evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached …ro% = 1,11±0,13 t = 400±13 °c n°: 50...

7
Alessandra Pensa , Guido Giordano, Sveva Corrado Roma Tre University Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached by PDCs using charred wood analysis © Pensa et al. All rights reserved

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached …Ro% = 1,11±0,13 T = 400±13 °C N°: 50 Ro% = 0,81±0,11 T = 370±11 °C N°: 40 Ro% = 0,84±0,08 T = 372±8 °C 50 µm

Alessandra Pensa,

Guido Giordano, Sveva Corrado

Roma Tre University

Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures

reached by PDCs using charred wood analysis

© Pensa et al. All rights reserved

Page 2: Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached …Ro% = 1,11±0,13 T = 400±13 °C N°: 50 Ro% = 0,81±0,11 T = 370±11 °C N°: 40 Ro% = 0,84±0,08 T = 372±8 °C 50 µm

Aims • Pyroclastic density currents (PDCs) are among the most

hazardous of all volcanic processes in terms of potential

damages due to their concentration and velocity

(dynamic pressure) and temperature.

• how physical properties interact among each other and

with the topography during flow is still matter of debate

and study

• Using Charcoal Reflectance analysis for:

➢ PDCs emplacement temperature evaluation

➢ PDCs flow temperature variation assessment

• Lab work: pyrolysis experiments to simulate the charring

events at different Temperature and Time

Soufrière Hills volcano, 1995 eruption

St. Helens volcano, 1980 eruption

Vesuvius Volcano 79 AD eruption

Soufrière Hills volcano, 1995 eruption

Research Motivation

Sinabung Volcano, 2018 eruption

Fuego Volcano, 2018 eruption

Image from web

Image from web

Images from web

Image from web

Images from web

Page 3: Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached …Ro% = 1,11±0,13 T = 400±13 °C N°: 50 Ro% = 0,81±0,11 T = 370±11 °C N°: 40 Ro% = 0,84±0,08 T = 372±8 °C 50 µm

Field sample Charcoal micro-texture Charcoal Reflectance histogram Reflectance vs. Temperature°C

Temperature evaluation of PDCs has been recently performed using optical analysis of

charred wood (Reflectance analysis - Ro%) embedded within the pyroclastic deposits.

50 µm

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 500 1000

Ro

%

T°C

Scott et al.,

2005

Scott et al.,

2007

Hudspith et

al., 2014

Ascough et

al., 2010

Mcparland

et al., 2009

State of the artOrganic Petrography Equipment

ALBA Lab (Roma Tre Univ.)

The validity of Ro%, has been established in different

case studies, Fogo Volcano, Colima Volcano,

Merapi Volcano, Vesuvius Volcano, Doña Juana

Volcano, Laacher See Volcano, resulting

comparable with the paleomagnetic analysis

(pTRM).

Page 4: Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached …Ro% = 1,11±0,13 T = 400±13 °C N°: 50 Ro% = 0,81±0,11 T = 370±11 °C N°: 40 Ro% = 0,84±0,08 T = 372±8 °C 50 µm

Colima Volcano,

Mexico

2015 eruptionKey studies

50 µm

Due to its not retrograde nature, the process of

carbonification records over time the maximum

temperatures experienced by the wood fragment/tree

trunk/furniture.

This peculiarity has great importance in terms of timing of

charring events, as the charred wood can record the possible

temperature fluctuations in case of multiple pulses event.

This allows to reconstruct the thermal and dynamic of PDCs

history at different steps.

385-400 °C

345-370°C

390-410 °C

From Pensa et al 2018, 2019

Page 5: Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached …Ro% = 1,11±0,13 T = 400±13 °C N°: 50 Ro% = 0,81±0,11 T = 370±11 °C N°: 40 Ro% = 0,84±0,08 T = 372±8 °C 50 µm

Key studies

DJ53D

DJ08Lm3

DJ10A2

Doña Juana Volcano, Colombia

Gro

up

A

Gro

up

B

Gro

up

C

• High T recorded during flow events, • Low T recorded during emplacement• Using only Mean value we lose info about different thermal

eventsv

Mean=430°C

340°C

390°C

470°C

440°C400°C

360°C

Mean=350°C

• Reflectance data generally display unimodal trends, indicating a complete charring at same temperature

• The presence of Polymodal trends, previously discarded, are instead very important as they highlight variations in the charring temperature during the PDC flow

© Pensa et al. All rights reserved

Image from web

Page 6: Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached …Ro% = 1,11±0,13 T = 400±13 °C N°: 50 Ro% = 0,81±0,11 T = 370±11 °C N°: 40 Ro% = 0,84±0,08 T = 372±8 °C 50 µm

N°: 50

Ro% = 1,11±0,13

T = 400±13 °C

N° : 50

Ro% = 0,81±0,11

T = 370±11 °C

N°: 40

Ro% = 0,84±0,08

T = 372±8 °C

50 µm

50 µm

50 µm

MEU

RIN

CA

VE

Laacher See Volcano,

Germany

12.9 ka eruptionKey studies

Laa

ch

er

Se

eM

aa

r

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Temperature

exposition time:

• High Temperature

recorded during

flow events,

• Low Temperature

recorded once

emplaced

Sample 1Samples 2&3

© Pensa et al. All rights reserved

Images from web

From Riede & Zernack 2018

From Riede & Zernack 2018

Page 7: Evaluation of flow and emplacement temperatures reached …Ro% = 1,11±0,13 T = 400±13 °C N°: 50 Ro% = 0,81±0,11 T = 370±11 °C N°: 40 Ro% = 0,84±0,08 T = 372±8 °C 50 µm

Take home message!

Charcoal Reflectance is a valuable proxy for PDCs

emplacement temperature estimation

The polymodality of the Reflectance data histograms is

important in volcanic environment for the identification of

multiple thermal events

The NOT RETROGRADE nature of the charcoal and the rapid acquisition allow us to have a timeframe of the multiple

thermal pulses occurred.

The identification of temperature variation allows a better

comprehension of the thermal energy transport within the

flow.