feb 20 2015 tn 74938

574
From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Maryanna Foskett To: Energy - Docket Optical System Subject: DRECP NEPA/CEQA Date: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM Feb 20, 2015 Mr. Chris Beale 1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEW EO-01 Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 Dear Mr. Beale, As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewable energy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way. With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks, wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, I strongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order to better protect its public resources: * Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas, and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda Mountain Solar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locations for the project abound. * Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death Valley National Park by designating the landscape as National Conservation Lands. * Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development in the Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in this region from further threats and protect important habitat for desert bighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise. * Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to be designated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoise research natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass area should not be considered for DFAs. * Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting the protection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors, and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, Salt Creek, and Bonanza Spring. * Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite the significant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draft does not include discussion of how renewable energy projects will impact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-rich neighboring lands. Thank you for standing up for the California Desert! Sincerely, DOCKETED California Energy Commission FEB 20 2015 TN 74938 09-RENEW EO-1

Upload: others

Post on 16-Jul-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Maryanna FoskettTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

DOCKETEDCalifornia Energy Commission

FEB 20 2015

TN 74938

09-RENEW EO-1

Page 2: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Maryanna Foskett101 Brantwood RdArlington, MA 02476-8005

Page 3: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Brenda FreyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

You can use your position to save them and make sure they are there forhumans and wildlife. Do not let them get destroyed.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.

Page 4: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Sincerely,

Brenda

Sincerely,

Ms. Brenda Frey4536 Seneca StWest Seneca, NY 14224-3139

Page 5: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kate InmanTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 6: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Kate InmanMeadowbrook DriveFort Collins, CO 80521-4341

Page 7: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Rene LambertTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 8: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Rene LambertWard StreetBerkeley, CA 94703

Page 9: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Thor SognnaesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 10: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Thor Sognnaes17231 Keelson Ln Apt EHuntington Beach, CA 92647-5981(714) 375-9696

Page 11: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of John WardTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 12: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. John Ward13377 Algoma Ave NECedar Springs, MI 49319-9199(616) 240-2432

Page 13: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jessica MeansTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:28 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 14: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Jessica Means3771 Brice Run RdRandallstown, MD 21133-3835

Page 15: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Carolyn CroomTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 16: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Carolyn Croom2502 Albata AveAustin, TX 78757-2103(512) 459-8063

Page 17: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of David KnightTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:17 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 18: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. David Knight200 Avenue K SEApt 170Winter Haven, FL 33880-4041(555) 555-5555

Page 19: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Rebecca KeatonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:28 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 20: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Rebecca Keaton1321 Bonnie DrTallahassee, FL 32304-1213

Page 21: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Debra NixTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:17 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 22: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Debra NixPO Box 808Kihei, HI 96753-0808(808) 879-9391

Page 23: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Janet DunhamTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:27 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 24: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Janet Dunham291 Owings Creek RdHamilton, MT 59840-9539

Page 25: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Tanya ReneltTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:18 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 26: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Tanya Renelt4230 N Ashland AveChicago, IL 60613-1264

Page 27: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Christa HeckTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:36 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 28: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Christa HeckPO Box 853Lake Elsinore, CA 92531-0853

Page 29: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kenneth BickelTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:21 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 30: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Kenneth Bickel1201 Michael DrPittsburgh, PA 15227-3921

Page 31: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Joe RiveraTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:18 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 32: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Joe Rivera658 W Hammel StMonterey Park, CA 91754-6909

Page 33: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lorraine HeagyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:14 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 34: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Lorraine Heagy6 Sussex PlLititz, PA 17543-1039

Page 35: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sandy LynchTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:19 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 36: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Sandy Lynch6425 Clover Blossom Ln NEBremerton, WA 98311-9523(360) 930-1996

Page 37: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Karen DemariaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:55 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 38: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Karen Demaria250 W Merrick Rd Apt 2fFreeport, NY 11520-3310

Page 39: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Thomas McvayTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:19 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 40: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Thomas Mcvay33235 Zeiders RdMenifee, CA 92584-9614

Page 41: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Marcie MottTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:55 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 42: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Marcie Mott4816 Madonna AveChattanooga, TN 37412-2946

Page 43: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Margaret StefanickTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 44: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Margaret Stefanick15958 Ouray RdPine, CO 80470-9015(303) 725-8650

Page 45: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Brandi MccauleyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:20 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 46: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Brandi Mccauley6215 Woodland RdDes Moines, IA 50312-1245

Page 47: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Ralph TobinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 48: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Ralph Tobin1745 Scenery Hill RdFort Worth, TX 76103-1433

Page 49: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Andrea LewisTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:20 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 50: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Andrea Lewis177 Sparrow DrHamilton, NJ 08690-2459(908) 227-6988

Page 51: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of William DavisTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:55 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 52: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. William Davis114 Charlotte DrShelbyville, TN 37160-4403(931) 684-0836

Page 53: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sonya KingTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:22 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 54: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Sonya King13 Dareheights DriveBeverly Hills, CA 90213(042) 026-4690

Page 55: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Leslie TateTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:54 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 56: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Leslie Tate3517 Fairlomas RdNational City, CA 91950-8215(619) 428-7200

Page 57: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Nicole SylvesterTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:54 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 58: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Nicole Sylvester4428 Los Arboles DrLas Cruces, NM 88011-0901(575) 522-4307

Page 59: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Bill HammTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:22 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 60: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Bill Hamm5671a Suzanne LnTheodore, AL 36582-8173(251) 285-2805

Page 61: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Valerie LizarragaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:22 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 62: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Valerie Lizarraga865 W Ashiya RdMontebello, CA 90640-2563

Page 63: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Michael PetersonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:54 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 64: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Michael Peterson926 Jamestown AveSan Francisco, CA 94124-3515

Page 65: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Todd ProvinoTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:54 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 66: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Todd Provino1727 S Indiana Ave Apt 314Chicago, IL 60616-1369(415) 290-0065

Page 67: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lynn LevineTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:22 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

This is so very important: as someone who cares about our Californiadesert and our renewable energy future, it is essential that the 22.5million acre Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized ina thoughtful way. With this in mind and with the goal of protecting ournational parks, wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for futuregenerations, I strongly encourage you to improve this important plan inorder to better protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

So often people think that losing one small species is no big deal butit is. In small increments we are ending life as we know it .

