financial independence - chattanooga€¦ · 21-03-2017 · from storefront providers to online...
TRANSCRIPT
FINANCIALINDEPENDENCEEmpoweringChattanoogans
ChattanoogaMayor’sCouncilforWomen–March21,2017CarolBerz-Chairwoman
AbstractAmulti-facetedapproachforFinancialIndependenceisoffered:preventivemeasurestoincreaseearlyfinancialempowermenttodecreasefuturedemandofpredatoryloans,aviablealternativetotheloans,andsupportiveprogramstoencouragelong-termfinancialstabilityandwell-being.
1
TableofContentsSummary...........................................................................................................................................................2
CurrentStateofFinancialIndependence........................................................................................................2
Location,impact,andtrendsofpredatorylending.........................................................................................4
Locations.......................................................................................................................................................8
LegislativeActioninotherStates...................................................................................................................11
Georgia........................................................................................................................................................13
NorthCarolina............................................................................................................................................13
Virginia........................................................................................................................................................14
ExistingCommunityResources......................................................................................................................15
PreventiveResources.................................................................................................................................15
SupportServices.........................................................................................................................................16
LoanAlternatives........................................................................................................................................17
ProposedGoals/Outcomes.............................................................................................................................18
ProposedLendingAlternative........................................................................................................................19
CommunityWellbeing....................................................................................................................................20
WorkgroupMembership................................................................................................................................21
2
Summary
WhentheFinancialIndependenceworkgroupwasformed,ourprimarygoalwastoreviewandproposeviablealternativestopaydaylending.Wereviewedmanyresearchsourcestolookatthecurrentstateoffinancialwell-beinginourcommunity,state,andthebroaderregion.Whilemuchmorediscoveryisneeded,severalfactorscametoourattention.
Weknowthatinlenientstates,suchasTennessee,theuseofpredatoryloans(paydayloans,titleloans,pawnshoploans,checkcashingbusinesses,etc.)isdoubletherateofuseinstateswithmorerestrictivelegislation.Wealsoknowthatwomenaremorelikelytobetheconsumersoftheseloansthantheirmalecounterparts.Weknowthatourregionisatthecenterofadirefinancialpictureformanyfamilies.
Thesolutionweofferismulti-faceted.Webelievethatacombinationapproachisneeded.Inthefollowingpages,wehaveoutlinedathree-prongedapproach:preventivemeasurestoincreaseearlyfinancialempowermentanddecreasefuturedemandoftheseloans,aviablealternativetotheloans,andsupportiveprogramstoencouragelong-termfinancialstabilityandwell-being.
WewouldalsoencouragestatelegislatorstoconsidertheactionstakenbyourneighborsinNorthCarolinaandGeorgiatobanthemostegregiousratesthatarecurrentlyallowedunderTennesseelaw,andtoallowtraditionalfinancialservicesinstitutionstheabilitytoprovideabroaderrangeofservicestoreduceour‘unbanked’population.
CurrentStateofFinancialIndependence
In2015,theUnitedStatespovertyratewas13.5%.Thisrateequatesto43.1millionAmericanslivingbeneaththepovertythreshold.1Varyingdemographicsarerepresentedamongthesecitizens,andtheimpactonthesecitizensvariesaswell.Alongthelinesofgender,12.2%ofmenwereimpoverishedcomparedto14.8%ofwomen.Single-parenthouseholdsechothesamegenderdisparities.Thepovertyrateforfamiliesheadedbyamanwithoutawifewas14.9%whilethepovertyrateforfamiliesheadedbyafemalewithoutahusbandwas28.2%.2
Povertyvariesbycharacteristicsotherthangender,aswell.Regionally,theSouthhashistoricallyhadthehighestrateofpoverty.ThesouthernregionoftheUnitedStateshadapovertyrateof16.5%in2014–aratethatequatestomorethan19.5millionpeople.3InthestateofTennessee,anestimated18.2%ofits
1http://www.census.gov/library/publications/2016/demo/p60-256.html2http://www.povertyusa.org/the-state-of-poverty/poverty-facts/3http://www.irp.wisc.edu/faqs/faq3.htm(region)
3
residentswereimpoverished.InHamiltonCounty,anestimated15.9%ofitsresidentswereimpoverished.4
TherearemanyreasonswhyAmericansfindthemselveslivinginpoverty.Amongthosereasonsarejobloss,medicalandotherunexpectedexpenses,anddivorce/separation.Thesereasons,alongwithpoororexcessuseofcredit,comprisethetopfivereasonsindividualsfilesomeformofbankruptcy.5
TheAdministrativeOfficeoftheU.S.Courtsreportstherewere818,783filingsofallchaptersofbankruptcyinfiscalyear2015.Chapters7and13aremostoftenfiledbyindividuals.Whiletheoverallnumbersofthosecasesareonthedeclinefrom2010-2015,Chapter13filingsareontheriseat34%in2015comparedto31%in2014.Chapter7filingsdecreasedfrom68%to65%ofthosetotalsin2014and2015,respectively.6
Currently,thetopthreestatesholdingthehighestratesofpersonalbankruptcyfilingsarefoundinthesouthernUnitedStates.Tennesseeleadsthestateswithafilingrateof610casesper100,000people.GeorgiaandAlabama,bothborderingTennesseeandminutesfromChattanooga,Tennessee,followwiththenexthighestratesof524and519,respectively.7
Ratesofpovertyandbankruptciesarecertainlypresentingchallengestoachievingfinancialindependenceforourcommunities,andinthe1990s,anotherchallengebegantogrow–paydaylending.Fromstorefrontproviderstoonlinelendersandbanksthatofferdepositadvanceloans,thisalternativeformoflendinghasbecomearesourcetomeetshort-termfinancialneeds.However,thealreadyburdenedborrowerisoftenunabletorepaytheloanwhendue.Renewalsareobtainedandfeesareassessedthatturnthistemporarysolutionintoalong-termproblemthatisdifficulttoovercomeandprolongstheachievementoffinancialindependence.
