five year plan 2011

8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011

1/63

2012 to 2016

Five-Year Idaho TransportationInvestment Plan

November 2011


2/63

TABLE OF CONTENTSOverview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Funding Needs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Funding Assumptions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Investment Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Project Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Accountability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

PROJECT LISTS

Statewide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

District 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

District 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

District 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

District 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

District 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

District 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

Terms and Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61


3/63

Making it Easier to Track Projects

With New Five-Year Plan

To increase transparency and accountability, the

department developed the FY12 to FY16 Five-

Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan.

This document includes projects for highways,

bridges, public transportation, railroad cross-

ings, aviation, and non-motorized transporta-

tion. This is the first year the department is

publishing this document. Taxpayers can learn

in non-technical terms about:

Funding needs and assumptions

How projects are prioritized and selected

What projects are selected and when they will

be completed

How progress is measured

Assuming Flat Revenue Levels

The departments revenue forecasts assume fed-

eral highway apportionments will remain flat at

approximately $296 million annually through

federal fiscal year 2016. The State HighwayAccount is forecasted to increase from the

FY12 level of $234.1 million by approximately

one percent per year.

To achieve its performance goals with a flat

revenue stream, the department utilizes the fol-

lowing investment strategies:

Invest for Performance The department

targets investments to meet performance

measure goals.

Preserve the Current System Timely

preservation and restoration measures extend

the useful lives of roads and bridges. Current

revenue levels do not allow the department to

fund expansion projects.

Achieving State and Local

Transportation Objectives

State Highway System projects are designed to

achieve both state and local goals and objec-

tives. The department supports a transportation

system that links state and local roads and

bridges, public transportation, airports, bicy-

cle/pedestrian facilities, railways, and the ship-

ping port in Lewiston.

The 2012 to 2016 Five-Year Transportation

Plan invests over $2.3 billion in the following

categories.

Highways $1.6 Billion

Bridges $293 Million

Aeronautics* $308 Million

Public Transportation* $72 Million

TOTAL $2.3 Billion

* Most of these funds do not pass through ITD.

The department strategically targets invest-

ments to improve safety, enhance mobility, and

provide economic opportunity.

ITD is using integrated, state-of-the-art man-

agement systems to ensure all transportation in-

vestments align with the departments goals,

objectives, and performance targets.

Balancing Needed Projects with

Available Revenue

Each of ITDs six districts programmed their list

of projects to balance available revenue with the

ability to achieve the departments statewideperformance goals. The departments investment

strategies reflect each districts efforts to address

safety needs, coordinate road and bridge work,

maintain and operate the existing system, and

make the most efficient use of forecasted rev-

enue.

Energizing the EconomyIdahos gross domestic product and transporta-

tion system are inextricably linked. Improving

and maintaining Idahos transportation infra-

structure is a key component of Governor C.L.

Butch Otters vision to strengthen the states

economy through his Project 60 Initiative. Proj-

ect 60 is a plan to grow Idahos gross domestic

product from $51.5 billion to $60 billion.

In the past, ITD and most other transportation

departments in the country used project lists to

calculate how many jobs were created by each

project. ITDs new strategic plan breaks fromthe past by investing transportation funds to sup-

port Governor Otters Project 60 goals. This is a

major cultural shift for the department and sepa-

rates ITD from most of the transportation depart-

ments in the country.

How to Comment

If you would like to comment on this five-year

plan, call Adam Rush, Public Involvement

Coordinator, at (208) 334-8005 or e-mail your

comments to [email protected].

OVERVIEWFive-Year Transportation Plan

FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 1


4/63

Idahos Roads and Bridges are Aging

One-third of bridges on the State Highway Sys-

tem are over 50 years old. Many of them were

built during the interstate-construction era of

the 1950s and 1960s. These bridges were de-signed to last 40 to 60 years before being re-

placed. At current funding levels, they will have

to last 120 years.

The State Highway System has 369 bridges that

were built prior to World War II. Those bridges

are now between 60 and 90 years old and in

need of replacement.

The State Highway System has approximately

12,000 lane miles of paved highway. These

pavements were designed to last 20 years,

which requires the department to pave at least

600 lane miles per year to keep the percentage

of deficient pavement in Idaho from increasing.

