evaluation plan format - casey county schools kets_district_tec… · web viewgen.fund. 5121 one...
TRANSCRIPT
Technology Plan Casey County Schools
Liberty, Kentucky
http://www.education.ky.org/
http://www.casey.k12.ky.us/content_page.aspx?cid=2
Prepared Date: 11/13/2009Update to Plan Date:
Plan Start Date: July 1, 2010Plan Expiration Date: September 30, 2011
Approved Date: Pending Commonwealth Approval
Acknowledgments There are many who contributed data, gave directional input, agreed to monitor and evaluate, procured funding, and participated in the creation of this technology plan. The persons listed here represent special contributors in our efforts to enhance quality of service and affect student learning. This plan does not list or otherwise cover all aspects or acknowledge every effort of our technology program. It does highlight major support structures to address functional needs of the district and schools.
District Technology Staff Jerome Cummins, CIO/DTCRoy Huff, LAN TechnicianAlejandra Woodrum, System Support Technician
School Principals/AssistantsShawn Pierce, JPEBoyd Harris, LESTim Goodlett, WHEKathy Fogle, CMSBarry Lee, CHS
School Library Media Specialists Delania Luttrell, Jones Park Elem. LMSKathy Pennington, Walnut Hill Elem. LMS
Additional District Contributors Terri Price, Assessment Coordinator
i
Table of ContentsAcknowledgments.......................................................................................................................iTable of Contents........................................................................................................................iiExecutive Summary...................................................................................................................1Planning Process / Methodology................................................................................................2Technology Vision and Goals.....................................................................................................3Student Technology Literacy Skills............................................................................................6Integration of Technology into Curricula and Instruction.........................................................7Current Technology and Resources...........................................................................................9Evaluation.................................................................................................................................10Budget Summary......................................................................................................................11Attachments/Appendices (Optional)........................................................................................12
ii
Executive Summary We have used the KETS Master Plan as a guide for successful planning and implementation strategies since 1993. The 2007 - 2012 Education Technology Master Plan is the third major plan and we still use it to guide, plan and budget overall operations. The initiatives and programs identified within this plan support the Kentucky Board of Education goals of (1) High student performance, (2) A strong and supportive environment in each school for every child, and (3) High-quality teaching and administration in addition to the Casey County Board of Education Commitment to Student Achievement.
The focus of this plan is to identify and ensure the infrastructure necessary to support those identified goals and commitment, provide the necessary tools to identify student needs via formative and summative assessments, and to have properly trained teachers and staff to intervene on the students’ behalf to help them achieve their highest potential.
1
Planning Process / Methodology This technology plan was devised by (1) identifying student educational need(s); (2) setting a plan of action where technology can server to address those needs; (3) setting success goals with oversight; and (4) procure funds to support the action plan.The tools and guides associated with infrastructure, learning devices, software and services are the 2007 – 2012 KETS Master Plan and the budget for the plan years.
2
Technology Vision and Goals We envision technology defining our school district. Every aspect of the educational process from
administrative to student evaluation requires expert command of its use. The ability to focus efforts on specific learning needs and the latitude for self-directed learning are achievable through the use of technology; therefore, we will adapt our methods and tools to advance education and cultivate devotion to learning.
Goal 1Provide network infrastructure capable of delivering reliable, high-speed access to teaching/learning resources.
Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesStrategy/Activity Instructional
OutcomeEvaluation Timeline Person(s)
ResponsibleFunding Source
High-speed network connectivity
Students will access learning resources, research and communication tools
Network uptime 7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC Formula Title IID$16,536 annual
Maintain routers and switches
Students will access learning resources, research and communication tools
Network uptime 7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC KETS$16,100 annual
3
Goal 2Provide communication infrastructure and service to promote partnership between community and schools.
Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesStrategy/Activity Instructional
OutcomeEvaluation Timeline Person(s)
ResponsibleFunding Source
Maintain telephone systems at all schools
Improve student perception of parent and school expectation
Teachers are able to use telephones to communicate with parents
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC General Fund $5121
Maintain an automated voice notification system
Parents will receive important school related announcements
One Call call logs will show communication with parents
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 DPP General Fund $5000
Host district and all school web sites.