Approximately12millionAmericansusepaydayloansperresearchconductedbyPewCharitableTrusts.Itisreportedthat5.5%ofallAmericanshaveutilizedapaydayloanwiththemostcommonborrowerbeingafemaleandwhite.Fifty-twopercentofborrowersarebetweentheagesof25to44;58%arerenters;85%donothaveacollegedegree;and,72%resideinahouseholdwithlessthan$40,000inincome.Thesecharacteristicsarealsocommontoourmostimpoverishedcitizens.
Ithasbeenfoundthatthemajorityofborrowersusepaydaylendingforrecurring,ratherthanunexpected,expenses.However,thecostandfrequencyofpaydayloanspresentfurtherchallengestothosealreadyhavingdifficultymeetingeverydayexpenses.Theaveragenumberofloansperborroweriseightperyear.Theaverageloanamountis$375eachwithanaverageinteresttotalof$520annually.Averagefeesperloanvarydependingonthefeespermittedbythestatewithrangesbeingseenfrom$55to$100.Itispossibletoseetheserangesforaloanforthesameamountfromthesamecompanybasedonthestateofloanorigination.
4http://www.census.gov/did/www/saipe/data/interactive/saipe.html?s_appName=saipe&map_yearSelector=2014&map_geoSelector=aa_c&s_measures=aa_snc&s_county=47065&s_state=475http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0310/top-5-reasons-people-go-bankrupt.aspx6https://www.justice.gov/ust/annual-reports-significant-accomplishments7http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/highest-personal-bankruptcy-rates-in-the-us-by-state.html
4
Anothervarianceamongstatesistheamountofregulationonthisformoflending.Therearethreestatelawtypes:permissive,hybrid,andrestrictive.Permissivestateshavetheleastamountofregulation.Initialfeesof15%orhigheroftheborrowedamountmaybecharged.AnAnnualPercentageRate(APR)rangingfrom391%to521%istheusualrange.Ahybridstateallowsfeesandeventriple-digitAPRs,butcapsonfees,thenumberofloansperborrower,oranincreaseinthenumberofpayperiodsforloanrepaymentmaybeimplemented.ArestrictivestateeitherdoesnotpermitpaydaylendingorestablishesAPRcapsthathaveservedtodecreasethepresenceofpaydaylendinginstitutionsinthesestates.
Tennesseeisoneofthe28permissivestatesintheUS.Whileonlinelendingisanoptionforborrowersinrestrictivestates,only2.9%ofadultsreportusageinthesestates.Hybridstatesseearateof6.3%usage.Permissivestatesseethehighestamountofusageat6.6%,andtherefore,thehighestamountofchallengestofinancialindependencefromthisresource.
Location,impact,andtrendsofpredatorylending
AUniversityofTennesseeatChattanoogaSolutionScholarsclassresearchedpredatorylendinginChattanoogaandalternativesthatarebeingusedinothercommunities.Theyofferedanindustryandregionaloverview,consumerdemographics,communitymapoverlay,alternativemodels,andsuggestedbestpracticesandpartnerships.
Theyfoundthatthesoutheastaccountsfor28.6%ofpaydaylendingestablishmentsinthecountry.Thesoutheasthasalargeconsumerbase,butdisposableincomelevelsforconsumersintheregionarelowerthanforthecountryasawhole.Tennesseehasoneofthehighestpercapitapaydaylendingstore-to-householdratiosinthenation.