The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act

(ARRA) stimulus funds helped the department

drive the amount of deficient pavement down

from 20 percent in 2008 to 16 percent in 2010.

Idaho is one of the fastest-growing states in the

country, but the growth is not solving the states

transportation-revenue issues. The departments

revenue projections are flat, but costs and de-

mands are high.

To balance the departments budget, this five-

year program will spend less money than is

needed on Idahos deteriorating but heavily

used transportation system.

Governors Transportation TaskForce Identifies Funding GapIn 2009 Governor Otter formed the Governors

Task Force on Modernizing Transportation

Funding in Idaho. The taskforce met nine timesduring 15 months, completing its work and is-

suing its findings in December 2010.

Lieutenant Governor Brad Little chaired the

task force. In the cover letter he wrote to Gover-

nor Otter that accompanied the task forces

findings, he stated First and perhaps foremost,

the Task Force members solidly confirmed

Idahos real and significant transportation

funding shortfall.

The task force affirmed a growing transporta-

tion funding shortfall for both the state and lo-

cal highway systems. The task forces final

report stated the following averaged amounts

are needed for the state and local transportation

systemsin addition to current funding levels:

$155 million annually for operation, preserva-

tion, and restoration of the state system

$107 million annually for operation, preserva-

tion, and restoration of the local system

$207 million annually for capacity and safety

enhancement for the state system

$74 million annually for capacity and safety

enhancement for the local system

FUNDING NEEDSFive-Year Transportation Plan

369 Bridges on the

State Highway System

Were Built Prior to WWII

Bridges on the State Highway

System Were Designed to

Last 40 to 60 Years.

At Current Funding Levels,

They Must Last 120 Years.



5/63


6/63

Meeting State and Local NeedsOnce the department identifies its funding pri-orities and makes its funding assumptions, it be-gins working closely with local transportationagencies and municipal planning organizationsto develop the transportation program. Thisbrings broad community representation and in-put into the decision-making process.

State Highway System projects are designed toachieve both state and local goals and objec-tives. The departments investment strategy isto provide complete transportation systems thatlink local roads and bridges, public transporta-tion, airports, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, rail-ways, and the shipping port in Lewiston.

ITDs resources are strategically targeted toprovide transportation infrastructure and serv-ices that contribute to and enhance Idahos eco-nomic opportunity.

Using Management Systemsto Maximize Funding EfficiencyThe department uses integrated, state-of-the-artmanagement systems to ensure all state trans-portation investments align with the depart-ments goals, objectives, and performancetargets.

These management systems provide the data re-quired to track performance measures, allowbetter planning and management of infrastruc-ture investments, and improve the departmentsability to measure and adjust performance.

These systems allow the department to use itslimited funds more efficiently and reduce oper-ating and system-management costs. Perform-

ance management is the key to the departmentssuccess.

Investing for Performance

The department developed a new strategic plan

in 2011. The plan has three primary goals that

drive the departments investment strategies:

GOALCommit to having the safest trans-

portation system possible.

GOALProvide a mobility-focused trans-

portation system that drives economic oppor-

tunity.

GOALBecome the best organization by

continually developing employees and imple-

menting innovative business practices.

To achieve its performance goals with a flat

revenue stream, the department utilizes the fol-

lowing investment strategies:

Invest for Performance The department

targets investments to meet measurable per-

formance goals.

Preserve the Current System Timely

preservation and restoration measures extendthe useful lives of roads and bridges. Current

revenue levels do not allow the department to

fund expansion projects.

ITD forecasts its future revenue stream andcontinuously reviews actual receipts against therevenue forecast in all major funding sources. Ifprogram adjustments are necessary, they areacted upon immediately.

INVESTMENT STRATEGIESFive-Year Transportation Plan



7/63

Selecting and Prioritizing ProjectsIdahos Five-Year Transportation Plan includesprojects for highways, bridges, public trans-portation, and aeronautics. The transportation

board and department select projects to furtherthe departments mission of improving safety,enhancing mobility, and providing economicopportunity. The first step in the process occurswhen the departments management team estab-lishes program performance measures, priori-ties, and funding levels. Teams for eachprogram area (pavements, bridges, etc.) thenmeet to:

Collect and analyze data to make project-tim-

ing decisions, such as determining the idealtime to perform a pavement-preservation or abridge-rehabilitation project.

