evidence search and synthesis nhs education for scotland · evidence search and synthesis nhs...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Evidence Search and Synthesis NHS Education for Scotland
Summary V 0.3
Title
Effective management of optometry emergencies presenting in a community optometry
setting.
This document summarises current evidence on managing optometry emergencies in a
community setting by identifying existing systematic reviews and indicates where systematic
reviews are lacking.
1 Key Messages
Include key messages from all your questions and sub-questions here
• We found no reviews on triaging optometry emergencies
• When we then searched for four conditions considered emergencies we only found reviews
on medical or surgical interventions and none on organisation of services.
3 Background
NES Optometry directorate conducted research to establish priority areas for guidance and
educational support within the profession. At the end of 2013 a survey went out to canvass
opinions from optometrists. Their responses indicated a need for guidance for dealing with
emergencies in the community setting. The TRIADS team in NES were asked to review
guidance for the highest priority topic within emergencies, Flashes and Floaters. NHS
Education for Scotland, Knowledge Services Group were asked for a summary of systematic
reviews and guidance for other emergency conditions.
The question relates to patients presenting to community optometry as emergency cases.
An emergency case is described as any walk-in patient with any condition who has no prior
arranged appointment.
This question is important for a number of reasons. In 2006 there was a change in the
optometrists contract. Everyone in Scotland is now entitled to regular NHS eye exam, and
there is a new emphasis on community optometry as the first port of call for all eye
conditions, all NHS funded. There is an emphasis is on emergency care in the community
and a number of A&E departments are now closed to walk-in patients with eye conditions.
Additional legislation was also enacted due to the changes in the contract – some
optometrists became independent prescribers (so patients don’t need to go anywhere else
to be prescribed any necessary medication as part of their treatment). There are currently
about 85 prescribing optometrists in Scotland. Treating emergencies in the high street
clinics can cause problems as there are often no gaps in the planned appointments.
2
There are a number of local pathways and guidelines for emergency optometry but there is
no consistent pathway as all local set-ups are different.
4 Question(s)
The original question was:
“How can walk-in patients with any type or seriousness of eye condition, who present to
community optometry as emergency cases, be effectively managed and treated?”
5 Scope of this summary
Initially KSG searched for triaging and treatment of emergencies without success and
following discussion with enquirer agreed to focus on emergency management of a limited
number of conditions.
The precise scope is described in the table below.
What the authors of this evidence summary searched for
Expectations Improving identification of eye emergencies in community setting
Client group People presenting with emergency eye conditions of
• Closed angle glaucoma
• Chemical burn or trauma
• Scleritis
• Microbial keratitis
Location Community settings
Impact/improvement Appropriate treatment or referral to GPs or secondary care
Professionals Community optometrists
Service Community optometry clinics
We searched for studies during March -April 2015 for the time period 2010-2015. For details of
search strategy see Appendix 1.
6. Results
No systematic reviews addressing triage for optometry emergencies were identified though
we found one UK case study of a pilot trial of tele-ophthalmology services (see reference 8)
referenced in NHS England consultation document ‘Urgent and Emergency Care Review -
Evidence Base Engagement Document’ June 2013.
We found 15 documents offering clinical guidance but none of these were explicitly
informed by research evidence except a SIGN guidance which did not address emergency
care (see Appendix 3).
We found 7 reviews of medical or surgical care relating to:
3
• Chemical burn x3
• Closed angle glaucoma x1
• Keratitis x 3
• Scleritis - none
These are summarised below.
Reviews summary table
Chemical burns and
injury
Periorbital infections after
Dermabond closure of traumatic
lacerations in three children. (1)
Review of 14 case studies
Chemical burns and
injury
Medical interventions for traumatic
hyphema (2)
Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews on The
Cochrane Library
Chemical burns and
injury
Amniotic membrane transplantation
for acute ocular burns (3)
Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews on The
Cochrane Library
Closed angle
glaucoma
Medication-induced acute angle
closure attack (4)
These include 36 case
reports, four review
articles, three prospective
non-controlled studies, and
one prospective controlled
trial.
Keratitis Topical corticosteroids as adjunctive
therapy for bacterial keratitis (5)
4 RCTs
Keratitis Medical interventions for
acanthamoeba keratitis (6)
Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews on The
Cochrane Library
Keratitis Topical antibiotics for the
management of bacterial keratitis: an
evidence-based review of high quality
randomised controlled trials (7)
Reports use of The
Cochrane Handbook
16 trials
Reviews – details included findings
4
Chemical burns and injury
Citation Periorbital infections after Dermabond closure of traumatic lacerations in
three children.
O'Day Denis M; Li Chun, Alexander Pauline T; Mawn Louise A; (2012)
Periorbital infections after Dermabond closure of traumatic lacerations in three
children.. Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American
Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus / American
Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 16(2): 168-72.
URL http://www.jaapos.org/article/S1091-8531(12)00104-8/abstract
Quality of
review
Only original case reports involving tissue adhesive wound closure and
traumatic laceration that reported the presence or absence of infection.
Date of last search Nov 2010 Date published April 2012
Details reviews 24 Case studies
Authors' comments on quality of studies - Only included original case studies
Conclusions of effectiveness based on statistical meta-analysis
Relevance
of review
Review addresses a sub-question - Chemical burns and injury
Findings
of review
Authors recommendations match the change in guidance - “Dermabond
Advance,” (www.dermabond.com), and the revised instructions for use state
that “Adhesive should only be used after wounds have been thoroughly and
adequately cleaned and debrided in accordance with standard surgical
practice.”