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Page 68: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Sincerely,

Ms. Lynn Levine1941 Ewing Ave SMinneapolis, MN 55416-3625(612) 920-8991

Page 69: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Nan BuckleyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:54 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 70: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Nan Buckley1512 Waterford DrZionsville, IN 46077-3817

Page 71: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Patrick DonnellyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:25 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 72: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Patrick DonnellyPO Box 6Shoshone, CA 92384-0006(760) 852-4339

Page 73: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jack DomanTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:54 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

I am a voter who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thanks and blesssings for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 74: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Jack Doman139 Sandra CtNewbury Park, CA 91320-4306(805) 480-1167

Page 75: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Eric ZakinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:25 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 76: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Eric Zakin4145 George Ave Apt 1San Mateo, CA 94403-4720

Page 77: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Deo SchluppTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:53 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 78: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Deo Schlupp5194 Zinnia CtArvada, CO 80002-1747(303) 424-4847

Page 79: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Patricia OrlinskiTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:29 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 80: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Patricia Orlinski10511 W Kingswood CirSun City, AZ 85351-2246(623) 876-1525

Page 81: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Allen ElliottTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:31 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 82: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Allen ElliottPO Box 743La Conner, WA 98257-0743

Page 83: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Rita MccabeTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:12 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 84: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Rita Mccabe1140 Blanchan AveLa Grange Park, IL 60526-1201708354551

Page 85: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Cathleen HauensteinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:20 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 86: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Cathleen Hauenstein13370 Huntington CirApple Valley, MN 55124-9459(952) 255-8518

Page 87: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Dogan OzkanTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 88: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Dogan Ozkanvaryemez sokak no:10 yenisehir mahallesibeyogluistanbul turkey, AK 99701(541) 644-7217

Page 89: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Ken GoldsmithTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 90: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Ken Goldsmith2231 Cloud Cover LnRaleigh, NC 27614-6603(860) 933-4116

Page 91: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jamie PolczynskiTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:32 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 92: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Jamie Polczynski2305 N Major AveChicago, IL 60639-2935(773) 000-0000

Page 93: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Abigail BatesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:53 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 94: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Abigail Bates3706 Motor AveApt 35Los Angeles, CA 90034-6424

Page 95: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Cliff WilkinsonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:51 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 96: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Cliff Wilkinson1104 E Taylor StPhoenix, AZ 85006-3362

Page 97: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Elizabeth MccormackTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:53 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 98: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Elizabeth Mccormack911 Dennis CirHarrisburg, PA 17111-3222

Page 99: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mary Faith PhillipsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:52 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 100: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Mary Faith PhillipsPO Box 482Sparr, FL 32192-0482

Page 101: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Patricia Flynn-WilliamsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:52 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 102: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Patricia Flynn-WilliamsPO Box 30227Midland, TX 79712-0227(432) 563-1517

Page 103: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mara BagierTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:55 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 104: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Mara Bagier734 W 23rd StSan Pedro, CA 90731-5806(310) 833-7233

Page 105: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Dee Renee EricksTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:52 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 106: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Dee Renee Ericks622 S Francis StPort Angeles, WA 98362-6433(360) 452-2726

Page 107: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Barbara MellonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:56 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 108: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Barbara Mellon56 Calle Cadiz Unit BLaguna Woods, CA 92637-3948

Page 109: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Rachel DefauwTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:52 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 110: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Rachel Defauw9239 Villa EntradaNew Port Richey, FL 34655-1732

Page 111: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of R WilliamsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:57 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 112: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. R WilliamsEagleIndianapolis, IN 462789500

Page 113: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of George RyanTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:58 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 114: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. George Ryan12 Browns LnOld Lyme, CT 06371-1802(860) 434-3970

Page 115: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jude MisurelliTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:43:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 116: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Jude Misurelli435 Upper Snuff Mill RowHockessin, DE 19707-9308(484) 371-8348

Page 117: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Ralph RiderTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:43:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 118: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Ralph Rider20315 Martin RdSaint Clair Shores, MI 48081-1044

Page 119: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lisa UchnoTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:58 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 120: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Lisa Uchno2091 Pontiac DrSylvan Lake, MI 48320-1761(248) 738-2596

Page 121: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Antoinette AmbrosioTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:43:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 122: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Antoinette Ambrosio225 Hermosa AveLong Beach, CA 90802-3900(562) 436-4559

Page 123: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of John CurryTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:59 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 124: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. John Curry5 Butterfield AveBellows Falls, VT 05101-1201

Page 125: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Celia ManessTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:43:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 126: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Celia Maness16510 Meadview StChesterfield, MO 63005-4813(636) 812-2282

Page 127: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Carol GaultTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:59 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 128: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Carol Gault1028 Kings Row StCarbondale, CO 81623-9691(970) 925-8696

Page 129: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Pat DuncanTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:11 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 130: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Pat Duncan1080 Carnival Ave NWLos Lunas, NM 87031-7473(505) 865-6502

Page 131: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mary GibbonsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 132: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Mary Gibbons53674 Huntington DrShelby Township, MI 48316-2030(248) 652-4403

Page 133: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Renee ShipleyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:11:59 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 134: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Renee Shipley7107 Broadway # 185Lemon Grove, CA 91945-1436

Page 135: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kimberly FreyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 136: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Kimberly Frey5 Tims LnHockessin, DE 19707-9189(856) 869-8489