Review and prioritize needs to provide thehighest return on investment performance andthe most benefit to Idaho citizens.

Recommend projects to meet performancemeasures within fiscal constraints.

The department also seeks input and recom-mendations within the established guidelinesfrom the states metropolitan planning organiza-tions and local governments. ITDs manage-ment team reviews recommended projects andforwards approved projects to the Idaho Trans-portation Board for input.

Following the transportation boards review, thepublic is invited to comment. After the com-ment period ends, the transportation board again

reviews the selected projects and approves atransportation program.

PROJECT SELECTIONFive-Year Transportation Plan

January ITD makes federal and state revenue forecasts.February ITD provides its federal and state revenue forecasts to metro-

politan planning organizations, the Local Highway TechnicalAssistance Council (LHTAC), and ITDs six district offices.

April May ITD receives project requests from transportation agencies andprepares a draft Idaho Transportation Investment Program (ITIP).

June Draft ITIP submitted to the Idaho Transportation Board forreview.

July Draft ITIP available for public review and comment.August ITD develops final recommended ITIP.September Final ITIP submitted to the Idaho Transportation Board

for approval.

October Board-approved ITIP submitted to the Federal HighwayAdministration and the Federal Transit Administration forapproval.

November Federal Highway Administration and the Federal TransitAdministration approve ITIP Federal Submittal Document.

Ongoing ITD obtains input from citizens, elected officials, tribalgovernments, state and federal agencies, metropolitanplanning organizations, the Local Highway TechnicalAssistance Council, and other interested public and private

organizations.

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT CALENDAR



8/63


9/63

PROJECT LISTSFive-Year Transportation Plan

Statewide (Districts 1 - 6)

Highways Contact:Tom Cole, P.E., Chief EngineerIdaho Transportation DepartmentP.O. Box 7129

Boise, ID 83707(208) 334-8806

Aeronautics Contact:Bill Statham, Project Manager, Division of AeronauticsIdaho Transportation Department

P.O. Box 7129

Boise, ID 83707(208) 334-8784

Public Transportation Contact:Randy Kyrias, Division of Transportation Performance Administrator

Idaho Transportation DepartmentP.O. Box 7129Boise, ID 83707

(208) 334-8281

Land area: 82,690 sq. miles

Lane miles: 12,039

Centerline miles: 4,945

Bridges: 1,803

84

90

90

84

84

15

15

15

86

95

2

95

91

95

20

20

93

26

93

30

9389

20

26

95

95

12

95

20

95

95

26

2

93

12

)38

)52

)97

)36

)21

)37

)33

)22

)200

)14

)39

)77

)51

)45

)1

)31

)3)60

)75

)27

)64

)47

)61

)7

)34

)71

)24

)11

)3

)34

)33

)8

)46

)28)55

)55 )29

)57

)75

)51

)28

)87

)78

)67

Ada

Adams

Bannock

Benewah

Bingham

Blaine

Boise

Bonner

Bonneville

Boundary

ButteCamas

Canyon

Cassia

Clark

Clearwater

Custer

Elmore

Franklin

Fremont

Gem

Gooding

Idaho

Jefferson

Jerome

Kootenai

Latah

Lemhi

Lewis

Lincoln

Madison

Minidoka

NezPerce

Oneida

Owyhee

Payette

Power

Shoshone

Teton

TwinFalls

Valley

Washington

Caribou

BearLake



10/63


11/63


12/63


13/63


14/63

FY12-16 Costs

Statewide Highways Project List

PROJECT NAME/LOCATION Year Develo

SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA

PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

LOCAL, FY12 RECREATIONAL TRAILS 2012STATE WIDE (No County Recreational Trails




2Report Sums


15/63

Statewide Public Transit Project List

Scheduled CostsScheduled Cos

PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013


PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 762CapitalSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 876 -Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 4,176Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN - 680Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL - 158Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN - 1,315Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL - 300Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 876Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 102 -Multi Modal PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 102Multi Modal PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 63 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN 38 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL 31 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL 14 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN 20 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 876 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN - 20AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 876AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL - 31AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN - 38AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL - 14AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 63AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 101 -MiscellaneousSTATE WIDE (No County

TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 101MiscellaneousSTATE WIDE (No County

2,121 9,512 Report Sums


16/63

Statewide Aeronautics Project List

Scheduled Costs



PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

AERO, AIRPORT SUPPLIES, INVENTORY RESTOCK AND SMALL PROJ 10 -Airport Facility MaintenanceSTATE WIDE (No County

AERO, AIRPORT SUPPLIES, INVENTORY RESTOCK AND SMALL PROJ - 10Airport Facility MaintenanceSTATE WIDE (No County

AERO, AIRPORT SUPPLIES, INVENTORY RESTOCK AND SMALL PROJ - -Airport Facility MaintenanceSTATE WIDE (No County



AERO, LAYOUT AND AIRSPACE PLANNING AT SMALL AIRPORTS 80 -Airport PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County

AERO, LAYOUT AND AIRSPACE PLANNING AT SMALL AIRPORTS - 80Airport PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County

AERO, LAYOUT AND AIRSPACE PLANNING AT SMALL AIRPORTS - -Airport PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County



AERO, SYSTEM PLAN, UPDATE STATEWIDE SYSTEM PLAN 368 -Aviation System PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County

AERO, SYSTEM PLAN, UPDATE STATEWIDE SYSTEM PLAN - 368Aviation System PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County

AERO, SYSTEM PLAN, UPDATE STATEWIDE SYSTEM PLAN - -Aviation System PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County



458 458 Report Sums


17/63

District 1 has five counties (Boundary, Bonner, Kootenai,

Benewah, and Shoshone), has a U.S. Navy submarine base,

and is Idahos only district with an international border.

The district is mountainous with numerous rivers, streams, and

lakes, and is home to approximately 212,000 residents (14% of

the states total population).


District 1Damon L. Allen, District Engineer District 1 Board Member600 W. Prairie Ave. R. James (Jim) ColemanCoeur dAlene, Idaho 83815-8764 Coeur dAlene(208) 772-1200


Lane miles: 1,469

Centerline miles: 593

Bridges: 269



18/63


19/63


20/63


21/63

District 1 Public Transit Project List




PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

TRANSIT, VVCC - BENEWAH CTY BUS SRVCS 44 -CapitalBENEWAH COUNTY Benewah

TRANSIT, CITYLINK - BUS SRVCS BENEWAH CTY & US95 CORRIDOR 308 -Mobility ServicesBENEWAH COUNTY Benewah

TRANSIT, VVCC - BENEWAH CTY BUS SRVCS 121 -Mobility ServicesBENEWAH COUNTY Benewah

TRANSIT, CITYLINK - BUS SRVCS BENEWAH CTY & US95 CORRIDOR 391 -Mobility ServicesBENEWAH COUNTY Benewah

TRANSIT, SPOT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT FOR DOVER AREA 112 -Mobility ServicesBONNER COUNTY Dover

TRANSIT, SMSI - BUS SRVCS RURAL TO SPOKANE & CDA 7 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 1 (No County

TRANSIT, COEUR D'ALENE URBANIZED AREA 1,107 -Mobility ServicesKOOTENAI COUNTY Coeur d'Alene

TRANSIT, COEUR D'ALENE URBANIZED AREA (SET ASIDE) - 1,107Mobility ServicesKOOTENAI COUNTY Coeur d'Alene

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 1 46 -Multi Modal PlanningKOOTENAI COUNTY

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 1 - 46Multi Modal PlanningKOOTENAI COUNTY

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 1 - -Multi Modal PlanningKOOTENAI COUNTY

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 1 - -Multi Modal PlanningKOOTENAI COUNTY



22/63


23/63


District 2James F. Carpenter, District Engineer District 2 Board Member2600 Frontage Rd. Janice (Jan) VasserP.O. Box 837 LewistonLewiston, Idaho 83501-0837

(208) 799-5090


Lane miles: 1,483


Bridges: 173

District 2 has five counties (Clearwater, Idaho, Latah, Lewis, andNez Perce), and is Idahos only district with a seaport, which is the

west coasts most inland port. This is also Idahos only district

without an interstate highway.

