external audit report in fulfilment of the … waste site_external... · introduction ... a wml was...

EXTERNAL AUDIT REPORT IN FULFILMENT OF THE WASTE

MANAGEMENT LICENSE FOR THE

DECOMISSIONING AND REMEDIATION OF THE

KLIP WASTE SITE

AT

ARCELORMITTAL VEREENIGING WORKS

Report Nr: 194-ZANAMVE-2015

Audit date: 13 May 2015

Report date: 05 June 2015

ArcelorMittal Vanderbijlpark

External audit report on the WML for Klip waste site at AMSA Vereeniging

2 Report: 192-ZANAMVE-2015 Zantow Environmental Consulting Services

General Information

Report Name: External Audit Report for the Decommissioning and Remediation of the Klip

Waste Site

Environmental Auditor

Zantow Environmental Consulting Services CC

22 Delius Street, SW 5

Vanderbijlpark

PO Box 3858

Vanderbijlpark , 1911

Contact Person:

Trevor Hallatt

Tel: 082 574 6658

Fax: 016 932 4976

Email: [email protected]

Client:

ArcelorMittal South Africa Vereeniging Works

PO Box 48

Vereeniging

1930

Contact Person:

Waste Management Control Officer (WMCO)

Jeremiah Mnisi

Cell: 083 468 1562

Email: [email protected]

Report compiled by: Trevor Hallatt

Audit Date: 13 May 2015

Status: Final

License Nr 12/9/11/L130/3

mailto:[email protected]




EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Zantow Environmental Consulting Services CC was appointed by ArcelorMittal to conduct an independent

compliance audit on its waste management license (License Nr 12/9/11/L130/3) for the decommissioning of

the Klip Waste Site in terms of condition 7.2.1 of the WML issued on the 10th March 2010.

The methodology followed for conducting the compliance assessment audit included;

Documentation review

Compilation of audit checklist/questionnaire for site visit;

Site Visit (Conducted on the 13th

May 2013); and

Compilation of compliance audit report.

The compliance to each condition of the license was assessed and the details are contained in Table 1.

Compliance to the conditions is categorised in terms of compliance, partial compliance or non-compliance.

In addition to indicating non-compliance or partial compliance, the auditor contextualised the non-compliance

in terms of the intensity. This equates to an objective view of the seriousness of the non-compliance and also

then leads to recommendations where moderate to critical non-compliances have been observed. The non-

compliances are categorised in terms of the following criteria:

Minor Issues

Moderate Issues

Critical Issues

Where an area of improvement has been identified, an observation is raised. This does not constitute a non-

compliance per se, but could lead to improved management systems or controls. ArcelorMittal reserves the

right to implement these at their discretion. The non-compliances raised during the audit mainly relate to

groundwater monitoring requirements and to a lesser extent to some operational controls.

The following findings were raised and recommendations made to improve compliance to the WML;

Monitoring is not undertaken at all of the required boreholes as some of the boreholes have been

damaged and are blocked. It was reported that a contractor started on the 27th of May 2015 to repair

the blocked boreholes, issue each a lockable cap and establish poles to clearly mark the respective

boreholes. Once the boreholes have been repaired, monitoring must commence at the required

frequencies at all of the boreholes (WMCO, June 2015).

At the time of the audit it was reported that monitoring of organic elements commenced in 2014,

however TOC was not monitored in the third quarter (November) of the 2014 reporting period. The

sampling and analysis must be re-assessed in terms of the license and the required elements be

monitored as required until an agreement is reached with the authorities to amend the condition

(WMCO, July 2015).

No gas monitoring is undertaken as required. An amendment application was submitted to remove

this requirement, however until the amendment has been approved the condition is still in force.

Monitoring should therefore proceed as required until the request is formally approved by the

Department (WMCO, July 2015).

The fence on the North-Eastern side of the site has been damaged. The fence should be repaired

before it is completely degraded (WMCO, July 2015).

Further to the legal compliance issues, observations were also raised where there is a possibility to improve

on the environmental practises. These are not legal requirements and ArcelorMittal should investigate the

feasibility of implementation in context with the current situation and available resources. The following

observations were made;




The amendment application submitted for the new remediation plan and EMP must be followed up

with the department to ensure the remediation process can proceed timeously. It is recommended that

a meeting be set up with DEA in order to present the updated remediation plan and EMP as this is a

substantial amendment (WMCO, July 2015).




Contents

1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 6

2. BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................................ 6

3. AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR TECHNICAL SCOPE ......................................................................... 6

4. PART 1: AUDIT INFORMATION................................................................................................................ 10

4.1. Date of Audit........................................................................................................................................... 10

4.2. Audit Criteria / Scope of Work ................................................................................................................ 10

4.3. Audit Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 10

4.4. Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 11

4.5. Comments from previous audit reports .................................................................................................. 12

4.6. Declaration ............................................................................................................................................. 13

5. PART 2: AUDIT FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................ 14

5.1. Positive observations/findings ................................................................................................................ 14

5.2. Compliance to the License conditions ................................................................................................... 14

5.3. Authorisation conditions ......................................................................................................................... 15

6. GROUND WATER MONITORING DATA .................................................................................................. 32

7. GAS AND AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA ........................................................................................ 38

8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 39




1. INTRODUCTION

Zantow Environmental Consulting Services CC was appointed by ArcelorMittal to conduct an independent

compliance audit on its WML (License Nr 12/9/11/L130/3) for the decommissioning of the Klip Waste Site in

terms of condition 7.2.1 of the WML issued on the 10th March 2010.

The compliance audit entailed a site visit and a document audit. Compliance was verified with every condition

in the license and the monitoring data assessed and interpreted.

2. BACKGROUND

The Klip Waste Site at ArcelorMittal in Vereeniging is located in the Duncanville Industrial Area close to the

Klip River. The Site was used for the disposal of various waste streams (scrap metal, tar, pitch, oxidised slag,

builder’s rubble, sludge, phenolic effluent and ash) from the early 1950’s to approximately 1990. A phenol dam

was located on top of the Site, which was used to dispose effluent from the Gas Plants at the Klip and Vaal

Works, as well as liquid effluent from the Vanadium Recovery Plant.

Access to the site is restricted by means of a fence and a security gate. The fenced-off area covers

approximately 30 hectares, although the waste body only covers an area of approximately 9 hectares. The

crest of the waste body is some 9 m above natural ground level on the eastern side and the waste body is

located within the floodplain of the Klip River. Existing slopes are typically 1:2.5 and are generally stable,

although one localized area of instability was noted where a gulley has formed towards the Klip River. The

slope at the river side was noted to be very steep.

The site is surrounded by industrial activities and the residential area of Three Rivers is located to the east of

the Site. A building located adjacent to the Site is used by a fishing club for occasional meetings. The

remediation of the Klip waste site commenced in 2012 with the removal of tar waste to an off-site hazardous

landfill site. Since the removal of the hazardous waste the facility re-assessed the remediation plans and

proposes changes to the remediation plan. An amendment application has been submitted in 2013. All

remediation work was placed on hold until such time as the proposed remediation plan can be resolved with

the authorities.

3. AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR TECHNICAL SCOPE

A detailed baseline site assessment was done of the site to determine the impact in 2001. It was

demonstrated that the subsurface conditions at the site have been impacted by numerous inorganic

constituents that originated from the Vanadium Plant effluent that was stored in the phenol dam between 1990

and 1991.

Following the baseline assessment, various remediation options were investigated and the preferred

remediation option determined. An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was completed in 2006 in terms

of the National Environmental Management Act (No.107 of 1998) for the closure and remediation of the site.

A WML was subsequently issued by the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) on the 10th f March 2010.

Since the completion of the baseline assessments (2001) and the EIA (2006), a significant time period has

passed. Subsequent monitoring and additional studies commissioned by ArcelorMittal painted a different

picture of the current status of the site compared to the site conditions found more than a decade ago. The

Tar dumps were also removed from site and disposed at a licensed hazardous waste site in 2012. This

prompted ArcelorMittal to appoint Dr Willie van Niekerk from Infotox (Pty) Ltd to conduct a follow up site

characterization to determine if the initial remediation plans were still relevant and the best possible and

practical solution.

The investigations were conducted on the premise that it was likely that site conditions would have changed

during the last ten years since the Jones & Wagener assessment in 2001. Firstly, some proportion of water-

soluble compounds would have dissolved in rain water and would have been dispersed and diluted in

groundwater and surface water away from the site. Secondly, some of the organic compounds would have




biodegraded further since 2001 and concentrations in the soil and groundwater were expected to have

decreased.

Analytical data of samples collected by Georem confirmed that organic contaminant concentrations decreased

since the early Jones & Wagener (2001) investigations, which supported the understanding of Infotox. It was

concluded that Phenol had degraded and was no longer of concern in the groundwater. Similarly, it was

confirmed that the alkyl phenols had biodegraded to insignificant levels. Average Naphthalene levels were

found to be low, suggesting significant biodegradation over time. These results placed a new perspective on

the contaminant profile of the phenol dam, as well as other areas associated with coal tar. A ground water

conceptual model was also developed for the first time to better understand the finding’s and is in line with the

conclusions and recommendations made by Infotox during 2012 & 2013.

The latest specialist studies concluded that no in situ capping in the form of a liner is needed. The monitoring

results confirmed that the contamination has over the last decade reduced significantly and is no longer of

concern. From a health and environmental perspective it was argued that the waste site can be left as is.

From a duty of care perspective, ArcelorMittal decided that a minimum liner would be installed on the site after

the shaping is completed in line with NEMA’s precautionary approach principal and from an aesthetic point of view.

The information was consolidated and an updated Remediation Plan and Environmental Management

Program for the remediation of the Klip Waste Disposal Site were developed. ArcelorMittal submitted an

amendment application in July 2013 for the closure of the site. The department acknowledged the receipt of

the application but has not made a final decision.

The facility requested amendment to the following conditions as follows;

Condition

Number

Condition as written in the current

authorisation Proposed condition

1.1.1

The License authorises the

decommissioning and remediation of the

Klip Waste Disposal Site on Portion 68

of the farm Klipplaatdrift 601 IQ in

Vereeniging, Gauteng (hereinafter

referred to as “the Site”) according to the Environmental Impact Report:

Remediation of Klip Waste Site,

Vereeniging (Report Number:

JW176/06/A707) and the Environmental

Management Plan (Report Nr

JW168/07/B461) by Jones and Wagner

Consulting Engineers, dated October

2006 and November 2007 respectively,

and (herein after referred to as “the Reports”) and, the Record of Decision, issued by the Gauteng Department of

Agriculture and Rural Development

dated 8 August 2007, submitted by the

proposed License Holder.

The License authorises the decommissioning and

remediation of the Klip Waste Disposal Site on Portion

68 of the farm Klipplaatdrift 601 IQ in Vereeniging,

Gauteng (hereinafter referred to as “the Site”) according to the amended Remediation Plan and Environmental

Management Plan, dated July 2013 by Zantow

Environmental Consulting Services.”




Condition

Number



1.1.2

The location of the site shall be

according to the co-ordinates indicated

on the permit application Form and

reports submitted by the License Holder

which is defined as follows;

The location of the site shall be according to the co-

ordinates indicated on the permit application Form and

reports submitted by the License Holder which is defined

as follows;

Corner S E

A 26°39’5.25” 27°57’23.95”

B 26°39’2.04” 27°57’15.32”

C 26°39’3.97” 27°57’13.52”

D 26°39’3.32” 27°57’11.03”

E 26°39’23.01” 27°57’55.27”

F 26°39’30.42” 27°57’54.25”

G 26°39’31.14” 27°57’55.04”

H 26°39’26.97” 27°57’14.35”

I 26°39’19.68” 27°57’14.65”

J 26°39’19.83” 27°57’19.50”

3.1

The License and the EMP (Report No.

JW168/07.B461), compiled by Jones

and Wagner dated November 2007, is

binding and must be updated at all

times to ensure it’s relevant. Substantial

changes must be approved by the

Director.

The License and the EMP (Report No. JW168/07.B461),

compiled by Zantow Environmental Consulting Services,

dated July 2013, is binding and must be updated at all

times to ensure it is relevant. Substantial changes must

be approved by the Director

3.3

Closure and rehabilitation must be

carried out under the supervision of a

registered Professional Engineer

appointed by the License Holder and

according to the approved engineering

drawing numbers A720-00-001, A720-

00-002, A720-00-003, A720-00-004,

A720-00-005 and A720-00-006,

prepared by Jones and Wagner

Consulting Engineers dated April 2006.

(Annexure VI hereafter)

Closure and rehabilitation must be carried out under the

supervision of a registered Professional Engineer

appointed by the License Holder and according to the

approved engineering drawing numbers

klip24-06-2013,

0710-07355-100001-001. 0710-07355-100001-002.

0710-07355-100001-003. 0710-07355-100001-004.

(Annexure VI hereafter)

3.7

The license holder must construct

seepage collection trenches between

the site toe and the Klip River to

address movement of pollution plumes

to the river.

Delete

6.6.1

The License Holder must maintain gas

monitoring test pits VOC-01: South

Western boundary of the site

(downwind) and VOC-02: North eastern

boundary of the site (upwind) and the

concentration by volume in air at

Standard Temperature and Pressure, of

flammable gas and carbon dioxide shall

Delete




Condition

Number



not exceed 1% and 0.5% respectively in

the test pits.

6.6.2

Gas monitoring must be conducted

monthly from the date of this license for

a period of two years and thereafter

send the results to the Director for

determination of monitoring frequency if

further required.

Delete

8.3

Records demonstrating compliance with

condition 2.1 and any other records

required by this License must be

maintained and be made available on

request.

Records demonstrating compliance with condition 8.1

and any other records required by this License must be

maintained and be made available on request.

12.1

The site or any portion thereof, including

the surface of the site, must be covered

and the site must be maintained that no

objects or material including facilities

and old machinery which may hamper

the remediation of the site, are present.

