final city of winter haven - reiss civil · pdf filepolk county comprehensive water supply...

POLK COUNTY

COMPREHENSIVE WATER SUPPLY PLAN

FINAL

CITY OF WINTER HAVEN

Prepared For:

Polk County, FL

Prepared By:

Reiss Engineering

21 3rd st NW

Winter Haven, Florida 33881

863.268-8242

REI Project No. 8501

July 2009

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 City of Winter Haven................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background........................................................................................................................... 3

1.2.1 Inventory of Public Water Supply Facilities.................................................................. 3 1.2.1.1 Potable Water Infrastructure ................................................................................... 3 1.2.1.2 Reclaimed Water Infrastructure.............................................................................. 5

1.2.2 Population and Water Demand Projections ................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Future Water Supply Plans ............................................................................................ 8

1.3 Options for Additional Water Supply ................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 Local Sources................................................................................................................. 9

1.3.1.1 Conservation ......................................................................................................... 121.3.1.2 Reclaimed Water................................................................................................... 15 1.3.1.3 Surface Water........................................................................................................ 151.3.1.4 Groundwater ......................................................................................................... 16

1.3.2 Regional Sources ......................................................................................................... 201.3.2.1 Peace River ........................................................................................................... 211.3.2.2 Southeast Wellfield............................................................................................... 22

1.4 Implementation Considerations .......................................................................................... 22 1.5 Sample Implementation Plan .............................................................................................. 23

ii

TABLESTable 1-1: City of Winter Haven Potable Water Supply Facilities ................................................ 5 Table 1-2: City of Winter Haven Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Reuse.............................. 6 Table 1-3 SWFWMD: City of Winter Haven Population and Water Demand Projections ........... 7 Table 1-4: City of Winter Haven Wastewater and Reclaimed Flow Projections ........................... 8 Table 1-5: Local Water Supply Options ....................................................................................... 11 Table 1-6: Conservation Analysis Options ................................................................................... 13 Table 1-7: Conservation Analysis Sample Programs ................................................................... 14 Table 1-8: Agricultural Well Permitted and Pumped Quantities.................................................. 19 Table 1-9: Regional Water Supply Options.................................................................................. 21

iii

FIGURESFigure 1-1: Water Management Districts in Polk County .............................................................. 2 Figure 1-2: Winter Haven Service Area ......................................................................................... 4Figure 1-3: Supply and Demand Curve .......................................................................................... 7 Figure 1-4: Winter Haven Land Use Transition Map................................................................... 18 Figure 1-5: Conceptual Implementation Plan ............................................................................... 24

1

1.0 CITY OF WINTER HAVEN

1.1 Introduction

One of Polk County’s, and its local governments’ primary goals is to provide safe, reliable, and sustainable water, wastewater, and reclaimed water service to their existing and future customers. Historically, Polk County and the 17 local governments have provided potable water for both domestic use and irrigation, by drawing their water supply from Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA) groundwater wells. However, it is anticipated that public water demands in Polk County will increase significantly in the next 20 to 30 years. Furthermore, the Florida Legislature requires water supply planning where “traditional sources of water are not adequate for the planning period to supply water for all reasonable-beneficial uses and to sustain the water resources and related natural systems” (373.0361(1), Florida Statutes (F.S.)). This Statute is reinforced by the regional water supply plans published by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD).

In general, the WMDs have jointly concluded that the traditional groundwater sources in Central Florida are not sustainable at projected demand levels and, as such, will not be able to provide sufficient quantities to meet future demands. Therefore, there is an immediate need to investigate, develop and implement alternative and supplemental water supplies; as well as continue aggressive conservation measures and the use of reclaimed water.

“Alternative water supply sources are applicable within the SWUCA, and are defined as saltwater; brackish surface and ground water; surface water captured predominantly during wet-weather flows; sources made available through the addition of new storage capacity for surface or ground water; water that has been reclaimed after one or more public supply, municipal, industrial, commercial, or agricultural uses; the downstream augmentation of water bodies with reclaimed water; stormwater; and any other water supply source that is designated as non-traditional for a water supply planning region in the applicable regional water supply plan.” (SWFWMD Form, 2007)

“CFCA definitions allocate supplemental water supplies as surface water, stormwater, saltwater, and brackish groundwater if it can be developed without causing harmful impacts from cumulative groundwater withdrawals.” (SFWMD, et. al. 2007)

The WMDs are limiting groundwater allocation in the CFCA to a level equivalent to meet the projected 2013 demands, and thus are setting the time frame necessary to implement supplemental water supply projects to meet future demands. It is important to note for those portions of Polk County that fall within the SWUCA, previously established permitting rules supersede those developed for the current CFCA rules. A figure illustrating the SWUCA and CFCA within Polk County is shown in Figure 1-1.

2

Figure 1-1: Water Management Districts in Polk County

Based on the growing potable water demand, and the current surface water recovery strategies being implemented to recover MFLs within Polk County, the development of a plan for identifying and developing future water sources must address many constraints and overcome both technical and political challenges. Given these numerous and conflicting controls, the water supply planning effort will be complex, involving multiple elements ranging from water quality, water treatability, cost-effectiveness, and protection of the environment to inter-District coordination, cooperative regional water supply alternatives, and permitting challenges.

To meet these needs, Polk County, in a cooperative effort with both the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the South Florida Water Management District has been developing a comprehensive Water Supply Plan to identify and quantify viable additional public water supply sources, particularly alternative water supply sources, as needed to meet the future potable water and non-potable water needs of various public utility systems within Polk County. This process has included investigation of multiple water resources including ground water, surface water, reclaimed water, storm water and other means of providing adequate water services to future residents within Polk County. The process of exploring alternative water supplies was developed to recognize and to develop strategies to overcome the various technical, economic, environmental, jurisdictional and regulatory factors that may impact development of these new sources. This water supply planning effort first included the identification, quantification and confirmation of the types and quantities of new water supply that can be developed, and then addresses aligning the sources with prospective water supply partners. The final product is a list of water supply alternatives, and a comprehensive plan for the adequate and sustainable provision of water supply over the course of the planning period. The City of Winter Haven, as one of the 17 local governments, was specifically analyzed as part of the overall water supply

3

planning efforts. This section addresses general as well as specific options for which the City of Winter Haven could potentially implement as needed to meet their future water supply needs.

1.2 Background

The City of Winter Haven is located in the central portion of Polk County about 14 miles east of Lakeland and 44 miles east of Tampa with a total population of 71,262 residents (SWFWMD 2007 Public Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey). The City of Winter Haven is located within the Southwest Florida Water Management District’s boundary (SWFWMD) and the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA). Winter Haven is bordered by the Polk County Utilities (PCU): Central Regional Utilities Service Area (CRUSA), as well as the service areas of several local governments including Eagle Lake, Lake Wales, Dundee, Lake Hamilton, Haines City, Lake Alfred and Auburndale (refer to Figure 1-2).

1.2.1 Inventory of Public Water Supply Facilities

Winter Haven currently owns and operates potable water, wastewater and reclaimed water systems, which consist of eleven water treatment facilities, two wastewater treatment facilities and all associated collection, transmission and distribution infrastructure.

1.2.1.1 Potable Water Infrastructure

Winter Haven’s current potable water supply is traditional groundwater withdrawn from the Floridan aquifer through twenty two wells in nine wellfield sites, and treated at the eleven water treatment facilities (Table 1-1). Independent storage and high-service pumping facilities are utilized at Winter Haven’s water treatment plants.

Withdrawal from the Floridan aquifer is limited by the City of Winter Haven’s water use permit (WUP) issued by SWFWMD. The current water use permit, which allows Winter Haven to pump 12.326 MGD on an annual average daily demand (AADD) basis, and 16.759 MGD for the maximum month, will expire on July 27, 2009. According to the City of Winter Haven, water use can be characterized as 61.2% residential, 29.7% industrial/commercial, 2.9% non-residential recreational/aesthetic, 0.5% fire flow and other accounted for uses, with 5.7% of unaccounted for water use.

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

¬«9

¬«8

¬«7¬«6¬«5

¬«4

¬«3

¬«2

¬«1

¬«13

¬«12

¬«11

¬«10

FIGURE 1-2Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan

Winter Haven Service Area

²

LEGEND

Polk County LineWinter Haven Service Area

LEGEND! 1, 3rd Street WTP! 2, Inwood WTP! 3, Fairfax WTP! 4, Callen WTP! 5, Eloisewood WTP! 6, Garden Grove East WTP! 7, Summer Haven WTP

! 8, Cypresswood WTP! 9, Winterset WTP! 10, Winterset Gardens! 11, Ridge Vo-Tech WTP! 12, Winter Haven WWTP #3! 13, Winter Haven WWTP #2

5

Table 1-1: City of Winter Haven Potable Water Supply Facilities

Facility Name

Treatment Plant Design Capacity

(MGD)

MaximumMonth Demand

(MGD)

Average Daily Demand

(AADD-MGD) Fairfax WTP 11.438 5.387 3.704 3rd Street Water Plant 6.960 2.534 1.720 Winterset Gardens WTP 2.364 2.184 1.032 Winterset WTP 4.666 2.256 0.838 Inwood Water Plant 4.412 1.529 0.773 Garden Grove East WTP 1.319 1.521 0.697 Ridge VO Tech WTP 1.368 1.545 0.620 Callan WTP 0.782 0.820 0.565 Eloise Wood WTP 2.160 0.870 0.346 Cypresswood WTP 2.409 0.561 0.257 Summer Haven WTP 0.377 0.130 0.047 *2006 Water Treatment Facilities Data.

Winter Haven currently has an interconnect with the City of Lake Wales. The City recognizes that future interconnections will be necessary for water supplies in the case of development of regional water supplies. The City of Winter Haven has planned a future interconnection with the City of Auburndale. Other planned interconnections include County Road 559 interconnect with the Town of Dundee.

1.2.1.2 Reclaimed Water Infrastructure

The City of Winter Haven wastewater system consists of a collection system, lift stations and transmission mains, as well as two wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs), one of which provides treated wastewater effluent for reuse. The City’s wastewater treatment effluent disposal capacities include:

� 0.40 MGD Golf Course Irrigation � 0.20 MGD Sprayfield � 0.50 MGD Agricultural and Recreational/Aesthetic� 0.46 MGD Other Public Access Areas � 0.09 MGD Public Access Irrigation � 0.75 MGD Industrial Sprayfield � 5.00 MGD Surface Water

Winter Haven WWTF #2 provides 0.74 MGD of public access reuse to Tilden Grove, Rolling Hills Cemetery, Willowbrook and Lake Region Golf Courses, the Gates of Lake Region subdivision and additional areas. The reuse water provided by Winter Haven’s WWTF #2 offsets potable water demands. A summary of Winter Haven’s wastewater treatment facilities and reuse applications is shown in Table 1-2.

