fishbeck, thompson, carr & huber · 2016. 6. 11. · fishbeck, thompson, carr & huber, inc,...

fishbeck, thompson, carr & huberengineers e scientists • architects

FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT

FOR

ELECTRO-VOICE, INC.Buchanan, Michigan

FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT

FOR

ELECTRO-VOICE, INC.Buchanan, Michigan

December 1996Project No. F93307Q

Prepared by:

FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC,6090 East Fulton, P.O. Box 211

Ada, Michigan 49301-0211(616) 676-2666

7402 Westshire Drive, Suite 110Lansing, Michigan 48917-9764

(517) 627-

CERTIFICATION

The Lagoon Soils Remediation was performed under the Operable Unit Consent Decree and Statement of

Work for the Remedial Design and Remedial Action for the First Operable Unit that was filed with the U.S.

District Court on September 20, 1993. This Remedial Action Report addresses Phase 1 of the first operable

unit, the capping of the former lagoon area soils.

The work was conducted in accordance with the following documents dated June 1995 and revised September

1995:

• Basis of Design Report

• Construction Quality Assurance Plan

• Operation and Maintenance Manual

• Design Drawings

• Project Manual

On behalf of Mark IV Audio, Inc. and in accordance with the Consent Decree, this report complies with the

following statement:

"To the best of my knowledge, after through investigation, I certify that the information contained in or

accompanying this submission is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties

for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."

Signed:

<fr+ui* /\- gtsaJames A. Susan, P.E. Date

TABLE OF CONTENTSPage

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2.0 BACKGROUND .................................................. 2

3.0 PRELIMINARY WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.1 Clearing and Grubbing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.2 Fence Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.3 Drum Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.4 Monitoring Well and Lysimeter Abandonment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43.5 Temporary Fencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

4.0 CONTAMINATED SOIL EXCAVATION AND PLACEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54.2 Surveying . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64.3 Compacted Soil Density Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64.4 Modifications to the Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

4.4.1 Excavation Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74.4.2 Excavation Bottom Contours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74.4.3 Final Cap Subgrade Contours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

5.0 EXCAVATION BACKFILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.2 Soil Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.3 Re-excavation of Backfilled Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

6.0 CAP CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96.2 Clay Cap Material Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

6.2.1 Laboratory Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96.3 Field Density Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106.4 Surveying and Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

7.0 DRAINAGE LAYER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137.2 Soil Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137.3 Surveying . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

8.0 TOPSOIL AND SEEDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

9.0 FINAL SITE WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159.1 Access Road Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159.2 Fencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159.3 Drainage Swales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

10.0 DECONTAMINATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

11.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1711.1 Organizations and Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1711.2 Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1711.3 Submittals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

12.0 PREFINAL AND FINAL INSPECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Listof Tables

Table 1 • Clay Cap Material Field Density Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

List of Appendices

Appendix 1 * Daily Construction Progress ReportsAppendix 2 • Construction Record DrawingsAppendix 3 • Septage Analytical ResultsAppendix 4 • Geotechnical Laboratory ResultsAppendix 5 • Field Density Testing ResultsAppendix 6 * Excavation Limits LetterAppendix 7 • Survey DataAppendix 8 * Meeting MinutesAppendix 9 * Preflnal and Final Inspection Reports

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report describes the work that was completed for the Lagoon Soils Remediation at the Electro-Voice (EV)

Superfund Site in Buchanan, Michigan. The work was performed in accordance with the requirements

identified in the Record of Decision and the Statement of Work included in the Consent Decree dated

December 21, 1993. The work performed at the site included the following:

* Excavation of contaminated soil related to the former lagoons.

* Placement of excavated soils in the area to be capped.* Construction of a cap meeting the requirements of Michigan Act 64.

* Fencing of the capped area.

* Miscellaneous site work.

The work was conducted during the period May 28, 1996, through August 23, 1996. The remediation

contractor was Michigan Earthworks, Inc., of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr &

Huber, Inc. (FTC&H) provided inspection and construction phase engineering services. A record of the daily

work effort is documented in the daily construction progress reports. These reports are presented in

Appendix 1.

12/26/96 - 1 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS

2.0 BACKGROUND

In February 1983, the EV site was placed on the Michigan and the National Priority Lists. AnAdministrative Order by Consent (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [ EPA] Docket No. V-W-87-C-023) to conduct a Remedial Investigation (RI) and Feasibility Study (FS) was entered into by EV and theEPA on October 8, 1987. The results of the RI were presented in a report titled, Final RemedialInvestigation Report for Electro-Voice, Inc., dated August 1990, prepared by FTC&H. The results of theFS were presented in a report titled, Feasibility Study Report, Electro-Voice, Inc. Site, dated September 10,1991, and prepared by CH2M Hill.

A Record of Decision for the First Operable Unit (onsite remediation) was signed by the EPA RegionalAdministrator on June 23, 1992. The Operable Unit Consent Decree and Statement of Work for theRemedial Design and Remedial Action for the First Operable Unit at the EV facility was filed with the U.S.District Court on September 20, 1993. The Consent Decree/Statement of Work (SOW) divided theRemedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA) work into two phases: Phase I addresses the former lagoonarea soils, lower aquifer investigation, and off-property groundwater monitoring; Phase II addresses the drywell area soils and onsite groundwater. On October 4, 1993, EV received authorization from the U.S. EPAto proceed with the Phase I RD/RA work as set forth in the Consent Decree/SOW.

The additional studies and the lower aquifer investigation area were completed in May 1995 and theremedial design was initiated. The additional studies results were presented in the Phase I Remedial DesignAdditional Studies Report for Electro-Voice, Inc., dated April 1995 and revised May 1995. The remedial

design elements are described in the following reports and documents:

• Basis of Design Report• Construction Quality Assurance Plan

• Operation and Maintenance Manual

• Design Drawings

• Project Manual

These documents are dated June 1995 and were revised September 1995.

The remedial design for the project was approved by EPA on November 8, 1995. Bidding and contractorselection were completed in May 1996. Remedial action work began at the site on May 28, 1996.

12/26/96 - 2 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REFT.JAS

3.0 PRELIMINARY WORK

Preliminary work at the site included tasks necessary to prepare the site for construction vehicle access,excavation activities, and cap construction activities.

3.1 Clearing and Grubbing

The excavation and cap area were cleared of trees beginning in April 1996. The trees were cut to a pointapproximately two to three feet above the ground surface. The tree trunks and limbs were removed fromthe site. This work was accomplished under a separate contract before RA construction began.

Any trees and shrubs remaining at the start of the RA construction were cut and placed in the cap area bythe contractor. The wood was then broken into small pieces by running a bulldozer repeatedly over thematerial. The stumps remaining from the tree removal were ground in-place using a stump grinder. Allbranches and chips resulting from clearing and grinding were excavated with the contaminated soil andplaced under the cap.

3.2 Fence Removal

The existing fence was removed prior to beginning the excavation. The fence posts were removed and takenfrom the site. The fence fabric was rolled up and stored on the site. Undamaged fabric and posts werereused as part of the new fence construction. The remaining posts and fabric were disposed offsite.

3.3 Drum Removal

Approximately 30 drums were located on the northern portion of the site. These drums contained cuttingsfrom the lower aquifer investigation conducted as part of the additional studies. The boring for the loweraquifer investigation was located near MW-9S and MW-9D. The drums were emptied and the contents ofthe drums were placed in the cap area, along with the emptied drums. Once placed, the drums were crushed

using a bulldozer.

12/26/96 -3 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2Ri;PTJAS

3.4 Monitoring Well and Lysimeter Abandonment

Six monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW^, MW-10, and MW-16) and four lysimeters (Sl-1, SL-2, NL-1, and NL-2) that were located in the limit of the cap or the excavation limit were cut at grade andgrouted in-place. The grout used was a lean cement and bentonite slurry which was pumped down thecasing of the well or lysimeter.

Monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, and MW-16 were replaced after all capping activities were completed.The lysimeters and other abandoned monitoring wells were not replaced. The data from the lysimeters wereno longer needed, and it was no longer necessary to sample the other monitoring wells.

3.5 Temporary Fencing

Prior to beginning excavation activities, temporary fencing was placed at the perimeter of the site to restrictaccess.

12/26/96J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REFr.JAS

4.0 CONTAMINATED SOIL EXCAVATION AND PLACEMENT

Contaminated soil located outside the area of the planned cap was excavated and transported to the cap area.The excavated soils formed the subgrade of the cap. The excavation limits were established during theadditional studies phase of the project and verified during construction by survey, and measurement byonsite personnel. Figure l(Appendix 2) shows the design excavation limits. Excavation of soils began onJune 4, 1996, and was completed on July 27, 1996. Soil excavation took longer than anticipated due tofrequent rain which inhibited vehicle movement at the site.

4.1 Description

The impacted soil was excavated using a two-cubic yard (cy) excavator and moved to the planned cap areausing two six-wheel off-road haul trucks. The soils where then spread in one-foot lifts with a CaterpillarD6 bulldozer.

Soil excavation began in the low area in the northwest area of the site. In this area, soil was to be removedto a point 2 to 3 feet above the groundwater table. At the time of the excavation, the groundwater tab1: wasfound to be approximately 2.5 feet higher than assumed during design. The excavation in this area wasterminated at a point approximately 1 foot above the water table, approximately at elevation 685.6. Thesoils in this low area were generally clean to silly sands, as indicated by previous soil borings. However,the top 1 to 2 feet of soils over the area was organic muck that were difficult to handle, particularly whenwet due to the frequent rains. These soils were mixed with drier, deeper sands before placing them withinthe limits of the cap. A total of 24,500 cy of soil was removed from the area of excavation and placed inthe area of the planned cap.

An old septic tank was encountered on the west slope of the northwest excavation area, at approximatecoordinate locations EO+66, N5+00 (Figure 1, Appendix 2). The tank encountered appeared to be atypical residential septic tank that was full of thickened septage. The tank and material were removed andplaced under the cap area. A sample of the thickened septage was collected and analyzed. The analyticalresults are presented in Appendix 3.

12/26/96J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.. I AS

4.2 Surveying

A 44-foot grid was established over the area of excavation prior to beginning the RA work. This was thesame grid that was used during the additional studies phase of the project to preverify limits of contaminatedsoil. At each grid node, stakes were placed and the required excavation cut was identified. Additionalstaking was performed at various times as the excavation proceeded to ensure that the required limits were

met.

After a final review of the surveyed bottom contours, an area was identified that had not been sufficientlyexcavated. This area was located in the central excavation area between grid nodes 12, 13, and 14 to thenorth and 27, 28, and 29 to the south. A layer averaging approximately three feet thick needed to beremoved from this area. Approximately 2,000 cy of soil was excavated from this area and placed in the areato be capped. The additional excavation was verified by measurements made by onsite personnel.

The final excavation contours are shown on Figure 2 (Appendix 2). This additional area of excavation isidentified on Figure 2 (Appendix 2).

4.3 Compacted Soil Density Measurements

Two samples of the excavated soils were submitted to the geotechnical laboratory for modified proctortesting. The results of the tests are included in Appendix 4. The maximum dry density and optimummoisture content for the samples were 125 pounds per cubic foot (Ibs/cf) and 10%, and 124.5 Ibs/cf and

10.5%, respectively. The Construction Quality Assurance(CQA) Plan required that two samples of thesubgrade be tested in the laboratory.

In-place field density testing was conducted on the placed cap subgrade soils at a frequency of 1 test per5,000 cy. In-place density testing was performed using a Troxler nuclear density gage. The subgrade soil

density tests are included in Appendix 5. The field density tests averaged 90.8% of maximum, with anaverage moisture of 10.6%, based on test locations. A total of 17 in-place density tests of the cap subgradesoils was performed during placement. Eight of the tests were used to document that compaction wasachieved. The CQA Plan required that 4 tests be conducted.


4.4 Modifications to the Plan

The final excavation limits were modified, reducing the total quantity of soil that was excavated. Therevised limits of excavation did not affect contaminated soil areas.

4.4.1 Excavation Limits

During initial excavation activities, the limits of excavation in the northwest area of the site were adjustedfrom those shown on the design drawings. The limits shown on the design drawings extended beyond thelimits of contamination based on the additional studies work. As a result, the western and northern limitsof excavation in the northwest area of the site were reduced to reflect the analytical data collected as a partof the additional studies. A letter to the EPA discussing the situation is presented in Appendix 6. Therevised design excavation limits are indicated on Figure 1 (Appendix 2).

4.4.2 Excavation Bottom Contours

The bottom elevations of the excavation were adjusted, as discussed previously, to reflect the elevation ofthe water table at the time of the excavation. The final excavation bottom contours are indicated onFigure 2 (Appendix 2).

4.4.3 Final Cap Subgrade Contours

The final cap subgrade contours were adjusted from the original plan to reflect the smaller quantity ofexcavated soil resulting from the adjustment of the limits of excavation and the higher groundwaterelevation. The final cap subgrade contours are indicated on Figure 3 (Appendix 2).

12/26/96J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS

5.0 EXCAVATION BACKFILL

The excavated areas of the site were backfilled with clean soil from offsite borrow pits.

5.1 Description

The excavated soil areas were backfilled with clean material and graded to the contours indicated onFigure 5, (Appendix 2) Final Contours Record Drawing. In areas where infiltration would occur, MichiganDepartment of Transportation (MOOT) Class II sand was used. A clayey sand was used in areas whereinfiltration was not a consideration. Specifically, MDOT Class II sand was used in the lower areas wherestorm water will collect and infiltrate in the northwest area of the site.

5.2 Soil Characteristics

Backfill soils were obtained from a local borrow pit (Yerington pit). Soils were classified as MDOT ClassII granular material in accordance with MDOT specifications. Material used for backfill in low areas wasobtained from the same source as the drainage layer material.

5.3 Re-excavation of Backfilled Soils

Construction of the c!ay cap necessarily proceeded concurrently with the backfilling of the excavated soils.Because of the unusually heavy rainfall during construction, some erosion of the first lifts of clay led to

silting in the northwest area of the site, after the area had been backfilled. The silting resulted in excessiveponding of runoff in this area of the site. After the clay was covered with the sand drainage layer, theponded water in the low area was pumped down as much as possible such that excavation equipment couldaccess the area. The top two feet of material in the ponded area was then removed and placed outside thelimits of the cap as general fill material. The area was then backfilled with a coarse sand. The grade in thelow area was also increased by approximately five feet from the original plan.

12/26/96J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.MS

6.0 CAP CONSTRUCTION

Cap construction included all activities related to the placement, compaction, and testing of the claymaterial. The clay cap material placement began on July 8, 1996 and was completed on August 9, 1996.A minimum of three feet of clay material was placed over the area to be capped. Approximately 10,000cy of clay material were placed at the site.

6.1 Description

Placement of the clay cap material began in the southern and western portions of the excavated soil capsubgrade and proceeded to the north and east. Clay cap material was transported to the site from a nearbyborrow source (Pelley pit), placed at the appropriate location on the subgrade, and spread in nine-inch liftsusing a Caterpillar D6 bulldozer. Clay cap material compaction was achieved using a sheepsfoot rollerpulled behind the bulldozer. A padfoot roller was initially used, but later substituted by the sheepsfootroller which required less passes of the equipment to achieve proper compaction. Four lifts of clay materialwere placed. Each day's lift of the clay material was tested for density with the Troxler nuclear densitygage.

6.2 Clay Cap Material Testing

Testing of the clay cap material included laboratory testing of the borrow pit material and the placedmaterial, and in-place field density testing using the Troxler.

6.2.1 Laboratory Testing

Borrow Pit Testing

Initially, the source of clay material for the cap was to be the Yerrington Brothers borrow pit located northof the City of Buchanan. This clay material was tested under the United States Soil Classification Systemas a CL clay material with a permeability of less than 1 x 10"7 centimeters per second (cm/sec). However,

it was determined that the volume of clay material was not sufficient for the project needs. A secondborrow source, the Pelley pit, located on Range Line Road, was tested and found to be an excellent qualityclay material with more than adequate volume. The Pelley pit was used as the source of clay cap materialfor the entire project. In accordance with the CQA Plan, this borrow source was tested twice during the

12/26/96 -9-.1: \DGC93\R93 307Q\RA 2REPT. MS

placement of the clay cap material. Testing results indicated that the material was classified as a CL clay,and exhibited permeabilities of 5.6 x 10'8 cm/sec and 2.7 x 10"8 cm/sec. The borrow pit testing results areincluded in Appendix 4.

In-place Testing

A Shelby Tube for permeability testing was collected of the in-place, compacted clay material. Thepermeability of the compacted clay in-place was 3.4 x 10"8 cm/sec. This particular sample indicated that thesoil classification was an SC clay. This classification was likely the result of some subgrade material beingincorporated into the bottom of the sample since the borrow pit material tested as a CL and there was nonoticeable difference in the loads of clay brought to the site and the samples tested from the borrow pit.The in-place clay material testing result is are included in Appendix 4. The CQA Plan required that onein-place permeability test be performed.

6.3 Field Density Testing

In-place field density measurements of the clay cap material were made daily by onsite personnel. The fielddensity test data are included in Appendix 5. If the in-place clay cap material density was not at least 90 %of the maximum dry density, the lift was compacted further until the required compaction was achieved.After each test was completed, the hole was filled with bentonite chips.

Results for all of the density tests performed are included in Appendix 5, including those that did notinitially pass. Passing tests were typically determined at depths of 6 to 10 inches. Because the action ofthe sheepsfoot roller would create voids in the top of the lift, the top 4 to 6 inches of the l i f t generally didnot achieve the required density. A passing test was therefore determined as greater than 90% of themaximum dry density at a depth of 6 inches or greater. The top 4 to 6 inches of a lift was tested after thenext lift was placed and compacted. The total number of final acceptable density tests taken was 27. Thisresults in a frequency of density tests of approximately 1 test per 270 cy of clay cap material placed, orapproximately 6 tests per lift of clay cap material. This also results in an excess of 1 test per day. The CQAPlan required that 1 test be conducted daily. The final density results are presented in Table 1.