5
Theratiooflendingstore-to-householdsin2014inChattanoogais1:1,519(46storesto69,890Households)8
8https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF
6
Duringtheirresearch,theyalsodiscoveredthattheMedianIncomeperhouseholdinChattanoogais$39,683,whilethisisabovetheFederalPovertyThreshold9,thiscanbeamisleadingindicatorasitisthemidpointoftheincomescaleanddoesnotconsidertheextremeoutliersateachendoftheincomespectrum.ThePerCapitaIncome(average)inChattanoogain2014was$24,134,almostthesameasthestateaverageof$24,811,butwaslowerthanthenationalaverageof$28,55510.
UsingthePerCapitaIncomemeasureanddataobtainedfromthe2014AmericanCommunitySurvey,thenumberofhouseholdswithineachhouseholdincomebandwascharted.32.6%ofChattanoogahouseholdsearnedlessthanthetwoadultswithtwochildrenundertheageof18federalthresholdsforpoverty.
Theirresearchsourceswerelargelyconsistentwithotherpaydaylendingreports,suchasthe2012PewCharitableTrustReport,PaydayLendinginAmerica:WhoBorrows,WhereTheyBorrow,andWhy.Whilethelargestsinglepercentageofpaydayloanborrowersarelowtomoderateincome,thereisabroadsegmentofborrowersthatdonotfitthestereotypicalmodel.Accordingtothe2015IBISWorldReportforPaydayLendingIndustry,morethansixpercentofpaydayborrowershaveincomelevelsbetween$75,000and$100,000.
9https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-thresholds.html10http://www.usa.com/chattanooga-tn-income-and-careers.htm
8,017
5,1899,548 8,540
10,29412,086
6,436 6,138
1,783 1,859
11.50%
7.40%
13.70% 12.20% 14.70%
17.30%
9.20% 8.80%
2.60% 2.70%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0%
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Lessthan$10,000
$10,000to
$14,999
$15,000to
$24,999
$25,000to
$34,999
$35,000to
$49,999
$50,000to
$74,999
$75,000to
$99,999
$100,000to
$149,999
$150,000to
$199,999
$200,000ormore
ChattanoogaHouseholdIncomeCount&PercentagefromtheAmericanCommunitySurvey2014
HouseholdIncome %ofChattanoogaHouseholdCount
2016FederalPovertyThreshold2 Adults&2Childernunderageof18
7
(IBISWorldReportforPaydayLendingIndustry)
ComparingthemarketsegmentbreakdownofconsumerincometothehouseholdincomeofChattanoogans,wecanascertainthat59.5%ofChattanoogahouseholdsmakeanincomeof$50,000orless,whichcorrelatesto83.7%ofthegeneralmarketsegmentofpaydayloanborrowers.Quick,generalcalculationstellusthat~34,809(49.8%oftotalhouseholdsregardlessofincome)Chattanoogahouseholdswith$50,000incomelevelorlowerfallintothesegmentofhouseholdsthatusepredatorylending.
Additionally,bothreportsidentifyrecurringlivingexpensesasakeydriverforborrowing.ThePewreportshow53%offirstborrowersidentifyingregularexpensesasthereasonfortheirfirstpaydayloan,whileTheIBISreportcitesthatpercentageat46%.
(IBISWorldReportforPaydayLendingIndustry)
8
Locations
Using2010censusdataandReference.govtolocatethelocationsofpaydaylendersintheChattanoogaarea,theycreatedamapshowingMedianHouseholdIncomebyCensusTractandpaydaylenders(circles)aswell.Themapshowsthatpaydaylendinglocationsareinareaswherethemedianhouseholdincomeislowerthanthemidpointof$42,892(goldcoloredareasinatthemidpoint.Returningtothefactthat83.7%ofpaydaylendingborrowersmakelessthan$50,000peryear,thelocationofthelenderstakesadvantageofthesurroundingareaslowerincome.
9
Examiningthelocationsofpaydaylendersledthemtoconsiderpublictransportationroutesandhowtheycorrelatedtothelocationsofthepaydaylenders.MappingthelocationofCARTAbusstops(starsonmap)andlayingthatatopthepaydaylendinglocationmapitwasfoundthatmanyofthepaydaylendinglocationsarealongCARTAlines.ReferencingthemarketsegmentationdatafromIBISWorld,40.9%ofpaydaylenderborrowershaveanincomeunder$25,000.Whileanecdotal,thissegmentmightbethemostlikelytonothaveaccesstoreliabletransportationandmightrelyonpublictransportation.FourmajorCARTArouteswereidentifiedwherepaydaylenderswerelocated,BrainerdRoad,Highway58,23rdStreet,andRossvilleBoulevard.
Afterlookingatthelocationsandpublictransportation,theylookedatthetotalpopulationbycensustractandthepopulationdensitypersquaremile(seebelow).Thereisadefinitecorrelationbetweenhigherpopulationdensityandlowermedianhouseholdincome.MostofthepaydaylendinglocationsinChattanoogaareinhigherdensityareas,whichinturnsmeanstheyareinthelowersocioeconomicareasaswell.