The site or any portion thereof, including the surface of

the site, must be remediated according to the final

remediation plan and the site must be maintained that

no objects or material including facilities and old

machinery which may hamper the remediation of the

site, are present.

12.2.3

Operation and maintenance of the

landfill gas control system whereby gas

monitoring by the license holder as

described by condition 6.6 must

continue after closure for a period of two

years or such time longer as determined

by the Director. Should the atmospheric

levels be between 0.1% and 1% during

remediation measures a higher

monitoring frequency should be

installed. Should levels be above 1%

the license holder must submit

contingency plans regarding

occupational safety to the director. This

must be implemented after approval.

Delete

12.4

The temporary lined facility to be used

for dewatering of phenolic waste must

be in use for the period of remediation of

the site which must not exceed three

years.

Delete

12.5

The license holder must not use

condition 12.4 above as a means to

authorise the said facility for other

purposes in future. There shall be no

authorisation for extension of

timeframes and change of use for the

said facility without the license holder

having to start the process of licensing

from the beginning.

Delete

12.7 The License Holder must submit an end

use plan to the Director within six (6)

The end use plan indicate the site will be used in future

as a brown field site with certain portions earmarked for




Condition

Number



months of being issued with this

License.

industrial and or commercial use dependant on the

relevant approval(s) from the municipal council and or

any other department.

13.12

All hazardous material (waste and

contaminated soil) must be treated with

lime and be ash blended prior to being

sent to a licensed H:H landfill for

disposal.

All hazardous material (waste and contaminated soil)

that is to be removed as identified in the amended

rehabilitation plan, must be sent to a licensed H:H

landfill for disposal and treated if so required by that

facilities license.

Annexure III (a) Monitor at bi-annual intervals….

(b) Monitor at quarterly intervals…

(a) Monitor at bi-annual intervals during remediation and annually thereafter ….

(b) Monitor at quarterly intervals during remediation and annually thereafter…

Annexure VI

Reference to site layout plans

A720-00-001, A720-00-002

A720-00-003, A720-00-004

A720-00-005, A720-00-006

Reference to site layout plans

klip24-06-2013,

0710-07355-100001-001. 0710-07355-100001-002.

0710-07355-100001-003. 0710-07355-100001-004.

The remediation efforts on site are currently on hold until the amendment application has been resolved. It is

recommended that ArcelorMittal arrange a meeting with the Department in order to resolve and finalise the

amendment application.

4. PART 1: AUDIT INFORMATION

4.1. Date of Audit

External Audit date: - 13th of May 2015

Report date - 4th of June 2015

4.2. Audit Criteria / Scope of Work

The scope of work entailed conducting a compliance audit to verify compliance to the WML conditions.

The following documents and or information were considered against which compliance to the conditions of

the WML was audited:

WML

Approved Remediation Plan

Approved Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

Amendment application and the updated EMP and Remediation plan

Various database monitoring results made available / presented during the audit

Monitoring reports / data

Procedures and the electronic Environmental Management System (EMS)

Relevant communications between ArcelorMittal, Authorities and I & APs

Applicable South African Environmental Legislation.

4.3. Audit Methodology

The compliance status has been assessed for every condition of the WML and ranked as follows;




Compliance

Full compliance achieved with documented or audited proof of compliance available. No further actions are

required.

Non-compliance

Non-compliance is the most severe type of finding. A non-compliance will indicate legal non-compliance to the

relevant legislation, license and/or records of decisions conditions. Where appropriate the audit report could

contain recommendations regarding non-compliance and specified/agreed target dates for the

implementation.

Potential or partial non-compliance

A potential or partial non-compliance refers to a deviation from a legal requirement, a standard specification,

or a planned arrangement which does not constitute a non-compliance, but which does not represent Best

Practice. It can also refer to conditions which is partially complied with which the compliance with a condition

is out of the license holders control, for instance where a response is required by an authority etc.

Recommendations could be stated for potential non-compliances. It can also refer to conflicting of nonsensical

conditions in a license that cannot be complied with, but still needs to be resolved.

Observation

An observation refers to a deviation from best practice and includes observations of opportunities for

improvement. Recommendations could be stated for observations but will not have specified target dates.

This has been included for the benefit of management and while not being of immediate priority, can be

included in the self-improvement cycle of environmental management.

It was considered necessary to rank the identified non-compliance in terms of the following criteria:

Critical Issues

There is a critical failure against legal requirements or management response that presents an

immediate or significant risk that could result in prosecution and /or adverse legal finding due to failure

to meet regulatory requirements;

Could result in immediate injury or serious injury or environmental harm;

Could result in prolonged business outage; and/or

Could result in serious damage to the project’s reputation. Critical issues must be addressed immediately and all activities resulting in negative critical findings

must cease until such time as the issue has been rectified.

Moderate Issues

There is a substantial failure to meet the environmental requirements for the project or license

condition,

There is a possibility of substantial environmental degradation and/or pollution and/or

Objective evidence was observed raising doubt as to the integrity of data or records inspected.

Minor Issues

Isolated observations demonstrating that full compliance to the environmental requirements on site

have not been, or will not be, fully achieved.

No physical environmental harm

4.4. Objectives

To carry out an independent compliance audit including:




Inspection of operations and confirm compliance to the Authorisation

Verify the effectiveness of impact management and mitigation.

Assess allocations of responsibilities and actions.

Report observations for further investigation and action.

Specifically state whether conditions are adhered to.

Make recommendations where appropriate.

Prepare an audit report for submission to the relevant authorities.

4.5. Comments from previous audit reports

Recommendations from previous audits Status or comments

A notice board in three languages has been placed at the entrance to the site. The notice did not stipulate alternative disposal sites.

During the site visit, the notice board was inspected and indicated that the nearest municipal landfill site is the preferred alternative disposal site.

The EC, P-Alkalinity, F-, Phenol & TDS are not

included in the SANAS Schedule of Accreditation

for the Internal ArcelorMittal laboratory. It is

recommended that the use of alternative laboratory

be investigated or alternatively to include the

accreditation of the elements.

No change has occurred since the previous audit.

Tests for organics, including Phenol as scheduled to be done in April 2014, this is to be verified with the next external audit due in 2015.

At time of the audit, it was established that the organisation has started in 2014 to conduct quarterly analysis of organic elements at various boreholes.

ArcelorMittal indicated they had problems in contracting the registered vendor for the repair of the boreholes. The facility is in process to register another vendor to complete the work.

When on site, a contractor was also locating the boreholes to unblock the non-functional units, install lockable caps and put poles to clearly mark the respective boreholes. The contractor started with the repairs on the 27

th of May 2015.

During the site visit the boreholes had lockable caps on.

At the time of the audit not all of the boreholes had lockable installed, indicating that it had been stolen. As stated above, the contractor started to install caps on the 27

th of May 2015.

Organic elements are not monitored at the required frequency. The sampling and analysis must be re-assessed in terms of the license and the required elements be monitored as required until an agreement is reached with the authorities to amend the condition.

At time of the audit, it was established that the organisation started in 2014 to conduct quarterly analysis of organic elements at various boreholes as seen in Appendix B. However, it was established that groundwater quality was not monitored for TOCs for the third quarter of the 2014 reporting period. It is recommended that once the contractor has repaired the boreholes, monitoring of all required elements must continue at the required frequency.

No gas monitoring is undertaken as required. Even though an amendment application has been submitted to remove this requirement, the condition is still in force. Monitoring should therefore proceed as required until the request is formally approved by the department.

No change has occurred since the previous audit

The Tar was not treated with lime of ash before disposed to an H:H facility as required in the WML. ArcelorMittal stated that the contractor, EnviroServ stated they can accept the material as is according to their license. It is recommended that the relevant information be obtained from the contractor and

The information has not been obtained from Enviroserv yet. It should be stated that no hazardous waste was treated or deposed of to an H:H facility during this reporting period.




Recommendations from previous audits Status or comments

filed as proof.

4.6. Declaration

I, Trevor Hallatt, as an independent consultant compiled this audit report and declare that it correctly reflects

the findings made at the time of the audit. I further declare that I,

Act as an independent consultant; Do not have any financial interest in the undertaking of the activity, other than remuneration for the work performed in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act107 of 1998) and the National Environmental Management Waste Act; Undertake to disclose, to the competent authority, any material information that has or may have the potential to influence the decision of the competent authority or the objectivity of any report, plan or document required in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998); Based on information provided to me by the project proponent, and in addition to information obtained during the course of this study, will present the results and conclusion within the associated document to the best of my professional judgement.

_____________________________

Trevor Hallatt

Environmental Specialist




5. PART 2: AUDIT FINDINGS

5.1. Positive observations/findings

Overall the site is well managed and it is clear ArcelorMittal environmental management want to solve

problems and mitigate the environmental impacts. It is clear ArcelorMittal has proactively engaged with the

authorities to resolve issues relating to compliance to the authorisation.

Additional studies were instituted to better understand the site and the ground water conceptual model

developed for the first time.

5.2. Compliance to the License conditions

ArcelorMittal is generally compliant to the conditions of the WML (License Nr 12/9/11/L130/3) dated March

2010. The non-compliances observed with the license conditions mainly relate to the borehole monitoring

requirements and to a lesser extent to some operational controls. The remediation efforts have been placed

on hold until the proposed changes in the remediation plan is approved by the department.

Table 1 addresses compliance to each relevant condition in the license.

5.3. Authorisation conditions

Table 1: Audit results

Condition Nr

Condition in WML Observation / Comments Compliance status Intensity of non-compliance

1.1 Site Details

1.1.1

The License authorises the decommissioning and remediation of the Klip Waste Disposal Site on Portion 68 of the farm Klipplaatdrift 601 IQ in Vereeniging, Gauteng (hereinafter referred to as “the Site”) according to the Environmental Impact Report: Remediation of Klip Waste Site, Vereeniging (Report Number: JW176/06/A707) and the Environmental Management Plan (Report Nr JW168/07/B461) by Jones and Wagner Consulting Engineers, dated October 2006 and November 2007 respectively, and (herein after referred to as “the Reports”) and, the Record of Decision, issued by the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development dated 8 August 2007, submitted by the proposed License Holder.

The remediation process has been put on hold and the remediation plan was updated. An amendment application was submitted in August 2013 to amend the condition accordingly.

The remediation plans was followed to date.

The amendment application must first be approved by DEA before the implementation of the new plan may commence.

Compliant Observation

1.1.2

The location of the site shall be according to the co-ordinates indicated on the permit application Form and reports submitted by the License Holder which is defined as follows;

The coordinates specified in the Waste License is correct.

ArcelorMittal however requested that the coordinate system be changed to the geographical coordinate system in line with the system used in the final design drawings for ease of reference.

Compliant




Condition Nr


1.3. Site management

1.3.1.

The closure and rehabilitation activities must be managed and operated:

(i) In accordance with a site closure and rehabilitation plan that inter alia identifies and minimises risk of pollution, indicating those arising from construction, maintenance, accidents, incidents and non-conformances and those drawn to the attention of the licence holder as a result of compliance.

(ii) By sufficient persons who are compliant in respect to the responsibilities to be undertaken by them in connection with the operation of activities

Activities completed to date were managed in accordance with this condition. ArcelorMittal appointed a third party contractor to excavate and remove the tar. The contractor was supplied with a copy of the EMP and the license.

The remediation process has been put on hold and the remediation plan was updated.

Compliant

1.3.2.

Any persons having duties that are or may be affected by the matters set out in this licence must have access to a copy which must be kept at or near the place where the duties are carried out. A copy of this licence may be published on any website deemed fit by the Department

The license is held at the Environmental Management Department. A copy was supplied to the head of security responsible for safety and access control on site.

Compliant

2. Emergency preparedness plan

2.1.

The licence holder must maintain and implement an n emergency preparedness plan and review it after every two years and after every emergency and/or major accident. The plan must among others include:

(a) Fire

(b) Natural disasters such as floods,

(c) Uncontrolled gas emissions

The procedure is an integrated plan and addresses the items required as well as additional potential emergency conditions.

The revision available at the time of the audit was dated 28/02/2014 and should only be reviewed in 2016.

Compliant




Condition Nr


3. Commissioning and construction of remediation measures

3.1

The licence and the EMP (Report No. JW 168/07/B461, compiled by Jones and Wagener dated November 2007) is binding and must be updated at all times to ensure that it is relevant. Substantial changes must be approved by the Director.

The removal of the tar was in line with the remediation plan prepared by Jones and Wagner plan.

The implementation of the remediation plan was placed on hold. ArcelorMittal updated and changed the remediation plan and EMP and therefore submitted and amendment application to amend this condition.

Implementation of the new updated plans may only commence once the approval has been obtained.

Compliant

3.2

The site or any portion thereof must be maintained in such a way that:

The formation of pools due to rain is prevented Free surface runoff of rain water is ensured Contamination of storm water is prevented No objects or material which may hamper the rehabilitation of the site are present No erosion must occur after rehabilitation Re-vegetating of the area with indigenous plants is achieved

The requirements have been included in the final remediation plans that were submitted to DEA for amendment. The auditor is of the opinion that this condition talks to the desired end state after remediation has been completed. The condition is therefore not currently applicable.

Not yet Applicable

3.3.

Closure and rehabilitation construction must be carried out with supervision of a registered Professional Engineer appointed by the Licence Holder and according to the approved engineered drawings numbered A720-00-001; A720-00-002; A720-00-003; A720-00-004; A720-00-005; A720-00-006, prepared by Jones and Wagener Consulting Engineers dated April 2006.

The implementation of the remediation plan was placed on hold. ArcelorMittal updated and changed the final designs and therefore submitted and amendment application to amend this condition.

Implementation of the new updated plans may only commence once the approval has been obtained.

Not yet applicable

3.4.

Port closure maintenance within the site must be carried out in accordance with recognised civil engineering practice with special consideration to stability under the leadership of a registered Professional Engineer.