Citation Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema Gharaibeh Almutez, Savage Howard I; Scherer Roberta W; Goldberg Morton F;
Lindsley Kristina (2013). Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (12): .
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005431.pub3/abstract
Quality of
review
Published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on The Cochrane
Library Date of last search Aug 2013 Date published Dec 2013
20 randomized and seven quasi-randomized studies with 2643 participants
Authors' comments on quality of studies -Use of Cochrane Guidance
Conclusions of effectiveness based on statistical meta-analysis
5
Relevance
of review
Address sub question - Chemical burns and injury
List countries of included studies Studies took place in a number of different countries: three in China; two each
in Iran, Sweden, and South Africa; one each in Denmark, Israel, and Malaysia;
and the remainder in Canada and the US Findings
of review
Antifibrinolytic drugs are often used to treat traumatic hyphema and are thought
to be effective, because they delay absorption of blood clots until complete
healing of the damaged blood vessels takes place. This review found that
antifibrinolytics did not affect final vision, but did appear to reduce the risk of
secondary bleeding. However, patients taking one of the antifibrinolytics,
aminocaproic acid, appeared to have more nausea and vomiting compared with
control patients. Two other antifibrinolytics, tranexamic acid and
aminomethylbenzoic acid, also reduced the risk of secondary hemorrhage, but
there was limited information about side effects. It was unclear whether these
medications reduced complications of secondary hemorrhage, because these
events did not occur often in the studies. Other medications evaluated in trials
included corticosteroids, either taken internally or applied as eyedrops;
estrogens; and other kinds of eyedrops. Nondrug interventions included wearing
a patch on one or both eyes, moderate activity versus bed rest, and elevation of
the head versus laying flat. Because the number of participants and events were
small, the evidence for a beneficial effect of any of these interventions is
inconclusive.
Summary of findings Authors' conclusions Traumatic hyphema in the absence of other intraocular
injuries uncommonly leads to permanent loss of vision. Complications resulting
from secondary hemorrhage could lead to permanent impairment of vision,
especially in patients with sickle cell trait/disease. We found no evidence to show
an effect on visual acuity by any of the interventions evaluated in this review.
Although evidence was limited, it appears that patients with traumatic hyphema
who receive aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid are less likely to experience
secondary hemorrhaging. However, hyphema in patients treated with
aminocaproic acid take longer to clear.
Topic Chemical burns and injury
Citation Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute ocular burns
Gerry Clare, Hanif Suleman, Catey Bunce, Harminder Dua (2012) Amniotic
membrane transplantation for acute ocular burns. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews. 9(9): CD009379.
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009379.pub2/abstract
Quality of
review
Published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on The Cochrane
Library
6
Date of last search - June 2012 Date published -Sept 2012
Details -88studies identified, 87 rejected , 1 used
Authors' comments on quality of studies A subset of patients from one RCT (Tandon 2011) met the inclusion criteria for
this review. Due to the paucity of adequate RCTs, we could not conduct a meta-
analysis; instead, we have analysed the data on the subset of RCT participants.
The RCT data were provided by the study authors.
Conclusions of effectiveness based on statistical meta-analysis
Relevance
of review
Addresses sub question - Chemical burns and injury
Findings
of review
Conclusive evidence supporting the treatment of acute ocular surface burns with
AMT is lacking. Heterogeneity of disease presentation, variations in treatment,
undefined criteria for treatment success and failure, and non-uniform outcome
measures are some of the factors complicating the search for clear evidence
regarding this treatment.
Closed angle glaucoma
Citation Medication-induced acute angle closure attack
Gangwani Rita A; (2012) Medication-induced acute angle closure attack. Hong
Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi / Hong Kong Academy of
Medicine. 18(2): 139-45.
URL http://www.hkmj.org/abstracts/v18n2/139.htm
Quality of
review
A PubMed search of literature up to August 2011 was conducted using the
following key words: “acute angle closure glaucoma”, “iatrogenic”, and
“drugs”. A total of 86 articles were retrieved. Only those concerning acute
angle closure attack triggered by local or systemic drug administration were
included. During article selection, prospective studies had a higher ranking
than retrospective studies, and case reports were also included. For articles on
the same or related topics, those published at later or more recent dates were
selected. In all, 44 articles were included and formed the basis of this review.
These include 36 case reports, four review articles, three prospective non-
controlled studies, and one prospective controlled trial. Other references were
also cited for the background and related information of this review article.
These included seven prospective non-controlled studies, one prospective
controlled trial, three retrospective case series, and five review articles.
Date of last search - August 2011 Date published -2012
44 studies included
7
Conclusions of effectiveness not based on statistical meta-analysis
Relevance
of review
Addresses a sub-question - Closed angle glaucoma and relates to adverse effects
of drugs only
Findings
of review
Since acute angle closure attack is a potentially blinding eye disease, it is
extremely important to be vigilant and aware of ophthalmic and systemic
medications that can lead to such attacks in predisposed subjects and to
diagnose the condition when it occurs. The standard of the evidence is poor and
not systematically reported with no mention on the types or standards of trials
incorporated
Keratitis
Citation Topical corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for bacterial keratitis
Herretes Samantha, Wang Xue, Reyes Johann MG; (2014). Topical
corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for bacterial keratitis. Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews. (10): .