The topography varies from highly productive rolling hills of the

agricultural Palouse Region to the mountains of the

Continental Divide, and is a destination for outdoor

enthusiasts. District 2 is home to approximately 128,000 residents

(8% of the states total population).



24/63


25/63


26/63

FY12-16 Costs

District 2 Highways Project List



PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

STC-4759, WEBB RD, NEZ PERCE CO 2013NEZ PERCE COUNTY STP - Local Rural

SMA-7014, INT SNAKE RV AVE/SOUTHWAY AVE, LEWISTON 2012NEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston STP - Local Urban

LOCAL, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, LAPWAI 2012NEZ PERCE COUNTY Lapwai Public Lands (L)

OFFSYS, CHERRY LANE BR, NEZ PERCE CO 2013NEZ PERCE COUNTY Other (L)

LOCAL, FY12 LCVMPO METRO PLANNING 2012NEZ PERCE COUNTY Metro Planning




OFFSYS, GRELLE AVE SIDEWALK, LEWISTON SR2S 2013PAYETTE COUNTY Lewiston Safe Routes to School

OFFSYS, LEWISTON SR2S COORDINATOR 2013PAYETTE COUNTY Lewiston Safe Routes to School

Report Sums


27/63





PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

TRANSIT, CABS - GRANGEVILLE TO RIGGINS SERVICES 19 -Mobility ServicesIDAHO COUNTY

TRANSIT, CABS - GRANGEVILLE TO RIGGINS SERVICES 65 -Mobility ServicesIDAHO COUNTY

TRANSIT, RPT - MOSCOW SERVICES 11 -Mobility ServicesLATAH COUNTY Moscow

TRANSIT, RPT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT SRVCS MOSCOW 350 -Mobility ServicesLATAH COUNTY Moscow

TRANSIT, DAC NW - RURAL SRVCS NEZ PERCE & IDAHO CTYS 83 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY

TRANSIT, LEWISTON SAFETY EQUP 4 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON SIDEWALKS 500 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA 30 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON SMALL URBAN PASSENGER AMENITIES 21 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - 30CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON SIDEWALKS - -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, COAST - BUS SRVCS ALONG US 12 AND ID13 CORRIDORS 40 -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, COAST - BUS SRVCS ALONG US 12 AND ID13 CORRIDORS 50 -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA 304 -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA 41 -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - 315Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - 41Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston




TRANSIT, DISTRICT 2 19 -Multi Modal PlanningNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 2 - 19Multi Modal PlanningNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 2 - -Multi Modal PlanningNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 2 - -Multi Modal PlanningNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston

1,537 405 Report Sums


28/63


29/63


District 3David Jones, District Engineer District 3 Board Member8150 Chinden Blvd. Jerry WhiteheadP.O. Box 8028 BoiseBoise, Idaho 83714-8028

(208) 334-8300


Lane miles: 2,547

Centerline miles: 1,025

Bridges: 393

District 3 has 10 counties (Ada, Adams, Boise, Canyon,

Elmore, Gem, Owyhee, Payette, Valley, and Washington),

is Idahos most populated district, and also has the most

lane miles and bridges of Idahos six districts.

The districts terrain varies from high desert to agricultural

to rugged mountains, and is home to approximately

668,000 residents (43% of the states total population).



30/63


31/63


32/63


33/63


34/63


35/63


36/63


37/63


38/63





PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesCANYON COUNTY Nampa



TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA 113 -Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa

TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA 113 -Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa

TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - 113Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa

TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - -Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa



TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA 11 -MiscellaneousCANYON COUNTY Nampa

TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA 11 -MiscellaneousCANYON COUNTY Nampa

TRANSIT, TVT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT PURCH OF SRVCS D3 257 -CapitalDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, WITCO - MAINTAIN & EXPAND SRVCS ADA & CANYON CTYS 57 -CapitalDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, EOA - BUS REHAB & IMPROV FOR D3 SENIOR CENTERS 82 -CapitalDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 3 228 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, TVT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT PURCH OF SRVCS D3 1,016 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, TVT - JARC SRVCS FOR D3 115 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, VRT - MOBILITY MGMT SRVS ADA/CANYON 13 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, VRT - MOBILITY MGMT SRVS ADA/CANYON 26 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, VRT - MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SRVS ADA & CANYON CTYS 13 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, TVT - DIAL A RIDE SRVCS FOR SOUTHERN D3 29 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, VRT - MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SRVS ADA & CANYON CTYS 26 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 3 - 228Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County



