fearful symmetry nov 2011

5
1 Bank is a division of Westpac Banking Corporation ABN 33 007 457 141. Information current as at date above. This information has been prepared without taking account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this you should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Westpac’s financial services guide can be obtained by calling 132 032, visiting www. westpac.c om.au or visiting any Westpac Branch. The information may contain material provided directly by third parties, and while such material is published with permission, Westpac accep ts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any such material. Except where contrary to law, Westpac intends by this notice to exclude liability for the information. The information is subject to change without notice and Westpac is under no obligation to update the information or correct any inaccuracy which may become apparent at a later date. Westpac Banking Corporation is registered in England as a branch (branch number BR000106) and is authorised and regulated by The Financial Services Authority. Westpac Europe Limited is a company registered in England (number 05660023) and is authorised and regulated by The Financial Services Authority. If you wish to be removed from our e-mail, fax or mailing list please send an e-mail to economics@westpac. com.au or fax us on +61 2 8254 6934 or write to Westpac Economics at Level 2, 275 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000. Please state your full name, telephone/fax number and company details on all correspondence. © 2011 Westpac Banking Corporation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The forecasts given in this document are predictive in character. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the assumptions on which the forecasts are based are reasonable, the forecasts may be affected by incorrect assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The ultimate outcomes may differ substantially from these forecasts. a monthly chronicle of the Indian economy  f ear  f ul s  y mmetr  y  Welcome to Westpac’s monthly chronicle of the Indian economy, as seen through the penetrating gaze of  f ear  f ul s  y mmetr  y . A month ago  f ear  f ul s  y mmetr  y spent the bulk of this chronicle bemoaning the RBI’s late cycle tightening zeal. At the heart of  f ear  f ul s  y mmetr  y’s  critique is the lack of respect being shown to the looming transmission of a substantial negative financial shock, which in tandem with the clearly observable slowdown in domestic activity should be trusted bring inflationary pressure to heel in 2012 (and also 2013) without the tightening action seen in the second half of this year. (As an aside, the release of the minutes to the meeting of the RBI’s Technical Advisory Committee, a panel of external experts, conducted in preparation for the latest policy review, recommended no change in rates). Looking further out, policy will be leaning against activity at a time when it would be more appropriate for it to be providing support for growth. That raises the likelihood of a need to ease policy not long after the last hike. In turn that would imply a substantive failure on one of the basic criteria for assessing the quality of policy decision making: that policy did not create undue volatility in the real economy. The RBI’s policy committee has not met since late October, so there is no specific policy decision to decry or applaud, but the steady drumbeat of decelerating global growth continued unabated. The European climate worsened in both the real economy and financial arenas. Business surveys continue to reflect corporate anxiety. The open economies of East Asia showed further signs of a weakening in trade activity. A number of central banks, representing a broad variety of development levels/national and sectoral balance sheets/ industrial structures/degrees of outward orientation/resource endowments, moved to ease monetary policy. Global inflation was on the wane in both developed and emerging markets. Exchange traded metals prices, a bellwether for the heavy industrial cycle, are significantly lower than at mid year. Steel output has slowed considerably. Indicators of the state of the tech sector are very weak. Banks on both sides of the Atlantic reported weak earnings - or losses - in the September quarter. The only real exceptions to the negative trend have been a firmer tone to the US activity data and the resilience of the oil price. Such is the state of the world. The view that the first half of 2012 and the latter moments of the current year will be a very difficult time for global growth - and for the global financial system - underpins  f ear  f ul s  y mmetr  y’s  perspective on India. The reality is that while India is an internally focussed and investment-led economy - thus producing a low-beta response to swings in global growth - the financing of investment, at the margin, must come from abroad, so it is highly vulnerable to downswings that incorporate or are driven by negative financial shocks. Put simply, in India a slowdown in the global economy is felt principally through the hardening of its external financing constraint. That is in contrast to the majority of its East Asian (surplus) neighbours, where global shocks are primarily transmitted via an export-led deceleration in aggregate demand, or its non-China BRIC peers, where swings in commodity prices are the key variable. Simply put, Indian growth cannot register at or above ‘potential’ at a time of November 2011 Westpac Institutional Banking Group Economic Research [email protected] www.westpac.com.au -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 44 48 52 56 60 64 Mar-04 Mar-06 Mar-08 Mar-10 %pa/yr index Rate corridor (rhs) Manufacturi ng PMI (lhs) WPI (rhs) Sources: CEIC, Westpac Economics. Indian monetary policy, activity and inflation pronounced home bias among global investors and therefore the only plausible activity backdrop for one’s present inflation forecast is a disinflationary one. India’s basic balance - the degree to which it is able to over- fund its current account deficit is highly correlated with two Foreign capital inflow & domestic investment -3 0 3 6 9 -20 0 20 40 60 Jun-98 Jun-00 Jun-02 Jun-04 Jun-06 Jun-08 Jun-10 %GDP %yr Other (mainly loans) Portfolio investment Direct investment Capital goods output (lhs) Basic balance Sources: CEIC, Westpac Economics. Foreign bank claims on India 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Mar-00 Mar-02 Mar-04 Mar-06 Mar-08 Mar-10 $USbn US (22%) UK (25%) Japan (6%) Europe (47%) Total outstanding (lhs) Sources: BIS, Westpac. Shares of total outstanding as of Dec-2010 in parentheses. $USbn Change over the year (rhs)

