flash toroid review progress since last meeting in april next steps summary johnny ng flash coll....

12
FLASH Toroid •Review •Progress since last meeting in April •Next steps •Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

Upload: arline-blankenship

Post on 11-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

FLASH Toroid

• Review

• Progress since last meeting in April

• Next steps

• Summary

Johnny NgFLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

Page 2: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

FLASH Toroid Electronics

Work done by Bob Simmons (SLAC BCS Group)

Specs: Sensitivity Range: 1E7 – 1E9 elec. Accuracy: 1% Calibrations via charge inj.:

•electronics only•toroid + electronics

Noise Achieved in lab: 1.5E5 elec.

(April 2003)

Page 3: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

Test Toroid

Electronics Box

Bob’s Lab Bench

Page 4: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

Progress since April Meeting

• Fabrication:– New toroid built;– Whole assembly installed on beamline

• Parasitic beam test in FFTB (June 2003)– Readout using FLASH DAQ (2249W ADC)– High current: basic operations, long term

stability– Low current: noise/sensitivity

Page 5: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

FFTB Beam Line Map (Not to Scale)

“Green” Dump magnets

E165(Thin Target)

CollimatorPC 7.5

OD=1.2 inches

New Ion ChamberBeam Loss Monitor

beam

New FLASHToroid

OD=7/8 inches

Tunnel Entrance

Page 6: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

High current beam test

Data set spans more than 24 hours

Excellent correlation with standard toroid: RMS ~ 0.2%

Charge injection calibration stable to 0.4% (RMS)

(current attenuator used to avoid saturation)

Page 7: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

Low current beam test(current attenuator at front-end was still in place)

Excellent correlation with standard toroid down to N=5E9: RMS ~ 0.6%

Issues for N<5E9:Digitization noise in standard toroidSignal/noise in FLASH Lo-Gain mode.

FLASH Hi-Gain mode: RMS ~ 3%

The current attenuator was still in place for this test !!!

Page 8: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

Low current special run

(current attenuator at front-end REMOVED - Run 507)

Signal clearly seen down to 2E7Pulse shape comparable to off-time calibration signalNo RF noise from beam !Detail features (“pre-shoot”?) need to compare 1-turn injection

Page 9: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

Next Steps

• Absolute calibration in-situ– Network analyzer scans

– Pulse current measurements traceable to NIST

• Other tests– Linearity studies using pulser

– Calibration using 1-turn winding:

systematic effects?

• Useful RF techniques involved; could be a nice

project for a student.

Page 10: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

NLCTA Beam Current Monitor Test Setup(C. Nantista, SLAC)

Page 11: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

50 Matching

Center conducting rod

Calibration spool piece

Page 12: FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03

Summary

• New FLASH toroid monitor and electronics for low-current built and tested successfully

• Some beam test results:– Excellent long-term stability

– No evidence of beam-related RF noise

– Clear sensitivity down to 2E7

• Next– Absolute calibration

– More systematic studies