Increased communication between schools and public promotes a learning cooperative culture
Site analytics will show traffic from public addresses
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC KETS $3740
Provide telephone service to all sites
Improve student perception of parent and school expectation
Teachers are able to use telephones to communicate
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC General Fund $37164 with USF 80% discount $7432.80
Provide Student Management System
Student progress can be monitored and intervention as needed by all stake holders using IC and Parent Portal.
Portal log 7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, teachers, counselors, administrators, parents
KETS $15,144
4
Goal 3Up-to-date technology tools will be used to support Students using computers and other kinds of technology to collect, organize, and communicate information and ideas.
Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesStrategy/Activity Instructional
OutcomeEvaluation Timeline Person(s)
ResponsibleFunding Source
Support On-line Library Catalogs for all schools - Destiny
Students will find books specific to their need.
Library reports will show activity level
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, LMS KETS $3750
Provide KET Encyclomedia
Students will view information in visual formats.
Teacher lesson plans, survey
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC KETS $3000 annual server/storage cost
Replace workstations as per Master Plan life cycle
Increased time on task from speed, function and reliability
Hardware Inventory.
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, IT Dept. KETS $95,836
5
Student Technology Literacy Skills[The plan must have clear goals and a specific implementation plan detailing how students will acquire technology and information literacy skills as adopted by the Kentucky Board of Education in the Program of Studies for Kentucky Schools Grades Primary-12. The plan must also have a specific implementation plan detailing how students will become technology literate by the end of the 8th grade. Use format shown below. Insert additional goals as necessary.]
Link to the Program of Studies: http://www.education.ky.gov/kde/instructional+resources/curriculum+documents+and+resources/program+of+studies/default.htm
Goal 1Students will use technology to learn, to communicate, increase productivity and become competent users of technology. Students will manage and create effective oral, written and multimedia communication in a variety of forms and contexts.
Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesStrategy/Activity Instructional
OutcomeEvaluation Timeline Person(s)
ResponsibleFunding Source
Portfolio entries will be completed
StudenStudents write using appropriate forms, conventions, and styles to communicate ideas and information to different audiences for different purposes
Critique rough drafts
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 Classroom teachers, LMS, Lab teachers
Existing expenditures
Research a topic and present data using spreadsheets and graphs
StudenStudents use computers and other kinds of technology to collect, organize, and communicate information and ideas
Evaluate criteria and give student feedback
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 Classroom teachers, LMS, Lab teachers
Existing expenditures
6
Goal 2[Insert goal here.]
Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesStrategy/Activity Instructional
OutcomeEvaluation Timeline Person(s)
ResponsibleFunding Source
7
Integration of Technology into Curricula and Instruction
Goal 1Integrate technology into the curriculum to improve student academic achievement.
Action Plan: Projects/ActivitiesProject/Activity Instructional
OutcomeEvaluation Timeline Person(s)
ResponsibleFunding Source
Support Renaissance Place
Reading and math formative and summative evals, intervention to improve reading and math skills
AR, AM, STAR data 7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, classroom teachers
Title I and Local $15,000 software KETS $1000/yr server
Purchase, maintain Study Island for elementary, middle
Improve area content knowledge, consistent tools and data collection across schools for formative assessments, intervention strategies and summative assessments
Study Island school, subject, class, and individual reports
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, 21 Cent, Title I
KETS, Title I, Local, 21st Century $10,000 annual
Purchase, maintain Compass Learning, Success Maker
Students will use technology to support directed and independent learning
Individualized program reports
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 Elem. Principals, Terry Price, Cynthia Durham
ARRA, Local, Title I$102,000
8
Staff Training/ Professional Development Goals
Goal 1Teachers will use various electronic tools for student formative and summative assessments.
Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesStrategy/Activity Instructional
OutcomeEvaluation Timeline Person(s)
ResponsibleFunding Source
Teachers and administrators will receive training on Classroom Assessment for Student Learning
Students will achieve Mastery in content areas
Administrators will monitor teacher implementation of learning targets and assessments
7/1/10 – 9/30/11 Administrators, teachers, curriculum specialists
Formula Title IID $3000, other
9
Current Technology and ResourcesDespite current economic trends that may continue into the next two years, we are positioned to not only maintain current levels of technology but plan to meet the growing needs of our district through server virtualization and the new Microsoft LIVE site with extended collaboration tools. IT staffing is set at a most crucial point where we can sufficiently support the technology for the coming year. While we have added one more full time technical position at the district level, mobile communication devices and mobile computing have most certainly required additional support.The number of teacher and administrator workstations lacking technology hardware items such as DVD readers and writers is a great need at this time. While 95% and 91% of the teacher and administrator workstations respectively met minimum standards, other hardware needs were not part of the standard. The most recent Technology Tools Readiness Survey shows that the percentage of student workstations that meet the minimum standards was 93% overall. The majority of workstations falling below standard generally fell into one of three categories: 1) were slated for replacement within 6 months; 2) insufficient RAM; 3) inadequate HDD. All new workstations are ordered with upgraded RAM and HDDs which should extend the fullest potential of the workstations for the entire life cycle. Several file servers are nearing replacement. One in particular hosts our KET Encyclomedia as a “local host”. We are planning to further consolidate our services using virtualization.The installation of “smart-classroom technology” products and services such as projectors, document cameras, personal response systems, and locally hosted Encyclomedia adds to the tools requiring maintenance and replacement at various intervals. A ten-year minimum operations report has been presented to the CEO and CFO with projections for annual maintenance and replacement that will enable the district to predict operation/ownership costs.
10
Evaluation
Performance Goal 1Evaluate Impact and Implementation of strategies/activities
Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesIndicator Target Tools/Methods
UsedTimeline Person(s)
ResponsibleFunding Source
Network infrastructure
High uptime Network monitoring
7/1/2010 CIO/DTC
Voice communications
Availability Customer reports 7/1/2010 CIO/DTC
Web, IC presence Availability Access 7/1/2010 CIO/DTCLibrary Resources and streaming video/stills
Student and teacher use
Destiny logs, teacher lesson plans
7/1/2010 CIO/DTC
Up-to-date workstations
6-year replacement cycle
KETS Master Plan 8/1/2010 CIO/DTC
Subject area assessment and skill building software
Students will make academic gains
Software reports and logs
12/1/2010 Elem. Principals, classroom teachers, curriculum specialists
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning
Administrators and teachers will adapt teaching and assessments for student success
Principal evaluations, walkthroughs
12/1/2010 Principals, Instructional Supervisors
11
Budget SummarySchool Year: 2010-2011Annual Budget Summary
Acquired Technologies and Professional
Development
Ed Tech Competitive
Title IID
Ed Tech Formula Title
IID
ARRAFormula Title IID
ARRACompetitiv
eTitle IID
E-Rate NCLB/other than Title IID KETS Other (Specify)
Gigabit fiber - schools 16536
Router, switch maint. 16100
Phone sys. Maint. Gen.fund. 5121
One Call Gen. Fund 5000
Web hosting 3740
Telephone service 7432.80 Gen.fund 29731
IC 15144
Destiny (library service) 3750
KET Encyclomedia 3000
Workstation Replace 95836
AR, AM, STAR Title I, Local 15000
Study Island670 Title I, Local,
21st Century 9330
Compass,SuccessMaker ARRA, Local, Title I 102000
Teachers PD 3000
12
TOTAL 16536 3000 7432.80 138240 166182
13
Attachments/Appendices
Ten-Year Technology Cost Projection (assumes current technology level and student to computer 4:1) r11/13/09
Items Under KETS Master Plan Replacement Cycle Year
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Telephone System *15 5121 5121 5121 5121 5121 5121 114745 8048 8048 8048
School Leased Dark Fiber 16536 16536 16536 19080 -25200
School Leased Network Service 0 0 0 0 68640 8640 8640 8640 8640 8640
Data & Voice Wiring *20 (1993)
Network Components *10 18722 18722 18722 18722 54422 19300 126163 19300 46972 19300
File Servers - Instructional *5 13000 18000 5000 5000 13000 18000 5000 5000
Web Hosting 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040
Server Operating System 250 375 125 125 250 375 125 125
Microsoft ISA Server 230 230
CALs (device license 20xx) 5460 5460
CALs (email license 20xx) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
McAfee Endpoint (antivirus) 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150
Infinite Campus (SMS) 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144