Upload: chrisbecker

Post on 06-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fearful Symmetry Nov 2011

8/3/2019 Fearful Symmetry Nov 2011

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fearful-symmetry-nov-2011 1/4

Page 2: Fearful Symmetry Nov 2011

8/3/2019 Fearful Symmetry Nov 2011

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fearful-symmetry-nov-2011 2/4

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The forecasts given above are predictive in character. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the assumptions on which the forecasts are based arereasonable, the forecasts may be affected by incorrect assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The results ultimately achieved may differ substantially from these forecasts.

2

a monthly chronicle of the Indian economy

f ear f ul s y mmetr y

vital indicators: domestic capital goods output and changes in theinvestment share of GDP. Prospects for the basic balance comedown to India’s ability to attract both portfolio and banking inflows.That is a vulnerable position to inhabit when European banks are in adire situation and the global fund management community’s appetitefor emerging market risk is in serious question. f ear f ul s y mmetr y feels safe assuming that his assertion on European banking will notspark any informed controversy. The fact that European lenderscontribute almost one half of India’s foreign lending flows, and UKbanks contribute another quarter, is clearly cause for concern. Inthe portfolio space, while October was a decent month under thecircumstances, with foreign institutional investors (FIIs) acquiring anet O17bn of Indian equity and O14bn of Indian debt, it would beunwise to expect on-going reliability on this front. Looking at theyear to date performance of Indian equities (–29%) against MSCI

BRIC (–16% local currency terms), Eurostoxx (–19%), US S&P 500(–3%) and the Nikkei (–18%), and the beleaguered rupee (7% weakeragainst the US dollar since the beginning of August) highlightsthe potential problem. f ear f ul s y mmetr y has heard the dreaded‘stagflation’ moniker attached to India by more than one EM fundmanager. That is not a designation that encourages foreign investorsto form an orderly queue for the entry: more likely a disorderlyscramble for the exit. It has not yet come to that, and nor shouldit given the inflation story will correct soon enough, but for themoment India does not resemble a compelling ‘buy’.

• Turning specifically on the activity picture, industrial productioncontinues to underwhelm, even alarm, with its sluggish performance.Industrial production rose just 1.8%yr in September, down from 3.6%

in August. It recorded a 3.1% pace in Q3 down from 7.0% in the Junequarter. The deceleration has been concentrated in the capital goodsand infrastructure space, consistent with the above thesis of weakcapital inflows damaging the investment cycle. Consumer durableshave maintained an average pace in the high single digits, but withthe bellwether automobile sector seeing weak sales turnover, thisis unlikely to persist. The infrastructure subset slowed to 2.3%in September, after averaging 5%yr in the June quarter. f ear f ul

s y mmetr y argues that the official data is now validating the signalcoming from the manufacturing PMI since June.