The condition is not yet applicable. Not yet applicable




Condition Nr


3.5.

Should any archaeological artifacts be exposed during excavation, the construction in the vicinity of the finding must be stopped. Under no circumstances shall any artifacts be Destroyed. Such an archaeological site must be marked and fenced off and the South African Heritage Resource Agency must be contacted within 48 hours.

The condition is noted. No items were found during the excavation phase. The contractor was made aware of this requirement.

Compliant

3.6.

Drainage systems must be constructed and maintained by the License Holder to ensure that runoff water does not enter the water body during decommissioning.

The condition is not applicable yet. Not yet applicable

3.7. The licence holder must construct seepage collection trenches between the site toe and the Klip River to address movement of pollution plumes to the river.

The implementation of the remediation plan was placed on hold. ArcelorMittal updated and changed the remediation plan and therefore submitted and amendment application to delete this condition.

Not yet applicable

3.8. The Licence Holder shall make provision for sanitation facilities on site in line with the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act S5 of 1993).

No activities currently on site and therefore no sanitation facilities on site.

Not yet applicable

4. Access Control

4.1.

Weatherproof, durable and legible notices in at least three official languages applicable in the area must be displayed at each entrance to the site. These notices must prohibit unauthorized entry, disposal of waste on the site and state the alterative place for disposal. Signs must have the name, address and telephone number of the License Holder and the person responsible for the site.

Site notice boards were noted at the access gate during the site inspection. The board indicated that the nearest municipal waste disposal site is the alternative site for disposal.

Compliant

4.2. The site must be fenced to a minimum height of 1,8 metres with gates of the same height at all entrances, to reasonably prevent unauthorised entry.

The fence was verified on site. However, the fence on the North-Eastern side of the site has been compromised and should be repaired before it is completely degraded.

Partial compliance Minor

5. Health and safety




Condition Nr


5.1. The License Holder must ensure adequate fire breaks and implement fire control measures.

Fire breaks were observed on site. Roads have been established on the site and are used as firebreaks.

Compliant

5.2.

The License Holder must take all reasonable steps to ensure the health and safety of workers and employees on site, in terms of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993).

A detailed HIRA was completed before the excavation work completed on site.

Compliant

5.3.

In order to curb negative environmental impact, the License Holder must make sure that serviceable ablution facilities are available for personnel who will be responsible for monitoring, maintenance and rehabilitation of the site.

No activities are currently undertaken on site and therefore there are no need for ablution facilities.

Compliant

6. Monitoring

6.1. Monitoring methods and parameters

6.1.1.

The License Holder must carry out all tests required in terms of this license in accordance with methods prescribed by and obtainable from the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), referred, to in the Standards Act, 1982 (Act 30 of 1982).

The internal laboratory at Vanderbijlpark Works operations is accredited and the external Laboratory, M&L Inspectorate as well.

The internal laboratory is however not accredited for all the required elements.

Partial-compliance Moderate

6.2. Water monitoring

6.2.1.

The Licence Holder must undertake monitoring in accordance with the specified borehole network for the site. The specified monitoring boreholes for the site are geographically located as follows:

At the time of the audit, it was established that some of the monitoring borehole, including KBH 5, was damaged/blocked and the organisation has commissioned a contractor to repair the damaged boreholes. During the audit, a contractor was locating the boreholes to unblock the non-functional units, install lockable caps and put poles to clearly mark the respective boreholes. The contractor started with work on the 27

th of May 2015. However monitoring at all the established

boreholes did not place during the reporting period of 2014. The WMCO indicated that monitoring from the repaired borehole will commence in the 2015 reporting period.

Partial-compliance Minor




Condition Nr


6.2.2.

License Holder must establish three additional sets of shallow, and deep aquifer monitoring boreholes on the south- eastern and southern side of the site and downstream of the tar deposit within 6 month of the date of this license accordingly and to the satisfaction of the Director and the Chief Director RPW so that unobstructed sampling, m required in terms of this license, can be undertaken.

The required boreholes were drilled by Afric Manzi and a report to this effect was made available to the auditor. At the time of the audit it was established that KBH 7D and KBH 8D were blocked. No monitoring took place at KBH 7D for the first, third and fourth quarters of the 2014 reporting period. Additionally, monitoring was not conducted at KBH 8D for the last quarter of the 2014 reporting period. However, the organisation has commissioned a contractor to repair the damaged boreholes and started with work on the 27

th of May

2015. The organisation is partially compliant to the condition because monitoring did not take place at the blocked boreholes at the required frequencies during the 2014 reporting period. The WMCO indicated that they will commence with monitoring in the first quarter of the 2015 reporting period.


6.2.3.

Monitoring boreholes must be equipped with lockable caps. The Department of Water Affairs (DWA) reserves the right to take water samples at any time and to analyze these samples, or to have them taken and analyzed

Not all of the boreholes observed during the site visit had lockable caps on. However, the organisation has commissioned a contractor to repair the damaged boreholes and started with the repairs on the 27

th of May 2015.


6.2.4.

Groundwater monitoring by the License Holder, in accordance with conditions 6.2.1, must, continue and be maintained for a period of 30 years after closure, or for such a period and/or frequency as approved by the Chief

Noted Partial-compliance




Condition Nr


Director: RPW.

6.2.5. The license holder must establish two upstream boreholes monitoring the shallow and deep aquifers.

The required boreholes were drilled by Afric Manzi and a report to this effect was made available to the auditor.

Compliant

6.2.6. The license holder must ensure that the boreholes referred to in condition 6.2.5 above are hydraulically linked with corresponding downstream boreholes.

The ground water specialist confirmed that the aquifer is linked and the upstream boreholes is indicative to background levels

Compliant

6.3. Background Monitoring

6.3.1.

Samples from the boreholes indicated above, where the groundwater in the borehole is at an expected higher hydraulic pressure level as the hydraulic pressure level of fire groundwater under the site, shall be considered as background monitoring. Background groundwater monitoring must be conducted during each monitoring occasion in terms of condition 6.4 or 6.5 for the water quality variables listed in Annexure II or Annexure III.

At the time of the audit, it was established that monitoring has not been conducted at all of the required boreholes. It is recommended that once the contractor has repaired the boreholes, monitoring of all required elements must continue at all of the boreholes at the required frequency.


6.4. Detection Monitoring

6.4.1.

Monitoring must be conducted bi-annually for all water quality variables listed in paragraph (a) of Annexure III and quarterly for the variables listed in paragraph (b) of Annexure III at locations specified in condition 6.2.1 or such frequency as is may be determined by the Chief Director: RPW.

At time of the audit, it was established that the organisation started in 2014 to conduct quarterly analysis of organic elements at various boreholes as seen in Appendix B. However, it was established that groundwater quality has not been monitored for TOCs for the third quarter (November 2014) of the 2014 auditing period. It is recommended that once the contractor has repaired the boreholes, monitoring of all required elements must continue at the required frequency.

Partially compliant Minor

6.5. Investigating Monitoring

6.5.1

lf, in the opinion of Chief Director: RPW, a water quality variable listed under the detection monitoring program, as referred to in condition 6.4.1, shows an increasing trend, the License Holder must initiate monthly monitoring for all

Noted. No such request has been received to date. Compliant




Condition Nr


water quality variables listed in annexure II. l

6.6. Gas Monitoring

6.6.1.

The Licence Holder must maintain gas monitoring test pits VOG01: South western boundary of the site (downwind) and VOC -02 north-eastern boundaries of the site (upwind) and the concentration, by volume in air at Standard Temperature and Pressure, of flammable gas and carbon dioxide shall not exceed 1 % and 0.5 % respectively in the test pits.


The condition is however still in force whilst the amendment application is pending. ArcelorMittal conducted monitoring previously and concluded that the potential impact from gas emissions is negligible. Monitoring was therefore ceased.

Non-Compliance Minor

6.6.2.

Gas monitoring must be conducted monthly from the date of this license for a period of two years and thereafter send the results to the Director for determination of monitoring frequency if further required.


The condition is however still in force whilst the amendment application is pending. ArcelorMittal conducted monitoring previously and concluded that the potential impact from gas emissions is negligible. Monitoring was therefore ceased.

Non-Compliance Minor

6.7. Further Investigation

6.7.1. Water pollution

6.7.1.1.

lf, in the opinion of the Chief Director: RPW, groundwater and surface water pollution have occurred or may possibly occur during remediation the Licence Holder must conduct and/or appoint specialists to conduct the necessary investigations and implement additional

Monitoring and rehabilitation measures to the satisfaction of the Chief Director: RPW.

Noted. No such request has been received to date. Compliant

6.7.2. Environmental pollution




Condition Nr


6.7.2.1.

lf, in the opinion of the Director, environmental pollution, nuisances or health risks may be or is occurring, the License Holder must initiate an investigation into the cause of the of the problem or suspected problem. Such investigation must include the monitoring of the relevant environmental pollution, nuisance and health risk variables, at those monitoring points and such frequency to be determined in consultation with the Director.

Noted. No such request was received to date. Compliant

7. Auditing

7.1. Internal audits

7.1.1.

Internal audits must be conducted quarterly by the License Holder and on each audit occasion an official report must be compiled by the relevant auditor to report the findings of the audits and the report must be forwarded to the Director.

Quarterly audits are being conducted. The last quarterly audit was done in December 2015.

Compliant

7.2. External audits

7.2.1.

The Licence Holder must appoint an independent external auditor to audit the site annually and this auditor must compile an audit report documenting fire findings of his audit, which must be submitted by the Licence Holder according to condition 9.3 below.

The audit report must:

a.) specifically state compliance with regard to each licence condition;

b.) include an interpretation of all available data and test result regarding the operation of the site and all its impacts on the environment!

c.) specify target dates for the implementation of the recommendations by the Licence Holder

to achieve compliance;

d.) contain recommendations regarding noncompliance or

The previous external audit was completed in May 2014 and submitted to the Department. The report contained the required elements and was structured according to the requirements.

Compliant




Condition Nr


potential noncompliance and

must specify target dates for the implementation of the recommendations by the Licence Holder and whether corrective action taken for the previous audit non conformities was adequate;

e.) show monitoring results graphically and conduct trend analysis.

7.3. Audits and inspections

7.3.1.

The Department and the Department of Water Affairs (DWA) reserve the right to audit and/or inspect the site at any time and at such a frequency determined by the Director and Chief Director: RPW, or to have the site audited or inspected.

The Department (DEA) audited the Klip Site in 2012. Access was allowed for the department to conduct the audit. No response or enforcement action received to date

Compliant

7.3.2.

The License Holder must make any records or documentation available to the Director and Chief Director: RPW upon request, as well as any other information the Director and Chief Director RPW may require.

The Department (DEA) audited the Klip Site in 2012. Access was allowed for the department to conduct the audit and the relevant information was provided as requested during the inspection. No response or enforcement action has been received to date

Compliant

7.3.3.

The findings of these audits or inspections shall be made available to the License Holder within 60 days of the end of the audit or inspection. Information from the audits must be treated in accordance with the Promotion of Access to information Act 2010 (Act 2 of 2000).

The Department did not comply with this condition. No response or enforcement action received to date

Not applicable

8. Recording

8.1. The License Folder must keep a record of and update all the information referred to in Annexure V on an annual basis.

The records are attached to this audit report (see appendix B).

Compliant

8.2. The Licence Holder must record all borehole data and chemical analyses in the format depicted in Annexure IV

The ground water data is attached to this audit report (See annexure B and C).

Compliant




Condition Nr


8.3. Records demonstrating compliance with condition 2.1 and any other record required by this. License must be maintained and be made available on request.

An amendment application was submitted to amend the condition. ArcelorMittal is of the opinion that it requires an administrative correction – reference to the relevant section in the license that relates to “records”.

Compliant

9. Reporting

9.1.

The License Holder must, within 24 hours, notify the Director and Chief Director: RPW of the occurrence or detection of any incident on the site, or incidental to the remediation operation of the site, which has the potential to cause, or has caused further environmental pollution, water pollution, health risks or nuisance conditions.

No major incidents were recorded on site Compliant

9.2.

The License Holder must, within 14 days, or a shorter period of time, if specified by the Director and Chief Director: RPW, from the occurrence or detection of any incident refined to in mediation 9.1, submit an action plan, which must include a detailed this schedule, to the

satisfaction of the Director and Chief Director: RPW of measures taken to -

a.) connect the impact resulting from fire incident

b.) prevent the incident from causing any further impact; and

c.) Prevent a recurrence of a similar incident.;


9.3.

In the event that measures have not been implemented within 21 days of the incident to address impact caused by the incident refined to in condition g,1, or measures which have been implemented are inadequate, the Director and Chief Director: RPW may implement the Necessary measures at the cost and risk of the License Holder.


9.4. The License Holder must keep an incident report and complaints register, which must be made available to external, Departmental and DWA auditors for the purpose

No external complaints has been received to date Compliant




Condition Nr


of their audits.

9.5.

Records generated in terms of condition 6 above and any other records generated as a result of this Licence must be interpreted and included in the audit reports referred to in condition 7 above.

The ground water monitoring data is included in this report. Refer to attachment C and D.

Compliant

9.6.

Gas monitoring and water monitoring results as per conditions 6.6 and 6.2 respectively, must be recorded and trend analysis conducted and reported to the Director and the. Chief Director:' RPW if there is an indication of an upward trend.

Gas monitoring results are not recorded and therefore trend analysis is not taking place.

Water monitoring results are recorded and trend analysis is taking place (see section 6 of this report). Overall the groundwater is either stable or improving and reporting is therefore not required.


10. Leasing and alienation of the site

10.1.

Should the Licence Holder want to alienate or lease the site, he/she must notify the Director in writing of such an intention at least 120 days prior to the said transaction. Should the approval be granted, the subsequent Licence Holder shall remain liable to comply with all licence conditions specified herein.

The license has not been transferred and the major areas where the waste site is located are controlled by AMSA on a daily basis.

