wider community The invisible part can only be evaluated indirectly by reading the project documentation and comparing it to the visible part
![Page 21: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
QL6: Results, Impact and Documentation (2)• A variety of project results presented• Project documentation with information on
evaluation (of most or all parts of the project), on impact on pupils and their skills/knowledge, on impact on teachers' skills and impact on wider community
• The material presented is consistent with the documentation
![Page 22: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Task 1: Project Evaluation A• Split in teams of 4 (mixed nationality group)• Read the framework used for the evaluation of QL• Read the application of the project: “Portraits and
emotions”• Have a look at the TwinSpace: https://twinspace.etwinning.net/3921/home • Discuss with your colleagues and evaluate the
project for each of the criteria 0-5(30 minutes)• Report to the plenary (3 minutes each group)
![Page 23: Evaluating an eTwinning project: the QL criteria, Irene Pateraki, GR NSS](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030300/58818dbe1a28ab0d358b4cb3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Task 2: Project Evaluation B• Read the application of the project:
“Active Detective”• Have a look at the TwinSpace: https
://twinspace.etwinning.net/705/home • Discuss with your colleagues and evaluate the
project for each of the criteria 0-5(20 minutes)• Report to the plenary (3 minutes each group)