Follett (library automation) 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750
Study Island (gr. 2-9 estimate) 636 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000
eInstruction Response Systems 22420
eInstruction Question $1000/site 0 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000
Document Cameras *6 450 31050 26100 14850 450 31050 26100
LCD Projectors *6 767 56758 44486 25311 767 56758 44486
Printers, Instructional + Admin *6 6400 5320 40000 17800 1100 6400 5320 40000
Workstations, Student (current) 108680 95836 119548 102752 145236 153140 142272 95836 119548 99788
and Staff ($988 MasterPlan) *6
Total 221526 197994 285819 299700 309228 284256 455896 175228 314455 289571
14
File Server - MUNIS 14000 *not included in the cost table above -jc
Computer Replacement qty./yr 110 97 121 104 147 155 144 97 121 101
2009 Technology Tools Readiness Survey Results
DIST NAME CaseyADA 2,152
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS 170NUMBER OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS 165
Section 1: Student Instructional Devices/Desktop Virtualization/Home Access
Instructional Devices - Elementary Schools Total Percentage
Number of student Instructional Devices located in standard classrooms 234 64.3% Number of student Instructional Devices located in fixed or mobile labs 130 35.7% Number of student Instructional Devices that are carried and stay with student 0 0.0%
TOTAL of Elementary Student Instructional Devices 364 100% Instructional Devices - Secondary Schools (Middle, HS, Alt) Total Percenta
ge Number of student Instructional Devices in locations that have 3 or less student workstations 43 13.9% Number of student Instructional Devices in locations that have 4 or more student workstations 266 86.1% Number of student Instructional Devices that are carried and stay with student 0 0.0%
TOTAL of Secondary Student Instructional Devices 309 100% GRAND TOTAL 673
Desktop Virtualization - Elementary Schools How many hardware based desktop virtualization cards (i.e. N-Computing, Fiddlehead, MiniFrame) have you deployed in your district? 0 How many additional student instructional access terminals did this create in your district? 0 Desktop Virtualization - Secondary Schools (Middle, HS, Alt) How many hardware based desktop virtualization cards (i.e. N-Computing, Fiddlehead, MiniFrame) have you deployed in your district? 0 How many additional student instructional access terminals did this create in your district? 0
15
Home Access for Students Percentage
1. Percentage of students that have a computer at home? 71.0% a) Percentage of these computers that are less than 5 years old? 70.0% 2. Percentage of students that have Internet access at home? 84.0% 3. Percentage of students for each type of Internet connectivity? 100.0% a) Dial Up 13.0% b) Cable Modem 4.0% c) DSL (usually provided by telephone company) 72.0% d) Satellite Dish 2.0% e) Other 9.0% Home Access for Teachers Percenta
ge 1. Percentage of teachers that have a computer at home? 97.0% a) Percentage of these computers that are less than 5 years old? 74.0% 2. Percentage of teachers that have Internet access at home? 93.0% 3. Percentage of teachers for each type of Internet connectivity? 100.0% a) Dial Up 14.0% b) Cable Modem 5.0% c) DSL (usually provided by telephone company) 75.0% d) Satellite Dish 2.0% e) Other 4.0% Section 2: Age, Mobility and Availability of School District Instructional Devices
** Minimum Standard Specification for PC and Macintosh platform Elementary Schools Total Percenta
ge Total number of student Instructional Devices 364 Number of student Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 319 Number of student Instructional Devices that are laptop 0 Number of student Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Total number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices 92 Number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 84
16
Number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices that are laptop 0 Number of teacher Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Total number of administrator/other Instructional Devices 42 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 39 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are laptop 5 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Secondary Schools (Middle, HS, Alternative) Total Percenta
ge Total number of student Instructional Devices 309 Number of student Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 309 Number of student Instructional Devices that are laptop 33 Number of student Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Total number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices 73 Number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 72 Number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices that are laptop 1 Number of teacher Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Total number of administrator/other Instructional Devices 48 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 47 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are laptop 4 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 District Office Total Percenta
