evolution of protein coding sequences

32
Evolution of protein coding sequences

Upload: willow-roy

Post on 02-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Evolution of protein coding sequences. Single substitution. Multiple substitution. Coincidental substitution. C. A. T. G. A. A. A. A. C. C. 1 change, 1 difference. 2 changes, 1 difference. 2 change, 1 difference. Parallel substitution. Convergent substitution. Back substitution. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Evolution of protein coding sequences

Page 2: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Kinds of nucleotide substitutionsGiven 2 nucleotide sequences, how their similarities and differences arose from a common ancestor? We assume A the common ancestor:

A

A

C

Single substitution

1 change, 1 difference

T

A

A

C

Multiple substitution

2 changes, 1 difference

A

C

G

Coincidental substitution

2 change, 1 difference

A

C

C

Parallel substitution

2 changes, no difference

A

T

T

C

Convergent substitution

3 changes, no difference

A

A

AC

Back substitution

2 changes, no difference

Page 3: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Important properties inherent to

the standard genetic code

Page 4: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Synonymous vs nonsynonymous substitutions• Nondegenerate sites: are codon position where mutations always result in amino acid substitutions.

(exp. TTT (Phenylalanyne, CTT (leucine), ATT (Isoleucine), and GTT (Valine)).

• Twofold degenerate sites: are codon positions where 2 different nucleotides result in the translation of the same aa, and the 2 others code for a different aa.

(exp. GAT and GAC code for Aspartic acid (asp, D),

whereas GAA and GAG both code for Glutamic acid (glu, E)).

• Threefold degenerate sites: are codon positions where changing 3 of the 4 nucleotides has no effect on the aa, while changing the fourth possible nucleotide results in a different aa.There is only 1 threefold degenerate site: the 3rd position of an isoleucine codon. ATT, ATC, or ATA all encode isoleucine, but ATG encodes methionine.

Page 5: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Standard genetic code

• Three amino acids: Arginine, Leucine and Serine are encoded by 6 different codons:

• Five amino-acids are encoded by 4 codons which differ only in the third position. These sites are called “fourfold degenerate” sites

• Fourfold degenerate sites: are codon positions where changing a nucleotide in any of the 3 alternatives has no effect on the aa.

exp. GGT, GGC, GGA, GGG(Glycine);

CCT,CCC,CCA,CCG(Proline)

Page 6: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Standard genetic code• Nine amino acids are encoded by a pair of codons which differ by a transition substitution at the third position. These sites are called “twofold degenerate” sites.

• Isoleucine is encoded by three codons(with a threefold degenerate site)

• Methionine and Triptophan are encoded by single codon

• Three stop codons: TAA, TAG and TGA

Transition:

A/G; C/T

Page 7: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Evolution of protein coding sequences

• Some amino acid substitutions require more DNA substitutions than others

• Ile Thr : at least one DNA change• AUU ACU• AUC ACC• AUA ACA

• Ile Cys: at least two DNA changes• AUU (Ile) AGU (Ser) UGU (Cys)• AUU (Ile) UUU (Phe) UGU (Cys)

Page 8: Evolution of protein coding sequences

SEQ.1 GAA GTT TTT

SEQ.2 GAC GTC GTA

Glu Val Phe

Asp Val Val

•Codon 1: GAA --> GAC ;1 nuc. diff., 1 nonsynonymous difference;

•Codon 2: GTT --> GTC ;1 nuc. diff., 1 synonymous difference;

•Codon 3: counting is less straightforward:

TTT(F:Phe)

GTT(V:Val) TTA(L:Leu)

GTA(V:Val)

1 2Path 1 : implies 1 non-synonymous and 1 synonymous substitutions;Path 2 : implies 2 non synonymous substitutions;

Example: 2 homologous sequences

Page 9: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Evolution of protein coding sequences

• Redundancy of the genetic code• Biochemical properties of amino acids

• Under neutral evolution (no effect of selection) amino acids should replace each other with a probability determined by the number of DNA substitutions

Page 10: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Evolution of protein coding sequences