• Away from manufacturing, the services PMI has slumped by 9 indexpoints in three readings. The pair of observations in contractionaryterritory seen in September and October is the first since the early2009. Over the history of the series, the headline measure hassunk below 50 in only two cycle phases: the GFC period and today.Historically, ‘mid-cycle’ lows have been in the region of 53. Theemployment sub-index of the services PMI has been below 50 forfour straight months, indicating that the labour market has beenloosening consistently since mid year. f ear f ul s y mmetr y’s perusal ofthe other key surveys (by the RBI and D&B) on business confidence,order books, capacity utilisation, price expectations, employmentplans, profitability, corporate margins and the availability of financeall point to an aggregate softening in conditions. Consumer spendingis also decelerating, with sales of passenger cars, two wheelers andmobile phone subscriptions all well down on the rates seen in thefirst half of the year.

• And finally to inflation, which true to both market expectations andthe RBI’s own thinking, remained elevated in headline terms in theOctober release(s). Headline WPI came in at 9.7%yr which is closeenough to the year to date trend, while non-food manufacturingprices rose 7.5%yr, 0.44%mth, 3.0% 3mth annualised and 2.6%

6mth annualised. The pulse of inflation was mixed across thevarious subsets, with the protein basket continuing to alarm thosewho insist on defining it as a predominantly demand driven series( f ear f ul s y mmetr y argues that the long run structural argument forthis position is clear but that supply is a more powerful influenceon the year to year inflation trend) and elaborately transformedmanufactures prices maintaining their subdued recent performance.At present, primary articles and fuel are contributing about 60% ofmonthly inflation, with neither category sensitive to interest rates.

• Obligatory Chinese comparison stat: Based on the most recentinternational survey data, you are 20 times more likely to run into anIndian resident at the cinema than you are their Chinese counterpart.

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Jan-01 Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan-11

%yr%yrTotal (lhs)Infrastructure industries (lhs)Consumer durables (lhs)Capital goods (rhs)

Sources: CEIC, Westpac Economics. 3mma.

Indian industrial output

40

45

50

55

60

65

40

45

50

55

60

65

Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11

indexindex

ServicesCompositeManuf

Sources: CEIC, Markit.

India: business surveys show softer demand

Contributions to monthly WPI inflation

-2

-1

0

1

2

-2

-1

0

1

2

Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan-11

ppt

OtherEnergyFood- primaryFood - manuf

Non-food manufTotal

Sources: CEIC, Westpac.3 month averages.

ppt

Page 3: Fearful Symmetry Nov 2011

8/3/2019 Fearful Symmetry Nov 2011

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fearful-symmetry-nov-2011 3/4

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The forecasts given above are predictive in character. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the assumptions on which the forecasts are based arereasonable, the forecasts may be affected by incorrect assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The results ultimately achieved may differ substantially from these forecasts.

3

Summary data

f ear f ul s y mmetr y

2011

Monthly Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

Industrial production, of which 8.1 7.5 6.7 9.4 5.3 6.2 9.5 3.8 3.6 1.8 –Manufacturing 8.7 8.1 7.5 11.0 5.7 6.3 11.2 3.1 4.1 2.1 –

Electricity 5.9 10.5 6.8 7.2 6.5 10.3 7.9 13.1 9.5 9.0 –

Basic goods 7.8 7.7 5.6 6.5 7.2 7.5 7.8 9.5 5.2 4.5 –

Capital goods 20.2 5.4 –5.7 14.5 6.6 6.2 38.7 –13.8 4.1 –6.8 –

Intermediate goods 8.1 7.4 6.3 3.1 3.9 0.1 1.6 –0.5 1.9 1.5 –

Consumer durables 7.8 12.5 18.2 14.9 1.6 5.1 1.6 9.0 5.5 8.7 –

Manufacturing PMI (index) 56.7 56.8 57.9 57.9 58.0 57.5 55.3 53.6 52.6 50.4 52.0

New orders to inventories (ratio) 1.18 1.22 1.26 1.27 1.23 1.22 1.19 1.06 1.08 1.02 1.08