6

Table 1-2: City of Winter Haven Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Reuse

WWTFName

PermittedWWTF

Capacity(MGD)

ActualWWTF

Flow (MGD)

Disposal(MGD)

Reclaimed Water Utilization (MGD)

PublicSupplyOffset (MGD)

PrivateSupplyOffset (MGD)

Winter Haven

WWTF #3 5.00 3.85

3.85SurfaceWater

- 0.00 0.00

Winter Haven

WWTF #2 1.70 0.94 0.20

Sprayfield

0.32 Golf Course Irrigation, 0.24

Agricultural and Recreational/Aesthetic,

0.11 Other public access areas, 0.07

Public supply irrigation

0.10 0.37

Note: Information based on the SWFWMD Revisions to "FDEP Reuse Inventory" 2006

1.2.2 Population and Water Demand Projections

The City of Winter Haven currently has a population of approximately 71,262 within a 65 square mile service area. Despite the recent slowing of the housing market; the City anticipates an increase in population growth over the 2030 planning period. The projected population and water estimates are provided in Table 1-3. The SWFWMD has accepted an alternative method from the City of Winter Haven for calculating the City’s demands. The demands in Attachment1 reflect The City of Winter Haven's projections, seeing as the City provided SWFWMD with an acceptable methodology for future demands during the water use permit renewal evaluations and Central Florida Coordination Area Planning evaluations.

7

Table 1-3 SWFWMD: City of Winter Haven Population and Water Demand Projections

YearService Area Population

Permitted AADD Withdrawal (MGD)

Water Demand AADD

Projections(MGD)

Water Supply Deficit (-) or

Surplus (MGD)

2007 71,262 12.326 10.825 +1.5012010 85,135 12.326 12.600 -0.2742015 95,000 12.326 14.060 -1.7342020 105,676 12.326 15.640 -3.3142025 116,149 12.326 17.190 -4.8642030 127,660 12.326 18.894 -6.568

*Actual 2007 Service Area Population and actual Water Demand / Withdrawal as provided by the City of Winter Haven to the SWFWMD in the 2007 Public Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey. **SWFWMD Permitted AADD Withdrawal from 2010 to 2030. *** From SWFWMD Population & Water Demand Projections (Appendix C)

Winter Haven

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

Time (yr)

Ann

ual A

vera

ge D

eman

d (m

gd

Water Demand/Need Current Permitted Water Supply

2023 Water Supply Needs Exceed Estimated Water

Demands.

Figure 1-3: Supply and Demand Curve

Winter Haven’s average daily flow of raw water pumpage, which excludes imports, exports, and treatment losses, was 10.825 MGD in 2007 which leaves 1.501 MGD of additional flow. The City of Winter Haven is currently in the process to modifying its current water use permit for an

8

increase in water supply. Winter Haven’s current permitted capacity of 12.326 MGD and the projected 2030 water demands show Winter Haven is in a deficit of potable water supply of 6.568 MGD. Based on the population increase projections, the wastewater flow projections were calculated to predict future reclaimed water supplies available for potential public supply offsets (Table 1-4). The available wastewater flow for reuse per year is found by subtracting the reclaimed water utilization from the projected wastewater flows. The projected available reuse flows can be used to offset a utility’s future water supply needs, unless the flows have already been reserved. The City of Winter Haven has currently converted WWTF #3 into an advanced wastewater treatment facility. Potential reuse projects, future offsets, and reductions in future available wastewater flows have not been calculated. The facility may serve Winter Haven residents with reuse when further upgrades are completed. The City of Winter Haven also plans to connect additional customers to the WWTF #2 public access reuse system, providing customers with an additional 1.21 MGD of reuse. Planned water supply projects have been addressed for further capacity for the Winter Haven area within this plan.

Table 1-4: City of Winter Haven Wastewater and Reclaimed Flow Projections

Year Service Area Population

Projected Wastewater Flow (MGD)

Available Wastewater Flow for Reuse (MGD)

2006 69,954 4.79 4.05 2010 85,135 6.07 4.12 2015 95,000 6.89 4.94 2020 105,676 7.79 5.84 2025 116,149 8.67 6.72 2030 127,660 9.64 7.69

Note: The projected wastewater flow is found by multiplying the population by 84 gpd; 84 gpd estimate includes a variety of data including the following. A. The national average residential wastewater flow per person is 69.3 gpd (Handbook of Water Use and Conservation by Amy Vickers, 2001). B. Business and industry (ICI) wastewater inputs vary by locale. Note: The Available Wastewater Flow for Reuse is found by subtracting a utilities 2006 reclaimed water utilization (MGD) and planned reclaimed water projects (MGD) from the Projected Wastewater Flow (MGD) (SWFWMD, "2006 Northern SWUCA Reclaimed Information")Note: This assumes only future developments to be on served by centralized sewer (no sewer retrofits for septic)

1.2.3 Future Water Supply Plans

Winter Haven utilizes hydraulic modeling programs to estimate current conditions in the City’s water and wastewater distribution systems. The City also uses the model to predict future flow conditions. Water Treatment Facilities were evaluated based on the ability to provide needed capacity and pressure. Hydraulic modeling simulation scenarios were used to evaluate and verify recommendations for future improvements to the water and wastewater systems.

9

As a result of the hydraulic modeling analysis the City of Winter Haven plans to upgrade its piping system in several locations. Upgrades to the Fairfax, Inwood, Ridge Vo-Tech, Third Street and Cypresswoods water treatment plant high service pumping systems will occur in 2010. A plant expansion to the Winterset Gardens water treatment plant will occur in 2015. Additional upgrades to the Fairfax high service pumping system and Winterset high service pumping system WTP will occur in 2015. Winter Haven plans to design and construct three additional treatment plants by 2025 to sustain additional water supply needs. The City has also investigated the potential for a regional water treatment plant. The regional water treatment plant would use the wells from the Cypresswoods, Summer Haven, Garden Grove East and Orchid Springs for supply. The treatment facilities would be removed from service, in-turn saving operation and maintenance costs.

The City of Winter Haven plans for future expansions of the reuse system to occur in the southeastern areas of the City’s service area. The City currently has an ordinance requiring all new developments to install reclaimed water mains as part of their infrastructure within reclaim planning areas. Wastewater Treatment Plant #3 will be converted to an advanced wastewater treatment facility at the end of 2008, with reuse becoming available by 2011. The City expects an additional 2,500 residences to connect to reuse for irrigation.

The City will continue to evaluate the potential to mitigate new groundwater supplies from retired agricultural WUPs, as abandoned agricultural lands are scheduled to be developed as residential or commercial areas. This land use transition water supply option will be addressed in more detail in later sections of this plan.

The City is actively pursuing water conservation programs including providing water conservation retrofit kits with low flow showerheads, faucet aerators, leak detection tablets and other water conserving devices. The City also is enforcing building codes requiring low water use fixtures and developing Florida-friendly landscaping requirements. Other conservation programs include; rain and soil moisture sensor rebates, water conserving toilet rebates, pre-rinse spray valve replacements, education and public awareness, residential and commercial audit program, water CHAMP program, and reduction of unaccounted for water through installation of automatic meter readers. Winter Haven estimated that implementation of these efforts will save an estimated 1.6 million gallons of water on a daily basis, which represents 12% of the City’s projected new water needs through 2020. The City currently abides by the watering restrictions set forth by the SWFWMD and enforces these restrictions through the code enforcement/police department.

1.3 Options for Additional Water Supply

1.3.1 Local Sources

As noted above, the City of Winter Haven has a predicted water supply short-fall of approximately 6.568 MGD in the year 2030 (SWFWMD, March 2009). For the City of Winter Haven to meet their water supply needs, implementation of new water supply options must begin prior to the year in which a deficit occurs. The following paragraphs discuss the various water supply options available to the City of Winter Haven (Table 1-5). These options have been

10

identified as part of the 2009 PCCWSP and therefore do not include new permitted use for the UFA. The following water supply options will be discussed by category (conservation, reclaimed water, surface water, groundwater, regional water supply).

11

Table 1-5: Local Water Supply Options

City of Winter Haven

Current WUP Capacity 12.326 mgd Projected 2030 Demand1 18.894 mgd Deficit (in 2030) -6.568 mgd

Optional Categories

EstimatedQuantity

(mgd)

EstimatedRange(mgd)

EstimatedCosts $/ 1000 gal

Conservation2 2.598 mgd 0.56 - 8.5 $0.65 Reclaimed3 3.123 mgd 1.9 - 4.3 $1.50 Land Use Transition4 0.637 mgd 0.21 - 1.3 $0.74 Lower Floridan5 1.233 mgd 4.0 - -0.3 $2.59 Regional Sources6

Estimated Optional Categories Subtotal +7.590 mgd Surplus/Deficit with Optional Categories (2030) +1.022 mgd

(1) Projections provided by SWFWMD (March 2009) (2) The range of water demand reduction quantities for conservation were estimated as part of the 2009 Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan by utilizing a variety of programs with participation rates varying from 5% to 50%. The estimated water supply quantity, as shown in the table above, is based on an assumed overall participation rate of 23% (3) The range of water demand reduction quantities for reclaimed water were calculated using the SWFWMD Population Projections multiplied by 84 gpcd, estimated low range is 50% utilization of the estimated available wastewater for reclaimed water use, times, 50% efficiency. The upper range is 75% utilization of the available wastewater for reclaimed water use, times, 75% efficiency. The estimated water supply quantity, as shown in the table above, is based on the assumption that the projected increase in wastewater will be used to offset future potable water demands. The estimated quantity is the average between the estimated high and low range of utilization of available wastewater for reclaimed water use. The estimated quantity is based on 75% efficiency due to the SWFWMD's requirements for a 20 year permit. (4) The range of water supply quantities which may be available as a result of land use transitions was calculated using a range of 5% to 30% of the 10-year historical usage of agricultural, mining, industrial/commercial wells in the service area. The estimated quantity as shown in the table above is an assumed acreage conversion value of 15% which is based on historical trends. This land use transition process is only applicable for utilization of water from the Upper Floridan aquifer if mitigation is needed due to predicted adverse impacts. The estimated quantity and range include the unincorporated areas within the Polk County region. (5) The range of water supply quantities for Lower Floridan Blending was calculated using a range of 5% to 20% of the current permitted capacity and assumed Lower Floridan Aquifer quality. The estimated water supply quantity, as shown in the table above, was assumed to be 10% of the current permitted supply quantity for the service area. (6) Specific water supply quantities for regional sources have not been determined at this time. Refer to the text in subsection 5.4 related to regional water supply sources for overall project quantity estimates.

12

1.3.1.1 Conservation

Projected growth and associated increased potable water demands have led to growing concerns about the sustainable use of treated groundwater resources in Florida, and have driven communities to focus on the potential and importance of conservation for water savings. Current efforts by a number of local governments pertaining to water conservation have generally centered on educating potable water customers on the efficient water use through various conservation methods or measures. While education–based water conservation initiatives are an extremely important element of any conservation plan, quantifying the potable water savings directly due to public outreach efforts can be challenging. As such, communities must move well beyond education programs to implement measures which will cost-effectively improve reductions in water demands.

The ability to quantify conserved water is critical when developing a comprehensive regional water supply plan. The objective of this portion of the Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan was to identify potential, quantifiable impacts on potable water consumption for various water conservation methods if applied to the specific local governments located within Polk County.

Prior to the detailed evaluation of potential conservation measures, several relevant studies were examined in detail, including:

� Southwest Florida Water Management District’s - 2006 Regional Water Supply Plan

� Tampa Bay Water - Compilation of Members’ Five Year Conservation Plans

� 2005 Heartland Water Alliance – Phase I; II & III Water Supply Plan

� 2007 Polk County Local Governments Utilities – Phase I & II County Wide Water Supply Plan.