39/63


40/63

District 3 Aeronautics Project List

Scheduled Costs



PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

AERO, HOMEDALE, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - -Airport Facility MaintenanceOWYHEE COUNTY Homedale

AERO, MURPHY, REHAB RUNWAY, TAXIWAY, AND APRON - -Airport Facility MaintenanceOWYHEE COUNTY Murphy

AERO, PAYETTE, FUEL FACILITY - -New Airport FacilityPAYETTE COUNTY Payette

AERO, PAYETTE, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 50 -Airport Facility MaintenancePAYETTE COUNTY Payette

AERO, CASCADE, RECONSTRUCT TAXIWAY, AWOS - 563New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY Cascade

AERO, CASCADE, PAPI, REIL, WAAS SURVEY - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY Cascade

AERO, CASCADE, INSTALL VERTICAL VISUAL GUIDANCE SYSTEM - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY Cascade

AERO, MCCALL, SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT 158 -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall

AERO, MCCALL, LAND ACQUISITION - 8,316New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall

AERO, MCCALL, RELOCATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall

AERO, MCCALL, RELOCATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall

AERO, MCCALL, SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall

AERO, DONNELLY, REHAB RUNWAY, TAXIWAY, AND APRON - -Airport Facility MaintenanceVALLEY COUNTY Donnelly

AERO, MCCALL, REHABILITATE AIRPORT BEACON - -Airport Facility MaintenanceVALLEY COUNTY McCall

AERO, CASCADE, REHAB TAXIWAY AND MASTER PLAN 158 -Airport PlanningVALLEY COUNTY Cascade

AERO, CASCADE, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DESIGN RUNWAY - -Airport PlanningVALLEY COUNTY Cascade

AERO, CASCADE, CONDUCT AERONAUTICAL SURVEY FOR WAAS - -Airport PlanningVALLEY COUNTY Cascade

AERO, WEISER, LAND ACQUISITION, AWOS - 400New Airport FacilityWASHINGTON COUNTY Weiser

AERO, WEISER, CONSTRUCT TAXILANE AND FENCING - -New Airport FacilityWASHINGTON COUNTY Weiser

AERO, MIDVALE, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 30 -Airport Facility MaintenanceWASHINGTON COUNTY Midvale

AERO, MIDVALE, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - -Airport Facility MaintenanceWASHINGTON COUNTY Midvale

AERO, WEISER, RUNWAY RECONSTRUCTION 2,012 -Airport Facility MaintenanceWASHINGTON COUNTY Weiser

AERO, WEISER, MASTER PLAN - -Airport PlanningWASHINGTON COUNTY Weiser



41/63


District 4

Devin O. Rigby, District Engineer District 4 Board Member216 S. Date St. Gary BlickP.O. Box 2-A CastlefordShoshone, Idaho 83352-0820

(208) 886-7800


Lane miles: 2,322


Bridges: 295

District 4 has eight counties (Blaine, Camas, Cassia, Gooding,

Jerome, Lincoln, Minidoka, and Twin Falls), is a rural agricultural

area, the worlds largest producer of Rainbow Trout, and is home

to the Sawtooth Recreational Area.

The district varies from mountains in the north to high desert in the

south, and is home to approximately 186,000 residents (12% of

the states total population).



