february 9 & 11th

34
February 9 & 11th

Upload: chun

Post on 14-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

February 9 & 11th. The seat of the soul and the control of voluntary movement - in fact, of nervous functions in general, - are to be sought in the heart. The brain is an organ of minor importance. Aristotle (from De motu animalium , 4th century B.C.). This is weird, but interesting!. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: February 9 & 11th

February 9 & 11th

Page 2: February 9 & 11th

The seat of the soul and

the control of voluntary movement - in fact, of nervous functions in general, - are to be

sought in the heart. The brain is an organ of minor importance.

Aristotle (from De motu animalium, 4th century B.C.)

Page 3: February 9 & 11th

This is weird, but interesting!

• fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too

Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt ! if you can raed tihs forwrad it

Page 4: February 9 & 11th

NBC Ch 3: Plastic brains, hybrid minds

• “Your own body is a phantom, one that your brain has temporarily constructed purely for convenience.”

• V.S. Ramachandran & S. Blakeslee

Page 5: February 9 & 11th

Visual mind games

• http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/mind/games.html#

• http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2003/lecture1.shtml

• http://psy.ucsd.edu/chip/ramaillusions.html

Page 6: February 9 & 11th

The Negotiable Body

• Experiment 1: The Extended Nose– “Your certain knowledge … constructed over a

lifetime [can be] negated by just a few seconds of the right kind of sensory stimulation.”

• Experiment 2: A pain in the … desktop?• Experiment 3: Sensation in a dummy hand.

Page 7: February 9 & 11th

The Extended Nose

• Two chairs in a line, one behind the other

• Person #1 sit in chair #1, blindfolded

• Person #2, site in front

• Person #3 stand beside #1

• Take right hand of #1 & index finger to #2’s nose. Move hand in a rhythmic manner so that index finger repeatedly strokes or taps #2’s nose in a random sequence like Morse code.

• At the same time, use your left hand to stroke #1’s nose with the same rhythm & timing.

• The stroking & tapping of #1 & #2’s noses should be in perfect synchrony.

#1#1

#2#2

#3#3

#3#3 Instructions for #3

Page 8: February 9 & 11th

A pain in the desktopDummy Hand

• Body-image supported by biological brain is quite plastic & highly & rapidly responsive to coordinated signals from environment.

• Image of physical body is a mental construct – open to continual renewal & reconfiguration.

• Bodies do change during our lifetimes.

Page 9: February 9 & 11th

Ramachandran’s Mirror Box – work with patients missing a

hand• Fool brain into thinking

missing limb was there.– Relieve pain from being

“clenched”• Despite probable presence

of some present genetic components in our body-images, there is also – and simultaneously – large scope for continual revision.

• Our brains depend on perceived correlations and a sense of our bodily bounds & locations - Ramachandran principle.

Page 10: February 9 & 11th

Ramachandran & Blakeslee

• “For your entire life, you’ve been walking around assuming that your “self” is anchored to a single body that remains stable and permanent at least until death … Yet these [results] suggest the exact opposite – that your body image, despite all its appearance of durability, is an entirely transitory internal construct that can be profoundly altered with just a few simple tricks.”

• Our brains seem to support highly negotiable body-images– Can readily project feeling & sensation beyond the

biological shell– New body image created that includes nonbiological

components

Page 11: February 9 & 11th

Phantom Limbs (Ramachandran )

Page 12: February 9 & 11th

Experience & Plasticity Occur in Biological Brains

• At birth brain has great structure & ability to build its own rules thru experience.– Most dramatic development of human brain

occurs during first 2 years from birth.

• Plasticity permits developing nervous system to adapt to its surrounding environment.– Capacity of brain to modify organization of its

neuron networks according to particular experiences of body.

Page 13: February 9 & 11th

Facts About Neuroplasticity

• FACT 1: Neuroplasticity includes several different processes that take place throughout a lifetime.– Neuroplasticity does not consist of a single type of

morphological change, but rather includes several different processes that occur throughout individual’s lifetime.

– Many types of brain cells are involved in neuroplasticity, including neurons, glia, & vascular cells.