12/26/96 - 10 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REFr.JAS

TABLE 1Clay Cap Material

Field Density Testing

Lift

First Lift

Second Lift

Third Lift

Fourth Lift

%ofMaximum

Density(Average)

91.8

91.5

92.8

93.5

%ofMaximum

Density(Individual

Tests)

93.889.291.592.8

90.492.590.892.191.491.8

91.891.191.495.196.292.891.5

91.195.495.095.391.495.692.791.194.193.1

6.4 Surveying and Measurements

A base survey was performed over the extent of the planned cap area after the cap subgrade placement wascompleted. However, it was found that the contractor did not reach appropriate grades along the westernlimit of cap. New grade stakes were set in this area, additional clay material was brought in and placed in

the area, and the area was surveyed again. From both of these surveys, a final subgrade surface drawingwas completed. This drawing is presented on Figure 3 (Appendix 2). A summary of the survey data is

12/26/96: \DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REFr.J AS

11

included in Appendix 7. The final clay survey performed on August 12, 1996, indicated minor cut and fillto attain planned clay grades. The onsite inspector witnessed that the contractor placed clay to the propergrade over the areas indicated as needing additional clay.

Along the southern edge of the cap, the depth of the clay cap material that was placed was uncertain becausethe subgrade had been regraded after the subgrade survey was performed. To confirm the depth of the claycap material in this area, a hand auger was used to bore through the clay cap material to measure its depth.The auger holes were filled with bentonite chips to seal the hole. The measurements showed that the claycap material depth was short by approximately 0.25 feet or less. An additional six inches of clay capmaterial was placed at this location and compacted. Figure 4 (Appendix 2) shows the final clay surface.

12/26/96 - 1 2 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS

7.0 DRAINAGE LAYER

Permeable sand material was placed over the clay cap material to a depth of two feet to protect the claymaterial and aid in drainage. Approximately 7,650 cy of sand was used to construct the drainage layer.

7.1 Description

The MOOT Class n soils for the drainage layer were obtained from the Yerrington pit. The sand materialwas transported to the site, placed at the perimeter of the cap, and spread in 12-inch lifts using a CaterpillarD6 bulldozer.

7.2 Soil Testing

In accordance with the CQA Plan, two samples of the soil used to construct the drainage layer were testedfor permeability and grain size. All of the drainage layer soils met the MOOT specifications for a Class IImaterial. Permeability tests were also performed on the two samples. The tests indicated that the materialhad a permeability of 3 x 10"2 cm/sec and 2.5 x 10"2 cm/sec.

7.3 Surveying

The contractor set grade stakes over the finished clay surface to ensure that 24 inches of sand were placedover the clay material. A survey was performed on August 20, 1996, and grade stakes set indicating finalgrades 28 inches higher than planned clay grades. The contractor adjusted the final sand grade and placedthe final topsoil layer from these stakes.


8.0 TOPSOIL AND SEEDING

Topsoil was spread over the drainage layer in one uniform lift by a bulldozer, then seeded and fertilized.Areas that had been traveled on more heavily by the topsoil haul trucks were broken up by the bulldozerso that the topsoil was in a loose state prior to seeding and fertilizing. A minimum of four inches of topsoilwas spread over the entire site. The entire site was then hydro-seeded with an MOOT roadside mixture ofseed and fertilizer. By the end of October 1996, grass was established over the entire site.

12/26/96 - 14 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPr.JAS

9.0 FINAL SITE WORK

The final site work included the construction of an access road, drainage structures, and fencing. The finalsite contours and features are shown on Figure 5 (Appendix 2).

9.1 Access Road Construction

The perimeter access road was constructed concurrently with the backfilling of the re-excavated low areain the northwest area of the site. MOOT Class II granular material and general fill material were used toconstruct the perimeter access road. Two 12-inch diameter culvert pipes were placed under the access roadto convey drainage from the cap to the infiltration area in the northwest area of the site. The final roadgrades are indicated on Figure 5 (Appendix 2).

9.2 Fencing

Fencing was installed at the location indicated on Figure 5 (Appendix 2), The gate was moved to the northto provide easier access.

9.3 Drainage Swales

Drainage ditches were constructed along the access road to convey drainage to the northwest area of the site.In addition, two drainage swales were constructed to convey runoff from offsite areas in the northwest

corner of the site and from the two culvert pipes under the access road (Figure 5, Appendix 2) The swaleswere lined with rip-rap placed on nonwoven geotextile fabric.


10.0 DECONTAMINATION

The six-wheel articulated haul trucks used to transport contaminated soil were decontaminated uponcompletion of soil excavation. The equipment was located within the limits of the capped area and thensteam cleaned. The bulldozer was decontaminated after the cap subgrade was placed and graded.Decontamination of the clay cap material hauling trucks was not necessary due to the method the contractoremployed to bring clay cap material onto the site. The clay cap material was initially dumped at the edgeof the cap subgrade and the first lift pushed out over the cap area. After the first lift was placed andcompacted, the incoming trucks would travel over the placed clay cap material, never contacting thecontaminated soils.

12/26/96 - 16 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2RliFr.JAS

11.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION

1 This section identifies the organizations that were involved with the RA for the Lagoon Area Soils.

11.1 Organizations and Personnel

; The following organizations and individuals were involved with the Lagoon Soils Remediation project.

i1 EPA Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E.

Remedial Project Manager

! _ CH2M Hill Mr. Jason KrausEPA Oversight Contractor

1 Ms. Erin PottsEPA Oversight Contractor

j Mark IV Audio, Inc. Mr. Ron GrahamOwner Representative

! Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc. Mr. James Susan, P.E./ Project Coordinator

1 Mr. Blake MeinertOnsite Inspector

, Mr. David Conklin, P.E._ Project Engineer

Michigan Earthworks, Inc. Mr. Kim VeilingContractor Project Manager

Mr. Jim Buer1 Contractor Superintendent

11.2 Meetings

A preconstruction meeting was held on May 22, 1996. The agenda for the meeting is included in Appendix} 8. Progress meetings were held on June 6, 1996, June 27, 1996, and July 18, 1996. Progress meeting

minutes are included in Appendix 8.

12/26/96 - 17-J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2RnPT.JAS

11.3 Submittals

The contractor submitted shop drawings for all required items identified in the Project Manual. Shopdrawings or product information were submitted for the corrugated metal pipe, soil erosion controlmaterials, and seed and fertilizer mixtures.

12/26/96 - 1 8 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPTJAS

12.0 PREFINAL AND FINAL INSPECTIONS

The Prefinal Inspection was conducted on August 29, 1996. The Final Inspection was conducted onSeptember 24, 1996. The Prefinal and Final Inspection Reports are included in Appendix 9.

At the time of the Prefinal Inspection, the fence installation was not completed and monitoring wells MW-2,MW-3, and MW-16 had not been reinstalled. The fencing was completed before the Final Inspection wasconducted. The monitoring wells were installed during the week of October 28, 1996.

During the Final Inspection, it was noted that grade stakes needed to be removed from the cap area and"Keep Out" signs needed to be posted on the fence. These items were completed by October 15, 1996,

12/26/96 - 1 9 -J: \DOC93 \R93 307Q\RA 2REKT. JA S

APPENDIX IDAILY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS

Construction Progress ReportLJ Resident Project Representative (daily)t£j Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

V J

Report of job progress and activities. For m-house use only.

Project Name t- ^' /^.\\<*\* J. \U v^ Aâl r\«_U •Contractor f\ ^ \\\ t o. -c \ W \^<^ v: -.

WeatherTemperatureTime onsite 122O

Project No.DateObserver

Routing:Project Mgr MsProject Eng 0File

Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors Carpenters Laborers Other Total

51Subcontractors

SW^-e ^\oV^ ; w\ V> u x v

TQ<U\ tvCvVAK^^tvx V)'O-*;.Vtev^^

AV\c-xx At-C-AÛv/

WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES

\

, ^-- v^ ex ^ûî V <v. S \ Vl

<r v.:^ O

^ C\ •-. P u l l e dC -G

X \ C v C <- A v ' \ \<% V

{use other side for. additional information)

DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS

•Tc^-v

VISITORS A

V022

Fishbcck. Thompson. Carr& Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton « P.O. Box 211 * Ad». Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666

7402 Wcstshirc Drive * Suite 110 • Unsing. Michigan 4S9I7 • (517)627-1141 10/16/92

Project NameContractor

CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTReport of job progress and activities. For in-house use only. -yQ

Project NumberDateObserver

Weather Temperature Time onsite \0 At*.

Labor onsiteContractor/subcontractor Superintcndant Foreman Laborers Other Total

f

Equipment onsiteContractor/subcontractor Equipment Hours Jn use Equipment Hours in use Equipment Hours in use

Work Being Performed:

*,\££%«i«J EVC.,/

-yix**)c

.4> '&* <fg -7^^^^ " '

{continuerl nn hack}

Discussions or Decisions

Major Deliveries

Visitors

W019 4/5/94

j/> So lt^

0

WOI9

Construction Progress Report1 — 1 Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeCi Office Staff

( Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.*— .


Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite •' 3c?


Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors

/ -Carpenters Laborers

Project MgrProject EngFile

Other Total

Subcontractors

/O

tWORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES

{use other side fordditionat information)

P(LE"


VISITORS

Fishbeck. Thompson, Canr & Hubcr. Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 • Ad*. Michigan 49301 (616) 676-2666

r Construction Progress ReportLdRcsiaent Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.

Project Name E V'

Weather Cmoo *JTemperatureTime onsite 1-

Contractor

Project No.DateObservor

Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors; Carpenters Laborers

3


Other

Routing:

Total


Subcontractors

OtJ $1 T& /UO -CMttlU, /*Rft

3/

Pfur c/W*STUMPS OF 5u^/*g QAf*

o? 10 70

t Nifec F&QH KA/KJT. /r A{use other side foradditional infonnation}

So

AV. £S iM^


fif

VISITORSMOO

AH j)

Fishbcck, Thompson. Carr & Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton • P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666

Construction Progress ReportUoResident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

( Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.

Project NameContractor C.H (G

Routing:WeatherTemperature _6Time onsite B


Supervisors^.

Carpenters LaborersContractor's Labor Force


Other3

Total

Subcontractors


/ M

HJfe 6O/L. figHrt/UiM(=i TooFoA- OFT/HAL. DuMP THu &

•u)——•"•o*"'**-i—"*-. •-•» -O Cik

"'\tf\S^.

{use other side foradditional information} M\K!T /S

I A/re&Hm-AioT.

-J V^


VISITORS

Fishbcck, Thompson. Carr & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 * Ada. Michiean 4930! « (616) 676-2666

Construction Progress ReportLaResident Project Representative (daily)I_I Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Repon of job progress and activides. For in-house use only.


Routing:Weather "?TemperatureTime onsite

^ Project No.DateObserver

Supervisors Carpenters Laborers


OtherContractor's Labor Force

Total

Subcontractors

VX

WORK BHNGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES

——————<>——- -V

{use other side foradditional information}


VISITORS

'*—^ •"

Fishbcck, Thompson, Carr & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton • P.O. Box 211 « Ada. Michigan 49301 * (616)676-2666

Construction Progress ReportIi3 Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeC3 Office Staff

Weather «TemperatureTime onsite

-C-..;

Contractor's Labor Force


Project NameContractor V-^A. ^-

Routing;Project No.Date

Observer<- • - * -

Supervisors Carpenters LaborersI


Other Total

Subcontractors

£4.




VISITORS

Fishbcck. Thompson. Canr & Hubcr, inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 » Ada. Michigan 49301 * (616)676-2666

C.

Construction Progress ReportK) Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

J


Project Name ^L\ <g <Jvr^. w r-^ < <a____________Contractor

Routing:Weather fTemperatureTime onsite




Other TotalContractor's Labor Force

Subcontractors

MJL




VISITORS

Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr £ Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton « P.O. Box 211 * Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666

i i Construction Progress ReportC] Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeC3 Office Staff

WeatherTemperatureTime onsite


Report of job progtess and activities. For in-house use only.

Project Name ^.Contractor t-\\

Routing:Project No.DateObserver

Supervisors_ I- - .

Carpenters Laborers


Other Total

Subcontractors


>«rr <L,

^ ^ ^ - \

i {use other side fori idditionai information}


VISITORS

Fishbcck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton « P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 (616)676-2666

627-1141 10/16/92

Construction Progress ReportUS Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeQ Office Staff

V J

Weather "^^ ^^Temperature £^~Timeonsite ^ -. ,0

( Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.

Project Name & \ Contractor ,^\

Project No. ^ *7A.<e -."-?-Date ^ / , ? / « = , cObservor ^ M^^*-\«_.<Jr

dK^sj< -; ^""e --<JU^^v; ^p^o^C^._-*=^S-'S,

Routing:Project MgrProject EngFile

Supervisors Carpenters Laborers Other TotalContractor's Labor Force

Subcontractors

WORK BONGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES



VISITORS c.

Fishbcck, Thompson. Carr &. Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 • Ads, Michigan 49301 « (616)676-2666

Construction Progress ReportUS Resident Project Representative (duly)I—I Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Weather SwTemperatureTime onsite




Routing:Project No. pDate c.Observor

Supervisors/

Carpenters Laborersy


Other Total

Subcontractors


{use other side foradditional information)


VISITORS

Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr &. Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 « Ada, Michigan 49301 (616)676-2666

Construction Progress ReportQ Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff


Project NameContractor JAA ?-A.~£^A^ <^Vs .

Routing:Weather ^TemperatureTime onsite 6:



/Carpenters Laborers


Other Total

Subcontractors


--^^ <. — ^w

(use other side foradditional information}


VISITORS

Fishbeck, Thompson, Can' & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton « P.O. Box 211 * Ad*, Michigan 49301 * (616)676-2666

Construction Progress ReportLj Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeCH Office Staff



Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite


f / /f /<= C.

Cootractor's Labor ForceSupervisors

ICarpenters Laborers


Other Total

Subcontractors


- J

te.—17

"SrTmo- I a———* . ^ .



VISITORS-j

Fishbeck. Thompson, Can- & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666

Construction Progress Report0 Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff






*=? ^- c


Project MgrProject EngFUe

Other Total

Subcontractors


=A



VISITORS

FJshbcck, Thompson. Carr& Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton • P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 « (616)676-2666

Construction Progress Reportfc—t£S Resident Project Representative (daily)

. LJ Project Representative1 D Office Staff

___ __

( Repon of job progress and activities. For m-houso use only.x. ___ _. __________________________________Project NameContractor

Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite •»*%. J^*«-



Project MgrProject Eng


Subcontractors

X

\ WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES

. AX



VISITORS

Fishbeck, Thompson. Carr &. Huber, Inc.6090 Ewt FuKoo - P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 * (616) 676-2666

7402 Wertihire Drive * Suite 110 » Lansing, Michigan 4«917 * (517)627-1141 10/16/97

___i_

•/ ciy

Construction Progress ReportJEO Resident Project Representative (daily)ED Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Weather t-^«»^^--s., *-*-Temperature c. js~ Time onsite \ ?;•. o^.


f Report of job progress and activities. For m-bousc use only.

Project Name ^L% ? ^ -S?T«>Contractor -^ n_ t^-Âc

iV^ Project No. *? 2,lko^ ^"~* Date C./T.'-//->C

Observor -$., ' y-î^^vx^^'C

Supervisors Carpenters Laborers/ _ V

o^^^_ "ôlA«rf^^;«^^^ . v ~~-sX~--^<a>s^ v

Routing:Project MgrProject EngFUe

Other Total

Subcontractors

WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DEUVERIES

Vc^-^k.



VISITORS

von

Fishbeck. Thompson, Carr &. Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fuhon • P.O. Box 211 • A<1», Michigan 49301 » (616)676-2666

7402 Wcstihire Drive « Suite 110 * Uiuing, Michigvn 4*917 * (517)627-1141 £0/16^2

Construction Progress ReportBu Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff





Project No.Date

Observor

Supervisorsi

Carpenters Laborers


Other Total

Subcontractors

* "=




VISITORS

V022

Fishbeclc. Thompson, Carr & Hubcr, Inc.6090 Eut Fulton * P.O. Box 211 • Ad«, Michigan 49301 ' (616)676-2666

74O2 Wcstxhire Drive • Suhe 110 • Lansing, Michigan 48917 • (517) 627-1141 10/16/92

Construction Progress Reporth£! Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Report of job progress and activities. For in-bouso use only.

Project Name SEL;Contractor t-A_\<. -;

^l-fr**^--

Routing:Weather <TemperatureTime onsite



/ __Carpenters Laborers


Other Total

Subcontractors

IA.V



•S Z^TOO


VISITORS

vozz

Ftshbcck, Thompson. CMT& Huber. Inc.6090 Eut Fuhoo • P.O. Box 211 • Ad», Mtclugtn 49301 * (616) 676-2666

7402 Wiltshire Drive " Suite L10 • Laming, Michigw 48917 * (517) 627-1141 tO/16/97

Construction Progress Reportj-" iE$J Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Report of job progress and activities. For in-iiouso use only.


-V- «—

R outing;WeatherTemperatureTime onsite

i- Project No. <=jDate <•Observor




Other ToUi

Subcontractors

TV ;


j—^""v "a-o- .



VISITORS

von

FUhbeck. Thompson, CWT & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fuhon * P.O. Box 211 « Ada, Michigan 49301 *

7402 Wouhirc Drive » Suite 110 * Lanaing. Michigan 4«937 *676-2666

627-1141 IOM6/92

Construction Progress ReportJ3 Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Report of job progress and activities. For m-bouse use only.

Project Name SE_Contractor


Project No.Date

Observor

Project Mgr

iM.

Contractor's labor ForceSupervisors

/Carpenters Laborers Other Total

Subcontractors


•• Y*-"L-*-"*-'vx


fr"**-^——-}——g -*—-—-^.«^^VV^ . <L«ws^=-T- ^

^T


VISITORS

von

Fishbcck, Thompson. CarrA Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 » Ad*, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666

74O2 Wcrtihire Drive • Suite 110 • L&iuuig, Michigvi 4«9l7 • (517)627-1141 10/16/91

^J

LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff J

l /~C* -/ - • ————'—- --• -————————'——Report of job progress and activities. For in-bouso use ooJy.