Compliant

11. Transfer of waste management licence

11.1.

Should the License Holder want to transfer holder-ship of this license, he/she must apply in terms of Section 52 of the National Environmental Management Waste Act, 2008 (Act No 59 of 2008).

There is no short or medium term plans to transfer the license.

Compliant

11.2. Any subsequent Licence Holder shall be bound by all the conditions specified in this Licence.

Not Applicable Not Applicable

12. Rehabilitation and closure of the site

12.1. The site or any portion thereof, including the surface of the site must be covered and the site must be maintained in such a way that no objects or materials including facility’s

The implementation of the remediation plan was placed on hold. ArcelorMittal updated and changed the remediation plan and therefore submitted an amendment application to

Compliant




Condition Nr


and old machinery which may hamper the rehabilitation of the site are present,

amend this condition.

The illegal scrap metal “miners” was successfully removed from site since the middle of 2012. The digging activities on site disturbed the sites surface. The site was graded flat in anticipation for future remediation work.

12.2. Rehabilitation and closure of the site must entail:

12.2.1. Management of vegetation in terms of species of vegetation planted adjacent to the fill areas and along property boundaries and implementation

This forms part of the remediation plan and is not yet applicable.

Not yet applicable

12.2.2. Protection of the cover from ponding water, drainage challenges, erosion and also providing adequate security to prohibit damage of the cover from settlements.


Not yet applicable

12.2.3.

Operation and maintenance of the landfill gas control system whereby gas monitoring by the License Holder as prescribed in condition 6.6 must continue after closure for a period of two years, or such longer period as may h determined by the Director. Should the atmospheric

Levels be between 0.1% and 1%, during remediation operations, a higher frequency of monitoring must be instituted. Should levels above 1% be detected, the License Holder must submit a contingency plan regarding occupational safety to the Director, which must be implemented on the Site, after written approval by the Director.

The implementation of the remediation plan was placed on hold. ArcelorMittal updated and changed the remediation plan and therefore submitted an amendment application to delete this condition.

Not yet applicable

12.2.4. Assurance by the license holder that the slope is not steeper than 1:4 (VIII).


Not yet applicable

12.3.

The License Holder must rehabilitate the site in accordance with the latest edition of the documents titled: "Minimum Requirements" and closure & rehabilitation plan approved by the Director.


Not yet applicable




Condition Nr


12.4 The temporarily lined facility to be used for the dewatering of phenolic waste must be in use for the period of the remediation of the site which must not exceed three years.


Not yet applicable

12.5.

The license holder must not use condition 12.4 above as a means to authorize the said facility for other purposes in future. There shall be no authorization for extension of timeframes and change of use for the said facility without the license holder having to start the process of licensing from the beginning.


Not yet applicable

12.6. The licence holder must classify waste from the site and dispose them at appropriate facilities,

The tar contaminated material was classified as hazardous waste and disposed therefore at an off-site H:H waste disposal site.

Compliant

12.7. The Licence Holder must submit an end-use plan to the Director within six month (6) months of being issued with this Licence.

An end use plan was submitted in September 2010.

An updated end use plan was submitted to DEA on the 31st

July 2013 that proposes to change the end use plan.

Compliant

12.8. Water from the waste body must be considered waste and the license holder must implement the waste hierarchy in dealing with the all waste streams.

No waste water is generated from the site. Not applicable

13. General

13.1 The commencement of the licensed activity may not begin within thirty (30) days of the date of signature of this licence.

Remediation only commenced in 2012. Compliant

13.2

Should you be notified by the Minister of a suspension of the license pending any appeals decision, you may not commence with the activities licensed unless you arc devised by the Minister in writing.

No appeal or suspension notices have been received. Compliant

13.3. After the appeal period has expired and no good cause to extend the appeal period has been submitted, the activity

A notice was submitted to the department prior to the commencement.

Compliant




Condition Nr


may commence provided a notice has been submitted to the Department. The notice must include a date on which it is anticipated that the activity will commence.

13.4.

The activity must commence within a period of two (2) years from the date of issue. If commencement of the activity does not occur within the said period, the license will lapse and a new application for a licensed must be made in order for the activity to be undertaken.

The remediation commenced in 2012 before the license lapsed.

Compliant

13.5.

lf the License Holder anticipates that the activity would extend beyond the two (21 year period, he / she must apply and show good cause for an extension of the license six (6) months prior to its expiry date.

Noted Compliant

13.6. The license shall not be transferable unless such transfer is suggest to condition 11.1

Noted Compliant

13.7.

This license shall not be construed as exempting the License Holder from compliance with the provisions of the National and Provincial Legislation and any relevant Ordinance, Regulation, By-laws and relevant National Standards and Norms.

Noted. ArcelorMittal receives regular updates on legislation changes and incorporates this into the EMS.

Compliant

13.8. Transgression of any condition. Of this license could result in the validity of the license being terminated by the Department.

Noted Not Applicable

13.9.

Non-compliance with any condition of this license may result in criminal prosecution or other actions provided for in terms of Section 67(1) of the National environmental Management - Waste Act, 2008.


13.10

Any committees appointed in terms of the application or any other public authority or organization shall not be held responsible for any damages or losses suffered by the License Holder or his/her successor in title in any instance where operations are to be temporary or permanently

No committee appointed Not Applicable




Condition Nr


stopped for reasons of non-compliance.

13.11

In terms of Section 28 and 30 of the National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998, and Section 19 and 20 of the National Water Act No. 36 of 199b, any costs incurred to remedy environmental damage must be borne by the person responsible for the damage. It is therefore imperative that the License Holder reads through and understand the legislative requirements pertaining to the project. It is the License Holder's responsibility to take reasonable measures which include informing and educating contraction and employees about environmental risks of their work and training them to operate in an environmental acceptable manner.

The license holder held a site meeting with the appointed contractor responsible to remove the tar material from site. The contractor was provided with the license and the EMP. Training was provided to the employees. Reasonable measures were therefore taken to inform and educate the responsible people of the requirements.

Compliant

13.12 All hazardous material (water and contaminated soil) must be treated with lime and be ash blended prior to being sent to a licensed H:H landfill for disposal.

The implementation of the remediation plan was placed on hold. ArcelorMittal updated and changed the remediation plan and therefore submitted an amendment application to amend this condition. The proof that the tar was acceptable to the H:H Landfill as is without treatment must be filed.

Compliant Observation

13.13 The Licence Holder shall be responsible for the site or its impacts on the environment post closure of the site.


14. Appeal of Licence

14.1. The licence holder must notify every registered interested and affected party, in writing and within five (5) days, of receiving the Departments’ decision.

The IAPs was notified on the license on the 24th March 2010.

The license is dated the 10th

March 2013 but ArcelorMittal only received the license later. The timeframe is therefore met.

Compliant

14.2. The notification referred to in 14.1 must:

14.2.1. Specify the date on which the license was issued;

14.2.2. Inform the registered interested and affected party of the appeal procedure provided for in Chapter 7 of the GN No. R385 of 21 April 2006 in terms of National Environmental

The notice contained the relevant information as required in the license

Compliant




Condition Nr


Management Act, 1998, as amended (see Annexure l).

14.2.3. Advise the interested and affected party that a copy of a license and reasons for the decision will be famished on request,

The notice contained the relevant information as required in the license

Compliant

6. GROUND WATER MONITORING DATA

An independent ground water specialist was appointed in 2012 to develop a ground water conceptual

model and also interpret the monitoring data to assess the Sulphate Migration Mechanism in the

groundwater system, and the potential impact thereof on the Klip River, based on existing groundwater-

related studies/data.

The conclusions and recommendations from the study are as follows;

Groundwater flow is predominantly to the east toward the Klip River at a very slow rate.

The sulphate impact on the Klip River is not detected due to the river flow volumes.

The aquifer will naturally attenuate slowly to achieve drinking water standards after approximately

250 years, provided that aquifers to the west of the site are not contaminated.

No groundwater remediation action is recommended.

Regular groundwater monitoring should continue at the Klip Waste Disposal Site.

The figure blow indicates the location of the required monitoring boreholes at the Klip Waste Disposal Site.

KHB-1 represents the “upstream” ground water quality and therefore the upstream borehole of the site.

Figure 1 Location of boreholes

6.1 Inorganic elements

The Infotox “Contaminated Site Investigations for the ArcelorMittal Klip Waste Disposal Site in Vereeniging” (Document No 003-2012 Rev 2.0) concluded that sulphates are the only real element of concern in the

ground water aquifer in terms of inorganic contamination.




Table 2: Summary of inorganic elements of concern (Infotox, 2012)

As seen in Table 2, sulphate levels exceeded the “limits” at all the downstream boreholes during the infotox

investigation. Ca, Mg, Na, Mn exceeded guideline values at certain boreholes but in varying degrees.

Sulphate is therefore used as the element to track improvement or deterioration in this assessment.

Figure 2 Up and downstream Electric Conductivity

As seen in Figure 2, Electrical Conductivity downstream of the site has increased since September 2013

which correlates with the increase of Sulphate levels measured at borehole KBH 4D. This is what can be

expected and is in line with the conclusion of the ground water specialist report that the sulphates will flush

out over time.

-300.0

200.0

700.0

1200.0

1700.0

2200.0

2700.0

3200.0

3700.0

4200.0

Ele

ctri

cal

con

du

ctiv

ity

Up and Down stream boreholes at Klip Waste Site

(electrical conductivity uS/cm)

KBH5 (upstream) KBH4D (downstream)




Figure 4 Sulphate Trend up and down stream of the location of the old phenolic dam

KBH 5 is upstream of the location where the phenolic dam was located and KBH-10 is located downstream

of the area. The effluent from the vanadium plant reportedly contained high levels of sulphates. From the

sulphate levels, however, it is clear that the phenolic dam had an impact on the Sulphate levels. The

sulphate levels upstream of the location of the phenolic dam area is on average approximately 560 mg/l

and downstream approximately 5 000 mg/l. It can also be seen in KBH 10 that the trend of the sulphate

level is downwards and therefore improving slowly over time. This confirms the ground water specialist

study’s conclusion that even though the aquifer is contaminated with Sulphate, the fact that the site is no

longer in use and therefore no additional contamination is added to the system; the natural attenuation will

resolve the situation over many years to come naturally.

0.0

1000.0

2000.0

3000.0

4000.0

5000.0

6000.0

7000.0

8000.0

Su

lph

ate

(m

g/L

)

Up and Downstream of the location of the old Phenolic Dam

KBH 5 (up stream) and KBH 10 (downstream) Sulphate

KBH5 KBH10D Linear (KBH10D)




Figure 5: Sulphate trend downstream of the Klip Waste Site

The monitoring results confirm the movement of the Sulphate contamination plume towards the Klip River.

KBH 3 and 4 is located closest to the River and best represents what reports to the Klip River currently.

The borehole shows an increased sulphate level trend over time. This is what can be expected and in line

with the conclusion of the ground water specialist that the Sulphates will flush out over time. The ground

water will seep into the Klip River system. The ground water specialist concluded that due to the slow

movement of the ground water and therefore the sulphate plume, the impact would be minimal on the

receiving river. The study concluded that the seepage of the sulphate in the Klip River would not impact on

the river quality as the volume of contamination entering the river compared to the volume of water in the

river and the flow would not be picked up.

0.0

500.0

1000.0

1500.0

2000.0

2500.08

-Au

g-0

7

20

-Au

g-0

8

1-J

un

-10

30

-Se

p-1

0

15

-No

v-1

0

13

-Ja

n-1

1

13

-Ja

n-1

1

7-M

ar-

11

25

-Ma

y-1

1

9-J

un

-11

28

-Se

p-1

1

4-O

ct-1

1

1-N

ov-1

1

16

-Ma

r-1

2

25

-Ju

n-1

2

25

-Ju

n-1

2

27

-Au

g-1

3

9-S

ep

-13

08

-No

v-1

3

06

-Fe

b-1

4

04

-Ap

r-1

4

08

-Au

g-1

4

13

-No

v-1

4

10

-Ma

r-1

5

Su

lph

ate

(m

g/l

) "Old" up and down stream boreholes at Klip Waste

Site Sulphate mg/l

KBH5 (up stream) KBH2 (downstream) KBH3D (downstream) KBH4D (downstream)




Figure 6 Sulphate trend downstream at the new boreholes (KBH 7D and 8D)

Figure 6 Sulphate trend downstream at the new boreholes (KBH 6D and 9D)

KBH 7 KBH 8 is located to the south of the site and it is clear that they are not in direct route of the plume

and therefore not contaminated significantly. These two boreholes are blocked and no monitoring data is

available for KBH 7D for the 1st quarter of 2015 and KBH 8D for end of 2014 and beginning 2015. As seen

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

400.0

450.0

500.0

Su

lph

ate

(m

g/l

)

"New" Up and Down stream boreholes at Klip

Waste Site Sulphate mg/l

KBH7D (upstream) KBH8D (downstream)

0.0

500.0

1000.0

1500.0

2000.0

2500.0

3000.0

3500.0

4000.0

Su

lph

ate

(m

g/l

)

"New" Up and Down stream boreholes at Klip

Waste Site Sulphate mg/l

KBH6D (upstream) KBH9D (downstream)




in Figure 6, KBH 9 is more contaminated than KBH6D indicating that the sulphates are still moving through

the system.

6.2 Organic ground water monitoring results

At time of the audit, it was established that the organisation has started in 2014 to conduct quarterly

analysis of organic elements in groundwater at various boreholes as seen in Appendix B. However, it was

established that the TOCs were not monitored in the third quarter of the 2014 reporting period and

monitoring did not take place at certain boreholes in the last quarter of the 2014 reporting period (See

Appendix B).

KBH 5 is upstream of the location where the phenolic dam was located and KBH-10 is located downstream

of the area. Additionally, the graph shows TOC results for KBH 6D (upstream) and 9D (downstream) of the

Southern section of the site. The total organic carbon was analysed for these boreholes and trended

below. The downstream boreholes show an increase in TOC.