• FACT 2: Neuroplasticity has a clear age-dependent determinant.– Although plasticity occurs over individual’s lifetime,

different types of plasticity dominate during certain periods of one’s life & are less prevalent during other periods.

Page 14: February 9 & 11th

Facts continued• FACT 3: Neuroplasticity occurs in brain under 2 primary conditions:

– During normal brain development when immature brain first begins to process sensory information through adulthood (developmental plasticity & plasticity of learning & memory).

– As adaptive mechanism to compensate for lost function and/or to maximize remaining functions in event of brain injury.

• FACT 4: The environment plays a key role in influencing plasticity.

– In addition to genetic factors, brain is shaped by characteristics of a person's environment & by actions of that same person.

• Consequence of neuroplasticity is that brain activity associated with a given function can move to a different location as a consequence of normal experience or brain damage/recovery. (Wikipedia)

Page 15: February 9 & 11th

Neural Opportunism• E.g., look at your room - What

info does biological brain actually bother to extract & process?

• Less than we might guess.• Human visual systems supports

only small are of high-resolution processing – fraction of visual field that falls into central focus (fovea).

• When inspect scene, brains move fovea around scene (in sequence of visual saccades; rate of 3/sec)– Humans presented with identical

pictures, but told to solve different kinds of problems show very different patterns of visual saccade.

Page 16: February 9 & 11th
Page 17: February 9 & 11th

Neural Opportunism

• Each saccade may be used to slowly build up detailed internal representation of salient aspects of scene….

• http://www.members.tripod.com/andybauch/magic.html

Page 18: February 9 & 11th
Page 19: February 9 & 11th
Page 20: February 9 & 11th
Page 21: February 9 & 11th

• Rely on our tendency to overestimate what we actually see in a single glance & on manipulation of our attention so as to actively inhibit extraction of crucial info at certain critical moments.

• Dennett’s card trick – at what point can you identify color of card.– Color sensitivity is available only in small,

central part of visual field.– My conscious experience – things look colored

all way out.

Card Tricks

Page 22: February 9 & 11th

Change Blindness

• Phenomenon where a person viewing a visual scene apparently fails to detect large changes in scene.

• For change blindness to occur, change in scene typically has to coincide with some visual, disruption such as a saccade (eye movement) or a brief obscuration of observed scene or image.

• When looking at still images, change blindness can be achieved by changing a part of image in 13 seconds or longer

• See movies

Page 23: February 9 & 11th

Change blindness for central objects can occur in real world

• Simons & Levin, 1998. • One experimenter approached pedestrian (subject) to ask for

directions. • During conversation, 2 other people rudely interrupted them

by carrying a door between experimenter & pedestrian. • During time that subject's view was obstructed, 1st

experimenter was replaced by a different experimenter. • Only 50 % of observers noticed change even though 2

experimenters wore different clothing, were different heights & builds, had different haircuts, & had noticeably different voices.

• Unless observers attend to & encode specific features that change, they will not detect difference. Simply attending to an object does not guarantee a complete representation of its features.

Page 24: February 9 & 11th

Stroop Effect

• //faculty.washington.edu/chudler/java/ready.html

• Words themselves have a strong influence over your ability to say the color.

• Interference between different information (what words say & color of the words) your brain receives causes a problem.

• Two theories that may explain Stroop effect:• Speed of Processing Theory: interference occurs because

words are read faster than colors are named. • Selective Attention Theory: interference occurs because

naming colors requires more attention than reading words

Page 25: February 9 & 11th

Kind of knowledge that counts

• May not be detailed knowledge of what’s out there • May be broad idea of what’s out there which informs on-the-

spot processes of info retrieval & use.• Visual brain may have hit upon a very potent problem-solving

strategy – preferring meta-knowledge over baseline knowledge.

• Meta-knowledge – knowledge about how to acquire & exploit information.

• Baseline knowledge – basic knowledge about the world.• Effect is often same – having super-rich, stable inner model of

scene allows you to answer certain questions rapidly & fluently, but so could knowing how to rapidly retrieve same info as soon as question is posed.

• E.g., say we know time just because we’re wearing a watch!

Page 26: February 9 & 11th

Doug Lenat & Cyc http://www.cyc.com/

• Cyc is an artificial intelligence project that attempts to assemble a comprehensive ontology and database of everyday common sense knowledge, with the goal of enabling AI applications to perform human-like reasoning.