Services PMI (index) 54.5 54.8 55.9 55.8 55.1 53.0 54.0 55.3 52.9 50.5 49.9

Composite PMI employment (index) 51.2 51.2 51.2 52.3 51.8 51.6 51.5 50.2 49.3 48.9 18.9

Motor vehicle sales – total %yr 27.7 19.8 22.1 19.4 23.9 15.6 14.6 12.4 15.0 21.9 0.8

Two wheelers 28.7 20.3 22.9 18.7 27.3 16.5 15.5 14.7 18.3 26.5 3.5

Passenger cars 21.4 17.8 22.0 25.0 13.0 6.2 5.5 –5.7 –1.7 0.8 –19.0

New cellular phone subscription mn units 17.1 na 14.7 14.5 11.1 9.5 8.6 7.6 5.3 6.5 –

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep OctDomestic credit %yr 18.3 16.8 17.7 17.5 17.5 17.7 19.0 18.0 18.3 18.4 –

Commercial 22.7 21.4 21.7 21.0 21.4 21.1 21.2 18.9 19.5 19.5 –

Commercial non–food 27.6 23.0 23.0 21.3 22.4 22.1 20.3 18.2 20.1 19.3 –

Resident deposits %yr 19.1 16.1 16.6 16.0 18.0 17.5 18.3 17.4 18.0 17.4 –

Wholesale bank financing (% res. deposits) 2.38 2.52 2.46 2.56 2.51 2.60 2.71 2.82 2.99 – –

External commercial finance* USDbn 3.4 2.7 1.4 5.6 2.1 2.7 3.3 4.2 3.7 2.4 –

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

Exports %yr 60.0 57.6 75.7 51.9 34.7 67.8 46.4 81.8 44.3 36.4 –Imports %yr 2.6 23.8 24.7 19.1 20.5 69.9 42.5 51.5 41.8 17.2 –

Non–oil imports %yr 2.7 28.8 30.1 3.5 12.7 77.7 47.8 58.1 39.5 18.2 –

Trade balance USDbn –2.6 –6.7 –4.9 –4.5 –12.3 –17.3 –7.7 –11.1 –14.0 –9.8 –

Foreign direct investment USDbn 2.0 1.0 1.3 1.1 3.1 4.7 5.7 1.1 2.8 1.8 –

Foreign portfolio investment USDbn –1.5 1.7 –1.6 0.1 3.5 –1.6 0.8 1.6 –1.8 –1.1 –

Net foreign official assets USDbn 289 294 294 296 303 301 304 310 316 317 –

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep OctWholesale price index %yr 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.4 9.8 9.7 9.7

Primary articles – food %yr 15.1 16.7 11.0 9.4 10.7 8.3 7.6 8.2 9.6 9.2 11.1

Primary articles – non–food incl. energy %yr 25.4 26.6 34.4 27.3 26.9 21.4 18.4 15.8 18.2 14.8 7.7

Manufactured products excl. food %yr 6.2 6.5 7.7 8.5 7.0 7.2 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.5

%3th annualised 6.0 10.5 14.9 17.8 14.8 10.4 5.9 2.3 1.8 0.7 3.0

%6th annualised 3.9 6.9 9.3 11.8 12.6 12.6 11.7 8.3 6.0 3.3 2.6

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep OctPolicy repo rate %pa 6.25 6.50 6.50 6.75 6.75 7.25 7.50 8.00 8.00 8.25 8.50

Policy reverse repo rate %pa 5.25 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 6.25 6.50 7.00 7.00 7.25 7.50

Call money (weighted avg) %pa 6.66 6.92 6.94 8.99 6.33 7.33 7.33 7.50 7.84 7.90 8.16