Figure 7 Total Organic Carbon in groundwater

Table 3: Total organic carbon monitoring results (PPM)

Borehole 25-Apr-14 03-Sep-14 Dec-14 Mar-15

KBH 2 3.2

KBH 3S 25 32 73

KBH 3D 8.5 7.2 19

KBH 4S 22

KBH 4D 9 10 16

KBH 5D 25 19

KBH 6D (upstream) 8.4 9.1

KBH 7D 8.4 9.3

KBH 8D

9.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

25-Apr-14 03-Sep-14

TO

C (

PP

M)

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) up and downstream

of the Klip waste site

KBH 6D (up stream)

KBH 9D (downstream)

KBH 5D (upstream)

KBH 10D (downstream)




Borehole 25-Apr-14 03-Sep-14 Dec-14 Mar-15

KBH 9D (downstream)

10 13 30

KBH 10D (downstream)

49 37 70

KBH 10S 4.4

No volatile organic compounds except for Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate were detected during the reporting

period above the analytical method detection limits. Jones & Wagener (2001) detected trace

concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene in 2001, but these compounds are no longer present. It

must be noted that these compounds are common water contaminants associated with petroleum pollution

and Jones & Wagener (2001) also found these in upstream boreholes.

Because of the low guideline concentrations of some of the compounds, the analytical laboratory listed not

only the limits of quantification (LOQ) of the various compounds, but also estimates of the lowest detected

concentrations. Laboratory water blank was also analysed to provide perspectives on the level of

significance of observed concentrations close to the analytical method detection limits.

7. GAS AND AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA

ArcelorMittal commissioned some external studies historically. A detailed air quality assessment was

conducted by external specialists, Margot Saner & Associates. The specialist concluded based on the

monitoring results that the inhalation exposure to the measured ambient concentrations of the Volatile

organic Compounds (VOC’s) (whether acute or chronic) is very unlikely to cause any adverse health effects – even in particularly sensitive individuals).

The results obtained revealed that ambient concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene,

Trimethylbenzenes, Phenol and Cresols at all three of the sampling locations were well below the relevant

South African Ambient Air Quality Standard (Benzene) and/or the equivalent UK Environmental

Assessment Levels (UK EALs). Based on the results of this baseline study, the health risks associated with

acute and/or chronic inhalation exposure to the measured ambient contaminant concentrations at the Klip

Site waste site are minimal.

Table 3 Ambient concentrations of priority contaminants as measured by Margot Saner and Associates

Some testing was completed by ArcelorMittal in house in 2011, which confirmed the findings. The data can

however not be presented graphically as the elements were all below the detection limits of the laboratory

analysis methods.




8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ArcelorMittal appointed Zantow Environmental to conduct an external environmental audit to verify

compliance with the WML for the decommissioning of the Klip Waste Site. This is the fourth external report

in terms of the license condition. The facility addressed some of the recommendations made in the

previous audit but some recommendations made still require intervention by ArcelorMittal. The non-

compliances observed with the license conditions relate to mainly to borehole monitoring requirements and

to a lesser extent to some operational controls.

The following findings were raised and recommendations made to improve compliance to the WML;

Monitoring is not undertaken place at all the required boreholes as some of the boreholes have

been damaged and are blocked. It was reported that a contractor started on the 27th of May 2015

to repair blocked boreholes, issue each a lockable cap and establish poles to clearly mark the

respective boreholes. Once the boreholes have been repaired, monitoring must commence at the

required frequencies at all of the boreholes (WMCO, June 2015).

At the time of the audit it was reported that monitoring of organic elements commenced in 2014,

however TOC was not monitored in the third quarter of the 2014 reporting period. The sampling

and analysis must be re-assessed in terms of the license and the required elements must be

monitored as required until an agreement is reached with the authorities to amend the condition

(WMCO, July 2015).

No gas monitoring is undertaken as required. An amendment application was submitted to remove

this requirement, however until the amendment has been approved the condition is still in force.

Monitoring should therefore proceed as required until the request is formally approved by the

Department (WMCO, July 2015).

The fence on the North-Eastern side of the site has been damaged. The fence should be repaired

before it is completely degraded (WMCO, July 2015).

Further to the legal compliance issues, observations were also raised where there is a possibility to

improve on the environmental practises. These are not legal requirements and ArcelorMittal should

investigate the feasibility of implementation in context with the current situation and available resources.

The following observations were made;

The amendment application submitted for the new remediation plan and EMP must be followed up

with the department to ensure the remediation process can proceed timeously. It is recommended

that a meeting be set up with DEA in order to present the updated remediation plan and EMP as

this is a substantial amendment (WMCO, July 2015).

---End---




Appendix A

ANNUAL REPORT




APPENDIX B

Ground water monitoring results - organics

APPENDIX B1

Ground water monitoring results - organics (April 2014)

M and L Laboratory Services (Pty) Ltd

Registration Number 1974/001476/07 VATNumber 4780103505

P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 1 of 4

:

:

:

ML2014-0938

8464238

2014-04-25

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765

Golden No.Consulting Industrial Chemists, Analysts Samplers

CONFIDENTIAL

Certificate / Report

COMPANY NAME : ARCELOR MITTAL SA

ADDRESS : PO BOX 2 VANDERBIJLPARK 1900

SUBJECT : ANALYSIS OF 9 WATER SAMPLES

PROJECT REFERENCE :

:INSTRUCTED BY J. Mnisi

:ORDER NUMBER N/A

:RECEIVED ON 2014-04-04

:ANALYSIS COMPLETED 2014-04-25

* BDL - Below Detection Limit

* Denotes test method accredited to ISO17025

These tests do not apply to any other samples of a similar nature.

Refer to terms and conditions www.inspml.co.zaoo This report relates to only test items listed herein and analysis on an as received basis.

This certificate cannot be reproduced except in full without the written consent of M and L Laboratory Services (Pty) Ltd.o

:Printed Date 2014-04-25



P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 2 of 4

:

:

:

ML2014-0938

8464238

2014-04-25

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H03575

KBH-4D

H03574

QualityControlResultResult

KBH-6D


H03573

KBH-3D

Result

QualityControlResult

Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl

Method Total Organic Carbon by Calculation as (C) Reference

Total Organic Carbon as C(mg/l)

9.0 8.48.5

Authorised Signature

Supervisor

Edward Khumalo









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 3 of 4

:

:

:

ML2014-0938

8464238

2014-04-25

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H03578

KBH-9D

H03577


KBH-10D


H03576

KBH-7D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl



10 498.4


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 4 of 4

:

:

:

ML2014-0938

8464238

2014-04-25

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H03581

KBH-10S

H03580


KBH-5


H03579

KBH-3S

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl



4.4 2525


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo







P.O. Box 82124,

Southdale, 2135,

South Africa.

TEL. (011) 496-2228

FAX (011) 496-2239

Registration Number 1974/001476/07 Vat Number 4780103505

M and L Laboratory Services (Pty) Ltd Consulting Industrial Chemists, Analysts & Samplers

CONFIDENTIAL

Ref No.

: 8464238

Issued

at

: Johannesburg

Date

: 24/04/2014

Page : 1 of 4

COMPANY NAME : ARCELLOR MITTAL SOUTH AFRICA

ADDRESS : P.O BOX 2, VANDERBILJLPARK 1900


MARKED : AS BELOW

INSTRUCTED BY : J.MNISI

ORDER NO : TF

RECEIVED ON : 04/04/2014

LAB NO(S) : H03573-H03577

DATE ANALYSED : 18/04/2014

Analysis on as received basis:

Test: SVOC

Test Ref.: EPA 8270C & EPA 3510

LAB NUMBERS H03573 H03574 H03575 H03576 H03577

SAMPLE MARKS KBH-3D KBH-4D KBH-6D KBH-7D KBH-9D

Acenaphthene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Acenaphthylene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Anthracene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Azobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo(a)anthracene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo(a)pyrene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo(b)fluoranthene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo(k)fluoranthene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)

methane

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

Bis-(2-chloroethyl) ether BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl) ether BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Butyl benzyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Carbazole BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Chrysene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Di-n-butyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Di-n-octyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Dibenzofuran BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Diethyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Dimethyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Fluoranthene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Fluorene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

P.O. Box 82124,

Southdale, 2135,

South Africa.

TEL. (011) 496-2228

FAX (011) 496-2239



CONFIDENTIAL

Ref No.

: 8464238

Issued

at

: Johannesburg

Date

: 24/04/2014

Page : 2 of 4

LAB NUMBERS H03573 H03574 H03575 H03576 H03577

SAMPLE MARKS KBH-3D KBH-4D KBH-6D KBH-7D KBH-9D

Hexachlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Hexachlorobutadiene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Hexachlorocyclopentadiene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Hexachloroethane BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Isophorone BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Naphthalene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Nitrobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Pentachlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Phenanthrene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Phenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Pyrene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Chloronaphthalene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Chlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Methylnaphthalene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Methylphenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Nitroaniline BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Nitrophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4-Dichlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4-Dimethylphenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,6-Dinitrotoluene BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 3-Nitroaniline BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Bromophenylphenyl

ether

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Chloroaniline BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Chlorophenylphenyl

ether

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

4-Methylphenol BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Nitroaniline BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

SVOC – GC/MS Following Solvent Extraction Technique.

All Results Reported in (µg/l).

BDL – Below Detection Limit (50µg/l).

P.O. Box 82124,

Southdale, 2135,

South Africa.

TEL. (011) 496-2228

FAX (011) 496-2239



CONFIDENTIAL

Ref No.

: 8464238

Issued

at

: Johannesburg

Date

: 24/04/2014

Page : 3 of 4

COMPANY NAME : ARCELLOR MITTAL SA

ADDRESS : P.O BOX 2 VANDERBYLPARK SUBJECT


MARKED : AS BELOW

INSTRUCTED BY : J. MNISI

ORDER NO : TF

RECEIVED ON : 04/04/2014

LAB NO(S) : H03578-H03581

DATE ANALYSED : 19/04/2014

Analysis on as received basis:

Test: SVOC

Test Ref.: EPA 8270C & EPA 3510

LAB NUMBERS H03578 H03579 H03580 H03581

SAMPLE MARKS KBH-10D KHB-3S KBH-10S KBH5

Acenaphthene BDL BDL BDL BDL Acenaphthylene BDL BDL BDL BDL Anthracene BDL BDL BDL BDL Azobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo(a)anthracene BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo(a)pyrene BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo(b)fluoranthene BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo(k)fluoranthene BDL BDL BDL BDL Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)

methane

BDL BDL BDL BDL

Bis-(2-chloroethyl) ether BDL BDL BDL BDL Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl) ether BDL BDL BDL BDL Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL Butyl benzyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL Carbazole BDL BDL BDL BDL Chrysene BDL BDL BDL BDL Di-n-butyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL Di-n-octyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL Dibenzofuran BDL BDL BDL BDL Diethyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL Dimethyl phthalate BDL BDL BDL BDL Fluoranthene BDL BDL BDL BDL Fluorene BDL BDL BDL BDL

P.O. Box 82124,

Southdale, 2135,

South Africa.

TEL. (011) 496-2228

FAX (011) 496-2239



CONFIDENTIAL

Ref No.

: 8464238

Issued

at

: Johannesburg

Date

: 24/04/2014

Page : 4 of 4

LAB NUMBERS H03578 H03579 H03580 H03581

SAMPLE MARKS KBH-10D KHB-35 KBH-105 KBH5

Hexachlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL Hexachlorobutadiene BDL BDL BDL BDL Hexachlorocyclopentadiene BDL BDL BDL BDL Hexachloroethane BDL BDL BDL BDL Isophorone BDL BDL BDL BDL N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine BDL BDL BDL BDL Naphthalene BDL BDL BDL BDL Nitrobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL Pentachlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL Phenanthrene BDL BDL BDL BDL Phenol BDL BDL BDL BDL Pyrene BDL BDL BDL BDL 1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL 1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL 1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Chloronaphthalene BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Chlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Methylnaphthalene BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Methylphenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Nitroaniline BDL BDL BDL BDL 2-Nitrophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4-Dichlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4-Dimethylphenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 2,6-Dinitrotoluene BDL BDL BDL BDL 3-Nitroaniline BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Bromophenylphenyl ether BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Chloroaniline BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Methylphenol BDL BDL BDL BDL 4-Nitroaniline BDL BDL BDL BDL

SVOC – GC/MS Following Solvent Extraction Technique.

All Results Reported in (µg/l).

BDL – Below Detection Limit (50µg/l).