10
11
LegislativeActioninotherStates
In2012,thePewResearchCentercompleteditsSafeSmallDollarLoanResearchProject.Thisprojectincludedareviewofall50states’paydaylendingstatutesandclassificationofeachintothecategoriesofrestrictive,permission,andhybrid.Thesedefinitionsfromtheprojectarefoundbelow:
• Restrictivestateseitherdonotpermitpaydaylendingorhavepricecapslowenoughtoeliminatepaydaylendinginthestate.Thisratecapisoften36percentAnnualPercentageRate(APR).Generally,paydayloanstorefrontsarenotfoundinthesestates.Thiscategoryincludesstateswheredeferredpresentmenttransactions(post-datedchecks)arenotauthorized,arenotspecificallyexemptedfromgeneralstatelawsonusury,orareexplicitlyprohibitedbystatestatute.Twenty-ninepercentofAmericansliveinthe14statesandtheDistrictofColumbiathathaveaRestrictivepaydayloanregulatorystructure.
• Hybridstateshaverelativelymoreexactingrequirements,withatleastoneofthefollowingthreeformsofregulation:(1)ratecaps,usuallyaround10percentoftheborrowedprincipal,whicharelowerthanmoststatesbutstillpermitloanstobeissuedwithtriple-digitAPRs;(2)restrictionsonthenumberofloansperborrower,suchasamaximumofeightloansperborrowerperyear;or(3)allowingborrowersmultiplepayperiodstorepayloans.Storefrontsthatofferpaydayloansexistinsubstantialnumbersinthesestates,thoughthemarketmaybemoreconsolidatedandper-storeloanvolumemaybehigherherethaninlessrestrictivestates.SixteenpercentofAmericansliveintheeightHybridstates.
• Permissivestatesaretheleastregulatedandallowinitialfeesof15percentoftheborrowedprincipalorhigher.Mostofthesestateshavesomeregulations,butallowforpaydayloansdueinfullonaborrower’snextpaydaywithAPRsusuallyintherangeof391to521percent($15to$20per$100borrowedforatwo-weekloan).Paydayloanstorefrontsarereadilyavailabletoborrowerslocatedinthesestates.MostAmericans—55percent—liveinthe28Permissivestates.11
Pew’scategorizationprovidessummarizedevidenceastotherangeofpolicyapproachesstatescantaketoregulateandrestrictpaydaylending.Somestates,likeneighboringGeorgiaandNorthCarolina(restricted),haveprohibitedpaydaylendersfromphysicallyoperatingintheirstates.Otherstates,likeVirginia(hybrid),haveplacedonlylimitedrestrictionsonthelenders.Finally,mostofthecountry’sstatesarelikeTennessee(permission)withverylittle,ifany,regulationenactedtoprotectconsumers.
ForTennesseelegislators,thekeytakeawayfromPew’sanalysismaybethattherearemanyopportunitiestoregulatepaydaylendinginamannerthatbetterprotectsconsumersandmaintainsitasacredit“choice,”areasonoftencitedforitsexistence.Alistoftheseregulatoryapproachesisincludedbelow(listedinorderofmostrestrictivetomostpermissive):
11http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/multimedia/data-visualizations/2014/~/media/data%20visualizations/interactives/2014/state%20payday%20loan%20regulation%20and%20usage%20rates/report/state_payday_loan_regulation_and_usage_rates.pdf
12
• Prohibitpaydaylending• Capinterestratesat36%orless• Prohibitpost-datecheckuse• Paybackperiodextension• Capinterestratesbasedonapercentageoftheloan• Restrictionsonnumberofloansorloanfrequency• Feelimitations• Limitthedurationofpost-datecheckuse
Beforereviewinghowthreesoutheasternstateschoosetolimitpaydaylendingintheirstates,itisimportanttonotethatthefederalgovernmentuniquelyprotectsonegroupofAmericans–ActiveUSMilitary–fromhigh-interestpaydayloans.
TheMilitaryLendingActof2006(JohnWarnerNationalDefenseAuthorizationAct)cappedinterestratesat36%forpaydayloans,vehicletitleloans,anddepositadvanceproducts.TheActwasextendedin2015toincludemoretypesofconsumercredit(effectiveOctober3,2016),includingcreditcards12.ThismeansthatforactivemembersoftheUSmilitarythefollowingpaydaylendingrestrictionsareinplace:
A36%interestcap,whichincludesthefollowingcostsincalculatingtheinterestrate(withsomeexceptions):financecharges;creditinsurancepremiumsorfees;add-onproductssoldinconnectionwiththecredit;and otherfeeslikeapplicationorparticipationfees,withsomeexceptions.13
TheMilitaryLendingActitselfwasanencouragingdevelopmentasitsetamorereasonableinterestrateforasizablesegmentofthepopulation(estimatedtobemorethan5millionindividuals14)thatmayfacefrequentshorttermcreditneeds,inherentlyacknowledgingthepotentiallypredatorynatureofmoreaggressiverates.TheAct’sexpansionprovidesevengreaterprotectiontothisconsumersegment.
