exploring service-oriented architecture (soa) to support justice-related information sharing steven...
DESCRIPTION
Where We Have Been—Global Support (continued) GAC’s resolution statement (continued) –Recognizes SOA as the recommended framework for development of justice information sharing systems. –Adopts the report’s action agenda for its activities to further the utility of SOA for the justice community. –Urges the members of the justice community to take corollary steps in the development of their own systems.”TRANSCRIPT
Exploring Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)to Support
Justice-Related Information Sharing
Steven E. Correll, ChairGlobal Infrastructure/Standards Working Group (GISWG)
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Where We Have Been—Global Support• September 2004—The GAC is presented with the GISWG
report, recommending SOA for the justice community’s information sharing needs. In response, the GAC unanimously adopts the following resolution.– “The GAC adopts this report (as amended to address
privacy and information quality issues) of the Global Infrastructure/Standards Working Group, titled A Framework for Justice Information Sharing: Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) [located at http://it.ojp.gov/documents/20041209_SOA_Report.pdf].
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Where We Have Been—Global Support (continued)
• GAC’s resolution statement (continued)
– Recognizes SOA as the recommended framework for development of justice information sharing systems.
– Adopts the report’s action agenda for its activities to further the utility of SOA for the justice community.
– Urges the members of the justice community to take corollary steps in the development of their own systems.”
www.it.ojp.gov/global
GISWG RespondsNovember 2004 and February 2005—• First meetings post-GAC endorsement of SOA• Activities
– Continuing in-house education by industry experts regarding SOA – Division of GISWG talent into key SOA-issue subcommittees
• Registries• Services• Standards• Interagency agreements (staff project/future subcommittee)
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Registries Subcommittee• Leadership—Kael Goodman
Chief Information Officer and Deputy Commissioner, New York City Departments of Correction and Probation
• Subcommittee Mission Statement – To clarify the role and use of registries– To help drive deployment in the justice community
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Registries Subcommittee (continued)
• Action Plan– TASK 1: Draft description of a SOA registry—expanding
on the GISWG SOA document paragraph• Role• Necessary functions• How this fits with the other SOA components and
other work being done – Audience – Policymakers
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Registries Subcommittee (continued)
• Action Plan (continued)
– TASK 2: Environmental assessment of SOA registries (product maturity and state of the art)
• Buy vs. build• Assess range of availability• Assess available products• Inventory relevant implementations
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Registries Subcommittee (continued)
• Action Plan (continued)– TASK 3: Implementation/deployment strategy
• Plan for registry implementation/development• Make recommendations to BJA and OJP• Make recommendations to other audiences
– State and local policymakers– State and local technology managers– The vendor community– Other federal funding agencies
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Services Subcommittee• Leadership—Tom Clarke, Ph.D.
Chief Information Officer National Center for State Courts
• Subcommittee Mission Statement– To develop a process to identify, define, and deploy a
consistent set of justice services– To validate the process through the identification and
definition of an initial set of justice services
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Services Subcommittee (continued)
• Action Plan– Executive Overview: SOA Services Paper—GAC,
Policymakers– Services Implementation Road Map—associations, DOJ,
DHS, decision makers, and technology managers – Services Implementation Scenarios—associations, DOJ,
DHS, decision makers, and technology managers
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Standards Subcommittee (continued)
• Leadership—Jennifer ZeunikProject Manager IACP – Law Enforcement Information Technology Standards Council Technology Center
• Subcommittee Mission Statement– To identify applicable standards currently available– To identify gaps in available standards (based on the Global vision)– To identify the appropriate process(es) to address any gaps
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Standards Subcommittee (continued)
• Action Plan– Develop a document that identifies, clarifies, and promotes the development and
utilization of standards for a SOA environment – Develop a model interagency agreement for sharing data in a SOA environment– Make recommendations to Global to promote incremental SOA implementation– Develop an outreach strategy– Subcommittee hopes to accomplish
• Acceptance by the justice community of standards in support of a SOA• Acceleration of the sharing of information within the justice community and other
appropriate entities• Establishment of an awareness and value of an incremental deployment strategy• Creation of presentations in multiple mediums to promote awareness and
acceptance
www.it.ojp.gov/global
Ongoing GISWG Standards Efforts• Evolution, Promotion, and Leveraging of the Global
Justice XML Data Model (Global JXDM)– Global XML Structure Task Force – GJXDM Training and Technical Assistance Committee– DOJ/DHS Partnership: National Information Exchange
Model (NIEM)
Exploring Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)to Support
Justice-Related Information Sharing
Steven E. Correll, ChairGlobal Infrastructure/Standards Working Group (GISWG)