Kesideot Frojecl Represenutive (cUily^ "~~~Project NameContractor -\U- -

WeatherTemperatureTimeomite

Project No. f=~ «=? 31s3:JR.Routing;

DateObservor

?- / / /<; c:

Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisor*


._r__


Other TotaJ

Subcontractors

WORK BEING^•RFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES ^i t ^*r^jr~*.


USCUSSIONS orPHdSIONS

ilTORS

Fiihbcdc, Thomptott. Cur & Mubcr. loc.6090 Eut Fukoo * P.O. Box 221 * Ada, Michigan 49301 '•> (616) £76-2666

7402 WertihMo Drive * Suite 110 * Uottoff, Michtgui «9S7 » (517)627-1141

Si Resident Project Represenutive (daily)D Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

i Report ot job progress and activities. For in-house use only.

Project Name vE, \J ^^T^,\ ^ ~^<=*——•a.-^J.^^A'?^-Contractor ^-A,\ c W ^^r--^^-_^^rNi>>^ s.

Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite &:


Supervisor* Carpenters Laborers


Other TotalComractor's Labor Force

Subcontractors




VISITORS

von

Fishbcdc, Thompton, Cmrr & Hubcr, Jn«.€090 But Fukoa * P.O. Box 211 « Ada, MkJiigin 49301 * (616)676-2666

7402 Westihire Drive » Suite MO • Laminf, Midugin 44917 * (517)617-1141 1WI6A2

Construction Progress ReportLS Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Report of job progress and activities. Fox m-bouso use only.


"^<^ c ... r-

Routing:WeatherTemperature ?.,<-^Time onsite s- - A *~


o

Supervisor Carpenters Laborers


OtherContractor's Labor Force

Total

Subcontractors

fr-l \

MAJOR DELIVERIESdo* ..

' V

{use other side toradditiQDal information} ^ ^^ JP


VISITORS

von

Ftshbtck, Thompton, Carr & Huber, lac.6090 East Fulton <• P.O. Box 211 * Ada, Michigan 49301 « (616) 676-2666

7402 Weatitorc Drive * Suite 110 * Laniing, Michigtn 49917 * (517)627-1141 10/16^92

PSJ Resident Pfoject Representative (duly)LJ Project RepresentativeQ Office Staff

^Project NameContractor

progress aura activities, hor m-bouso use only.

Routing;WeatherTemperatureTime onsite

,\ Project No. "^DateObserver

Supervisor* CarpentersContractor's Labor Force

Laborers- V


Other ToUl

Subcontractors

*^ rt f~r --1 --

WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DEUVERIES



AAV

.JL

VISITORS

von

FUhbecfc, Thompson. C*rr & Huber. Inc.6090 Eut Fukoa • P.O. Box 211 • Ad», MicKigui W301 • (616)676-2666

7402 Westihire Drive • Suite 110 • Laming. Michigan 48917 • (517)627-1141

, BY GJ27 JUNlEXC.

07/08/96 13:52 TX/RX NO. 0140 POJ

Construction Progress ReportSi Resident Project Representative (daily)U Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

— f / t O

Report of job progress and activities. For in-bouso use only.


Routing;WeatherTemperatureTime oruite

T^g"

en • ca-*»_

Project No,Date

Observor

Cootnctor's Labor ForceSupervison



Other ToUi

Subcontractors

Nt 1 E


Jr.

<=-l — .



VISITORS

von

FUhbcdc, Thompson. Carr & Kuber, Inc.6090 But FuKoa * P.O. Box 211 « Ada, Miehigu 49301 • (616)676-2666

7402 Westihire Drive * Suite 110 • Uiuinf, Midiigwt 4*917 • (517)627-1141

Resident Project RepresentativeLJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

^ixc^mi 01 juu progress «na activities, i-oir o&~bouse use only.


J

Routing:

TemperatureTime onsite



vCarpenters Laborers

I


Other Total

Subcontractors

WORK BEING>ERFORMED and

MAJOR DELIVERIES ——

"* {use other side for'' additional information}


VISITORS y_-^-e-

vori

Ftihbecfc, Thompton. Carr & Hubcr, lac.609O Eut Futtoa * P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Mkhigtn 49901 » (616)676-2666

7402 Wertihire Drive • Suite 110 • Lannnj, Michigwi 4«917 » (517)627-1141 10/16^92

Construction Progress ReportPC) Resident Project Representative (duly)tJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

f Report of job progress and activities. For m-bousa use only-


Routing:WeatherTemperature <^r^Time onsite /^ : <^


Project No. /:Date ?y /zObserver -7^



Other Total

Subcontractors


4- <r^.

-t*\-


v •

* ~A * *m~.


VISITORS

vort

FUhbeclc. Thompson. Our & Huber, Inc.6090 E*st Fwtoo • P.O. Bon211 - Ad», Michigtn 49301 • (616) $76-2666

7402 Westahire Drive • Suite 110 • Uniioe, Miidugin «917 • (5I7)6r7-I141

Construction Progress Report12 Resident Project Representative (duly)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Report of job progress and activities. For io-bouse use only.


\f ,-. 0...- N_,-

tflhlllU

Routing:Weather - .Temperature <=^-Timeonsite //: g.

Project No.

Observer




Subcontractors

C V\ NK-

'ORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES

i ••• - _ c^ <r jCuf v^Vrg^v.


•v

i DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS

VISITORS

van

FUhbcck, Thompton, Carr ft Hubcr, Inc.6090 E*it Fukofl * P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Michigan 49301 " (616)676-2666

7402 Wertihire Drive • Suite 110 » Uiwuj, Michigan 49917 * (517)627-1141

UU Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

i num **-« vines, riM to-OOUSO UUSC


^ V „ y.

Weather _:TemperatureTime onsite

Project No.D{Ue

Observor

Routing:

Supervisor* CarpentersContractor's Labor Force

LaborersZ.


Other TolaJ

Subcontractors

Al

WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES <^ .'

A —,^ \ ;

{use other side foradditional information) V__.


VISITORS

VOQ

Fwhbeck, Thompson. CJUT & Huber, Inc.6090 Eut Fukoa • P.O. Box 111 * Ada, Michigu 49301 * (616) 676-2666

7402 Wertihire Drive * Suite 110 » Laniing, Michigui 48917 * (517) 627-1141

Construction Progress Report|S Resident Project Representative (duty)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

... ...._7._ ._,—-..——————————————————I Report of job progress and activities- For m-houso use only.



Project No.1)416

Observor

Supervisor! Caipcnten Laborers


Other Total

Subcontractors

Ul 7

YORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES ._ _fl

. \


kj /v <—i\x—'


VISITORS

von

Fishbcdc, Thompton. Our &. Hubcr. lac.6090 Eut Fukoa * P.O. Box 211 * Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616) 676-2666

7402 Wotihire Drive • Suite 110 * Luubr, Michigan 4*»17 » (517)627-1141 W16/93

[U Resident Project RepneseaQ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Weather \2^_iv-Temperature <^,v"~'Time onsite (c, —^

Cootractor's Labor Force

tvcyui i 1 Keport as joo progress Midtative (daily) n . . _

Project Name v \j - ^ • .Contractor j^v \ *£ c

_y

Project No. fr^ <^'^^^- <^,Date ^y f ^ ^ c, H •?-/•<Observor ~^ Vi,^^ ^, t- '

Supcrvison Carpenters Laborers

activities- For in-bousa use only.

V-^ ^^> <^^\r^k^-

Routing:Project Mgr ___ _____

, Project Eng ___

Other Tola]

)

Subcontractors

WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES __^^l

•7——-• * Q



VISITORS

VC22

FUhbeck, Thompton, CJJT & Huh*r, Inc.6090 East Futon * P.O. Bojc211 • Ad», Mkhigin ^9301 * (616) €76-2666

7402 Wotiture Drive " Suite 110 • Laiuing, Mi^ui «917 * (517) 677-1141

Construction Progress ReportPI Resident Project RepresenUtiveCD project RepresentativeD Office Staff


f Report of job progress and activities. For in~botuo use only.

Project NameContractor ^5 "f-

Routing:*=,?Project No.

DateObservor ^ VA .<*L .



\Caipenters Laborers Other Total

SubcontractorsJ 0

VORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES

a. .raE~- reX VA\K \~-\L- .-^W JW



VISITORS

von

Fishbecfc. Thompwn, Cur & Huber, lac.609O E«t Fultoa « P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Michtgu 49301 • (616)676-2666

7402 WoUhiTe Drive " Suite 110 • Lwuinj, Midiigw 48917 » (517)627-1145! 1W1W97

__- 1—

Construction Progress Report0 Resident Project Representative (daily)ED Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

L - / /. / *e"-"Report of job progress and activities, Fof m-hotue use only.

Project Name _Contractor

Routing:Weather rTemperatureTime onsite



\Carpenters Laborers


Otber Total

Subcontractors

C_\\


V.'. < r v .

/ e- >

i ^V*-*-


-vr---Jx~ ~


\e -

a <.!--.

VISFTORS

von

Fiahbeck. Thompson. Carr &. Huber. loo.6090 Ewt Fukoo • P.O. BoK 211 « Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616) 676-2666

74O2 Wertxture Drive - Suite 110 * Luubif* MilJiigtn «917 * (517)627-1141

LJ Resident Project Representative (daily)ED Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

^__ZHI1:Project NameContractor

. roar m-ftouso use onJy.






Subcontractors


A iM.

NJT

\; --JL (

{use other side forinformatkm}

DISCUSSIONS orDEQSIONS

VISITORS

, Thompson. Cwr & Hubcr. Inc.6090 Eut Fukoo * P.O. Box 211 • Ad», Michigui 49301 • (616) 676-26fi6

7402 WesUhirt Drive » Suite 110 * Laminy, Michigw 4»17 » (317) «Z7-U41

Construction Progress Reportg Resident Project Reprcseouuve (d*Uy)Project Representative

D Office Staff

Report of job progress and activities. Foe m-bouce use only.

Project Name J^jContractor


Cootractor's Labor Force


/ g..<r-



Other ToUi

Subcontractors


{use other side foradditional Information}


VISITORS

FUhbcdc. Thompson. Cmrr Sc, Huber. loc.6090 East Fukoa - P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, MkhigMi 49301 • (616) CT6-2666

74O2 Weatihire Drive » Sukc 110 * LtuuinE, Mictugtn 48917 » (317) 677-1141 J.0/!6y92

Construction Progress Report£3 Resident Project Representative (duly)D Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

V. ———————

Weather <L_^^~Temperature *^— > **Time onsite <=T; <,-,

J

( Report of job pn 7 "- V 71°ogress «£id activities. For in-houso use only.

Project Name ^y'_ c^- Oa^^^A-t-^-t^ ^Contractor ^^

Project No. /— *>.v^cDate Y=/e-£-./?Observor ^A/V- C-<

\ ?r-j-vU_rx^V^Routing:

3^1 g^ Project Mgr-^ Project Eng*> ,-..-. irt" File __ _ _ _ . _ _ .

Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors Caipentexs Laborers Other Total

Subcontractors

_/ORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DEUVERIES



VISITORS

vora

FUhbeck, Thompson. CWT & Huber. Inc.6090 East Fulton - P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 " (616)676-2666

7402 Wertihire Drive • Suke 110 * Luuuif. Michigui 48917 * (517)627-1141

Construction Progress ReportJ3 Resident Project Representative (daily)D Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Weather ^TemperatureTime onsite


Report of job progress and activities, fos in-bouso use only.


Routing;Project No.Date =?-/Observor -^



Other Total

Subcontractors


o,\

i /

uc^—CA^*»

/

O-i gJ^

—c :^_ \ v{use other side foradditional information}

\ ~ -——

L \7TJ


VISITORS

vora

Fishbecfc, Thompion. Cwr & Huber. Inc.6090&wtFuHoQ « P.O. Box 211 * Ada, MicKigut 49301 • (616) S76-26fi6

7402 Wutxhirc Drive » Suite 110 * Uoriaf, Mirfugin 48917 » (517) 62T-1141 ion 6/91

Resident Project Representative (dajjy)Q Project RepreaeoUtiveD Office Staff

i u* juu pugg-ess ana activities, hor in-Oouso use

Project NameJ

ContractorRouting:


Project No.Date

Observor


ICupenten Laborers

\


Other TotaJ

Subcontractors

WORK BEINGERFORMED and

MAJOR DELIVERIES

'{use other side foradditional information)

3> <^U_^ £^= £> •»«•-* C* .


TP_

vou

FUhbeck, Thompion. Cur & Huber, lac.6090 E«st Fukoo * P.O. Box 211 - Ad*, Michtgui 49301 » (616) CT6-2666

7402 Wertihire Drive - Suite 110 » Lansine, Michigut 48917 " (Si'7) 627-1141

Construction Progress ReportE2 Resident Project Representative (daily)D Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

„Report of job progress and activities- For in-bouso use only.




Cootracior's Labor ForceSupervisor!

\Carpenters Laborers


Otber Total

Subcontractors

\ \

WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES V C^T-v

\

(use other side foraddittonai inrbrmation} V

C_


VISITORS : vv

Fishbeck, Thompion, Carr & Hubcr, lac.6090 E*st Fulton * P.O. Box 211 - Ada, MichigMi 49301 • (616) CT6-2666

7402 W«st»hire Drive » Suite 110 » Unsinj. Mi.dugtn «917 * (317)627-1141 10/16/93

Resident Project Representative (daily)Project RepresentativeOffice Staff

oujy.


J



Project No. \rrDateObserver

Supervisors1

Carpenters Laborers

Project MgrProject EngHie

Other ToiaJ

Subcontractors

\\


.UJL



r?-.VISITORS

V032

Fishbecfc, Thompwn. C*rr & Hubcr, Inc.6090E«tFultoa • P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Mkhigin 4SJ01 * (616)576-2666

7402 Wauhire Drive • Suite 110 • Unsinf, Midiigtn 4W17 * (517)627-1141

Construction Progress ReportJ3 Resident Project Representative (daily)D Project RepresentativeQ Office Staff

-**• , - uReport ot job progress mad activities. For m-bouso use only.

Project Name _SContractor

Routing;Weather *TemperatureTime onsite


Supervison CarpentersContractor's Labor Force

Laborers\


Other TolaJ

Subcontractors

CJ^V T


d\^~ ^ g= ..



VISITORS

Fishbecfc, Thompton. Cur & Hufacr. Inc.6090 Eut Fuboa * P.O. Box 211 * Ada, Michigan 49301 * (616)676-2666

V072 7402 Westihire Drive • Suite 110 » Lajuing, Michigin 49917 * (517)627-1141

ContractorRouting:

WeatherTemperatureTimeoniitE


Svpenrison CarpentcnContractor's Labor Force

Laborers_ . l_. .


Other ToUl

Subcontractors

WORK BEING &/&,

MAJOR DEUVEWES *a*-rrv,

£*.

T

{use other side faradditional information) c: \

TV. Ots V

\.

\^-^ V

p\


-VISITORS

von

Ftabbwk. Thoonp»on. Cur A. Hubcr. Inc.609O East Futtoa * P.O. Box 211 • Ad*. Mwhigui 49N1 * (616) 6763666

7402 WcsuKms Drive • Suite 110 * Luufef. Michigan 4W17 » (Jl7> 627-II4A MV1&91

CoatractorRouting:

Weather STemperatureTimeonsite


Supervisors Carpenters

Project Mgrc Project Eng

Other

Ubor F«te

Subcontractors

Tolal


c-\- -

-i -i

-N* -S_ -TV.__A- ^TTTT^A-\V -J-*

{use other sida foradditional

^ -^

Us.


> . o.s.

'——*"*T

visrroRs

Futbbwfc. Thompson. Cw A Uubcr. Jno,4090 E*it Fubm * P.O. Bos 211 * Ada, Mic&gui 4>,M* • (616)

74Q2 Wcatxhn Drivtt • Sufte 110 » UnHnj. M14u|*a 4«91? * (517)627-1141

Construction Progress Report|^S Resident Project Reprcsenuuve (daUy)CU Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

Report of job progress and activities. For m-bousa use only.


^^jCET^r . :Nr^


Project No, /

Observor -

Routing:



Otber TotalContractor's Labor Force

Subcontractors

PERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES

JSest

>*- »-a f~~t


i-c:

A. r-«i*-_

"r—^DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS_______H c

At,

VISITORS

Fishbecfc, Thompwn. Cvr &. Hubcr. Inc.609O E«t Fultoo • P.O. BOK 211 * AiU, Michigui 49301 * (616) CT6-2666

V022 7402 Wertihire Drive * Suite 110 • Luuinff. Midugin 48917 • <517) 627-1141

Construction Progress Report2 Resident Project Repn=scDUUve (daily)PI Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

I Repent af job progress and activities, foi in-bouso use ooJy-

Project Name JE^V s ^^^Contractor »^ t -^,_ ^i_u. .- —^^

-t*-i £lJto»^K.


°SoProjeaNo.DateObservor

Coatractor's Labor ForceSupervisors

(Carpenters Laborers

/


Other ToUJ

Subcontractors

<r a


f



VISITORS

von

Fwhbeck, Thompton. CMT & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton • P.O. Box 211 « AoX Michigmn 49301 • (616) 676-2666

7402 Wcatihire Drive - Suite 110 • Unnne, Michigiin «917 * (517)627-1141

Project NameContractor MA I^AIZTM-U

CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTReport of job progress and activities. For in-housc use only.