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005430.pub3/abstract
Quality of
review
Date of last search - July 2014 Date published - Oct 2014
Includes 4 RCTs
Authors' comments on quality of studies -Generally, the quality of the evidence
based on the four studies we identified was moderate due to the proportions of
participants who were not included in the final study analyses and the
inconsistency of outcomes assessed across the four studies. In addition, three
studies enrolled too few participants (30 to 42) to reach scientifically valid
conclusions.
Conclusions of effectiveness not based on statistical meta-analysis
Relevance
of review
Review addresses a sub question - Keratitis
List countries of included studies - USA, Canada, India, and South Africa, and
included a total of 612 eyes of 611 participants Findings
of review
There is inadequate evidence as to the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive
topical corticosteroids compared with no topical corticosteroids in improving
visual acuity, infiltrate/scar size, or adverse events among participants with
bacterial keratitis. Current evidence does not support a strong effect of
corticosteroid, but may be due to insufficient power to detect a treatment effect.
8
None of the four studies reported an important difference between topical
corticosteroid therapy and placebo or control treatment for reduction in ulcer
size, change in visual acuity, adverse events, or quality of life. One study
reported that healing or cure time in the steroid group was slower than the
placebo group (for every 100 people cured in the control group, only 47 were
cured in the steroid group during the same time period), but the largest study did
not report any difference (for every 100 people cured in the control group, 92
were cured in the steroid group during the same time interval). For adverse
events, none of the studies found a difference between the two groups, except
that one study reported that more eyes in the control group developed
intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. We did not find any information on
economic outcomes.
Citation Medical interventions for acanthamoeba keratitis
Alkharashi Majed, Lindsley Kristina, Law Hua Andrew; Sikder Shameema
(2015) Medical interventions for acanthamoeba keratitis Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews. (2): .
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010792.pub2/abstract
Quality of
review
Published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on The Cochrane
Library
Date of last search Jan 2015 Date published 2015 Only 1 trial included
Authors' comments on quality of studies - was well-designed and had low risk of
bias overall
Conclusions of effectiveness based on statistical meta-analysis
Relevance
of review
Addresses a sub-question - keratitis
List countries of included studies - no restrictions but only 1 trial found which is
a UK study Findings
of review
One study about a very specific aspect of the condition
Results from the one included study yielded no difference with respect to
outcomes reported between chlorhexidine and PHMB. However, the sample size
was inadequate to detect clinically meaningful differences between the two
groups as indicated by the wide confidence intervals of effect estimates.
9
Citation Topical antibiotics for the management of bacterial keratitis: an evidence-based
review of high quality randomised controlled trials.
McDonald EM, Ram FS, Patel DV, McGhee CN (2014) Topical antibiotics for
the management of bacterial keratitis: an evidence-based review of high quality
randomised controlled trials.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 98(11):
1470-7.
URL http://bjo.bmj.com/content/98/11/1470.full
Quality of
review
Reports use of The Cochrane Handbook Date of last search -March 2013 Date published -Nov 2014
16 trials included
Authors' comments on quality of studies -The remaining 16 trials,16–31
involving 1823 participants, were included as described in our Preferred
Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement
(figure 1). Two reviewers (EM and FR) were in full agreement regarding trial
selection. Characteristics of included trials are reported in online
supplementary table S1.
Conclusions of effectiveness based on statistical meta-analysis
Relevance
of review
Review addresses sub question - keratitis
Findings
of review
Results of this review suggest no evidence of difference in comparative
effectiveness between fluoroquinolones and aminoglycoside-cephalosporin
treatment options in the management of BK. There were differences in safety
profile, however. Fluoroquinolones decreased the risk of ocular discomfort and
chemical conjunctivitis while ciprofloxacin increased the risk of white corneal
precipitate compared with aminoglycoside-cephalosporin.
7. Narrative summary
The evidence found does not help with the question about triaging nor is there any strong evidence
for emergency treatment of the four conditions. The guidelines identified did not include
information about the evidence base used to develop the guidelines, with the exception of SIGN
guidelines which is included in the table for information only as it does not deal explicitly with
emergencies.
8. References
10
1. O'Day Denis M; Li Chun, Alexander Pauline T; Mawn Louise A; (2012) Periorbital
infections after Dermabond closure of traumatic lacerations in three children.. Journal
of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric
Ophthalmology and Strabismus / American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology
and Strabismus. 16(2): 168-72.
2. Gharaibeh Almutez, Savage Howard I; Scherer Roberta W; Goldberg Morton F;
Lindsley Kristina (2013). Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews. (12): .
3. Gerry Clare, Hanif Suleman, Catey Bunce, Harminder Dua (2012) Amniotic
membrane transplantation for acute ocular burns. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews. 9(9): CD009379.
4. Gangwani Rita A; (2012) Medication-induced acute angle closure attack. Hong Kong
medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi / Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. 18(2):
139-45.
5. Herretes Samantha, Wang Xue, Reyes Johann MG; (2014). Topical corticosteroids as
adjunctive therapy for bacterial keratitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
(10): .
6. Alkharashi Majed, Lindsley Kristina, Law Hua Andrew; Sikder Shameema (2015)
Medical interventions for acanthamoeba keratitis Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews. (2): .
7. McDonald EM, Ram FS, Patel DV, McGhee CN (2014) Topical antibiotics for the
management of bacterial keratitis: an evidence-based review of high quality
randomised controlled trials.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 98(11): 1470-7.