Cash reserve ratio % 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00

3mth Treasury bill %pa 7.19 7.23 7.14 7.31 7.52 8.14 8.19 8.39 8.39 8.44 8.65

12mth Treasury bill %pa 7.49 7.59 7.68 7.64 7.76 8.29 8.29 8.49 8.31 8.46 8.68

INR per USD 45.1 45.4 45.4 44.9 44.3 44.9 44.8 44.4 45.3 47.6 49.2

Nominal effective exchange rate index^ 89.8 88.4 87.6 87.6 87.5 86.3 86.3 87.0 85.0 82.8 80.8

Real effective exchange rate index^ 108.5 108.4 106.7 107.0 108.3 106.5 107.2 108.7 106.3 103.7 101.6

Bombay Sensex 30 20,509 18,328 17,823 19,445 19,136 18,503 18,846 18,197 16,677 16,454 17,705

NIFTY 50 6,135 5,506 5,333 5,834 5,750 5,560 5,647 5,482 5,001 4,943 5,327Foreign instit. investment net debt INRbn 12 102 13 –0.1 –0.2 23 3 26 29 –17 14

Foreign instit. investment net equity INRbn 20 –48 –46 69 72 –66 46 80 –108 –2 17

Sources: CEIC, Westpac Economics, government agencies. *Sum of foreign currency convertible bonds and external commercial borrowings. ̂ Broad BIS measures.

Page 4: Fearful Symmetry Nov 2011

8/3/2019 Fearful Symmetry Nov 2011

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fearful-symmetry-nov-2011 4/4

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The forecasts given above are predictive in character. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the assumptions on which the forecasts are based arereasonable, the forecasts may be affected by incorrect assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The results ultimately achieved may differ substantially from these forecasts.

4

Summary data

f ear f ul s y mmetr y

2009 2010 2011

Quarterly Dec–08 Mar–09 Jun–09 Sep–09 Dec–09 Mar–10 Jun–10 Sep–10 Dec–10 Mar–11 Jun–11

Agriculture etc %yr –3.3 1.2 1.8 1.2 –1.6 1.1 2.4 5.4 9.9 7.5 3.9

Non–agriculture %yr 5.8 5.9 6.3 8.6 7.3 9.4 8.8 8.9 8.3 7.8 7.7

Manufacturing %yr 2.6 1.3 4.3 6.1 11.4 15.2 10.6 10.0 6.0 5.5 7.2

Utilities %yr 5.0 5.1 6.3 7.5 4.5 7.3 5.5 2.8 6.4 7.8 7.9

Construction %yr 0.7 5.3 5.4 5.1 8.3 9.2 7.7 6.7 9.7 8.2 1.2

Commerce & logistics %yr 5.4 5.8 3.7 8.2 10.8 13.7 12.1 10.9 8.6 9.3 12.8

Finance & commercial services %yr 12.3 14.3 11.5 10.9 8.5 6.3 9.8 10.0 10.8 9.0 9.1

Other services %yr 23.6 8.9 13.0 19.4 7.6 8.3 8.2 7.9 5.1 7.0 5.6

Real GDP# %yr 5.8 5.9 6.3 8.6 7.3 9.4 8.8 8.9 8.3 7.8 7.7

Nominal GDP %yr 14.8 10.7 10.3 13.0 16.8 23.3 21.3 19.2 19.0 17.2 16.7

Implicit deflator %yr 9.0 4.8 4.1 4.3 9.4 13.9 12.4 10.3 10.6 9.5 9.0Dec–08 Mar–09 Jun–09 Sep–09 Dec–09 Mar–10 Jun–10 Sep–10 Dec–10 Mar–11 Jun–11

Private consumption %yr 6.7 6.6 6.6 8.5 7.0 6.6 9.5 8.9 8.6 8.0 6.3

Public consumption %yr 50.9 –2.8 21.3 37.5 9.6 6.2 6.7 6.4 1.9 4.9 2.1

Gross fixed capital formation %yr –2.0 –0.6 1.0 0.3 8.7 19.2 11.1 11.9 7.8 0.4 7.9