Project NumberDate g/HObserver

Weather Temperature Time onsite

Labor onsiteContractor/subcontractor Supcrintendant Foreman

J.Laborers Other Total

Equipment onsiteContractor/subcontractor Equipment Hours in use Equipment Hours in use Equipment

Work Being Performed:f

Hours in use

{continued on hack}

Discussions or Decisions

Major Deliveries

Visitors

W019 4/5/94

Project Representative (dajjyj

I ) Project RepresentativeD Office Staff

ULUJ •

Project Name x^ \j _- c

Contractor


j^~XProjectNo.Date g,Observer


Supervisors CarpentersCoatrtcior's Labor force

LaborersI

Other TotaJ

Subcontractors

WORK BHNGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES

s: -

-e-T>LC_«rL_O •

A



VISITORS

St Vt*

V072

Fishbeck, Thompion. C*rr & Hubcr. Inc.609O E*rt Fulioa • P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Mkhigtn 49301 • (616)576-2666

7*02 Watihire Drive " Suite 110 « Laming. Michigtn «917 » (317)627-1141

LAJ Xesideoi r^ojeci ^Lprsiseo2_r*fZ3 Project ReprescotatjveD Office Staff

Weather -^~^-A *\_Temperature ^ -^- —Time orisite ?V=^E=

Cootrsctor's Labor Force

Project NameContra ctor

^-^^ Project No. "y_\g:Date &^LuObservor ^§,\M]

Supervisors Carpenters

v '" \ / --" r-^ 'L f-^ V

h-v. -~ ^Ro«tiog^

,^V ^j Project Mgr/^^___ Project Eng

/ \ v***i4^'^^rV F"e

Laborers Other Total

Subcontractors

C

WORK BEINGPERFORMED and

DELIVERIES. ^ x ^ - ^c -

V^c^t

ix ~~^J

^ •



I VISITORS~>-S -

von

Fishbeck, Thompion. C»n: & Hubesr. Inc.6090 Eut Futtoa « P.O. Box 211 • AiU, MkOtigu 49301 • (616)

7402 Wesuhire Drive B Suite 110 » Lannaj. Michig«i -«917 * (517) 627-2141

........ . _Ljf Project RepresentativeQ Office Staff

Project Name ^VA"

TemperatureTime onsite

_y

Project No, r=DateObservor

Routing:

vc

Supervisor* CarpentersCootricior's Labor Force

LaborersI

Project MgrProject BugFile

Other TofcU

Subcontractors

WORKBHNGPERFORMED andMAJOR DEUVERIES --^ ?^ //CL

"^TV a_*L<e_ V ~

_^\V

.A %X -vl-Cv{use other side foradditionai information) \ V

t"—————

JSa.

f V^r

DISCUSSIONS orDEaSIONS

VISITORS

von

Fishbedc, Thompton. C*n" & Wubcr. Inc.609O E*at Fukoo * P.O. BOJC 211 • AtU, Michigui 49301 * (616)676-2666

7402 Wauhtre Drive * Suite 110 * Unsinf, Michigan 4S917 » (517) £27-1141 10/J6/92

Projeci RepresenUUve (daily)

Project RepresentativeOffice Staff

Weather ^TemperatureTime onsite


Project NaoieContractor

Project No

Observer

Supervisorst

Carpenters Laborers


Other

Subcontractors

Tolal

jy^

WORK BEINGPERFORMED and^vIAJOR DELIVERIES

•I_j

Q » \

i {use other side for, additional information}

•C2-0Q- •-'

DISCUSSIONS orDEaSIONS

;: VISITORS

vozi

Fbhbedc. Thompson. Cair & Huber. Inc.6090 East FuHoo » P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigmn 49301 » (616)576-2666

7402 Westihire Drive - Suite 110 • Lanjonf, Michigmn 4«917 • (517)627-1141

Resident Project RepresentsUvc (ckiJy)\/LJ Project Representative

D Office Staff

mix*, i ut m-mxiso use onjy.



Project No,

Observer


Supervisors Carpenters Laborers OtherContractor's Labor Force

Total

Subcontractors


{use other side foradditional information} ^ga—>^x


VISITORS 1 n

V022

Fishbeck, Thompton* Cur & Kubcr, lac.6090 BMA Fultoo • P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666

74O2 Wcatjhire Drive « Suite 110 • Unsinp. Miidugtn «917 • (517)627-1141

DM& \2fta/iu nut;_.i:.L"_g" uspt

mc7>oono

mxo

o

ELECTRO-VOICE SUPERFUND SITEBUCHANAN, MICHIGAN

LAGOON SOILS REMEDIATION

fishbeck, thompson, carr Sc huberengineers • scientists • architects

Grand Rapids * LansingMichigan

DS/IHINO INTO a3MTO\CO\3i07Qa03 DATE: 12/20/8S TIME: 1:30 pm UgH: 5C


LAGOON SOILS REMEDIATION fr<>h fishbeck, thompson, carr & huberengineers • scientists " architects

Grand Rapids • lansingMichigan

FINAL CLAY SUBGRADE RECORD DRAWING

na*i«ng iHFCr tuo?a\cn\jjoToa<tt O*IE n/ie/ie TIME a a» pm usm so

NOR

^ !

PRCkECT HQ 1

933D7Q

|


LAGOON SOILS REMEDIATION

£ 1— fishbeck, thompson, carr & huberTli^rJl engineers * scientists • architectsJ-J-lT^XX Grand Rapids • Lansing

Michigan

,F>,(.

APPENDIX 3SEPTAGE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Report Date: 08/01/96Lab Number: 960700637Date Received: 07/29/96Client ID: 60688

Electro-Voice600 Cecil StreetBuchanan MI 49107

Attention: Mr. Ron Graham

Sample ID: Septic Sludge07/01/96F93307Q, COC No: 5974

Method: EPA 8260A

Notes: Results reported with the "U" flag indicate the parameter wasanalyzed for but not detected in the sample above the detectionlimit. Reported with the detection limit.

Parameter Result Units Analysis Date

1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2 -Trichloroethane1, 1-Dichloroe thane1, 1-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1 , 2 -Dichlorobenzene1, 2-Dichloropropane1 , 3 -Dichlorobenzene1 , 4 -Dichlorobenzene2-ChloroethylvinyletherAcetoneBenzeneBromodichlorome thaneBromome thanecis-1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 3-DichloropropeneChlorobenzeneCarbon TetrachlorideBromoformChloroformChloroethaneChlorome thaneCarbon DisulfideDibromochlorome thaneEthylbenzeneMethyl Butyl KetoneMethylene ChlorideMethylethylketoneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneTetrachloroetheneStyrenetrans-1 , 2-Dichloroethenetrans-1 , 3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene

21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U65021 U21 U84021 U

110021 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 021 U5621 U36110 U21 U

360110 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U

ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

07/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/96

analytical services

Lab No 960700637

Parameter Result Units Analysis Date

Trichlorof luorome thaneTolueneVinyl ChlorideVinyl AcetateXylenes

21 U79021 U21 U180

ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

07/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/96

Other compounds detected above 20 ug/kg: n-propylbenzene; 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene; 1,2,4-trlmethylbenzene; 1,2, 4-trichlorobenzene;napthalene; cyclohexanes.

Additional Information:

Results should be considered as estimated due to improper samplecontainer and storage conditions. Sample was received by lab after theEPA recommended hold time for analysis. Although retained underrefrigeration prior to delivery to lab, the sample may have beencontaminated by other materials also stored in that location.

:inalvtical services

APPENDIX 4

GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY RESULTS

onsultants. 9661 6 I NflDATE' 6-7-96

PROJECT

CLIENTCONTRACTOR

ENGINEER/ARCHITECT

693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505.PHONE (616) 456-5469 - FAX (616) 456-5784 l

Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck. Thompson, Carr and Huber

SOIL DESCRIPTION- Dark brown fine to coarse SAND; little gravel, little clay

MAX. DENSITY: 124.5 LBS/CU.FT.' OPTIMUM MOISTURE 10.5 PCT

ORIGIN OF SAMPLE: _Near grid node 5

LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER

PREPARATION PROCEDURE.

119

82696 TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM D 1557, PROCEDURE A

MOIST OVERSIZE CORRECTION ASTM D4718

117

115

113

i

11 13 15 17

REMARKS:

MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT)

" The maximum density and optimum moisture content were corrected for 16.8 % oversizematerial retained on the No. 4 sieve per ASTM D 4718.

TESTED 6Y: Doug Hula

Dislnbution 1 -Michigan Earthworks -Mr Kirn Veiling

REVIEWED BY:

T-f'Shbeck, n. Carrie Huber-Mr Jim Susan p

T/»S report has been prepared lor the e*clus<ve use of the cl,ent and any part.al or v.hole reproduction w,thout the consent of She r//em ,sprohibited

YERINGTONAGGREGATE

CONSTRUCTÎNSPECTION REPORT

Specification

ispectt

atft Sa

ata Te

^ / yr (, u/Dn\ { AÂ— .«d

w (f^TuJ^ ^//y] l/TU/ll/li/S^Sai

mpl«ri / &tfX J\O Prc

ntcd / O&} "" / {i/ , , f^n

urc* of Materia

tipled From _^

xluced

ntracto

t lnt«wtediJ«« ( S^J-l-

?>£ fids ^M. r\(]W JWIMZfly / / /// /_ Raquimir

r

wntt.

SPECIFICATIONS6A

;

10095-100

30-60

~o*~

20AA

100

95-1000640

45-661

0-10-2.S^9

»*Sp«C(MS

2040

0-7

40%

20A

100

6&86

40-60

20-35

0-7

28X

206

100

6040

4O«5

2040

2-10

fci- — -nonv

20C

10080-100

65-06

3O«0

15-40

0-10

22A

10090-100

66-85

30-50

44

25%

23A

100

60-8S

2540

9-16

26A

10095-10060-0010300-12

0-30-50-6

0-695%

31A

1000&-10035450-36

03040-5

0-1595%

2NS

10095-10066-0636-7520-5610-300-10

0-3

3CS

10096-10070-9545-7526-6515-3S0-10

0-5

^W

100

4E45

2&«&

5-30

0-5

"IT100

60-100<i

<

0-30

0-7"

SIEVE OPENING3" Sim*2-1/2" Sim2"Stwi1-1/2" Siwt

"sUi1 .t

No. 4 St«wN0.8&4V.No. 16 Sl«v*No.30SltMNo. 50 Stov*No. lOOSwvt

N 200«SMÂ

TO

TA

L PE

RC

ENT

PA

SS

ING

LoMByWMhlngSoft PfciWwSum of Soft P*rt. ft CtwrtIncrutttd PitrtidMThin or Efort. PvtlctHCrwfwd MrarW-Mln.

It is C-<--tijQA ^1_ —-

— -•Specif icati

Initial Wai it of SvnpN ^ f

Wtiflht Afttr Wnhing ~}~

P«ifl0No.2001el.y&»ltt ^

Httatned Fractional

WtlDht

^s.OOO . <2OO o*:>

1 *Ôi? -6>ff^-?"cto-5'JolCa.^

0"^^w^^-'' tS" f . (O

^ ^. J5

SO. 2-

-I _

F*trc*nt

O. /--iD- O<>-O

f 14.TS-4K.^S5.^Lio_3

Itfjf Gf*

></ r" u'r1)n.2- ' Gmi

PtrcenU CumuUtiv*

R«t«n«d

O.Oo- O0,0

*f • ^r*i.*2.0^4.2,5^.G»1<? y^?| 1îA./DA

o« . IV

Passing

, JQO1 O*i

/ t\t}£&&•<%

<^<~~

..SO

U£>2/)-JLci

"out Accunulatcd Cydt. to D*w

'Onsultants ;,c693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE {616} 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784

TO Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber6090 East FultonAda, Michigan 49301

DATE

ATTENTION

RE:

6/18/96Jim Susan,

JOB NO. X0271P/E.

ElectrovoiceLaboratory Soil Tests

WE ARE SENDING YOU |~>T| Attached |~ | Under separate cover via the followinq items:

I | Test Boring Logs | | Prints f | Plans | | Samples | | Specifications

| | Copy of letter | | Data Sheets |"x~| Test Reports

S'

COPIES DATE

6/17/96

NO.

2

DESCRIPTION

Grain Size Distribution Test Reports

nTHESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:

I | For approval I I Return

| X | For your use

| X | As requested

[ | For review and comment

REMARKS

corrected prints

;OPY TO X0271SIGNED _____.."• ——— r* f ..•^.M * -r.-

Peter J/JohnsonLaboratory Manager

If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

onsultants.INC.693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784

PROJECT NO.:DATE:

SHEET:

X027'6-10-96

OF

PROJECT

CUENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT

Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck. Thompson. Carrand Huber

WEATHER: Cloudy LOW TEMP. F: 70 HIGH TEMP, F: 70

ft—-

Type of Test Taken:

Samples of soils were obtained.

Worfc Areas:

The soil excavation at the west end of the Electrovoice Building in Buchanan was in progress.

Remarks, Problems & Solutions:

A trip was made to the Yerington Brothers brown pit #14-64, north of Buchanan. The purpose was toinvestigate the potential use of ciay soils at this pit for the project at the Electrovoice site. The excavator hadprepared five test holes in the area which were expected to have cohesive soil appropriate for use. Under thedirection of FTC&H representative Dave Conklin, samples were obtained from the test pit areas of ciay soil. Atthe time of obtaining the samples, a decision was yet to be made if any of these soils would be used, since thequantity was relatively small and availability difficult because of overlying depths of non-usable material.

Soil visible in test pits:

Test pit #2: 0-2' topsoil mixed with silty clay; 2-8' light brown silty clay, trace sand (bag samplerecovered); 8-10' brown sand, trace clay.

Test pit #4: 0-3' topsoil and clay mixture; 3-7' sandy, silty clay; 7-1V light brown silty clay (bagsample recovered).

Appropriate personnel on-sfte were informed of test results

Appropriate personnel were not present on-srte lo receive test results

TESTED BY: Scott Zeeryp REVIEWED BY:

Distribution (l)-Mtchigan Earthworks-Mr Kim Veiling (l)-Fishbeck. Thompson. C.irr and Huber-Jim Susan. P E

Tr-.ts report has been prepared for (he exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client isprohibited

o;uz:i—iu.

100

90

80

70

60

z: 50u

LJ 40Q_

30

20

10

200 100 10,3 1.0 0.1GRflIN SIZE - mm

0.81 0. 001

X +3" GRAVEL SAND 5ILT CLAY0.0 0.5 ^4.6 38.2 36.7

LL PI DBS0. 176 0.0136 0.0029

MflTERIflL DESCRIPTION uses RfiSHTO

* Lean c l a y w i t h sand CL

Project No.: X0271Project: Electrovoice• Location: Test Hole No.4 Bag, 9' depth

Date: 6-17-96

G R f l I N SI2E D I S T R I B U T I O N TEST REPORT

M^TERIRLS TESTING CONSULTflNTS

Remarks:

tloisture Content = 16

F ig . No

•

•

100

80

70

LJ

5 60U-

z: 50u

Ld 40D_

30

20

10

020

Pfbit

c

or

?PTN ^TT^F HTCTTPTFIS ITTflN TF^T PFPHPTxMJLST CD J_ L. C- 1_J JL ,3 1 rxJLlJLJ 1 JLwl i 1 C_CJ S rvLLr^^lIx 1

c c c;- (\j - -^ « ^-

C C \ t: CJ CJ— « — T^ — » ^" t\J CO Q ^ dO ^ T G J

\ X \ . X " 1 ~ • - * f1-! T < J > " - " M(Tl CO --H *-< pi v4 CO * ••• ** • * • * - * * •

0

. ' — * •_ **

!

;

:

\

* «*

;

:

k

H

:

1

I SSSS\s^ v

Sk\^

100 10.0 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001GRRIN SIZE - mm

X +3"0.0

LL

24

X GRAVEL2.0

X SflND23.4

X SILT42.8

y. CLAY31.8

PI

10DBS

0.209

D60 ^500.0172

D30I 0.0048

DIS

MflTERIfiL DESCRIPTION

* Lean clay with sand

Project No. : X0271

Project: El ectro^o i ce

• Locat ion: Test Ho IB No, 2 Bag f 5 ' depth

Date: 6-17-96

GRflllH SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

MftTERIftLS TESTING CONSULTANTS

DIB

usesCL

c Cu

fifiSHTO

Remarks :

Moisture Content =

F i g . N n , :

iz.$y.

sultants, 9661 G o inrINC.

693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDSnMt 39503PHONE (616) 456-5469 « FAX (616) ' * B

TO Fishbeck Thompson Carr & Huber6090 E. FultonAda, Ml 49301

DATE

ATTENTION

RE:

7/1/96Jim Susan

JOB NO. X0271

Electro- VoiceLaboratory Soil Test Results

WE ARE SENDING YOU

I | Test Boring Logs

I | Copy of letter

I X | Attached | | Under separate cover via

f~~] Prints | | Plans

I | Data Sheets | |

the following items:

| | Samples | I Specifications

COPIES

i

DATE

6/27/96

6/21/96

NO.

2

2

DESCRIPTION

Hydraulic Conductivity Test Report

Report of Laboratory Compaction Test

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:[ I For approval j j Return _

I X | For your use |" | ____| X | As requestedI | For review and comment

REMARKS

corrected prints

COPY TO File X0271SIGNED:


Peter T. Johnson.aboratory Manager

onsultants.INC.

PROJECTCLIENT

CONTRACTOR

ENGINEER/ARCHITECT

693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS. Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784

Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck. Thompson, Carr and Huber

SOIL DESCRIPTION: Dark brown clayey SAND, little gravel____

MAX. DENSITY: _____125.0 LBS/CU.FT.*

ORIGIN OF SAMPLE: Excavated soil. Northwest corner of project

OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 10.0 PCT.

LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER:

PREPARATION PROCEDURE

121


MOIST OVERSIZE CORRECTION: ASTM D 4718

119

117

11

\V

11 13 15

REMARKS:


" The maximum density and optimum moisture content were corrected for 12.3 % oversizematerial retained on the No. 4 sieve per ASTM D4718.