Page 137: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jody MillerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:12:01 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 138: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Jody Miller1008 Jewett StHouston, TX 77009-3718(713) 204-2487

Page 139: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Natasha ExnerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:43:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 140: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Natasha Exner2836 Gillet AveConcord, CA 94520-5406

Page 141: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Linda MilletTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:12:01 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 142: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Linda Millet2040 Peach Orchard DrApt 24Falls Church, VA 22043-2066(571) 356-7570

Page 143: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Judy HillTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:18 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 144: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Judy Hill13864-22 Mile RoadShelby Township, MI 48315(586) 247-1065

Page 145: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of David BrayfieldTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:12:02 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 146: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. David Brayfield915 W Harvard StChampaign, IL 61821-2534(000) 000-0000

Page 147: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sheila DesmondTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:43:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 148: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Sheila Desmond3148 Piper CtCameron Park, CA 95682-9130(530) 676-3426

Page 149: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Charles AshbaughTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:10 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 150: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Charles Ashbaugh1202 W Park LnSanta Ana, CA 92706-1423(714) 558-2708

Page 151: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mary Ann and Mr.Frank GraffagninoTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:43:02 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As people who care about our California desert and our renewable energyfuture, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre Desert RenewableEnergy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way. With this inmind and with the goal of protecting our national parks, wildernessareas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, we stronglyencourage you to improve this important plan in order to better protectits public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

PLEASE TAKE THE RIGHT, FAIR, JUST, HUMANE AND HEALTHY ACTION ANDPROTECT DESERT PARKS, PLACE AND WILDLIFE FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS>

Page 152: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Sincerely,

Ms. Mary Ann and Mr.Frank Graffagnino10207 E Calle Pueblo EstrellaTucson, AZ 85747-5171(520) 820-9471

Page 153: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Helen MalinauskasTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:10 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 154: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Helen MalinauskasW2702 Fox LnMontello, WI 53949-9027(608) 297-2358

Page 155: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Arthur LapiteTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:43:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 156: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Arthur Lapite211 E 18th StApt 4hNew York, NY 10003-3624(212) 475-3336

Page 157: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Roger KohlerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:10 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 158: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Roger Kohler38 N Almaden BlvdSan Jose, CA 95110-2720

Page 159: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Maryann PiccioneTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 160: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Maryann Piccione2202 Arcadia RdHoliday, FL 34690-4311

Page 161: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sherry HendersonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:10 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 162: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Sherry Henderson14884 Hopewell RdAlpharetta, GA 30004-6928(770) 475-0294

Page 163: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mary Brenda RiontinoTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 164: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Mary Brenda Riontino1200 N Shore Dr NE Unit 301St Petersburg, FL 33701-1446(727) 895-2022

Page 165: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of John StickneyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 166: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. John Stickney30 Shell RdMill Valley, CA 94941-1550

Page 167: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Alice BartholomewTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:56 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 168: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Alice Bartholomew415 Wall StElmira, NY 14905-2132(607) 734-6037

Page 169: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sidney HaneyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 170: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Sidney Haney1285 Nice DrLexington, KY 40504-1515(859) 806-8605

Page 171: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Janette WellsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:55 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 172: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Janette Wells1218 SW Tanner CtBend, OR 97702-2935

Page 173: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lesley PattonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:12:17 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 174: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Lesley PattonPO Box 1065Kapaau, HI 96755-1065(808) 889-5002

Page 175: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Linda RussellTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:53 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

I love the California desert and our renewable energy future. It isessential the 22.5 million acre Desert Renewable Energy ConservationPlan be finalized thoughtfully. With this in mind and with the goal ofprotecting our national parks, wilderness areas, wildlife and wildplaces for future generations, I urge you to improve this importantplan in order to better protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by NOT allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP. Better locations forthe project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Ms. Linda Russell

Page 176: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

PO Box 4303Santa Rosa, CA 95402-4303(707) 583-2395

Page 177: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Vicky ForrestTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 178: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Vicky Forrest9832 Haverstick RdIndianapolis, IN 46280-1854(317) 705-1605

Page 179: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Andre CavalierTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:12:18 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 180: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Andre Cavalier38 E Spring StWinooski, VT 05404-1833

Page 181: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kathy BibeauTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:12:27 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 182: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Kathy Bibeau1615 Waterton CirWhitehouse, TX 75791-9552

Page 183: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Season JonesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:26 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 184: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Season Jones2092 Ferris RdColumbus, OH 43224-2346

Page 185: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Deirdre CovalTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:10 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 186: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Deirdre Coval338 Columbine St Apt A6Soldotna, AK 99669-7558(907) 740-1981

Page 187: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Michele PascoeTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:12:33 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 188: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Michele Pascoe3110 Argonaut AveRocklin, CA 95677-1823(916) 630-7442

Page 189: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Beate HolmesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:12:37 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 190: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Beate Holmes102 Deerfield DrEnterprise, AL 36330-2225(334) 379-7686

Page 191: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Helen TousterTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 192: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Helen Touster624 Liberty St Apt 216Clarion, PA 16214-1165(814) 226-4632

Page 193: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of William KrinskyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan be finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoises.