TherearealsofederaleffortstoaffordconsumerprotectionfromaggressivepaydaylendinginterestratestoallAmericans.AftertheDodd-FrankWallStreetReformandConsumerProtectionActgrantedpaydaylendingoversightauthoritytotheConsumerFinancialProtectionBureau(CFPB)in2010,theCFPBproposedaruleinJune2016thatwouldcapinterestratesat36%forallloans.
However,thefateoftheproposedrule,forwhichthepubliccommentperiodclosedonOctober7,2016,15remainsinlimboinpartbecausethecommentshavenotbeenaddressedandtherulerevisedasnecessarybutmoreoverbecausetheTrumpadministrationthreatenedtoweakentheDodd-FrankAct.
12https://www.consumerfinance.gov/askcfpb/1785/what-types-loans-are-covered-under-military-lending-act.html;https://www.federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/caletters/Attachment_CA_Letter_16-6_MLA_Exam_Procedures.pdf;https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2007/fil07083.html;https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2015/fil15037.html13https://www.consumerfinance.gov/askcfpb/1783/what-are-my-rights-under-military-lending-act.html14https://library.nclc.org/military-lending-act-dramatically-expands-coverage-oct-3-201615https://www.consumerfinance.gov/policy-compliance/rulemaking/rules-under-development/notice-proposed-rulemaking-payday-vehicle-title-and-certain-high-cost-installment-loans/
13
RegardlessofthefuturetheCFPBoritsproposedrule,itisclearthatpaydaylendingrestrictionsarenecessarytoprotectconsumers.Manystateshavelongacknowledgedthisneedandtakenlegislativeactiontoensuretheirstates’citizensareprotected.Thefollowingsectionprovidessimplifiedcasestudiesofalternativeapproachestoprotectingresidentsfrompredatorylendingpractices,allundertakenbysoutheasternstatesthatshareaborderwithTennessee.
Georgia
Uniquely,Georgiafirstprohibitedpaydayloansviaa1955law,theGeorgiaIndustrialLoanAct.However,enforcementoftheActwaslaxandpaydaylendersoperatedwithinthestate.Afterrecognizingtheproblempaydaylendingpresents,fourStatesenatorssponsoredthePaydayLendingActof2004,whichmadepaydaylendingacriminaloffense.16TheActwouldgoontoweathernumerouslawsuitsfromlendersandpaydaylendingcontinuestobeprohibitedinGeorgia.
Georgia’sActhadsponsorsfromboththeRepublicanandDemocraticparties(SenatorDonCheeks[R],District23,SenatorCaseyCagle[R],District49;SenatorBillStephens[R],District51;SenatorTerrellStar[D],District44)andreceivedbipartisansupportinitspassage.ItwassignedintoeffectbyGovernorSonnyPerdue[R]in2004.17
Georgia’sstategovernmentwebsitedescribesthepaydaylendinglawsasfollows:“TheGeorgiaIndustrialLoanActof1955essentiallymadepaydaylendingillegalbyrequiringstatelicensingandregistrationandbyimposingstrictusurylimitsonsmallloans.In2004,theGeorgiaGeneralAssemblyincreasedthefinesandcriminalpenaltiesforpeoplemakingsmallloansatillegalratesofinterest.ThelawwentintoeffectinMay2004,andhassurvivedchallengesinfederalcourt.ReferredtoasthePaydayLendingActof2004,thislawauthorizesmisdemeanorchargesagainstviolators,aswellasfinesofupto$5,000perviolationandapossiblejailsentenceof1year.”18
NorthCarolina
LikeGeorgia,NorthCarolinaprohibitspaydaylending.However,theState’sapproachtoarrivingatincreasedprotectionforNorthCarolina’sconsumerswasdifferent.Afterenactingalawthatpermittedpaydayloansin1997,theNorthCarolinalegislatureallowedtheNorthCarolinaCheckCashingActtoexpire2001,choosingtonolongerpermittheselawsintheState.Theparagraphsbelow,fromaUNCLawandNorthCarolinaBankingInstitutepaper-PaydayLendinginNorthCarolina:NowYouSeeIt,NowYouDon’t–succinctlyexplainsNorthCarolina’spathtopaydaylendingprohibition.19
16http://www.responsiblelending.org/payday-lending/policy-legislation/states/pa-GeorgiaPayday-0606.pdf17http://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/en-US/display/20032004/SB/15718http://www.consumer.ga.gov/consumer-topics/payday-loans19http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1224&context=ncbi
14
PriortoOctober1,1997,NorthCarolinalawdidnotexpresslypermitthemakingofpaydayloans.Duringthisperiod,allshort-termloansweresubjecttotheNorthCarolinaFinanceActandNorthCarolina'susurylaws.OnOctober1,1997,theNorthCarolinaGeneralAssemblypassedtheNorthCarolinaCheckCashingAct(NCCCA).ThisActpermittedpaydayloansinNorthCarolinabutrequiredthattheybenomorethan$300includingfees,containamaturitydatenotmorethanthirty-onedaysaftertheloanwasissued,andrequiredthatthetotalfeesnotexceed15%ofthefacevalueofthecheck.Furthermore,theNCCCArequiredthatallpaydaylendersbelicensedbythestateofNorthCarolinaascheckcashers.TheNCCCAcontaineda"sunsetdate"ofJuly31,2001.TheNorthCarolinaGeneralassemblyextendedthisdateuntilAugust31,2001;however,theNCCCAwasallowedtoexpireonAugust31,2001.