TESTED BY: Steve Grooters

Distribution: I-Michigan Earthworks-Mr Kim Veiling

REVIEWED BY:

1-Fishbeck. Thompson, Carrbod Huber-Mr Jim Susan. P 6

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the clientprohibited

e sting MTC PROJECT NO.: X0271

693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784

PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT

Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber

DATE: 6-27-96

MTC SAMPLE NO.: 82783 TEST DATE: 6/26/S6

SAMPLE LOCATION: Yerington Brothers, Brown Pit, #14-64, test hole #4

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown lean clay with sand

TYPE OF SAMPLE: Remolded to 91.2% of ASTM D 1557 maximum density

SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - INITIAL

DIAMETER (IN.): 2.88 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.84 AREA (IN2):

DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 118.1 WATER CONTENT (%): 13.7

6.51

TYPE OF PERMEANT: De-aired tap water

MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE USED (PSI): 80.0

MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS. 6.0 psi

MINIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 3.0 psi

HYDRAULIC GRADIENT: 29.3

SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - FINAL

DIAMETER (IN.): 2.88 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.79 AREA (IN2): 6.51


AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC): 6.0 x lO"8

TESTED BY: PJ REVIEWED BY:: r-^J=^U&fi^*~^^PETER T. JQ/NSONLABORATORY MANAGER

Distribution: 1-Michigan Earthworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling 1-Fisnbeck, Thompson. Carr and Huber-Mr Jim Susan

e stinginsultants..Nc.

MTC PROJECT NO.: X0271



Electro-VoiceMjchigan EarthworksMjchigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson, Can* and Huber

DATE: 6/25/96

MTC SAMPLE NO.: 82782 TEST DATE: 6-24-96

SAMPLE LOCATION: Yerington Brothers, Brown Pit #14-64, test hole #2

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown lean CLAY with sand





6.51



MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 6.0 psi






AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC): 4.2 x 1Q-8

TESTED BY: PJ REVIEWED BY:PETER T. JOHNSONLABORATORY MANAGER

Distribution: 1-Michigan Eartfiworks-Mr. Kim Vetting 1-Fishbeck. Thompson. Cair arid Huber-Mr. Jim Susan

PROJECT NO

DATEX0271

"6/20/96"

PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTOR

ENGINEER/ARCHITECT


Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson. Carr and Huber

SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown lean CLAY with sand

MAX, DENSITY: 129.5 LBS/CU.FT. OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 10.0 PCT.

ORIGIN OF SAMPLE. Yerington Brothers, Brown Pit, #14-64, test hole #4


PREPARATION PROCEDURE: _

130


MOIST OVERSIZE CORRECTION: NONE

126

122

118

11 13 15

REMARKS:

TESTED BY: DH

Distribution: 1-Michigan Earthworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling


REVIEWED BY: f~^&*=^->f1-fcw-^-~-——

1-Fishbeck, Thompson, Can aM Huber-Mr, Jim Susan

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client isprohibited.

LMJ ate rialsLCPe sting

onsultants.PROJECT NO. X0271

DATE: 6/21/96



Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan Earthworks_________Fishbeck, Thompson, Carrand Huber

SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown lean CLAY with sand

MAX. DENSITY: 130.0 LBS/CU.FT. OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 9.5 PCT.

ORIGIN OF SAMPLE: Yerington Brothers, Brown Pit #14-64, test hole #2


PREPARATION PROCEDURE:

132



128

124

120

\\

\

11 13 15

REMARKS:

TESTED BY: PJ

Distribution; l-Micf.'gan Earthworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling


REVIEWED BY:

1-Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr ija Huber-Mr. Jim Susan

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client isprohibited

FROM : SEBC LPNDFILL PHONE NO. : 6166954230 JuK 01 996 10:51flM Pi

ifl/ightmaii Environmental, Inc. ^934-7707ENVIRONMENTAL AND TESTING SERVICES

4050 SOUTH PIPESTONE BO.P.O. BOX 95

SODUS, MICHIGAN 48126 )095

March 10, 1995

Southeast Berrien County Landfill3200 Chamberlain RoadBuchanan, Michigan 49107

Attn: Mr. Bruce Knapp

RE: SOIL TESTING

Dear Bruce:

As requested, two soil samples, labelled the Krause site and the Marschke site werecollected and analyzed for various parameters. The purpose of the testing was todetermine if the soil samples would b© suitable for construction of solid waste liners. Bothsample results look good. We should point out the permeability of the Marschke site wasover allowable rate of 1.00 x 10"7 centimeters per second, but the soil is classified as CLsoil.

The other good point about these samples is that the plasticity index for them is wellbelow 18. As a rule of thumb, fine grained soils with a plasticity index less than 18 arefairly easy to compact over a slightly larger moisture range, as compared to other finegrained soils.

If you have any questions, please call.

Sincerely,

WIGHTMAN ENVIRONMENTAL, INC,

Jon M. Hermann

JMH/afp

Mienigantarcrrtofxs.lnc. i-ax: (616)363-0018 Voice:(516)563-0001 To:Jim$usan atFTOH Page IcflO Monday,JulyOI, 199610:15:

FAXDate: Monday, July 01,1996 Time: 10:11:00 AM 10 Pages

To: Jim Susan From: Kim J. VeltingFTC&H Michigan Earthworks, Inc.

Fax: 676-8173 Fax: (616) 363-0018Voice: 676-2666 Voice: (616)363-0001

Comments:

Here are the test results for the material from Pelley Exc,Please let me know as soon as possible if this is acceptable.

n:

•iurii.wnu veiling MicniganbutriwofXs,inc. hax:(bib|»wiw Voice:(bibjAMWi o:Jtm Susan atHUH Page 4 of 10 Monda^JulyQIJSM 1Q;17:33/'

FROM : SEBC LRNDFILL PHONE NO. : 6166SS4230 Jul. 01 1996 10:52PM P3

SUMMARY SHEET

South East Benrien County Landfill

Sample Sample

Krause Site Marschfce Site

Percent Gravel 0.0 1.0Percent Sand 31.4 41.2Percent Silt 46.1 37.0Percent Clay 22.5 20.8Liquid Limit 27.4 31,0Plastic Limit 16.3 17.5Plasticity Index 11.1 13.5U.S.C.S. Classification CL CLModified Proctor Max. Density (pcf) 125.7 123.9Proctor Optimum Water Content (%) 11.1 10.6Permeability @ 70 deg F (cm/sec) 9.61 x 10-8 1.38 x 10-7Permeability Density (pcf) U2.8 112.8Percent of Modified Proctor (%) 89.7 91.1

Krause Stockpile

Percent Gravel 7.3Percent Sand 74.6Percent Silt & Clay 1S.1U.S.C.S. Classification SM

FROM : SEBC LflNDFILL PHONE NO. : 6166954230 Jul. 01 1996 13:52flM P2

0395-1358 Shilts, Graves & Associates, Inc.2 March 1995

Wightman Environmental, Inc.4050 S. Pipestone Rd.P.O. Box 95Sodus, Michigan 49126-0095

Attn: Mr. Jon Hermmann

Re: Laboratory TestsSE Benien Co. LandfillBag Samples

Gentlemen:

We have completed laboratory tests requested on the bag samples of soil delivered to ouroffice on 22 February 1995. The following tests were performed:

ASTM C136 Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse AggregatesASTM Dl 140 Amount of Material in Soils Finer Than the No. 200 SieveASTM D422 Particle Size Aoatysis of Soils (Hydrometer Tests)ASTM D4318 Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of SoilASTM D2487 Classification of Soils for Engineering PurposesASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Moisture - Density Relationship

Falling Head Permeability

Attached is a summary sheet with the tabulated results of the tests performed, along withthe grainsize curves and proctor curves of the samples tested.

If you have any questions or if we may be of farther assistance, please do not hesitate tocontact our office.

Sincerely,

SHILTS, GRAVES & ASSOCIATES, INC.

John J. Warner, CPGGeologist &, Sr. Engineering Technician

JJWrtmpEncls.

Veiling Michigan Eartnwofks, Inc. Fax.

: SEBC LRNDFILL

Voice; (616) 3634001 To; Jim Susan at FfC&H

PHGNE NO. : 6166954230 Jul. 01 1996 10:b4fin P5

FRO1 : SEBC LPNDFILL PHONE NO., 6166954230 Jul. 01 1996 10:56fiM P?

Shite, Graves and Associates, inc.1103 South Bend AvenueSouth Bend, Indiana 46617-1419Phone: (219)233-6820 FAX: (212)233-8242

ASTM C-136 Sieve Analysis of Rne and Course AggregatesASTM C-1 17 Materials Finer Than 75 Micron (No. 200) Sieve

In Mineral Aggregates by WashingClient,* Wightman Environmental, inc.

Project: SEBCL Karuse StockpileDescription: Brown Silly Sand

.Sample No.: 73005File: wrtHio40

Sieve Size: 12- diameterDate Sampled : 22-Feb-85

Received : 22-Feb-95Report Date: 27-Fet>95

Sample + TareTare

Net Sample

Before Wash(grams)

731.8292.3459.5

Washing Loss

Sieve Size1-1/2"

1"3/4"1/2"3/8"

No. 4No. 8No, 10NO. 16No. 30NO. 4ONo. 50No. 100No. 200

PanLoss

Weight Retained(grams)

0.06.7

25.320.4

6.7L 18.1

36.537.562.9

104.9

Distribution:Client

After Wash(grams)

657.9292.3365.673.9

PercentRetained

0.0960.0%0.0%0.0%1.5%5.8%4.6%1.5%4.1%8.3%j8.5%

14.3%23.9%

PercentPassing

100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%98,5%92.7%88.1%86,6%82.4%)74.1%65.6%51.3%27.4rJ

40.9 9.3%l 18.1%5.7

73.9Total 439.5

1.3%J16.8%

:rwrt;KimJ.Vetong Michigan Earitiwoto, Inc. Far (616)3630018 Voice: (616) 3634001 To: Jim Susan zt FTCJH

FROM : SEBC LPNDFILL PHONE NO. : 6166954230

Page 7 of tO Monday, JulyOt, 199610:20:04 Afc

Jul. 01 1996 10:55RM P6

...... ——————————• .—— ————L.

FROM : SE3C LPNDFILL- PHONE NO. 616S954230 Jul. 01 1996 10:57ftN P9

Shilts, Graves and Associates, Inc.1103 Soutii Bend AvenueSouth Bend, Indiana 46617-1419Phone: (219)233-6820 FAX: (219)233-6242

ASTM D-1557

Client:Project:

Description:

Sample No.:File:

Sample Date:Sampled By:

Received:Report Date:

Maximum Dry

Laboratory Compa<:tion Characteristics of Soil UEffort ( 56.000 ft-lbf/cf)WIghtman Environmental, Inc.Bag Sample SEBCI.Marschke Site

7300673006SP

WIghtman22-Feb-9527-Feb-95

sing Modified

Distribution:Client

Density = 123.9 pcf Optimum Me = 10.6percent

oo•3.£*"wiQ•>,Q

I H.LT

123.0-

122.O-

121.0-

120.0-

119.0-

11S.O-

117.0-

116.0-

115.0-

££.

m

•j

114.0- —————— . —————— T--— ——— i —— -s --- —— r ———— -< ————— ,7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11,0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15

Percent Moisture

Data Points —^~ Maximum

FROM : SE3C LANDFILL PHONE NO. 6166954230 Jul. 01 1996 10:56fiM P8

Shilts, Graves and Associates, Inc.1103 South Bend AvenueSouth Bend. Indiana 46617-1419Phone: (219)233-6820 FAX: (219)233-8242

ASTM 0-1557

Client:Project:

Description:

Sample No.:File:

Sample Date:Sampled By:

Received:Report Date:

Maximum Dry

Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using ModifiedEffort ( 56,000 ft-lbf/cf)Wightman Environmental, Inc.Bag Sample SEBCLKrause Site-

7300773007SP

Wightman22-Feb-9527-Feb-95

Distribution:Client

Density = 125.7 pcf Optimum MC = 11.1 percent

Dry

Dens

ity (p

cf)

125.0-

124.0-

123.0-

122.0-

121.0-

120.0-

119.0-

118.0-

———————

S!

•

117.0- —————— i—S.O 9.0

•

10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0Percent Moisture

" Data Points — — Maximum ;

9 0 NO X0271

•^693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784

DATE 7-12-96SHEET 1 OF 1



WEATHER: Overcast, warm LOW TEMP, F: 75 HIGH TEMP, F: 75

Type of Test Taken:

Sampled clay barrow pit.

Work Areas:

Muranski Pit, east of Buchanan, Michigan.

Remarks, Problems & Solutions:

Met with Blake Minert of FTC&H at the Electro-Voice site in Buchanan, Michigan. The writer followed Mr.Minert to Pelly Excavating's Muranski Pit east of Buchanan on Rauge Line Road. A representative sample ofthe clay being used at the Electro-Voice Site was taken. The soil was a brown sandy lean clay with gravel andcobbles. Returned to lab with sample.

Appropriate personnel on-site were informed of test results

Appropriate personnel were not present on-site to receive test results

TESTED BY: Scott Thompson REVIEWED BY:

Distribution: (l)-Michigan Earthworks-Mr. Kim Veiling }-Fishbeck, Thompson. Caff and Huber-Jim Susan. P E

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of She client iprohibited.

b^uatenals'e sting MTC PROJECT NO.. X0271



Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson. Carr_a_nd Huber__

DATE 7-22-96

pur, 0 8^ -v f * &*. i. •—

MTC SAMPLE NO.: 84141 TEST DATE: 7/19/96

SAMPLE LOCATION: Muranski Pit. Pelley Excavating, Buchanan, Michigan

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown sandy lean clay





6.51









AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC): 5.6 x 10'8

TESTED BY: PJ REVIEWED BY:PETER T. J.O/INSONLABORATORY MANAGER

Oistnbution 1-Michigan Earth works-Mr. Kim Veiling 1-Fisht>ec!<. Thompson. Carr and Huber-Mr Jim Susan

LJv_vLJPROJECT NO. X0271

DATE. ~1Tl4-9t




SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown lean clay with sand

MAX. DENSITY: 122.0 LBS/CU.FT. OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 10.5 PCT.

ORIGIN OF SAMPLE: North face of Pellie clay source


PREPARATION PROCEDURE:

124

85239 TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM D 1557. PROCEDURE A


120

116

112

10 12 14 16

REMARKS:

TESTED BY: SG

Distribution: 1-Michigan Earttiworlis-Mr Kirn Veiling


REVIEWED BY:

1-Fishbeck. Thompson. Carr and

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the cli°nt and any partial or whole reproduction without (he consent of the client isprohibited.

LxSJaterials'estinginsurants.™.

693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRANDERAfilQSi ^1-49505 ; ,1PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784* ^ "'* ^

TO Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber6090 East FultonAda, Michigan 49301

DATE

ATTENTION

RE:

8/26/96 JOB NO. X0271Dave Conklin

Electro- VoiceLaboratory Soil Tests

WE ARE SENDING YOU

| | Test Boring Logs

| I Copy of letter

the following items:| X_ | Attached | | Under separate cover via

I j Prints j | Plans | | Samples | | Specifications

| | Data Sheets

COPIES DATE

8/14/96

8/16/96

8/22/96

8/13/96

8/21/96

NO.

1

2

2

1

2

DESCRIPTION

Report of Laboratory Compaction TestPermeability Test Report (Flexible Wall)Permeability Test Report (Constant Head)

MOOT Class II Test

Grain Size Distribution Test Reports with USCS

T T

)L

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:

I [ For approval | | Return „| X | For your use [ | _____

| X | As requested

| | For review and comment

REMARKS

corrected prints

COPY TO X0271 FileSIGNED:


ter T. JohnsonLaboratory Manager

esting'Onsultants,

693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 " FAX (616) 456-5784

MTCJOBNO.: X0271DATE: 8-16-96


Electro-VoiceMichigan Earthworks

Fishbeck, Thompson, C;jrr& Huber

MTC SAMPLE NO.: 85496

SAMPLE LOCATION; Low area fill site

DESCRIPTION OF SOIL: Brown fine to coarse SAND; trace fines

SAMPLE AREA (cm2): 46.8

SAMPLE LENGTH (cm): 7.62

DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 114.8

MOISTURE CONTENT (%): 7.7

TEST DATA

TEST DATE: 8-14-96

TESTNUMBER

1

2

3

4

5

6

MANOMETERSHI

11.0

9.9

9.2

8,5

15.7

15.1

H2

9.4

7.7

6.5

5.4

11.7

10.6

HEADH(CM)

1.6

2.2

2.7

3.1

4.0

4.5

QUANTITYQ (CM3)

430.6

290.6

279.3

352.1

343.4

417.2

TIMET(SEC.)

1500

720

600

660

480

540

Q/AT

0.006

0.009

0.010

0.011

0.015

0.017

H/L

0.21

0.29

0.35

0.41

0.52

0.59

TEMPERA-TURE(°C)

25.2

25.4

25.5

25.6

25.7

25.5

COEFFICIENT OFPERMEABILITY

(CM/SEC.)

2.6 X ID'2

2.6 X ID"2

2.5X10-2

2.5X10-2

2.5x10-2

2.5x10-2

TESTED BY: Pete Johnson

Distribution: 1: Michigan Earthworks - Mr Kirn Vetting

REVIEWED BY:

Fishbeck. Thompson. CarrS Huber-Mr Jim Susan

This report has been prepared (or tfie exclusive use of ttte client and any partial or whole teprotfuction without tne consent o! the client is prolrbited

t—(\_A_ICUGI

"ripe sting©onsultants.iNc693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784

MTCJOBNO-: X0271DATE: 8-22-96


Electro-VoiceMichigan Earthworks

Fishbeck. Thompson, Can & Huber

MTC SAMPLE NO.: 85773

SAMPLE LOCATION: Drainage layer

DESCRIPTION OF SOIL: Brown fine to coarse SAND; (MOOT Class II)

SAMPLE AREA (cm2): 46.8

SAMPLE LENGTH (cm): 7.62

DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 115.8

MOISTURE CONTENT (%): 6.1

TEST DATA

TEST DATE: 8-22-96

TESTNUMBER

1

2

3

4

5

6

MANOMETERSHi

12.8

12.4

11.7

10,8

10.0

9.3

H2

11.5

10.6

9.3

8.1

6.8

5.6

HEADH(CM)

1.3

1.8

2.4

2.7

3.2

3.7

QUANTITYQ (CM3)

164.7

172.3

257.6

211.8

258.5

250.1

TIMET{SEC.)