These studies aided the Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan Team in developing a “long list” of conservation methods for further evaluation and consideration (2009 PCCWSP Appendix A). The long list consisted of many conservation approaches utilized by a wide range of utilities. From the long list of conservation items, several projects were selected to undergo more detailed analyses based on permittability, additional benefit, implementation time, cost effectiveness, water savings and the ability to quantify future savings.

Potential conservation measures were evaluated for individual water savings potential and cost effectiveness, with the majority of projects implemented on a voluntary basis. The voluntary nature of these measures was addressed through the inclusion of individual participation factors, which were customized to the communities and the specific conservation program. From this evaluation, specific conservation measures for each local government’s utility service area were selected for the detailed analysis. Through the efforts of this study, the estimated quantity of water savings for the City of Winter Haven could potentially be as much as 2.598 MGD, based on an assumed average participation rate of 23 percent (SWFWMD, 2009). Apparently, if higher participation rates are achieved, additional water savings can be realized.

Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan Winter Haven-Options

100% 50% 23% 5% 100% 50% 23% 5% 100% 50% 23% 5% 100% 50% 23% 5%Plumbing Retrofit ProgramA $30 4,380 5 20 27,067 13,534 6,225 1,353 0.880 0.440 0.202 0.044 $830,010 $424,005 $201,162 $52,601 $0.26 $0.26 $0.28 $0.29ULV Toilets-SFA $100 9,470 20 20 22,646 11,323 5,209 1,132 1.592 0.796 0.366 0.080 $2,282,640 $1,150,320 $535,267 $125,232 $0.40 $0.40 $0.41 $0.42ULV Toilets-MFA $100 9,709 20 20 4,421 2,210 1,017 221 0.319 0.159 0.073 0.016 $454,080 $233,040 $113,078 $33,104 $0.39 $0.40 $0.45 $0.48ULV Toilets-Non ResA $100 13,140 20 20 3,520 1,760 810 176 0.343 0.172 0.079 0.017 $364,032 $188,016 $92,367 $28,602 $0.29 $0.30 $0.34 $0.37Dual-Flush Toilets-SFA $175 13,688 20 20 22,646 11,323 5,209 1,132 2.301 1.151 0.529 0.115 $3,981,120 $1,999,560 $925,918 $210,156 $0.48 $0.48 $0.49 $0.49Dual-Flush Toilets-MFA $175 25,550 20 20 4,421 2,210 1,017 221 0.839 0.419 0.193 0.042 $785,640 $398,820 $189,337 $49,682 $0.26 $0.26 $0.28 $0.29Dual-Flush Toilets-Non ResA $175 21,827 20 20 3,520 1,760 810 176 0.570 0.285 0.131 0.029 $628,056 $320,028 $153,093 $41,803 $0.30 $0.31 $0.34 $0.35Ultra Low Volume UrinalsB $100 25,550 20 20 1,137 568 261 57 0.080 0.040 0.018 0.004 $125,677 $67,839 $34,146 $11,684 $0.42 $0.44 $0.54 $0.61Waterless UrinalsB $200 42,705 20 20 1,137 568 261 57 0.133 0.067 0.031 0.007 $239,354 $124,677 $60,291 $17,368 $0.49 $0.50 $0.56 $0.60High Efficiency Clothes Washer-SFC $125 5,950 20 20 34,867 17,433 8,019 1,743 0.568 0.284 0.131 0.028 $4,376,324 $2,197,162 $1,016,815 $229,916 $2.14 $2.15 $2.18 $2.20High EfficiencyClothes Washer-MFC $125 3,942 20 20 6,806 3,403 1,565 340 0.074 0.037 0.017 0.004 $868,788 $437,394 $207,081 $53,539 $3.26 $3.27 $3.49 $3.64High EfficiencyClothes Washer-Non Res C $900 560,640 20 20 142 71 33 7 0.218 0.109 0.050 0.011 $138,552 $69,776 $35,337 $12,378 $0.17 $0.17 $0.21 $0.24ICI Spray Valve ReplacementD $75 98,550 5 20 317 159 73 16 0.086 0.043 0.020 0.004 $34,775 $22,888 $13,468 $7,189 $0.10 $0.11 $0.21 $0.27ICI AssessmentsE $4,000 842,420 20 20 5,358 2,679 1,232 268 12.366 6.183 2.844 0.618 $21,449,060 $10,727,530 $4,940,544 $1,082,553 $0.48 $0.48 $0.49 $0.49Rain Sensor Shut-off DevicesF $75 10,700 5 20 33,423 16,712 7,687 1,671 0.980 0.490 0.225 0.049 $2,524,725 $1,271,363 $590,947 $137,336 $0.72 $0.72 $0.74 $0.75Soil Moisture Shut-off DevicesF $125 10,700 5 20 33,423 16,712 7,687 1,671 0.980 0.490 0.225 0.049 $4,195,875 $2,106,938 $975,311 $220,894 $1.19 $1.19 $1.21 $1.22Outdoor Water Conservation-ResG $300 77,380 20 20 30,155 15,077 6,936 1,508 6.393 3.196 1.470 0.320 $9,064,429 $4,541,215 $2,095,079 $464,321 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40Outdoor Water Conservation-Non Res G $300 156,220 20 20 1,500 750 345 75 0.642 0.321 0.148 0.032 $462,052 $236,026 $111,512 $28,503 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.22Large Landscape AssessmentH $900 156,220 10 20 44 22 10 2 0.019 0.009 0.004 0.001 $45,449 $25,725 $15,073 $7,972 $0.63 $0.67 $1.15 $1.46

6Equipment Fee, Research and Development, and training is based on "Development of Water Conservation Options for Non-Agricultural Water Users ", Southwest Florida Water Management District & Ayres Associates, August 2000;Each project was calculated seperatley by amoritizing at 8% interest for the life of the program (the total cost at a rated capacity used the total capital costs and savings amoritized over the average years implemented for all projects)

5Potable Flow Savings is calculated by multiplying # of participating accounts by the water savings rate per year

No. accounts targeted4 Potable Flow Savings (mgd)5 Capital Cost ($)6 Cost at Rated Capacity ($/Kgal)No. of years implemented

3Conservation Program

Watersavings per

year per account2

Rebate/Purchasecost per account1

Life of Measure2

1Rebate/Purchase cost per account may vary on the aggressivness of the program, costs per account are based on research and typical rebate amounts2Water savings per year per account from SWFWMD 2006 Regional Water Supply Plan, The Potable Water Conservation BMP's for Tampa Bay - Sept '04 (TBW), The Handbook of Water Conservation by Amy Vickers - Waterplow Press3No of years based on a typical water supply planning period of 20 years and the life of measure from manufacturer's recommendations4No. accounts targeted based on variable participation rates of 100% 50% & 5%; Estimations based on GIS parcel and housing information from the Polk County Property Appraiser; US Census Bureau; SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey (A) # of Accounts for Toilet Rebates and plumbing retrofit kits is based upon pre-1995 homes found using the Polk County Property Appraisers information and the 2007 SWFWMD Public Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey

(D) # of Accounts for ICI spray valve replacements found from Polk County Property Appraisers parcel information and 2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; (C) # of Accounts for High Efficiency Clothes Washers found using US Census bureau information;2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; Increase in population based on 2009 SWFWMD Population Estimations (B) # of Accounts for Waterless and ULV Urinals is based on the total number of commercial facilities based on the 2007 SWFWMD Public Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey

(H) # of Accounts for Large Landscape Customers from the Agricultural Section of the 2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey (G) # of Accounts for Outdoor Water Conservation SF, MF, and Non-Res from the 2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; Increase in population based on 2009 SWFWMD Population Estimations;Percentage irrigating found using Polk County Property Appraiser Information and the Florida Water Rates Evaluation of Single-Family Homes - July 13, (F) # of Accounts for Rain Sensor and Soil Moisture Sensor based on the total number of accounts for SF, MF, and Non-Res from the 2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; Increase in population based on 2009 SWFWMD Population Estimations; Percentage irrigating found using Polk County Property Appraiser Information and the Florida Water (E) # of Accounts for ICI Assessment based on total number of Industrial Commercial and Institutional facilities in a service area from the 2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; Increase in population based on 2009 SWFWMD Population Estimations

R:\Projects\8501-Polk County Water Supply\Study-Report\Final_Report\Conservation\Appendices\Appendix B\Winter Haven Conservation Rebate Calculator

Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan Winter Haven-Programs

100% 50% 23% 5% 100% 50% 23% 5% 100% 50% 23% 5% 100% 50% 23% 5%Plumbing Retrofit ProgramA $30 4,380 5 20 27,067 13,534 6,225 1,353 0.880 0.440 0.202 0.044 $830,010 $424,005 $201,162 $52,601 $0.26 $0.26 $0.28 $0.29ULV Toilets-SFA $100 9,470 20 20 22,646 11,323 5,209 1,132 1.592 0.796 0.366 0.080 $2,282,640 $1,150,320 $535,267 $125,232 $0.40 $0.40 $0.41 $0.42ULV Toilets-MFA $100 9,709 20 20 4,421 2,210 1,017 221 0.319 0.159 0.073 0.016 $454,080 $233,040 $113,078 $33,104 $0.39 $0.40 $0.45 $0.48ULV Toilets-Non ResA $100 13,140 20 20 3,520 1,760 810 176 0.343 0.172 0.079 0.017 $364,032 $188,016 $92,367 $28,602 $0.29 $0.30 $0.34 $0.37Ultra Low Volume UrinalsB $100 25,550 20 20 1,137 568 261 57 0.080 0.040 0.018 0.004 $125,677 $67,839 $34,146 $11,684 $0.42 $0.44 $0.54 $0.61High Efficiency Clothes Washer-SFC $125 5,950 20 20 34,867 17,433 8,019 1,743 0.568 0.284 0.131 0.028 $4,376,324 $2,197,162 $1,016,815 $229,916 $2.14 $2.15 $2.18 $2.20High EfficiencyClothes Washer-MFC $125 3,942 20 20 6,806 3,403 1,565 340 0.074 0.037 0.017 0.004 $868,788 $437,394 $207,081 $53,539 $3.26 $3.27 $3.49 $3.64High EfficiencyClothes Washer-Non Res C $900 560,640 20 20 142 71 33 7 0.218 0.109 0.050 0.011 $138,552 $69,776 $35,337 $12,378 $0.17 $0.17 $0.21 $0.24ICI Spray Valve ReplacementD $75 98,550 5 20 317 159 73 16 0.086 0.043 0.020 0.004 $34,775 $22,888 $13,468 $7,189 $0.10 $0.11 $0.21 $0.27Rain Sensor Shut-off DevicesF $75 10,700 5 20 33,423 16,712 7,687 1,671 0.980 0.490 0.225 0.049 $2,524,725 $1,271,363 $590,947 $137,336 $0.72 $0.72 $0.74 $0.75Outdoor Water Conservation-ResG $300 77,380 20 20 30,155 15,077 6,936 1,508 6.393 3.196 1.470 0.320 $9,064,429 $4,541,215 $2,095,079 $464,321 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40Outdoor Water Conservation-Non Res G $300 156,220 20 20 1,500 750 345 75 0.642 0.321 0.148 0.032 $462,052 $236,026 $111,512 $28,503 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.22