8. Kulshrestha M (2010) A pilot trial of tele-ophthalmology services in north Wales.
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 16(4): 196.
Date this summary was last updated: April 2015
Suggested citation for this evidence summary:
For further information please contact:
Annette Thain [email protected]
This summary along with others in the series are available electronically at: xxx
11
Appendix 1
Search strings
Search strings
1. Emergency treatment of 4 conditions
Emergenc* or Urgent or Acute or Serious or Trauma*
AND
Closed angle glaucoma or Angle-closure glaucoma or “Closed drainage of eye”
OR
Chemical burn and (Eye or Ocular or Opthal* or Optom*)
OR
Scleritis or sclera* inflammation
OR
keratitis and (microbial or bacterial or fung* or acanthamoeba )
2. Triaging
((Eye or Ocular or Opthal* or Optom* or vision) and (Emergenc* or Urgent or Acute or Serious or
Trauma*)) and (Triag* or Referr*)
Sources searched
1 www.thecochranelibrary.com
2 www.epistemonikos.org
3 www.mcmasterhealthforum.org/hse/
4 http://www.nihr.ac.uk/research/
5 http://srdr.ahrq.gov/
6 http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/insrv/libraries/sure/sysnet/atozreviews.html
7 http://www.healthevidence.org/
8 Medline Systematic review and 2012 filters
9 Royal college optometrists http://www.college-optometrists.org/
http://www.college-
optometrists.org/filemanager/root/site_assets/guidance/urgent_eye_care_template_25_11_13.
pdf =uploaded to EPPI
10 Royal college ophthalmologists http://www.rcophth.ac.uk/
11 Joint college guidance eg
http://www.locsu.co.uk/uploads/enhanced_pathways_2013/joint_colleges_glaucoma_guid
ance.pdf
12 Canadian and other colleges
13 Local guidance eg Lanarkshire LENS , GG&C
14 Evidence based practice in optometry – Australian 2012-13 https://www.eboptometry.com/
15 http://www.optometrists.asn.au/for-optometrists/guidelines/optometry-australia.aspx
16 American Optometric Association http://www.aoa.org/
17 Quality in Optometry http://www.qualityinoptometry.co.uk/
18 ECOO Guidelines for Optometric & Optical Services 22 June 2013 http://www.ecoo.info/wp-
12
content/uploads/2013/07/Guidelines-for-Optometric-and-Optical-Services-in-Europe.pdf
19 Guideline Central – optometry
https://www.guidelinecentral.com/summaries/specialties/optometry/
20 International Council of Ophthalmology
http://www.icoph.org/enhancing_eyecare/international_clinical_guidelines.html
Dynamed
21 http://emedicine.medscape.com/emergency_medicine - guidance for ophthalmology
conditions – best practice in diagnosis and treatment
22 http://www.pathways.scot.nhs.uk/ophthalmology.htm
From 2005 – states 4 conditions investigating should be treated in secondary care as sight
threatening
Search process
56 Papers identified, uploaded to EPPI Reviewer and screened on title and abstract
22 Items excluded on date, language, country or scope
34 screened on full text
Items excluded if not relating to
• early signs and symptoms
• risk to sight if delay in diagnosis
• emergency care
15 guidance documents excluded but listed in Appendix 3
1 case study relating to triaging noted in references
13
Appendix 2
Reviews with abstracts
Topic Chemical burns and injury
Citation Periorbital infections after Dermabond closure of traumatic lacerations in three children.
O'Day Denis M; Li Chun, Alexander Pauline T; Mawn Louise A; (2012) Periorbital infections after Dermabond closure
of traumatic lacerations in three children.. Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for
Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus / American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 16(2):
168-72.
URL http://www.jaapos.org/article/S1091-8531(12)00104-8/abstract
Abstract Abstract: PURPOSE: To report the occurrence of periorbital infections in 3 children treated with the tissue adhesive 2-
octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) after traumatic periorbital laceration., METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the
records of consecutive patients referred to Vanderbilt Children's Hospital for the treatment of periorbital infections to
identify cases associated with the use of Dermabond. The clinical features and outcomes of each case were reviewed.
We performed a meta-analysis of published cases to identify any association of tissue adhesive with wound infection
rate., RESULTS: The review identified 3 patients, all of whom were younger than 3 years of age and developed
cellulitis within 24 hours of wound closure. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic therapy was started in less than 3
hours in all cases. Cultures were obtained in 2 of the 3 cases; both grew Streptococcus pyogenes. Two cases required
surgical intervention, including one with necrotizing fasciitis. In the meta-analysis, the wound infection rate was 1.8% in
tissue adhesive closure and 0.3% in standard wound closure (odds ratio 6.0; 95% confidence interval 0.7-50.3, P =
0.06)., CONCLUSIONS: The development of periorbital cellulitis after the closure of periorbital lacerations with
Dermabond should alert the physician to the possibility of periorbital infection, including necrotizing fasciitis. The
literature review suggests a trend toward an increased infection rate with tissue adhesive closure. We propose that
ineffective wound sterilization before tissue adhesive wound closure may be a contributing factor.Copyright © 2012
American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
14
Topic Chemical burns and injury
Citation Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema Gharaibeh Almutez, Savage Howard I; Scherer Roberta W; Goldberg Morton F; Lindsley Kristina (2013). Medical
interventions for traumatic hyphema Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (12): .