Duringthisfour-year"experiment'withpaydaylending,paydaylendersoperatedunderthe"standardbusinessmodel."Underthestandardbusinessmodel,paydaylenderswereproperlylicensed,usedtheirownfundstoloanmoney,andactedinaccordwiththeregulationssetforthintheNorthCarolinaCheckCashingAct.Theexpiration,onAugust31,2001,oftheNCCCAdidnotputanendtothepaydaylendingindustryinNorthCarolina.
AftertheNCCCAexpired,NorthCarolinacontinuedtofacechallengeswithpaydaylendersoperatingoutsideofstandardbusinessmodels.A2003courtrulingputanendtoanalternativemodelthatsawthelenderpurchasepropertyfromtheborrowerandthenleaseitbacktohimorherinexchangeforaloan.In2005,theNorthCarolinaCommissionerofBanksprohibitedtherent-a-charteroragencymodelsforpaydaylendingthatproliferatedinNorthCarolinafollowingtheNCCCA’sexpiration.
Virginia
Virginiapermitspaydayloans.However,in2008,thestateaddedrestrictionstoincreaseconsumerprotection.TheVirginiaPaydayLoanActof2008,whichwasanupdatedversionofa2002law,includesthefollowingprovisions20:
§ OnePaydayLoanatatimeperborrower§ Databaseestablishedtotrackanddetermineeligibilityforpaydayloans§ Longerrepaymenttermforpaydayloans.TheduedateforaVirginiapaydayloanfroma
licenseewillnowbebasedontwotimesyourpaycycle.Thus,ifyougetpaidonceaweek,youwillhavetwoweekstorepaytheloan.
§ Changeinfees,charges&interest:§ Interest–amaximumsimpleannualrateofupto36%§ LoanFee–upto20%oftheamountoftheloan(maximumof$100loanfeeona
$500loan)§ VerificationFee–upto$5.00(databasefee)
20https://www.scc.virginia.gov/bfi/files/10vac5_200_notice.pdf;https://www.scc.virginia.gov/bfi/files/pay_guide.pdf
15
§ Paydayloanshallnotbemadeonthesamedayoneispaidinfull§ ExtendedPaymentPlanmaybeavailableonpaydayloansobtainedafterJanuary1,2009.§ ExtendedTermLoanmaybeavailableona5thpaydayloanina180-dayperiodobtained
afterJanuary1,2009.
TheVirginiaPaydayLoanActof2008wassponsoredby14PatronsfromboththeRepublican(9Patrons)andDemocratic(5Patrons)parties,withDelegateG.GlennOder[R],HouseDistrict94,astheChiefPatron.21
ExistingCommunityResources
TheFinancialIndependenceworkgroupreachedouttononprofitorganizationswhooffersomeformoffinancialliteracy,whetheritispreventiveorasupportservice.With28responses,thegrouplearnedthatthereisagapinservicesforpaydaylendingalternatives.Thesurveyrespondentsidentifiedadditionalgapsincluding:inequalityingenderpay,availabilityofmicro-lending,particularlytowomen,minoritiesandnon-Englishspeakers,lackofjobsandworkforcedevelopment,predatorylendingregulations,paydayandtitleloanalternatives.
Thereareseveralcurrentcommunityprovidersofdifferentaspectsoffinancialindependenceresources.Theirmissionsandtargetaudiencesarevastlydifferent,butthereisanexistingnetworkofresourcesbothonthepreventiveandsupportiveresourcetargets.
Thereareveryfewviablealternativestopredatorylending.Therearetwolistedbelow–bothofwhicharepartofaCreditUnionprograms.
Thisisnotanexhaustivelist.