• //video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7704388615049492068

Page 27: February 9 & 11th

Visual Brain is opportunistic

• Always ready to make do & to get most from what world already presents rather than building whole inner cognitive routines from neural cloth.

• “Letting world serve as its own best model” (Rodney Brooks, roboticist). – http://people.csail.mit.edu/brooks/– http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/humanoid-

robotics-group/cog/video.html– A good robot should use sensing frugally to

select & monitor just a few critical aspects of situation; rely on persistent physical surroundings to act as kind of enduring, external data-store.

Page 28: February 9 & 11th

World Brains• It just doesn’t matter

whether the data are stored somewhere inside the biological organism or stored in the external world.

• What matters is how info is poised for retrieval & for immediate use as & when required.

• Retrieval is some time hard.• Biological brain may not be

aware of what info is stored outside

Page 29: February 9 & 11th

What happens when opportunistic infant brains encounter world of

language?• Pan troglodyte chimpanzees• Thompson, Oden & Boysen • Trained chimps to associate plastic

token (e.g., red triangle) with any pair of identical objects (e.g., 2 shoes) & differently shaped toke with any pair of different objects (e.g., cup & shoe).

• Token trained chimps could solve more complex abstract problem – categorize pairs-of-pairs of objects in terms of higher-order sameness or difference.

• Shoe/shoe – banana/shoe different because relations within each pair are different.

Page 30: February 9 & 11th

• Chimps not trained could not learn how to solve problem.• How does token-training help chimps who had plastic

tokens & token-use training?• Researchers suggest that chimps’ brains come to associate

sameness judgments with inner image or trace of external token itself.– Now when see 2 items that are same activate inner

image of red plastic triangle.– Reduce tricky higher order problems to lower-order ones

defined not over world but over inner images of plastic tokens.

– www.indiana.edu/~cogdev/labwork/clark.doc • To generate effect, just need to associate lower-order

concepts (sameness & difference) with stable, perceptible items.

• Labeling is a cognitive shortcut!

Page 31: February 9 & 11th

It’s more than labeling• Cultural tool of public

language gives us labels and whole, structure, recursive systems for encoding, objectification, & communication of thoughts & ideas.

• Human brain is subjected to potent & empowering does of self-administered transformational medicine

• E.g., Joseph – deaf 11 year old who was never taught sign language & had no structured linguistic experiences in his childhood.

• “Joseph saw, distinguished, categorized, used; he had not

problems with perceptual categorization or

generalization, but he could not, it seemed, to much

beyond this, hold abstract ideas in mind, reflect, play, plan … he seemed, like an animal or an infant, to be stuck in the present, to be

confined to literal and immediate perception.”

• Oliver Sacks in Seeing Voices (1989)

Page 32: February 9 & 11th

Scaffolded Thinking

• How to profit from biological brain’s pattern-associating strengths while minimizing their weaknesses?

• One strategy – combine biological pattern-associating systems with various environmental props, aids & scaffoldings.– Pictures, spoken words, written words & diagrams &

digital media tools to get the most from our brains.

• We critique, rearrange, streamline & link with help of properties of external media which allow sequence of simple, pattern-associative reactions to become organized & to grow

• Brain acts as mediating factor.

Page 33: February 9 & 11th

Human thought is constrained in mental imagery

• In some very specific ways in which it is NOT constrained during online perception.

• Our mental images seem to be more interpretatively fixed & less able to reveal novel forms & components.

• Much harder to discover for first time the 2nd interpretation of ambiguous figures (duck/rabbit) in recall & imagination than when confronted with real drawing.

• People who couldn’t recall 2nd interpretation could draw what had seen 1st from memory & by perceptually inspecting their own memory-based drawing, find the 2nd interpretation.

Page 34: February 9 & 11th

Mind Tools

• Transform complex problems into ones that biological brain is better equipped to solve.– E.g., Martian artists vs. humans with external

props & media• Good, potentially transparent cognitive tools

“permit [users] to do tasks that need to be done while doing the kinds of things people are good at: recognizing patterns, modeling simple dynamics of the world, and manipulating objects in the environment.”