TOTAL= 11.294 5.647 2.598 0.565 $20,697,000 $10,416,000 $4,846,000 $1,132,000 $0.53 $0.53 $0.55 $0.56

(G) # of Accounts for Outdoor Water Conservation SF, MF, and Non-Res from the 2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; Increase in population based on 2009 SWFWMD Population Estimations;Percentage irrigating found using Polk County Property Appraiser Information and the Florida Water Rates Evaluation of Single-Family Homes - July 13, (F) # of Accounts for Rain Sensor and Soil Moisture Sensor based on the total number of accounts for SF, MF, and Non-Res from the 2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; Increase in population based on 2009 SWFWMD Population Estimations; Percentage irrigating found using Polk County Property Appraiser Information and the Florida Water

(A) # of Accounts for Toilet Rebates and plumbing retrofit kits is based upon pre-1995 homes found using the Polk County Property Appraisers information and the 2007 SWFWMD Public Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey

(D) # of Accounts for ICI spray valve replacements found from Polk County Property Appraisers parcel information and 2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; (C) # of Accounts for High Efficiency Clothes Washers found using US Census bureau information;2007 SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey; Increase in population based on 2009 SWFWMD Population Estimations (B) # of Accounts for Waterless and ULV Urinals is based on the total number of commercial facilities based on the 2007 SWFWMD Public Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey

1Rebate/Purchase cost per account may vary on the aggressivness of the program, costs per account are based on research and typical rebate amounts2Water savings per year per account from SWFWMD 2006 Regional Water Supply Plan, The Potable Water Conservation BMP's for Tampa Bay - Sept '04 (TBW), The Handbook of Water Conservation by Amy Vickers - Waterplow Press3No of years based on a typical water supply planning period of 20 years and the life of measure from manufacturer's recommendations4No. accounts targeted based on variable participation rates of 100% 50% & 5%; Estimations based on GIS parcel and housing information from the Polk County Property Appraiser; US Census Bureau; SWFWMD Public Water Supply Per Capita Water Use Survey

Conservation Program

Watersavings per

year per account2

Rebate/Purchasecost per account1

Life of Measure2

6Equipment Fee, Research and Development, and training is based on "Development of Water Conservation Options for Non-Agricultural Water Users ", Southwest Florida Water Management District & Ayres Associates, August 2000;Each project was calculated seperatley by amoritizing at 8% interest for the life of the program (the total cost at a rated capacity used the total capital costs and savings amoritized over the average years implemented for all projects)

5Potable Flow Savings is calculated by multiplying # of participating accounts by the water savings rate per year

No. accounts targeted4 Potable Flow Savings (mgd)5 Capital Cost ($)6 Cost at Rated Capacity ($/Kgal)No. of years implemented

3

R:\Projects\8501-Polk County Water Supply\Study-Report\Final_Report\Conservation\Appendices\Appendix B\Winter Haven Conservation Rebate Calculator

15

1.3.1.2 Reclaimed Water

Reclaimed water produced at the wastewater treatment plant(s) within the City of Winter Haven could be used as an alternative source of water supply to offset existing or future demands, which would otherwise utilize potable water. These uses could include, but are not limited to:

� Public Access Areas & Landscape Irrigation

� Agricultural Irrigation

� Ground Water Recharge & Indirect Potable Reuse

� Industrial

� Toilet Flushing

� Fire Protection

� Wetlands

The SWFWMD is currently investigating the benefits of setting a standard policy and procedure for issuing incentives to Utilities using reclaimed water in an environmentally beneficial way. Incentives could include: increased water use permit quantities, extended permit length, credits towards per capita demand offsets, or other potential incentives. The calculated increase in wastewater effluent flow rate from 2010 to 2030 was based on; (1) the 2009 SWFWMD Population and Demand estimates and; (2) the local government’s current wastewater flow rate. For planning purposes, the estimated increase in future wastewater flow for the City of Winter Haven is estimated to be approximately 3.123 MGD. This quantity will be used to estimate the amount to offset future potable water demands, but only in a case of use as reclaimed water for irrigation.

1.3.1.3 Surface Water

Located within Polk County are a vast number of water bodies, including 554 lakes, 3 rivers (the Peace, the Alafia and the Kissimmee Rivers), and numerous other creeks and streams. For the purposes of this plan, stormwater was also categorized as surface water due to the nature in which stormwater could be captured and stored for potential use as an alternative water supply. Stormwater captured for use as a drinking water supply has not typically been practiced in Florida, or even elsewhere in the United States. However, stormwater capture has been widely used as a water supply source for localized irrigation or other non-potable water uses. The use of stormwater as an alternative supply for the purposes of this PCCWSP was limited to offsetting potable-quality water uses by supplementation with available stormwater for irrigation. Additionally, due to the limited water quantity available, creeks and streams were not investigated individually, but their contributions with the larger rivers that they supply were taken into consideration.

16

The Peace River and Alafia River were investigated in detail in the 2009 PCCWSP for potential quantities of water available for public water supply within the regional supply category. The Kissimmee Basin Modeling and Operations Study team is currently conducting similar investigations for potential supplies available from the Kissimmee River. Due to the high costs and location of these projects it is likely these surface water supplies will be implemented on a regional basis.

When considering the use of surface water as an alternative source of supply, a variety of rules and regulations must be taken into strong consideration during the evaluation process. One of the most important regulatory constraints on surface water withdrawals in Florida is the concept of minimum flows and levels (MFL), which were evaluated thoroughly in the 2009 PCCWSP. As a result of MFL regulatory requirements, water withdrawal from these rivers and lakes will only be permitted if sufficient evidence is provided that MFLs are maintained.

1.3.1.4 Groundwater

Two types of groundwater projects that the City of Winter Haven could potentially utilize for water supply include (1) the use of retired wells to mitigate impacts of proposed increased ground water withdrawals (commonly referred to as Land Use Transition) and (2) withdrawing water from the Lower Floridan Aquifer.

Land Use Transitions SWFWMD has set a precedent to allow the use of offset quantities available resulting from the reduction of impacts through the mitigation process, the SFWMD has historically not approved such permitting attempts. Furthermore, the use of agricultural wells to supply water to meet potable water demands has limitations based on historical water usage, location, and documentation supporting reasonable demands.

The SWFWMD has released draft documents regarding the issues surrounding land use transitions. The first draft “Guidance Memorandum for Water Use Changes Associated with Land Use Changes” was released in August 2008. This document serves as a guideline for the mitigation of adverse impacts on water resources, existing legal users, and off-site land uses. This document was reviewed by staff from Polk County, the local governments, and the PCCWSP Project Team. The SWFWMD reviewed their comments and released a revised version of the Memo titled “Mitigation of Water Withdrawal Impacts Through Permanent Retirement of Used Permitted Quantities” in early 2009 (PCCWSP Appendix C).

There is still a considerable amount of land in the County’s and local governments’ service areas that are currently zoned as agricultural or industrial, which also contain wells used for irrigation or other purposes. In the future, many of these areas could be rezoned and redeveloped from agricultural/industrial/mining to commercial and/or residential. Once the existing land use is discontinued, the wells could potentially be available to provide offset quantities through the mitigation/net benefit process. However,

17

this is only applicable if the well permits are being retired. These non-public supply wells are drawing source water from the UFA which provides relatively high quality source water for public supply.

If the historical usage, location of the public water supply well, and documentation supporting a reasonable demand meet the requirements, it is possible that new wells of similar permitted quantity could be constructed or a portion of the withdrawal permitted quantity could be transferred to other existing Floridan wells. As a second option, if all permitting, utilization, and efficiency criteria are met, the SWFWMD will consider on a case by case basis the opportunity, to use these agricultural/industrial/mining wells to supplement the non-potable water demand. This is only applicable in situations where the reclaimed water supplies from the wastewater/reuse augmentation plants are not sufficient to meet the irrigation demands during dry periods on a temporary or intermittent basis (PCCWSP Appendix C)

The PCCWSP Project team has compiled the agricultural/industrial/recreational water use permits for the City of Winter Haven. All of the wells, permitted quantities, and yearly withdrawals within the City of Winter Haven boundaries have been identified (Figure 1-4). Utilizing this information, scenarios were developed to estimate potential quantities for transition to public use. The total permitted quantities and the 10-Year average pumping in this area are 8.025 MGD and 4.249 MGD respectively (Table 1-8).

It is important to note that land use transition projects involve using retired wells to mitigate impacts of proposed increased ground water withdrawals for public supply and not to seek out agricultural or mining areas for procurement with the agenda of capturing wells. The purpose of this task was to identify the maximum offset quantities available in each area based on historical trends. It is important to note that there are no guarantees that any of these parcels with existing wells will be available for mitigation purposes within the planning period. This exercise was performed to give the City of Winter Haven data estimates to use in their planning efforts to capture opportunities when they become available.

027A

124IC

018A

139R

135R

131A

004A

001R

018A

115A

050A

103R

033A

081A

040A

142A

147A

099R

106A

140A

136A

072A

048A

054R

009A

002A

130A

089A

134A

106A

121A

063A

120A

049A

127A

097R

012A

080A

112A

039IC

102A

100A

008A

107A

138A

129A

141A

062A

048A

114A044A

066A

137A

125A

151IC

122A

006A

008A

111A

150A

053A

082IC

098A

116IC

085A

086A

029A

119A

153A

087A

118A

028A

083A

021A

094A091A

092A

108R

015A

036R

055A

071A

043A

149A

117A

060A

017R

132A

073A

016A

127A

074A

148A

095A

061R

082IC

024A

014A

113R

133A

075A

133A

146A

068A

057A

144A

109A

128A

067A

130A

069A

145A

010A

012A

045IC

030A

079A

130A

059A

005A

073A

050A

123A

078A

077A

152IC

064A

088A

034A

070A 110A

013A

096A

038R

003A

010A

082IC

099R

023R

084A

129A

037R

090A

032A

065A

011A

007A

093A

076A

039IC

025A

019R

104A

041IC

101A

051A

105A

088A

056A

154R

058A

031A

020R

022A

126R

035A

144A

013A

026A

046R

088A

143A

042A

156A

031A

047R

052A

Winter HavenWinter Haven

Lake WalesLake Wales

DundeeDundee

Haines CityHaines City

Lake AlfredLake Alfred

WaverlyWaverly

WahnetaWahneta

InwoodInwood

Lake HamiltonLake Hamilton

Jan Phyl VillageJan Phyl Village

AuburndaleAuburndale

Cypress GardensCypress Gardens

Eagle LakeEagle Lake

��27

��17

��92

��17

��27

��700

��540

��655

��544

��542

��559

��549

��555

��542

��555

POLK

OSCEOLA

PASCO

HILLSBOROUGH

ORANGELAKESUMTER

HARDEEMANATEE

�City of Winter Haven

Permitted Annual AveragePolk County Supplemental Water Supply Plan

Polk County, Florida

Source

Projection: Stateplane FloridaDatum: NAD 1983Zone: WestUnits: Feet

Aerial Photographs: Aerials Express, 2006

City of Winter Haven Service Area

P:\PROJECTS\WUP Maps - Polk County\Winter Haven\MXD\Polk County Utilities_Winter_Haven_Permits_A_I_R.mxd