ge Total number of administrator/other Instructional Devices 37 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 30 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are laptop 12 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 How many total Instructional Devices (desktop/laptop/tablet) within the district were purchased/acquired new, from all funding sources, for FY09? 24
17
How many total Instructional Devices (desktop/laptop/tablet) within the district were surplused during FY09? 0 How many total Instructional Devices (mini computing devices) within the district were purchased/acquired new, from all funding sources for FY09? 0
Section 3: Workstation Software Workstation operating system information Instructional Administrativ
e1. How many total Instructional Devices use the following OS? Student
IDUTeacher
IDUAdminstrator/
Other IDUPre-Windows 2000 (DOS, WIN 3.1, 95, 98) 0 0 0
Windows 2000 6 0 0Windows XP 667 165 117
Vista 0 0 10Mac OS 9 (and earlier) 0 0 0
Mac OS 10 0 0 0Other:(workstation/Instructional Devices that have an OS that is neither Windows or Mac
(e.g. Linux) 0 0 0TOTAL (Equals totals from Section 2) 673 165 127
What percentage of all Instructional Devices does the district plan on upgrading to Windows 7 in the next 12 months? 15 2. How many total Instructional Devices use the following Productivity Software? Student
IDUTeacher
IDUAdminstrator/
Other IDUOffice 2003 or Earlier 673 0 0
Office 2007 0 165 127Office 98 for Mac or Earlier 0 0 0
Office 2004 for Mac 0 0 0Open Office or Other 0 0 0
TOTAL 673 165 1273. Has the district began utilizing web-based productivity tools (i.e Office on-line, Google Docs, etc) No
3.a If you answered "Yes", what level of adoption have you achieved? None adopted (0%) Section 4: Other Computing Devices Handheld computer systems (district owned devices only) Instructional Administrativ
e
18
1. Number of standalone PDAs - Device that combines a range of basic computing functions, such as scheduling and contact management. 8 32. Number of Smartphones (Windows Mobile, iPhone, Palm Centro, Palm Pre, Blackberry, etc) - Devices which provide wireless email, texting, internet access and other on-line services. 0 0
TOTAL 8 3 Personally Owned Computing Devices (Laptops/Tablets/Mobile Devices) 1. Has the district permitted personally owned Devices to be brought to school by students? No 2. Has the district permitted personally owned Devices to be brought to school by teachers? No 3. Has the district permitted personally owned Devices to be brought to school by administrators? No Section 5: Technology Leadership Service, Support and Training Resources Total number of days CIO/DTC position is employed during the FY08 school year 240 1. Estimate the percentage of time the CIO/DTC spends performing the following tasks:
1.a) Justifying, obtaining, managing funding for existing technology services or new projects (e.g., e-rate discounts, NCLB technology funds, KETS EDTECH funds, other local, state or federal funds)
5.0% 1.b) Planning, research, preparation, engineering, procurement and installation of new
technology enabled projects or major enhancements to existing instructional or administrative systems
10.0%
1.c) Integration and training of technology tools into instructional and administrative business processes 3.0%
1.d) Operations and maintenance of existing instructional and technology services to schools and district office 60.0%
1.e) Technology related written communications, meetings, customer satisfaction/complaint investigations, public relations, providing data requests, personnel issues, security, and vendor management
10.0%
1.f) Other CIO/DTC Responsibilities 2.0% 1.g) Other Responsibilities outside of CIO responsibilities (e.g., Facilities Director, Teacher,
Supt) 10.0% TOTAL (Section 5 : 1.a - 1.g) 100.0%
2. Number of schools with a STC? 5 3. Are they paid a stipend? If yes, what is the annual average stipend? $0 4. Number of FTE in-house district/school technicians that focus on daily operations and maintenance? 2.0 5. Number of FTE outsourced district/school technicians that focus on daily operations and 0.0
19
maintenance?6. Number of FTE district/school Technology Integration Specialists (Technology/Curriculum Resource Teachers)? 0.0 7. Number of FTE students that assist with technology leadership, services, support and training? 0.0 8. Number of schools with active STLP? 0 9. Are STLP Leaders paid a stipend? If yes, what is the annual average stipend? $0 Student, Instructional and Leadership Technology Skills Students 1.a) Has the district implemented the technology skills for students as defined in the Program of Studies? Yes 1.b) Are these student technology skills evaluated? No 1.c) At what grade level do your students start formally learning and acquiring keyboarding skills? 9th Instructional and Leadership Staff
1.d) Has the district defined and implemented technology skills and knowledge assessments as part of the district evaluation plan for teachers? Yes 1.e) Has the district defined and implemented technology skills and knowledge assessments as part of the district evaluation plan for school leaders (central office and school level leadership)?
Yes
Digital Citizenship Please indicate which of the following nine elements of Digital Citizenship have been adopted as part of the district’s technology culture through either curriculum or an Acceptable Use Policy for students and staff?