42/63


43/63


44/63


45/63

FY12-16 Costs

District 4 Highways Project List



PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

US 30, 3400 E RD TURN LANE, TWIN FALLS CO 2014TWIN FALLS COUNTY Safety

SH 50, INT 3800 E RD, TWIN FALLS CO 2015TWIN FALLS COUNTY Safety

US 93, ROADSIDE PARK TO MP 11, TWIN FALLS CO 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Restoration

US 93, MP 11 TO DEEP CREEK, TWIN FALLS CO 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Restoration

US 30, JCT SH 50 INTERSECTION, TWIN FALLS CO 2013TWIN FALLS COUNTY Restoration

OFFSYS, MAIN ST SIDEWALK & SR2S COORDINATOR, KIMBERLY 2014TWIN FALLS COUNTY Kimberly Safe Routes to School

US 30, THOUSAND SPRINGS SB INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Twin Falls Scenic Byways (L)

OFFSYS, CHENEY DR; WASHINGTON ST to N COLLEGE RD, CSI 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Twin Falls Appropriation Earmarks

OFFSYS, CHENEY DR; WASHINGTON ST to N COLLEGE RD, CSI 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Twin Falls Non-Participating (L)

Report Sums


46/63





PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

TRANSIT, MRTA - NEW FREEDOM SRVCS BLAINE CTY & ID 75 CORR 50 -Mobility ServicesBLAINE COUNTY

TRANSIT, MRTA - JARC SRVCS BLAINE CTY & ID75 CORRIDOR 34 -Mobility ServicesBLAINE COUNTY

TRANSIT, MRTA - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT BLAINE CTY & ID75 586 -Mobility ServicesBLAINE COUNTY

TRANSIT, LINC - VOUCHER PROG TWIN FALLS & MINI-CASSIA AREA 215 -CapitalJEROME COUNTY Twin Falls

TRANSIT, LINC - VOUCHER PROG TWIN FALLS & MINI-CASSIA AREA 63 -Mobility ServicesJEROME COUNTY Twin Falls

TRANSIT, LINC - VOUCHER PROG TWIN FALLS & MINI-CASSIA AREA 58 -Mobility ServicesJEROME COUNTY Twin Falls

TRANSIT, TRANS IV - DIAL A RIDE SRVCS TWIN FALLS AREA 401 -Mobility ServicesJEROME COUNTY Twin Falls

1,407 -Report Sums


47/63


48/63


Scheduled Costs



PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

AERO, BUHL, MASTER PLAN - -Airport PlanningTWIN FALLS COUNTY BuhlAERO, BUHL, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/EIS/UPDATE - -Airport PlanningTWIN FALLS COUNTY Buhl


P L


49/63


District 5Edward A. Bala, District Engineer District 5 Board Member

5151 S. Fif th Ave., P.O. Box 4700 Dwight HorschPocatello, Idaho 83205-4700 Pocatello(208) 239-3300

Land area: 9,491 square miles

Lane miles: 1,841


Bridges: 315

District 5 has seven counties (Bannock, Bear Lake, Bingham,

Caribou, Franklin, Oneida, and Power), and is home to the Potato

Capitol of the WorldBlackfoot, Idaho.

The districts terrain includes fertile agricultural land, high desert,

and aspen-covered mountains. District 5 is home to approximately




50/63


51/63


52/63


53/63





PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA 10 -CapitalBANNOCK COUNTY PocatelloTRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 10CapitalBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -CapitalBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -CapitalBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA 73 -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello



TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 73Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 200Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 583Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY PocatelloTRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello





TRANSIT, DISTRICT 5 39 -Multi Modal PlanningBANNOCK COUNTY

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 5 - 39Multi Modal PlanningBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 5 - -Multi Modal PlanningBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, DISTRICT 5 - -Multi Modal PlanningBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA 20 -MiscellaneousBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 5MiscellaneousBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -MiscellaneousBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -MiscellaneousBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello

TRANSIT, PRT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT SRVCS IN D5 558 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 5 (No County

1,468 910 Report Sums


54/63

PROJECT LISTS


55/63


District 6Blake Rindlisbacher, District Engineer District 6 Board Member

206 N. Yellowstone Ave., P.O. Box 97 Lee GagnerRigby, Idaho 83442-0097 Idaho Falls(208) 745-7781


Lane miles: 2,302


Bridges: 358

District 6 has nine counties (Bonneville, Butte, Clark, Custer,

Fremont, Jefferson, Lemhi, Madison, and Teton), and has the

countrys longest main street33 milesin Island Park.