0 1 20.5Miles

Less Than 100,000

100,000 to 499,999

500,000 to 999,999

1,000,000 to 2,999,999

Greater Than 3,000,000

Gallons Per Day

A

IC

R

Agricultural

Industrial and Commercial

Recreation/Aesthetic

Number, Permit Number, Permit Owner

001R, 012832, LAKE ASHTON DEVELOPMENT GROUP II

002A, 010549, AUGUSTUS Z DAVIS

003A, 010527, EUGENE YON

004A, 001087, TARPON BREEZE HOA

005A, 007216, KILKENNY GROVES INC

006A, 012476, CLAUDE E MANN INC

007A, 007569, THOMAS C & LOUISE HARRINGTON

008A, 002063, IVEY GROVES LTD

009A, 000819, ROBERT WASHINGTON

010A, 007574, WILLIAM G ROE & CO INC

011A, 000317, HIGHLAND CASSIDY LLC

012A, 007199, SOUTH ORANGE PROPERTIES LLP

013A, 001005, POLK NURSERY COMPANY INC

014A, 007791, W E GREEN & SONS INC

015A, 001752, BAXTER GROVES

016A, 003469, BOB PAUL INC

017R, 012165, POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

018A, 007610, G W MANN JR

019R, 010651, CITY OF WINTER HAVEN-PUBLIC

020R, 009220, ABBEY LANE APARTMENTS

021A, 001934, WEBB GROVES INC

022A, 008283, ROBINSON CALLEN TRUSTEE

023R, 007539, PARK LAKE MASTER ASSOCIATION

024A, 011097, MARTHA LUDIE CONLEY

025A, 000860, WINTER HAVEN NURSERIES

026A, 008791, CHARLES J AND NANCY YOUNG III

027A, 006468, ROBERT G STOKES & STOKES GROVES

028A, 002064, BENTLEY DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC

029A, 001592, WALTER MANLEY

030A, 000304, ERNEST BRETON JR & PHILLIP

031A, 012168, BRUCE COMBEE

032A, 012521, JACK M BERRY INC

033A, 004377, H R BAXTER & SONS ENTERPRISES

034A, 002520, ROBERT G STOKES

035A, 001732, PEGGY P DAVIS

036R, 003643, LAKE SMART COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS

037R, 000509, TURNER REED DEVELOPMENT LLC

038R, 001165, POLK CO SCHOOL BOARD

039IC, 002023, PHOENIX INDUSTRIES LLC

040A, 007570, WILLARD E ROE & WM G ROE & CO

041IC, 006861, WINTER HAVEN HOSPITAL INC

042A, 005208, WILLIAM S & REGINA J M DUNDORE

043A, 000792, MARJORIE H ROE

044A, 003360, J REH INC

045IC, 000260, IMPERIAL BRANDS INC

046R, 010235, HELEN LATRELL MARSHALL

047R, 010828, NEW LIFE WORSHIPPING CENTER INC

048A, 000668, CITRUS ENTERPRISES INC

049A, 001197, ARK INDUSTRIES INC

050A, 002147, THELMA C RALEY INC

051A, 000402, ANTHONY T & FRANCES A ROSA

052A, 005211, S MARK & IRENE L CRISSMAN

053A, 003309, ERNEST M SMITH REVOCABLE TRUST

054R, 005932, THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES

055A, 009126, THOMAS H WOOD

056A, 012365, BROAD FOREST LP & BRADCO FARMS

057A, 002053, BRENT AND BETSY MONK

058A, 007140, MAY GROVES INC

059A, 000400, MRS ROBERT J ESTES

060A, 001226, S JARVIS & SHELIA P HART

061R, 011855, LAKE DEER APTS LTD PARTNERSHIP

062A, 011311, GILBERT BOWEN

063A, 007252, GAYE G SCALES & JUDY G HOFFMAN

064A, 003876, A HOFFMAN & G SCALES & J WILDER

065A, 007170, EUGENE STUART PAUL LIMITED


067A, 006689, HARVEY B SNIVELY III

068A, 001748, SIGNATURE HOMES OF CENTRAL FL

069A, 001801, ROBERT C TURNER

070A, 001699, INMAN GROVES INC

071A, 012034, N B & M LAVERNE WILLOUGHBY


073A, 009564, J & B CITRUS

074A, 001178, HAZEL ROHDE

075A, 002447, JACK PINES SHIRLEE J PINES

076A, 009162, DIANA J & WILLIE C MOSS CO

077A, 002085, MARY ESTELLE & KENNETH EARL

078A, 002087, BROOKS B REGISTER III AND

079A, 000672, ARNOLD J SPANJERS

080A, 001668, SUBHAS RAMROOP

081A, 002113, WYLIE L & WYLIE R HINTON

082IC, 007469, HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS SE INC

083A, 003443, M S & C F P

084A, 013137, GAIL F MURPHY

085A, 000383, CAY HOLDINGS LLC

086A, 004155, CHARLES E & PAMELA H WATSON

087A, 000926, WILLIAM E HILLARD


089A, 002464, BOWEN BROTHERS INC

090A, 001506, JOHN S LANGFORD

091A, 006740, SMITH & SLATER GROVE INC

092A, 006383, C & C GROVES

093A, 008513, JUANITA F VOIGHT

094A, 011170, ROCKER FARMS INC

095A, 009141, TRIPLE A PROPERTIES INC

096A, 013071, S J BARRANCO

097R, 000679, LAKE BESS GOLF CLUB INC

098A, 000110, ROGERS GROVES INC

099R, 007489, LAND SOUTH ADVENTURE LLC

100A, 001225, ALTURAS TWIN LAKES GROVE LLC

101A, 006984, CHARLOTTE OIE

102A, 002965, BRADCO INC

103R, 012636, LAKE REGION YACHT & COUNTRY CLUB

104A, 007257, FLORIDA DEPT OF AG & CONSUMER

105A, 007171, SCOTT D RAILEY

106A, 000384, JOHN G WOOD & ASSOCIATES INC

107A, 003283, JOHN G WOOD

108R, 002462, P&K USA INC

109A, 002150, MORRISON PARTNERSHIP

110A, 009359, DUNDEE PROPERTIES INC

111A, 001935, BTS

112A, 006038, TUAN A & TRANGDAI T NGUYEN

113R, 012548, WINTER HAVEN CORP

114A, 004267, JOHN A EDWARDS & DORTHY DORAN

115A, 001252, LYNCHBURG GROVES

116IC, 013175, INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO


118A, 000632, JACK WATKINS

119A, 009787, INTERLACHEN GROVES INC

120A, 006870, FLORIDA CITRUS PROPERTIES

121A, 007864, THOMAS V & SUSAN J DAVIDSON

122A, 009615, CASSIDY PROPERTIES INC

123A, 002781, FRANCES R WILSON

124IC, 011177, CITY OF WINTER HAVEN


126R, 012607, DUNSON HARVESTING INC

127A, 006642, KENNETH L WETHERINGTON SR &

128A, 000060, LELAND K YOUNG

129A, 007029, LUTHER D-CAROL SAPP & MATTHEW

130A, 006750, MARK W SHABLA TRUSTEE LAKE

131A, 004674, LD CREWS

132A, 000224, MICHAEL ALLEN & JOY CHRISTINE



135R, 008553, CYPRESSWOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB

136A, 002543, JEFF STOKES

137A, 003765, JIM NORRIS VENRICK

138A, 001459, W A ALFORD & DONNIE G ALFORD

139R, 012172, LAKE ASHTON DEVELOP GROUP LLC

140A, 010112, CITY OF WINTER HAVEN-WASTEWATER

141A, 002446, PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF GOD

142A, 000118, PATRICK GROVES INC



145A, 000549, TOBIAS S & TRIPPI MCGLINN

146A, 007501, LESTER DONLEY AND SONS GROVES

147A, 007176, BJ FULTON & JOHN S LANGFORD


149A, 002090, POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD


151IC, 002538, APAC-SOUTHEAST INC

152IC, 012929, FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES INC

153A, 001355, MARK SHABLA

154R, 012582, CIRCLE 3 INVESTMENTS INC

155R, 001364, ROBERT HERNANDEZ

156A, 010938, FRED B KLOTE

027A

124IC

018A

139R

135R

131A

004A

001R

018A

115A

050A

103R

033A

081A

040A

142A

147A

099R

106A

140A

136A

072A

048A

054R

009A

002A

130A

089A

134A

106A

121A

063A

120A

049A

127A

097R

012A

080A

112A

039IC

102A

100A

008A

107A

138A

129A

141A

062A

048A

114A044A

066A

137A

125A

151IC

122A

006A

008A

111A

150A

053A

082IC

098A

116IC

085A

086A

029A

119A

153A

087A

118A

028A

083A

021A

094A091A

092A

108R

015A

036R

055A

071A

043A

149A

117A

060A

017R

132A

073A

016A

127A

074A

148A

095A

061R

082IC

024A

014A

113R

133A

075A

133A

146A

068A

057A

144A

109A

128A

067A

130A

069A

145A

010A

012A

045IC

030A

079A

130A

059A

005A

073A

050A

123A

078A

077A

152IC

064A

088A

034A

070A 110A

013A

096A

038R

003A

010A

082IC

099R

023R

084A

129A

037R

090A

032A

065A

011A

007A

093A

076A

039IC

025A

019R

104A

041IC

101A

051A

105A

088A

056A

154R

058A

031A

020R

022A

126R

035A

144A

013A

026A

046R

088A

143A

042A

156A

031A

047R

052A



DundeeDundee



WaverlyWaverly

WahnetaWahneta

InwoodInwood






��27

��17

��92

��17

��27

��700

��540

��655

��544

��542

��559

��549

��555

��542

��555

POLK

OSCEOLA

PASCO

HILLSBOROUGH

ORANGELAKESUMTER

HARDEEMANATEE


10 Year Average (1998-2007)Polk County Supplemental Water Supply Plan


Source




P:\PROJECTS\WUP Maps - Polk County\Winter Haven\MXD\Polk County Utilities_Winter_Haven_Permits_6_Year.mxd

0 1 20.5Miles

Less Than 100,000

100,000 to 499,999

500,000 to 999,999

1,000,000 to 2,999,999


Gallons Per Day

A

IC

R

Agricultural



No Data Available



















018A, 007610, G W MANN JR


























044A, 003360, J REH INC





























073A, 009564, J & B CITRUS










083A, 003443, M S & C F P









092A, 006383, C & C GROVES
















108R, 002462, P&K USA INC



111A, 001935, BTS




















131A, 004674, LD CREWS


























027A

124IC

018A

139R

135R

131A

004A

001R

018A

115A

050A

103R

033A

081A

040A

142A

147A

099R

106A

140A

136A

072A

048A

054R

009A

002A

130A

089A

134A

106A

121A

063A

120A

049A

127A

097R

012A

080A

112A

039IC

102A

100A

008A

107A

138A

129A

141A

062A

048A

114A044A

066A

137A

125A

151IC

122A

006A

008A

111A

150A

053A

082IC

098A

116IC

085A

086A

029A

119A

153A

087A

118A

028A

083A

021A

094A091A

092A

108R

015A

036R

055A

071A

043A

149A

117A

060A

017R

132A

073A

016A

127A

074A

148A

095A

061R

082IC

024A

014A

113R

133A

075A

133A

146A

068A

057A

144A

109A

128A

067A

130A

069A

145A

010A

012A

045IC

030A

079A

130A

059A

005A

073A

050A

123A

078A

077A

152IC

064A

088A

034A

070A 110A

013A

096A

038R

003A

010A

082IC

099R

023R

084A

129A

037R

090A

032A

065A

011A

007A

093A

076A

039IC

025A

019R

104A

041IC

101A

051A

105A

088A

056A

154R

058A

031A

020R

022A

126R

035A

144A

013A

026A

046R

088A

143A

042A

156A

031A

047R

052A



DundeeDundee



WaverlyWaverly

WahnetaWahneta

InwoodInwood






��27

��17

��92

��17

��27

��700

��540

��655

��544

��542

��559

��549

��555

��542

��555

POLK

OSCEOLA

PASCO

HILLSBOROUGH

ORANGELAKESUMTER

HARDEEMANATEE


6 Year Average (2002-2007)Polk County Supplemental Water Supply Plan


Source




P:\PROJECTS\WUP Maps - Polk County\Winter Haven\MXD\Polk County Utilities_Winter_Haven_Permits_6_Year.mxd

