fair value accounting and the minimum capital test september 21, 2006 toronto jane voll,...
TRANSCRIPT
Fair Value Accounting and the Minimum Capital Test
September 21, 2006
Toronto
Jane Voll, Vice-President and Chief Economist&
Grant Kelly, Director, Policy Development and Assistant Chief Economist
Fair Value Accounting
OSFI guidelines:
Regulatory capital treatment of certain items
under the new financial instruments standards
Guideline D-10: Accounting for financial
instruments designated as “Held for Trading”
(Fair Value Option)
Fair Value Accounting
Industry position on OSFI’s guidelines:
Insurance risk should not be classified as “financial” risk.
Concern over the timeline
Permanence of assets
Tax impacts
Impact on hedging own credit risk, loans and receivables
P&C insurance cycle is volatile
OSFI guideline D-10 should be open to P&C insurance
Fair Value Accounting
Aggregate industry statistics (2005):
BV bonds $51.1 billion (MV $51.8 billion)
BV portfolio excl real estate $60.9 billion (MV $63.4 billion)
Bonds BV yield 4.83% (MV yield 4.76%)
Bond investment income $2.5 billion
Liabilities net of reinsurance $35.5 billion* Source: IBC with data from MSA.
Fair Value Accounting
IBC member survey:
Average duration of bonds: 4.05 years
(Max 11.1 years; Min 0.3 years)
Average duration of claims liabilities: 2.81 years
(Max 5.0 years; Min 0.25 years)
MV/BV Bonds: 100.8%
(Max 103.6%; Min 98.0%)
* Sample of 21 companies/groups (51% of aggregate industry bonds; 57.5% of liabilities). Results are
weighted based on portfolio.
Fair Value Accounting
IBC member survey:
Investment split for co’s that selected an investment option*:
24.4% HFT; 75.3% AFS; 0.3% HTM
% of surveyed co’s that selected 100% HFT: 9.5%
% of surveyed co’s that selected 100% AFS: 42.9%
% of surveyed co’s choosing a mixed of investment categories: 23.8%
* 16 out of 21 companies/groups sampled.
Fair Value Accounting
IBC recommendations/comments to Dept of Finance Canada:
No amendment to the definition of specified debt obligations “SDO’s” as
market to market properties (142.2(1) (b) of the Income Tax Act “ITA”)
If Finance considers a transition period for the expected income tax
reserve change, a 3-4 year period would be appropriate and reasonable.
Maintain the current methodology for calculating balances of the
Canadian Investment Fund and related values for investment property in
Part XXIV of the ITA regulations.
Matching (P&C vs life)???
Status update on the MCT
IBC recommendations to CCIR on the MCT Review:
Canadian P&C regulatory capital requirements remain
significantly higher than other nations with similar or higher
risk profiles
Capital factors for P&C insurers are higher than other FI’s.
Margins on margins
Status update on the MCT
IBC recommendations to CCIR on the MCT Review (con’t):
Penalty (margin) on cessions to sister companies should be
eliminated, since these companies are already regulated under OSFI
Regarding group vs legal entity supervision, the MCT should recognize
group level transferability of capital within a group
Canadian standards will need to evolve to incorporate both standard
tests and internal modeling for risk and solvency assessment
Status update on the MCT
3 stages to MCT review:
1) Immediate: Changes to the test for 2007
2) Medium term: Asset factor review (IBC survey)
3) Long Term: Internal modeling for capital/risk
management
Outstanding concerns with the MCT
Margins on Margins
Asset factors (risk sensitivity)
Solvency requirements vs international