Digital Access Yes Digital Commerce Yes Digital Communication Yes Digital Literacy/Education Yes Digital Etiquette Yes Digital Law Yes Digital Rights and Responsibilities Yes Digital Health and Wellness/Safety Yes Digital Security/Self Protection Yes
Section 6: Network Connectivity School Wide Area Network (WAN) Connection to District Hub Site # Schools Percenta
20
ge1. Number of schools connected to WAN via leased line connection (T1 or more)? 0 0% 2. Number of schools connected to WAN via leased line connection (Less than T1)? 0 0%3. Number of schools connected to WAN via Fiber? (district owned or leased) 6 100% 4. Number of schools connected to WAN via Wireless? 0 0%
TOTAL 6 100% Local Area Network Capacity within the Schools 1. What percentage of LAN ports are switched 100MB or above? 100% 2. What percentage of your classrooms are connected to the local area network? 100% 3. What percentage of your Instructional Devices are connected to the local area network? 100% 4. What percentage of your Instructional Devices use wireless to connect to the school LAN? 100% Section 7: Ease of Access to Telephonic Services 1. Ratio of classroom phones to out-going telephone trunk lines? (example, if ratio is 9:1 enter 9) 41 2. Ratio of classroom phones to in-coming telephone trunk lines? (example, if ratio is 9:1 enter 9) 20 3. Number of schools that have implemented Traditional Phone System? 6 4. Number of schools that have implemented a Voice over IP (VoIP) system? 0 5. Number of schools that anticipate to replace/upgrade phone system in the next two years? 0 a) Upgrade/replace to traditional phone system 0 b) Upgrade/replace to Voice over IP (VoIP) system 0 Section 8: Intelligent Classrooms 1. Number of electronic image Projection Devices available to classrooms? (mounted or mobile) 170 a) Number of mounted? 170 b) Number of mobile? 0 2. Number of Plasma/LCD wall-mounted units in classrooms? 0 3. Number of interactive white-boards (mounted or mobile) in classrooms? 1 a) Number of mounted? 1 b) Number of mobile? 0 4. Number of individual responder systems (using clicker type Devices)? 27 5. Number of wireless interactive slates/pads? 25
21
6. Number of Document Cameras? 170 Section 9: Video Conferencing /Web 2.0 Collaboration /On-line Assessment Video Conferencing 1. How many Classroom-type systems (Tandberg, Polycom, etc) does your district own? 0 2. On average, how often are these systems used? Not Applicable3. What other video-based communications does your district use?
a. Desktop-based (WebEx, Adobe Connect, Elluminate, Tandberg MOVI) No b. Web-based (iChat, SKYPE, etc.) No c. One-way video broadcast (webcast, podcast, etc)? No
Web 2.0 Tools Which best describes your district’s use of Web 2.0 Tools (i.e. collaboration tools, social networking tools, etc.) for instructional/educational purposes by teachers and district staff Strictly prohibited
Which best describes your district’s use of Web 2.0 Tools (i.e. collaboration tools, social networking tools, etc.) for instructional/educational purposes by students Strictly prohibitedDoes your district have a Board Policy on the use of Web 2.0 Tools? No Online Assessment Do your students use instructional devices (desktops, laptops, netbooks, etc.) for formative testing purposes? Yes
Please indicate which of the following online formative assessment packages you use in your district (you may choose more than one)
G-MADE (Group Mathematics Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation) No GRADE (Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation Yes MAP (Measures of Academic Progress) Yes PAS (Predictive Assessment Series from ThinkLink/Discovery Education) No Other Yes
Section 10: Federal Reporting Technology Literacy Number of 8th graders (school year 2008-09) that are technology literate as referrenced in the Program of Studies? 141
Number of 8th graders (school year 2008-09) that are not technology literate as referrenced in the Program of Studies? 35
22
Number of 12th graders (school year 2008-09) that are technology literate as referrenced in the Program of Studies? 124
Number of 12th graders (school year 2008-09) that are not technology literate as referrenced in the Program of Studies? 14 Number of teachers that are proficient in Standard 6? 165 Number of teachers that are not proficient in Standard 6? 0 Number of Library/Media Specialists that are proficient in Standard 6? 3 Number of Library/Media Specialists that are not proficient in Standard 6? 0 Number of administrators that are proficient as per the Technology Standards for School Administrators (TSSA) 24
Number of administrators that are not proficient as per the Technology Standards for School Administrators (TSSA) 0
23