Şcoala Naţională de Studii Politice şi Administrative

Facultatea Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice

Departamentul Comunicare

FIŞA DE VERIFICARE

Conf. univ. dr. Loredana IVAN

Indicator Denumirea indicatorului Punctaj Elementul pentru care se acordă punctajul

I 1

Articole în reviste cotate

ISI cu factor de impact

f >/= 0.1

9 articole

Punctaj =

46.8

Ivan, L., Beu, D., & van Hoof, J. (2020). Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Overview of Public Policy and

Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5202 -5228 (Impact factor 2.84).

Punctaj (2 + 4 x 2.84) x 2/3= 8.9

Nimrod, G., & Ivan, L. (2019). The Dual Roles Technology Plays in Leisure: Insights from a Study of Grandmothers.

Leisure Sciences, 42, 1-18. (Impact factor 2.23). Punctaj (2 + 4 x 2.23) x 2/2= 10.92

Zbuchea, A., Ivan, L., Petropoulos, S., & Pinzaru, F. (2019). Knowledge sharing in NGOs: the importance of the human

dimension. Kybernetes, 49 (1), 182-199 (Impact factor 1.7). Punctaj (2 + 4 x 1.7) x 2/4= 4.4

Charles T Hill; Maria Rivas Barros; Klaus Boehnke; Diana Boer; Claudia C Brumbaugh; José Enrique Canto Y Rodriguez; Artemis

Giotsa; Rodrigo J Carcedo González; Loredana Ivan; Mei Kito; Karolina Kurys-Szyncel; Barbara Jankowiak; Zsuzsa Lasso;

Guillermo Macbeth; Eugenia Razumiejczyk; Sylvia Mari; Cláudio V Torres (2016). Basic Human Values, Well-Being, and Intimate

Relationships. (2016). International Journal of Psychology. 51: 1045. Factor de impact = 1.27Punctaj (2 + 4 x 1.27) x 2/19= 0.7

ter Mors, E., Terwel, B., Daamen, D., Reiner, D., Schumann, D., Anghel, S., Boulouta, I., Cismaru, D., Constantin, C., de Jager,

C.; Dudu, A., Esken, A.; Falup, O., Firth, R., Gemeni, V., Hendriks, C., Ivan, L., Koukouzas, N., Markos, A., Næss, R., Pietzner,

K., Samoila, I., Sava, C.; Stephenson, M., Tomescu, C., Torvatn, H., Tvedt, S., Valentin, D., West, J., Ziogou, F. (2013).

A comparison of techniques used to collect informed public opinions about CCS: opinion quality after focus group discussions

versus information-choice questionnaires. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 18, 256-263 (1750-5836).

Factor de impact 5.19. Punctaj Punctaj (2 + 4 x 5.19) x 2/30= 1.36

Ivan, Loredana (2012). ‘Religious in my own way”: Students religious relativism and self-actualizing values.

Review of research and social intervention, 36, 130-143 (1583-3410). Factor de impact 1.11 Punctaj (2 + 4 x 1.11) x 2/1= 12.88

Hill, C, Ivan, L., Gonzales, RC, Brumbaugh, C., Barros, M., Rodriquez, J, Kito, M., Macbeth, G., Razumieiczyk, E., Mari, S.

(2012). Similarities in correlates of relationship commitment across gender, sexual orientation, and cultures. Gender, International

Journal of Psychology, 47: sup1, 384-401 (0020-7594). Factor de impact 1.09

Punctaj (2+ 4 x 1.09) x 2/10 = 0.87

Ivan, Loredana & Duduciuc, Alina (2011). Social skills, nonverbal sensitivity and academic success. The key role of centrality in

student networks for higher grades achievement. Review of research and social intervention, 33, pp. 151-166 (1583-3410). Factor de

impact 1.11. Punctaj (2+ 4 x 1.11) x 2/2 = 6.44

Pietzner, K., Schumann, D., Tvedt, S., Torvatn, H., Naess, R., Reiner, Anghel, S., Cismaru, D., Constantin, C., Daamen, D., Dudu, A.,

Esken, A., Gemeni, V., Ivan, L., Koukouzas, N., Kristiansen, G., Markos, A., ter Mors, E., Nihfidov, OC, Papadimitriou, J.,Samoila, I,

Sava, C., Stephenson, M., Terwel, B, Tomescu, C., Ziogou, F. (2011). Public awareness and perceptions of CCS: insights for surveys

administered to representative samples in six European countries. Energy Procedia, 4, 6300-6306 (1876-6102). Factor de impact 0.8.

Punctaj (2+ 4 x 0.8) x 2/26 = 0.36

I 2

Articole în reviste cotate

ISI, cu factor de impact

f < 0.1 sau în reviste

indexate în cel puţin 2

bazele de date

internaţionale recunoscute

43

articole

Punctaj =

82

Ivan, Loredana, Loos, Eugène & Bird, Ioana. (2020). The impact of technology generations on older adults’ media use: Review of

previous empirical research and a seven country comparison. Gerontechnology, 19 (4).

https://journal.gerontechnology.org/currentIssue.aspx Punctaj (2 x 2)/ 3= 1.33

Marston, H. R., Ivan, L., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Rosales Climent, A., Gómez-León, M., Blanche-T, D., ... & Öztürk Çalikoglu, H.

(2020). COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness, and Leisure Activities: An International Study Protocol. Frontiers in

Sociology, 5, 89 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.574811P

Punctaj (2 x 2)/21= 0.1

Ivan, Loredana, Loos, Eugène, & Tudorie, George. (2020). Mitigating Visual Ageism in Digital Media: Designing for Dynamic

Diversity to Enhance Communication Rights for Senior Citizens. Societies, 10(4), 76, 1-13. Punctaj (2 x 2)/ 3= 1.33

Zbuchea, A., Ivan, L., Stan, S. O., & Dămăşaru, C. (2019). Mapping challenges of the Romanian NGOs. A focus on human

resources. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 9-27. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 4= 0.75

Loos, Eugène, Ivan, Loredana, & Leu, Don. (2018). “Save the Pacific Northwest tree octopus”: a hoax revisited.

Or: How vulnerable are school children to fake news? Information and Learning Science, 119(9/10), 514-528. .

Punctaj (2 x 2)/ 3= 1.33

Ivan, Loredana, & Schiau, Ioana. (2018). Older Audiences and Digital Media: Focus on Romania. Management

Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), 423-447 . Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 2= 1.5

Schiau, Ioana, Ivan, Loredana, & Bîră, Monica. (2018). Involving Older People in Participatory Action

Research: An Example of Participatory Action Design. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public

Relations, 20(1), 11-24. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 3= 1

Ivan, Loredana, Schiau, Ioana, & Buzoianu, Corina (2018). The use of a drawing tool to assess the implicit

ageism of students. Slovak Ethnology/Slovensky Narodopis, 66(2), 221-238. doi: 10.26363/SN.2018.2.04. Punctaj (2 x 2)/ 3= 1.3

Ștefăniță, Oana & Ivan, Loredana (2018). Characteristics of the Digital Divide in Romania and Differences in

Internet Use in Comparison with Internet Use in Europe. Journal of Media Research, 11(2), 5-21 Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/

2= 1.5

Ivan, L. (2017). Sex Role Identity, Communication Skills, and Group Popularity. Romanian Journal of

Communication and Public Relations, 19(2), 19-28. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 1= 3

Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older people and the use of ICTs to communicate with children and grandchildren. Transnational Social Review, 7(1), 41-55. Punctaj (2 x 2)/ 2= 2

Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older People, Mobile Communication and

Risks. Societies, 7(2), 7. doi:10.3390/soc7020007. Punctaj (2 x 2)/ 2= 2

Eugène Loos, Loredana Ivan, Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol, Maria Sourbati, Maria Ekström, Monika Wilinska, Simone Carlo and Ioana

Schiau (2017). Ageing well? A cross-country analysis of the way older people are visually represented at websites of organizations for

older people. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 8(2), 63-83.

Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 8= 0.5

Ivan, Loredana & Buzoianu-Daba, Corina (2016). Ageing and body image: Relation between self-esteem and body self-esteem at older

adults. Review of Interstud (Interdisciplinary Centre for Studies of Contemporary Discursive Forms), 19, 148-162.

Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 3= 1

Chelcea, Septimiu & Ivan, Loredana (2016). The “Aphrodite effect”: Labor market discrimination based on attractiveness. Psihologie

Sociala, 37, 37-55. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/3= 1

Cismaru, Diana-Maria & Ivan, Loredana (2016). Teachers’ perceptions on risk factors associated with dropout of high school students..

Psihologie Sociala, 37, 37-55. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/3= 1

Loredana Ivan, Shannon Hebblethwaite (2016). Grannies on the Net: Grandmothers’ Experiences of Facebook in Family

Communication. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 18 (1/37), 11-25. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 3= 1

Ivan, Loredana, Buzoianu-Daba, Corina & Duduciuc, Alina (2015). Media coverage of mobile phone base stations technology in

Romania. Review of Interstud (Interdisciplinary Centre for Studies of Contemporary Discursive Forms18, 167-180. (2065-3204)

Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 3= 1

Ivan, Loredana (2015). O analiză psihosociologică a termenului de ageism [A social psychological approach in analysing

ageism].Psihologie Sociala, 35, 66-69. (1454-5667) Punctaj (2 x 1)/ 1= 2

Zbuchea, Alexandra & Ivan, Loredana (2015). Painting shades of gray: How to communicate the history of communism in museums.

Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 17(2), 21-39. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 2= 1.5

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2014). The use of ICTS in students’ learning activities. Journal of Media Research, 7(1), 3-15,

(1844-8887). Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 2= 1.5

Duduciuc, Alina & Ivan, Loredana (2014). Brand naming: sound symbolism, brand preference and brand performance. Studies and

Scientific Research. Economics Edition, 20, 79-85 (2066-561X). Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 2= 1.5

Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia & Ivan, Loredana (2013): Older people and mobile communication in two European contexts, Romanian

Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 15(3), 83-98. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 2= 1.5

Ivan, Loredana (2013). Introspection on Romantic Relation Generates Attitudinal Change. Procedia -Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 78, 370-374 (1877-0428). Punctaj (2 x2)/1 = 4

Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia, Daba-Buzoianu, Corina & Ivan, Loredana ( 2013). Qualitative Research in Communication. Introductory

remarks. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations. 15(3), 9-10. Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 3= 1

Corbu, Nicoleta, Ivan, Loredana, Frunzaru, Valeriu & Pricopie, Remus (2013). Factors influencing school performance in Romania,

Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, Vol. LXV, nr. 1, 147-158 (2247-8558). Punctaj (2 x 1.5)/ 4= 0.75

Ivan, Loredana, (2012). Sex role identity, nonverbal sensitivity and potential leadership style Procedia - Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 46, 1720-1729 (1877-0428). Punctaj (2x 2)/1 =4

Ivan, Loredana, Pricopie, Remus, Frunzaru, Valeriu, Cismaru, Diana & Corbu, Nicoleta (2012). The risk of dropping

education for Romanian high-school students. Structural factors and educational policies. Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2312-2321(1877-0428). Punctaj (2x2)/5 = 0.8

Ivan, Loredana (2012). Using nonverbal sensitivity and cognitive style to discriminate between self and others' prosocial behavior.

Sfera Politicii, XX, 168(2), 100-111 (1221-6720) Punctaj 2 x1.5/1 =3

Ivan, Loredana (2011). The importance of popularity, rational thinking style and nonverbal sensitivity to achieve academic success.

Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 725-734 (2877-0428). Punctaj (2x2)/1=4

Ivan, Loredana (2011). Cognitive style and nonverbal sensitivity. Cognitive-experiential self theory validation.

Romanian Review of Communication and Public Relations, Vol. 13, 2(22), 31-49 (1454-8100). Punctaj 2 x1.5/1 =3

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana (2011). Atitudinea faţă de muncă în subcultura creativă. Calitatea vieţii, 1, 49-59)

. Punctaj (2x1)/2 =1

Ivan, Loredana & Cismaru, Diana M. (2010). Women’s voices in organizational life in Romania. Using interpersonal skills to lead.

Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 12 (1)

99-109 (1454-8100). Punctaj 2x1.5/2 = 1.5

Pricopie, Remus, Frunzaru, Valeriu, Corbu, Nicoleta & Ivan, Loredana (2010). Arguments for a new policy dialog on access and

equity in Romanian higher education. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 12 (2), 9-27 (1454-8100).

Punctaj (2x1.5)/4 = 0.75

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2010). Being in control by taking voluntary risk in contemporary society.

Sociologie Românească, 1, 80-87 (1220-5389). Punctaj (2x1.5)/2 = 1.5

Ivan, Loredana, Frunzaru, Valeriu şi Pricopie, Remus (2008). Decizia de a alege o facultate: raţionalitate sau condiţionare socială.

Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 14, 83-97. (1454-8100). Punctaj (2x1)/3 =0.6

Ivan, Loredana (2008). Rolul emoţiilor în cercetarea comportamentului prosocial. Merită să-i ajuţi pe alţii!

Sociologie Românească, 2, 81-100 (1220-5389). Punctaj (2x1)/1=2

Cismaru, Diana, Stănciugelu, Irina, Ivan, Loredana, Corbu, Nicoleta (2007). Comunicarea internă în organizaţiile şcolare din

România. Revista Română de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, 10, 221-230(1454-8100). Punctaj (2x1)/4 = 2

Cismaru, Diana M., Stănciugelu, Irina, Ivan, Loredana & Corbu, Nicoleta (2007). Comunicarea internă în

organizaţiile şcolare româneşti. Reflecţii pe marginea unei anchete sociologice. Revista de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, 10, 221-

231(1454-8100). Punctaj (2x1)/4 =0.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana. (2007). Politica ocupării forţei de muncă în Uniunea Europeană. Egalitatea între bărbaţi şi femei

în România. Revista de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, 9, 159-175 (1454-8100). Punctaj (2x1)/2=1

Funieru, Cristian, Ţandără, Adrian, Cuculescu, Marian, Ranga, Roxana, Comeş, Cristian, Panaitescu, Eugenia & Ivan, Loredana

(2006). Statistical correlations concerning dental and periodontal status and the level of education in oral health in pupils of Bucharest

schools. OHDMBSC, 5(3), 11-17. (2247-2452)Punctaj (2x1.5)/7=0.4

Chelcea, Septimiu, Jderu, Gabriel, Ivan, Loredana & Moldoveanu, Andreea (2006). Frauda intelectuală în universităţi. Revista de

Sociologie, Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” Sibiu, 1, 7-37 (1584-0050). Punctaj (2x1)/4 = 0.5

Chelcea, Septimiu & Ivan, Loredana (2001). Metodologia şi practica sondajelor finale (exit polls) cu referire la alegerile de la 26

noiembrie 2000 din România. Revista de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, 4-5, 51-67. (1454-8100). Punctaj 2x1/4= 0.5

I 3 Cărţi publicate ca unic

autor Punctaj

10

Ivan, Loredana (2009). Cele mai importante 20 de secunde. Competenţa în comunicarea nonverbală. Bucureşti: Editura Tritonic,

298 p. (978-973-733-345-2). Punctaj =10

I 4

Cărţi publicate în calitate

de co-autor, având n

coautori (n=/< 3)

Punctaj

13

Duduciuc, Alina, Ivan, Loredana & Chelcea, Septimiu (2013). Psihologia socială. Studiul interacţiunilor umane. Bucureşti:

Comunicare.ro, 340 p. (978-973-711-455-6). Punctaj (6x1)/3 = 2

Chelcea, Septimiu, Ivan, Loredana & Chelcea, Adina. (2008). Comunicarea nonverbală: gesturile şi postura

(ediţia a II-a revăzută şi îmbunătăţită). Bucureşti: Editura Comunicare.ro, 299 p. (978-973-711-160-9). Punctaj: (6 x 1)/3 = 2

Chelcea, Septimiu, Ivan, Loredana & Chelcea, Adina. (2005). Comunicarea nonverbală: gesturile şi postura (ediţia I).