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005431.pub3/abstract
Abstarct Abstract: Background: Traumatic hyphema is the entry of blood into the anterior chamber (the space between the
cornea and iris) subsequent to a blow or a projectile striking the eye. Hyphema uncommonly causes permanent loss of
vision. Associated trauma (e.g. corneal staining, traumatic cataract, angle recession glaucoma, optic atrophy, etc.) may
seriously affect vision. Such complications may lead to permanent impairment of vision. Patients with sickle cell
trait/disease may be particularly susceptible to increases of elevated intraocular pressure. If rebleeding occurs, the rates
and severity of complications increase.Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of various medical interventions in the
management of traumatic hyphema.Search methods: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and
Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and
Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to August 2013), EMBASE
(January 1980 to August 2013), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com),
ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)
(www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We
last searched the electronic databases on 30 August 2013.Selection criteria: Two authors independently assessed the
titles and abstracts of all reports identified by the electronic and manual searches. In this review, we included
randomized and quasi-randomized trials that compared various medical interventions versus other medical interventions
or control groups for the treatment of traumatic hyphema following closed globe trauma. We applied no restrictions
regarding age, gender, severity of the closed globe trauma, or level of visual acuity at the time of enrolment.Data
collection and analysis: Two authors independently extracted the data for the primary and secondary outcomes. We
entered and analyzed data using Review Manager 5. We performed meta-analyses using a fixed-effect model and
reported dichotomous outcomes as odds ratios and continuous outcomes as mean differences.Main results: We included
20 randomized and seven quasi-randomized studies with 2643 participants in this review. Interventions included
antifibrinolytic agents (oral and systemic aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid, and aminomethylbenzoic acid),
15
corticosteroids (systemic and topical), cycloplegics, miotics, aspirin, conjugated estrogens, traditional Chinese medicine,
monocular versus bilateral patching, elevation of the head, and bed rest. No intervention had a significant effect on
visual acuity whether measured at two weeks or less after the trauma or at longer time periods. The number of days for
the primary hyphema to resolve appeared to be longer with the use of aminocaproic acid compared with no use, but was
not altered by any other intervention.Systemic aminocaproic acid reduced the rate of recurrent hemorrhage (odds ratio
(OR) 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.57), but a sensitivity analysis omitting studies not using an intention-
to-treat (ITT) analysis reduced the strength of the evidence (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.09). We obtained similar results
for topical aminocaproic acid (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.10). We found tranexamic acid had a significant effect in
reducing the rate of secondary hemorrhage (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.49), as did aminomethylbenzoic acid as reported
in one study (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.32). The evidence to support an associated reduction in the risk of
complications from secondary hemorrhage (i.e. corneal bloodstaining, peripheral anterior synechiae, elevated intraocular
pressure, and development of optic atrophy) by antifibrinolytics was limited by the small number of these events. Use of
aminocaproic acid was associated with increased nausea, vomiting, and other adverse events compared with placebo.
We found no difference in the number of adverse events with the use of systemic versus topical aminocaproic acid or
with standard versus lower drug dose. The available evidence on usage of corticosteroids, cycloplegics, or aspirin in
traumatic hyphema was limited due to the small numbers of participants and events in the trials.We found no difference
in effect between a single versus binocular patch or ambulation versus complete bed rest on the risk of secondary
hemorrhage or time to rebleed.Authors' conclusions: Traumatic hyphema in the absence of other intraocular injuries
uncommonly leads to permanent loss of vision. Complications resulting from secondary hemorrhage could lead to
permanent impairment of vision, especially in patients with sickle cell trait/disease. We found no evidence to show an
effect on visual acuity by any of the interventions evaluated in this review. Although evidence was limited, it appears
that patients with traumatic hyphema who receive aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid are less likely to experience
secondary hemorrhaging. However, hyphema in patients treated with aminocaproic acid take longer to clear.Other than
the possible benefits of antifibrinolytic usage to reduce the rate of secondary hemorrhage, the decision to use
corticosteroids, cycloplegics, or nondrug interventions (such as binocular patching, bed rest, or head elevation) should
remain individualized because no solid scientific evidence supports a benefit. As these multiple interventions are rarely
used in isolation, further research to assess the additive effect of these interventions might be of value.
Topic Chemical burns and injury
16
Citation Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute ocular burns
Gerry Clare, Hanif Suleman, Catey Bunce, Harminder Dua (2012) Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute ocular
burns. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 9(9): CD009379.
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009379.pub2/abstract
Abstract Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ocular surface burns can be caused by chemicals (alkalis and acids) or by direct heat.
Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) performed in the acute phase (day 0 to day 7) of an ocular surface burn is
reported to relieve pain, accelerate healing and reduce scarring and blood vessel formation. The surgery involves
applying a patch of amniotic membrane (AM) over the entire ocular surface up to the eyelid margins. OBJECTIVES: To
assess the effects of AMT on the eyes of people having suffered acute ocular surface burns. SEARCH METHODS: We
searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library
2012, Issue 6), MEDLINE (January 1946 to June 2012), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2012), Latin American and
Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to June 2012), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials
(mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical
Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the
electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 11 June 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We
included randomised trials of medical therapy and AMT applied in the first seven days after an ocular surface burn
compared to medical therapy alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the
risk of bias of included studies and extracted relevant data. We contacted trial investigators for missing information. We
summarised data using risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: We included
one RCT of 100 participants with ocular burns that were randomised to treatment with AMT and medical therapy or
medical therapy alone. A subset of patients (n = 68) who were treated within the first seven days of the injury met the
inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The remaining 32 eyes were excluded. The included subset
consisted of 36 moderate (Dua classification II-III) and 32 severe (Dua classification IV-VI) ocular burns from alkali,
acid and thermal injuries. In the moderate category, 13/20 control eyes and 14/16 treatment eyes had complete
epithelialisation by 21 days. The RR of failure of epithelialisation by day 21 was 0.18 in the treatment group (95%
confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 1.31; P = 0.09). Mean LogMAR final visual acuities were 0.06 (standard deviation (SD)
0.10) in the treatment group and 0.38 (SD 0.52) in the control group, representing a MD of -0.32 (95% CI -0.05 to -
0.59). In the severe category, 1/17 treatment and 1/15 control eyes were epithelialised by day 21. The RR of failure of
epithelialisation in the treatment group was 1.01 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.21; P = 0.93). Final visual acuity was 1.77 (SD 1.31)
in the treated eyes and 1.64 (SD 1.48) in the control group (MD 0.13; 95% CI -0.88 to 1.14). The risks of performance
17
and detection biases were high, because treating personnel and outcome assessors could not be masked to treatment.
There was also a high risk of bias in the visual outcomes of the moderate category, since mean visual acuity was
significantly worse at presentation in the control eyes. This reduced confidence in the study findings. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Conclusive evidence supporting the treatment of acute ocular surface burns with AMT is lacking.
Heterogeneity of disease presentation, variations in treatment, undefined criteria for treatment success and failure, and
non-uniform outcome measures are some of the factors complicating the search for clear evidence regarding this
treatment.
Topic Closed angle glaucoma
Citation Medication-induced acute angle closure attack
Gangwani Rita A; (2012) Medication-induced acute angle closure attack. Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi
xue za zhi / Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. 18(2): 139-45.
URL http://www.hkmj.org/abstracts/v18n2/139.htm
Abstract Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To review acute angle closure attacks induced by local and systemic medications., DATA
SOURCES: PubMed literature searches up to August 2011., STUDY SELECTION: The following key words were used
for the search: "drug", "iatrogenic", "acute angle closure glaucoma"., DATA EXTRACTION: A total of 86 articles were
retrieved using the key words. Only those concerning acute angle closure attack triggered by local or systemic drug
administration were included. For articles on the same or related topics, those published at later or more recent dates
were selected. As a result, 44 articles were included and formed the basis of this review., DATA SYNTHESIS: An acute
attack of angle closure can be triggered by dilatation of the pupil, by anatomical changes in the ciliary body and iris, or
by movement of the iris-lens diaphragm. Local and systemic medications that cause these changes have the potential to
precipitate an attack of acute angle closure. The risk is higher in subjects who are predisposed to the development of
angle closure. Many pharmaceutical agents including ophthalmic eyedrops and systemic drugs prescribed by general
practitioners and various specialists (in psychiatry, otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology, medicine, and anaesthesia) can
precipitate an acute angle closure attack. The medications include: anti-histamines, anti-epileptics, antiparkinsonian
agents, antispasmolytic drugs, mydriatic agents, sympathetic agents, and botulinum toxin., CONCLUSION: Since acute
18
angle closure attack is a potentially blinding eye disease, it is extremely important to be vigilant and aware of
ophthalmic and systemic medications that can lead to such attacks in predisposed subjects and to diagnose the condition
when it occurs.
Topic Keratitis
Citation Topical corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for bacterial keratitis
Herretes Samantha, Wang Xue, Reyes Johann MG; (2014). Topical corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for bacterial
keratitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (10): .
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005430.pub3/abstract
Abstract Abstract: Background: Bacterial keratitis is a serious ocular infectious disease that can lead to severe visual disability.
Risk factors for bacterial corneal infection include contact lens wear, ocular surface disease, corneal trauma, and
previous ocular or eyelid surgery. Topical antibiotics constitute the mainstay of treatment in cases of bacterial keratitis,
whereas the use of topical corticosteroids as an adjunctive therapy to antibiotics remains controversial. Topical
corticosteroids are usually used to control inflammation using the smallest amount of the drug. Their use requires
optimal timing, concomitant antibiotics, and careful follow-up.Objectives: The objective of the review was to assess the
effectiveness and safety of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for bacterial keratitis. Secondary objectives included
evaluation of health economic outcomes and quality of life outcomes.Search methods: We searched CENTRAL (which
contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2014, Issue 6), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-
Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to July 2014),
EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2014), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS)
(January 1982 to July 2014), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com),
ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials
Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the
electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 14 July 2014. We also searched the Science
19
Citation Index to identify additional studies that had cited the only trial included in the original version of this review,
reference lists of included trials, earlier reviews, and the American Academy of Ophthalmology guidelines. We also
contacted experts to identify any unpublished and ongoing randomized trials.Selection criteria: We included randomized
controlled trials (RCTs) that had evaluated adjunctive therapy with topical corticosteroids in people with bacterial
keratitis who were being treated with antibiotics.Data collection and analysis: We used the standard methodological
procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.Main results: We found four RCTs that met the inclusion criteria of
this review. The total number of included participants was 611 (612 eyes), ranging from 30 to 500 participants per trial.