0 1 20.5Miles

Less Than 100,000

100,000 to 499,999

500,000 to 999,999

1,000,000 to 2,999,999


Gallons Per Day

A

IC

R

Agricultural



No Data Available



















018A, 007610, G W MANN JR


























044A, 003360, J REH INC





























073A, 009564, J & B CITRUS










083A, 003443, M S & C F P









092A, 006383, C & C GROVES
















108R, 002462, P&K USA INC



111A, 001935, BTS




















131A, 004674, LD CREWS


























Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan 7/31/2009

Key Number Permit Number Permittee Name Permitted Annual Average 6 Year Average 10 Year Average001R 012832 LAKE ASHTON DEVELOPMENT GROUP II 219,500 N/A N/A002A 010549 AUGUSTUS Z DAVIS 45,200 N/A N/A003A 010527 EUGENE YON 18,300 N/A N/A004A 001087 TARPON BREEZE HOA 120,900 16,388 107,365005A 007216 KILKENNY GROVES INC 14,000 N/A N/A006A 012476 CLAUDE E MANN INC 20,000 N/A N/A007A 007569 THOMAS C & LOUISE HARRINGTON 9,600 N/A N/A008A 002063 IVEY GROVES LTD 74,700 9,899 82,646009A 000819 ROBERT WASHINGTON 86,200 80,307 160,427010A 007574 WILLIAM G ROE & CO INC 30,600 N/A N/A011A 000317 HIGHLAND CASSIDY LLC 13,900 N/A N/A012A 007199 SOUTH ORANGE PROPERTIES LLP 117,700 68,548 137,901013A 001005 POLK NURSERY COMPANY INC 99,600 83,881 177,480014A 007791 W E GREEN & SONS INC 124,800 87,874 169,610015A 001752 BAXTER GROVES 30,500 N/A N/A016A 003469 BOB PAUL INC 15,600 N/A N/A017R 012165 POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 1,800 N/A N/A018A 007610 G W MANN JR 34,400 N/A N/A019R 010651 CITY OF WINTER HAVEN-PUBLIC 17,700 N/A N/A020R 009220 ABBEY LANE APARTMENTS 6,500 N/A N/A021A 001934 WEBB GROVES INC 32,300 N/A N/A022A 008283 ROBINSON CALLEN TRUSTEE 5,100 N/A N/A023R 007539 PARK LAKE MASTER ASSOCIATION 25,600 N/A N/A024A 011097 MARTHA LUDIE CONLEY 9,700 N/A N/A025A 000860 WINTER HAVEN NURSERIES 38,100 N/A N/A026A 008791 CHARLES J AND NANCY YOUNG III 5,900 N/A N/A027A 006468 ROBERT G STOKES & STOKES GROVES 339,500 184,551 343,307028A 002064 BENTLEY DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC 33,400 N/A N/A029A 001592 WALTER MANLEY 29,000 N/A N/A030A 000304 ERNEST BRETON JR & PHILLIP 47,900 N/A N/A031A 012168 BRUCE COMBEE 12,500 N/A N/A032A 012521 JACK M BERRY INC 12,100 N/A N/A033A 004377 H R BAXTER & SONS ENTERPRISES 104,800 71,597 166,297034A 002520 ROBERT G STOKES 18,400 N/A N/A035A 001732 PEGGY P DAVIS 10,200 N/A N/A036R 003643 LAKE SMART COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS 37,200 N/A N/A037R 000509 TURNER REED DEVELOPMENT LLC 9,200 N/A N/A038R 001165 POLK CO SCHOOL BOARD 23,700 N/A N/A039IC 002023 PHOENIX INDUSTRIES LLC 118,400 47,937 66,654040A 007570 WILLARD E ROE & WM G ROE & CO 153,700 164,877 223,693041IC 006861 WINTER HAVEN HOSPITAL INC 7,500 0 3,977042A 005208 WILLIAM S & REGINA J M DUNDORE 6,200 N/A N/A043A 000792 MARJORIE H ROE 22,000 N/A N/A044A 003360 J REH INC 2,600 N/A N/A045IC 000260 IMPERIAL BRANDS INC 112,000 0 6,180046R 010235 HELEN LATRELL MARSHALL 2,500 N/A N/A047R 010828 NEW LIFE WORSHIPPING CENTER INC 3,400 N/A N/A048A 000668 CITRUS ENTERPRISES INC 32,300 N/A N/A049A 001197 ARK INDUSTRIES INC 49,500 2,218 2,218050A 002147 THELMA C RALEY INC 290,600 228,196 228,196051A 000402 ANTHONY T & FRANCES A ROSA 8,200 N/A N/A052A 005211 S MARK & IRENE L CRISSMAN 2,000 N/A N/A053A 003309 ERNEST M SMITH REVOCABLE TRUST 48,400 N/A N/A054R 005932 THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES 34,800 N/A N/A055A 009126 THOMAS H WOOD 21,200 N/A N/A056A 012365 BROAD FOREST LP & BRADCO FARMS 31,700 N/A N/A057A 002053 BRENT AND BETSY MONK 35,800 N/A N/A058A 007140 MAY GROVES INC 9,700 N/A N/A059A 000400 MRS ROBERT J ESTES 23,300 N/A N/A060A 001226 S JARVIS & SHELIA P HART 19,300 N/A N/A061R 011855 LAKE DEER APTS LTD PARTNERSHIP 9,600 N/A N/A062A 011311 GILBERT BOWEN 42,700 N/A N/A063A 007252 GAYE G SCALES & JUDY G HOFFMAN 47,800 N/A N/A064A 003876 A HOFFMAN & G SCALES & J WILDER 13,000 N/A N/A065A 007170 EUGENE STUART PAUL LIMITED 13,900 N/A N/A066A 000320 HIGHLAND CASSIDY LLC 58,800 N/A N/A067A 006689 HARVEY B SNIVELY III 45,800 N/A N/A068A 001748 SIGNATURE HOMES OF CENTRAL FL 26,100 N/A N/A069A 001801 ROBERT C TURNER 22,400 N/A N/A070A 001699 INMAN GROVES INC 15,100 N/A N/A071A 012034 N B & M LAVERNE WILLOUGHBY 29,000 N/A N/A072A 001426 GILBERT BOWEN 87,000 77,292 127,920073A 009564 J & B CITRUS 45,900 N/A N/A074A 001178 HAZEL ROHDE 21,600 N/A N/A075A 002447 JACK PINES SHIRLEE J PINES 4,800 N/A N/A076A 009162 DIANA J & WILLIE C MOSS CO 7,100 N/A N/A077A 002085 MARY ESTELLE & KENNETH EARL 19,000 N/A N/A078A 002087 BROOKS B REGISTER III AND 18,300 N/A N/A079A 000672 ARNOLD J SPANJERS 6,100 N/A N/A080A 001668 SUBHAS RAMROOP 42,900 N/A N/A081A 002113 WYLIE L & WYLIE R HINTON 156,000 116,049 149,319082IC 007469 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS SE INC 96,000 N/A N/A083A 003443 M S & C F P 29,500 N/A N/A084A 013137 GAIL F MURPHY 15,400 N/A N/A085A 000383 CAY HOLDINGS LLC 65,700 N/A N/A

Winter Haven

Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan 7/31/2009

Key Number Permit Number Permittee Name Permitted Annual Average 6 Year Average 10 Year AverageWinter Haven

086A 004155 CHARLES E & PAMELA H WATSON 38,600 N/A N/A087A 000926 WILLIAM E HILLARD 43,000 N/A N/A088A 001004 POLK NURSERY COMPANY INC 316,900 144,727 237,456089A 002464 BOWEN BROTHERS INC 62,700 36,172 121,510090A 001506 JOHN S LANGFORD 14,500 N/A N/A091A 006740 SMITH & SLATER GROVE INC 34,700 N/A N/A092A 006383 C & C GROVES 29,800 N/A N/A093A 008513 JUANITA F VOIGHT 18,300 N/A N/A094A 011170 ROCKER FARMS INC 39,300 N/A N/A095A 009141 TRIPLE A PROPERTIES INC 12,600 N/A N/A096A 013071 S J BARRANCO 18,100 N/A N/A097R 000679 LAKE BESS GOLF CLUB INC 62,700 N/A N/A098A 000110 ROGERS GROVES INC 38,700 N/A N/A099R 007489 LAND SOUTH ADVENTURE LLC 318,400 203,178 549,719100A 001225 ALTURAS TWIN LAKES GROVE LLC 58,000 N/A N/A101A 006984 CHARLOTTE OIE 6,100 N/A N/A102A 002965 BRADCO INC 45,500 N/A N/A103R 012636 LAKE REGION YACHT & COUNTRY CLUB 175,600 64,556 64,556104A 007257 FLORIDA DEPT OF AG & CONSUMER 7,600 N/A N/A105A 007171 SCOTT D RAILEY 7,900 N/A N/A106A 000384 JOHN G WOOD & ASSOCIATES INC 290,100 198,136 293,275107A 003283 JOHN G WOOD 63,800 N/A N/A108R 002462 P&K USA INC 32,400 N/A N/A109A 002150 MORRISON PARTNERSHIP 23,400 N/A N/A110A 009359 DUNDEE PROPERTIES INC 17,600 N/A N/A111A 001935 BTS 41,600 0 44,828112A 006038 TUAN A & TRANGDAI T NGUYEN 67,700 N/A N/A113R 012548 WINTER HAVEN CORP 22,700 N/A N/A114A 004267 JOHN A EDWARDS & DORTHY DORAN 49,100 N/A N/A115A 001252 LYNCHBURG GROVES 242,800 162,119 162,119116IC 013175 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO 10,600 N/A N/A117A 001331 ROBERT G STOKES 18,600 N/A N/A118A 000632 JACK WATKINS 21,500 N/A N/A119A 009787 INTERLACHEN GROVES INC 22,900 N/A N/A120A 006870 FLORIDA CITRUS PROPERTIES 72,500 N/A N/A121A 007864 THOMAS V & SUSAN J DAVIDSON 57,300 26,969 74,320122A 009615 CASSIDY PROPERTIES INC 45,300 N/A N/A123A 002781 FRANCES R WILSON 10,900 N/A N/A124IC 011177 CITY OF WINTER HAVEN 13,500 N/A N/A125A 004132 JACK M BERRY INC 41,600 N/A N/A126R 012607 DUNSON HARVESTING INC 400 N/A N/A127A 006642 KENNETH L WETHERINGTON SR & 58,900 N/A N/A128A 000060 LELAND K YOUNG 19,400 N/A N/A129A 007029 LUTHER D-CAROL SAPP & MATTHEW 25,800 N/A N/A130A 006750 MARK W SHABLA TRUSTEE LAKE 82,000 0 0131A 004674 LD CREWS 60,600 N/A N/A132A 000224 MICHAEL ALLEN & JOY CHRISTINE 51,700 N/A N/A133A 002148 THELMA C RALEY INC 12,300 N/A N/A134A 006940 ALTURAS TWIN LAKES GROVE LLC 96,600 66,563 130,825135R 008553 CYPRESSWOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB 280,300 144,038 233,316136A 002543 JEFF STOKES 32,200 N/A N/A137A 003765 JIM NORRIS VENRICK 57,300 N/A N/A138A 001459 W A ALFORD & DONNIE G ALFORD 35,700 0 0139R 012172 LAKE ASHTON DEVELOP GROUP LLC 320,900 N/A N/A140A 010112 CITY OF WINTER HAVEN-WASTEWATER 52,800 N/A N/A141A 002446 PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF GOD 30,300 N/A N/A142A 000118 PATRICK GROVES INC 58,000 N/A N/A143A 000142 FLORIDA DEPT OF AG & CONSUMER 2,700 N/A N/A144A 003144 BOWEN BROTHERS INC 31,900 N/A N/A145A 000549 TOBIAS S & TRIPPI MCGLINN 26,700 N/A N/A146A 007501 LESTER DONLEY AND SONS GROVES 13,200 N/A N/A147A 007176 BJ FULTON & JOHN S LANGFORD 124,600 112,334 163,780148A 002084 BROOKS B REGISTER III AND 16,600 N/A N/A149A 002090 POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 25,200 N/A N/A150A 003554 JOHN S LANGFORD 53,700 N/A N/A151IC 002538 APAC-SOUTHEAST INC 11,000 12,676 20,547152IC 012929 FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES INC 29,000 N/A N/A153A 001355 MARK SHABLA 21,700 N/A N/A154R 012582 CIRCLE 3 INVESTMENTS INC 2,000 N/A N/A155R 001364 ROBERT HERNANDEZ 200 N/A N/A156A 010938 FRED B KLOTE 5,600 N/A N/A