ANNEXURE B2

Ground water monitoring results – organics (September 2014)



P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 1 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


COMPANY NAME : ARCELORMITTAL SOUTH AFRICA

ADDRESS : P O BOX 2 VANDERBIJLPARK 1900

SUBJECT : analysis of 10 water samples

PROJECT REFERENCE :


:ORDER NUMBER











P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 2 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16956 E16957 E16958

Sample Marks KBH -3d KBH-3s KBH-4d

ResultDeterminand Result Result

Lab Number

Sampled Date

Chemical Analysis

Total Organic Carbon as C (mg/l) Subcontracted toAquadoc

1 7.2 32 10


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 3 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16956 E16957 E16958



Lab Number

Sampled Date

SVOC

Acenaphthene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Acenaphthylene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Anthracene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Azobenzene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Carbazole (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Chrysene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Dibenzofuran (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Fluorene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Hexachlorobenzene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Hexachlorobutadiene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Hexachloroethane (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Isophorone (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Nitrobenzene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Phenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

Pyrene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

2-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

2-Chlorophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

2-Nitrophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

2,4-Dichlorophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

2,4-Dimethylphenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

2,4-Dinitrotoluene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL










P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 4 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16956 E16957 E16958



Lab Number

Sampled Date

SVOC

4-Methylphenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL BDL BDL


Manager M&L Lab Services

Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 5 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16959 E16960 E16961

Sample Marks KBH-s KBH-5 KBH-6d


Lab Number

Sampled Date

Chemical Analysis


1 17 19 9.1


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 6 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16959 E16960 E16961



Lab Number

Sampled Date

SVOC



































P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 7 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16959 E16960 E16961



Lab Number

Sampled Date

SVOC




Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 8 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16962 E16963 E16964

Sample Marks KBH-7d KBH-8d KBH-9d


Lab Number

Sampled Date

Chemical Analysis


1 9.3 9.9 13


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 9 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16962 E16963 E16964



Lab Number

Sampled Date

SVOC



































P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 10 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16962 E16963 E16964



Lab Number

Sampled Date

SVOC




Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 11 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16965

Sample Marks KBH-10d

ResultDeterminand

Lab Number

Sampled Date

Chemical Analysis


1 37


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 12 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16965


ResultDeterminand

Lab Number

Sampled Date

SVOC

Acenaphthene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Acenaphthylene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Anthracene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Azobenzene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Carbazole (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Chrysene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Dibenzofuran (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Fluorene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Hexachlorobenzene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Hexachlorobutadiene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Hexachloroethane (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Isophorone (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Nitrobenzene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Phenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

Pyrene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2-Chloronaphthalene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2-Chlorophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2-Methylnaphthalene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2-Nitrophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2,4-Dichlorophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2,4-Dimethylphenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2,4-Dinitrotoluene (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 13 of 13

:

:

:

ML2014-2336

8555122

2014-09-03

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


Method

References

Detection

Limit

E16965


ResultDeterminand

Lab Number

Sampled Date

SVOC

4-Methylphenol (ug/l) EPA 8270C 50 BDL



Joanne Barton










ANNEXURE B3

Ground water monitoring results – organics (December 2014)



P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 1 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL





PROJECT REFERENCE : 16XWATER SAMPLES


:ORDER NUMBER



BDL - Below Detection Limit








P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 2 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04877

ID-2S

H04876


ID-3S


H04875

ID-1S

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl

EPA 8270CMethod SVOC in Water by GC/MS Reference

BDL 50 BDL 5050BDL50Phenol(ug/l)

BDL 55 BDL 5555BDL502-Chlorophenol(ug/l)

BDL 59 BDL 5959BDL50Benzene, 1,3-dichloro-(ug/l)



BDL 51 BDL 5151BDL502-methylphenol(ug/l)

BDL 51 BDL 5151BDL50Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether(ug/l)

BDL 56 BDL 5656BDL504-Methylphenol(ug/l)

BDL 53 BDL 5353BDL50N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine(ug/l)

BDL 55 BDL 5555BDL50Hexachloroethane(ug/l)

BDL 53 BDL 5353BDL50Nitrobenzene(ug/l)

BDL 52 BDL 5252BDL50Isophorone(ug/l)

BDL 60 BDL 6060BDL502-Nitrophenol(ug/l)

BDL 55 BDL 5555BDL502,4-Dimethylphenol(ug/l)

BDL 56 BDL 5656BDL502,4-Dichlorophenol(ug/l)

BDL 53 BDL 5353BDL50Naphthalene(ug/l)

BDL 53 BDL 5353BDL50p-Chloroaniline(ug/l)

BDL 52 BDL 5252BDL50Hexachlorobutadiene(ug/l)

BDL 55 BDL 5555BDL504-chloro-3-methylphenol(ug/l)









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 3 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04877

ID-2S

H04876


ID-3S


H04875

ID-1S

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


BDL 50 BDL 5050BDL502-Methylnaphthalene(ug/l)

BDL 54 BDL 5454BDL50Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(ug/l)

BDL 52 BDL 5252BDL502,4,6-Trichlorophenol(ug/l)


BDL 50 BDL 5050BDL502-Chloronaphthalene(ug/l)

BDL 49 BDL 4949BDL50o-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

BDL 49 BDL 4949BDL50Dimethylphthalate(ug/l)

BDL 49 BDL 4949BDL50Acenaphthylene(ug/l)

BDL 54 BDL 5454BDL50m-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

BDL 49 BDL 4949BDL50Acenaphthene(ug/l)

BDL 48 BDL 4848BDL50Dibenzofuran(ug/l)

BDL 49 BDL 4949BDL502,4-Dinitrotoluene(ug/l)

BDL 52 BDL 5252BDL50Diethyl Phthalate(ug/l)

BDL 51 BDL 5151BDL50Fluorene(ug/l)

BDL 48 BDL 4848BDL504-Chlorophenyl-phenylether(ug/l)

BDL 53 BDL 5353BDL50p-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

BDL 49 BDL 4949BDL50Azobenzene(ug/l)

BDL 51 BDL 5151BDL504-Bromophenyl-phenylether(ug/l)

BDL 47 BDL 4747BDL50Hexachlorobenzene(ug/l)









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 4 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04877

ID-2S

H04876


ID-3S


H04875

ID-1S

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


BDL 49 BDL 4949BDL50Phenathrene(ug/l)

BDL 48 BDL 4848BDL50Anthracene(ug/l)

BDL 49 BDL 4949BDL50Carbazole(ug/l)

BDL 51 BDL 5151BDL50Dibutyl phthalate(ug/l)

BDL 48 BDL 4848BDL50Pyrene(ug/l)

BDL 56 BDL 5656BDL50Benzyl Butyl Phthalate(ug/l)

BDL 53 BDL 5353BDL50Benz[a]anthracene(ug/l)

BDL 51 BDL 5151BDL50Chrysene(ug/l)

BDL 52 BDL 5252BDL50Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate(ug/l)

BDL 61 BDL 6161BDL50Di-n-octylphthalate(ug/l)

BDL 47 BDL 4747BDL50Benzo(b)fluoranthene(ug/l)

BDL 52 BDL 5252BDL50Benzo(k)fluoranthene(ug/l)

BDL 53 BDL 5353BDL50Benzo(a)pyrene(ug/l)



Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 5 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04880

ID-4S

H04879


ID-4D


H04878

ID-3D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 6 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04880

ID-4S

H04879


ID-4D


H04878

ID-3D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 7 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04880

ID-4S

H04879


ID-4D


H04878

ID-3D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl

















Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 8 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04883

KBH-3D

H04882


KBH-4S


H04881

KBH-3S

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 9 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04883

KBH-3D

H04882


KBH-4S


H04881

KBH-3S

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 10 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04883

KBH-3D

H04882


KBH-4S


H04881

KBH-3S

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl










BDL 52 84 5252BDL50Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate(ug/l)







Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 11 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04886

KBH-5

H04885


KBH-6S


H04884

KBH-4D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 12 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04886

KBH-5

H04885


KBH-6S


H04884

KBH-4D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 13 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04886

KBH-5

H04885


KBH-6S


H04884

KBH-4D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl

















Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 14 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04889

KBH7D

H04888


KBH-10D


H04887

KBH-6D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 15 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04889

KBH7D

H04888


KBH-10D


H04887

KBH-6D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 16 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H04889

KBH7D

H04888


KBH-10D


H04887

KBH-6D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl

















Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 17 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL




H04890

KBH-

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


50BDL50Phenol(ug/l)

55BDL502-Chlorophenol(ug/l)

59BDL50Benzene, 1,3-dichloro-(ug/l)



51BDL502-methylphenol(ug/l)

51BDL50Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether(ug/l)

56BDL504-Methylphenol(ug/l)

53BDL50N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine(ug/l)

55BDL50Hexachloroethane(ug/l)

53BDL50Nitrobenzene(ug/l)

52BDL50Isophorone(ug/l)

60BDL502-Nitrophenol(ug/l)

55BDL502,4-Dimethylphenol(ug/l)

56BDL502,4-Dichlorophenol(ug/l)

53BDL50Naphthalene(ug/l)

53BDL50p-Chloroaniline(ug/l)

52BDL50Hexachlorobutadiene(ug/l)

55BDL504-chloro-3-methylphenol(ug/l)









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 18 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL




H04890

KBH-

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


50BDL502-Methylnaphthalene(ug/l)

54BDL50Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(ug/l)

52BDL502,4,6-Trichlorophenol(ug/l)

50BDL502,4,5-Trichlorophenol(ug/l)

50BDL502-Chloronaphthalene(ug/l)

49BDL50o-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

49BDL50Dimethylphthalate(ug/l)

49BDL50Acenaphthylene(ug/l)

54BDL50m-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

49BDL50Acenaphthene(ug/l)

48BDL50Dibenzofuran(ug/l)

49BDL502,4-Dinitrotoluene(ug/l)

52BDL50Diethyl Phthalate(ug/l)

51BDL50Fluorene(ug/l)

48BDL504-Chlorophenyl-phenylether(ug/l)

53BDL50p-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

49BDL50Azobenzene(ug/l)

51BDL504-Bromophenyl-phenylether(ug/l)

47BDL50Hexachlorobenzene(ug/l)









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 19 of 19

:

:

:

ML2014-3556

8621100

2014-12-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL




H04890

KBH-

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


49BDL50Phenathrene(ug/l)

48BDL50Anthracene(ug/l)

49BDL50Carbazole(ug/l)

51BDL50Dibutyl phthalate(ug/l)

48BDL50Pyrene(ug/l)

56BDL50Benzyl Butyl Phthalate(ug/l)

53BDL50Benz[a]anthracene(ug/l)

51BDL50Chrysene(ug/l)

52BDL50Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate(ug/l)

61BDL50Di-n-octylphthalate(ug/l)

47BDL50Benzo(b)fluoranthene(ug/l)

52BDL50Benzo(k)fluoranthene(ug/l)

53BDL50Benzo(a)pyrene(ug/l)



Joanne Barton










ANNEXURE B4

Ground water monitoring results – organics (March 2015)



P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 1 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL





PROJECT REFERENCE : 8 BOREHOLES SAMPLES


:ORDER NUMBER











P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 2 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06094

KBH-3S

H06093


KBH-3D


H06092

KBH-2

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl



























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 3 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06094

KBH-3S

H06093


KBH-3D


H06092

KBH-2

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl



























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 4 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06094

KBH-3S

H06093


KBH-3D


H06092

KBH-2

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl














108 51 110 515111050Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate(ug/l)












P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 5 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06094

KBH-3S

H06093


KBH-3D


H06092

KBH-2

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 6 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06094

KBH-3S

H06093


KBH-3D


H06092

KBH-2

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


73 1932Total Organic Carbon as C(mg/l)


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 7 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06097

KBH-4S

H06096


KBH-6D


H06095

KBH-4D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl



























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 8 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06097

KBH-4S

H06096


KBH-6D


H06095

KBH-4D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl



























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 9 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06097

KBH-4S

H06096


KBH-6D


H06095

KBH-4D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


























P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 10 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06097

KBH-4S

H06096


KBH-6D


H06095

KBH-4D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl





Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 11 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


H06097

KBH-4S

H06096


KBH-6D


H06095

KBH-4D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


22 2416Total Organic Carbon as C(mg/l)


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 12 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


KBH-10

H06099



H06098

KBH-9D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


BDL 5555BDL50Phenol(ug/l)

BDL 4545BDL502-Chlorophenol(ug/l)

BDL 3939BDL50Benzene, 1,3-dichloro-(ug/l)



BDL 4343BDL502-methylphenol(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL50Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether(ug/l)

BDL 4141BDL504-Methylphenol(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL50N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine(ug/l)

BDL 4040BDL50Hexachloroethane(ug/l)

BDL 4141BDL50Nitrobenzene(ug/l)

BDL 4141BDL50Isophorone(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL502-Nitrophenol(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL502,4-Dimethylphenol(ug/l)

BDL 4141BDL502,4-Dichlorophenol(ug/l)

BDL 4141BDL50Naphthalene(ug/l)

BDL 4343BDL50p-Chloroaniline(ug/l)









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 13 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


KBH-10

H06099



H06098

KBH-9D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


BDL 4242BDL50Hexachlorobutadiene(ug/l)

BDL 4343BDL504-chloro-3-methylphenol(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL502-Methylnaphthalene(ug/l)

BDL 3737BDL50Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(ug/l)

BDL 4343BDL502,4,6-Trichlorophenol(ug/l)

BDL 4343BDL502,4,5-Trichlorophenol(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL502-Chloronaphthalene(ug/l)

BDL 4444BDL50o-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL50Dimethylphthalate(ug/l)

BDL 4040BDL50Acenaphthylene(ug/l)

BDL 4343BDL50m-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

BDL 4040BDL50Acenaphthene(ug/l)

BDL 4141BDL50Dibenzofuran(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL502,4-Dinitrotoluene(ug/l)

BDL 4444BDL50Diethyl Phthalate(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL50Fluorene(ug/l)

BDL 4040BDL504-Chlorophenyl-phenylether(ug/l)









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 14 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


KBH-10

H06099



H06098

KBH-9D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


BDL 4646BDL50p-Nitroaniline(ug/l)

BDL 4343BDL50Azobenzene(ug/l)

BDL 4040BDL504-Bromophenyl-phenylether(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL50Hexachlorobenzene(ug/l)

BDL 4242BDL50Phenathrene(ug/l)

BDL 4141BDL50Anthracene(ug/l)

BDL 4343BDL50Carbazole(ug/l)

BDL 4646BDL50Dibutyl phthalate(ug/l)

BDL 4545BDL50Pyrene(ug/l)

BDL 4949BDL50Benzyl Butyl Phthalate(ug/l)

BDL 5555BDL50Benz[a]anthracene(ug/l)

BDL 5252BDL50Chrysene(ug/l)

BDL 5151BDL50Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate(ug/l)

BDL 5656BDL50Di-n-octylphthalate(ug/l)

BDL 3838BDL50Benzo(b)fluoranthene(ug/l)

BDL 3838BDL50Benzo(k)fluoranthene(ug/l)









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 15 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


KBH-10

H06099



H06098

KBH-9D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


BDL 4747BDL50Benzo(a)pyrene(ug/l)



Joanne Barton









P.O. Box 82124

Southdale, 2135

40 Modulus Road

Page 16 of 16

:

:

:

ML2015-0981

8677215

2015-04-08

Ref. No.