• Some amino acid substitutions require more DNA substitutions than others

• Ile Thr : at least one DNA change• AUU ACU• AUC ACC• AUA ACA

• Ile Cys: at least two DNA changes• AUU (Ile) AGU (Ser) UGU (Cys)• AUU (Ile) UUU (Phe) UGU (Cys)

Page 11: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Rates and patterns of nucleotide substitution

• Influenced by three things– Functional constraint (negative selection)– Positive selection– Mutation rate

Page 12: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Rate of nucleotide substitution

• K = mean number of substitutions per site• T = time since divergence • rate = r = number of substitutions per site

per year• r = K/2T

Sequence 1 Sequence 2

Ancestralsequence

T T

Page 13: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Genomes 2 edition 2002. T.A. Brown

Gene tree - Species tree

Species tree

A B C

Gene tree

A B C

Time Duplication

Duplication

Speciation

Speciation

A B C

Page 14: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Allele A Allele BAncestral species

Human Gorilla

speciation

Common ancestor of sequencesT

ime

Page 15: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Evolution of protein-coding sequences

• The Genetic Code is redundant• Some nucleotide changes do not change

the amino acid coded for– 3rd codon position often synonymous– 2nd position never – 1st position sometimes

Page 16: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Standard Genetic CodePhe UUU Ser UCU Tyr UAU Cys UGU

UUC UCC UAC UGC

Leu UUA UCA ter UAA ter UGA

UUG UCG ter UAG Trp UGG

Leu CUU Pro CCU His CAU Arg CGU

CUC CCC CAC CGC

CUA CCA Gln CAA CGA

CUG CCG CAG CGG

Ile AUU Thr ACU Asn AAU Ser AGU

AUC ACC AAC AGC

AUA ACA Lys AAA Arg AGA

Met AUG ACG AAG AGG

Val GUU Ala GCU Asp GAU Gly GGU

GUC GCC GAC GGC

GUA GCA Glu GAA GGA

GUG GCG GAG GGG

Page 17: Evolution of protein coding sequences

rates

• In general ...• Rates of nucleotide substitution are lowest

at nondegenerate sites (0.78 x 10-9 per site per year)

• Intermediate at two-fold degenerate sites (2.24 x 10-9)

• Highest at fourfold degenerate sites (3.71 x 10-9)

Page 18: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Effect of amino acid substitutions

• Deleterious 86%• Neutral 14%• Advantgageous 0.0% ? (very low)

• In protein coding sequences, selection is often acting to remove changes

• Less common outcome is drift of neutral changes

• Rarely see positive selection for advantageous changes

Page 19: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Functional Constraint

• Proteins often have some functional constraint

• The stronger the functional constraint, the slower the rate of evolution

Page 20: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Haemoglobin

• Haeme pocket is highly constrained at protein seq. level

• Remainder of protein only constrained to be hydrophillic

Page 21: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Histone 4

• Two copies in Histone octamer

• Forms complex with other histones and binds DNA into chromatin

• Almost the whole protein is highly constrained

Page 22: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Fibrinopeptides

• Hardly any sequence constraint

Page 23: Evolution of protein coding sequences
Page 24: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Rates and Patterns

• Patterns of change can be informative of the function of a protein

• Different genes evolve at different rates• Amino acids that are always conserved

are likely to be critical to the function

Page 25: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Biochemical properties

Page 26: Evolution of protein coding sequences
Page 27: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Histone 4

• Highly conserved protein

• Compare human and wheat H4 genes

• 55 DNA differences• 2 amino acid differences

– Val Ile (both aliphatic)– Lys Arg (both charged)

Page 28: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Evolution of non-coding regions

• homologous sequences• e.g., compare introns of homologous

genes• 5’ UTR and 3’ UTR (untranslated region)• Pseudogenes

Page 29: Evolution of protein coding sequences
Page 30: Evolution of protein coding sequences
Page 31: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Synonymous substitution rate variation

• Synonymous rates may differ between genes

• How come?

• Maybe different mutation rates in different parts of the genome

Page 32: Evolution of protein coding sequences

Variation in the rates of synonymous substitutions: Secondary structure constraints

• Stems in secondary RNA structures are more constrained than loops.