600

480

540

360

420

360

Q/AT

0.006

0.008

0.010

0.013

0.013

0.015

H/L

0.17

0.24

0.31

0.35

0.42

0.49

TEMPERA-TURE(°C)

24.4

24.6

25.2

26.6

24.3

24.3

COEFFICIENT OFPERMEABILITY

(CM/SEC.)

3.1 X10"2

2.9X ID'2

2.9x1 0-2

3.0x10-2

2.8 x ID'2

2.8x10-2

f "

t.J

TESTED BY: P. Johnson

Distribution: 1 Michigan Earthworks - Mr. Kim Veiling

REVIEWED BY;

• Mr. JFishbecK. Thompson, Carr 8. Huber -Mr. Jim Susan,

THIS report has been prepared (or the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of (he client is prohibited.

estingonsultants.i*c

MTC PROJECT NO.: X0271

693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS. Ml -J9505PHONE (616) 456-5469 " FAX (616) 456-57S4



DATE: 8-16-96

MTC SAMPLE NO.: 85240 TEST DATE:

SAMPLE LOCATION: N. 3 + 08, E. 4 +84

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Clayey sand (SC)

TYPE OF SAMPLE: Undisturbed


DIAMETER (IN.): 2.86 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.84

8-9-96

AREA (IN2): 6.42


TYPE Of= PERMEANT: De-aired tap water



MINIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 3.0psi

HYDRAULIC GFtADIENT: 29.3




AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC):3.4 x 10'8

TESTED BY: P. Johnson REVIEWED BY:PETER T. JOffNSONLABORATORY MANAGER

Distribution: 1-Michigan Eartriworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling i-Fishbeck. Thompson, Carr and Huber-Mr Jim Susan

M H..M "• • ————

i_resting MTC PROJECT NO.: X0271




DATE: 8-15-96

tilMTC SAMPLE NO.: 85239 TEST DATE: 8-14-96

SAMPLE LOCATION: North face, Pellie clay source

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Sandy lean CLAY (CL)

TYPE OF SAMPLE: Remolded to 90% of ASTM D 1557 maximum density


DIAMETER {IN.}: 2.87 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.85 AREA (IN2):


6.47



MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 6.0 PSI

MINIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 3.0 PSI




DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 111,1 WATER CONTENT (%): 17.7

AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC): 2.7 X 1Q-8

TESTED BY: P. JOHNSON REVIEWED BY:PETER T. JOHWSONLABORATORY MANAGER

Distribution: 1-Michigan Eanhworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling 1-Fishbeck, Thompson. Carr and Huber-Mr. Jirn Susan

o;Ld

b.

80

70

60

£ 50uiO

£ 400-

30

20

10

200 100

\

10.0 1 .0 0 .1GROIN SIZE - mm

0.01 0.901

+3" GRAVEL y. SRND SILT CLOY0.0 8.3 42.4 27.5 . B

LL PI D30 D 15 '1025 11 1.24 0.172 0.0B13 0.0124 0.0019

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION uses ftfiSHTO

Clayey sand SC

Project M o . : X0371Project: E l e c t r o - V o i ce

* Loca t ion : Tube sample , N 3-1-88, E 4 + 94 C8-6-96)

Date: 8-21-96

GRflIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

MQTFPTDI Q8 irl 1 tl,r\XrlL.O

Remarks

85240

Fig. Mo.

cL?e stingOonsultants,iHc.693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS. Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784

Michigan Earthworks1931 Will Street N.W.Grand Rapids, MI 49504

Attention: Mr. Kim Velting

Project: Electro-Voice

Date 08-13-96Project No. X0271

Source Location:Sampled By:Sample Date:Tested By:Test Date:Lab Sample No.:Material Specification:

E - V: Low area fill site.Client7-23-96DH8-13-9685496MDOT CLASS II

1 iL

MECHANICAL ANALYSIS (ASTM C136)

Sieve Size Cumulatrve Percent Pass3"1"

No. 4No. 10No. 20No. 40No. 100

100100978265427

Spec. Req.100

60-100

0-30

Loss By WashResult: 4 % Specs: 0-7 %

Remarks: The sample tested met the MDOT CLASS n requirements for loss by wash and grading.

Reviewed by:Peter T. Jo j tonLabo ratorManager

cc: )- Fishbcck, Thompson. Can & Hubcr ~ Mr. Jim Susan, P.E.

) AGGREGATE INSPECTS >EPORT

Source of Mrterial

Sampled Fram _

Produced By __

Intended Usa

This Miterfit

Hequiremants. It is

ipecificai

8ttTe ? - \<C -^0 -| ? l^- Cnntrsctoi . . . . . .

SPEC/F/CAr/OWS6A

too35-100

3040

&4

0-1Q-3.fi04

«i&p«c0-1 S

20AA

10095/1 CO

ea«o

45.55

30-40

0-7

40%

3QA

100

6&8S

4040

2046

0-7

JH%

MB

LJ99J

6040

4046

30-40

2-10

Nont

aoc

100BC-10C

6944

3040

1640

0-10

22A

too90-1CO

etas

3040

44

25%

23A

100

6048

3540

9-1fl

2SA

tooOE-1004040t0400-12

040404

0-695%

31 A

•

100S6-100S54fio-as

04O404

o-ts95%

2W3

1009S-1006&4B3B-76204610400-10

04

305

10099-KM704545-7S2MB16480*10

04

dm

100

4MB

204*

040

04

Jittoo

60-10C

0-30

0-7

-

SIEVE OPENING5" Slow2-1S2"8tw*2"S«n1-1/2" Blw*1"S«M

3M"fii*-«1/2-tttve3/8"SltueNo.4Stw*No.8ffi«v»No. 1 S SWVtt4o.3D5lM*No.COSicw

EHC

ENT

P/\S

SIN

G

a.j

SsNo.tOOSlvv« I ^NgâOOâvtLataByWnhktgSoftFtrtkfosSum of Soft Part, a Ctoliwmmd PaniolMTtifn Of Slon- C«rtici4»CruiMd MatwUHMIn.

IH.,

Initial Wa&n of Svnpli \£^ 2-p-' f^--- G

MUNâDBI^kM 0

R.ttlMdFnatiQn.1 Pwwm Cumulative

WtJftht

6.Of^ *3*

-35'"^5a,~7.l&pTr-ff0tt '3-i*ii .9JlHIl 1

5li, 7rtfyS"* I

*• «s

- -1S"lte.qOrA__^. 1Q ,^X

. c20ii-^t/f jî*i «*j

/ô

R*UlnM

o. 0f -$•£>S1"*(^ .i^P^*^£\*&îpf iifji'î^î^/rtO

-^^— sP-—3?. . .. a ^

,7/p. ,,U->S^S-§*..IJ

•fe

!

_J ———

"otat AccumuUitKi Cyd*, to Dsu Signed:

•

•

1

100

90

80

70

UJ

5 60

£ 50LJ

Ld 40Q_

30

20

10

026

GFc

U)

"1 ^~S T" * • ^ —— * "Tl~ ' —— 9 f "'" '•" "T* rf**^* "TT~ • ^ Tf f^^ U II V ' -•- jr*^ mJOIN, SIZE DISTRIBUTIOIc c s c

0

• •- ^^L .Ic• N

;

i

:

Ns

:

:

s

N ~FLrcr~r PF"PnPT1 n — „ ^w_J B * X A —— * \-J 1 X. i

O GJ

--i ru•» HH

•K;s

<Js\,'s<SS<* .

100 13.0 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001GRRIN SIZE - mm

fc +3"0.0

LL

27

y. GRAVEL4.3

y. SAND35.0

X SILT37.3

y. CLAYZ3.4

PI

10

D850.457

Dee D500.0380

D300 . 0086

D150.0017

MflTERIfiL DESCRIPTION

• Sandy lean clay

Project No. : X0271Pro ject : El ec tro-Vo ice

• Locat ion : North face. Pel i e c lay source

Date: 3-21-96

HATES BB a B S ——

GROIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTi — * ir s~\. a rf~*" ~v~ i — t — > ~r~ ~r •. *S~* •^~*->"\k. «/~» i e i -r~ n^.RIflLS TESTING CONSUL TfiNT!

D10

usesCL

Remarks :

85339

F i g . N o „ ;

Cc Cu

ftASHTO

APPENDIX 5

FIELD DENSITY TESTING RESULTS

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr & Hnhnr, 7402 Wnntr.hirc, Suite 1H)_________Lnnninn. Midiiunn 4H917 ( 317 ) f.27-1141

DATE JOB TITLE JOB NUMBER

"PROJECT" EN GIN e EH

-»-

GAUGE NO

-^ *IMSPECT-OR ROUTE NO. or

DETERMINATION OF 1N-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

HEADING

MOIS-

TURE,

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

S

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY,

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM.

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCEFROM C

LEFT SIGHT

DEPTH3CLOWPtAN

ITEM

OFWORK

8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

at/•z" /y.c •ii

.3.

-*- JbL

/z" -7.

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bllumlnous)

TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURE*

DIP STICKREADING

(CU. ttj

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(01. IL)

DENSITY DETERMINATION

SOIL1*MOLD0

REMARKS:

WETSOtt,

g

WETSOIL

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS

BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF

MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr 4 Hubnr, 7M]2 WcnLnhi.ro, Suite 110_________Lnnoinn, Michinnn W)17 (S171 f,2',

JOB NUMBER GAUG6 NO.

PROJECT ENGINEER ROUTE NO. or STREET

DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TESTREADING

TEST

0£PTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST3EAOIN

MO1S-

.TURE.PCF

MOtS-

TURE.

S

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATIONDISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT RIGHTPLAN;iuo

ITEM

OF

WORK

S 10 11 12 t3 14 15 16

t-z.N 1

I L"

it"14 IfCY£N

W?\

/ / 5 ,Y_ A/

/.n121 (.0 T.&

2 + 6 V6^1

TEST NO.OR MMTEMP.

MOIS-TURE

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)

DIP STICKHEADING

(cu. (t)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.fi)


SOIL7*MOLD

0

MOI-D9

WETSOIL

WETSOILlfa«.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

1 S 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

<


Fiuhheck, Thompson, 1'arr A Huhnr, 7402 Wc^t. f ih irc?, Su i te 110Innning, H^rlmjfin W)M (517) fi27-l1A1

DATE JOB TITLE

INJZPECTOR

JOB NUMUEH

PROJECT ENGINEER

GAUGE NO

ROUTE NO. or STREET"

DETERMINATION Of- IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

HEADING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

HEADING

MOIS-

TURE.

PCF

MOIS-

TURE

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY,

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCEFflOMC

LEFT RIGHT

DEPTHJELOYVPLANilUOE WORK'

ITEM

OF

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

MOI3-TUOE

DETEHMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)

DIP STICKHEADING(cu-lt)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.lt)

DENSITY DETERMINATIONwe?

SOIL tMOLDMOLD

0WETSOIL

gWETSOILIba.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF1 8 10 CHART STANDARDS

DENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

I UHt ANUNUCLEAR METHOD

Thompson, Ca r r & Huhcr, 7';02 WcnLnhire, Suite 110Micliinnn W)M ( 5 1 7 ? 27-1161

DATE JOB TITLE

INSPECTOR

JOB NUMBER

PROJECT ENGINEER *

GAUGE NO.

ROUTE NO. or STREET

DETERMINATION OMN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TESTDEPTH

DENSITYW6T

PCF

TEST

1EADIN

MOIS-.TURE.PCF

MOIS-TURE.

DRYDENSITY

PCF

MAX.DENSITY.

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTIONSTATION

DISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT RIGHT

DEPTH3GLOWPIAN

GRADE WORK'

ITEM

OF

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

. a r <CV J°T._\ * i l l t .

/V'.V

//.C

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSlT¥-f&Jls & Bituminous)

TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURE

OiP STICKREAOINa

(CU. ItJ

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu. ttj


SOIL7*MOLD

9

MOLD

0WETSOIL

g

WETSOILIbx.

COMPACTEDSOIL W6T

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF


OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

NUCLEAR METHOD

DATE JOB TITLE

INSPECTOR

JOB NUMBED

PROJECT ENGINEER

GAUGE NO

ROUTE NO. or S T R E E T

DETERMINATION OF lN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DHY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

HEADING

MOIS-

.TURE.PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

*

(3RY

DENSITY

I'CF

MAX.

DENSITY.

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE IDEPTHIELOWPLANFROM E

LEFT fllOHT 3HAOE

ITEM

OF

ORK'

8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

a-7./ t&f -'f

3»*i C.

N


TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

Mors-Tune

DIP STICKHEADING

(cu. It)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE

(cu. (L)

DENS in' DETERMINATION

sou.7*MOLD

B

"OLD9

werSOIL

g

WETSOILtb*.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

1 4 8 10 CHART STANDARDS

DENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:


Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huhnr, 7602 Wc-iLnhire, Su i te 110Innainn, Hit:hinnn 'lilVI 7 ( 5 1 7 ) C i27-1141

DATE JOB TITLE

IfTSPECTOR

JOB NUMBER

/" ^7 ~?, -Jic~''' ~f~ C;PROJECT ENGINEER

GAUGE NO

ROUTE NO. or STREbl


TESTREADING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

1EADIN

MOtS-

.TURE,

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

S

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE

FROM E

LEFT RIGHT SHADE WORK

DEPTHJELOWPLAN

ITS.'.)

OF

8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

S.S

Kl. T It /3o.& /.<*» .*>

//Jf.s"

6 /V.z. / / / . e

(o" C.o

/_?.*?V

2V.DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)

TEST NO.OB MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURE

DIP STICKREADINQ

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLElcu.fl.)


SOIL +MOLD

MOLD9

WETSOIL

9

WETson.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF


OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr A Huhnr, 7402 Wnst.r.n ire, Suite 110Lnnsinq. Mirhinmi 'iJl'JI? (517)

DATE JOB TITLE

INSPECTOR

JOB NUMBER

(~~~ *7 -^ ?» Ci"-? <C3PROJECT ENGINEER "-

GAUGE NO.

ROUTE NO. o< STREET


TESTREADING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

HEADING

MOIS-

.TUflE.

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

S

DRYDENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY,

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCEFROM E

LEFT

DEPTHJELOV<PLAN

HIQHT sflAOE WOFU

ITEfOF

8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

/V o

4* o

y* \ ay. c

c. /


TEST NO.Oft MIXTfiMP.

MOIS-TURE

DIP STICKREADING

(CV.ILJ

VOLUMEMOLD onSAMPLE(cu-IL)

DENSITY DETERMINATIONWET

SOIL +MOLD

9

MOLD WETSOIL

9

WETSOILtbs.

COMPACTEDSOIL W6T

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCFa 10 CHART STANDARDS

DENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr & Hubnr, 74(12 Wnnfc:;hire, Suite 110________Lnnmnq, Hidiinnn 411917 (517J '"'•' ' ' " 1

DATE JOB TITLE JOB NUMBEH GAUGE NO.

INSPECTOR PROJECt ENGINEER noU TE NO. or STREET


TEST

HEADING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WETPCF

TEST1EAOIN

MOIS-

.TURE.

PCF

MOIS-TURE.

DRYDENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCEt

LEFT RICH

DEPTH3ELOWPLAN

ITEM

OF

WORK

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

/z . //J/.o ///•*?

/ee.s /C.o .s/VA.S

Z' 1

OETEflMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Blhimlnouj)

TEST NO-on MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURK

O'P STICKREADING(at ft)

VOtUMEMOtD OHSAMPLE(eu-rt.)

DENSITY DETEBMINATION

soil1*MOLD

a

MO«-O0

WETSOIL

9

werson.tto.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

1 8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

NUCLEAR METHOD

Kishbeck, Thompson, Carr A Huhnr, 7402 Wcst.nhire t Suite 110Lnnninq, Minhinnii <WJ17 f S l ? )


TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

HEADING]

MOIS-

TURE.

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY.

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT

DEPTHPEUOW

PLANRIGHT KJRADE

ITEM

OF

WORK

10 11 12 13 t4 15 16

K /:fjr

/o"

l±LV" g-7.7-

^


TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURE

DIP STICKREADING

(eo.lL)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu. IL)


SOIL *MOLDn

MOLD0

WETSOIL

WETSOILtbi.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

1 4 8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fiiibcck. Thompson, Carr & Hubcr, 7402 Westnhire, Suite 110/y " c^ c~ LnnGinq, Mjrrliinnn 40917 (517£ «2 7 rlt41___ ..._,_. _________ ... ———————————————

DATE JOB TITLE

\— V cT.c. ^ C^-j-^' Vr-t\:il'IJWMECTOH

joa NUMBERV^ "^ \S"i rr

"75~AO^ \^>

5~?-<r-S

DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITY

TEST NO.

I1

^

C^

'l

* i6-*

12

<

' X '

>

WET DENSITY

TEST

READING

3

^fc-vr

N ^

r -r

x r

TEST

DEPTH

4

. ~y f

!<=>"

s~^"

fJA-

If"

/C?"

^>-

C"

y>i

DENStTT

WET

PC?

5

/^o

/^7,^

/2S^

/Z^ -c

,30 _«./v.v'3/.C

^.czc.c

MOISTURE

TEST

HEADING

6

MOIS-

TURE,

PCF

7

tff.O

(fi.^

g^

/?.?

/^.S

*f.fft/

^r*T

/cs

Mors-TURE.

8

1C,

tt-Y/f ,/^.«t1C.

/V2

(u -

,</.!rr-*^r /

DRY DENSITYDRY

DENSITY

PCF

9

i ^^ .

//oi(L

/ /<±3,Ci

/ /V c^

//3.c

//V.?

^v

^ c

//<=./

MAX.

DENSITY.

PCf

10

/ZS"",S"

\ ^

ft?

•Lrs-

OF COM-

PACTION

11

**1 "2-

BS.

^S,\

^7-i^a.y

?-T

?/ V

=r( S.