Contract No.

Date

Ormonde, 2091

Tel: (011) 661 7900

Fax: (011) 496 2238

0861 467 765


CONFIDENTIAL


KBH-10

H06099



H06098

KBH-9D

Result


Lab Number

Sample Marks

Determinant

DetectionLimit

Quanti-fication

LimitQualityControl


7030Total Organic Carbon as C(mg/l)


Supervisor

Edward Khumalo










ANNEXURE C

Ground water monitoring results – inorganics

ANNEXURE C1

Ground water monitoring results – inorganics (June 2014)

KBH, VBH & SNS June 14-0169- BH results

SAMPLE ID SAMPLE No. LAB No. Ca K Mg Na S-SO4 Si-SiO2 Al As B Ba Be Bi Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Hg Li Mn Mo Ni P-PO4 Pb Sb Se Sn Sr Ti V ZnPAlk

TOTAlk pH Cond F

-Cl

-NH3-N NO3-N NO2-N E Fact % Cation:Anion Difference (%) TDS, (ppm)

KBH-3D(2014.04.04) 438652 14/0169 63 7.6 56 61 308 15 <0.07 <0.02 0.20 0.28 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.83e-1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.79e-1 <0.01 <0.02 0.12 0 283 7.8 1065 <0.03 8.8 17 <0.37 <0.08 1.011 3.102 680

KBH-3S(2014.04.04) 438653 14/0169 3.1 29 8.5 742 869 <1.11 <0.07 <0.02 0.26 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.19 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 0.27 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.04 255 824 9.7 3161 0.29 50 11 1.4 0.48 0.812 2.304 2141

KBH-4D(2014.04.04) 438654 14/0169 147 12 146 273 1451 18 <0.07 <0.02 0.22 0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 0.02 0.18 <0.02 0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.20 <0.01 <0.02 0.14 0 344 7.5 2993 <0.03 15 51 <0.37 0.13 1.041 4.384 2325

KBH-4S(2014.04.04) 438655 14/0169 225 30 439 1332 6122 13 0.09 <0.02 0.95 0.18 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 2.4 <0.02 0.04 0.95 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.41 <0.01 <0.02 0.29 0 464 7.7 11172 <0.03 47 458 157 0.49 0.983 6.357 9026

KBH-5(2014.04.04) 438656 14/0169 62 4.5 174 90 350 5.4 <0.07 <0.02 1.1 0.33 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.88e-1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.16 <0.01 <0.02 0.11 0 662 7.9 1741 <0.03 52 2.1 <0.37 <0.08 1.168 0.865 1192

KBH-6D(2014.04.04) 438657 14/0169 146 3.9 107 53 614 10 <0.07 <0.02 0.31 0.22 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.49 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.15 <0.01 <0.02 0.18 0 294 7.6 1551 <0.03 33 0.24 <0.37 <0.08 1.163 2.771 1261

KBH-7D(2014.04.04) 438658 14/0169 77 5.6 45 32 85 18 <0.07 <0.02 0.54 0.60 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.63e-1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.94e-1 <0.01 <0.02 0.31 0 308 7.5 828 <0.03 43 0.51 3.9 <0.08 1.030 1.712 528

KBH-9D(2014.04.04) 438659 14/0169 424 14 344 245 2616 28 0.16 <0.02 1.5 0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 0.03 0.12 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.68 0.10e-1 <0.02 0.24 0 405 7.1 4690 <0.03 57 36 44 <0.08 1.256 3.706 4611

KBH-10D(2014.04.04) 438660 14/0169 47 39 195 1002 5488 13 <0.07 <0.02 1.4 0.15 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.22 <0.02 0.07 0.62 <0.02 0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.17 <0.01 <0.02 0.14 0 1006 8.1 11807 1.9 71 910 <0.37 <0.08 0.879 9.227 7839

KWG-2D(2014.04.04) 438661 14/0169 61 9.3 25 26 20 19 <0.07 <0.02 0.35 1.2 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.23 <0.02 <0.02 1.9 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.30 <0.01 <0.02 0.19 0 292 7.7 654 0.24 29 5.3 <0.37 <0.08 0.976 2.293 406

KWG-2S(2014.04.04) 438662 14/0169 86 7.8 36 30 5.7 22 <0.07 <0.02 0.22 0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 2.9 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.40 <0.01 <0.02 0.28 0 379 7.5 796 0.14 45 0.35 <0.37 <0.08 1.046 0.809 496

KWG-3(2014.04.04) 438663 14/0169 98 22 85 73 579 12 <0.07 <0.02 0.34 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.28 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.37 <0.01 <0.02 0.19 0 128 8.2 1428 <0.03 52 2.5 9.2 0.82 1.023 2.968 1095

MF-1(2014.04.04) 438664 14/0169 214 5.9 103 49 596 26 0.08 <0.02 6.2 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 0.05 0.64e-1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.21 <0.01 <0.02 0.47 0 366 7.3 1839 <0.03 96 3.3 5.4 <0.08 1.139 3.806 1821

MF-2(2014.04.04) 438665 14/0169 221 7.9 115 30 683 16 0.08 <0.02 0.43 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.27 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.72 <0.01 <0.02 0.24 0 323 7.4 1786 <0.03 53 <0.18 13 <0.08 1.194 2.594 1881

MF-3(2014.04.04) 438666 14/0169 225 9.5 94 56 625 23 0.08 <0.02 7.9 0.27 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.46 <0.02 0.04 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.27 <0.01 <0.02 4.8 0 323 7.3 2007 0.21 140 18 15 <0.08 1.065 3.891 1858

TSG-2(2014.04.04) 438667 14/0169 17 36 8.3 1440 86 5.9 0.19 <0.02 787 0.59 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.40 <0.02 3.2 0.04 3.3 0.47e-1 7.0 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.10 <0.01 <0.02 0.14 962 2950 8.9 4942 0.61 139 5.6 <0.37 <0.08 0.958 0.552 7071

TSG-4(2014.04.04) 438668 14/0169 53 2.7 45 25 36 3.8 <0.07 <0.02 0.37 0.75 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.61e-1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.37 <0.01 <0.02 0.72e-1 2.2 271 8.4 715 <0.03 57 0.40 <0.37 <0.08 0.990 1.848 493

TSG-6D(2014.04.04) 438669 14/0169 234 2.7 146 54 884 20 0.08 <0.02 0.70 0.22 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 0.05 0.09 <0.02 <0.02 0.49 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.22 <0.01 <0.02 0.21 0 409 7.6 2077 <0.03 36 0.26 3.0 <0.08 1.241 3.039 1850

TSG-7D(2014.04.04) 438670 14/0169 164 3.5 23 14 439 19 <0.07 <0.02 0.63 0.32 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.15 <0.02 0.11 2.6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.24 <0.01 <0.02 0.67 0 104 7.0 982 <0.03 15 0.67 <0.37 <0.08 1.102 3.679 817

TSG-7S(2014.04.04) 438671 14/0169 28 2.3 6.4 40 23 7.4 0.23 <0.02 0.36e-1 0.84 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.10 <0.02 <0.02 2.8 0.31e-1 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.12 <0.01 <0.02 0.39 0 152 7.5 349 0.28 22 1.4 <0.37 <0.08 0.967 4.100 260

TSG-8S(2014.04.04) 438672 14/0169 68 1.2 34 36 89 15 <0.07 <0.02 0.43 0.56 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 1.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 0.04 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.18 <0.01 <0.02 1.5 0 290 7.5 748 0.16 29 <0.18 2.7 <0.08 1.014 5.257 462

TSG-9D(2014.04.04) 438673 14/0169 118 0.73 91 69 605 12 <0.07 <0.02 0.27 0.28 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 1.4 <0.02 0.36e-1 0.86 <0.02 0.44e-1 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.23 <0.01 <0.02 0.17 0 131 6.9 1475 0.50 93 0.39 0.49 <0.08 1.064 4.366 1234

VBH-1(2014.04.04) 438674 14/0169 40 15 62 247 323 11 <0.07 <0.02 1.3 0.49 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 0.34e-1 0.75e-1 0.84 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.42 <0.01 <0.02 0.20 4.7 410 8.4 1679 5.3 117 0.34 <0.37 <0.08 0.876 0.842 1219

VBH-2(2014.04.04) 438675 14/0169 6.6 2.3 9.4 61 3.1 3.1 <0.07 <0.02 0.74 0.68 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.19 <0.01 <0.02 0.11 13 112 9.0 392 0.30 55 <0.18 <0.37 <0.08 0.739 0.842 225

VBH-4D(2014.04.04) 438676 14/0169 28 3.1 12 99 19 14 <0.07 <0.02 1.5 0.62 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 0.49e-1 0.59e-1 <0.02 <0.02 0.31 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.41 <0.01 <0.02 0.87e-1 0 249 8.2 681 0.72 59 <0.18 0.76 <0.08 0.812 2.171 421

VBH-4M(2014.04.04) 438677 14/0169 23 1.7 14 62 18 15 <0.07 <0.02 0.29 0.60 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.99 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.16 <0.01 <0.02 0.25 0 166 7.8 517 0.18 55 0.22 <0.37 <0.08 0.809 1.918 308

VBH-5D(2014.04.04) 438678 14/0169 9.4 1.7 5.1 145 19 9.3 <0.07 <0.02 1.9 0.67 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.81e-1 <0.02 0.03 0.18e-1 <0.02 0.38e-1 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.39 <0.01 <0.02 0.12 0 185 7.9 786 1.7 123 0.21 <0.37 <0.08 0.662 2.632 458

VBH-5M(2014.04.04) 438679 14/0169 3.1 3.8 1.6 238 5.4 4.8 <0.07 <0.02 0.39 0.52 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 0.28 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.64e-1 <0.01 <0.02 0.58e-1 42 163 9.5 1285 0.62 289 3.5 <0.37 <0.08 0.558 2.756 673

VWG-1(2014.04.04) 438680 14/0169 23 3.0 14 47 138 3.3 <0.07 <0.02 0.41 0.54e-1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.48e-1 <0.01 <0.02 0.12 0 71 8.2 469 <0.03 14 <0.18 <0.37 <0.08 0.827 3.063 287

VWG-2D(2014.04.04) 438681 14/0169 93 4.1 49 39 204 34 <0.07 <0.02 0.56 0.95e-1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 0.70e-1 2.6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.65 <0.01 <0.02 0.26 0 293 7.7 967 <0.03 35 <0.18 <0.37 <0.08 1.045 2.877 674

VWG-2S(2014.04.04) 438682 14/0169 25 2.5 6.4 11 10 5.9 <0.07 <0.02 0.38 0.56 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.18 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.82e-1 <0.01 <0.02 0.51e-1 0 109 8.4 224 0.39 1.7 0.67 <0.37 <0.08 1.012 1.704 139

VWG-5(2014.04.04) 438683 14/0169 57 14 81 63 9.9 8.0 <0.07 <0.02 0.47 0.63 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 <0.02 1.2 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.30 <0.01 <0.02 0.29 0 674 7.9 1199 0.06 15 14 <0.37 <0.08 1.056 2.431 669

VWG-8D(2014.04.04) 438684 14/0169 23 3.1 11 33 41 5.6 <0.07 <0.02 0.33 0.53 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 0.03 0.19 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 0.12 <0.01 <0.02 0.16 0 125 7.8 361 0.18 11 <0.18 0.78 <0.08 0.874 2.651 215

VWG-10(2014.04.04) 438685 14/0169 350 7.6 179 107 1421 12 0.86e-1 <0.02 4.6 0.26 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 <0.02 1.0 0.40 <0.02 0.20e-1 0.55 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 1.2 <0.01 <0.02 0.24 0 399 7.9 2845 <0.03 119 <0.18 1.8 0.66 1.288 5.076 2610

ICP-OES:

2014.04.07

2014.04.11

All of the results in this report relate only to the item tested.