* Do not allow renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willaffect the vistas within these parks, clear night skies, andwildlife-rich neighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 194: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. William Krinsky5 Norway RdNorth Haven, CT 06473-2932(203) 288-2360

Page 195: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Ken WardTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:12:39 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 196: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Ken Ward140 Bleecker St Apt 1Gloversville, NY 12078-2389

Page 197: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sara MillerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 198: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Sara Miller1226 Trail CtMukwonago, WI 53149-9551

Page 199: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lynn BarbieriTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:12:40 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 200: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Lynn Barbieri168 Division StGreat Barrington, MA 01230-1179

Page 201: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Carole DuckworthTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:41:51 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 202: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Carole Duckworth3105 12th St NSaint Petersburg, FL 33704-1907(727) 289-6328

Page 203: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Alejandra BenitoTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key deseret bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 204: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Alejandra Benito12391 McGregor BlvdFort Myers, FL 33919-3143

Page 205: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Frank MieleTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 206: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Frank Miele1918 Biltmore St NWWashington, DC 20009-1510

Page 207: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Eli SolesbyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 208: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Eli SolesbyPO Box 553Chesnee, SC 29323-0553

Page 209: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jackie DubaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 210: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Jackie Duba407 E 9th StLeadville, CO 80461-3005

Page 211: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Forest FrasieurTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 212: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Forest Frasieur454 E E StBenicia, CA 94510-3288(707) 292-8401

Page 213: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jeanette KingTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 214: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Jeanette King4205 Colgate WayLivermore, CA 94550-3414(925) 443-0318

Page 215: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Judy MazowieckiTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 216: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Judy Mazowiecki1645 Avenida SelvaFullerton, CA 92833-1559

Page 217: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Theodore PanitzTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 218: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Theodore Panitz2118 N 160th StShoreline, WA 98133-5809(206) 708-1772

Page 219: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Randall AyersTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 220: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Randall Ayers14000 SE Cascade Park Dr Apt 30Vancouver, WA 98683-8707

Page 221: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Adrienne SimmonsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 222: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Adrienne Simmons488 Agate WayRedding, CA 96003-3452

Page 223: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Dale GoldsteinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 224: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Dale Goldstein50 Constable LnLevittown, NY 11756-4338(516) 731-6380

Page 225: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Richard PhillipsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 226: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Richard Phillips3499 Oakridge RdNeenah, WI 54956-9608(920) 836-2199

Page 227: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sharon GriffenTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 228: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Sharon Griffen3210 Orange StSan Jose, CA 95127-1029

Page 229: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Heather HalvorsonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 230: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Heather Halvorson5301 Admiral DrMonona, WI 53716-2137

Page 231: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Christine BercierTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 232: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Christine Bercier10408 Sunny Ranch AveLas Vegas, NV 89129-8106(702) 396-9966

Page 233: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jason BaldockTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 234: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Jason Baldock16 Grampian WayDorchester, MA 02125-1034

Page 235: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Bennie ScottTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 236: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Bennie Scott300 Taylor StSmithville, TX 78957-2527(512) 674-5046

Page 237: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Frances OnestiTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 238: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Frances Onesti4564 W 171st StLawndale, CA 90260-3404

Page 239: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Greg SchwartzTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 240: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Greg Schwartz4162 Sycamore DrSan Diego, CA 92105-4562(216) 394-6572

Page 241: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kat BowleyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 242: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Kat Bowley515 E Crossville RdRoswell, GA 30075-3087

Page 243: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Karen FitzgeraldTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 244: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Karen Fitzgerald459 11th Ave Apt 2San Francisco, CA 94118-2926

Page 245: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Scott WhiteTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 246: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Scott White1970 State Route 534Southington, OH 44470-9514(330) 898-9130

Page 247: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Rosalyn RohloffTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 248: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Rosalyn Rohloff4450 Holman StGolden, CO 80403-1854

Page 249: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of David TilliTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 250: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. David Tilli75 Four Leaf RdLevittown, PA 19056-1922(215) 945-5533

Page 251: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Maureen OnealTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 252: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Maureen Oneal9100 SW 80th AvePortland, OR 97223-8981(503) 293-1796

Page 253: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Pat DoskyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 254: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Pat Dosky97 Franklin AveOcean Grove, NJ 07756-1039

Page 255: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Alida BockinoTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 256: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Alida Bockino1104 Pine Crest RdMoscow, ID 83843-7444(208) 882-3378

Page 257: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sherri FryerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 258: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Sherri Fryer910 Sage StClymer, PA 15728-1044(000) 000-0000

Page 259: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of debra lynn andersonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 260: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. debra lynn anderson1870 Crotona AveBronx, NY 10457-6409(347) 666-3540

Page 261: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of E. Lehuanani PhillipsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 262: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss E. Lehuanani Phillips23502 Magic Mountain Pkwy Apt 1505Valencia, CA 91355-1312

Page 263: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Barbara JohnsonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 264: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Barbara Johnson35 Jeffords RdRush, NY 14543-9774

Page 265: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Nancy GregoryTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 266: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Nancy Gregory7548 S Crocker CtLittleton, CO 80120-4405

Page 267: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mark KlugiewiczTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 268: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Mark Klugiewicz32905 Sunrise DrMagnolia, TX 77354-2628

Page 269: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Marshall AdamsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 270: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Marshall Adams6944 Avenida RotellaSan Jose, CA 95139-1109(408) 629-1379

Page 271: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Karen KirkTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 272: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Karen Kirk67 Lamont DrCogan Station, PA 17728-9111(570) 998-9942

Page 273: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lawrence FreyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who grew up in Southern California I believe the Californiadesert is both beautiful as well as an important environmental asset Inregards to the future of renewable energy. It is essential that the22.5 million acre Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan isfinalized in a thoughtful way to both preserve the former andintelligently utilize the latter. With this in mind and with the goalof protecting our national parks, wilderness areas, wildlife and wildplaces for future generations, I strongly encourage you to improve thisimportant plan in order to better protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Page 274: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Sincerely,

Mr. Lawrence Frey219 W Washington StVilla Park, IL 60181-2826(630) 291-8075

Page 275: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of kassy ellefsonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 276: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. kassy ellefson9248 Mary Ave NWSeattle, WA 98117-2329(260) 445-9482

Page 277: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Patricia BurgertTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 278: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Patricia Burgert516 Walters DrWake Forest, NC 27587-6177(704) 644-9535

Page 279: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Angell ChisholmTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 280: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Angell Chisholm8622 Hume AveSaint Louis, MO 63114-4521(314) 426-6901

Page 281: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kathy PriceTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 282: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Kathy PricePO Box 1062Rockwall, TX 75087-1062(903) 259-4085