SS.=7

S7.C,

LOCATION OF TEST

STATIC M

12

"e/ssU

ev2r-

DISTANCE

FROUC

LEFT

13mcwr

14

BELOW

stuoe15

te

ITE.M

OF

WORK

1fi

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)TEST wxonuixTEMP.

1

————

uots-Tims

2

REMARKS:/

DIP STICKREADING

3

i ^rVrlx \

' " Cr \

VO1.UM6uotoonSAUPUi

4

———— ———

j£S-.~^

DENSITY DETERMINATIONSrmr

t MOLD WET WETSOLD 9 son- SOIL

a n Ttn,

s a 7 a

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

S 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY

OPEHATfNG

MOISTURE

STANDARDS

BITUMINOUS M« DESIGN PCF

v V "*7 *^ r~

i.r - Ni /VC e ^

= 5 -^

^S""

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr i Htjhci-, 7402 Hcat.Thire, Suite 110/ ^-* ' I -._}

DATE

iwpeeTii&i

JOB T/TU£

V ^ ; ^ ^ ^ — —

JOB NUMHEfl

PROJEcif EMGiWfe6R ' RdUrte NO. « STREET

DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYT6ST NO WET DENSITY M013TUH6 DRV DENSITY LOCATION OP TEST

TE3TREAOINd

TESTDEPTH

DSN3ITY

W6TTC3T

lEADfNC

MOI3-.rufte

PCF

Mors-TUHE.

I3HY

osNsrrvI'CF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PEHCEMTOF COM-PACTION

STATION

OfSrANCCFROMC

terr

oe»mtas.o^

FLANRIOHT SfMOE WORK

OF

10 11 12 13 14 18

AS.Z i "73,. S.

C, // r. V

\

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr A Hubcr, 7^02 Wcstrvhire, Su i te 110

DAT*

? A^rAc:iHSHicrbfl

JQS TJfLE

tA^^^V ________

JOB NUM8EB

ST^^, ^^^.

OAUOE NO.

Tuiayfe NO. w sVheer —————————

DETERM1NATIOM OF IN-PUAC£ DENSITY

TEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRV DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

REAOtNaTEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WETTEST

MOIS-TURE.

PCF

wora-TUHE.

anyDENSITY

PCF

WAX-

DENSITY,

PCF

PCHCCNT

OFCOM-

PACTIOMSTATK3M

OtSTANCEFROMC

urr FttOMT SBAOt WORK

DEPTHCLOfUM

OF

10 13 H 16

V

>c=xc:

TBBTMO.OHUOCTEUP.

uots-TURK

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM OENStTY {Softs & Bituminous)

DtPSTTCKREAOINQ

VOLUMEMOLD OffSAMPLE|cu.fL)

De*STTT DETERMINATIONwcrson.*MOLD8_

MOLD WCTSOU.

D

WiTson.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAX

1 5 9 10 CHAflT STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS

HTTUMINOUS MK DESIGN PCF

REMARKS;

——y •-' - ^^* ^-*^—^>|^-^--^ J I.

MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMSNATNUCLEAH METHOD

Finhheck, Thompson, Carr i Huhor, 7402 Wcnr.:;hirn, Suite 110Lnn.nj_nr|. Mirli_u}fm 4f)91 7 ( 3 ) 7 ) /-,27-IUl

DATE

B/, /5CJ08 TITLE

IMSPBCTOR ^

JOB NUMBER

/— ^ -2i3>lCi'T2: C^>PROJECT ENGINEER

GAUGE NO.

3 _._ .ROUTE NO Of STREET

DETERMINATION Of: IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

^EADIN

MOIS-

TURE.

PCf

MOIS-TURE.

S

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTIONSTATION

DISTANCEFRQME

LEFT RIGHT

DEPTHI9ELOW

PLANSHADE

S 10 11 12 13 14 15

/o" //c:

/3o.V.

.o

V

M/

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM PENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)

TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

MO15-TTJRE*

DIP STrCKREADING(en. rt)

VOLUMEMOLD onSAMPLEfCU. (L)


SOlTfMOLD

9

WETSOIL

gWETSOILIbi.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF


OPERATING STANDARDS


NUCLEAR METHOD

DATE

Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Hubcr,Longing, HLnliinnn 4<)'J17_

7HQ2 Wcnlnhire,(317) f,27-1141

Suite 1 1 [J

DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OP TEST

TESTREADING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TESTMOIS-

TURE.

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

*

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE

FROM

LEFT RICH

3ELOPtAN

QRAO

ITEM

OF

WORK

a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

. . V "7V

/z.

PT"

TEST NO.OH MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURE

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY {Soils & Bituminous)

DIP STICKREADING(CU.IL)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.fLI


SOIL*MOLD

9

MOLDff

WETSOIL

9

WETson.Hn.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

1 3 8 9 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS

BITUMINOUS MfX DESIGN PCF

REMARKS:

C;NUCLEAR METHOD

DATE JOB TITLE

F'ishbeck, Ihompson, Car r A Mnhc:r, 7402 WerUnMm:, Suih> 1 HI

PROJECT ENGINEER ROUTE NO. or STHEbl

DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYT6ST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY tOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

W6T

PCF

TEST

HEADING

MOIS-

.TURE.

PC*

MOIS-

TURE.

S

DRYDENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT RlOHf

DEPTH1ELOW7LAN

3RAO!

a £1 10 11 12 13 14 15

S' ;/*/.*?

/ /V. =_£

//. a

/z

v/Cc

/O //V. o 70.

V.o

TEST NO.on MIXTEMP.

1

MOIS-TUH6


DIP STICKREADING(CU.fl)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(CU.IL)

DENSITY DGTEHMINATION,g,V»MOLD

0

MOIDQ

WETSOIL

9

WETSOILIts.

8

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF10 CHART STANDARDS

DENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

- C

^. A^^^

s±L2-V^-i.^—bd==^

NUCLEAR METHOD

__ ^_ Fishbeck,

DATE JOB TITLE

INSPECTOR V

ThompsonLnnninq ,

Carr 4 Huhor,MichUinn 4H91 7

JOB NUMBER

7402 Wentnhirc, Su i te 110(517 ) C.27-1141

^cs>0^PROJECT ENGINEER

GAUGE NO

ROUTE NO. or STREET

DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE OHY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TESTREADING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST1 HAD IN

MOIS-

TUR6,

PCF

MOIS- DRYDENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY,

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT HIQHT QHAOE WORK

DEPTH3ELOWPLAN

ITEM

OF

10 11 t2 13 14 15 16

iica.l

lo

If.y v /

//.o

//.I) T/

a./

TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP,

MOIS-TURE

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY {Soils & BHumlnous)

DIP STICKREADING

(cu. ILJ

VOLUMEMOID ORSAMPLE

(cu. It)


SOIL*MOLD

aMOLD

BWETSOIL.

9

WETSOU

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXOENSITY

PCF


OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATiNUCLEAR METHOD

-it. ' f^t-n^. f

DATE '

s/? /^ cIN/SPECJOR

^>-v Vez-A^. .

Fishbeck,

JOB TITLE

r

ThompsonLnnainn,

— S^.

, Carr & Huhnr, 7402 WeMichinrm 40V17 ( 5 1 7 )

JOB NUMBER

PROJECT EINGINE6R

nt.nhirc, Suite 110f,27-11i»1

..

GAUGE NO.

ROUTE NO. or STREET

DETERMINATION OF JN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTUHE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

1EAO1N

MOIS-

.TURE,

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

DRYDENSITY

FCF

MAX.

DENSITY.

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATIONDISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT

ITEM

OF

RIGHT QRAOE WORK

DEPTH3ELOWPLAN

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

\o" HfC.f

/ /*?.&

Sw*"

/ll.f t f

TEST NO.on MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TUHE


DIP STICKREADING

{CU.ILJ

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.f(.)


SOIL *MOLD

9

MOLDS

WETSOIL

9

WETSOILIbs.

COMPACTEDSOIL W6T

PCT

MAXDENSITY

PCF

1 8 9 10 CHAHT STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

g .

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Hufocr, 7402 Hcstr.hire, Suite 110Lnnninq, Mirhinnn 4H917 (517) /J27-11AL .-.

OAre TJOQ TITL£S /,< — &=j <Z* \ ^*-- \s c~ ^> er j V^*-

^T^^ ^ - X-

JOB NUMSEfl u«uuc >MVJ

I'HOJtCI ENGINEER ROUTE NO. ot STREET

DETERMINATION OF IN-PUACE DENSITYTE3T NO. WET MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

REAOINQTEST

DEPTHWgT

TEST

HEADIN

MOIS-

TURE.

PCF

MOIS-

TUflE.

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

fAM.

DENS1TY.

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE

FPQUC

LEFT RIGHT SRAOe WORK

OF

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

OJ£ W£JL

/ J i -

ClV

V -.

/Z_.J / /V.V

/VJ.

c"

TfgTtiaOH MIXTEMP,

uots-Tims*

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Sofia & Bltuoilnoiis)otpsncxRCAOIHQ

(CU. RJ

VOUMffiUOLDpfl

DENSITYWETSOIL

»trCOR.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXOB4SITY

10 CHAflT STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS

15itj BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF

HEMAflKS:

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Huhnr 7402 Wc3tr»hiL-«, Suite(517) fi27-UM.

DATE

" -i V. j-A1^*5-

JOB riTLt

vA^^^-V

JOa NUMBERr— — i— -^ •» * i, — -T ..^ ^T A 3. c i2- o

'S>v*H . ts v, _

OAUOE ^4O.

DETEHMINATION OF 1N-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO, W6T DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WETTEST

MOIS-

TURE.

PCF

MOIS-TURE.

13 RYDENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY,

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE [DEPTH9S.OWPIAN

FROMCmOMT 3RAOe WOHK

ITEM

OF

10 11 13 14 15

/ Z ' 1

//v.g.

. v

//c . -72-1

TEST NO.OftUIXT1WP.

MOIS-TURE

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY {Soils & Bilarohous)

HEAD WOVOLUME

SAMPLE(can.)

DENSITY DETEflMINATtON-WET"SOIL *MOU>

fl _

MOLD9

WETSOU.

WETSOU.On.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCFMAX

DENSITYPCf

1 8 Q 10 CHAflT STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS

BlTUMtNOUS MfX DESIGN PCF

REMARKS:

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fichbeck, Thompson, Carr & Hiibcr, 74G2 Wcstnhire, Suite 110Una ing. Mirhignn 4H.917 ._C.517J r.2?-11M

1 JOB NUMBEfl3Efl

3>^><^ic^GNGIMEEH

* . -^v.^ .__ .

OAUQE NO.

HOUTE NO. W STREET


TESTREADING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST1EAOIKC

MOIS-

.Turte.PCF

MOIS-TUBE.

DRYDENSITY

PCf

MAX.

DENStTY.

PCF

P£flCENT

OF COM-PACTION

STATION

DISTANCEFRQMC

LEFT

BSUOWPWM

mcur bruodwORK

ITEMOF

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19

fo" J£S . a

IHL IIC..1

/O. o

rry

TEST Maon urnTEMP.

lion-Turte*

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY <Solto & B»nmlmn»>OU> STICKBEAOIHO

VOLUMEUOLOOflSAMPLE(Cttfl)

DENSITY DETERMINATIONWETson. *•

MOLDWETSOIL.

9

WETSOILto.

COMPACTED9DIL WCT

PCF

MAXDQ43ITY

PCf


OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:


Fiijhbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Hnhor, 7402 Wo^t.-.him, Suite 110Lnnpinq, Hirlntjrui Jj(19jJ ( 5 1 7 )

DATE

O /s /<- f£5 /C_ /S (*.

JOB TITLE

tNSPE<TTOR \

i\c_^^-, f-\-<aJi .rvi r T

JOB NUMBER

PROJECT ENGINEER ^

'~v^ -^ ^^_ r*N. i c*^ f^\ ^^v * > ^— * _

GAUGE NO.

ROUTE NO. or STREET


TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

W6T

PCF

TEST

1EAOIN

MOIS-

.TURE.

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

H

DRYDENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENTOF COM-

PACTION

STATIONDISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT RIOHT

DEPTH9ELOWPLANQiuoe,

ITEMOF

WORK

7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

UA *7V.o»3?

/<=> o.i

//.s

TEST NO.on MIXTEMP.

MOIS-fURE

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)Or? STICKnEADINQ

{CU.ILJ

VOLUMEMOLD OflSAMPLE(calt)


SOIL tMOLD

0

MOLD WETSOIL

g

WETSOILtb*.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCFt 8 10 CHART STANDARDS

DENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS;

NUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbcck, Thompson, Carr A Hubor, 7602 Wcat.thire, Suite 110• _ _ . _ _ u. _i.; —— /.iiniT / n 1 "7 1 f.'}^ _11 /i1

Sr

JOB NUMBER

PROJECT gNGINggft x

_ —————— ~-j — ..i.id ..-~- ————————— -~— — -

OAUQE NO-

ROUTE NO. w STREET

DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITY

TEST NO WCT oeNsrrv MOISTURE DRY LOCATION OF TEST

TE3T TE5TT

OEPTHWET

POP

TESTMOI3-

.TUR6.

PCF

Mors-TUHE.

*

DHY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE

FHOME

LEFT

DEPTH3S.OW1FLAM

mOHT SftAOe WORK

ITEM

OF

s 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

0-3 41£

TEST HaonuncTEUP.

TWW

DETEflMINATION OF MAXJHUM DENSITY (Sotb & BHmafnous)OU» STICKREADMO

(CDLOJ

VOLUMEUOLDOttSAUPU3(cu-ft.)

DENSITY DETERMINATIONET

SOIL*MOLD

MOLDp

WETSOIL.

9

WETSOILtos,

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

fCf1 4 3 9 10 CHART STANDARDS

DENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


\^

NUCLEAR METHOD

FishbecU, Thompson, Carr A Huhur, 7602 Wcstntiire, Suite 110Lnnning. Mirhignn (1917 (517). fiZ7-1iqi

DETERMINATION OF 1N-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. W6T DGNSJTY MOISTURE DRY OBESITY LOCATION OF TEST

TESTflEADINd

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TESTlEAOfNG

MOIS-

TURE,

PCF

MOtS- DRV

PCf

MAX.

DENSITY

PCf

PERCENT

OFCOM-PACTIOM

STATION0 STANCE

FROMC

DEPTH38.CWPIAN

maur SRAOE ft-ORK

ITEM

or

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

32.a./ il.

TEST «xon tuxTEMP,

TUHE

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bilumfnous)

WP3T1CKPETAOOJa

(OtftJ

VOLUMEUOLDOffSAMPLE(ai. H»

tIETERMJNAnONWEson. *

MOLD9

MOLD„WETsou.

0

WETson.tta.

COMPACTEDson. WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF4 a 9 10 CHART STANDARDS

DENSITY MOISTURE

OPERAriNG STAWOAflDS


MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERIVIINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD

Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Hubor, 7402 Wcritnhire, Sui te 11Q_______Lnnairiq, Midiinnn 4(1917 (317 ) f .ZT - ITM

DATE JOB TITL£ JOB NUMBER

3 y//INPECTOR PROJECT ENGINEER BUUIE NO. or STREET


TESTREADING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WETPCF

TEST

1EAOIN

MOIS-

TURE.

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

DHY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATIONDISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT

ITEMOF

RIGHT QRAOE WORK

DEPTH3ELOWPtAN

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

s—T Q/.V7V /

&*L \.J

~Oi /V-f

lo*

V

TEST NOOR MIXTEMP.

DETEHMtNATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Softs & Bituminous)

MOIS-TURE

DIP STICKREAOIHO

(CU.lt)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.fL)


2JIL *OLDO

MOLD9

WETSOIL

g

WETSOtLK>».

COMPACTIDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF


OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

STURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD

P'ishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr i Huhcr, 7402 Went.;;ti ire, Sui te 110Lnnainn. Mich igrin 4H91 7 ( 5 1 7 ) C.Z7-T * '•"

DATE JOB TITLE

If^PECJTORr-^^W

2_KV"

JOB NUMBER

f-~~C7 ^>J*> C "?" C^>PROJECT ENGINEER

GAUGE NO.

ROUTE NO. or S T R E E T

DETERMINATION OF 1N-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

HEADING

MOIS-TURE.PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

S

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY.

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT

DEPTHJ6LOWPLAN

RIGHT RAOE WORK

ITEM

OF

8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

IT. a,//CD'' il^L

J / Z . Z V

/Z ^3g.s

to"

//o", V

/31.C.

-76'. o

//.s //s.vDETEHMtNATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils ft Bituminous)

TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURE

DrP STICKREADING

{CU.H.)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(CO. «,]

DENSITY [JETERMINATIONMOLD

VWETSOIL

gWETSOILItJJ.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

S 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

_S—-\


Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huhnr, 7402 Wcnt.ntiire, Suite 110Lnnainci, Mlchictnn 40917 (517) f>27-1U1

DATE

o / / rJOB TITLE

INSPECTOR \y^> \ \» ts- A r- -, * '• T™

JOB NUM6EH

PROJECT ENGINEER *

GAUGE NO

ROUTE NO. or STREET


TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

3EAOIN

MOIS-

.TURE.

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM.

FACTION

STATIONDISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT

DEPTH1ELOWPt-AN

ftlOHT SHADE WORK

ITEM

OF

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

10"

NItFt

/o

a. 2.lo

tTEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURE*

DETERMtNATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY {Soils & Bituminous)

DIP STICKREAOINO

<cu. IL)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(CU.IL)


OMT*ioLD

g

MOLDa

WETSOIL

g

WET5On-ttn.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF

8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

•zX


Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Huhnr,Lnnairiq, J-Ucliignfi 4fl9l7__

7402 Wcnt-.nhire, Suite 110(517) f.27-1161

DATE

S /ICs /S C

JOB TITLE

INSPECTOR ^

JOB NUMBER

PROJECT ENGINEER "*

OAUOE NO..-1

ROUTE NO. of STREET

DETERMINATION OF fN-PLACE DENSITY *•TEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST

READ IN'

MOIS-

.TUHe.