Expanded Uncertainties: ICP-MS,

Potensiometric Titrator:

Photometric:

Conductivity Meter:

MAIN LABORATORY; SANAS Accredited Testing Laboratory No TO260 : ANALYTICAL REPORT

Environmental Management (P_BAMBO)

Hattingh, J

E - mail

DATE RECEIVED

DATE COMPLETED

COPIES TO

ORIGIN OF SAMPLES

FORM OF TRANSMISSION

Techniques

Expanded Uncertainties: Metrohm Titrators

Expanded Uncertainties: Aquakem NH3-N, NO3-N, NO2-N & Cl: 3.278%

Al, As, Ba, Be, B, Cd, Co, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Sn, Sr, V & Zn: (PPM)

Al, Cr, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S-SO4, Sn, Ti, Zn: 1.31%,

As, Ba, Be, B, Cd, Co, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Sr, V & Zn: 4.954%

pH: 0.414%, Cl: 4.187%, Alk 4.216%

ICP-MS:

The components indicated in red on this report are not included in the SANAS Schedule of Accreditation for this laboratory: COND,P-Alkalinity,Cl,SUSP,F-, NO2-N,Phenol,CN

-,Al,As,B,Be,Bi,Co,Cu,Li,Mo,Ni,Sb,Si-SiO2,Sn,Sr,Ti,Turb,Oil,COD,Sulphite & TDS

Expanded Uncertainties: ICP-OES,

Analytes & UnitsPAlkalinity (CaCO3 PPM),

TotAlkalinity (CaCO3 PPM), pH @ 25

oC, Cl (PPM)

NH3-N, NO3-N, NO2-N, F, CN-, Phenol, Cl, Cr

6+ (PPM)

Methods

QMMAIN0008, MCSMLQAWP0029,31

MCSMLQAWP0019 & 0020

Conductivity @ 25oC(µS/cm)

Al, Cr, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S-SO4, Sn, Ti, Zn: (PPM)


QMMAIN0008, MCSMLQAWP0022

MCSMLQAWP0016

Technical Manager Tel 016 889 3304

Page 1 of 1




ANNEXURE C2

Ground water monitoring results – inorganics (September 2014)

September 14-0347- BH results Klip dump

Order No Request


TOTAlk pH Cond F

-Cl

-NH3-N NO3-N NO2-N COD TDS, (ppm) E Fact % Cation:Anion Difference (%)

KBH-3D(2014.08.08) 456839 14/0347 59 8.5 54 76 369 12 <0.09 <0.02 0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.08 <0.02 <0.02 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.07 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 256 7.7 1093 <0.07 10 19 <0.74 <0.16 25 740 1.012 4.779

KBH-3S(2014.08.08) 456840 14/0347 4.8 28 6.1 889 926 5.5 0.09 <0.02 0.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 0.58 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.02 0.28 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 <0.02 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 276 915 9.7 3294 <0.07 62 9.8 <0.74 <0.16 66 2353 0.871 1.658

KBH-4D(2014.08.08) 456841 14/0347 176 14 172 395 1845 20 <0.09 <0.02 0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.02 0.16 <0.02 0.04 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.23 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 335 7.1 3431 <0.07 18 59 1.8 4.4 38 2851 1.112 2.161

KBH-4S(2014.08.08) 456842 14/0347 242 30 473 1666 6855 16 <0.09 <0.02 0.72 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 0.04 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 1.8 <0.02 0.03 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.40 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 477 7.4 11286 <0.07 57 467 138 7.2 97 9589 1.085 4.334

KBH-5(2014.08.08) 456843 14/0347 41 3.5 136 74 255 4.7 <0.09 <0.02 0.74 0.07 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.02 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.08 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 563 8.0 1443 0.53 42 0.41 <0.74 <0.16 <7.72 1015 1.109 3.657

KBH-6D(2014.08.08) 456844 14/0347 168 4.0 101 53 618 12 <0.09 <0.02 0.06 0.10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.47 <0.02 <0.02 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.16 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 334 7.7 1649 0.27 35 <0.37 <0.74 <0.16 <7.72 1372 1.139 3.736

KBH-8D(2014.08.08) 456845 14/0347 100 3.8 69 39 173 22 <0.09 <0.02 0.18 0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.23 <0.02 <0.02 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.10 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 416 7.5 1158 0.70 49 6.1 0.77 <0.16 <7.72 754 1.056 2.235

KBH-9D(2014.08.08) 456846 14/0347 455 13 321 231 2568 25 0.18 <0.02 0.94 0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 0.62 <0.02 <0.02 0.35 <0.02 <0.02 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.58 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 376 7.1 4251 <0.07 54 27 13 <0.16 9.0 4329 1.351 1.935

KBH-10D(2014.08.08) 456847 14/0347 49 40 195 1042 5543 9.5 0.58 <0.02 1.1 0.07 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 0.04 2.6 <0.02 0.06 0.65 <0.02 <0.02 0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.18 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 1011 8.2 11673 0.92 77 934 <0.74 <0.16 66 7791 0.820 8.356

KBH-7D(2014.08.08)-Received late 461171 14/0347 74 5.5 43 30 88 20 <0.09 <0.02 0.23 0.06 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.07 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 307 8.1 838 0.38 45 <0.37 4.0 <0.16 <7.72 515 1.006 4.323


QMMAIN0008, MCSMLQAWP0022

MCSMLQAWP0016

Methods



MCSMLQAWP0026COD, O2 (PPM)




pH: 0.414%, Cl: 4.187%, Alk 4.216%

Analytes & UnitsPAlkalinity (CaCO3 PPM), TotAlkalinity (CaCO3 PPM), pH @ 25oC, Cl (PPM)

NH3-N, NO3-N, NO2-N, F, CN-, Phenol, Cl, Cr6+ (PPM)




Techniques


Photometric:

Conductivity Meter:


NH3-N, NO3-N, NO2-N & Cl: 3.278%


2014.08.12

2014.09.11




Expanded Uncertainties: Aquakem

ICP-OES:

ICP-MS:

DATE RECEIVED

DATE COMPLETED

COPIES TO

ORIGIN OF SAMPLES




Hattingh, J

E - mail


Technical Signatory S Nomntu

Tel 016 889 3304

Page 1 of 1




ANNEXURE C3

Ground water monitoring results – inorganics (November 2014)

November 14-0510- Klip Dump

Order No Request


TOTAlk pH Cond F

-Cl

-NH3-N NO3-N NO2-N COD % Cation:Anion Difference (%) E Fact TDS, (ppm)

KBH-3D(2014.11.13) 471244 14/0510 58 9.9 59 93 420 9.7 <0.09 <0.02 0.05 0.11 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.07 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.06 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 238 7.8 1211 <0.24 11 22 <0.92 <0.16 <7.72 2.079 0.976 806

KBH-3S(2014.11.13) 471245 14/0510 1.8 30 4.9 911 922 <1.84 <0.09 <0.02 0.05 0.10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 0.40 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 <0.02 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 271 940 9.6 3453 <0.24 63 9.1 <0.92 <0.16 71 2.004 0.840 2408

KBH-4D(2014.11.13) 471246 14/0510 201 16 204 429 2096 20 <0.09 <0.02 0.07 0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.20 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.17 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 361 7.1 3761 <0.24 20 67 6.5 <0.16 <7.72 2.239 1.153 3098

KBH-4S(2014.11.13) 471247 14/0510 278 30 567 1765 6862 14 <0.09 <0.02 0.54 0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 2.8 <0.02 <0.03 0.55 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.33 <0.04 <0.02 0.21 0 474 7.4 12567 <0.24 53 498 323 5.4 31 3.249 1.037 10916

KBH-5(2014.11.13) 471248 14/0510 35 3.5 150 78 204 4.3 <0.09 <0.02 0.59 0.11 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.06 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 598 7.8 1424 0.56 40 2.0 <0.92 <0.16 <7.72 1.018 1.146 928

KBH-6S(2014.11.13) 471249 14/0510 240 27 154 49 1234 11 <0.09 <0.02 0.03 0.08 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.04 0.22 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.43 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 33 7.8 2043 0.34 18 1.2 16 0.22 18 0.720 1.279 1864

KBH-6D(2014.11.13) 471250 14/0510 200 4.5 122 57 730 13 <0.09 <0.02 0.04 0.11 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.31 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.14 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 325 7.6 1708 0.37 33 0.93 1.3 0.88 <7.72 0.022 1.262 1399

KBH-7D(2014.11.13) 471251 14/0510 77 5.6 46 32 74 18 <0.09 <0.02 0.22 0.14 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.14 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.06 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 303 7.3 829 0.32 46 0.48 3.6 <0.16 <7.72 0.207 1.023 489

KBH-9D(2014.11.13) 471252 14/0510 474 16 390 292 3013 23 <0.09 <0.02 0.86 0.09 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.24 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.51 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 400 6.9 4675 0.30 56 40 9.9 <0.16 <7.72 1.330 1.416 4677

KBH-10D(2014.11.13) 471253 14/0510 53 41 201 1087 5770 11 <0.09 <0.02 0.96 0.07 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.05 0.31 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.13 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 1019 8.1 11361 1.1 72 902 <0.92 <0.16 95 9.611 0.867 7745

ICP-OES:

Gravimetric:

2014.11.17

2015.01.15



Photometric:

Conductivity Meter:



Hattingh, J

E - mail

DATE RECEIVED

DATE COMPLETED

COPIES TO

ORIGIN OF SAMPLES


Techniques



NH3-N, NO3-N, NO2-N & Cl: 3.278%




pH: 0.414%, Cl: 4.187%, Alk 4.216%

ICP-MS:







oC, Cl (PPM)


6+ (PPM)

Methods

MCSMLQAWP0029,31



Suspension @ 105oC,(PPM), TDS @ 180

oC,(PPM)


MCSMLQAWP0029,31

MCSMLQAWP0028, 24

MCSMLQAWP0022

MCSMLQAWP0016


Page 1 of 1




ANNEXURE C4

Ground water monitoring results – inorganics (March 2015)

KBH, VBD & SNS - March 2015 Results

Order No Request


TOTAlk pH Cond F

-Cl

-NH3-N NO3-N NO2-N COD E Fact % Cation:Anion Difference (%) TDS, (ppm)

KBH 2(2015-03-10) 488252 15/0110 6.4 3.4 144 71 38 3.9 <0.09 <0.02 0.67 0.15 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 <0.02 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 672 8.3 1242 0.27 40 0.94 <0.92 <0.16 <7.72 1.156 0.273 713

KBH 3D(2015-03-10) 488253 15/0110 20 9.5 35 76 230 4.7 <0.09 <0.02 0.36e-1 0.13 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 <0.02 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 10 216 8.5 869 <0.22 14 19 <0.92 <0.16 <7.72 0.873 5.644 474

KBH 3S(2015-03-10) 488254 15/0110 1.9 30 15 884 1206 <1.84 <0.09 <0.02 0.70e-1 0.14 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 0.27 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 <0.02 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 342 1029 9.7 3999 <0.22 72 45 <0.92 <0.16 81 0.833 5.203 2687

KBH 4D(2015-03-10) 488255 15/0110 160 13 171 316 1698 21 <0.09 <0.02 0.78e-1 0.11 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.26e-1 0.16 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.19 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 373 7.2 3395 <0.22 19 60 <0.92 <0.16 <7.72 1.055 4.706 2681

KBH 4S(2015-03-10) 488256 15/0110 207 26 458 1384 5917 16 0.11 <0.02 0.73 0.21 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 0.25e-1 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 1.9 <0.02 <0.03 1.6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.37 <0.04 <0.02 0.15 0 570 7.7 11478 <0.22 54 458 209 1.2 45 0.960 5.856 9332

KBH 6D(2015-03-10) 488257 15/0110 145 4.2 111 55 620 12 <0.09 <0.02 0.65e-1 0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 0.47 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.14 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 292 7.4 1566 <0.22 36 0.77 <0.92 <0.16 <7.72 1.167 2.271 1212

KBH 9D(2015-03-10) 488258 15/0110 440 16 384 285 2959 29 <0.09 <0.02 1.2 0.15 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 1.3 <0.02 0.22e-1 0.14 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.72 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 469 6.9 4655 <0.22 53 42 9.7 <0.16 <7.72 1.400 3.146 4404

KBH 10(2015-03-10) 488259 15/0110 38 38 201 979 5337 12 <0.09 <0.02 1.2 0.11 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 0.25 <0.02 0.69e-1 0.51 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.13 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 1074 8.2 11102 1.3 74 857 <0.92 <0.16 86 0.836 10.325 7201

VBH 1(2015-03-10) 488260 15/0110 44 22 71 338 363 19 <0.09 <0.02 1.2 0.23 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.40e-1 <0.06 1.1 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.57 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 4.8 643 8.4 2149 9.3 142 1.8 <0.92 <0.16 0.895 3.038 1462

VBH 2(2015-03-10) 488261 15/0110 5.9 2.6 9.0 63 2.3 3.6 <0.09 <0.02 0.53 0.21 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.20 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 14 121 9.0 417 0.40 60 0.82 <0.92 <0.16 0.724 3.808 218

VBH 4D(2015-03-10) 488262 15/0110 46 2.3 24 88 79 21 <0.09 <0.02 0.79 0.41 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.05 0.15 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.66 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 265 8.0 801 0.81 60 <0.43 <0.92 <0.16 0.886 2.751 474

VBH 4M(2015-03-10) 488263 15/0110 20 1.8 13 62 4.6 16 <0.09 <0.02 0.19 0.21 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 0.71 <0.02 <0.02 0.88 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.16 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 160 7.4 513 0.37 74 <0.43 <0.92 <0.16 0.798 5.110 268

VBH 5D(2015-03-10) 488264 15/0110 9.7 1.8 5.8 143 21 11 <0.09 <0.02 1.7 0.32 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.21e-1 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.41 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 199 7.8 790 2.0 125 <0.43 <0.92 <0.16 0.684 5.320 440

VBH 5M(2015-03-10) 488265 15/0110 3.4 4.5 2.1 241 2.3 5.2 <0.09 <0.02 0.18 0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 0.55 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.78e-1 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 48 206 9.3 1319 0.66 295 6.3 <0.92 <0.16 0.587 5.110 684

VWG 10(2015-03-10) 488266 15/0110 361 7.4 186 101 1312 15 <0.09 <0.02 3.6 0.14 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.81 0.14 <0.02 <0.03 0.40 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 1.1 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 359 7.7 2778 <0.22 117 <0.43 17 0.55 1.288 1.523 2424

SNS BRICS(2015-03-10) 488267 15/0110 144 8.7 84 53 388 22 <0.09 <0.02 1.1 0.14 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.02 <0.16 <0.02 0.88e-1 <0.06 <0.02 <0.03 <0.25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.12 0.38 <0.04 <0.02 <0.14 0 346 7.4 1373 0.25 60 <0.43 1.5 <0.16 <7.72 1.138 0.485 996

MCSMLQAWP0029,31

MCSMLQAWP0022

MCSMLQAWP0016

Methods

MCSMLQAWP0029,31


MCSMLQAWP0026COD, O2 (PPM)




pH: 0.414%, Cl: 4.187%, Alk 4.216%



oC, Cl (PPM)


6+ (PPM)




Techniques


Photometric:

Conductivity Meter:


NH3-N, NO3-N, NO2-N & Cl: 3.278%


2015.03.10

2015.03.27





ICP-OES:

ICP-MS:

DATE RECEIVED

DATE COMPLETED

COPIES TO

ORIGIN OF SAMPLES




Hattingh, J

E - mail

Technical Signatory S Nomntu

Tel 016 889 3304

Page 1 of 1

external audit report in fulfilment of the … waste site_external... · introduction ... a wml was...

Documents