Page 283: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Trevor SelfTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 284: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Trevor Self4708 Carter LnAustin, TX 78744-2010

Page 285: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Cathy BartonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 286: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Cathy Barton517 Kansala DrAnnapolis, MD 21401-8101

Page 287: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Beth DohertyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 288: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Beth Doherty4224 Garnet DrMiddletown, MD 21769-7543

Page 289: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Shawn LewisTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 290: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Shawn Lewis11703 Main RdAkron, NY 14001-9757

Page 291: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Leigh CastellonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 292: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Leigh Castellon5630 Sacramento AveRichmond, CA 94804-5606

Page 293: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Wes WeaverTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 294: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Wes Weaver342 Dogwood KnlBoone, NC 28607-8134(828) 264-9316

Page 295: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Shonna MyersTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 296: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Shonna Myers3351 Monroe St SBriarwood, ND 58104-6986

Page 297: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Ronald TalianoTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 298: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Ronald Taliano33315 Fairport DrAvon Lake, OH 44012-2376

Page 299: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Patricia VazquezTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 300: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Patricia VazquezTaller 791, Edif. 7, #402Jardin BalbuenaMexico City, None 15900525524564919

Page 301: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Alan HarrisTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 302: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Alan Harris552 Trinidad LnFoster City, CA 94404-3725

Page 303: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Michelle SteppTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 304: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Michelle SteppPO Box 257Pmb 6288Olympia, WA 98507-0257(253) 414-7487

Page 305: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Loretta KernsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 306: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Loretta Kerns105 Brent PlCortland, OH 44410-1300(330) 637-1814

Page 307: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Eudell BossardTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 308: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Eudell Bossard331 E Long Acres DrHenderson, NV 89015-8117

Page 309: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Vicki MacinaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 310: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Vicki Macina510 Shelby StSandusky, OH 44870-2258

Page 311: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Michael ZellerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 312: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Michael Zeller273 McMillan RdGrosse Pointe Farms, MI 48236-3457(313) 885-5052

Page 313: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Maria De La Rosa-YoungTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 314: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Maria De La Rosa-Young5125 N Saint Louis AveChicago, IL 60625-5508(773) 478-2745

Page 315: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of George EiselerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 316: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. George EiselerPO Box 26299Phoenix, AZ 85068-6299602326603

Page 317: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Donald BrockwayTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 318: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Donald Brockway255 Rollingwood DrAthens, GA 30605-3329(706) 549-3160

Page 319: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of K JacksonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 320: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. K Jackson408 N Pinon StOlathe, KS 66061-5909

Page 321: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Tiffany InoTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 322: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Tiffany Ino7840 Sun LnRosemead, CA 91770-3588

Page 323: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Rusty RollingsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 324: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Rusty Rollings8 Webb PlPalm Coast, FL 32164-7770

Page 325: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Yolanda MacleanTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 326: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Yolanda MacleanPO Box 4034Winter Park, FL 32793-4034

Page 327: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kimberly FreyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 328: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Kimberly Frey5 Tims LnHockessin, DE 19707-9189(856) 869-8489

Page 329: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Katarzyna GawronTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 330: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Katarzyna GawronNiepodlegoci 66/44NiepodlegociInowrocaw, None 88-100600384640

Page 331: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Karen BoehlerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 332: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Karen Boehler33 Mark RdRoswell, NM 88201-8809

Page 333: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Katherine Barrett ZywanTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 334: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Katherine Barrett Zywan3914 Beech AveBaltimore, MD 21211-2224

Page 335: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of John CairnsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 336: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. John Cairns704 Erlen RdPlymouth Meeting, PA 19462-2429(555) 555-5555

Page 337: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Darlene FalkTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 338: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Darlene Falk148 Brooksong TrlVilas, NC 28692-6006

Page 339: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Marlene HarrellTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:45 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 340: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Marlene Harrell196 Cedar CircleSaint Marie, MT 59231(406) 524-3721

Page 341: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of June MacArthurTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 342: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. June MacArthur1045 Hillandale Dr EPort Orchard, WA 98366-3830

Page 343: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Heather OsborneTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:12:02 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 344: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Heather OsbornePO Box 688Berkeley Springs, WV 25411-0688

Page 345: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mikail BarronTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:12:02 PM

Feb 21, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 346: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Mikail Barron110 Arrow LnFelton, CA 95018-9624

Page 347: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mike WeberTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 348: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Mike Weber210 Berea 2Jefferson, TX 75657-6520

Page 349: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Vaiva GriskaiteTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 350: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Vaiva Griskaite13210 N Day RdGrass Valley, CA 95945-7940

Page 351: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Marlena LovewellTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 352: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Marlena Lovewell41052 162nd St ELancaster, CA 93535-7306

Page 353: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Bradley BornsteinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 354: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Bradley Bornstein709 Lavergne AveWilmette, IL 60091-2027(847) 251-9121

Page 355: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Dawn AlbaneseTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 356: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Dawn Albanese156 Basswood DrElk Grove Village, IL 60007-1718(630) 965-5605

Page 357: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Harold WilkinsonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 358: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Harold Wilkinson210 Park AveSwarthmore, PA 19081-1728(610) 543-8286

Page 359: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Michael CTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:00 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 360: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Michael C124 Ross RdKennebunk, ME 04043-6582

Page 361: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Rich CsengeTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:00 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 362: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Rich Csenge38 Main StTopsham, ME 04086-1218(435) 644-3735

Page 363: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Julie HalesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:00 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 364: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Julie Hales21251 Kahlert StCastro Valley, CA 94546-6213

Page 365: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Joseph FongTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:44 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 366: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Joseph Fong432 W 47th St Apt 2eNew York, NY 10036-2325

Page 367: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Byron FogelTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:00 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 368: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Byron Fogel8210 Wisner AveVan Nuys, CA 91402-4518(818) 782-9443