One trial was included in the previous version of the review, and we identified three additional trials through the
updated searches in July 2014. One of the three smaller trials was a pilot study of the largest study: the Steroids for
Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT). All trials compared the treatment of bacterial keratitis with topical corticosteroid and
without topical corticosteroid and had follow-up periods ranging from two months to one year. These trials were
conducted in the USA, Canada, India, and South Africa.All trials reported data on visual acuity ranging from three
weeks to one year, and none of them found any important difference between the corticosteroid group and the control
group. The pilot study of the SCUT reported that time to re-epithelialization in the steroid group was 53% slower than
the placebo group after adjusting for baseline epithelial defect size (hazard ratio (HR) 0.47; 95% confidence interval
(CI) 0.23 to 0.94). However, the SCUT did not find any important difference in time to re-epithelialization (HR 0.92;
95% CI 0.76 to 1.11). For adverse events, none of the three small trials found any important difference between the two
treatment groups. The investigators of the largest trial reported that more patients in the control group developed
intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation (risk ratio (RR) 0.20; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.90). One trial reported quality of life and
concluded that there was no difference between the two groups (data not available). We did not find any reports
regarding economic outcomes.Although the four trials were generally of good methodological design, all trials had
considerable losses to follow-up (10% or more) in the final analyses. Further, three of the four trials were underpowered
to detect treatment effect differences between groups and inconsistency in outcome measurements precluded meta-
analyses for most outcomes relevant to this review.Authors' conclusions: There is inadequate evidence as to the
effectiveness and safety of adjunctive topical corticosteroids compared with no topical corticosteroids in improving
visual acuity, infiltrate/scar size, or adverse events among participants with bacterial keratitis. Current evidence does not
support a strong effect of corticosteroid, but may be due to insufficient power to detect a treatment effect.
20
Topic Keratitis
Citation Medical interventions for acanthamoeba keratitis
Alkharashi Majed, Lindsley Kristina, Law Hua Andrew; Sikder Shameema (2015) Medical interventions for
acanthamoeba keratitis Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (2): .
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010792.pub2/abstract
Abstract Abstract: Background: Acanthamoeba are microscopic, free-living, single-celled organisms which can infect the eye
and lead to Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK). AK can result in loss of vision in the infected eye or loss of eye itself;
however, there are no formal guidelines or standards of care for the treatment of AK.Objectives: To evaluate the relative
effectiveness and safety of medical therapy for the treatment of AK.Search methods: We searched CENTRAL (which
contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2015, Issue 1), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-
Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to January
2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2015), PubMed (1948 to January 2015), Latin American and Caribbean
Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (1982 to January 2015), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT)
(www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO)
International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or
language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 9 January
2015.Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy for AK, regardless of the
participants? age, sex, or etiology of disease. We included studies that compared either anti-amoeba therapy (drugs used
alone or in combination with other medical therapies) with no anti-amoeba therapy or one anti-amoeba therapy with
another anti-amoeba therapy.Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently screened search results and full-
text reports, assessed risk of bias, and abstracted data. We used standard methodological procedures as set forth by the
Cochrane Collaboration.Main results: We included one RCT (56 eyes of 55 participants) in this review. The study
compared two types of topical biguanides for the treatment of AK: chlorhexidine 0.02% and polyhexamethylene
biguanide (PHMB) 0.02%. All participants were contact lens wearers with a median age of 31 years. Treatment duration
ranged from 51 to 145 days. The study, conducted in the UK, was well-designed and had low risk of bias
overall.Outcome data were available for 51 (91%) of 56 eyes. Follow-up times for outcome measurements in the study
were not reported. Resolution of infection, defined as control of ocular inflammation, relief of pain and photosensitivity,
and recovery of vision, was 86% in the chlorhexidine group compared with 78% in the PHMB group (relative risk (RR)
1.10, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.84 to 1.42). In the chlorhexidine group, 20 of 28 eyes (71%) had better visual
acuity compared with 13 of 23 eyes (57%) in the PHMB group at final follow-up (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.94). Five
21
participants required therapeutic keratoplasty: 2 in the chlorhexidine group compared with 3 in the PHMB group (RR
0.55, 95% CI 0.10 to 3.00). No serious adverse event related to drug toxicity was observed in the study.Authors'
conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to evaluate the relative effectiveness and safety of medical therapy for the
treatment of AK. Results from the one included study yielded no difference with respect to outcomes reported between
chlorhexidine and PHMB. However, the sample size was inadequate to detect clinically meaningful differences between
the two groups as indicated by the wide confidence intervals of effect estimates.
Topic Keratitis
Citation Topical antibiotics for the management of bacterial keratitis: an evidence-based review of high quality randomised
controlled trials.
McDonald EM, Ram FS, Patel DV, McGhee CN (2014) Topical antibiotics for the management of bacterial keratitis: an
evidence-based review of high quality randomised controlled trials.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 98(11):
1470-7.
URL http://bjo.bmj.com/content/98/11/1470.full
Abstract Abstract: BACKGROUND: Severe bacterial keratitis (BK) typically requires intensive antimicrobial therapy. Empiric
therapy is usually with a topical fluoroquinolone or fortified aminoglycoside-cephalosporin combination. Trials to date
have not reached any consensus as to which antibiotic regimen most effectively treats BK. METHODS: A systematic
review and meta-analysis using Cochrane methodology was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of topical
antibiotics in the management of BK. Outcomes included treatment success, time to cure, serious complications of
infection and adverse effects. RESULTS: A comprehensive search for trials resulted in 27 956 abstracts for review. This
eventually resulted in 16 high quality trials involving 1823 participants included in the review. Treatment success, time
to cure and serious complications of infection were comparable among all antibiotic treatments included in the review.