PreventiveResources
AStepAheadChattanooga
BankOnScenicCity
Boys&GirlsClubofChattanooga
BrightBridge
CatholicCharitiesofEastTennessee
ChangeYour$tory
ChattanoogaAreaChamberofCommerce
21https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?081+mbr+HB12
16
ChattanoogaNeighborhoodEnterprise(CNE)
ChattanoogaRoomintheInn
CommonCentsFinancialLiteracy
ConsumerCreditCounselingServices(CCCS)–PartnershipforFamilies,Children,andAdults
FamilyPromiseGreaterChattanooga
Girls,Inc.
NeighborhoodUniversity(attheFamilyJusticeCenter)
NorthsideNeighborhoodHouse
OperationHOPE
ProsperityUnlimited
SoutheastTennesseeAreaAgencyonAgingandDisability(SETAAAD)
SoutheastTennesseeDevelopmentDistrict(SETDD)
TheCaringPlace
TheChalmersCenter
UniversityofTennesseeExtension
UTCFinancialWellnessCenter
SupportServices
BethanyChristianServices
BreastCancerSupportServices
BrightBridge
BrightBridgeWomen’sCenter
CatholicCharitiesofEastTennessee
ChangeYour$tory
ChattanoogaAreaFoodBank
ChattanoogaHumanServices
ChattanoogaNeighborhoodEnterprise(CNE)
ChattanoogaRoomintheInn
Children’sAdvocacyCenterofHamiltonCounty
17
ConsumerCreditCounselingServices(CCCS)
Faith&Finances-TheChalmersCenter
FamilyPromiseGreaterChattanooga
Goodwill
green|spaces-EmpowerChattanooga
HabitatforHumanityofGreaterChattanooga
HomelessCoalition
LaPazChattanooga
MetropolitanMinistries
MomentumNetwork
NorthsideNeighborhoodHouse
OperationHOPE
ProsperityUnlimited
SalvationArmy
SoutheastTennesseeAreaAgencyonAgingandDisability(SETAAAD)
SoutheastTennesseeDevelopmentDistrict(SETDD)
TheCaringPlace
UnitedWayofGreaterChattanooga-211SupportServiceCenters
UniversityofTennesseeExtension
UrbanLeagueofGreaterChattanooga
WewouldencouragetheCitytocreateopportunitiesformorecommunicationamongthesepreventiveandsupportserviceproviders.Coordinationandmeaningfulinteractionwouldbenefitboththeserviceprovidersandtheirclients.Whilethe211systemisagoodstart,wewouldliketoseeexpandedhoursandcoordinationofthereferralsmadethroughthesystem.
LoanAlternatives
BlueCrossBlueShieldofTennessee
TennesseeValleyFederalCreditUnion
18
Whilethesecreditunionsofferlendingalternatives,theirreachislimitedandbyadmissiontheprogramsarenotwidelymarketed.
ProposedGoals/Outcomes
1. ReducethenumberinChattanoogausinghighinterestloans
OurgoalistoreducepredatorylendingusageinChattanoogatothreepercentorbelowthroughacombinationofstrategies:preventiveeducationtostemthedemandforfuturepredatorylendingusage,makingalternativestopredatoryloansmoreavailable,andleveragingacommunitynetworktoprovideongoingsupporttopreventrecurringusageofpredatorylending.
2. Increasethenumberofindividualsthathaveaccesstotraditionalfinancialservices.
Chattanoogaisaparticipantinthe“BankOn”program.Severallocalfinancialinstitutionsareparticipatinginthecontinuedgrowthofthisprogram.
BankonScenicCity
BankOncoalitionsarelocally-ledpartnershipsbetweenlocalpublicofficials;city,state,andfederalgovernmentagencies;financialinstitutions;andcommunityorganizationsthatworktogethertohelpimprovethefinancialstabilityofunbankedandunderbankedindividualsandfamiliesintheircommunities.TheBankOnnationalinitiativebuildsonagrassrootsmovementofdozensofcoalitionsincitiesacrossthecountry;thesefirst-generationbankingaccessprogramshavealreadyconnectedtensofthousandsofpeopletosafeandaffordableaccounts.Inadditiontoconnectingunbankedindividualstoaccounts,BankOnprogramsraisepublicawareness,targetoutreachtotheunbanked,andexpandaccesstofinancialeducation.
3. CreatepathforTennesseetoreduceand/orlimitpredatorylendersthroughlegislativeaction,informedbyactioninotherstates,aslistedpreviouslyinthisreport.SupporttheeffortstocaptheinterestratesatthelevelsetbytheMilitaryLendingAct.
4. EncourageTennesseetocreateopportunitiesfortraditionallenderstoofferabroaderproductmix,allowingmoreloanalternativestomoreborrowers.
5. Fundingsupportwillbecrucialintheearlyyearsofbuildingaviablelongtermsolution.WewouldencouragetheCitytosupportpublic-privatepartnershipsintheirreviewofviablealternatives.WewouldalsosupportthecreationofacommunitybasedtaskforcetocreatesynergybetweenexistingresourcesandinitiativessuchasChattanooga2.0,ChattanoogaChamberofCommerce,andtheexistingresourceslistedinprevioussections.