Page 369: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Peter BodleaenderTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 370: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Peter Bodleaender3040 Silver Lea TerLos Angeles, CA 90039-3034

Page 371: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lawrence LoosmoreTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 372: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Lawrence Loosmore504 Haven Manor DrNew Haven, MO 63068-1225

Page 373: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Elisabeth PriceTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 374: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Elisabeth Price2809 Carolina St NEAlbuquerque, NM 87110-3311(505) 881-4520

Page 375: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Scott FinamoreTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 376: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Scott Finamore3122 W Higgins PlCitrus Springs, FL 34433-7125

Page 377: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Tim GoldenTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 378: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Tim Golden4631 Rockwood CtLincoln, NE 68516-5114

Page 379: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Maritte (Mara) RahavTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 380: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Maritte (Mara) Rahav450 W 42nd StApt 21mNew York, NY 10036-6896(917) 675-6793

Page 381: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Tim BaxterTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 382: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Tim Baxter2159 Homewood StMobile, AL 36606-1944(251) 478-8920

Page 383: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Stacey EakesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 384: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Stacey Eakes2340 SE Tecumseh RdTecumseh, KS 66542-9324

Page 385: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kristina PetersonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:57 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 386: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Kristina Peterson7915 199th St SWEdmonds, WA 98026-6543

Page 387: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Denise ValentinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:36 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 388: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Denise Valentin3323 NW 69th StFort Lauderdale, FL 33309-1211

Page 389: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Norm StanleyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:57 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 390: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Norm Stanley39796 Pine Bench RdYucaipa, CA 92399-9543

Page 391: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Tim MooreTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:57 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 392: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Tim Moore31147 Blue Jay CtCoarsegold, CA 93614-9635(559) 683-2512

Page 393: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lee DiggsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:56 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 394: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Lee Diggs8092 Hartington DrNavarre, FL 32566-4171

Page 395: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Sara SchackTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:56 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 396: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Sara Schack184 Broad StCharleston, SC 29401-2429

Page 397: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Melanie LeeTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:56 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 398: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Melanie Lee950 Tivoli AveEugene, OR 97404-1544

Page 399: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Julie HendersonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:26 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 400: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Julie Henderson1411 S De Soto AveTampa, FL 33606-3112

Page 401: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Maryellen AdamsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:11:56 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 402: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Maryellen Adams21408 Ridgecroft DrBrookeville, MD 20833-1817

Page 403: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Manuela KowittTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 404: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Manuela Kowitt8802 Bonds Grove Church RdWaxhaw, NC 28173-8346(704) 844-6265

Page 405: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jason SteadmonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:07 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 406: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Jason Steadmon677 Avenue MBoulder City, NV 89005-3057

Page 407: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of James HigginsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:34 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 408: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. James Higgins1259 Highland RdKeeseville, NY 12944-2326

Page 409: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Doug SmithTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 410: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Doug Smith8137 Perry St Apt 55Overland Park, KS 66204-4787

Page 411: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Alice ShieldsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Protect our sensitive lands! We can have thriving Green Energy inplaces that are not so sensitive.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Page 412: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Sincerely,

Dr. Alice Shields550 W 45th St Apt 1013New York, NY 10036-3795(212) 666-1394

Page 413: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Bess KaterinskyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 414: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Bess Katerinsky57 Wellington RdLowrBuffalo, NY 14216-2810(716) 352-3580

Page 415: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of C KTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:42 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 416: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. C KN3367 Juniper RdLake Geneva, WI 53147-2968(262) 248-9109

Page 417: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Marilee MurrayTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 418: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Marilee Murray47008 N 27th AveNew River, AZ 85087-8084(623) 465-5764

Page 419: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Stephanie CormierTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:06 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 420: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Stephanie Cormier2601 Frankford RdApt 622Dallas, TX 75287-4507

Page 421: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Deb BarrTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 422: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Deb Barr67979 Ridge WayMontrose, CO 81403-7777

Page 423: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Cynthia CalkinsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 424: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Cynthia Calkins17526 149th Ave SERenton, WA 98058-8753

Page 425: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Marybeth ConradTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 426: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Marybeth Conrad1516 N Fernandez PlArlington Heights, IL 60004-3778

Page 427: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Irene LastraTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:24 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregio"n from further threats and protect important habitat fordesert bighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 428: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Irene Lastra540 Wesley RdSpringfield, PA 19064-2013(610) 544-5913

Page 429: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Leslie KilpatrickTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 430: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Leslie KilpatrickPO Box 871Odenville, AL 35120-0871(205) 960-7459

Page 431: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Susan Stevens-BriodyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:05 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 432: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Susan Stevens-Briody837 Cobblestone CtAshland, OR 97520-9111(480) 250-7511

Page 433: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lori StaytonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 434: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Lori StaytonValley VistaSherman Oaks, CA 91403-1441

Page 435: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jed HoltzmanTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 436: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Jed Holtzman847 Scott StSan Francisco, CA 94117-1640

Page 437: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lynn KouzelTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:33 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 438: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Lynn Kouzel779 W 20th StSan Pedro, CA 90731-5300

Page 439: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Carol MockTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:41 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 440: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Carol Mock287 Hirsch TerFremont, CA 94536-1601(510) 795-1182

Page 441: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Andrea ScuderTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 442: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Andrea Scuder175 W 92nd St Apt 6dNew York, NY 10025-7523

Page 443: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Diane FinleyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 444: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Diane Finley4236 New Moon CirSanta Fe, NM 87507-2579

Page 445: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Julie RobertsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 446: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Julie Roberts3340 Richland DrApt 4Santa Barbara, CA 93105-3260

Page 447: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of William WollnerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 448: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. William Wollner323 E Magnolia StStockton, CA 95202-1512(209) 948-5918

Page 449: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Margaret CatheyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 450: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Margaret Cathey3286 E Kimball RdGilbert, AZ 85297-9423(480) 830-8580