Furthermore, there was no evidence of difference in the risk of corneal perforation with any included antibiotics or
antibiotic classes. Fluoroquinolones significantly reduced risk of ocular discomfort and chemical conjunctivitis but
22
increased the risk of white precipitate formation compared with aminoglycoside-cephalosporin. Fortified tobramycin-
cefazolin was approximately three times more likely to cause ocular discomfort than other topical antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this review suggest no evidence of difference in comparative effectiveness between
fluoroquinolones and aminoglycoside-cephalosporin treatment options in the management of BK. There were
differences in safety profile, however. Fluoroquinolones decreased the risk of ocular discomfort and chemical
conjunctivitis while ciprofloxacin increased the risk of white corneal precipitate compared with aminoglycoside-
cephalosporin.
Topic General emergency
Citation A pilot trial of tele-ophthalmology services in north Wales
Kulshrestha M (2010) A pilot trial of tele-ophthalmology services in north Wales. Journal of Telemedicine and
Telecare. 16(4): 196.
URL http://jtt.sagepub.com/content/16/4/196.abstract
Abstract Abstract: We identified the need for a tele-ophthalmology service at the Tywyn hospital in Wales. During a two-year
period, 22 emergency patients were managed by telemedicine, thereby reducing the need for ambulance transfer. We
expect that there will be increased use of tele-ophthalmology in north Wales as the technology improves and the
equipment becomes easier to use.
23
Appendix 3
Guidelines identified by
Although we found 15 documents offering clinical guidance none of these were explicitly informed by research evidence.
Burns and injury
Commissioning better eye care
The College of Optometrists and The Royal College of Ophthalmology
www.college-optometrists.org/filemanager/root/site_assets/guidance/urgent_eye_care_template_25_11_13.pdf
2013
Burns and injury
Trauma Chemical The College of Optometrists http://www.college-optometrists.org/en/utilities/document-summary.cfm/docid/137E793D-D7F2-49F1-8F17936C435E820F
2011
Closed angle glaucoma
Glaucoma (primary angle closure) (PACG)
The College of Optometrists http://www.college-optometrists.org/en/utilities/document-summary.cfm/docid/A292CCFD-42BE-4A3B-9B663C886D463F00
2013
Closed angle glaucoma
Commissioning better eye care: Glaucoma
The College of Optometrists and The Royal College of Ophthalmo
http://www.locsu.co.uk/uploads/enhanced_pathways_2013/joint_colleges_glaucoma_guidance.pdf
2013
Closed angle glaucoma
Care of the Patient with Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (QRG-5).
American Optometric Association
http://www.aoa.org/documents/optometrists/QRG-5.pdf
2001
24
Closed angle glaucoma
ICO International Clinical Guideline, Primary Angle Closure (Initial evaluation and therapy).
International Council of Ophthalmology
http://www.icoph.org/resources/resources_detail/90/ICO-International-Clinical-Guideline-Primary-Angle-Closure-Initial-evaluation-and-therapy.html
2011
Closed angle glaucoma
Glaucoma referral and safe discharge A national clinical guideline
SIGN 144 • Glaucoma referral and safe discharge
http://sign.ac.uk/pdf/SIGN144.pdf 2015
General emergency
NHS England Review of Urgent and Emergency Care Services JOINT RESPONSE
The College of Optometrists http://www.college-optometrists.org/en/utilities/document-summary.cfm/docid/AB07CFBF-26A7-4A23-9316DBA9FA17E885
2013
General emergency
Emergency Eye Care The Royal College of Ophthalmologists
https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/2013_PROF_203_EmergencyEyeCare.pdf
2014
General emergency
Emergency Eye Care The College of Optometrists and The Royal College of Ophthalmo
http://www.college-optometrists.org/filemanager/root/site_assets/guidance/urgent_eye_care_template_25_11_13.pdf
2013
General emergency
ICO Emergency Ophthalmology Handbook for Junior Residents and Medical Students
International Council of Ophthalmology
http://www.icoph.org/resources/153/ICO-Emergency-Ophthalmology-Handbook-for-Junior-Residents-and-Medical-Students.html
(2010
Keratitis Microbial keratitis (bacterial, fungal)
The College of Optometrists http://www.college-optometrists.org/en/utilities/document-
2013
25
summary.cfm/docid/B5A5F28A-AC2A-4B8F-918345D87DE1ADA9
Keratitis ICO International Clinical
Guideline Bacterial Keratitis (Initial evaluation).
International Council of Ophthalmology
http://www.icoph.org/resources/resources_detail/74/ICO-International-Clinical-Guideline-Bacterial-Keratitis-Initial-evaluation-.html
2011
Keratitis ICO International Clinical Guideline, Bacterial Keratitis (Management recommendations).
International Council of Ophthalmology
http://www.icoph.org/resources/resources_detail/75/ICO-International-Clinical-Guideline-Bacterial-Keratitis-Management-recommendations--.html
2011
Scleritis Scleritis. The College of Optometrists http://www.college-optometrists.org/en/utilities/document-summary.cfm/docid/205F6E8F-A882-4697-8B2D281F476F850D
2011