(973-711—014-5) Bucuresti. Editura Comunicare.ro, 234 p. Punctaj (6 x 1) /3 = 2

Ivan, Loredana, Daba-Buzoianu, Corina & Gray, Brenden (2014) Maping Heterogenity: Qualitative Research in Communication.

Bucharest: Tritonic, 623p (ISBN 978-606-8571-51-5). Punctaj (6 x 1)/3 = 2

Ivan, Loredana, Iorga, Elena Madalina & Stanescu, Dan Florin (2014). Competenţă emoţională şi evaluare interpersonală. Bucuresti:

Tritonic, 243p. ( 978-606-8571-40-9). ). Punctaj (6 x 1)/3 = 2

Ivan, Loredana & Duduciuc, Alina (2011). Comunicare nonverbală şi construcţia socială. Bucureşti:

Editura Tritonic, 384 p. (978 -606 -8320-22-9). Punctaj (6x 1)/2 =3

I 5

Cărţi coordonate, având n

coordonatori (n=/< 3)

Punctaj

6,6

Duduciuc, Alin, Ivan, Loredana & Stănescu, Dan, Florin (Eds.) (2016). Comunicare și percepție socială. București: Editura

Comunicare.ro, 193 p. (ISBN, 978-973-711-552-2) Punctaj 5x1./3 = 1.6

Yeomans, Liz, Daba-Buzoianu, Corina & Ivan, Loredana (Eds.) (2015). Romanian Journa of Communication and Public Relations,

17, 3(36). ISSN: 1454-8100

Punctaj 5x1.5/3 = 2.5

Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia, Daba-Buzoianu, Corina & Ivan, Loredana (Eds.) (2013). Qualitative Research in Communication.

Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations. 15(3). Punctaj (5 x 1.5)/3 = 2.5

I 6 Studii/capitole, având n

autori, în volume colective

Punctaj

83 Ivan, Loredana & Mocanu, Florinela (2020). Older People and Technology use: The Importance of Using Video Stimuli in Group

(volume cu ISBN)

Discussions. In Qin Gao & Jia Zhou Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technologies, Design and User Experience

(pp.147-163). Springer Punctaj: 2x2/2 = 2

Ivan, Loredana (2020). The Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Family Communication: Dialogues with

Grandmothers from Romania. In Gramshammer-Hohl, Dagmar & Hergenroether, Oana (Eds.). Foreign Countries of Old Age: East

and Southeast European Perspectives on Aging. Buch, Viena: https://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-4554-5/foreign-countries-

of-old-age/ Punctaj: 2x2/1 = 4

Ivan Loredana (2019). Using Netnography to Research Older Adults’ Online Communities: Designing and Evaluating Emerging

Technologies for Older Adults. În Barbara Barbosa Neves Frank Vetere (Eds.) Ageing and Digital Technology (pp.133-150).

Singapore: Springer Nature. Punctaj: 2x2/1 = 4

Ivan, Loredana (2019). Partner similarities in Romania. În Charles T. Hill: Intimate Realtions Across Cultures. A

Comparative Study (pp. 65-68). New York: Cambridge University Press. Punctaj: 2x2/1 = 4

Zbuchea, Alexandra. & Ivan, Loredana. (2018). Why Volunteer? A Perspective from Young Adult Romanians. In Corina Daba-

Buzoianu, Monica Bîră, Alina Duduciuc, & George Tudorie: Exploring Communication through Qualitative Research (pp.367-387).

Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Punctaj: 2x2/4 = 1 punct.

Loos, Eugène & Ivan, Loredana (2018). Visual Ageism in the Media. In Liat Ayalon & Clemens Tesch-Römer: Contemporary

perspectives on ageism (pp. 163-176). New York: Springer Cham. Punctaj: 2x2/2 = 2 puncte.

Ivan, Loredana (2017) Raționalitate și decizie rațională în psihologia socială: rolul euristicilor. În

Roșca, Catălina și Vlăducu, Andrei: Teorii ale deciziei. Perspective psiho-economice (pp. 18-52). București: Editura Universitară.

ISBN: 978-606-28-0593-7. Punctaj: 2x1/1 = 2 puncte.

Ivan, Loredana (2017) Gender Differences in Investing and Savings Behaviour: The Nesting Effect. In Alexandra Zbuchea, Brătianu,

Constantin & Florina Pînzaru: Economic Behavior: Economy, Business and People (pp. 201-219) Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars

(ISBN: 978-1-4438-5191-6) Punctaj: 2x2/1 = 4

Ivan, Loredana & Schiau, Ioana (2016). Experiencing Computer Anxiety Later in Life: The Role of Stereotype Threat. În J. Zhou & G.

Salvendy: Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging (pp.339-349). Berlin: Springer (978-3-319-39942-3).

Punctaj (2x2)/2 =2

Ivan, Loredana (2016). Adoptarea noilor tehnologii la vârstnici. Factori explicativi. În Alina Duduciuc, Loredana Ivan & Dan Stănescu

(Eds.). Comunicare și percepție socială (pp.9-27). București: Comunicare.ro (978-973-711-552-2). Punctaj (2x1)/1 =2

Ivan, Loredana, Dumitriu, Diana L., & Săvulescu, Rodica (2016). Older people in digital creation contexts: building a participatory

action research design. În Alexandra Zbuchea &Dimitrios Nicolaidis (Eds). Responsible Entrepreneurship, Vision, Development and

Ethics (pp. 52-64). București: Comunicare.ro (978-973-711-551-5). Punctaj (2x.1.5)/3 =1

Fernández-Ardèvol, Mireia & Ivan, Loredana. (2015). Why age is not that important? An aging perspective on computer anxiety. In Z.

Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging (pp. 189-200). Berlin: Springer.

http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-20913-5

ISBN: 10.1007-978-3-319-20913-5 Punctaj (2x2)/2 =2

Ivan, Loredana (2015). Percepţia luxului: o perspectivă psiho-sociologică. În Marian Petcu (Ed.). Sociologia Luxului. Bucuresti:

Tritonic, pp 85-125. ISBN: 978-606-749-039-8 Punctaj (2x1)/1 =2

Ivan, Loredana (2014). Practica de relatii publice in muzeele din Romania (2014). În Alexandra Zbuchea: Practica relatiilor publice

in muzee (pp. 104-123). Bucuresti: Editura Comunicare.ro (ISBN 978-973-711-277-4) Punctaj (2x1)/1 =2

Ivan, Loredana, Iorga, Elena Madalina & Stanescu, Dan Florin (2014). Studiu eplorativ privind anxietatea şi afectivitatea la studenţii

tradiţionali şi non-tradiţionali. În Ivan, Loredana, Iorga, Elena Madalina şi Stanescu, Dan Florin (coord.) Competenţă emoţională şi

evaluare interpersonală (pp. 17-33). Bucuresti: Tritonic. ( 978-606-8571-40-9). Punctaj (2x1)/3 =0.66

Ivan, Loredana & Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia (2014). Elders and the use of mobile phone in Romania: Results of semi-structured

interviews. In Ivan, Loredana, Daba-Buzoianu, Corina and Gray, Brenden (Eds). Maping Heterogenity: Qualitative Research in

Communication (pp. 207-221). Bucharest: Tritonic. (ISBN 978-606-8571-51-5). Punctaj (2x.1.5)/2 =1.5

Ivan, L. (2014). Nonverbal Sensitivity and Network Centrality: Using our Abilities to Interpret Emotions and Become Popular. In N.

Corbu, D. Popescu-Jourdy & T. Vlad. (Eds). Identity and Intercultural Communication. (pp. 595-615). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar

Publishing (978-1443863971). Punctaj (2x2)/1 =4

Ivan, Loredana, Stănescu, Dan F. & Iorga, Elena Mădălina (2014). A comparative study regarding anxiety and negative and positive

emotions. In Maria Francesca Freda (Eds.). Reflexivity in higher education. Research and models of intervention for underachievement

students (pp.261-269). Rome: ARACNE. (978-88-548-7014-7). Punctaj (2x2)/3 =1.33

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana. (2014). Students’ ICT use and their expectations on teachers’ computer-based communication and

employer’s demands. In Diana Maria Cismaru and Cristina Leovaridis. Innovation and Organizational Learning (pp. 229-246).

Bucharest: Tritonic (ISBN 978-606-8571-48-5). Punctaj (2x1.5)/2 =1.5

Ivan, Loredana (2013). Importanta textelor care insotesc exponatele. Cercetare cantitativa derulata in Brasov si Timisoara. In

Alexandru, Amalia, Ivan, Loredana, Murgoci, Mihaela si Zbuchea, Alexandra Texte de muzeu: între comunicareşi educaţie. ( pp. 81-

108). Bucuresti, Colias international. (ISBN 978-973-0-15686-7). Punctaj (2x1)/1 =2

Frunzaru, Valeriu (coord.), Pricopie, Remus, Corbu, Nicoleta, Ivan, Loredana & Cismaru, Diana-Maria (2013). Învăţământul

universitar din Romania. Dialog cu elevi, studenţi şi profesori. Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro, 196 p. (978-973-711-456-3). Contribuţii în 2

capitole. Punctaj (2x1)/1 + (2x1)/1 =4

Ivan, Loredana (2013). “Nesting instinct”: antreprenoriatul feminin, între investiţii şi comportament de economisire. În D.M. Cismaru

(coord.) Antreprenoriatul şi performanţa în afaceri. Lecţii învăţate în proiectul E.H.R.- Antreprenoriatul pentru resurse umane

(pp.126-139). Bucureşti: Editura Comunicare.ro (978-973-711-482-2). Punctaj (2x1)/1 =2

Ivan, Loredana, Cicei, Cătălina C. & Stănescu, Dan F. (2013). Examining emotional intelligence and nonverbal sensitivity using

MSCEIT and PONS. În Runcan, Patricia Luciana, Raţă, Georgeta & Gavriliuc, Alin (Eds.). Applied Social Sciences: Psychology,

Physical Education and Social Medicine (pp.297-305). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars (1-4438-4524-8). Punctaj (2x2)/3 =1.33

Ivan, Loredana (2013). A. Nonverbal sensitivity. Evidence for different accuracy on face and voice channel using static or dynamic

items. În Freitas-Magalhães: Emotional Expression: The Brain and The Face, vol. 4 (pp.175-197). Porto: Universitatea Fernando

Pessoa (978-989-643-117-4). Punctaj (2x2)/1 =4

Ivan, Loredana (2013). ‘Felling small’ or ‘Feeling awkward’: Two types of shame. In M. Mosche & N. Corbu (Eds.). The Walk

of Shame (pp.173-190). New York: Nova Publishers (978-1-62618-164-169) Punctaj (2x2)/1 =4

Ivan, Loredana (2013). Sex role identity, communication skills, and group popularity. În M. Boţan, T. Vlad şi D. Popescu Jourdy.

Proceedings on the International Conference on Media and the Public Sphere. Rethinking the Public Sphere: Theoretical

Conceptualization, New Challenges, and Dynamic (pp. 512-530). Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro (978-973-711-461-7). Punctaj (2x1.5)/1 =3

Pricopie, Remus, Frunzaru, Valeriu, Corbu, Nicoleta, Ivan, Loredana & Bârgăoanu, Alina (2011). Acces şi echitate în învăţământul

superior din România. Dialog cu elevii şi studenţii. Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro (978-973-711-299-6). Contributii in 4 capitole. Punctaj

= [ (2 x 1)/5] x4 = 1.6

Ivan, Loredana, Stănescu, Dan F., & Iorga, Mădalina (2011). Testing nonverbal sensitivity with DANVA and PONS. Evidence for

different accuracy on face and voice channels. În Marius Milcu, Ute Schmidt-Brasse, Marilena Milcu & Cristina Grabovschi (Eds.).

Prospecting advanced research in health, education and social studies (pp.44-51).Bucureşti: Editura Universitară (978-606-591-239-7)

(2x1.5)/3 = 1

Ivan, Loredana (2010). Atracţia interpersonală: afilierea, iubirea şi gelozia (Cap.13) şi Stereotipuri, prejudecăţi şi discriminare socială

(Cap. 18). În S. Chelcea (coord.): Psihosociologie: teorie, cercetări şi aplicaţii (pp. 245-269 şi pp. 337-355). Iaşi: Editura Polirom,

ediţia a III-a revăzută şi îmbunătăţită (978-973-46-1653-4). Contribuţii in

2 capitole Punctaj = 2x1/1 + 2x1/1 =4

Zbuchea, Alexandra (coord.) Ivan, Loredana, Neamu-Bem, Raluca & Mastan, Bruno (2009). Teatrul muzeal: perspective şi

exeperienţe. Bucureşti: Editura Tritonic, 109 p. (978-973-733-384-1). Contributii in 2 capitole Punctaj =2 x 1/1+ 2 x1/1 = 4

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2009). La culture médiatique et la promotion the risque volontaire dans la société contemporaine.

În Odile Riondet & Ioan Drăgan (Eds.): Communautés Fontière, Media (pp.195-207). Bucureşti şi Lyon: Editura Universităţii din

Bucureşti (2068-5750). Punctaj (2 x1.5)/2 = 1.5

Frunzaru,Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana. (2009). Tango lessons in Bucharest. A local community in a global world. În P. Dobrescu, R.

Pricopie & M. A. Ionescu (eds.): R&D Perspectives. Promoting Innovation through Education, Culture and Communication (pp.119-

126). Bucureşti: Editura Comunicare.ro (978-973-711-220-0). Punctaj (2 x1.5)/2 = 1.5

Dobrescu, Paul (coord.), Ivan, Loredana, Frunzaru, Valeriu, Cismaru, Diana-Maria, Zbuchea, Alexandra, Ciocea, Mălina, Cârlan,

Alexandru, Tudorie, George & Crişan, Camelia (2008).Cultural creatives. Cercetări privind evoluţia valorilor în societatea

românească. Bucureşti: Editura Comunicare.ro. Contributii in 3 capitole (două capitole -autor unic) 277 p. (978-973-711-181-4).

Punctaj = 2x 1/2 + 2x 1/1 +2x 1/1 = 1+2+2 =5

Chelcea, Septimiu, Ivan, Loredana, Jderu, Gabriel, Kalambayi, Fidelie, Mălureanu, Radu & Zodieru, Alexandru

(2008). Anchetă sociologică: frauda intelectuală, ruşinea şi vinovăţia în universităţi În S. Chelcea: Sociologie emoţiilor. Ruşinea şi

vinovăţia în spaţiul public (pp.216-240). Bucureşti: Editura Humanitas (978-973-50-2403-4). Punctaj = 2x1/6 = 0.32

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2008).The self-actualizing and the environment protection’ values. În A.