Page 451: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Nasrin MazujiTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:03 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 452: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Nasrin Mazuji3498 Little Hill LnSierra Vista, AZ 85635-8101(520) 335-6503

Page 453: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Robert BeverlyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 454: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Robert BeverlyPO Box 1198Orange, TX 77631-1198

Page 455: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Terry FrewinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:23 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 456: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Terry FrewinPO Box 31086Santa Barbara, CA 93130-1086

Page 457: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jenny BramletteTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:02 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 458: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Jenny Bramlette5909 Estes LnWesley Chapel, FL 33545-4332(813) 907-9111

Page 459: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Peter KeiserTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:02 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 460: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Peter Keiser131 W Seneca StManlius, NY 13104-2444

Page 461: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Colleen KandusTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:02 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 462: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Colleen Kandus29779 Marhill CirTemecula, CA 92591-1809

Page 463: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of R-Laurraine TutihasiTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:41 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 464: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss R-Laurraine TutihasiPO Box 5323Oracle, AZ 85623-5323(520) 896-2058

Page 465: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Dorr BugbeeTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:02 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 466: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Dorr Bugbee21196 North AveBattle Creek, MI 49017-9451(269) 965-6877

Page 467: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Meigs MathesonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:32 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Ms. Meigs Matheson1914 Clemens RdOakland, CA 94602-1914

Page 468: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Dennis SchwarzauerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 469: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Dennis Schwarzauer606 Mallison PlRidgeland, MS 39157-2854

Page 470: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Joe SalazarTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 471: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Joe Salazar610 Cherrywood DrSanta Rosa, CA 95407-7514

Page 472: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Paul WestTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 473: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Paul West1437 Regency CtFort Collins, CO 80526-3422(970) 225-0508

Page 474: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Alec HendricksonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 475: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Alec Hendrickson3219 W 44th StMinneapolis, MN 55410-1436

Page 476: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Barbara HolcombTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 477: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Barbara Holcomb7140 Railroad AveAdrian, MI 49221-9700(517) 445-2172

Page 478: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Timothy MaherTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:01 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 479: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Timothy Maher1124 N 44th StMilwaukee, WI 53208-2725

Page 480: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mike DotsonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:23 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 481: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Mike Dotson102 Anderson StApt BCarterville, IL 62918-1202(618) 889-5337

Page 482: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Margaret KeylinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:00 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 483: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Margaret Keylin304 N Woodlawn StDowns, IL 61736-9671

Page 484: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Norm WilmesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:00 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 485: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Norm Wilmes3120 Live Oak BlvdYuba City, CA 95991-8866

Page 486: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of John HolmesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:35 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 487: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. John Holmes1338 Douglass StSan Francisco, CA 94131-1830

Page 488: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Robert BurnsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:00 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 489: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Robert Burns1324 N 900 WOrem, UT 84057-2900(801) 224-4895

Page 490: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jan KillianTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:00 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 491: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Jan Killian2101 10th StCumberland, WI 54829-9791

Page 492: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Joshua JonesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 493: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Joshua Jones4232 Pavlov AveSan Diego, CA 92122-3721(858) 232-4973

Page 494: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Joyce BlomquistTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:30 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 495: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Joyce Blomquist1980 Skillman Ave WRoseville, MN 55113-5403(651) 631-0688

Page 496: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Russell JamesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:04 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 497: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Russell James1845 Ramon RdWilmington, NC 28405-7709(910) 313-1518

Page 498: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Natasha ExnerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 499: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Natasha Exner1096 W Leland RdBay Point, CA 94565-4486

Page 500: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Moneca DunhamTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 501: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Moneca Dunham987 Lodgepole DrEvergreen, CO 80439-4608

Page 502: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Anna VictoriaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:59 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 503: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Anna Victoria1 Misty Morning DrColumbia, SC 29229-9084

Page 504: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Donald SchwartzTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 505: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Donald Schwartz2414 Sugarcone RdBaltimore, MD 21209-1034(410) 653-2629

Page 506: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Michael MitsudaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:21 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 507: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Michael Mitsuda33210 Lake Oneida StFremont, CA 94555-1285

Page 508: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Diane KrassensteinTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 509: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Diane Krassenstein7617 Fillmore StPhiladelphia, PA 19111-2414

Page 510: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Robert OberdorfTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 511: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Robert Oberdorf8831 W Sunrise BlvdPlantation, FL 33322-5257(954) 533-1531

Page 512: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Dorothy DavisTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 513: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Dorothy DavisPO Box 166Pacific, WA 98047-0166(253) 804-4351

Page 514: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Ann ChaneyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 515: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Ann Chaney9822 Pear Tree CtBristow, VA 20136-2420(703) 367-9043

Page 516: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Michele MartinezTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:41:58 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 517: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss Michele Martinez23185 Santa Clara StHayward, CA 94541-7438

Page 518: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of James H. FitchTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:17 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 519: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. James H. FitchPO Box 26566Overland Park, KS 66225-6566(913) 735-7381

Page 520: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kathy GrievesTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:19 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 521: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Kathy Grieves7709 W Via Del SolPeoria, AZ 85383-3160(602) 686-1099

Page 522: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Justin HorstmannTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:18 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 523: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Justin Horstmann105 Walnut StDamiansville, IL 62215-1323

Page 524: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of vaiva griskaiteTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:17 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 525: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Miss vaiva griskaite2581 Fulton Square LnSacramento, CA 95821-2383

Page 526: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Todd DavisTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:17 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 527: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Todd Davis6513 Harding AvePortsmouth, OH 45662-5495

Page 528: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Leslie MolessaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:16 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 529: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Leslie Molessa6305 Moccasin Pass CtColorado Springs, CO 80919-4452

Page 530: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lilian BurchTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:16 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 531: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Lilian Burch7111 Woodmont Ave Apt 504Bethesda, MD 20815-6233

Page 532: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Mary HellerTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 533: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Mary Heller24 Thornwood DrPoughkeepsie, NY 12603-4633(845) 473-5451

Page 534: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Michele MorrisTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 535: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Michele Morris3304 Sudbury PlFort Wayne, IN 46815-6245(260) 486-7905

Page 536: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Richard StarlingTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:15 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 537: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Richard Starling3216 Hubbard RdCharlotte, NC 28269-2124

Page 538: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of John RoseTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:14 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 539: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. John Rose6813 Silkberry LnGoleta, CA 93117-5518

Page 540: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Tracy OuelletteTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:14 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 541: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Dr. Tracy Ouellette14078 Mactaggart AveBow, WA 98232-9246(360) 766-4490

Page 542: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Hazel PoolosTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:14 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Please honor and protect OUR wild and stunning arid lands!

