final presentation
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: final presentation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070602/58770a501a28ab890e8b64b9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CLOUD CHAMBER Alex Robinson Alex Leopardi Jordan Bills
![Page 2: final presentation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070602/58770a501a28ab890e8b64b9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MOTIVATION, BACKGROUND, AND CONTEXT Shed some light on the topic of nuclear radiation Outreach Purposes
A cloud chamber is an easy way to visually demonstrate concepts related to radioactivity, specifically alpha particle decay
Current cloud chamber hinges on availability and use of dry ice
Improve upon this design by the use of thermoelectric tiles as a replacement for dry ice
Picture of our cloud chamber
![Page 3: final presentation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070602/58770a501a28ab890e8b64b9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
THEORY Super saturated alcohol (90% isopropanol) is cooled to around
‐20°C in a chamber using a peltier device to form a cloud. A radioactive material is placed inside the chamber; as nuclear particles decay and fly through the cloud, the alcohol vapor immediately condenses where the particle passes forming visible vapor streamlines.
![Page 4: final presentation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070602/58770a501a28ab890e8b64b9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
RESULTS (USING PELTIER DEVICE)
Cooling capability of the Peltier device largely depended on ability to dissipate heat from the back side of the device.
With proper heat sinks/pumps we were able to get the Peltier device (without chamber on top) to ‐27°C
Stacking Peltier devices only resulted in ‐18°C The coolest temperature we were able to achieve inside
the chamber was ‐10°C but only at the center which was still not cold enough.
![Page 5: final presentation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070602/58770a501a28ab890e8b64b9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
RESULTS (ANALYZING STREAMLINES WITH CHAMBER ON DRY ICE) Used Uranium-238 for the radioactive material as opposed to
the originally proposed lantern mantle Streamlines started being visible at ‐15°C at the bottom of the
petri dish (chamber) Geiger counter gave a reading of 190 CPM (counts per minute) Recorded a 0:20 video of cloud chamber to analyze
streamlines, viewed in the slow motion setting the video was 2:44
Counted streamlines in 8s intervals, determined there were an average of 3.8 streamlines per second equaling about 228 CPM
![Page 6: final presentation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070602/58770a501a28ab890e8b64b9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: final presentation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070602/58770a501a28ab890e8b64b9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CONCLUSION Unsuccessful in creating a cloud chamber useful for
outreach demonstration purposes using the peltier device
Ideas for future iterations Our counted estimate of CPM > Geiger counter CPM
reading possibly due to the Geiger counter only being able to detect decaying particles in a relatively small area
Gained knowledge about nuclear decay, heat transfer, redirection, and dissipation, as well as more technical hands-on skills
Thermal image of Peltier device heating at edges
![Page 8: final presentation](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070602/58770a501a28ab890e8b64b9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
REFERENCES Cameron Reinhart Anthony Butterfield