The terrain varies from the rugged Salmon River mountains in the

north to high desert in the south, and is home to approximately




56/63


57/63


58/63


59/63


60/63





PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

TRANSIT, START BUS - COMMUTER SRVCS DRIGGS JACKSON 15 -Mobility ServicesTETON COUNTY DriggsTRANSIT, DRIGGS - SERVICES W/ VICTOR-DRIGGS-GRAND TARGHEE 13 -Mobility ServicesTETON COUNTY Driggs



61/63


62/63


Scheduled Costs



PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY

AERO, DRIGGS, CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY - -New Airport FacilityTETON COUNTY DriggsAERO, DRIGGS, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - -Airport Facility MaintenanceTETON COUNTY Driggs

AERO, DRIGGS, RUNWAY REHABILITATION - -Airport Facility MaintenanceTETON COUNTY Driggs


TERMS AND ACRONYMS


63/63

Terms Used in Project Lists

District: The ITD District in which a projectis located

Expand: Expansion project

Key Number: A reference number ITD uses toidentify projects

Program: Performance Program Rail: Safety rail Route: The highway or road on which the project

is located

Rural (L): Local rural Total Costs: Total costs of the project fund source

over the life of the project

Work Type: Actual type of work to be completed Sponsor: The entity responsible for the

project and local matching funds

Other: Any other non-ITD funding

Acronyms Used in Project Lists

ADVCN: Advanced construction AIRMTNC: Airport maintenance AIRNEW: New airport facility

AIRPLAN: Airport planning AVISYS: Aviation system planning AWOS: Automated Weather Observation System

BR(S): State bridge BRLOC: Local bridge BROFF: Local bridge off system

CCTV: Closed Circuit Television (traffic camerasand intelligent transportation systems infrastruc-

ture)

Circle-M: Minor Pavement Rehabilitation CN: Construction, construction engineering, or

capital/purchase costs

CNL: Canal CSI: College of Southern Idaho EB: East Bound

ENV: Environmental ER: Emergency Relief

FA: Portion of federal aid used on the project FH: Forest highway HES: Safety hazard elimination

HIPRT21: High-priority TEA-21 HIPRILU: High-priority SAFETEA-LU HSIP: Highway Safety Improvement Program

ITD: Idaho Transportation Department, or IdahoTransportation Department state funds, or marked

for federal funding

IMPBR: Bridge improvement IMPCIG: Connecting Idaho GARVEE IMPRICMAQ: Congestion mitigation and

air quality

IMPENH: Enhancement IMPEXPAND: Expansion

IMPPLAN: System planning IMPRESTORE: Restoration IMPSFTY: Safety

INT: Intersection ITD BOARD: State funds allocated by the Idaho

Transportation Board

ISP: Idaho State Police ITS: Intelligent Transportation Systems L: Local

LOCPART: Local participation only (STAR) MIRL: Medium Intensity Runway Lights MPOS: Metropolitan Planning Organizations

MRTA: Mountain Rides Transportation Authority NON-Part: Non-participating funds not eligible

for federal reimbursement

NR: Near OPS: System support PAPI: Precision Approach Path Indicator

PC: Professional engineering by consultant PE: Professional engineering completed by

ITD staff

PL: Public lands PRSVNPV: Pavement preservation

RA: Rest Area REIL: Runway End Identifier Light

RRFB: Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon RRX: Rail Road Crossing RW: Right-of-way acquisition

SB: Scenic byways SHS: State Highway System SMA: Surface Transportation Minor

SR2S: Safe Routes to School STC: Surface Transportation System Collector

route type

STP: Surface Transportation Program TIP: Transportation Investment Program TMA: Local transportation management area

TRPTA: Targhee Regional Transportation Au-thority

T/W: Taxiway

WB: West Bound

Notes Used in Project Lists

1: Project is shown in a metropolitan TIP 2: Project is being advance-constructed with

non-federal funds

B: Project addresses ITDs strategic performancemeasures for bridges

C: Project addresses ITDs strategic performance

measures for congestion

G: Grouped project M: Pavement rehabilitationminor surface

treatment

P: Project addresses ITDs strategic performancemeasures for pavement

R: Bridge restricts commercial travel S: Project addresses ITDs strategic performance

measures for safety

SR: Bridge sufficiency rating (higher number =better condition using a scale from 1 to 100)

TERMS AND ACRONYMSFive-Year Transportation Plan

five year plan 2011

Documents