Page 543: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Sincerely,

Mrs. Hazel Poolos42717 Caudle RdRichfield, NC 28137-9671

Page 544: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Heidi WesselsTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:13 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.

Each one of us has a responsibility to protect the earth &environment we have been given - let's make a lasting impression thatwill be here for future generations to appreciate.

How can our wildlife & precious environment survive without your& my help.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Ms. Heidi WesselsPO Box 1161Pacific Palisades, CA 90272-1161(310) 395-6608

Page 545: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Ryan CarterTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:13 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 546: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Ryan Carter1310 Desoto Falls Ct SWAtlanta, GA 30311-3663

Page 547: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of annie mcclureTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:12 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 548: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. annie mcclure18330 Wards Ferry RdSonora, CA 95370-7701

Page 549: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Margot LoweTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:12 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 550: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Margot Lowe4834 Northerly StOceanside, CA 92056-2101

Page 551: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Jon BergTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:11 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 552: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Jon Berg1708 Newton St NWApt 102Washington, DC 20010-6111

Page 553: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Alexander HonigsblumTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:11 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 554: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Alexander Honigsblum2649 Carroll StDubuque, IA 52001-1865

Page 555: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Maureen PorcelliTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:11 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 556: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Maureen Porcelli6115 Granton Ave Apt 10nNorth Bergen, NJ 07047-3329(201) 869-1390

Page 557: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of George DavisTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:11 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 558: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. George Davis4810 Brown Valley LnColorado Springs, CO 80918-4010

Page 559: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Luna CariagaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:11 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 560: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Luna Cariaga334 Genoa St Unit CMonrovia, CA 91016-4534

Page 561: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Kimberly FreyTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:11 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 562: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Kimberly Frey5 Tims LnHockessin, DE 19707-9189(856) 869-8489

Page 563: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Fred TashimaTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:11 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 564: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Fred Tashima12363 Herbert StLos Angeles, CA 90066-4914

Page 565: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Karen JohnsonTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:10 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 566: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Ms. Karen Johnson3365 S 900 EApt 1Salt Lake City, UT 84106-2078(801) 637-7614

Page 567: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Lascinda GoetschiusTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:10 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 568: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mrs. Lascinda Goetschius13-21 6th StFair Lawn, NJ 07410-1145

Page 569: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Peter SchultzTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 8:12:10 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our deserts and our renewable energy future,it is absolutely essential that the 22.5 million acre Desert RenewableEnergy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way. With this inmind and with the goal of protecting our national parks, wildernessareas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, I stronglyencourage you to improve this important plan in order to better protectits public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 570: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Peter Schultz501 Andrus RdDowners Grove, IL 60516-5128

Page 571: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Dennis BaldryTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:42:09 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 572: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Dennis Baldry1016 W 10th AveOshkosh, WI 54902-6212(920) 203-0296

Page 573: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

From: National Parks Conservation Association on behalf of Bernabe ContrerasTo: Energy - Docket Optical SystemSubject: DRECP NEPA/CEQADate: Friday, February 20, 2015 9:42:08 PM

Feb 20, 2015

Mr. Chris Beale

1516 Ninth Street, MS-46, Dockets Office, MS-4, Docket No. 09-RENEWEO-01Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

Dear Mr. Beale,

As someone who cares about our California desert and our renewableenergy future, it is essential that the 22.5 million acre DesertRenewable Energy Conservation Plan is finalized in a thoughtful way.With this in mind and with the goal of protecting our national parks,wilderness areas, wildlife and wild places for future generations, Istrongly encourage you to improve this important plan in order tobetter protect its public resources:

* Protect Mojave National Preserve, adjacent Wilderness Study Areas,and key desert bighorn sheep habitat by not allowing the Soda MountainSolar project to be sited next door to Mojave NP, as better locationsfor the project abound.

* Protect the remarkable Silurian Valley adjacent to Death ValleyNational Park by designating the landscape as National ConservationLands.

* Better protect Joshua Tree National Park by preventing development inthe Eagle Mountain region. We must safeguard public lands in thisregion from further threats and protect important habitat for desertbighorn sheep, golden eagles, and desert tortoise.

* Do not allow for renewable energy Development Focus Areas (DFA) to bedesignated in sensitive lands. The Lucerne region, the desert tortoiseresearch natural area, Cadiz dunes area, and the Mountain Pass areashould not be considered for DFAs.

* Protect wildlife routes and bird migration areas by supporting theprotection of Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodlands, Sand Movement corridors,and important wetlands like the Wild and Scenic Amargosa River, SaltCreek, and Bonanza Spring.

* Analyze how this plan impacts the National Park Service. Despite thesignificant acreage of our national parks in the plan area, the draftdoes not include discussion of how renewable energy projects willimpact their viewsheds, clear night skies, and wildlife-richneighboring lands.

Thank you for standing up for the California Desert!

Sincerely,

Page 574: FEB 20 2015 TN 74938

Mr. Bernabe Contreras60 Sierra Madre BlvdArcadia, CA 91006-1637