Bârgăoanu & R. Pricopie (Eds.): Education, Research and Innovation. Policies and Strategies in the Age of Globalization

(pp.81-89). Bucureşti: Editura Comunicare.ro (978-973-711-161-6). Punctaj = 2 x1.5/2 = 1.5

Frunzaru,Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana (2008). Social inclusion and cultural creatives. Romania as a new EU member state. În A.

Bârgăoanu & R. Pricopie (Eds.): Education, Research and Innovation. Policies and Strategies in the Age of Globalization (pp. 417-

423). Bucureşti: Editura Comunicare.ro.(978-973-711-161-6). Punctaj = 2 x1.5/2 = 1.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana. (2007). EU gender employment policies. Romania as a new member state. În P. Dobrescu, A.

Ţăranu şi A. Bârgăoanu (eds.): Globalization and Policies of Development Bucureşti: Editura SNSPA, p. 373 (978-973-711-125-8).

Punctaj = 2 x1.5/2 = 1.5

Septimiu Chelcea, Loredana Ivan, Gabriel Jderu & Andreea Moldoveanu (2006). Psihosociologie: teorie si aplicatii. Bucuresti: Editura

Economica, 317 p. (973-709-210-4) (2 capitole). Punctaj = 2x1/1 + 2x1/1 =4

Chelcea, Septimiu, Jderu, Gabriel & Ivan, Loredana. (2005). Efectul de regrupare în jurul învingătorului din sondajele electorale

versus efectul susţinerii celui învins în sondaje. Studiu experimental. În S.Chelcea şi G. Jderu (coord.): Refracţia sociologică şi

reflecţia jurnalistică. Despre sondajele de opinie şi prezentarea lor în mass media (pp. 141-161). Bucureşti: Editura Economică

(973-709-171-X). Punctaj = 2 x1/3 = 0.66

Chelcea, Septimiu, Ivan, Loredana, Duduciuc, Alina & Moldoveanu, Andreea (2004). Atractivitatea feţei feminine. În S. Chelcea

(coord.): Comunicarea nonverbală în spaţiul public. Studii, cercetări, aplicaţii (pp. 95-119). Bucureşti: Editura Tritonic. (973-8497-

85-X). Punctaj = 2 x1/4 = 0.5

I 7

Recenzii publicate în

reviste cotate ISI sau în

reviste indexate în cel

puțin trei baze de date

internaționale

recunoscute; sau termeni

de minimum o pagina în

dicționarele de specialitate

Punctaj

13.5

Ivan, Loredana (2019.) Religion and Brazilian Democracy. Mobilizing the People of God by Amy Erica Smith (book review).

Psihologie Sociala, 43, 141-142. Punctaj 0.5 x1/1 = 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2015). Septimiu Chelcea, Psihosociologia opinei publice. Psihologie Sociala, 36, 135-139. Punctaj 0.5 x1/1 = 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2014). Dicţionar Enciclopedic de Comunicare şi Termeni Asociaţi (DEC) (Encyclopedia of Communication).

Editor Marian Petcu. Bucharest: C.H. Beck. (978-606-18-0362-0). Punctaj [ (0.5x1)/1]x 13 termeni = 6.5

13 termeni elaboraţi în acest dicţionar: Analiza retelelor sociale pp. 15-17; Atitudine pp. 35-37; Cercetare pp. 78-80; Cercetare descriptiva pp. 81-83;

Chestionar pp. 84-86; Cercetare explicativa pp. 74-76; Competenta in comunicarea nonverbala/competenta nonverbala pp. 98-99;

Comunicare interpersonala pp. 110-111; Comunicare nonverbala pp. 111-113; Inteligenta emotionala pp. 257-260; Influenta sociala

pp. 253-255; Managementul impresiei pp. 295-299; Populatie statistica p. 360

Ivan, Loredana (2008). Vincent N. Parrilo, “Diversity in America”, recenzie în Sociologie Românească, 1,

119-122 (1220-5389). Punctaj 0.5 x1/1 = 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2004). A VI-a Conferinţă a Asociaţiei Europene de Sociologie: Ageing Societies, New Sociology, Murcia (Spania), 23-

26 septembrie, 2003. Sociologie Românească, 1 (12220-5389). Punctaj 0.5 x1/1 = 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2001). Sociologia Nordică. Sociologie Românească 2001, 1/4, pp. 375-393. (1220-5389). Punctaj 0.5 x1/1 = 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2001). Septimiu Chelcea. „Sociologia opiniei publice”, recenzie în Sociologie Românească, 2001, 1/4. (1220-5389).

Punctaj 0.5 x1/1 = 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2003). Comunicare (pp.88-90), Comunicare nonverbală (pp.93-94), Comunicare verbală (pp.94-95), Managementul

impresiei (218-219), Percepţia personei (pp.249-250), Percepţia politică (p.251), Percepţia publică (pp.251-252). În S. Chelcea & P.

Iluţ (coord.): Enciclopedie de psihosociologie. Bucureşti: Editura Economică (973-590-834-4). Punctaj [ (0.5x1)/1]x 6 termeni =3

Iluţ, Petru &Ivan, Loredana (2003). Compararea socială (pp.78-81), Prototip (pp.272-273). În S. Chelcea & P. Iluţ (coord.):

Enciclopedie de psihosociologie. Bucureşti:Editura Economică (973-590-834-4). Punctaj 0.5x1/2+ 0.5x1/2 = 0.5

Chelcea, Septimiu & Ivan, Loredana (2003). Gelozie (pp.154-155). În S. Chelcea & P. Iluţ (coord.).Enciclopedie de psihosociologie.

Bucureşti: Editura Economică, 2003 (973-590-834-4). Punctaj =0.5x1/2 =0,25

Postelnicu, Camil & Ivan, Loredana (2003). Atracţia interpersonală (pp.49-52). În S. Chelcea & P. luţ (coord.) Enciclopedie de

psihosociologie. Bucureşti: Editura Economică (973-590-834-4). Punctaj = 05x1/2 =0,25

I 8

Lucrări publicate în

volumele unor conferinte

(volume cu ISSN) sau

indexate în cel puţin una

dintre bazele de date

internaţionale recunoscute

Punctaj

6.16

Cismaru, Diana M. & Ivan, Loredana (2013). Risk factors associated with dropout of high school students in Romania. ICERI

2013 Proceedings (pp. 4189-4195). The 6th Conference on Education, Research and Innovation, organizată de IATED,

18-20 noiembrie, Seville, Spania (978-84-616-3847-5) Punctaj (1x2)/2 =1

Ivan, Loredana (2011). Using students’ centrality and prestige in their formal groups and nonverbal sensitivity measures to predict

academic success. În L. Gomez Chova, I Candel Torres şi A. Lopez Martinez (Eds.): INTED 2011 Proceedings CD, pp. 5068-5077

(978-84-614-7423-3). 5th International Technology, Education and Development Conference 7-9 martie 2011, Valencia, Spania.

Punctaj (1x2)/1 =2

Ivan, Loredana, Frunzaru Valeriu, Pricopie Remus & Corbu Nicoleta (2011). The risk of dropping school versus enrrolling university

for the Romanian high school pupils. Insides for national educational policies. În L. Gomez Chova, I Candel Torres & A. Lopez

Martinez (Eds.): INTED 2011 Proceedings CD pp. 5040-5048 (978-84-614-7423-3). 5th International Technology, Education and

Development Conference 7-9 martie 2011, Valencia, Spania. Punctaj (1x2)/4 =0.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu, Pricopie, Remus & Ivan, Loredana. (2009). Family and school performance. How family affects students’

intention to continue their studies. International Congress on Family, School and Society – Special Education (Proceedings the

International Conference – CD (978-09-155-525-80) Universitatea Fernando Pessoa, Porto, 8-13 iulie. Punctaj (1x2)/3=0.66

Ivan, Loredana (2008). Using thin slices paradigm to explain people’s accuracy in predicting others’ social-value orientation

in an interdependency situation. În Suat Guezin (Ed). CIM (Communication in the Millennium) The 6th International Symposium

‘Communication in The Millenium’, pp.811-825, 14-16 mai 2008, Istanbul, Turcia.Punctaj (1x 2)/ 1=2

I 9

Citari ISI, în cărţi sau

volume ori reviste

indexate în baze de date

internaţionale

Punctaj=

160

Citări ale articolului Ivan, L., Beu, D., & van Hoof, J. (2020). Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Overview of

Public Policy and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5202 -5228 (Impact

factor 2.84).

Ibănescu, B. C., Bănică, A., Eva, M., & Cehan, A. (2020). The Puzzling Concept of Smart City in Central and Eastern

Europe: A Literature Review Designed for Policy Development. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16(61),

70-87. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x1)x2/3 = Punctaj = 2.8

Citări ale articolului

Nimrod, G., & Ivan, L. (2019). The Dual Roles Technology Plays in Leisure: Insights from a Study of Grandmothers.

Leisure Sciences, 42, 1-18. (Impact factor 2.23).

Zeng, S., Cuskelly, G., & Luo, Q. (2020). Exploring the Efficiency of Digital Running Devices on Habitual Running: A Mixed

Methods Study. Leisure Sciences, 1-21. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x2.23)x2/2 = Punctaj = 9.12

Citări ale articolului: Zbuchea, A., Ivan, L., Stan, S. O., & Dămăşaru, C. (2019). Mapping challenges of the Romanian

NGOs. A focus on human resources. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 9-27

Navajas-Romero, V., Caridad y López del Río, L., & Ceular-Villamandos, N. (2020). Analysis of Wellbeing in Nongovernmental

Organizations’ Workplace in a Developed Area Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16),

5818. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x2.84)x2/4 = Punctaj = 5.78

Citari ale capitolului: Eugène Loos, Loredana Ivan, Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol, Maria Sourbati, Maria Ekström, Monika

Wilinska, Simone Carlo and Ioana Schiau (2017). Ageing well? A cross-country analysis of the way older people are visually

represented at websites of organizations for older people. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology,

8(2). ISSN 2068 – 0317.

Dovie, D. (2018). Leveraging Healthcare Opportunities for Improved Access among Ghanaian Retirees:

The Case of Active Aging. Social Sciences, 7(6), 92. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x1)x2/8 = 1

Loos, E. (2018). The organizational use of online stock photos: the impact of representing senior citizens as

eternally youthful. Human Technology, 14(3). Punctaj = 0.2

Citări ale capitolului: Loos, Eugène & Ivan, Loredana (2018). Visual Ageism in the Media. In Liat Ayalon & Clemens Tesch-

Römer: Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 163-176). New York: Springer Cham.

(ISBN 978-3-319-73819-2)

Ayalon, L., & Tesch-Römer, C. (2018). Introduction to the Section: On the Manifestations and Consequences

of Ageism. In Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 109-114). Springer, Cham. Punctaj = 0.2

Mendonça, J., Marques, S., & Abrams, D. (2018). Children’s attitudes toward older people:

Current and future directions. In Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 517-548). Springer, Cham.

Punctaj = 0.2

Amaral, I., & Daniel, F. (2018, July). The Use of Social Media Among Senior Citizens in Portugal:

Active AgeingThrough an Intergeneration Approach. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT

for the Aged Population (pp. 422-434). Springer, Cham. Punctaj = 0.2

Loos, E. (2018). The organizational use of online stock photos: the impact of representing senior citizens as

eternally youthful. Human Technology, 14(3), 336-381. Punctaj = 0.2

Berthelot-Guiet, K. (2018, July). New Media, New Commodification, New Consumption for Older People.

In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (pp. 435-445). Springer, Cham.

Punctaj = 0.2

Citari ale capitolului: Fernández-Ardèvol, M. & Ivan, L. (2015). Why age is not that important? An aging perspective on

computer anxiety.In Z. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging (pp. 189-

200). Berlin: Springer.

dos Santos, T. D., & Santana, V. F. D. (2018, April). Computer Anxiety and Interaction: A Systematic Review.

In Proceedings of the Internet of Accessible Things (p. 18). ACM. Punctaj = 0.2

Loos, E., Ivan, L., & Leu, D. (2018). “Save the Pacific Northwest tree octopus”: a hoax revisited. Or: How vulnerable are school children to fake news?. Information and Learning Science, 119(9/10), 514-528.

Punctaj = 0.2

Citări ale articolului: Ivan, L., & Hebblethwaite, S. (2016). Grannies on the net: Grandmothers’ experiences of Facebook in family communication. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 18(1), 11-25.

Juul, A., Wilding, R., & Baldassar, L. (2019). The best day of the week: New technology enhancing quality of life in a care

home. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(6), 1000. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x2.84)x2/2 =

Punctaj = 11.56

Elias, N., Nimrod, G., & Lemish, D. (2019). The ultimate treat? Young Israeli children’s media use under their

grandparents’ care. Journal of Children and Media, 13(4), 472-483. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x1.24)x2/2 =5.16

Colombo, F., Aroldi, P., & Carlo, S. (2018). " I use it correctly!": the use of ICTs among Italian grandmothers

in a generational perspective. Human Technology, 14(3). Punctaj = 0.2

Genoe, R., Kulczycki, C., Marston, H., Freeman, S., Musselwhite, C., & Rutherford, H. (2018). E-Leisure and Older Adults: Findings from an International Exploratory Study. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 52(1), 1-18.

Punctaj = 0.2

Hebblethwaite, S. (2018). The evolution of therapeutic recreation in a digital world. Therapeutic Recreation Journal,

52(1). Punctaj = 0.2

Carlo, S., & Rebelo, C. (2018, July). Technology: a bridge or a wall? The inter (intra) generational use of ICTs among Italian grandmothers. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population

(pp. 446-464). Springer, Cham. Punctaj = 0.2

Sharaievska, I., & Burk, B. (2018). Recreation in Families with Children with Developmental Disabilities:

Caregivers’ Use of Online and Offline Support Groups. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 52(1). Punctaj = 0.2

Hebblethwaite, S. (2018) Opportunities and Challenges for Therapeutic Recreation in a Digital World.

Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 52(2). Punctaj = 0.2

Ratzenböck, B. (2017, July). Everyday life interactions of women 60+ with ICTs: creations of meaning and negotiations of identity. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (pp. 25-37). Springer, Cham.

Impact factor =0; Punctaj =0.2x2/24 =0.01

Ayer, N. (2017). Online Leisure Communities: The Case of Tennis Enthusiasts. PhD thesis UWSpace. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/12540

Impact factor = 1.55; Punctaj =(0.2+4x1.55) x2 =12.8

Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older People, Mobile Communication and Risks. Societies, 7(2),7.

Impact factor =0; Punctaj =0.2x2/24 =0.01

Hebblethwaite, S. (2017). The (In) Visibility of Grandparents in Family Leisure Research: A Call for Expanded Conceptualizations of “Family”. Leisure Sciences, 39(5), 415-425. Impact factor = 1,13

Fernández-Ardèvol, Mireia, Kim Sawchuk, and Line Grenier. "Maintaining Connections." Nordicom Review 38, no. s1 (2017): 39-51.