Exports %yr 8.8 –4.7 –11.8 –14.2 –4.9 10.6 9.8 10.7 24.8 25.0 24.3

Imports %yr 24.7 –6.9 –8.3 –16.1 0.6 21.1 15.2 11.6 0.4 10.3 23.6

Dec–08 Mar–09 Jun–09 Sep–09 Dec–09 Mar–10 Jun–10 Sep–10 Dec–10 Mar–11 Jun–11

Shares of GDP*Private consumption % 61.7 55.4 61.5 60.2 60.5 52.4 61.7 60.1 60.1 52.6 60.5

Investment^ % 34.5 35.8 36.4 37.6 36.4 39.8 37.4 38.7 36.0 37.8 37.8

Gross implied savings % 30.3 35.6 34.9 34.5 32.9 36.4 34.1 34.1 33.7 36.6 34.5

Exports % 22.0 20.2 21.1 20.8 19.2 19.9 21.2 21.1 21.9 23.1 24.3

Imports % 30.4 24.5 27.4 28.1 28.0 26.4 28.9 28.7 25.7 27.0 33.0

Dec–08 Mar–09 Jun–09 Sep–09 Dec–09 Mar–10 Jun–10 Sep–10 Dec–10 Mar–11 Jun–11

Central fiscal situationRevenue growth %yr 10.4 –0.3 –5.3 –8.3 –1.5 6.0 32.2 34.6 38.7 38.7 –2.2

Expenditure growth %yr 24.0 24.0 30.0 32.2 19.0 15.9 17.3 13.2 11.0 17.0 13.9

Central revenue deficit % GDP 3.6 4.8 5.3 6.1 5.7 5.5 3.8 3.7 2.9 3.4 4.9

Central government debt % GDP 51.9 53.8 53.6 55.5 55.1 52.0 51.5 50.5 49.7 48.8 49.1

Dec–08 Mar–09 Jun–09 Sep–09 Dec–09 Mar–10 Jun–10 Sep–10 Dec–10 Mar–11 Jun–11

Balance of paymentsCurrent account USDbn –11.9 –0.4 –4.2 –9.2 –12.2 –12.8 –12.1 –16.8 –10.0 –5.4 –14.2

Merchandise balance USDbn –35.0 –20.2 –26.3 –29.6 –30.9 –31.6 –31.9 –37.3 –31.5 –29.9 –35.5

Invisibles balance USDbn 23.1 19.8 22.1 20.4 18.7 18.8 19.8 20.5 21.5 24.5 21.3

Direct investment balance USDbn 0.7 4.3 4.8 7.5 3.0 3.4 2.9 3.0 0.6 0.6 7.2Portfolio investment balance USDbn –5.8 –2.7 8.3 9.7 5.7 8.8 4.6 19.2 6.3 0.2 2.5

Net loans USDbn 0.4 –0.8 –1.4 3.1 5.7 5.9 9.0 6.6 6.3 5.9 6.4

Overall balance USDbn –17.9 0.3 0.1 9.4 1.8 2.1 3.7 3.3 4.0 2.0 5.4

Current account % GDP –4.2 –0.1 –1.5 –3.1 –3.5 –3.4 –3.3 –4.6 –2.3 –1.2 –3.3

2009 2010 2011

Mar–09 Jun–09 Sep–09 Dec–09 Mar–10 Jun–10 Sep–10 Dec–10 Mar–11 Jun–11 Sep–11

Corporate sector (net balances)RBI survey business conditions 21.1 11.2 24.2 39.8 44.9 41.2 41.5 47.5 50.1 41.4 39.8

RBI survey financial conditions 16.4 8.4 20.0 33.5 39.3 36.3 34.1 39.6 41.1 33.4 30.6

RBI survey capacity utilisation – level –7.4 –20.8 –12.1 –3.8 1.3 1.6 5.8 7.2 9.5 4.4 25.0

RBI survey profit margins –12.9 –18.6 –13.4 –2.8 1.1 3.2 3.1 9.2 8.3 3.8 2.5

Dun & Bradstreet optimism index 95.7 93.8 132.1 143.2 137.3 142.8 150.0 163.5 171.2 183.3 143.6

Sources: CEIC, Westpac Economics, government agencies. # Production basis at factor cost. * Expenditure basis at market prices. ̂ Includes inventories & valuables.