PCF

MOIS-

TURE.

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

MAX.

DENSITY.

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATION

DISTANCEFROM C

LEFT

DEPTH9B.0WPLAN

niQHT SHAOE

ITElf

WORK

10 11 12 13 14 15 1 D.

/v.st

//.o

IZ. fe

to / / .<=>

/y.l . V V

/e 13. 1 '(

n.t ts"TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

MOIS-TURE


DIP STICKREADING(CU.IL)

VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(CU.ILJ

OENS1TT DETERMINATION

SOIt *MOtO

V

MOLDV

W6TSOU.

9

WETSOILIbs.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCF


OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:


Fi-shbeck, Thompson, Carr & Hubnr, 7402 Wcntnhirc, Suite 110______________Lnnninq. Mirliinnn MVJM (517)

DATE

sA^/2iN^PECfOR

JOB TITLE

C

JOB GAUGE NO.

PROJECT ENGINEER -*£-

DETERMINATION OF~JN^-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST

TEST

READING

TEST

DEPTH

DENSITY

WET

PCF

TEST1EADIN

MOIS-

.TUHE.

PCF

MOIS-TURE.

S

DRY

DENSITY

PCF

WAX.

DENSITY,

PCF

PERCENT

OF COM-

PACTION

STATIONDISTANCE

FROM C

LEFT

DEPTH1ELOWPLAN

flIQHT SRAOE WORK

ITEM

OF

3 10 11 12 13 14 t5 16

JZ.IK

C_

V

TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.

DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils 4 Bllumlnous)

MOIS-TURE

Orp STICKRCAOINa

(CU.ILJ

VOtUMEMOLD OHSAMPLEICU.ILJ


soil1*MOLD

9

M°»-D0

WETSOII-

gWETSOIL.

COMPACTEDSOIL WET

PCF

MAXDENSITY

PCFto CHART STANDARDS

DENSITY MOISTURE

OPERATING STANDARDS


REMARKS:

APPENDIX 6EXCAVATION LIMITS LETTER

fishbeck, thornpson, carr & huberengineers • scientists • architects

June 4, 1996Project No. F93307Q

Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E. (HSRW-6J)Remedial Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V77 West JacksonChicago, IL 60606

Re: Electro-Voice, Inc. • Lagoon Soils RemediationComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act SiteBuchanan, Michigan

Dear Ms. Chow:

This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on May 31,1 996, concerning the soil excavation in thenorthwest area of the site.

T7ie limits of contamination indicated on the construction drawings are located too far to the west (at gridnodes 76, 78, and 80). Figure 2-4 of the Additional Studies Report (FTC&H, April 1995) shows the limitof contamination along grid nodes 1, 4, and 7. The design drawings limit was based on slope requirements;however, the distance provided is overly conservative. The limit of excavation in this area will be movedeast, closer to the grid nodes 1, 4, and 7. This move will not compromise safety or regulatoryrequirements. The exact location of the excavation limit will be based on field conditions and thecontractors' construction methods.

Please call our offices if you have any questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,

FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC.

James A. Susan, P.E.

Up

cc: Mr. Ronald M. Graham - Mark IV Audio of North America, Inc.Mr. Rob Franks -MDEQMr. Seth Bryson - CH2M HillMr. Kirn Veiling - Michigan Earthworks, Inc.Mr. Kenneth G. Wiley, C.P.G. - FTC&HMr. David L. Conklin, P.E. - FTC&H

J:\DOC93\C93307Q\LTCHOWI JAS

APPENDIX 7SURVEY DATA

Station PointNumber

N3+96.E5+2SE4+84E4-MCE3+96E3+52E3+08

N3+52.E2+64E3+08E3+52E3+96E4*40E4+84E5+28N3+08,E5+28E4+84E4+40E3+96E3+52E3+08E2+64N2+64.E2+64E3+08E3+52E3+96E4+40E4+84E5+28•J2+20 E5+28E4-*-8<»E4+4QE3+96E3+52E3+08E2+64N1+76.E2+64E3+08E3+52E3+96E4-r40E4+84E5+28

E4+-84E4+4GE3+9SE3+52E3*D8

NO+08.E3+52

Subgrade elevas of 7/7/96

719.34714.19712.43708.58708.17

707

708.17711.13715.52718.89721.08722.84724.15724.66723.94722.27720.41718.53713.2709

709.88715.88719.93721.5723.53724.59

725.24723.96722.46720.88717.76

711712.36718.88722.59723.51724.64725.62

727.54726.13725.24722.81714.49

717.86

top of clay elevas of 8/1 2/96

721 .32716.99715.31714.01712.7

71 1 .02

710.59714.17718.32721.37723.75725.3

726.53727,42726.77725.4723.21720.84716.38711.06711.67718.54722.51724.3726.12727.37

728.05727.15725.772374720.56712.5713.64721 .42725.3

727.07728.01728.88

730.25729.25727.77724.57717.04

720.33

ELbCT

Plan clay grades

722.34717.19715.43711.58711.17

710

711.17714.13718.52721.89724.08725.84727.15727.66726.94725.27723.41721.53716.2712

712.88718.88722.93724.5726.53727.59

728.24726.96725.46723.88720.76

714715.36721.88725.59726.51727.64728.62

730.54729.13728.24725.81717.49

720.86

RO-VO1CE Lf

clay depthasof8\12\96

1.982.802.885.434.534.02

2.423.042.802.482.672.462.382.762.833.132.802.313.182.081.792.662.582.802.592.78

2.813.193.242.862.801.501.282.542.713.563.373.26

2.713.122.531.762.55

2.47

KaOON S<

e/f

1.020.2

0.12-2.43-1.53-1.02

0.58-0.040.2

0.520.330.540.620.240.17-0.130.20.69-0.180.921.210.340.420.2

0.410.22

0.19-0.19-0.240.140.21.5

1.720.460.29-0.56-0.37-0.26

0.29-0.120.471.240.45

0.53

3ILS REMEDIA

REMARKS

Filled to markFilled to markFilled to mark

left highleft highleft high

Filled to markleft high

Filled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to mark

left highFilled to markFilled to mark

left highFiiled to markFilled to markFilled to markFiiled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to mark

Filled to markleft highleft high

Filled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to mark

left highleft highleft high

Filled to markleft high

****

Filled to mark

„

nowFinal

clay grd

722.34717.19715.43714.01712.7711.02

711.17714.17718.52721.89724.08725.84727.15727.66726.94725.4723.41721.53716.38

712712.88718.88722.93724.5726.53727.59

728.24727.157257723.8872076

714715.36721.88725.59727.07728.01728.88

730.54729.25728.24725.81717.49

720.86

Adjusted finalGrades

724.67719.52717.76716.34715.03713.35

713.50716.50720.85724.22726.41728.17729.48729.99729.27727.73725.74723.86718.71714.33715.21721.21725.26726.83728.86729.92

730.57729.48728.03726.21723.09716.33717.69724.21727.92729.40730.34731.21

732.87731.58730.57728.14719.82

723.19

Elev asof 8/20/96

723.58720.21718.06716.05714.59712.89

712.41717.30720.78724.01726.14727.79729.07730.21729.26727.68725.93723.61719.01713.46714.37720.94725.30727.51728.56730.04730.54

730.64729.40728.30726.93722.81714.97715.11723.86727.53729.28730.57731.49

732.40731.50729.88726.66719.11

722.45

e/ffrom clay plan

-1.24-3.02-2.63-4.47-3.42-2.89

-1.24-3.17-2.26-2.12-2.06-1.95-1.92-2.55-2.32-2.41-2.52-2.08-2.81-1.46-1.49-2.06-2.37-3.01-2.03-2.45

-2.40-2.44-2.84-3.05-2.05-0.970.25

-1.98-1.94-2.77-2.93-2.87

-1.86-2.37-1.64-0.85-1.62

-1.59

c/f fromadj. final

1.10-0.69-0.300.290.450.46

1.10-0.790.070.210.280.380.42

-0.210.020.05

-0.190.26

-0.300.870.840.27

-0.03-0.670.31

-0.12

-0.070.09

-0.26-0.710.281.362.580.350.390.13

-0.22-0.27

0.470.080.691.490.71

0.74

REMARKS

fccfff

fcfffffcffcfcfffccfc

cfccffffffcc

fffff

f

FinalVerificationSurvey11/31/96

724.25720

717.76716.55

714.6712.61

712.5716.7

720.62723.8

725.85727.68728.82729.94729. 15

713.32

716.11

732.4

729. 58

722.5

page 1

SUMMARY OF SURVEYING FOR

Station PointNumber

E3+96E 4-i-40E4+83E5+23N 0+4 4, E 5+ 28E4+84E4+40E3+96

Subgrade efev top of clay eievas of 7/7/96 as of 8/1 2/96

724.26 726.65728.63 729.96

731.82

ELECTRO-VOICE LAGOON SC

Plan clay grades clay depth c/fasof8\12\96

727.26 2.39 0.61731.63 1.33 1.67

ILS REMEDIATION

REMARKS Finalclay grd

727.26731 .63

**

Adjusted final Elev as c/fGrades of 8/20/96 from clay plan

729.59 729.57 -2.31733.96 732.04 -0.41

730.51725.68

FinalVerification

c/ffrom REMARKS Surveyadj. final 11/31/96

0.02 f1.93 f

730.726.

DENOTES CLAY WAS VERIFIED BY HAND AT THESE LOCATIONS TO BE 3' OR MORE

page 2

APPENDIX 8MEETING MINUTES

PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING AGENDA

Project: Electro-Voice, Inc. Lagoon Soils RemediationProject No.: F93307ID

Attendance:

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

1. General introductions and sign-in of attendees.

2. Summary of the work (Section 01010).

DescriptionRemedial Action Work Plan

3. Chain-of-Command

Owner: FTC&H/Electro-Voice, Inc.Engineer: FTC&HContractor: Michigan Earthworks, Inc.

4. Occupancy and operational requirements

Contractors use of premises

5. Preliminary Schedules

6. Staking and Inspection Services (01012)

7. Application for Payment (01027)

Date for monthly submittal:Cash Allowances (01021)

8. Contract Modification Procedures (01035)

BulletinField OrderWork Change DirectiveChange Order

9. Regulator)- Requirements (01060)

10. Contaminated Soil and Groundwater Procedures (01103)

11. Progress Meetings (01200)

12. Subrnitials (01300)

Shop Drawings, Literature: Engineer reuiin.s four copies.

Preconstruction Meeting AgendaPage 2

13. Testing Services (01400)

14. Construction Facilities & Temporary Controls (01500)

15. Contract Close-Out (01700)

16. Project Record Drawings (01720)

17. Liquidated Damages

18. Electro-Voice, Inc.'s Comments

19. Contractor's Comments

20. Regulatory Agency Comments

M E E T I N GM I N U T E S

IF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS THOUGHTTO BE INACCURATE OR INCORRECT, PLEASE CONTACT

WRITER AT ONCE FOR RESOLUTION,

Project: Electro-Voice Lagoon Soils Remediation Meeting Date: June 6, 1996

Project No.: F93307Q Meeting Place: Electro-Voice Plant

Subject: Progress Meeting No. 1 Meeting Time: 1:30 p.m.

Notes Prepared By: James A. Susan Adjournment Time: 2:30 p.m.

Attending: Mr. Ronald Graham - Mark IV IndustriesMr. Kim Velting - Michigan EarthworksMs. Eugenia Chow - U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyMr. James A. Susan, P.E. - FTC&HMr. David L. Conklin, P.E. - FTC&H

1. Project is on schedule.

2. Backfill will be delayed by one week, but should not affect the overall project schedule.

3. Excavation should be completed by June 14, 1996.

4. Clay will be obtained from the Urington pit, north of Buchanan. Sampling will be scheduled withinthe next several days. Drainage layer soil will also come from the Urington pit. The drainage layersamples will be collected at the same time.

5. Testing results will be sent to the U.S. EPA when received.

6. Backfilling could begin around June 18, 1996. The City of Buchanan has been notified that trucks willbe hauling material to the site.

lip

J:\DOC93\C93307Q\MIEV6696JAS

M E E T I N G -M I N U T E S


WRITER AT ONCE FOR RESOLUTION.

Project: Electro-Voice Lagoon Soils Remediation Meeting Date: June 27, 1996

Project No.: F93307Q Meeting Place: Electro-Voice ConstructionTrailer

Subject: Progress Meeting No. 2 Meeting Time: 11 a.m.

Notes Prepared By: James A. Susan Adjournment Time: 12 noon

Attending: Mr, Ronald Graham - Mark IV IndustriesMr. Kim Velting - Michigan EarthworksMs. Eugenia Chow - U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyMr. Rob Hunt - Michigan Department of Environmental QualityMr. Jason Kraus - CH2M HillMr. James A. Susan, P.E. - FTC&HMr. Blake Meinert - FTC&H

1. A revised construction schedule was distributed and discussed.

2. No problems have been identified. Rain has slowed construction.

3. Groundwater at the site is approximately 2 feet higher than when measured during the design.

4. Excavation should be completed by next week. Backfilling will begin next week also.

5. In-place density testing on the placed soil is as specified,

tc

J:\DOC93\C93307Q\PMTG6-27.JAS

V I E B U N GM IN U T E S


WRITER AT ONCE FOR RESOLUTION.

Project: Electro-Voice Lagoon Soils Remediation Meeting Date: July 18, 1996

Project No.: F93307Q Meeting Place: Electro-Voice Offices

Subject: Progress Meeting No. 3 Meeting Time: 11 a.m.

Notes Prepared By: James A. Susan Adjournment Time: 12 noon

Attending: Mr. Steven Slot - Michigan EarthworksMs. Eugenia Chow - U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyMr. Rob Franks - Michigan Department of Environmental QualityMr. Jason Kraus - CHjM HillMr. James A. Susan, P.E. - FTC&HMr. Blake Meinert - FTC&H

1. Clay is being placed on the side slopes before beginning the next lift.

2. It is anticipated that clay placement will be completed by next week.

3. Surveyors will be scheduled after the third lift iis completed.

4. A shelby tube sample will be collected after the third lift is completed.

5. The private properties bordering the deep excavation area must be restored to their originalelevation. This may require changing the contouring from that shown on the drawings.

6. The drainage layer must be MDOT Type n material.

7. MW9S was hit by a sand truck. The well will be repaired once the cap construction is complete,

psk

cc: AttendeesMr. R. Graham - Mark IV Industries

J:\DOC93\C93307Q\PMTG7-18.JAS

FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC.6090 East Fulton, P.O. Box 211 - Ads. MI 49301 - (616) 676-2666

7'1O'> WV-vMhfn- TVivr ^ i p l r - 1 m . I . , , , - , , • ,* M» 4HO 1 7 - /< r -n c-n i ' >

APPENDIX 9PREFINAL AND FINAL INSPECTION REPORTS

*

-•.. A /7' V

fishbeck, thompson, carr & huberengineers * scientists • architects

September 10, 1996Project No. F93307Q

Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E. (SR-6J)Remedial Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V77 West Jackson BoulevardChicago, IL 60604-3590

Re: Electro-Voice Superfund SiteLagoon Soils Remediation, Prefinal Inspection Report

Dear Ms. Chow:

On August 29, 1996, the Prefinal Inspection was held for the Lagoon Soils Remediation Project. Thefollowing persons were in attendance:

Ms. Eugenia Chow - U.S. EPAMr. Rob Franks - MDEQMs. Erin Potts - CH2M HillMr. Ron Graham - Electro-VoiceMr. Blake Meinert - FTC&HMr. David Conklin - FTC&HMr. James Susan - FTC&H

The materials testing results for the latest clay and sand samples were reviewed and a site walkover wasconducted. The following items require further attention:

1. The grain size analysis for the sand sample collected on August 14, 1996, was missing from thematerials testing report.

2. The fence has not been completed.

3. Reinstallation of monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, and MW-16.

The grain size analysis for the sand sample has been received by the testing company. All of the latest testresults are included in the site monthly report for August 1996. It is anticipated that the fence will becompleted during the week ending September 6, 1996.

Once the fence is compete, the final inspection will be conducted.

The monitoring wells will be reinstalled at the same time soil samples are collected under the Phase IIRemedial Action Work Plan from the area of the former dry well.

Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E.Page 2September 10, 1996

Please call our office if you have any questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,



net

cc: Mr. Rob Franks - MDEQMr. Seth Bryson - CH2M HillMs. Erin Potts - CH2M HillMr. Ronald M. Graham - Electro-Voice, Inc.Mr. Kenneth G. Wiley, C.P.G. - FTC&HMr. David Conklin, P.E. - FTC&HMr. Blake Meinert - FTC&H

;:\DOC93\C93307QALTCHOW2JAS

fishbeck, thompson, carr& hubeiengineers • scientists * architects

r u

October 17, 1996Project No. F93307Q

Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E. (SR^SJ)Remedial Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V77 West Jackson BoulevardChicago, IL 60604-3590

Re: Electro-Voice Superfund SiteLagoon Soils Remediation, Final Inspection Report

Dear Ms. Chow:

On September 24, 1996, you conducted the Final Inspection for the Lagoon Soils Remediation Project.Your inspection revealed that "Keep Out" signs \vere needed at each of the gates, and the survey stakesneeded to be removed from the cap.

As of October 15, 1996, the signs have been placed on the gates and the stakes have been removed fromthe cap.

Please call our office if you have any questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,



tc

cc: Mr. Rob Franks - MDEQMr. Seth Bryson - CH2M HillMr. Ronald M. Graham - Mark IV Audio, Inc.Mr. Kenneth G. Wiley, C.P.G. - FTC&HMr David L. Conklin, P.E. - FTC&H

J:\DOC93\C93307Q\LTCHOW3 .JAS

6090 (tat Fulton • Ada, Michigan 49301-0211 - 616/676 2666 - FAX 616/676-SI7

fishbeck, thompson, carr & huber · 2016. 6. 11. · fishbeck, thompson, carr & huber, inc,...

Documents