Impact factor =0; Punctaj =0.2x2/24 =0.01

Citări ale articolului:Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older people and the use of ICTs to

communicate with children and grandchildren. Transnational Social Review, 7(1), 41-55.

Döring, N. (2018). Sozialkontakte online: Identitäten, Beziehungen, Gemeinschaften. Handbuch Online-Kommunikation,

1-28. Punctaj = 0.2

Tezcan, T. (2018). On the move in search of health and care: Circular migration and family conflict amongst older

Turkish immigrants in Germany. Journal of Aging Studies, 46, 82-92.Punctaj = (0.2 +4x1.2)x2/2 = 5

Ducu, V. (2018). “Staying in Touch”: Views from Abroad and from Home. In Romanian Transnational Families

(pp. 41-58). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Punctaj = 0.2

Kadylak, T., Makki, T. W., Francis, J., Cotten, S. R., Rikard, R. V., & Sah, Y. J. (2018).Disrupted copresence: Older adults’ views on mobile phone use during face-to-face interactions. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(3), 331-349.

Punctaj = (0.2 +4x1.5)x2/2 = 6.2

Roos, V., & Robertson, C. (2018). Young adults’ experiences regarding mobile phone use in relation to older persons: Implications for care. Qualitative Social Work, 1473325018787857.

Punctaj = (0.2 +4x1)x2/2 = 4.2

Nedelcu, M. (2017). Transnational grandparenting in the digital age: mediated co-presence and childcare in the case of Romanian migrants in Switzerland and Canada. European journal of ageing, 14(4), 375-383.

Impact factor =0; Punctaj = Punctaj =0.2x2/2 = 0.2

Citări ale capitolului: Ivan, L., Dumitriu, D. L., & Savuelscu, R. (2016, June). Older people in digital creation contexts:Building a participatory action research design. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development; Zbuchea, A., Nikolaidis, D., Eds (pp. 52-63).

Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older People, Mobile Communication and Risks. Societies, 7(2), 7. Impact factor =0; Punctaj = Punctaj =0.2x2/2 = 0.2

Citări ale articolului: Ivan, Loredana, Frunzaru, Valeriu şi Pricopie, Remus (2008). Decizia de a alege o facultate:

raţionalitate sau condiţionare socială. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 14, 83-97.

Titan, E., Ardelean, A., Manea, D., Boboc, C. & Andreea, B. (2015). The Main Factors that Influence the Decision in Choosing a Path

in Tertiary Education. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 850-854.

Punctaj (0.2 +4x 0) x 2/3 = 0.2 x2/3 = 0.13

Citări ale articolului: Daamen, D. D., Terwel, B. W., ter Mors, E., Reiner, D. M., Schumann, D., Anghel, S., ... & Ziogou, F.

(2011). Scrutinizing the impact of CCS communication on opinion quality: focus group discussions versus Information-Choice

Questionnaires: results from experimental research in six countries.Energy Procedia, 4, 6182-6187.

Anghel, S. (2017). Impact of CCS Communication on the General and Local Public in Romania-Oltenia Region. Energy Procedia, 114, 7343-7347. Punctaj (0.2 +4x 0) x 2/3 = 0.2 x2/26 = 0.01

Pietzner, Katja. "Gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz." (2015). In CO2: Abtrennung, Speicherung, Nutzung, pp. 671-697. Springer Berlin

Heidelberg. Punctaj (0.2 +4x 0) x 2/3 = 0.2 x2/26 = 0.01

Citări ale articolului: Duduciuc, Alina & Ivan, Loredana (2014). Brand naming: sound symbolism, brand preference and

brand performance. Studies and Scientific Research. Economics Edition, 20, 79-85

Erkollar, A., & Oberer, B. (2016). Multidimensional Dashboards for Evaluating Strategic Brand Management Processes for Multi-

brand Companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 505-513., Impact factor = 0; Punctaj =0.2x2/2 = 0.2

Citări ale articolului: Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana (2011). Atitudinea faţă de muncă în subcultura creativă. Calitatea

vieţii, 1, 49-59

Surugiu, R. (2016). The Fragile Professional Identities of Digital Journalists in Romania. In Virtual Workers and the Global Labour

Market (pp. 179-198). Palgrave Macmillan UK.Impact factor =0; Punctaj = Punctaj =0.2x2/2 = 0.2

Citări ale articolului: Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia & Ivan, Loredana (2013): Older people and mobile communication in two

European contexts, Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 15(3), 83-98

Petrovcic, A., Vehovar, &V., Dolnicar, V. (2016). Landline and mobile phone communication in social companionship networks of

older adults: An empirical investigation in Slovenia. Technology in Society. Impact factor =0.7 ; Punctaj = (0.2+4x0.7) x2/2 =3

Sin, A. K., Ahmad, A., Zaman, H. B., & Sulaiman, R. (2014, November). A wearable device for the elderly: A case study in

Malaysia. In Information Technology and Multimedia (ICIMU), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 318-323). IEEE.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/2 = 0.2

Citări ale articolului: ter Mors, E., Terwel, B., Daamen, D., Reiner, D., Schumann, D., Anghel, S., Boulouta, I., Cismaru,

D., Constantin, C., de Jager,C.; Dudu, A., Esken, A.; Falup, O., Firth, R., Gemeni, V., Hendriks, C., Ivan, L., Koukouzas, N., Markos,

A., Næss, R., Pietzner, K., Samoila, I., Sava, C.; Stephenson, M., Tomescu, C., Torvatn, H., Tvedt, S., Valentin, D., West, J., Ziogou,

F. (2013). A comparison of techniques used to collect informed public opinions about CCS: opinion quality after focus group

discussions versus information-choice questionnaires. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 18, 256-263.

Volken, S. P., Xexakis, G., & Trutnevyte, E. (2018). Perspectives of informed citizen panel on low-carbon electricity portfolios in Switzerland and longer-term evaluation of informational materials. Environmental science &

technology, 52(20), 11478-11489. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x6.6)x2/26 = 2 Thomas, G., Pidgeon, N., & Roberts, E. (2018). Ambivalence, naturalness and normality in public perceptions of carbon capture and storage in biomass, fossil energy, and industrial applications in the United Kingdom.

Energy research & social science, 46, 1-9. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x3.8)x2/26 = 1.1 Hossain, M. A., Abbott, E. L., Chua, D. K., Nguyen, T. Q., & Goh, Y. M. (2018). Design-for-Safety knowledge library

for BIM-integrated safety risk reviews. Automation in Construction, 94, 290-302. Punctaj = (0.2 +4x4)x2/26 = 1.2 Kunene-Ngubane, P., Chimonyo, M., & Kolanisi, U. (2018). Possibility of organic beef production on South African

communal farms. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 46(1), 1-13. Punctaj = (0.2 )x2/26 = 0.01 Braun, C., Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G., Rehdanz, K., & Schmidt, U. (2017). Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: survey evidence. Climate Policy, 1-14. Impact factor= 2,73 0.2+4x2.73)x2/24 = 0.9

Karimi, F., & Komendantova, N. (2017). Understanding experts’ views and risk perceptions on carbon capture and storage in three European countries. GeoJournal, 82(1), 185-200. Braun, C. (2017). Not in my backyard: CCS sites and public perception of CCS. Risk Analysis. Dec;37(12):2264-2275.

doi: 10.1111/risa.12793 Jones, C. R., Olfe-Kräutlein, B., Naims, H., & Armstrong, K. (2017). The social acceptance of carbon dioxide utilisation: a review and research agenda. Frontiers in Energy Research, 5, 11. Impact factor =1,52. 0.2+4x4.56)x2/24 = 0.9 Karimi, F. (2017). Timescapes of CCS projects: is deferring projects and policies just kicking the can down the road?. Energy Procedia, 114, 7317-7325. Lockwood, Toby. "Public outreach approaches for carbon capture and storage projects." (2017). Oltra, C., Dütschke, E., Sala, R., Schneider, U., & Upham, P. (2017). The public acceptance of Hydrogen Fuel Cell applications in Europe. Revista internacional de sociología, 75(4), 5. Impact factor = 0.4

Jones, C. R., Olfe-Kraeutlein, B., & Kaklamanou, D. (2017). Lay perceptions of Carbon Dioxide Utilisation technologies in the United Kingdom and Germany: An exploratory qualitative interview study. Energy Research & Social Science, 34, 283-293. Digmayer, C., & Jakobs, E. M. (2017, July). Sustainability or eco fraud? Perception and communication of ‘carbon capture and usage’. In Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 2017 IEEE International (pp. 1-7). IEEE

Dutschke, E. et al. (2016). Differences in the public perception of CCS in Germany depending on CO2 source, transport option and

storage location. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 53, 149-159.

Impact factor =4.56 ; Punctaj = (0.2+4x4.56)x2/24 =18.44x2/24 = 1.5

Corry, O. & Reiner, D. (2016). It’s the Society, Stupid! Communicating Emergent Climate Technologies in the Internet Cambridge

Working Papers in Economics. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5714. Impact factor =0; P Punctaj =0.2x2/24 =0.01

Karayannis, V., Charalampides, G., & Lakioti, E. (2014). Socio-economic Aspects of CCS Technologies. Procedia Economics and

Finance, 14, 295-302. Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/30 = = 0.01

Daamen, D. D., Terwel, B. W., ter Mors, E., Reiner, D. M., Schumann, D., Anghel, S., ... & Ziogou, F. (2011). Scrutinizing the impact

of CCS communication on opinion quality: focus group discussions versus Information-Choice Questionnaires: results from

experimental research in six countries.Energy Procedia, 4, 6182-6187. (Impact factor 0.8). Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 0.8)x 2/30 = = 0.2

Citări ale articolului: Ivan, Loredana, Pricopie, Remus, Frunzaru, Valeriu, Cismaru, Diana & Corbu, Nicoleta (2012). The

risk of dropping education for Romanian high-school students. Structural factors and educational policies. Procedia - Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2312-2321

Momanu, M., & Hojbota, A. M. (2013). School Dropout in the Context of the Romanian Educational System, Current Trends,

Correlates and Interventions.Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii" Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iaşi. Ştiinţe ale Educatiei, (XVII), 117-130. Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/5 = = 0.08

Citări ale articolului: Pietzner, K., Schumann, D., Tvedt, S., Torvatn, H., Naess, R., Reiner, Anghel, S., Cismaru, D.,

Constantin, C., Daamen, D., Dudu, A., Esken, A., Gemeni, V., Ivan, L., Koukouzas, N., Kristiansen, G., Markos, A., ter Mors,

E., Nihfidov, OC, Papadimitriou, J., Samoila, I, Sava, C., Stephenson, M., Terwel, B, Tomescu, C., Ziogou, F. (2011). Public

awareness and perceptions of CCS: Insights for surveys administered to representative samples in six European countries.

Energy Procedia, 4, 6300-6306.

Braun, C., Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G., Rehdanz, K., & Schmidt, U. (2018). Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: survey evidence. Climate Policy, 18(4), 471-484.

Punctaj = (0.2 +4x3.83)x2/26 = 1.1 Karimi, F., & Toikka, A. (2018). General public reactions to carbon capture and storage: Does culture matter?.

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 70, 193-201.

Punctaj = (0.2 +4x4.5)x2/26 = 1.4

Karimi, F., Toikka, & A., Hukkinen, J.I. (2016). Comparative socio-cultural analysis of risk perception of Carbon Capture and Storage

in the European Union. Energy Research, and Social Science, 21, 114-122.

Impact factor =0; Punctaj =0.2x2/24 =0.01

Karimi, F., & Komendantova, N. (2015). Understanding experts’ views and risk perceptions on carbon capture and storage in three

European countries. GeoJournal, 82(1), 85-200. Punctaj (0.2 +4x 0) x 2/26 = 0.2 x2/26 = 0.01

de Bruine de Bruin, W., Mayer, L. A., & Morgan, M. G. (2015). Developing communications about CCS: three lessons learned.

Journal of Risk Research, 18(6), 699-705.

Punctaj (0.2 +4x 1.27) x 2/26 = 5.28 x 0.07 = 0.36

Lofstedt, R. (2015). Effective risk communication and CCS: the road to success in Europe. Journal of Risk Research, (ahead-of-print),

1-17. (Impact factor 1.27) Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 1.27)x 2/26 = = 0.36

Schumann, D. (2015). Public Acceptance. In Carbon Capture, Storage and Use(pp. 221-251). Springer International Publishing.

Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/26 = = 0.01

Schumann, D., Duetschke, E., & Pietzner, K. (2014). Public perception of CO2 offshore storage in Germany: regional differences and

determinants. Energy Procedia, 63, 7096-7112. (Impact factor 0.8). Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 0.8)x 2/26 = = 0.2

Karimi, F., & Toikka, A. (2014). The relation between cultural structures and risk perception: How does social acceptance of carbon

capture and storage emerge? Energy Procedia, 63, 7087-7095. Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 0.8)x 2/26 = = 0.2

Karayannis, V., Charalampides, G., & Lakioti, E. (2014). Socio-economic Aspects of CCS Technologies. Procedia Economics and

Finance, 14, 295-302. Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/26 = 0.01

Lock, S. J., Smallman, M., Lee, M., & Rydin, Y. (2014). “Nuclear energy sounded wonderful 40 years ago”: UK citizen views on

CCS. Energy Policy, 66, 428-435. (Impact factor 3.4). Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 3.4)x 2/26 = 0.9

Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G., Kniebes, C., Rehdanz, K., & Schmidt, U. (2014).Exploring public perception of solar radiation

management (No. 1892). Kiel Working Paper. Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/26 = 0.01

Setiawan, A. D., & Cuppen, E. (2013). Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia. Energy Policy, 61, 1188-

1199. (Impact factor 3.4). Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 3.4)x 2/26 = 0.9

Vercelli, S., Anderlucci, J., Memoli, R., Battisti, N., Mabon, L., & Lombardi, S. (2013). Informing people about CCS: a review of

social research studies. Energy Procedia, 37, 7464-7473. (Impact factor 0.8). Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 0.8)x 2/26 = 0.2

Lämmle, M., & Marth, H. (2012). Assessment of the global potential for CO2 mitigation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) until

2050 (Doctoral dissertation, Diploma thesis, Karlsruhe). Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/26 = 0.01

Kraeusel, J., Möst, D. (2012).Carbon Capture and Storage on its way to large-scale deployment: Social acceptance

and willingness to pay in Germany Energy Policy, 49, 642 – 651 (Impact factor 2.723) Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 2.72)x 2/26 = 0.8

Markusson, N., Shackley, S., & Evar, B. (Eds.). (2012). The social dynamics of carbon capture and storage: understanding CCS

representations, governance and innovation. Routledge. Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/26 = 0.01

de Best-Waldhober, Brunsting, M.S. & Paukovic, M. (2012). Public concepts of CCS: Understanding of the Dutch

general public and its reflection in the media. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1, 1-9 (Impact factor 5.11) Punctaj

(0.2 + 4 x 5.11)x 2/26 = 1.44

Parfomak, E. C. (2012). Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide: Socioeconomic Characteristics and Landowner Acceptance of

Carbon Sequestration Sites. George Mason University. Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/26 = 0.01

Terwel, B.W, ter Mors, E & Daamen, D.D.L. (2012). It’s not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents

regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 9, 41-51

(Impact factor 5.11) Punctaj = (0.2 + 4 x 5.11)x 2/26= 1.44

Moutenet, J-P & Bédard (2012). Public awareness and opinion on CCS in the province of Québec, Canada. Greenhouse Gases: Science

and Technology, 2(2), 126-135. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/26 = 0.01

Markusson, N, Shackley, S & Evar, B. (2012). The Social dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage. Londra: Routledge Punctaj

0.2x2/26 = 0.01

Poumadère, M., Bertoldo, R., & Samadi, J. Article type: Advanced Review Public perceptions and governance of controversial

technologies to tackle climate change: Nuclear power, carbon capture and storage, wind, and geoengineering. Centro de Investigação e

Intervenção Social (CIS), ISCTE-IUL, Lisbon, Portugal Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Climate Change (Impact Factor: 4.4). 09/2011; 2(5):712 –

727. Punctaj = (0.2 + 4 x 4.4)x 2/26= 1.24

Citări ale articolului: Ivan, Loredana (2012). ‘Religious in my own way”: Students religious relativism and self-actualizing

values. Review of research and social intervention, 36, 130-143. Total= 4.4

Mathew (2015). Religion and the Cultures of Higher Education: Student Christianity in the UK. In Issues in Religion and Education,

whose Religion? Beaman, Lori & Van Arragon, Leo Leiden: Brill. 25: 346 -366. Punctaj (0.2 +4x 0) x 2/1 = 0.2x2 = 0.4

Guest, M., Aune, K., Sharma, S., & Warner, R. (2013). Christianity and the university experience: understanding student

faith. A&C Black. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Chang, H. J., Wang, K. Y., & Lin, S. Y. (2012). When Backpacker Meets Religious Pilgrim House: Interpretation of Oriental Folk

Belief. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 11(32), 76-92. (Impact factor 0.35). Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 0.35) x 2/1 = 3.2

Guest, M. (2015). Religion and the cultures of Higher Education: student Christianity in the UK. Issues in Religion and Education:

Whose Religion? Leiden: Brill, pp. 346-366. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Citări ale cărţii: Pricopie, Remus, Frunzaru, Valeriu, Corbu, Nicoleta, Ivan, Loredana, Bârgăoanu, Alina (2011).