Total= 8,024,900 2,411,082 4,249,441

20

Lower Floridan Aquifer Due to limited knowledge of the LFA, it is not certain how much water may be available from this source. Concerns regarding the LFA revolve around the thickness of the confining unit. If the thickness is not sufficient, withdrawals from the LFA could lead to drawdown in the UFA and wetlands within the radius of influence. Other concerns include the potential degradation of water quality.

It is assumed for the purposes of this PCCWSP that quantifying the yield or the capacity of a well drilled into the LFA will be similar to the process for quantifying groundwater from a well drilled into the UFA. It is also assumed that the individual local governments will be required to perform sufficient aquifer performance testing (APTs) to prove the desired supply quantity will have no impacts to surface waters and wetlands, as well as determine if the water quality is within the criteria range to be classified as an “alternative water supply,” particularly in the areas of the County that is governed by only the CFCA regulations.

The City of Winter Haven has the choice to utilize 100 percent LFA water and treat as needed, or blend a lower quantity of LFA water supply with the existing withdrawals from the UFA at their existing water treatment plants. The potential yield for blending projects assumes that a local government will expand treatment capacities to pump their full permitted capacity. Assuming that the LFA water has a TDS value of 1,500 mg/L or a 1,000 mg/L chloride level, a one to ten (1:10) blending ratio with UFA water can be utilized to increase water supply. This ratio was selected because it would not be necessary to change the treatment processes based on the blended Lower Floridan water quality given the deciding factors are total dissolved solids and chlorides. This helps minimize costs and avoid issues associated with concentrate disposal. The City of Winter Haven can potentially gain an additional 1.233 MGD of supply through groundwater blending projects.

1.3.2 Regional Sources

Potential partnerships among governments to bulk purchase water supply from various sources outside the County were also investigated as options. In Section 2.0, three potential groups were identified for potential future shared-use partnerships; (1) Tampa Bay Water; (2) the STOPR Group consisting of the City of St. Cloud, the Toho Water Authority, Orange County Utilities, Polk County Utilities, and the Reedy Creek Improvement District; and (3) The Peace River Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority (PRMRWSA). Obtaining water supply from each of these potential partnerships would involve purchase of water from the group or co-funding projects to obtain water supplies from regions outside the County.

Bulk supply projects provide an opportunity for Polk County and its 17 local governments to increase their water supply quantities by obtaining water from outside of the County. Similar to the previous groundwater examples, after the project has met the necessary regulatory requirements a bulk supply would increase the permitted quantity,

21

thus shifting the time in which the permitted quantity equals or exceeds the demand further in the future (Table 1-9).

Table 1-9: Regional Water Supply Options

Regional Sources

Optional Categories1 EstimatedQuantity (mgd) Estimated Costs2-4

$/ 1000 gal Tampa Bay Water 10 $6.50 Peace River/Land Use Transition 11 $9.80 SE Wellfield 15 $4.90 STOPR 5 -----

(1) The estimated quantity were selected as the highest value from the range of quantities (identified as part of the 2009 PCCWSP (Section 2)) to make the projects cost effective. (2) The estimated costs are comparable to the Tampa Bay Water's Long Term Water Supply Plan (July 2008). The Tampa Water Project is assumed to be the Alafia River Surface Water Expansion outlined in Appendix A, 2009 PCCWSP.(3)The estimated costs for the Peace River/Land Use Transition Project were based on typical surface and groundwater treatment facilities (Section 4) and 40 miles of piping and valves. (4)The estimated costs were based on Lower Floridan aquifer water treatment (Section 4) and 40 miles of piping and valves.

As stated previously, the City of Winter Haven has the potential to participate in all of the regional projects. Since the locations of some projects relative to the Winter Haven could cause them to be cost prohibitive, the closest regional project for the City of Winter Haven will be discussed briefly in the following paragraphs. More detailed project descriptions can be found in Sections 2 and 4 of the 2009 PCCWSP.

1.3.2.1 Peace River

This project is a combined surface water project and land use transition project. It would involve the construction of a surface water treatment facility and associated reservoir, as well as incorporate a land use transition well through the development of a regional partnership to supply Polk County and the local governments with blended surface water from the Peace River and Upper Floridan aquifer groundwater. The Peace River Evaluation Report determined that combined flows from the Peace River at Ft. Meade and Bowlegs Creek could yield approximately 5 MGD of water supply. This surface water combined with the Southern Land Use Transition wells would potentially provide 5 to 11 MGD of water supply to the Polk County region. It is anticipated that this supply would be divided up among several local governments.

22

1.3.2.2 Southeast Wellfield

Investigations into the productivity and water quality of the Lower Floridan Aquifer are currently being conducted in the Southeast portion of Polk County by Polk County Utilities and other Central Florida entities. For example, a LFA production well was recently drilled in the northeastern part of Polk County. It is assumed that the water quality in the Lower Floridan Aquifer has a lower quality with respect to chlorides, TDS and sulfates as compared to the Upper Floridan. These assumptions may not always hold correct, as the initial water quality data from the well in the northeast part of Polk County had a quality that was deemed not of the chloride and TDS limits to be considered an alternative water source. Currently, for the Lower Floridan Aquifer to be considered an alternative water supply (AWS) source, the chloride levels need to be at least 1,000 mg/L or the TDS at least 1,500 mg/L. Although the northeast well did not meet AWS water quality limits there is evidence to suggest that a LFA wellfield in the southeastern portion of the County might qualify as an AWS source.

For the purposes of this planning level evaluation, the Lower Floridan Aquifer is assumed to be a potential source for alternative water supply. Past groundwater modeling studies have been performed in the southeastern portion of the County, indicating a water supply of 10 to 25 MGD may be available. For the purposes of this document, a median value of 15 MGD is used for the analysis. As pointed out previously, Polk County Utilities is currently evaluating this potential source for regional water supply.

1.4 Implementation Considerations

Section 4.0 of the 2009 PCCWSP describes the potential water quality issues, planning, permitting, design, civil infrastructure and associated economics, which will need to be considered when developing the various water supply options to meet individual local demands. In addition to the project infrastructure descriptions, this section of the report also provides a brief summary of the qualitative impacts related to the implementation of each specific type of project, such as regulatory considerations. This Section also includes a quantitative analysis related to the capital project costs for each water supply option. Planning-level annual operating costs were also developed, in order to calculate a cost index in dollars per 1,000 gallons ($/1k gal), as a means of comparing each option for a 30-Year planning period on an equivalent basis. The information in this section is formatted so that it can be applied to any local governments considering the utilization of any category type project as part of their future water supply planning process.

In essence, the evaluation was performed to determine and describe; (1) what is the process associated with the development of an alternative water supply project (2) what is the effort involved in transferring the new water supply to the various municipal entities (based on their specific demand deficit quantities) and; (3) what are the associated issues related to the implementation of an alternative water in conjunction with the existing UFA groundwater for a potable water system. This analysis compares the list of alternative water supply projects to the current water supply deficits for the 17 local governments and six County service areas as a means to initiate the formation of the

23

individual implementation plans (outlined in Section 5) for meeting future public water supply demands.

Early on, it became apparent that the secondary driving force behind the viability of each type of water supply project would be water quality and the associated level of treatment that would be required to implement a new supply project. The difference of constituents between the raw water quality of any particular source and the desired finished water quality determines the type of water treatment requirements. The type of water treatment process required directly impacts both capital and annual operating costs to the participating local governments. This is due in large part to the fact that the raw water quality for some of the various options is known to vary significantly as compared to the existing traditional treatment requirements for most local governments. Finished water quality, for public supply, must (at a minimum) meet EPA’s and FDEP’s primary and secondary drinking water standards. Thus, the discussion in this section begins with the advantages and disadvantage of various treatment considerations applicable to all categories of water supply projects, and is followed by a detailed discussion on the treatment considerations for the individual specific categories.

To maintain consistency, the categories will be discussed in the same order as Section 2.0 (surface water, groundwater, reclaimed water, bulk supply partners, and conservation). The evaluation of alternative water supplies included a planning level determination of the following:

� Rules and Regulations

� Finished Water Quality Goals

� Primary Treatment Criteria

� Storage Considerations

� Water Treatment Processes

� Finished Water Blending Considerations

� Transmission and Pumping Options

1.5 Sample Implementation Plan

The 2009 PCCWSP provides the City of Winter Haven options that have the potential, when implemented, to meet their future water supply demands through 2030. A conceptual implementation plan has been preliminarily developed for the City of Winter Haven to utilize in their on-going planning efforts (refer to Figure 1-5). This sample implementation plan is only meant to provide the City of Winter Haven with a list of options and the information on how these alternative water supply options could be implemented in the future to meet the water supply needs. It is not the intent of this plan to infer and dictate a specific procedure to follow, but simply to supply the City of Winter Haven with a list of options and information necessary to create an implementation plan of their own to meet future water supply needs. For additional project options and information, please refer to the 2009 PCCWSP.