19
ProposedLendingAlternative
Thisteamhasreviewedseveralcommunitysolutionsfromacrossthecountry.Aftercarefulreview,wearerecommendingthatChattanoogacreateaprogrammodeledfromBrownsville,Texas.
ThisprogramismadepossiblethroughagreementsbetweenaCommunityDevelopmentFinancialInstitution(CDFI),andlocalemployers.HereinChattanooga,ourlocalCDFIisChattanoogaNeighborhoodEnterprise(CNE).TheyhavehadrepresentativesparticipateinthisFinancialIndependenceteamandhaveaddedthisalternativetotheirorganization’sstrategicplan.
Hereisasummaryoftheprogram,ashighlightedontheCommunityEconomicDevelopmentAssociationofMichigan22:
Iflow-to-moderateresidentsneed“quickcash,”whynotbeatpredatorylendersattheirowngame?TACDCandCitiCommunityDevelopmentresearchedalternativestopaydaylendingthatcouldbebroughttoscale.TheyfoundoneprogramatalocalCDCinBrownsville,Texas,adaptedit,usedstartupfundsfromCitiandpilotedtheCommunityLoanCenterSmallDollarLoanProgram.
It’samarket-basedapproach.Thereisnostorefront.It’sanemployer-basedloantoworkers.Theyarefairlypricedsmall-dollarloanswithreasonableterms.Itwillofferdirectcompetitiontohighcostlenders.It’snonprofitdriven;that’sthekeycomponent.
Thesesmallloansworkasfollows:TexasCommunityCapital,anonprofitloanfundTACDCstarted10yearsago,operatestheprogramanddistributesthecopyrightedloansoftware.TACDCthenrecruitslocalnonprofitstoparticipateintheprogram.Eachnonprofitisinchargeofloanorigination,processingandservicing.Thenonprofitsrecruitlocalcompaniestoparticipateintheprogram.Participatingemployersoffersmallloanstoemployeesviapayrolldeduction,whichisalldonethroughcomputersoftware.Employeescanapplyonline.
Loanterms:
• Max$1,000loan(orupto½ofborrower’smonthlygrosspay)• Oneyearloanterm,withnoprepaymentpenalty• 18%interest• $20originationfee• Repaymentsare$23/weekor$94/month• Mayonlytakeoutoneloanatatime• Can’trefinanceuntilsixmonthslater
22http://cedam.info/2014/12/payday/
20
Nocredithistoryisrequired,approvalsarequick,thereisnocollateralandtheloanmoneyisplaceddirectlyintotheemployee’sbankaccountusuallywithin24hours.Freefinancialcounselingisavailabletoanyonetakingaloanthroughtheprogram.
Whilethisprogramhasbeenasuccess,itisstilllimitedbybeingdependentuponemployerparticipation.ItisaviablealternativethatcanbelicensedandimplementedthroughtheBrownsvillegroup.Weseethisasanimportantsteponthepathtocreatingamorefinanciallyindependentcommunity,notanendstategoal.
CommunityWellbeing
Uponreviewofthedataabove,itiscleartoseetheneedformoreexpansivelendingalternatives,andfortheCityofChattanoogaandtheStateofTennesseetoacttoimproveourfinancialwellbeingasacommunity23,24.Therearemany‘spotremedies’withveryfewcompletesolutionstoourcurrentstateoffinancialinstability.
Thereisacorrelationbetweenfinancialargumentsamongfamilymembersanddivorce25.Ifwewantstrongfamilies,wewantthemtobefinanciallystable.Ifwewantathrivingbusinessdevelopmentenvironment,wewantmorefinancialindependence.Ifwewantmorealoyal,productive,andengagedworkforce,wewantmorefinancialindependence26.
Wecannotaffordforourcurrenttrendstocontinue.Financialindependenceandwell-beingareaboutfarmorethandollars.Itisaboutthecreatinganopportunityforfamiliesandourcommunitytothrive!
23http://info.healthways.com/hubfs/Gallup-Healthways%20State%20of%20American%20Well-Being_2016%20Community%20Rankings%20vFINAL.pdf?t=148886353843924http://info.healthways.com/hubfs/Well-Being_Index/2014_Data/Gallup-Healthways_State_of_American_Well-Being_2014_Financial_Rankings.pdf?t=148886353843925http://www.k-state.edu/media/newsreleases/jul13/predictingdivorce71113.html26https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/research-reports/financial-wellness-at-work/
21
WorkgroupMembership
DominaAlford
JenniferHarper
DawnHjelseth
JenniferHolder
TraceeSmith
WithSpecialThanksto:
TheUniversityofTennesseeatChattanoogaSolutionScholarsclassofFall2016
LizaSoydanofVisionario
NelsonGosnell