Acces şi echitate în învăţământul superior din România. Dialog cu elevii şi studenţii.Bucureşti: Comunicare.ro. Total = 0.24

Abraham, F. (2016). Romania Since the Second World War: A Political, Social and Economic History. Bloomsbury Publishing. Impact

factor =0; Punctaj =0.2 x2/5 = 0.08

Frunzaru, Valeriu (2010), Romania: The commodification of work during the economic crisis .În Lyuben Tomev & Marc Meinardus

(Eds.). Employment Policies in South-East Europe. Common Challenges and Different Scenarios, Sofia, Friedrich Ebert Foundation.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/5 = 0.08.

Sondergaard, Lars & Murthi, Mamta (Eds.) (2012). Skills, not just diplomas. Managing education for results in Eastern Europe and

Central Asia, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. Punctaj Punctaj 0.2 x 2/5 = 0.08

Citări ale articolului: Ivan, Loredana, (2012). Sex role identity, nonverbal sensitivity and potential leadership style Procedia

- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1720-1729.

Curseu, Petru Lucian, and Ioan Pop-Curseu. "Gender in the afterlife: An exploration of dynamic gender stereotypes in the epitaphs of the Merry Cemetery of Săpânța." Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018): 1436.

Punctaj = (0.2 +4x2.08)x2/1 = 17

Suar, D., & Gochhayat, J. (2016). Influence of Biological Sex and Gender Roles on Ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 199-

208. Impact factor = 1.55; Punctaj =(0.2+4x1.55) x2 =12.8

Malmir, A., & Azizzadeh, F. (2013). Evaluation of Self-leadership Statue and Providing Solutions to Improve the Self

leadership Statue (Payam Noor University-Kermanshah Branch Case Study). International Journal of Managing Public

Sector Information and Communication Technologies (IJMPICT), 4(1), 3-17. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Suar, D., & Gochhayat, J. (2014). Influence of Biological Sex and Gender Roles on Ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics,

1-10. Impact factor 0.96. Punctaj = (0.2 + 4 x 0.96)x 2/1= 8.08

Ullberg, G.H. & Kundla, T. (2014) The Development of Next Generation Leadership in Malaysia. Department of Technology

Management and Economics Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Gooraki, E., Noroozi, H., Marhamati S., & Behzadi, F. (2013). The effect of leadership style on the employees’ job motivation in

health care centers in Shiraz. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 1(2), 59-63. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Malmir, A., & Azizzadeh, F. (2013). Work in Progress: Evaluating and Providing Solutions for Self-Leadership. International Public

Management Review, 14(2), 66-86. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Citări ale articolului: Ivan, Loredana (2011). The importance of popularity, rational thinking style and nonverbal sensitivity to

achieve academic success. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 725-734.

Darvish, H., Ahmadi, A., Kafashzadeh, A., Farid, S., & Nejatizadeh, N. (2013). Investigating the effects of intellectual capital

on organizational performance measurement through organizational learning capabilities. Management Science

Letters, 3(1), 165-172. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Darvish, H., & Ayagh, H. (2013). An empirical study to investigate the effects of thinking styles on emotional intelligence: A case

study of Jihad Agriculture Organization of east Azerbaijan province. Management Science Letters, 3(5), 1363-1368.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Citări ale articolului: Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2010). Being in control by taking voluntary risk in

contemporary society. Sociologie românească, 1, 80-87.

Jderu, Gabriel (2015). Cultura motocicletelor. Studii de sociologia moto-mobilitatii. Bucuresti: Editura Tritonic

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/2 = 0.2

Jderu, Gabriel (2013). Motorcycles, body and risk: The motorcyclists’ social career. Journal of Sociology, 1(1), 1-14.

Punctaj = (0.2 + 4 x 0.88)x 2/2=3.72

Jderu, Gabriel (201l). Motorcycles, Body and Emotions. The Motorcyclist's social career. In B. M. Pirani (Ed.). Learning from

memory: Body, memory and technology in a globalizing world (pp.66-82). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing .

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/2 = 0.2

Citari ale raportului: Katja Pietzner, Diana Schumann, Sturle D Tvedt, Hans Y Torvatn, Robert Næss, David M Reiner, Sorin

Anghel, Diana Cismaru, Carmencita Constantin, Dancker DL Daamen, Alexandra Dudu, Andrea Esken, Vassiliki Gemeni,

Loredana Ivan, Nikolaos Koukouzas, Glenn Kristiansen, Angelos Markos, Emma ter Mors, Oana C Nihfidov, John Papadimitriou,

Irene R Samoila, Constantin S Sava, Bart W Terwel, Claudia E Tomescu, Fotini Ziogou (2010). Scrutinizing the impact of CCS

communication on the general and local public: results of the representative national surveys of public awareness, knowledge and

opinions concerning CCS. Wuppertal Inst. für Klima, Umwelt Energie. Wuppertal, Germany.

Hetland, J., Lindeberg, E., Torvanger, A., Buhr, K., Koljonen, T., et al. (2010). Potential for carboncapture and storage (CCS) in the

Nordic region. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland: JULKAISIJA – UTGIVARE – PUBLISHER

Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/28 = 0.01

Samadi, S., & Lechtenböhmer, S. (2010). Technical analysis and comparison of underlying scenarios for the forthcoming European

Commission White Paper on a 2030 climate and energy policy framework. Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/28 = = 0.01

Schumann, D., & PIETZNER, K. (2009). Scrutinizing the impact of CCS communication on the general and local public. Results of the

comparative study of CCS communication methods in Germany. Institute of Energy Research. Systems Analysis and Technology

Evaluation (IEF-STE) Punctaj = 0.2 x 2/28 = = 0.01

Citări ale cărţii: Ivan, Loredana (2009). Cele mai importante 20 de secunde. Competenţa în comunicarea nonverbală. Bucureşti:

Editura Tritonic.

Huma, B. (2015). Enhancing the authenticity of assessments through grounding in first impressions.British Journal of Social

Psychology, 54(3), 405-424. Punctaj (0.2 +4x 2.5) x 2/1 = (0.2 +10)x2 =20.4

Bobb, Andreea. (2014). Moralitate, emotii si cognitii. Influenta starii afective asupra auto- si hetero-atribuirii. Bucuresti: Editura

Universitatii din Bucuresti. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Duduciuc, A. (2012). Morality versus competence in social perception of political candidates. Sfera Politicii, (171), 68-74.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Ciobanu, I., & Avrigean, D. L. (2014). Expresivităţi ale comportamentului mincinosului. Papers of the Sibiu Alma Mater University

Conference, 8th edition, 27-29 March. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/1 = 0.4

Citări ale cărţii: Chelcea, Septimiu, Ivan, Loredana & Chelcea, Adina. (2008). Comunicarea nonverbală: gesturile şi postura

Bucureşti (editia a doua revazuta): Editura Comunicare.ro.

Lesenciuc, A., Susan, A.M., Popica, V, Cretu, I.T. (2014). The proxemic code beyond the cultural connotations: elements of human

typology in military drill regulations. Redefining Community in Intercultural Context. Brasov: ‘Henri Coandă’ Air Force Academy

Publishing House. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Mindu, G. K. (2011) Relația dintre funcționarea familiei și aptitudinea copilului de a decoda mesaje nonverbale. Romanian Journal of

Applied Psychology, 13(1), 29-36. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Citări ale capitolului: Chelcea, S., Ivan, L., Jderu, G., Kalambayi, F., Malureanu, R., Moldoveanu, A. si Zodieru, A. (2008).

Ancheta sociologică: frauda intelectuală, ruşinea şi vinovăţia în universităţi. În S. Chelcea. (coord). Ruşinea şi vinovăţia în

spaţiul public. Pentru o sociologie a emoţiilor (pp. 270-305). Bucuresti: Editura Humanitas. Total 0.5

Rujoiu, O. şi Rujoiu, V. (coord.)(2012). Violenţa în familie. Între percepţie socială şi asumare individuală. Bucureşti: Editura ASE.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/7 = 0.5

Rujoiu, O. (2009). Academic Dishonesty: Copy-Paste Method. Shame and Guilt among Romanian High School Students. Revista

Română de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, 11 (2), 45-63. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/7 = 0.05

Citări ale cărţii: Chelcea, Septimiu, Ivan, Loredana & Chelcea, Adina. (2005). Comunicarea nonverbală: gesturile şi postura

Bucureşti: Editura Comunicare.ro.

Indreica, E.S., & Henter, R. (2014). Mother-toddler relationship based on synergological reading-an analytical study.,

Journal Plus Education, 160-164. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Paunescu, A., & Indreica, E.S. (2014). Use of nonverbal communication in preschoolers emotional developmentUSE OF

Journal Plus Education, 10(2), 283-292. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Gîfu, D., & Andrei, C. (2014). Critical discourse analysis–a method of anticipating economic crisis. Topical Communication

Uncertainties. In Florentin Smarandache and Ştefan Vlăduţescu: Communication Neutrosophic Routes. Education

Publishing, Ohio, USA, Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Amalancei, B. M. (2014). Gestures and Dialogic Communication. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 902-906.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Buja, E & Stanca, M. (2012).Structure, Use, and Meaning Linguistic Studies. Cluj Napoca: Editura Casa Cartii de Stiinta.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Nistor, Gheorghiţa (2012). The role of nonverbal communication in interpersonal relations. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences,

46, 552-556. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Unguru, Elena (2010). Features of lie in verbal and nonverbal communication. Postmodern Openings, 2, 95-108.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Teodorescu, Cristina-Nicola (2010). La communication non verbale dans la classe de fle. Annals of the University of Craiova. Series

Philology. Linguistics, 12, 190-201. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Mehedin, Mihai (2010). Rolul paradigmei etologice în ştiinţeşe comunicării. Revista de eseuri şi comentarii politice, 3, 31-50. Punctaj

0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Craia, S. (2008). Dicționar de comunicare, mass-media și știința informării. Bucuresti: Editura Meronia. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Ardeleanu, S.M. (2008). Doua modalitati antagonice stanga/dreapta. Stidiu comparativ.. Studii şi cercetǎri lingvistice,58(2), 243.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Lesutan, I. (2007). Forme comunicaţionale ale influenţei sociale. Societate si politica, 1 , 90-106. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/3 = 0.1

Citări ale articolului: Funieru, Cristian, Ţandără, Adrian, Cuculescu, Marian, Ranga, Roxana, Comeş, Cristian, Panaitescu,

Eugenia & Ivan Loredana (2006). Statistical correlations concerning dental and periodontal status and the level

of education in oral health in pupils of Bucharest schools. OHDMBSC, 5(3), 11-17.

Funieru, C, Klinger, A, Baicus, C., Funieru, E., Dumitriu, H.T. & Dumitriu, A. (2016). Epidemiology of gingivitis in schoolchildren in

Bucharest, Romania: a Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Periodontal Research.Impact factor =2.47 ; Punctaj =(0.2+4x2.47) x2/7 =2.88

Funieru, C., Twetman, S., Funieru, E., Dumitrache, A. M., Sfeatcu, R. I., & Baicus, C. (2014). Caries experience in

schoolchildren in Bucharest, Romania: The PAROGIM study. Journal of public health dentistry, 74(2), 153-158. (Impact factor 1.64)

Punctaj = (0.2 + 4 x 1.64)x 2/2=1.93

Zmarandache, D.D & Luca, R. (2012). Socio-behavioral factors and dental caries severity in a group of school schildren. International

Journal of Medical Dentistry, 2(3), 182-187. 0.2 x 2/7 = 0.05

Funieru, C., Ţandără, A., Cuculescu, M., Ranga, R., Comeş, C., Panaitescu, E. & Dumitriu, A, Dumitriu, H. T (2008).

Knowledges of Bucharest schools pupils concearning oral health. OHDMBSC, 7(2), 19-24. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/7 = 0.05

Citări ale cărţii: Septimiu Chelcea, Loredana Ivan, Gabriel Jderu & Andreea Moldoveanu (2006). Psihosociologie: teorie

si aplicatii Bucuresti: Editura Economica.

Craiu, C.O. (2014). Strategii si tehnici de reconstruire a memoriei sociale dupa evenimentele din 1989. Revista Romana de

Sociologie, 25(1), 7-18 . Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Craiu, C. O. (2013). The organization of Romanian social memory after the December 1989 events. Journal of Comparative

Research in Anthropology and Sociology, (2), 165-180. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Lupaşcu, N. (2012). Propaganda si manipulare, seductie sau convingere?Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty Section:

Political Sciences and European Studies, (1), 103-119. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Atudorei, I., & Mardache, A.(2012). Institutional discrimination in pediatric hospitals. Bulletin of the Transilvania

University of Braşov Series VII: Social Sciences, 5 (54), 120-124. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Udangiu, E. (2012). De-crystallization: from the Anthem of Punks to the Official Conviction of the Communism. Revista de

Stiinte Politice, 35, p.76. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Udangiu, E. (2012). An Approach of the Complexity: The Dialogic Ego–Alter and the “Glocalisation”. International Journal

on Humanistic Ideology, (2), 125-133. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Andronic, R. L., & Andronic, A. (2011). Theoretical models and methods of action on the development of prosocial behavior in

Romania. Review of the Air Force Academy, IX, 1(18), 127-131. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Rusu, M. S. (2011). The structure of mnemonic revolutions. International Review of Social Research, (1), 105-121. Impact factor 0.6

Punctaj (0.2 + 4 x 0.6)x 2/4 = 1.3

Ilut, P. (Ed.) (2011). Studii de sociopsihologie. Cluj-Napoca Presa Universitara Clujeana. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Dumitrascu, L., Dumitrache, M. A., Sfeatcu, R. I., Podoleanu, L., & Podoleanu, E. (2011). Oral health education

of schoolchildren through audio-visual methods. In E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB), 2011 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Roşan, A. (2009). The characteristics of school violenece in aurbal and rural areas. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Psychologia

Paedagogia, (1), 101-114. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Cristescu, I. (2008). Emoţiile din perspectiva schimbului social. Sociologie românească, 3/4, 185-196. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Iluţ, P. (2007). Social capital, trust, and information: some consequences for social policy. Sociologie Românească, 3, 3-22.

Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Citare acapitolului: Chelcea, S., Duduciuc, A., Ivan, L. & Moldoveanu, A. (2004). Atractivitatea feţei feminine. În S.Chelcea

(coord.). Comunicarea nonverbală în spaţiul public (pp. 95-119). Bucureşti: Editura Tritonic.

Chelcea, S. (2012). Psihosociologia publicităţii. Despre reclamele vizuale. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

Chelcea, S. (2006). Opinia publică. Strategii de persuasiune şi manipulare. Bucureşti: Editura Economica. Punctaj 0.2 x 2/4 = 0.1

I 10

Editor al unei reviste

editate în străinătate care

este indexată ISI sau

indexată într-o bază

internaţională

recunoscută;

Membru în comitetul de

redacţie al unei asemenea

reviste

Punctaj 3 Membru în board-ul revistei Societies (indexată Web of Science) https://www.mdpi.com/journal/societies/editors

I 11 Editor al unei reviste

editate în ţară care este Punctaj

0.5

Membru în comitetul de redacţie al Romanian Journal of Comunication and Public Relations (revista din România, indexata în 6 baze

internaţionale), din 2014

indexată ISI sau indexată

într-o bază internaţională

recunoscută;

Membru în comitetul de

redacţie al unei

asemenea reviste

I 12

Coordonator al unei

colecţii (serii de volume)

editate de o editură cu

prestigiu internaţional;

Membru în comitetul

ştiinţific al unei asemenea

serii/ colecţii;

Coordonator al unei

colecţii (serii de volume)

editate de o editură din

ţară;

Membru în comitetul

ştiinţific al unei asemenea

serii/ colecţii

0

I 13

Coordonarea unui proiect

de cercetare finanţat cu

echivalentul a cel puţin

50.000 lei de o entitate din

străinătate

Punctaj =3

Director grant de cercetare finanţat de ACT project Canada

Cod proiect: 895-2013-1018

Titlul proiectului: Netnography of grandmothers’ use of Facebook for family communication with children and

grandchildren living abroad

Durata: 1.10.2015 - 1.10.2016

Valoarea finanţării: 25.000 RON ( echivalent in CAD)

S-a obținut continuation of funding pentru suma de 30.000 RON (echivalent in CAD)

Grannies on the Net: Comparative Case Study of Canada, Romania, Peru

and Israel – proiectul de va finaliza în 2018

Punctaj =3

I 14

Coordonarea unui proiect

de cercetare finanţat cu

echivalentul a cel puţin

50.000 lei de o entitate

din ţară

Punctaj =2

Director grant de cercetare cod 0429, finantat de UEFISCDI, programul Tinere echipe

Titlul proiectului: Relatia dintre tehnologie si varsta: intelegerea anxietatii fata de computer la persoanele varstnice

Durata: 1.10.2015 - 30.09.2017

Valoarea finanţării: 54.602 RON Punctaj =2

I 15

Profesor/cercetător invitat

(guest) la o universitate de

prestigiu din străinătate,

pentru o perioadă de cel

puţin o lună

Punctaj=

4

Octombrie 2003 – iunie 2004 Marie Curie Fellow - Inter University Center for Methodology, Universitatea Groningen, Olanda (9

luni). Punctaj =2

1 0ctombrie 2011- 31 martie 2012 – visiting researcher: Institutul de Psihologie, Departamentul de Psihologie Socială şi

Organizaţională, Universitatea Humboldt, Berlin (6 luni). Punctaj =2

I 16

Lucrări prezentate la

conferinţe internaţionale

organizate în străinătate

Punctaj=

55

Ivan, Loredana & Mocanu, Florinela (2020). Older People and Technology use: The Importance of Using Video Stimuli in Group

Discussions.6th International Conference, ITAP 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference , HCII 2020,

Copenhagen, Danemarca, Julie 19–24, 2020 Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana. (2020). Interpersonal Communication in the Information Age: Opportunities and Disruptions. International

Symposium: The Network Society Today: (Revising) The Information Age Trilogy, 2-30 Noiembrie (online) – Open University of

Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana & Schiau, Ioana (2019). The use of ICTs in family communication: dialogue with grandmothers. 8th International

Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design Punctaj =1

Ivan Loredana & Eugene Loos (2019). Visual Ageism and Communication Rights for Seniors: Visual Practices and Designing for

Diversity. International Conference: Communication Rights in the Digital Age, 24-25 Octombrie, 2019. Punctaj =1

Loredana Ivan: Education for Democracy in Romania – key note address. 7th

International Social Studies

Education Symposium (USBES7), 11-13 Octombrie, 2018, Kirșeir, Turcia, organizată de Ahi Evran University.

Punctaj =1

Loredana Ivan: Older Audiences and Digital Media in Romania. Lucrare prezentată la Coferința

internațioanală: Knowledge for Ageing Society –Contextualising Ageing, organizată de Comenius University &

Slovak Academy of Science, 27 -28 iunie, 2018, Bratislava, Slovacia. Punctaj =1

Loredana Ivan: Visual ageism – media visual content that affects older people’s lives – TED Talk –

lucrare prezentată la Conferința COST Action IS1402 Ageism from a Multi-National, Interdisciplinary

Perspective: Towards a World for all Ages, Bratislava, Slovacia 28-29 iunie, 2018 Punctaj =1 Video la

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7xnRg-GfaA

Loredana Ivan: The Adequacy of official statistics for studying older people: lucrare prezentată la 15th Annual

ICA Mobile Pre-Conference, organizată de ICA (International Communication Association)22-24 mai, 2018,

Praga, Cehia. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2017). A Participatory Action Design to Reinforce Older People’s Meanings of Computer Tasks

in Digital Creation Contexts. Lucrare prezentată la European Association of Ageing Studies (ENAS). University

of Graz, Austria, 27-30 Aprilie. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2017). Older people ways to communicate in Facebook Communities: A Netnographic

Approach. Lucrare prezentată în cadrul Congresului Mondial al International Association of Gerontology and

Geriatrics (IAGG), 23-27 iulie, San Francisco, USA. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana & Schiau, Ioana (2017). Fighting ageism: older people self deprecating humor in everyday online

conversations. Lucrare prezentată în cadrul Congresului Mondial al International Association of Gerontology

and Geriatrics (IAGG), 23-27 iulie, San Francisco, USA. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2017) The adequacy of official national statistics for public policy on ageing. ECREA Digital

Culture and Communication Section Conference, Brighton, University of Brighton, 6-7 Noiembrie Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana, Hebblethwaite, Shannon (2016). Older People's Use of Facebook: A Netnographic Research of an Online Community.

International Sociological Association Conference (ISA). University of Vienna, Austria, 10-14 Iulie. Punctaj =1

Dumitriu, Diana, Ivan, Loredana, Bîra, Monica (2016). The Role of the Visual Content in Older People’s Use of Social Media. Thomas

C. Dowden International Conference Media and the Public Sphere. Organised by: SNSPA, Cox Center University of Georgia, and

University of Lyon 2, University of Georgia, Georgia, US, 20-22 Octombrie Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana, Schiau, Ioana (2016). Experiencing Computer Anxiety Later in Life: The Role of Stereotype Threat. 2nd International

Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population in the context (HCI), Toronto, Canada, 17 - 22 Julie. Punctaj =1

Hill,C.T. Rivas Barros, M., Boehnke, K., Boer, D. Brumbaugh, C.C., Canto y Rodriguez, J.E., Giotsa, A. Carcedo Gonzalez, R, Ivan,

L., Lassu, Z. Lorand, E., Kito, M., Macbeth, M., Razumiejczyk, E., Mari, S. & Torres, C.V (2016). Basic Human Values, Well-Being,

and Intimate Relationships. International Congress of Psychology (ICP), Yokohama, Japonia (15 authors), 24-29 Iulie. Punctaj =1

Hebblethwaite, Ivan, Loredana si Ivan, Loredana (2015). Grannies on the Net: Facilitating intergenerational family communication

through Facebook. IAAG-ER (International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics European Region) 8th Congress, IAAG,

Universitea din Dublin, Irlanda, 23- 26 Aprilie. Punctaj =1

Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia & Ivan, Loredana (2015). Why age is not that important? An aging perspective on computer anxiety,

International Conference, ITAP 2015, Held as Part of HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, USA, 2-7 august. Punctaj = 1

Ivan, Loredana & Schiau, Ioana (2015). Testing the relationship between the sense of humor and loneliness at older people in Romania.

13th European Conference on Psychological Assessment (ECPA). University of Zurich, Elveția, 22-25 iulie. Punctaj = 1

Charles T. Hill, Maria Rivas Barros, Loredana Ivan et al (2015). Correlates of Personal Values in a Cross-Cultural Study of Intimate

Relationship. 14th European Congress of Psychology (ECP). University of Milan, Italia, 7-10 iulie. Punctaj = 1

Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia & Ivan, Loredana (2014). Older people and computer anxiety: Going beyond Assumptions. 5th European

Communication Conference ECREA. ECREA & University Lusofona, Lisabona, Portugalia, 12-15 noiembrie. Punctaj =1

Loredana, Ivan, Stanescu, Dan Florin & Iorga, Elena Madalina (2014). A comparative study regarding anxiety and negative and

positive emotions. INSTALL International Final Conference Reflexivity in Higher Education: Research and Models of Intervention for

Underachievement. SINAPSI, INSTALL project, Federico II, University Napoli, Napoli, 20-21 martie. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana & Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia (2014). Elders and the ITC use to communicate with children and grandchildren. The 7th

International Central And Eastern European Media Conference, CEECOM, Wroclaw University, Wroclaw, Polonia, 12-14 iunie.

Punctaj =1

Hill, C.T. Rivas Barros, M., Boehnke, K., Boer, D. Brumbaugh, C.C., Canto y Rodriguez, J.E., Giotsa, A. Carcedo Gonzalez, R, Ivan,

L., Lassu, Z. Lorand, E., Kito, M., Macbeth, M., Razumiejczyk, E., Mari, S. & Torres, C.V (2014). More than just sex: correlates of

sexual satisfaction across gender, marital status, sex of partners and cultures. International Congress of Applied Psychology (ICAP),

Paris, 8-13 iulie. Punctaj =1

Hill, C.T. Rivas Barros, M., Boehnke, K., Boer, D. Brumbaugh, C.C., Canto y Rodriguez, J.E., Giotsa, A. Carcedo Gonzalez, R, Ivan,

L., Lassu, Z. Lorand, E., Kito, M., Macbeth, M., Razumiejczyk, E., Mari, S. & Torres, C.V. (2014). Correlates and conflict in intimate

relationships: across gender, marital status, sex of partner and cultures. International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology

(IACCP), Rheims, Franta, 15-19 iulie. Punctaj =1

Cismaru, Diana M. & Ivan, Loredana (2013). Risk factors associated with dropout of high school students in Romania. ICERI. The 6th

Conference on Education, Research and Innovation, organizată de IATED, 18-20 noiembrie, Seville, Spania. Punctaj =1

Ivan, L. (2013). The influence of emotion recognition and academic performance on group popularity. International Federation of

Classification Societies Conference (IFCS 2013) 14-17 iulie, Tilburg, Olanda. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana & Fernández-Ardèvol, Mireia (2013). Seniors, risks and mobile communication: comparison between two European

contexts. The Regional Conference ICA/ACOP/AE-IC/UMA, 18-19 iulie, Malaga, Spania. Punctaj =1

Hill, C. T., Rivas Barros, M., Brumbaugh,C. C, Canto y Rodriguez, J.E., Carcedo González, R.J, Ivan, L., Kito, M., Macbeth, G.,

Razumiejczyk, E & Mari, S. (2013). Correlates of love in intimate relationships across gender, sex of partner, marital status, and

cultures. Emotions Pre-Conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 17 ianuarie, New Orleans, LA. Punctaj =1

Hill, C. T., Rivas Barros, M., Brumbaugh,C. C, Canto y Rodriguez, J.E., Carcedo González, R.J, Ivan, L., Kito, M., Macbeth, G.,

Razumiejczyk, E & Mari, S. (2013). Happiness and dimensions of relationship. Intimacy across gender, sex of partner, and cultures.