24

Figure 1-5: Conceptual Implementation Plan

Implement/Continue a Conservation Program

Implement/Continue Reclaimed Water Projects: Offset

Demand or Increase Water

Annual Evaluation of Available Water Supply Options and Demand

Projections

Is the projected

deficit more than

10 yrs away?

NO

Implement/Continue Lower Floridan Aquifer

Source

Implement/Continue Regional Water Source

Begin/Continue Planning for a Lower

Floridan Aquifer Source

Begin/Continue Planning for a Regional Water Supply Source

Implement/Evaluate Additional Groundwater

Supplies and LUT if Mitigation is necessary

YES

•2009 Polk County Comprehensive Water Supply Plan

Is the projected

deficit more than

10 yrs away?

NO

Is the projected

deficit more than

20 yrs away?

Optimize Existing Groundwater Supplies

YES

NO

Implement/Continue a Conservation Program

Implement/Continue Reclaimed Water Projects: Offset

Demand or Increase Water

YESNOOR

AND/OR

AND/OR

YES

START

Is the projected

deficit more than

15 yrs away?

NO

25

ATTACHMENT 1

Example for Polk Water Supply PlanPublic Supply Population and Demand ProjectionsSouthwest Florida Water Management DistrictDraft 2009 Update

AMENDED / ABBREVIATED TABLE 4-35A. POLK COUNTY MUNICIPAL POPULATION ESTIMATES AND WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS

(1) (2) (3) (5) DEFICIT SURPLUS TOTALEstimated PERMITTED PERMITTED PERMITTED PERMITTED

ESTIMATED PERCENT 2005 (4) (MGD) AAD LESS LESS LESS2005 OF 2005 WITHDRAWAL 2001-2005 (MGD) 2030 2030 2030POP POP (MGD) 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 AVG GPCD 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 CURRENT (MGD) (MGD) (MGD)

(6) City of Bartow (341) 20,047 3.75 3.208 23,868 32,272 39,901 47,991 57,721 160 3.819 5.164 6.384 7.679 9.235 7.900 -1.335 -1.335City of Fort Meade (645) 6,942 1.30 0.757 7,929 8,693 9,397 10,017 10,587 109 0.864 0.948 1.024 1.092 1.154 1.014 -0.140 -0.140Town of Lake Hamilton (2332) 2,408 0.45 0.344 2,750 3,015 3,260 3,475 3,672 143 0.393 0.431 0.466 0.497 0.525 0.484 -0.041 -0.041

(6) City of Winter Haven (4607) 65,766 12.31 9.733 85,135 95,000 105,676 116,149 127,660 148 12.600 14.060 15.640 17.190 18.894 12.326 -6.568 -6.568(6) City of Lake Wales (4658) 20,140 3.77 2.779 22,892 26,106 29,898 32,943 35,725 138 3.159 3.603 4.126 4.546 4.930 3.821 -1.109 -1.109

City of Lakeland (4912) 166,345 31.13 23.787 189,998 208,306 225,167 240,029 253,690 143 27.170 29.788 32.199 34.324 36.278 35.030 -1.248 -1.248(6)(7) Polk County / NERUSA & Oak Hill (6509,SFWMD) 60,366 11.30 8.092 93,397 109,813 126,229 143,990 164,233 134 12.520 14.708 16.907 19.287 22.000 13.950 -8.050 -8.050

(6) City of Davenport (5750) 3,978 0.74 0.597 5,297 6,042 6,875 7,866 9,286 150 0.795 0.906 1.031 1.180 1.393 1.002 -0.391 -0.391(6) City of Frostproof (5870) 2,900 0.54 0.363 5,581 12,554 14,632 18,664 23,805 125 0.698 1.569 1.829 2.333 2.976 1.338 -1.638 -1.638(6) Town of Dundee (5893) 3,728 0.70 0.488 4,859 5,527 5,948 6,435 6,963 131 0.637 0.724 0.779 0.843 0.912 1.831 0.919 0.919

City of Mulberry (6124) 4,878 0.91 0.502 5,572 6,108 6,603 7,039 7,439 103 0.574 0.629 0.680 0.725 0.766 1.120 0.354 0.354(6) Polk County / NWRUSA (6505) 23,100 4.32 3.026 44,121 48,313 49,672 51,355 53,838 131 5.780 6.329 6.507 6.728 7.053 5.085 -1.968 -1.968(6) Polk County / SWRUSA (6506) 29,447 5.51 3.534 41,812 48,560 53,542 57,220 59,075 120 5.017 5.827 6.425 6.866 7.089 4.948 -2.141 -2.141

Polk County / CRUSA (6507) 12,230 2.29 1.480 13,969 15,315 16,555 17,647 18,652 121 1.690 1.853 2.003 2.135 2.257 2.271 0.014 0.014(6) Polk County / SERUSA (6508) 5,900 1.10 0.732 6,638 11,567 13,644 14,266 14,915 124 0.823 1.434 1.692 1.769 1.849 1.367 -0.482 -0.482(6) City of Lake Alfred (6624) 5,584 1.04 0.709 8,262 8,816 9,546 10,289 10,910 127 1.049 1.120 1.212 1.307 1.386 1.381 -0.005 -0.005(6) City of Eagle Lake (6920) 2,502 0.47 0.283 7,113 8,065 9,047 9,407 9,597 113 0.804 0.911 1.022 1.063 1.084 0.947 -0.137 -0.137(6) City of Auburndale (7119) 26,129 4.89 4.782 31,210 33,623 37,134 39,512 41,831 183 5.711 6.153 6.796 7.231 7.655 7.036 -0.619 -0.619

Polk County / ERUSA (8054) 4,584 0.86 0.550 5,236 5,740 6,205 6,615 6,991 120 0.628 0.689 0.745 0.794 0.839 1.065 0.226 0.226(6) City of Polk City (8468) 2,200 0.41 0.262 8,302 10,255 11,593 12,226 12,437 119 0.988 1.220 1.380 1.455 1.480 1.187 -0.293 -0.293(6) City of Haines City (8522) 22,650 4.24 3.715 29,134 33,018 37,658 42,184 44,858 164 4.778 5.415 6.176 6.918 7.357 5.712 -1.645 -1.645(6) Village of Highland Park (9807) 261 0.103 261 261 261 261 261 394 0.103 0.103 0.103 0.103 0.103 0.092 -0.011 -0.011

Municipal Total 492,085 69.825 643,336 736,970 818,442 895,579 974,147 90.600 103.584 115.126 126.064 137.215 110.907 -27.820 1.513 -26.308

Notes:MGD = million gallons per day(1) From SWFWMD, 2005 Estimated Water Use Report, Table A-1 (June 2007). 2005 values listed may vary if permittees that did not originally submit a survey in 2005 provided valid 2005 population data during the Polk County Water Supply Plan review.(2) Estimated using average 2001-2005 GPCD, as provided in Table A-1 of the District's reports titled Estimated Water Use, 2001-2005 .(3) Projected County Population, BEBR adjusted, multiplied by percent of the 2005 Population.

(5) Computed as projected population multiplied by 2001-2005 average per capita water use.

(7) The population and demand projections shown include those for the Polk County Oak Hill SFWMD permitted service area, the two systems are interconnected. The SFWMD Oak Hill Permit is for 3.031 mgd and the SWFWMD NERUSA permit is for 10.919 mgd.

PROJECTED WATER DEMANDSPROJECTED POPULATION

(6) The City of Bartow, City of Winter Haven, City of Lake Wales, City of Davenport, City of Frostproof, Town of Dundee, City of Lake Alfred, City of Eagle Lake, City of Auburndale, City of Polk City, City of Haines City, Village of Highland Park and Polk County NERUSA, NWRUSA, SWRUSA and SERUSA supplied acceptable methodology (GIS methods) for future population and demand projections during either the water use permit renewal evaluations, Central Florida Coordination Area Planning evaluations, and/or Polk County Water Supply Planning evaluations. Utilization of the District's GIS Associates population model was incorporated and projections are within the BEBR medium - high total county range.

Monday, April 20, 2009

(4) For utilities with at least 0.1 mgd average annual withdrawal (i.e., the utilities individually listed in the table), year 2001-2005 average estimated per capita water use rates, as provided in Table A-1 of the District's reports titled Estimated Water Use, 2001-2005 were used to project demands.

Winter Haven

City of Winter Haven # 4607 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Historical Gross Use (mgd) 9.016 9.653 10.046 10.815 10.848 10.667 11.734 9.058 9.241 8.782 9.108 9.536 10.482 10.095 9.450 10.575 9.585 9.410 9.211 9.461 9.788 10.710 10.497

Projected Demand (mgd) 9.733 10.307 10.880 11.453 12.600 14.060 15.640 17.190 18.894

Permitted Quantities (mgd) 11.232 11.332 11.634 10.600 10.565

Current Permitted Quantity (mgd) 12.326

Projected Demand (mgd) Source is 2008 updated Water Supply Assessment / Public Supply Population and Demand Projections (06/30/08).Permitted Quantities Source is District's Regulatory Database System (Queried 08/26/08).

* Includes historical use and permitted quantities from # 4279 (Winter Haven / Garden Grove). Transferred / combined on 12/02/04.* Includes historical use and permitted quantities from # 6104 (Kinsmen Ent / Orange Manor / G Grove). Transferred / combined on 03/07/94.* Includes historical use and permitted quantities from # 6085 (Brookhaven Village). Transferred / combined on 02/01/87.

Demand projections shown for 2006, 2007, and 2008 were linearly interpolated from the 2005 and 2010 projections shown.

Demand projections for 2005 will not match the Historical Gross Use listed, as the projections for 2005 were calculated using the 2001-2005 five year average per capita for consistency throughout the planning horizon.

Historical Gross Use (mgd) Source is various years (1985-2006) Published Estimated Water Use Reports (available online at http://www4.swfwmd.state.fl.us/dbtw-wpd/mywebqbe/librarytst3b.htm) and Internal Draft 2007 Table A-1 (data gathered from submitted 2007 Public Supply Permittee Survey Reports and Regulatory Database System AAD pumpage).Gross Use is calculated as withdrawals + imports - exports - treatment losses.

The City of Bartow, City of Winter Haven, City of Lake Wales, City of Davenport, City of Frostproof, Town of Dundee, City of Lake Alfred, City of Eagle Lake, City of Auburndale, City of Polk City, City of Haines City, Village of Highland Park and Polk County NERUSA, NWRUSA, SWRUSA and SERUSA supplied acceptable methodology (GIS methods) for future population and demand projections during either the water use permit renewal evaluations, Central Florida Coordination Area Planning evaluations, and/or Polk County Water Supply Planning evaluations. Utilization of the District's GIS Associates population model was incorporated and projections are within the BEBR medium - high total county range.

Historical Use / Projected Demand / Permitted Quantities Analysis

8.000

10.000

12.000

14.000

16.000

18.000

20.000

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030Year

Perm

itted

AA

D (m

gd)

8.000

10.000

12.000

14.000

16.000

18.000

20.000

His

toric

al U

se &

Fut

ure

Dem

and

(mgd

)

Historical Permitted Current Permitted Historical Use Projected Demand

SWFWMD 2008 TBA

final city of winter haven - reiss civil · pdf filepolk county comprehensive water supply...

Documents