European Congress of Psychology, 9-12 iulie, Stockholm, Suedia. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2013). Feeling ashamed or feeling guilty: Two emotions with different social consequences. Eighth International

Conference on Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 30 iulie-1august, Praga, Cehia. Punctaj =1

Hill, C. T., Rivas Barros, M., Brumbaugh,C. C, Canto y Rodriguez, J.E., Carcedo González, R.J, Ivan, L., Kito, M.,Macbeth, G.,

Razumiejczyk, E & Mari, S. (2013). Correlates of love in intimate relationships across gender, sex of partner, marital status, and

cultures. Emotions Pre-Conference of The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 17 ianuarie, New Orleans, LA. Punctaj =1

Iva Ivan, Loredana (2012). Elders and the use of mobile phones in Romania: First results of semi-structured interviews. II Open Workshop

A-C-M BCN (Ageing – Communications – Media) organised by The Interdisciplinary Internet Institute (IN3) of the Open University of

Catalonia (UOC), 17-18 octombrie Barcelona, Spania Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2012). Sex role identity, nonverbal sensitivity and potential leadership style. The 4th World Conference on

Educational Sciences, 2-5 februarie, Universitatea din Barcelona, Spania. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana, Pricopie, Remus, Cismaru, Diana & Corbu, Nicoleta (2012). The risk of dropping education for Romanian high-school

students. Structural factors and educational policies. The 4th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 2-5 februarie, Universitatea

din Barcelona, Spania. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2012). Nonverbal sensitivity in judging trustworthiness. Holier than thou effect in brief exposure situations

International Communication Association's 62 nd Annual Conference (ICA), 24-28 mai, Phoenix, AZ. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2012). Sex role identity, communication skills and group popularity. Conferinţa Internaţională: Media et L’Espace

Public Institute de la Communication, Université Lyon 2, Centrul de Cercetare in Comunicare SNSPA şi Cox International Center

University of Georgia US, 2-3 iulie, Université Lyon 2, Franţa. Punctaj =1

Hill, C. T., Rivas Barros, M., Brumbaugh,C. C, Canto y Rodriguez, J.E., Carcedo González, R.J, Ivan, L., Kito, M.,Macbeth, G.,

Razumiejczyk, E & Mari, S. (2012). Cross-Cultural similarities in importance of mate selection criteria. International Association for

Cross-Cultural Research (IACCP) 21st International Congress, 17-21 iulie, Stellenbosch, Africa de Sud. Punctaj =1

Hill, C. T., Rivas Barros, M., Brumbaugh,C. C, Canto y Rodriguez, J.E., Carcedo González, R.J, Ivan, L., Kito, M., Macbeth, G.,

Razumiejczyk, E & Mari, S. (2012). Similarities in correlates of relationship commitment across gender, sexual Orientation and

cultures. 30th International Congress of Psychology (ICP). 22-27 iulie, Capetown, Africa de Sud. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana, (2011). The importance of popularity, rational thinking style and nonverbal sensitivity to achive academic success. The

3rd

International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY), 19-22 octombrie, Istanbul, Turcia. Punctaj = 1

Duduciuc, Alina & Ivan, Loredana (2011). The ability to decode nonverbal cues and information processing. Evidence for a relation

between nonverbal sensitivity and different thinking styles. Conferinţa Internaţională: Cognition, Conduc and Communication

(CCC2011). 6-8 octombrie, Universitatea din Lodz, Polonia. Punctaj=1

Ivan, Loredana, (2011). The relationship between interpersonal sensitivity and individuals’ thinking style. When type of information

processing really matters. Conferinţa Internaţională Interpersonal Communication and Social Interaction (ICSI) organizată de

European Communication Research and EducationAssociation (ECREA) şi Universitatea Ulster Irlanda de Nord, 7-9 Septembrie,

Belfast, UK. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana & Stănescu, Dan F. (2011). Effects of perceived sex role and nonverbal sensitivity on different leadership patterns. The

12th European Congress of Psychology: Understanding & Embracing Diversity (ECP), 4-8 iulie, Istanbul, Turcia. Punctaj =1

Frunzaru, Valeriu, Corbu, Nicoleta, Pricopie, Remus & Ivan, Loredana (2011). Brain drain from Romania: young people’s plans

aftergraduation. Conferinţa Internaţională: Going global? Highly skilled migrants and societal participation, organizată de RWTH

Aahen University, Technical University of Hamburg şi Humboldt University of Berlin. Aachen, 17-18 martie. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana, Frunzaru, Valeriu, Pricopie, Remus şi Corbu, Nicoleta (2011). The risk of dropping school versus enrrolling university

for the Romanian high school pupils. Insides for national educational policies. Conferinţa Internaţională INTED2011 – International

Technology, Education and Development Conference, organizată de International Association of Technology and Education (IATED),

7-9 martie, Valencia, Spania. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2011). Using students’ centrality and prestige in their formal groups and nonverbal sensitivity measures to predict

academic success. Conferinţa Internaţională INTED2011 – International Technology, Education and Development Conference,

organizată de International Association of Technology and Education (IATED), 7-9 martie 201, Valencia, Spania. Punctaj = 1

Frunzaru, Valeriu, Corbu, Nicoleta, Pricopie, Remus & Ivan, Loredana (2011). High school pupils’ choice about college in Romania.

10th Conference of European Sociological Association: Social Relations in Turbulent Times (ESA), 7-10 septembrie, Geneva, Elveţia.

Punctaj =1

Pietzner, K, Schumann, D., Tvedt, S., Torvatn, H., Naess, R, Reiner, D., Daamen, D., Termors, E., Terwel, B., Yiogou, F., Gemeni, V.,

Cismaru, D.M., Ivan, L., Anghel, S., Dudu, A., Samoila, I. (2010). Public awareness and perceptions of CCS: insights for surveys

administered to representative samples in six European countries. International Conference of Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies.

(IEA GHG), 19-23 septembrie, Amsterdam, Olanda. Punctaj =1

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana (2010). Tango lessons in Bucharest. A local community in a global world. XVII World Congress

of Sociology. ‘Sociology on the Move’, 1-17 iulie, Gotteborg, Suedia. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana & Cismaru, Diana M. (2009). Women voices in organizational life in Romania. – Keywords in Communication. A 59-a

Conferinţă Anuală a Asociaţiei Internaţionale de Comunicare (ICA), 21-25 mai, Chicago, IL. Punctaj =1

Frunzaru, Valeriu, Ivan, Loredana & Pricopie, Remus (2009). Family and school performance. How family affects students’ intention

to continue their studies. 1st International Congress of Family, School and Society Special Education, organizată de Universitatea

Fernando Pessoa, 8-13 iulie, Porto, Portugalia Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2008). Using thin slices paradigm to explain people’s accuracy in predicting others social-value orientation in an

interdependency situation. The 6th

International Symposium Communication in the Millenium. Organizat de Istambul University,

University of Texas at Austin şi Anadolu University, 14-16 mai, Istanbul, Turcia. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana & Szakacs, Simona (2003). Romanians’ social representation on ”NATO” and ”EU”. Communication in Borderlands.

A 53-a Conferinţă Anuală a International Communication Association (ICA),, 23-27 mai, San Diego, LA. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2003). Romanians’ social representation on ”NATO” and ”EU”. Al VI-lea Congres Regional al Asociaţiei

Internaţionale de Psihologie Transculturală, 12-16 iulie, Budapesta, Ungaria. Punctaj =1

Ivan, Loredana (2002). Youth academics relative deprivation. Inclusion and Exclusion in Contemporary European Societies:

Conferinţă internaţională şi workshop în cadrul lnterUniversity Centre Dubrovnik, organizat de Universitatea Utrecht şi Universitatea

Amsterdam, 22-26 aprilie, Dubrovnik, Croaţia. Punctaj =1

I 17

Lucrări prezentate la

conferinţe internaţionale

organizate în ţară

Punctaj

=21

Loredana Ivan, Joost van Hoof & Dorin Beu (2020) Smart Cities and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Analysis of

Current Projects and Practices ‘Spotlight 2030’ Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC)

8th Edition, SNSPA December 3-4, 2020. Punctaj = 0.5/3 = 0.16

Georgiana Manole & Loredana Ivan. Emotional Competence: predictors and differences between professions. The 8th

Edition Strategica International Conference, 15-16 Octombrie, SNSPA. Punctaj = 0.5/2 = 0.25

Ivan, Loredana (2019). Using Game Theory to Predict How People Would Share Resources with Unknown

Others. The 7th Edition Strategica International Conference, 10-11 Octombrie, SNSPA. Punctaj = 0.5/1 = 0.5

Corina Buzoianu, Ioana Schiau & Loredana Ivan: Draw me an Old Person: Using Drawings to Assess Students’ Implicit

Ageism, lucrare prezentată la Conferința Internațională Semiosis in Communication, ediția a doua organizată de SNSPA,

14-16 iunie, 2018 Punctaj = 0.5/3 = 0.16

Loredana Ivan & Ioana Schiau: How people are visually represented by their own organisations. A Case Study

of Romanian Pensioners Association. lucrare prezentată la Conferința Internațională Semiosis in

Communication, ediția a doua organizată de SNSPA, 14-16 iunie, 2018 Punctaj = 0.5/2 = 0.25

Ivan, Loredana (2017).Using DANVA Facial Recognition Test to Assess Emotional Intelligence of Top

Management versus Middle Management Positions . 5th

International Conference Strategica, SNSPA &

Romanian National Bank, 28-30 Septembrie. Punctaj = 0.5

Ivan, L. & Schiau, I. (2017). “The Smiling Face”: Grannies on the Net. 3rd International Conference

Qualitative Research in Communication, Bucharest, SNSPA 4-6 Octombrie. Punctaj = 0.25

Ivan, Loredana & Ioana Schiau (2017). Digital Grannies: A Qualitative Investigation of ICT Use by Romanian

Grandmothers. International Colloquium of Social Sciencs and Communication, ACUM,

Brasov, Universitatea Transilvania, 9-11 Noiembrie, 2017. Punctaj = 0.25

Stefăniță, Oana & Ivan, Loredana (2017). Characteristics of digital divide in Romania and differences in Internet

use in comparison with Internet use in Europe. Measuring Development in Turbulent Time International

Conference, București, SNSPA & Guvernul României, 28-29 noiembrie. Punctaj = 0.25

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2017). Healthy life years in Romania and in the EU countries: A

comparative analysis. Measuring Development in Turbulent Time International Conference, București, SNSPA

& Guvernul României, 28-29 noiembrie. Punctaj = 0.25

Ivan, Loredana, Dumitriu, Diana L., Săvulescu, Rodica (2016). Older people in digital creation contexts: building a participatory action

research design. The 9th International Conference for Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development (ICERID). SNSPA

&University of Sheffield, Bucuresti, 23-24 Iunie. Punctaj =0.5

Ivan Loredana, Daba-Buzoianu, Corina (2016). Body image and body self-esteem among Romanian elders. Evidence from quantitative

research. Strategica International Academic Conference. SNSPA &BNR, Bucuresti, 20-21 Octombrie. Punctaj =0.5

Loredana Ivan, Corina Daba-Buzoianu (2016). Seniors on Facebook: creating a participatory action research design. NFO-IMPACT

Informatics and its Impact in our Society: A Vision over Switzerland and Romania. Universitatea Vasile Alecsandri din Bacau, 30 Mai-

3 Iunie. Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana & Hebblethwaite, Shannon (2015). The use of social media in family communication among grandmothers and

grandchildren. Qualitative Research in Communication. SNSPA, Bucureștim, 23-25 septembrie. Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2015). Gender differences in financial literacy: An exploratory study. A 3-a Conferinta Internationala Strategica,

SNSPA & BNR, București, 29-30 octombrie. Punctaj =0.5

Corina Daba-Buzoianu & Loredana Ivan (2015). Identity vs Alterity? Constructing Europe as Alterity during the elections for the

European Parliament in Romania. European Conference on Social and Behavioral Sciences (ECSBS) SNSPA, București, 11-13 iunie

Punctaj =0.5

Loredana Ivan & Corina Daba-Buzoianu (2015). Qualitative research in communication in Romania. Qualitative Research in

Communication, SNSPA, București, 23-25 septembrie. Punctaj =0.5

Loredana Ivan si Corina Daba-Buzoianu (2015). No market for the old men: Ageism discourse and employment. Discursive forms:

New perspectives - language, literature, communication (INTERSTUD). Universitatea Vasile Alecsandri din Bacau, 7-9 mai.

Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2014). The Use of ICTS in Students’ Learning Activities. PR Trend. Medialization. How Media

Changed our Life. International Conference. Universitatea Babes Bolyai. Cluj Napoca., 9-11 mai. Punctaj=0.5

Ivan, Loredana & Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia (2014). Mobile phone use in public places: Observations and reflections of older users.

Media and the Public Sphere. Evaluating Media Ethics in the Digital Era. Cox International Center University of Georgia, SNSPA and

University Lyon II. Bucuresti, SNSPA, 23-24 octombrie. Punctaj=0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2014). Gender differences in investing and savings behavior: the nesting effect. Strategica International Academic

Conference. SNSPA & BNR. Bucuresti., 2-3 octombrie. Punctaj=0.5

Ivan Loredana & Stanescu, Dan Florin (2014). The academic and social integration of non-traditional Romanian students. Results from

an experimental formative training. Al 7-lea Congres al Asociatiei pentru Studii Calitative si Interculturale in Psihologie (ASCIPS).

Modern research in Health, Education and Social Sciences. Quantitative vs. qualitative research?. Universitatea Lucian Blaga, Sibiu,

6-8 noiembrie. Punctaj=0.5

Duduciuc, Alina & Ivan, Loredana (2014). Adolescents and health seeking behavior through ICTs: body image, nutrition and risks. A

Modern Approach of the Anti-Doping Policies. International Conference organizată de ANAD şi Guvernul României. Agentia

Nationala Anti-Doping, Bucuresti., 15-17 octombrie. Punctaj=0.5

Loredana Ivan, Corina Daba-Buzoianu & Alina Duduciuc (2014). Media Coverage of risks related to mobile phone base stations in

Romania. Second International Conference on Natural and Antrophic Risks (ICNAR). Universitatea Vasile Alecsandri, Bacau, 4-7

iunie.

Punctaj=0.5

Loredana Ivan & Corina Daba-Buzoianu (2014). Relation between gender, self-esteem and body self-esteem of young and old elders.

Image, Imaginary, Representation International Conference. INTERSTUD and CETAL Research Centres & Universitatea Vasile

Alecsandri, Bacau, 8-9 mai. Punctaj=0.5

Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia & Ivan, Loredana (2013). Older people and mobile communication, comparison between two European

contexts, Qualitative Research in Communication, Bucureşti, SNSPA, 3-4 octombrie. Punctaj=0.5

Ivan, Loredana, Pricopie, Remus, Frunzaru, Valeriu, Cismaru, Diana & Corbu, Nicoleta (2012). Factori care prezic riscul de

abandon şcolar la elevii de liceu din România. Aspecte structurale şi politici educaţionale. Beyond Globalization? A doua Conferinţă

Internaţională a Societăţii Sociologilor din România (SSR), 31mai-3 iunie Universitatea din Bucureşti, Bucureşti. Punctaj= 0.5

Ivan, Loredana, Cicei, Cristiana-Cătălina & Stănescu, Dan-Florin. (2012). Examining emotional intelligence and nonverbal sensitivity

using MSCEIT and PONS. Conferinţa Internaţională de Ştiinţe Sociale Aplicate (ISSA), 18-20 iunie, Universitatea de Vest

din Timişoara, Timişoara. Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2012). Introspection on romantic relation generated attitudinal change. Psiworld 2012.The International Conference.

Psychology and the Realities of the Contemporary World, a 4-a ediţie, 18-20 Octombrie, Universitatea din Bucureşti, Bucureşti.

Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana, (2011). Nonverbal sensitivity and network centrality. Using our abilities to interpret emotions and become popular.

Conferinţa internaţională Identity and Intercultural Communication (IIC) organizată de SNSPA, Centrul de Cercetare în Comunicare,

Institute de la Communication Université Lyon 2, Cox International Center University of Georgia US şi Fulbright Commission., 26-27

septembrie, SNSPA, Bucureşti. Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana, Stănescu, Dan F. & Iorga, Mădălina E. (2011). Testing nonverbal sensitivity with DANVA and PONS. Evidence for

different accuracy on face and voice channels. Congresul Internaţional de Psihologie ASCIPS. Cercetarea modernă în psihologie:

direcţii şi perspective, organizat de Asociaţia pentru Studii Calitative şi Interculturale în Psihologie (ASCIPS), 3-5 iunie, Sibiu.

Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2011). Stilul cognitiv şi competenţa nonverbală. Validarea modelului cognitiv-experenţial al selfului.Conferinţa

Societăţii Sociologilor din România: Sociologii şi societăţi emergente (SSR), 27- 28 mai .Universitatea din Bucureşti, Bucureşti.

Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana & Duduciuc, Alina (2011). Competenţa interpersonală şi succesul academic. Rolul resurselor relaţionale în predicţia

performanţelor studenţilor.Conferinţa Societăţii Sociologilor din România: Sociologii şi societăţi emergente (SSR), 27- 28 mai

Universitatea din Bucureşti, Bucureşti. Punctaj= 0.5

Ivan, Loredana, Stănescu, Dan F. & Iorga, Mădălina E. (2011). Stiluri de leadership, percepţia propriului rol de gen şi competenţe

interpersonale. Conferinţa Naţională de Psihologie Industrială şi Organizaţională „Alexandru Roşca”, organizată de Asociaţia de

Psihologie Industrială şi Organizaţională (APIO) şi SNSPA, 7-9 aprilie, SNSPA, Bucureşti. Punctaj =0.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu, Corbu, Nicoleta, Ivan, Loredana & Pricopie, Remus (2010). What high school pupils do after graduation.

Recommendations for education and employment policies. Prima Conferinţă Internaţională a Societăţii Sociologilor din România.

Remaking the Social. New Risks and Solidarities, organizată de SSR, 2-4 decembrie, Universitatea Babeş Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca.

Punctaj =0.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu, Corbu, Nicoleta, Pricopie, Remus & Ivan, Loredana (2010). Factors influencing school performances in Romania.

International Conference on Globalization and Changing Patterns in the Public Sphere, organizată de SNSPA, Centrul de Cercetare în

Comunicare şi Fulbright Commission, 12-13 noiembrie, SNSPA, Bucureşti. Punctaj =0.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana (2010). Continuing school. How secondary school students from Romania see their future,

International Conference on Globalization and Changing Patterns in the Public Sphere organizată de SNSPA, Centrul de Cercetare în

Comunicare şi Fulbright Commission, 12-13 noiembrie,SNSPA, Bucureşti. Punctaj= 0.5

Zbuchea, Alexandra & Ivan, Loredana (2010). Reconfiguring PR strategies in the Romanian museums International Conference on

Globalization and Changing Patterns in the Public Sphere, organizată de SNSPA, Centrul de Cercetare în Comunicare şi Fulbright

România., 12-13 noiembrie, SNSPA, Bucureşti. Punctaj = 0.5

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2009). Being in control by taking voluntary risk in contemporary society International

Conference on R&D Perspectives. Promoting Innovation through Education, Culture and Communication, 6-7 noiembrie,

SNSPA.Bucureşti. Punctaj =0.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana (2009). Tango lessons in Bucharest. A local community in a global world. International

Conference on R&D Perspectives. Promoting Innovation through Education, Culture and Communication, 6-7 noiembrie, SNSPA,

Bucureşti. Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2009). Just do it ! Cultura media şi promovarea riscului voluntar în societatea contemporană /

Just do it ! La culture médiatique et la promotion du risque volontaire dans la société contemporaine. Conferinţă internaţională

româno-franceză: Frontières, communautés, médias, organizată de Universitatea din Bucureşti, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis şi

Université du Sud Toulon Var., 11-13 iunie, Universitatea din Bucureşti, Bucureşti. Punctaj =0.5

Zbuchea, Alexandra & Ivan, Loredana (2008). Investigations in museums – the Romanian case. 4th

International Conference on

Applied Statistics, organizată de Institutul Naţional de Statistică şi ASE, 20-22 noiembrie, ASE, Bucureşti. Punctaj =0.5

Ivan, Loredana & Frunzaru, Valeriu (2008). The self-actualizing and the environment protection values. Conferinţă Internaţională

Education, Research and Innovation. Policies and Strategies in the Age of Globalization, 30-31 mai, SNSPA, Bucureşti. Punctaj =0.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana (2008). Social inclusion and cultural creatives. Romania as a new EU member state. Conferinţă

Internaţională Education, Research and Innovation. Policies and Strategies in the Age of Globalization, 30-31 mai 2008, SNSPA,

Bucureşti. Punctaj 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2007). Rolul emoţiilor în cercetarea comportamentului prosocial. Merită să-i ajuţi pe alţii! Congresul Internaţional de

Psihologie. Cercetarea modernă în psihologie: direcţii şi perspective ASCIPS, organizat de Asociaţia pentru Studii Calitative şi

Interculturale în Psihologie (ASCIPS), 8-10 iunie, Sibiu. Punctaj 0.5

Frunzaru, Valeriu & Ivan, Loredana (2007). EU gender employmen policies. Romania as a new member State. Globalization and

policies of development. Conferinţa Internaţională: Globalization and Policies of Development, 18-20 mai, SNSPA, Bucureşti.

Punctaj= 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2006). Thin slices: prezicerea comportamentelor umane pe baza expunerii limitate la persoane stimul. Prima

Conferinţă Internaţională de Psihologie Socială, 27-29 septembri, Universitatea Al. Ioan Cuza, Iaşi. Punctaj 0.5

Ivan, Loredana (2001). Globalization and regionalization - two counter tendences. A 17-a Conferinţă Mondială a Federaţiei Mondiale

pentru Studiile Viitorului(WFSF), 6-9 Septembri, Braşov. Punctaj 0.5

I 18

Beneficiar al unor granturi

individuale sau burse

postdoctorale în valoare

de cel puţin 25.000 lei

Punctaj

1

Proiectul PD ID 62259, grant postdoctoral la Universitatea din Bucureşti, Facultatea de Sociologie şi Asistenţă Socială. Punctaj = 0.5

2012-2016.

Coordonatorul proiectului de cercetare: Competenţă emoţională şi evaluare nterpersonală, al laboratorului Cogniţie Socială şi

Comunicarea Emoţiilor (CSCE) din cadrul Centrului de Cercetare în Comunicare, SNSPA – ”Schema de granturi pentru tinerii

cercetători” din SNSPA. Punctaj = 0.5, 2014-2016

I 19 Introducerea de cursuri

noi Punctaj

1

Am iniţiat, în 2005, cursul Comunicare nonverbală, ca disciplină universitară, la început în sistem facultativ şi apoi ca disciplină

inclusă în programul de învăţământ, la FCRP-SNSPA. Punctaj= 0.5

Am iniţiat, în 2012, cursul Comunicare interpersonală, care este predat ca opţional, pentru studenţii din anul III, FCRP-SNSPA.

Punctaj =0.5

I 20

Membru al unei echipe de

cercetare care

implementează un proiect

finanţat pe bază de

competiţie în valoare de

cel puţin 100.000 lei

Punctaj

5

01.10. 2016-01.10.2021 (Punctaj =1)

Older audiences in the digital media environment:

A cross-national longitudinal study

Rolul în proiect – co-aplicant

Instituţia finanţatoare: Social Sciences and Humanities, Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), ACT project

Bugetu proiectului: 13200 RON

01.10. 2014-01.10.2017 (Punctaj =1)

Ageism - a multi-national, interdisciplinary perspective ISCH COST Action. IS 1402

Rolul in proiect: MC pentru Romania. Membru in echipa de management

Instituţia finanţatoare: European Commission, European Cooperation in Science and Technology

Bugetul proiectului: 1 mil euro

01.10. 2014-01.10.2021 (Punctaj =1)

Manager (pentru România) al proiectului internaţional Social Sciences and Humanities, Research Council of Canada (SSHRC PDG

2011-2014): Ageing Communication, Technologies: Experiencing a digital World Later in Life (ACT). Proiectul reuneşte în

parteneriat, mai multe universităţi şi specialişti, membri ai Ageing Communication Media network. SNSPA este partener în acest

proiect. Manager proiect: Dr. Kim Sawchuk, Concordia University, Canada.

Instituţia finanţatoare: Social Sciences and Humanities, Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)

Bugetul proiectului: 2 mil. CAD

01.2009 – 31.12.2012 (Punctaj =1)

membru în echipa de proiect: Instrumente şi mecanisme de creştere şi facilitare a accesului la învăţământul

superior bazate de dezvoltarea parteneriatelor orizontale şi verticale între instituţii de învăţământ,

structuri centrale şi locale ale sistemuluieducational şi actori sociali/sectoriali.

Coordonator proiect: Şcoala Naţională de Studii Politice şi Administrative

Instituţia finanţatoare: Fondul Structural European

Parteneri: Universitatea din Bucureşti, Facultatea de Sociologie şi Asistenţă Socială, Universitatea Politehnica

din Bucureşti. Buget: 15.605.795 Lei

31.09.2009 – 31.09.2010 (Punctaj =1)

membru în echipa de proiect: FENCO: Scrutinizing The Impact of CCS Communication On The General and

Local PublicERA-NET – Proiect European derulat în: Olanda, Marea Britanie, Germania, Norvegia, România şi

Grecia.

Parteneri în România: Şcoala Naţională de Studii Politice şi Administrative (SNSPA), Institutul Naţional de

Geologie şi Geoecologie Marină (GeoEcoMar), Institutul pentru Studierea Energiei Electrice(ISPE)

Parteneri internaţionali: Universitatea Leiden, Universitatea Cambridge, Forchungszentrum Jülich GmbH

Germania, Institute for Solid FuelsTechnology and Applications (ISFTA) Grecia, Ecofys Olanda,

Universitatea din Macedonia, SINTEF Norvegia, Wuppertal Institue for Climate, Environment and

Energy Germania, British Geological Survey (BGS). Buget SNSPA: 120.000 Lei

I 21

Membru în Consiliul

Naţional de Atestare a

Titlurilor, Diplomelor şi

Calificativelor

Universitare, al

Consiliului Naţional al

Cercetării Ştiinţifice, al

consiliilor de specialitate

ale Agenţiei Române de

Asigurare a Calităţii în

Învăţământul Superior

Punctaj 1 Membru în comisia CNATDCU pentru contestații, Comisia Sociologie, științe politice și administrative https://www.edu.ro/sites/default/files/PROPUNERI%20%20COMISII%20CONTESTATII_tabel.pdf

Punctaj =1

I 22

Studiu, individual sau

colectiv, de evaluare şi

fundamentare de politici

publice elaborat, în urma

unor concursuri de

selecţie, pentru diverse

instituţii publice

guvernamentale/

organizaţii

internaţionale/centre de

cercetare

Punctaj

2.1

Katja Pietzner, Diana Schumann, Sturle D Tvedt, Hans Y Torvatn, Robert Næss, David M Reiner, Sorin Anghel, Diana Cismaru,

Carmencita Constantin, Dancker DL Daamen, Alexandra Dudu, Andrea Esken, Vassiliki Gemeni, Loredana Ivan, Nikolaos

Koukouzas, Glenn Kristiansen, Angelos Markos, Emma ter Mors, Oana C Nihfidov, John Papadimitriou, Irene R Samoila, Constantin

S Sava, Bart W Terwel, Claudia E Tomescu, Fotini Ziogou (2010). Scrutinizing the impact of CCS communication on the general and

local public: results of the representative national surveys of public awareness, knowledge and opinions concerning CCS. Wuppertal

Inst. für Klima, Umwelt, Energie. Wuppertal, Germany.

http://epub.wupperinst.org/solrsearch/index/search/searchtype/authorsearch/author/Emma+ter+Mors/rows/10 Punctaj= 2x2/30 = 0.1

Ivan, Loredana (2014). Particularităţile posted work în România. Studiu realizat pentru CNS Cartel Alfa, Proiectul RIDE. Rights

wIthout borders. Proiect finanţat de European Commission - DG Employment Social Affair and Inclusion Grant agreement no. VS/2014/0012

Punctaj = 2x1/1 = 2

I 23

Participarea în colectivele

de elaborare sau

implimentare a granturilor

sau proiectelor de

dezvoltare instituţională,

socială şi regională;

transfer de cunoaştere şi

instrumente de politici,

asistenţă pentru dezvoltare

ş.a., finanţate de o entitate

regională, naţională sau

din străinătate

Punctaj 9

15.10.2020- 15.03.2021 (Punctaj =1)

Expert cercetare cantitativă

Dezvoltarea unor instrumente de analiză și intervenție la nivel comunitar pentru perioada de programare 2021 – 202

cod 136610/ Cod SIPOCA 862

04.2016-04.2019. (Punctaj =1)

Expert cercetare cantitativă

Proiect: Starea naţiunii. Construirea unui instrument inovator pentru fundamentarea politicilor publice Coordonator proiect: SGG și Şcoala Naţională de Studii Politice şi Administrative

Instituţia finanţatoare: SIPOCA, Cod proiect: SIPOCA 11

01.2010 – 31.04. 2013 (Punctaj =1)

expert pe termen scurt : Dezvoltarea resurselor umane în educaţie şi formare profesională.

Stilul de învăţare şi temperamentul şcolarilor - instrumente pentru o educaţie creativă.

POSDRU/87/1.3/S/61341

Coordonator proiect: Şcoala Naţională de Studii Politice şi Administrative

Parteneri:Institutul de Stiinte ale Educatiei (ISE)

Instituţia finanţatoare: Fondul Structural European

01.2010 – 31.04. 2013 (Punctaj =1)

Expert trainer pe termen scurt: E.H. R. – Antreprenoriat pentru resurse umane

POSDRU/92/3.1/S/53763

Coordonator proiect: Şcoala Naţională de Studii Politice şi Administrative

Parteneri: Federaţia Junior Chamber International România, D&D Research, Asociaţia Naţională a Editorilor şi

Autorilor de Teste Psihologice şi Educaţionale.

2020-2022 (Punctaj =1)

Coordonator, împreună cu cu Hannah Marston (the Open University UK) ai proiectuluiCOVID19: Technology, Social Connections,

Loneliness & Leisure Activities. Sursa de finanțare: Open univesity UKhttps://healthwellbeing.kmi.open.ac.uk/covid-19/technology-

social-connections-loneliness-leisure-activities/#).

2017-2018 (Punctaj =1)

Grannies on the Net: Comparative Case Study of Canada, Romania, Peru, Colombia, Spain, Italy, and Israel

(http://actproject.ca/act/grannies-on-the-net-2017/)

Sursa de finanțare Social Sciencies and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)

2017-2019 (Punctaj =1)

The Yellow Smiling Face”: Film and cross cultural refections (2017-2019) – finanțat de ACT project Canada

(http://actproject.ca/act/the-yellow-smiling-face-film-and-cross-cultural-reflection/)

Sursa de finanțare Social Sciencies and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)

2020-2022 (Punctaj =1)

Fighting Fake News: A New Literacies Approach for Young People.

Sursa de finațare: Fighting Fake News: A New Literacies Approach for Young People for Dynamics of Youth / EU Strategy Stimulation

Fund at Utrecht University

Conf. univ. dr. Loredana Ivan, 4.12.2020

Criteriu Definiţie criteriu Punctaj opținut

Loredana Ivan Standardul pentru prof. univ., CS I

C1 Punctajul pentru indicatorul I1 46.8 ≥ 10

C2 Numărul de articole care prezintă contribuţii originale, in extenso,

conform condiţiilor de la I2

82 ≥ 8

C3 Numărul de cărţi la care este unic autor sau prim autor 17 (1 carte

unic autor, 3 carti – prim

autor)

Cel puţin o carte la o editură cu prestigiu internaţional (A1) sau cel

puţin două cărţi publicate la edituri cu prestigiu recunoscut (A2)

C4 Suma punctajului pentru indicatorii I1-I8 260 ≥ 100

C5 Suma punctajului pentru indicatorii I9 160 ≥ 10

C6 Punctaj total (suma punctajului pentru indicatorii I1-I23) 548 ≥≥ 150

C7 Punctaj total (suma punctajului pentru indicatorii I1-I23), acumulat

după obţinerea titlului de doctor

518 ≥ 100

Semnătură conf. univ. dr. Loredana Ivan 4.12.2020